IAEA Director: We are doing everything possible to prevent a nuclear accident at the Zaporozhye NPP

30
IAEA Director: We are doing everything possible to prevent a nuclear accident at the Zaporozhye NPP

IAEA Director Rafael Grossi once again expressed his concern about the state of affairs around the Zaporozhye NPP. This is a man whose subordinates, even being directly at the ZNPP as part of a monitoring group and having the opportunity to study fragments of NATO-caliber ammunition exploding after arrivals, “could not determine who exactly was shooting at the territory and area of ​​​​the nuclear power plant.” At the same time, Grossi once again declares his hope that the ZNPP will be turned into a demilitarized zone.

Last week, the director of the IAEA stated that "weapons must be withdrawn from the station and the station must become a demilitarized facility." At the same time, Grossi argued that such agreements were supposedly about to be reached between Kiev and Moscow. This caused a wide public outcry in Russia, as concerned Russians suspected in these statements plans to withdraw Russian troops from Energodar with the simultaneous appearance of the Armed Forces of Ukraine already on the left bank of the Dnieper.



The Russian Foreign Ministry said that there were no negotiations with Kiev in this regard, and that Russia was not going to leave Energodar. True, it was stated that consultations are underway with the IAEA, and this “international” agency is already negotiating with Kiev for its part.

This time, Grossi, again touching upon the issue of the Zaporizhzhya NPP, said that the situation around the plant is unstable, potentially dangerous, bearing risks.

Grossi:

We are doing everything possible to prevent a nuclear accident at the ZNPP, primarily in terms of our initiative to create a nuclear safety zone around the plant. I hope that this will be agreed and that such a zone will be created.

All this can mean only one thing: through the IAEA, Kiev and its Western patrons are trying to convince Russia that there should not be Russian Guard fighters guarding the facility either at the station or around the station. Allegedly, in this case, the shelling of the plant will definitely stop, although the IAEA, as already mentioned, "does not know who is shelling the Zaporizhzhya NPP."

Is it possible to trust the director of the IAEA, as well as any other official from Washington-controlled "international" organizations, as well as any Western politician? This week, Angela Merkel actually gave an answer to this question when she said that by signing the Minsk agreements, the West allowed Ukraine to buy time, in fact, without intending to demand from Kiev the implementation of these agreements. In the case of the ZNPP, if some agreements on "demilitarization" are suddenly reached, it is highly likely that the same will happen.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    10 December 2022 07: 37
    Are you doing everything possible???
    1. +5
      10 December 2022 07: 54
      IAEA Director: We are doing everything possible to prevent a nuclear accident at the Zaporozhye NPP
      and when will the "magate" kly admit that the Ukrainians are shelling the station?
      1. +2
        10 December 2022 08: 19
        The only thing they do is to make it look like they are working hard on it without doing anything.
        1. 0
          10 December 2022 09: 41
          They are vigorously watching so that from Russia no one will slander at the address of the shelling the station! And the fact that it arrives from the side of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is stray nobody's shots. Wind blew)
      2. +1
        10 December 2022 11: 57
        Quote: Aerodrome
        IAEA Director: We are doing everything possible to prevent a nuclear accident at the Zaporozhye NPP
        and when will the "magate" kly admit that the Ukrainians are shelling the station?

        The competence of the IAEA inspectors raises serious doubts: they cannot even determine who is shelling the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant, admitting the possibility of Russian shelling of their own nuclear power plant. How can inspectors with a lack of logical thinking understand nuclear energy? They need to be checked in Ganushkin for madness. And what about our Foreign Ministry? Why can't Grossi be declared a crazy idiot?
    2. 0
      11 December 2022 21: 00
      - How could you deceive those who believed you?
      - Well, what's the question? I wonder how I could deceive those who do not believe me.
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +3
    10 December 2022 07: 42
    Let Grossi say anything, but we will not leave the coastline of the left bank of the Dnieper. And what ministry does the National Guard of Russia belong to?
    1. +1
      10 December 2022 17: 50
      Quote: tralflot1832
      And what ministry does the Russian Guard belong to?

      The National Guard belongs to the Ministry of Internal Affairs.
      1. 0
        10 December 2022 18: 35
        So the conversation with Grossi is over. hi
  4. +3
    10 December 2022 07: 44
    We are doing everything possible

    Again, the bourgeois have distorted everything: they are doing everything possible to make a nuclear catastrophe happen ...
  5. +4
    10 December 2022 07: 48
    Everything is simple.
    The Russian Federation is building nuclear power plants around the world, the IAEA gives permission for their operation.
    The IAEA, under the leadership of the United States, gave Rosatom a simple plug: either leave and give the ZNPP to the Ukrainians to provide for them, or we will block the work and construction of your nuclear power plants.
    The shelling is an incentive for the United States and ukrov to hurry up.
    1. +4
      10 December 2022 07: 53
      Quote: MrFYGY
      Everything is simple.
      The Russian Federation is building nuclear power plants around the world, the IAEA gives permission for their operation.
      The IAEA, under the leadership of the United States, gave Rosatom a simple plug: either leave and give the ZNPP to the Ukrainians to provide them, or we block the work and construction of your ZNPPs.

      Yes, nothing is simple here. The IAEA has no real leverage to block the operation of nuclear power plants (and construction too) - in the same Belarus, Hungary, Turkey, India. Well, perhaps again threats of sanctions, only then you need to call a spade a spade: not the IAEA, but the USA
      1. +1
        10 December 2022 08: 05
        Any "international" organization, before which the leadership of the Russian Federation begins to fawn and spread, the United States is a priori. In fact, this is an ultimatum from the United States. And the United States, unlike some, keep the words and threats.
        1. +3
          10 December 2022 08: 20
          Quote: MrFYGY
          words and threats keep.

          There are questions about the words ....
    2. 0
      10 December 2022 18: 48
      There's nothing stopping you from making reciprocal forks here. Nothing will prevent a quadcopter from dropping a mine on a Polish LNG terminal during unloading, nothing will prevent a train with another important bump heading to Kyiv from derailing. Only lack of eggs interferes
      1. 0
        11 December 2022 21: 02
        Here, after all, the authorities are usually hindered by the absence of something that would interfere with a bad dancer
        1. 0
          11 December 2022 23: 55
          We need to ask the Iranians for testicles, well, at least one. They weren’t very afraid to send PKR to American ships, and they don’t talk about what hinders them, but show what they did in spite of everything. They are building a metro in Tehran at a speed that Sobyanin should learn
          1. 0
            12 December 2022 00: 01
            Geraniums are only being requested so far, maybe they will ask for something else later. And Sobyanini is also studying. Look how quickly he learned to fasten the label "Moskvich" to the Chinese. And the price in China was 900 kilo rubles, and with Moskvich badges it was already 2 million. Where are the Iranians with their ancient approach to do their own thing. Darkness, not like our enlightened and wise rulers
            1. 0
              12 December 2022 01: 59
              Well, the approach to buy in China for a thousand, sell for 4 thousand, and somehow live from this profit of 3%, is quite a classic. And it’s hard to do something there, you have to think! Take it from here, process it there, find specialists here, buy equipment, pay wages to workers - why is it so difficult?!
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. +4
    10 December 2022 07: 56
    You are doing everything under the guise of concern for nuclear safety to play along with the Kyiv regime in gaining control over the station. The classic scheme: the Armed Forces of Ukraine is shelling the nuclear power plant, and the "kind" and "caring" uncles from a certain IAEA demand that Russia leave the region. Reminds of the OSCE peace initiatives with "gray zones" in the Donbass, which later came under the control of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other Ukrainian evil spirits.
  8. 0
    10 December 2022 08: 14
    Is it possible to trust the director of the IAEA, like any other official from Washington-controlled "international" organizations, or any Western politician?

    For that matter, this security zone should include the complete demilitarization of Nikopol and Marganets on the other side and, in general, the creation of a demilitarized zone there within a radius of 40 km ... The Ukrainians will not agree to this
    1. 0
      10 December 2022 08: 16
      We are glad to be deceived. After all, there is no responsibility, the people are silent. And the partners will also give money to the leftist.
  9. +2
    10 December 2022 08: 23
    Grossi balabol and American bedding. When the IAEA recognizes the shelling of nuclear power plants by Ukrainians.
  10. -2
    10 December 2022 09: 09
    IAEA Director: We are doing everything possible to prevent a nuclear accident at the Zaporozhye NPP

    You yap ... You stick your snout into the territory of the station when Russia allows it, and you will wag your tongue in Washington ...
  11. -3
    10 December 2022 12: 24
    The IAEA has no real leverage. But in the event of a nuclear accident, when determining the culprit, the opinion of the IAEA will be the most significant, they will actually determine it.
  12. +1
    10 December 2022 12: 34
    To prevent an accident at the ZNPP, it is necessary to bomb the Rovno NPP ...
  13. +1
    10 December 2022 15: 46
    It's a pity, of course, but it seems that Putin is being bred like a horse. He is kind to them
  14. -1
    10 December 2022 18: 44
    So that the Zaporizhzhya NPP is not shelled, you just need to settle IAEA inspectors near the vital places, and directly state that if something happens, something will fly through the French nuclear waste storage facility as compensation to Western Europe.
  15. +1
    11 December 2022 20: 49
    All these IAEA are America's dolls. Like the UN - bought by America in the bud.
  16. +1
    12 December 2022 07: 30
    IAEA Director Grossi
    very very concerned
    How can he eat a fish
    So the shelling is not taken into account
    You look, Director Grossi
    We will take everything into account and then ask
    Responsible for shelling
    There will be Kievan nobility.