Asian Press: GCC countries build up strategic partnership with China and turn away from US

32
Asian Press: GCC countries build up strategic partnership with China and turn away from US

The Chinese tabloid Global Times analyzes the preliminary results of Chinese President Xi Jinping's visit to Saudi Arabia, which will last until Saturday. US President Joe Biden's summer visit to Riyadh, during which he tried to persuade the heads of nine states of the Middle East to increase oil production and maintain US influence in the region, actually ended in failure. The relations of the Chinese leader are developing quite differently not only with the monarchies of the Persian Gulf, but also with practically all the states of the Arab world.

The meetings already held and agreements signed indicate that the Persian Gulf countries have chosen the course of strategic partnership with China, and this means a gradual withdrawal from the influence of the United States. On Thursday, Xi Jinping and King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud of Saudi Arabia signed a comprehensive strategic partnership agreement between the two countries, and also agreed to hold meetings between the heads of the two states in turn every two years.



According to the Asian press, during the visit of the Chinese delegation, Saudi and Chinese companies signed 34 investment agreements. Experts are confident that Saudi Arabia's efforts to diversify its industry fit perfectly with China's Belt and Road Initiative. Agreements were reached between Riyadh and Beijing on the development of cultural ties, China agreed to include Saudi Arabia in the list of countries for group trips.

Considering that Saudi Arabia is the only Arab country in the G20 club and plays a leading role in the Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf (GCC), the other states of the region are closely following the vector of development of its foreign policy. More and more of them prefer mutually beneficial cooperation with China on the terms of equal partnership as opposed to subjugation to the dictates of the United States, which provoke conflicts and disagreements in the region.

Abdulaziz Sagher, chairman of the Gulf Research Center in Saudi Arabia, believes that Sino-Saudi relations are a good example to follow, which can be extended to different countries in the Middle East region.

In the past, the leaders of many countries in the Middle East were considered proteges of the West, but now they are trying to get rid of this dependence in favor of sovereign development, striving for balance in cooperation with the major powers. China's balanced policy is becoming the best alternative to the imposed conditions of Western countries led by the United States.

Commenting on the China-Arab summit, Middle East Eye writes that the goals of China and the Gulf countries coincide in many areas:

This is a growing reality in the Persian Gulf. A possible free trade agreement, yuan oil deals, and BRICS membership would greatly strengthen ties between the Persian Gulf and China, further challenging US hegemony.

Experts believe that Washington's aggressive policy, aimed only at obtaining its own benefits, is forcing not only Arab, but all developing countries to leave the influence of the United States and build up strategic partnership with China. Saudi Arabia is moving in this direction, setting a good example for the rest of the region.
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    9 December 2022 14: 56
    The can is receding, a good reason for Trump to kick the current government.............
    1. -1
      9 December 2022 15: 15
      Quote from uprun
      The can is receding, a good reason for Trump to kick the current government.............

      What is your enthusiasm for? China is neither a friend nor a relative to us.))) Today it is exactly the same imperialist as the United States, and it is not yet clear which of them is more dangerous for the Russian Federation. Contracts of both the Russian Federation and other countries with China are often more enslaving than contracts with the United States or Europe. Note that China does not sell technology to such countries as the Russian Federation or Ukraine, but uses our technology.
      1. +3
        9 December 2022 15: 22
        Why this passage? Does anyone call China a friend in Russia? This is a good reliable partner. Everyone looks after their own interests. In general, Russia constantly announces the formation of a new multipolar world order. Not Sino-centric. But multipolar.
        1. -2
          9 December 2022 15: 45
          Quote: Andrei Rimsky
          This is a good reliable partner.

          No better than the rest of the "partners".
          Quote: Andrei Rimsky
          In general, Russia constantly declares the formation of a new multipolar world order. Not Sino-centric. But multipolar.

          There are a lot of top officials who say that this is their job. But in fact there is not and will not be any multipolar world, there will be a two-polar world, where the US and China will be the hegemons. And the Russian Federation, yesterday was a raw material appendage of Europe and the United States, and today it seeks to become a raw material appendage of China. But the Russian Federation does not want more, and if it did, it would develop its production, but it does not. The bulk of Chinese investment will go to the extractive industry, with payment in raw materials, as long as there are such agreements with China.
          1. +2
            9 December 2022 16: 31
            Everyone is already tired of the hegemons. Peoples and countries just want to live and trade, honor their traditions.
            And calling China a hegemon is ridiculous. These are merchants, there is no aggression at all. Over the past 20 years, only two countries have fought and are fighting - the United States and the Russian Federation. And China has created a beautiful popular popular army of millions, which fought only with sticks against the Indians, shakes the air, but is not able to decide after so many years to try to return its territory - Taiwan. They don't need it. Therefore, China is not a hegemon, but simply a major commercial and industrial power. Without exports to the United States, all their greatness will collapse instantly. An example of Japan before my eyes. And they know it, that's why they are so peaceful. And even the sanctions are observed.
            1. -2
              9 December 2022 16: 56
              Quote: Andrei Rimsky
              Everyone is already tired of the hegemons. Peoples and countries just want to live and trade, honor their traditions.

              Alas, today it is a utopia.
              Quote: Andrei Rimsky
              And calling China a hegemon is ridiculous. These are merchants, there is no aggression at all.

              See what China is doing in Africa. In general, at least a little read the history of China.
              Quote: Andrei Rimsky
              And China created a beautiful popular popular army of millions, which fought only with sticks with the Indians, shakes the air,

              Very funny.)))
              Quote: Andrei Rimsky
              but unable to decide after so many years to try to return their territory - Taiwan.

              Why should they be in a hurry? Taiwan, in fact, has long been in their pocket. All the body movements of Taiwan are the kicking of a frog in the beak of a heron, nothing more.
              Quote: Andrei Rimsky
              Therefore, China is not a hegemon, but simply a major commercial and industrial power. Without exports to the United States, all their greatness will collapse instantly. An example of Japan before my eyes.
              Comparing China and Japan, in this context, is at least not smart. And why do you think that the US and China will be left without trade ties? And the Chinese market is far from being just the United States.
            2. +3
              9 December 2022 17: 20
              Quote: Andrei Rimsky
              An example of Japan before my eyes ...


              That's exactly why China is striving not to depend on the United States in the long run, because. The example of Japan shows that despite friendship, the open Western market has borders, crossing which will instantly bring down the country's economy...

              At one time, Japan's potential was very high, and it could well overtake the United States in many areas, but as soon as the Americans felt threatened, they immediately imposed huge duties and took control of the Yen exchange rate (Plaza agreement) ... and patents? Almost everything belonged to American companies, and in the case of an independent course, nothing would be left of the Japanese economy.

              So, if China gains technological independence from the West, then even in its own domestic market it will be able to leave .... because. already now it is the largest automotive market in the world, the largest smartphone market, the largest .. (by many other indicators) + the middle class is much larger than in the USA, i.e. they have already overtaken America in the number of rich people, and that is why the West does not want to lose such a market .... it is a two-way dependence, and Western companies have very serious profits from the Chinese market.
              1. +1
                9 December 2022 17: 45
                China will not gain any technological independence from the US. They are already limited in technology. The Yankees have long begun to slow down China. It is no coincidence that I cited Japan as an example. The US will not tolerate competitors.
            3. 0
              11 December 2022 13: 52
              And in Iraq, count the troops of how many countries fought and are fighting? And what about the purely peace-loving state of Israel? And who bombarded Libya? Which country regularly slaughters the population of northern Iraq and Syria?
      2. +2
        9 December 2022 16: 15
        Quote: aleksejkabanets
        Today he is exactly the same imperialist as the United States, and it is not yet clear which of them is more dangerous for the Russian Federation.


        In this situation, it is smarter for the United States not to fight with Russia, but to have her, if not as friends, but at least as fellow travelers. Return all relations to the level of 2014, lift sanctions, give Ukraine to the discretion of Russia, but Russia will deal with Europe itself - “All sisters according to earrings, all elders according to their positions.”
        1. +1
          9 December 2022 16: 27
          Quote: tihonmarine
          In this situation, it is smarter for the United States not to fight with Russia, but to have her, if not as friends, but at least as fellow travelers.

          And there is. As I understand it, the United States is primarily destroying Europe, in terms of industrial potential, and accordingly cutting it off from cheap energy sources. And it is impossible for the Russian Federation to solve this problem without sanctions.
          1. +2
            9 December 2022 17: 10
            Quote: aleksejkabanets
            And it is impossible for the Russian Federation to solve this problem without sanctions.

            Well, something like this is true, and even with the forces of Europe to do their dirty work, to weaken Russia.
            1. +1
              9 December 2022 17: 57
              Quote: tihonmarine
              Well, something like this is true, and even with the forces of Europe to do their dirty work, to weaken Russia.

              The most successful way to weaken Russia, unfortunately, is best done by Russia itself.)))
        2. +1
          9 December 2022 17: 19
          Quote: tihonmarine
          In this situation, it is smarter for the United States not to fight with Russia

          And the United States is not at war, others are at war. And the democrats only provide paid services to the side of the conflict.

          Quote: tihonmarine
          Return all relationships to the level of 2014

          No, this is not enough. Here they would return to the level of the 91st, but here they will no longer agree.


          Quote: tihonmarine
          give Ukraine to the discretion of Russia

          Are you laughing? They didn't take it for that. Not for that the Union was destroyed ...

          Quote: tihonmarine
          well, Russia will deal with Europe itself

          Europe, even with its own problems, is not always allowed to deal with it on its own. It's their cow, they're milking it...

          Quote: tihonmarine
          to have her, if not in friends, but at least in fellow travelers.

          The problem is that they do not need "friends" and "fellow travelers", they need lackeys.
      3. 0
        9 December 2022 18: 15
        What is your enthusiasm for? China is not our friend or relative.)))

        countries do not have friends, everyone has their own interests and this is normal

        Today he is exactly the same imperialist as the United States, and it is not yet clear which of them is more dangerous for the Russian Federation.

        not exactly the same
        China didn’t steal 300 billion from us, and it doesn’t dictate policy to us with economic sanctions, the main thing for China is business, and not LGBT rights in other countries

        the main thing is that the hegemon is now the United States and he does not hide that he wants to rule the world, if China can move it and there will be a multipolar world, then this is only a plus for us
      4. 0
        11 December 2022 13: 53
        I just love the passage "Contracts of both the Russian Federation and other countries with China are often more enslaving than contracts with the United States or Europe" because it is based only in the "fact" which goes "we are the good guys, they are the bad guys" and nothing else!
  2. +2
    9 December 2022 15: 01
    The Western media trumpeted to the whole world. Xi is going for cheap oil. Obloms, not a word about oil. All agreements and intentions are only about the development of high-tech joint ventures. The West did not grow together in forecasts! laughing
    1. +2
      9 December 2022 15: 07
      Quote: tralflot1832
      All agreements and intentions are only about the development of high-tech joint ventures. The West did not grow together in forecasts!

      But why? This does not rule out selling oil for yuan. Bad prospects for the US... for dollar hegemony.
      1. 0
        9 December 2022 15: 33
        So they still have a day. laughing
        1. +1
          9 December 2022 16: 33
          Quote: tralflot1832
          I don’t remember if a horse motorcade was attached to Biden’s limousine?

          Limousine without horses. But if you look at three photos, then an interesting movie turns out:
          This is the Russian delegation

          This is the American delegation:

          This is Chinese:
    2. 0
      9 December 2022 15: 19
      Quote: tralflot1832
      All agreements and intentions are only about the development of high-tech joint ventures

      Yeah, but only in the extractive industry and with payment in raw materials. We have almost the same agreements, China does not share technology and there is no equal partnership there and will not be.
      1. KCA
        0
        9 December 2022 15: 37
        Katai is building an early warning system with the help of Russia, but they don’t have missile defense systems like the A135, S-500, and even more so the A235, we’ll bargain, share both finished products and technologies
        1. -1
          9 December 2022 16: 09
          Quote: KCA
          Katai is building an early warning system with the help of Russia, but they don’t have missile defense systems like the A135, S-500, and even more so the A235, we’ll bargain, share both finished products and technologies

          Alas, they ate a year or two ago, for tractors, for example, China was ready to build joint ventures and the questions were only about the share of "Russianness" of components, but today, after the well-known events related to Ukraine, China does not even want the nameplate "made in Russia" sculpt, but we are not talking about Russian components at all. China is an imperialist worse than the West, it cleans the Russian Federation no worse than the USA and Europe.
  3. +2
    9 December 2022 15: 04
    GCC countries step up strategic partnership with China and turn away from US

    The consequences for Western Europe and the US could be catastrophic for their economies. And for Venezuela, a big plus.
  4. +1
    9 December 2022 15: 13
    During this mass act of defiance against the States and the beginning of the globalization of the East, it is very important that Russia not be left on the sidelines. We have a long list of what we can offer as a significant contribution to equal cooperation ... it's up to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs!
    1. +1
      9 December 2022 16: 07
      Quote: Peter_Koldunov
      it's up to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs!

      If we are behind the Foreign Ministry, then we will definitely stay on the sidelines ...
  5. +1
    9 December 2022 15: 23
    We are waiting for the US attacks on the Arabs and China. .............
    1. 0
      9 December 2022 15: 35
      They have joyful joy, the black woman returned home from cold Russia. Not until then. They will start on Monday.
  6. GIS
    0
    9 December 2022 15: 41
    Well, here the predictions are being fulfilled: Russia provides an "umbrella of nuclear weapons", Asia (China at the head) - goods, the east - food and energy. all together a self-sufficient system of supply and demand.
  7. +1
    9 December 2022 15: 57
    Keep your nose in the wind.....,..........
  8. +1
    9 December 2022 17: 01
    Huawei signs many big contracts with Saudi Arabia and it's good for them
  9. 0
    9 December 2022 19: 26
    Everything you say is very interesting that more friends will have more opportunities. Russia will develop better and better.