The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation showed a video of the destruction of two Ukrainian radar stations by Russian drones

70
The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation showed a video of the destruction of two Ukrainian radar stations by Russian drones

During the special operation, the Russian Armed Forces are increasingly using unmanned aerial vehicles for various purposes. So, today the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation showed a video of the destruction by Russian shock drones two Ukrainian radar stations (RLS).

This was reported by the press service of the defense department.



The military did not begin to clarify what type of loitering ammunition was used, showing only footage of the operators' combat work and its results.


The department reported that the destroyed Ukrainian stations were located in the Kherson region.

The Russian crews of the strike UAV complexes accurately hit the P-18 all-round radar and the 36D6 radar station of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which were on alert in the Kherson region

- says in the description of the published video.

In addition to kamikaze drones, a reconnaissance unmanned vehicle was used, which recorded the destruction of enemy equipment.

Recently, the Russian military quite often posted on the Internet video footage of strikes using various types of loitering ammunition. Among them you can see drums Drones "Lancet". Also on the network you can see footage of the combat operation of the Kub UAV, published by the press service of the Rostec state corporation. The Russian military has already managed to evaluate the effectiveness of domestic unmanned vehicles.

70 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +22
    5 December 2022 18: 47
    Damn, the calculation survived .. More explosives ..
    1. +4
      5 December 2022 18: 55
      to damage the very thing ... to fix what the scoop was doing ... dreary ... until they take it away ... until they evaluate whether it is possible ... they won’t give the dill a new one
      1. +4
        5 December 2022 18: 57
        In Zaporozhye there is a plant where radars are produced. Well, or they did, I hope.
        1. +15
          5 December 2022 19: 11
          destruction by Russian drones of two Ukrainian radar stations
          This is not destruction - this is damage, nothing more. Drones are too weak for such cases.
          1. +3
            5 December 2022 19: 27
            Damage, destruction... equipment withdrawn from combat or not in the end? That's what's interesting.
            1. +1
              5 December 2022 21: 04
              It would be the most powerful warhead and there would be no need to guess ....
              1. +1
                5 December 2022 22: 41
                Any product is the result of various compromises. If (I don’t know how, in fact, that’s why I asked above) the warhead has enough power to disable equipment, then why put more, thereby reducing the flight time?
                1. +5
                  6 December 2022 06: 44
                  How many times I see the defeat of the radar (especially when it comes to 19ZH6) and wonder why the "Lancet" is directed to the antenna mirror. Instead of aiming at the hardware? In Zaporozhye, an enterprise that produced such radars throughout the post-Soviet years, apparently there are repair kits there. It is easier to change the antenna mirror than the radar hardware, which is located with the antenna system on a single chassis.
                  But the P-18 radar was amazed correctly.
                  And yes - the power of the "Lancet", even under the letter (in modification) 5, is not enough ... meaning relative accuracy. But with a direct hit of 5 kg. yet it turns out to be enough. Even for self-propelled guns, and sometimes a tank.
          2. +2
            5 December 2022 20: 07
            Quote: marchcat
            This is not destruction - this is damage, nothing more

            The arms and legs will be torn off. You can probably live. Prostheses are different. So here too. The cabin can be welded, the running gear is most likely not damaged. Change everything else. It's not for you to fix the Chimera
          3. 0
            5 December 2022 20: 21
            It is for such cases that they are not yet weak, but tanks and armor are not particularly tough for him. I don’t understand one thing, when they started to produce it that it wasn’t visible, or what? Have they been tested or not? Or are they intended for infantry?)))
            1. +4
              5 December 2022 20: 40
              Quote: azkolt
              It is for such cases that they are not yet weak.

              Yeah. I went to the Arsenal plant in Kyiv for a repaired standard P-15. Do you know how many were repaired? Eight months!!! For a second. This is 4 months of a database on the border with NATO with one wing. That is, Our division had a priority order for repairs. And by the way, no missile strikes. Just broke
              1. -1
                6 December 2022 18: 38
                But it can be repaired, but it must be DESTROYED. And I asked the question, for what purposes was it then taken, if they do not have a special effect on tanks, and on armor, too. Destroy only not particularly protected targets. Yes, they hit the antenna, it scattered, we can only hope that they don’t have spare ones (I’ll say it like an amateur). But in any case, according to Konashenkov's reports, we have already destroyed many times more than they had in service. The colonel in the telegram channel had a comparison of how much was and how much was destroyed, so I have a feeling that there weren’t so many in Europe!)))
            2. +1
              6 December 2022 10: 51
              Quote: azkolt
              It is for such cases that they are not yet weak, but tanks and armor are not particularly tough for him

              Recently there was a video of the use of the "Lancet", apparently with a cumulative warhead - after the hit, a "spoke" appeared instead of a cloud.
              1. -2
                6 December 2022 16: 27
                on the video, just the cumulative is visible .. In general, you need to make drones based on the Ailerons T16.
          4. +1
            5 December 2022 21: 10
            if one drone is weak, then you need to work in a flock and put 2-4 drones there
          5. +2
            6 December 2022 02: 06
            What do you think destruction means? Turning into dust, or what? :) ... If the radar equipment, the cockpit (especially the rotation transmission) and the same antenna are destroyed, it’s already cheaper to make a new one. No one will restore it .. As a former pvoshnik I say ...
          6. +1
            6 December 2022 11: 48
            Quote: marchcat
            This is not destruction - this is damage, nothing more. Drones are too weak for such cases.

            For you, I understand destruction, this is when the antenna flew 200 meters away
          7. 0
            6 December 2022 15: 32
            Shoot at the TV - there will also be damage. And the price of repair is cheaper than a new one.
        2. +2
          5 December 2022 23: 27
          Quote: dmi.pris
          In Zaporozhye there is a plant where radars are produced

          They bombed that factory, just recently ...
      2. +3
        5 December 2022 22: 07
        And what do you hear about the use of Hermes 2.0 missiles in NWO? Such a thing would not hurt. I hope they can test it.

        . Russian specialists will create an improved version of the promising Hermes tactical strike system with a faster and more powerful missile. This was announced by the industrial director of the Rostec weapons complex Bekhan Ozdoev. According to him, the new ammunition will be equipped with a warhead 2-2,5 times more powerful than the current one. The peculiarity of the Hermes is the implementation of the “fire and forget” principle, which allows you to instantly change position after launch. According to experts, the appearance of such weapons will significantly enhance the strike potential of the Russian Ground Forces.


        .“He (“Hermes.” - RT ) is a new generation complex that occupies a niche between guided artillery shells and operational-tactical systems. It has no analogues in the world, ”says the KBP website.


        . The maximum firing range of the Hermes is 100 km. The complex is capable of hitting enemy tanks and armored vehicles, engineering and fortifications, surface and low-speed air targets at any time of the day. A promising strike system can conduct salvo and single fire from unprepared and closed positions.

        https://russian.rt.com/russia/article/828082-germes-kompleks-raketa-modernizaciya
      3. -1
        6 December 2022 16: 40
        Pashok let a smell into the VO. Your ancestors did it, and your peers destroyed it. So have the decency not to offend them.
    2. +4
      5 December 2022 19: 20
      Quote: dmi.pris
      Damn, the calculation survived

      Well, Lancetik saw the calculation of 36D6, and therefore most managed to escape unharmed before hitting the cabin, but the calculation of the P-18 was unlucky or vice versa. They didn't hurt. Chick and they are already in heaven or hell. The caponier, of course, protects against artillery, but for a high-altitude station it increases the locals, that is, the dead zone from below for missile or unmanned strikes.
    3. +2
      6 December 2022 02: 14
      The calculation survived because I SAW the flying Lancet on the indicator screen! I saw that he was flying into them - and faded from the station before the impact, that's the whole answer.
  2. +2
    5 December 2022 18: 49
    It would be better to have 500ku or a "pyvton" bomb, to be sure
    1. +3
      5 December 2022 19: 00
      The lancet was clearly loitering ... and maybe they didn’t expect "such" a goal ... Well, that’s their point, to attack as soon as they see ... and it’s dangerous for aviation to fly near the radar .... it’s not just there stood ... obviously the command post and the launcher were within the communication radius
  3. +11
    5 December 2022 18: 50
    Oh, weak Lancetik! The damage is far from 100%, the whole crew is alive - There would be Geranium-2 - so there would definitely be no stone left unturned, including radar operators!
    1. +4
      5 December 2022 18: 56
      It is necessary to attach a warhead from a bumblebee to the lancet-3 ... it is just 3-4 kg ... ODB ... there it would have bent the entire radar and, with a difference in pressure, would have killed or caused a bore injury to the personnel that is directly next to it
    2. +2
      5 December 2022 19: 11
      The radar is a delicate thing, and most likely there are no spare parts for repair, the Lancet is cheaper by an order of magnitude of the x-31 missile
    3. +5
      5 December 2022 19: 42
      Quote from: Peter1First
      Oh, weak Lancetik! Damage is far from 100%, the whole calculation is alive

      The main station is out of action, apparently for a long time, if not forever. The antenna was completely demolished, and it is not known what else was inside with fragments. Perhaps only a frame with wheels can be used to transport dung.
    4. 0
      6 December 2022 02: 13
      Quite normal! And the damage is 100% - no one will restore anything there, they are tormented to restore the equipment. And the crew is not at all a fact that from this station, And if from this one, most likely they saw a flying Lancet on the indicator screen, and galloped out of the cockpit even before it hit ...
  4. +12
    5 December 2022 18: 51
    Air defense should be the number one goal. If we knock out air defense, aviation will work more powerfully, and this is a huge plus for the RF Armed Forces.
  5. +10
    5 December 2022 18: 51
    It must have been a long time ago. The grass is green...
    1. +5
      5 December 2022 18: 58
      Quote: Jovanni
      It must have been a long time ago. The grass is green...

      Exactly! Nice spoon for dinner. It is necessary to show such things in time, and not like in the Middle Ages, when the news arrived with a delay of two or three months (at best).
    2. +1
      5 December 2022 18: 59
      This is an old video. Three months ago.
      1. +1
        5 December 2022 19: 02
        There are no leaves on the trees. So you see the beginning of the war.
      2. +3
        6 December 2022 11: 53
        There was a similar video in the summer, but different.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. 0
      5 December 2022 19: 56
      Quote: Jovanni
      It must have been a long time ago. The grass is green.

      But still nice. Remember the Ballad of Mother? Sofia Nasha Rotaru sang.
      Alexey, the countrymen shouted,
      Alex, they asked for a run.
      The frame was replaced, the son remained to live,
      He asks his mother about the son to repeat.
      And in the attack again he runs
      He is alive, healthy, not wounded, not killed.
  6. +5
    5 December 2022 18: 52
    I think I saw these videos about two months ago.
  7. 0
    5 December 2022 18: 53
    More such nice shots. good
  8. -1
    5 December 2022 18: 58
    Surely in the coming months Russia will stamp drones and more powerful too
  9. +1
    5 December 2022 18: 58
    Destroyed, well, no, most likely, it is undeniably damaged. The calculations are alive, the West will adjust the hardware so this is not new, the type of drone is not indicated, judging by the explosions, this is the Lancet, for sure, but not as powerful (as we would like), but still it is experience and positive experience.
    1. +2
      5 December 2022 19: 02
      Judging by the news of the last months ... there are more lancets ... to see the production capacity is expanding
    2. +8
      5 December 2022 19: 47
      Quote: Murmur 55
      Destroyed, well, no, most likely, it is undeniably damaged. The calculations are alive, the West will adjust the iron so this is not new
      P-18 is completely destroyed, along with the calculation. I served on an analogue of the P-12. Everything is the same there, except for the glass and a higher antenna. And the blow fell on the glass, and not on the antennas. This is the kirdyk of the entire station. The iron of the cabin is pierced with a knife. Not the best story with 36D6 either. The calculation survived because they saw that it was flying into it and jumped out, and the antenna was FAR there. Replace try when everything is rooted
  10. 0
    5 December 2022 19: 02
    Quote from Sith
    The lancet was clearly loitering ... and maybe they didn’t expect "such" a goal ... Well, that’s their point, to attack as soon as they see ... and it’s dangerous for aviation to fly near the radar .... it’s not just there stood ... obviously the command post and the launcher were within the communication radius

    Nobody minds, but I want to be sure
  11. +1
    5 December 2022 19: 04
    This is clearly not a December video. I had not seen it before, but nature is not winter. But it’s still nice, it’s a pity the destruction is not great, and most importantly, the calculation of 36D6 did not die ...
  12. +1
    5 December 2022 19: 11
    A warhead in a lancet may be enough for a UAZ or a motorcycle, but definitely not for such healthy things. Here you need something in between geranium and lancet
  13. +1
    5 December 2022 19: 26
    Quote: Last centurion
    A warhead in a lancet may be enough for a UAZ or a motorcycle, but definitely not for such healthy things. Here you need something in between geranium and lancet

    Then just send the second one.
  14. 0
    5 December 2022 19: 31
    Quote: Jovanni
    It must have been a long time ago. The grass is green...

    In the Kherson region, it is still green.
  15. +5
    5 December 2022 19: 35
    Quote: Venara
    This is clearly not a December video. I had not seen it before, but nature is not winter. But it’s still nice, it’s a pity the destruction is not great, and most importantly, the calculation of 36D6 did not die ...

    You probably hoped to see snowdrifts? This is the Kherson region. In the south of the Rostov region, for example, the grass is still green - there was no snow at all.
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. +2
    5 December 2022 19: 42
    It is clear that the charge is weak, well, you need to launch a couple to be sure.
  18. +1
    5 December 2022 19: 42
    The first one looks like my station P-12. It was already considered ancient during the years of my military service ... And that was already in 1970.
  19. 0
    5 December 2022 19: 47
    Quote from: Peter1First
    Oh, weak Lancetik! The damage is far from 100%, the whole crew is alive - There would be Geranium-2 - so there would definitely be no stone left unturned, including radar operators!

    Geranium has less accuracy. another guidance system - it can miss a few meters, but here it’s to the point, you can also taxi, unlike Geranium.
  20. -3
    5 December 2022 19: 55
    Today "unknown" drones attacked an airfield in Saratov, where Russian strategic bombers are based. Several aircraft were damaged. Perhaps the very planes on which our nuclear triad is based.
    This is some complete...
    Cant...

    In addition, according to Russian nuclear doctrine, an attack on the means of ensuring Russian nuclear power is a pretext for a retaliatory nuclear strike. But this, judging by the silence of the leadership, is unlikely ...
  21. +2
    5 December 2022 19: 56
    https://iz.ru/1435833/video/lantcety-porazhaiut-boevye-mashiny
    Full video...
    Z.Y. "I wonder why the MO did not demonstrate it" wink
    1. +2
      5 December 2022 20: 19
      Quote: Vigore
      https://iz.ru/1435833/video/lantcety-porazhaiut-boevye-mashiny
      Full video...
      Z.Y. "I wonder why the MO did not demonstrate it"

      Yes, it's definitely a Chewbacca... Camouflage - Sand/Pixel. Well, he sealed the S-300 ... but again - the pipes are safe and sound. The cart will be replaced...
    2. +1
      6 December 2022 10: 54
      Quote: Vigore
      Z.Y. "I wonder why the MO did not demonstrate it" wink

      Because the "lancets" did not hit the S-300 column a little. Even taking into account the fact that the first miss stopped the column.
  22. -2
    5 December 2022 20: 13
    The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation showed a video of the destruction of two Ukrainian radar stations by Russian drones
    . A bomb, 100 - 200 would have done it more radically, finally.
  23. -1
    5 December 2022 20: 15
    Firecrackers there or something in the combat unit ?! No visible fatal damage. And in the first case - the antenna did not even stop spinning ...
    More powerful charges on drones! In the end, this is not long-range aviation, damn it, these are front-line strikers, they don’t need to fly far, so it would be possible to throw another three or four kilograms of TNT on warheads!
  24. 0
    5 December 2022 20: 18
    A good but slightly weak weapon in my opinion. It seems he does not take the tank
  25. +1
    5 December 2022 20: 19
    I'll give you an unpopular opinion. It seems that non-combat-ready equipment was destroyed, which imitated the position of a radio engineering company. At the 9th second, both radars are visible in one frame. The place resembles an abandoned former ZTRB position (judging by the embankment and storage shed nearby). At the P-18 position, no one puts it next to diesel engines under one canopy (during the operation of a diesel engine and equipment, you will go deaf and you can’t go through the Fire Department). Also, the position is missing NRZ 1L22. At the 32nd second, it can be seen that the Dasha power trailer was placed according to the instructions, but the station is not working. She has a power supply of 400 Hz - it seems that in the village they could only connect the rotation of the P-18 (50 Hz) from the industrial network of low power. There is no diesel fuel roofing felts at all, diesel roofing felts are not used ... Judging by how calmly the calculation examines the damage, the video is mounted or a piece is cut out. The UAV operator had to aim not at the antenna canvas, but at the part of the trailer above the wheels, there is the equipment and R / M of the operator. In short, I don't...
    1. +3
      6 December 2022 12: 04
      In telegram channels, if there was no baba, then they immediately write, wooden, layout, etc. And you are in the same place, fire safety is not respected, the video is glued, no one does that - it's a hoax all around.
  26. -1
    5 December 2022 20: 34
    Magnificent impact. Great job Lancet
  27. 0
    5 December 2022 21: 05
    The work is good, b / h is weak. 7-10 kg with striking elements will reliably disable any radar, even blocks under the armor of the GMki, and irrevocably. It's easier to make a new one. 2-3 kg of explosives is for calculating guns or unarmored vehicles.
  28. Hey
    +2
    5 December 2022 21: 31
    And why was the first part of the video cut out, where the S-300 "Lancets" were hitting the column. And they smudge a little. Tolley a gust of wind, or the hand of the operator trembled.
  29. 0
    5 December 2022 23: 36
    Yes, well done. They brought beauty. The cameras now shoot well, you can clearly see the object and where it flies. So it must be so. Let them watch the video and be afraid ... After all, a hotel can fly to us!
  30. 0
    6 December 2022 06: 27
    "The military did not begin to clarify what type of loitering ammunition was used, showing only footage of the operators' combat work and its results." Fuck what a secret. Or the military themselves do not know what kind of ammunition arrived.
    1. 0
      6 December 2022 10: 56
      Quote: papas-57
      Fuck what a secret. Or the military themselves do not know what kind of ammunition arrived.

      Apparently, it was meant that they did not specify the modification of the Lancet. Because it is impossible to confuse this X-wing with something. smile
  31. -2
    6 December 2022 10: 46
    the Lancet is rather weak for this, these radars will be repaired and will work again, if there is nothing more powerful, then at least 2-3 lancets for one such target
  32. 0
    6 December 2022 15: 49
    Quote: Leshak
    Air defense should be the number one goal. If we knock out air defense, aviation will work more powerfully, and this is a huge plus for the RF Armed Forces.

    The idea is correct, but the Wild West will not allow it to be implemented. Up to the supply of their own air defense with their own operators.

    It is clear that their air defense is obviously worse than the air defense of the Russian Federation, but here it is not air defense that will fight against each other! :)
  33. 0
    7 December 2022 11: 12
    Let the Moscow Region better show a video of how they "fell in love" with two Tu-95s and one Tu-22M3!