The Kyiv regime is first of all trying to restore the power supply of the railways for military transport

The situation with energy supply against the background of the onset of winter in a number of regions of Ukraine continues to deteriorate. The Kyiv regime, having created “theatrical and staging” “points of indestructibility”, in some of which there is no light and communication, other people are hospitalized with carbon monoxide poisoning from the operation of diesel generators, the main force is thrown to restore the electricity supply to the railways.

The reason is clear. The regime needs to quickly restore military traffic by rail - the supply of military equipment, ammunition and the transfer of personnel. Also, Ukrainian power engineers are involved in attempts to restore a full-fledged power supply to enterprises that are capable of engaging in military-technical production and repair of weapons.

In Kyiv, the head of one of the largest Ukrainian energy operators, Sergei Kovalenko, said that in addition to rolling and emergency shutdowns, so-called "manual shutdowns" would also be applied. This option provides for power cuts in individual houses or entire neighborhoods by management companies or operators of housing maintenance offices.

Kovalenko:

Light in Kyiv can be turned off even in those houses that are powered by the same line with critical infrastructure - in order to save money.

On the eve of Kyiv Mayor Klitschko said that if a few days ago the level of provision of Kyiv with electricity was 50%, now it is 65-70%.

City hall of the Ukrainian capital:

At the beginning of the week, every second resident of Kiev experienced a blackout, now every third.

Serious problems with power supply almost throughout Ukraine: Ivano-Frankivsk, Kharkiv, Nikolaev, Rivne, Vinnitsa, etc.

Meanwhile, in Kyiv, the thermometer is already showing negative temperatures. Temperatures will drop to -6-8 Celsius overnight by early next week. The load on the power system increases exponentially.

Comments

[krops777]

The Kyiv regime is first of all trying to restore the power supply of the railways for military transport

Bomb, bomb and bomb again, forelocks must live in the 18th century, maybe this will come to an awareness of their place in history.

[dmi.pris1]

In the 18th century, they already lived well. Under the wing of Catherine. But a century earlier, when logs were atrocious there

[krops777]

In the 18th century, they already lived well.

Maybe not bad, but what the USSR gave them cannot even be compared.

[Plate]

Yes, even in the 19th century, everyone lived badly, because electricity did not enter the life of ordinary citizens. But, on the other hand, they do not like the Union, they do not like, apparently, the Empire as well ... In general, let them go to pre-Petrine times.
But all these are just slogans, which we ourselves will forget about after the NWO.

[oleg-nekrasov-19]

In the 18th century, Russians lived there quite well, resettled in the deserted steppes and fields of the Dnieper region from all over Mother Russia, then they were called Little Russians and a little later Austria-Hungary decided to call them Ukrainians, and such figures as Kulyash invented a language for them based on the Dnieper "surzhik", Don "gutar", Kuban "balachki" and the great and mighty Russian language.

[SKVichyakow]

The tactics used by our Defense Ministry shows the correctness of the chosen decision to strike again at the power supply centers after they are restored.

[Cat Alexandrovich]

And for those that work and do not require restoration, is it possible?

[vadimtt]

Especially for multi-section switchgear for 750 kV, it is very possible!

[Fedor Sokolov]

And our Ministry of Defense that we will sit and calmly watch how the enemy restores logistics to transport equipment and manpower to the theater of operations. Isn't it time to start building bridges across the Dnieper? It is simply necessary to finally cut off the left bank from the right one, otherwise the endless military flows will not stop.

[Uncle lee]

Quote: Fyodor Sokolov

Just needs to finally cut off

Cut off! By the most tomatoes!

[Uprun]

Campaign, while reloading ................ while recovering.

[Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov]

City hall of the Ukrainian capital:
At the beginning of the week, every second resident of Kiev experienced a blackout, now every third.

***
Experience comes with age...

***

[Corrosion inhibitor]

They need more problems! Even more !!
Miss this winter, comrade rocket scientists - that's all. Then there will be European integration for the whole next year, and another faggotization, too, will be.
And it turns out that, in the end, the missiles definitely fell, but - in vain ...
Do not allow this, comrades "rocketeers"! Those who are now looking at the map in the RF Ministry of Defense - I am turning to you.
Play to the fullest. Collapse should begin in the cities of Ukraine. According to any, first of all, favorable schedule for us.
Otherwise, for all your imperfections, you will have to pay with blood and a second mobilization.
Don't fail the service!

[Dedok]

And the picture is indicative: around the trance there is a parapet of sandbags...
Yes, it’s difficult to get into such conditions, I won’t be surprised that trances will block reinforced concrete products around, there will be few geraniums here ...

[aakvit]

But why? If you hit not from the side, but from above, then the flowers will be enough! Only this is exactly how it is necessary to hit, but is it possible or not, I don’t know, not an expert ...

[rotmistr60]

The regime needs to quickly restore military traffic by rail - the supply of military equipment, ammunition and the transfer of personnel

And this cannot be allowed. So, without regard to the lamentations of Europe, it is simply necessary to continue strikes, incl. and to save the lives of our soldiers.

[ratoborets]

The price of electricity produced at Ukrainian power plants is UAH 1.6 per kWh or 4 cents.
The price of electricity generated by a generator at 100% load, 25,18 rubles per kWh, or about 40 cents

First of all, we take into account the cost of purchasing the generator itself - we divide its cost by hours. 35000/5000 = 7 rubles/hour.
Then we calculate the cost of 1 kW at:
100% load: 2,5 l / h * 40 rubles / 5,5 kW = 18,18 rubles. Taking into account the cost of the generator, the total cost of a kWh will be 18,18 + 7 = 25,18 rubles.

The economics of war is simple:
1. Generators will not replace commercial-scale electricity generation from CHP/CHP/HPP/NPP.
2. Even if the needs are partially covered by generators, it will be ten times more expensive and will require a huge amount of fuel and lubricants needed by the Armed Forces of Ukraine at the front or for transportation.
3. Huge losses for the economy and, as a result, a weakening of the rear and, as a result, a weakening of the front.
4. It is one thing to repair equipment in Dnepropetrovsk or Kharkov 100-150 km from the front, as there is electricity. And it is quite another to transport military equipment across the country to Poland or Slovakia for repairs, and then back, which again requires electricity for transportation.

[solar]

Then we calculate the cost of 1 kW at:
100% load: 2,5 l/h

Fuel consumption in a conventional household gasoline or diesel generator is 0,2-0,5 liters per 1 kWh of electricity, depending on the type, power of the generator and its condition. In the inverter, the consumption is two times less.

For the production of one kilowatt / hour of electricity, a gasoline generator will use 0,35 liters of fuel (for a diesel generator, this figure is 0,2 liters).

https://www.sklad-generator.ru/informacija/statji/rashod-topliva-u-benzinovyh-generatorov/
That is, the cost of energy will be at least 5 times less than in your calculation.

3. Huge losses for the economy and, as a result, a weakening of the rear and, as a result, a weakening of the front.

The front rests on Western supplies, and its own military production in Ukraine is minimal.

will require a huge amount of fuel and lubricants needed by the Armed Forces of Ukraine at the front or for transportation.

At the moment, fuel is freely sold in Ukraine for household consumers, that is, it is all the more enough for the front.

4. It is one thing to repair equipment in Dnepropetrovsk or Kharkov 100-150 km from the front

There are enough generators for the repair of equipment and military needs in general, and a power outage does not affect this. But the fact that instead of bases for repairing military equipment, ammunition is used at substations is just convenient for them.

[Askold65]

Quote from solar

There are enough generators for the repair of equipment and military needs in general, and a power outage does not affect this. But the fact that instead of bases for repairing military equipment, ammunition is used at substations is just convenient for them.

The main task is to complicate railway logistics, and not to bomb small equipment repair points. There are some damages that require factory repair.
And also to spend additional funds (and Western friends too) to restore life support infrastructure.

[solar]

The main task is to complicate railway logistics,

This has already been tried in the spring - nothing happened.
Attacks on substations and thermal power plants do not lead to this either. Scarce expensive ammunition is not spent on military purposes. Kharkiv, Kherson - a direct consequence.

[Askold65]

Quote from solar

This has already been tried in the spring - nothing happened.
Attacks on substations and thermal power plants do not lead to this either.

That's it - they tried. And now they took on the real - with massive blows. The shortage of electricity in Ukraine is very noticeable.

Quote from solar

Scarce expensive ammunition is not spent on military purposes.

And who said that ammunition should only be used for military purposes? Russian expensive ammunition costs Ukraine many times more expensive. It is hard for you, as a resident of Ukraine, to admit it.
Dill, on the other hand, hit residential areas with scarce ammunition.

Quote from solar

Kharkiv, Kherson - a direct consequence.

Kharkov and Kherson are a direct consequence of the very much belated mobilization, which did not allow to condense the battle formations of troops and create reserves.
And also a consequence of the initial strategic miscalculation of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, which, instead of using limited forces to encircle the main, at that time, Donetsk group of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and cut them off from supplies, dispersed forces along the entire length of the border and bogged down in the suburbs of large cities. It was not necessary to go to Kyiv, Kharkov, Chernihiv and Kherson, but first it was necessary to deal with the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Donbas. But most likely it is not the General Staff itself that is to blame, but the political leadership.

[solar]

Electricity shortage in Ukraine is very noticeable

And what, it destroyed the rail logistics of military transportation? Yes, even ordinary passenger buses run according to the usual schedule.

And who said that ammunition should only be used for military purposes?

In fact, the Geneva Convention of 1949 and its additions said this.
But even if we leave the convention aside, spending ammunition, which is not enough for military strikes on civilians, is at least stupid. Unless if you are not able to hit military targets, and even that is debatable.

Kharkov and Kherson are a direct consequence of the very much belated mobilization, which did not allow to condense the battle formations of troops and create reserves.

This is a consequence of the fact that there were not enough opportunities to weaken everything with strikes on military targets - everything went to civilian ones. And there were enough people in Kherson.

[Askold65]

Quote from solar

And what, it destroyed the rail logistics of military transportation? Yes, even ordinary passenger buses run according to the usual schedule.

Not at all, but there were interruptions.
Here, a resident of Kharkov testifies.
"After the recent blackout due to a hit on the power grid, many trains were canceled. Some trains were up to 12 hours late. So taking the train is not an option right now. I want to try the bus option today"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80n-E6xqOj8

Quote from solar

In fact, the Geneva Convention of 1949 and its additions said this.

There he is - at last they remembered the Geneva Convention: "And what are we for!"?

The strikes on the energy infrastructure of Ukraine that began on October 10, in contrast to the one-time operation on April 23-25, were not specifically focused on damaging the railway, but already on November 17, interruptions began on it.
It was possible to restore the movement in 7-10 days, but after each new blow, new problems arose.
The reason is obvious - 45% of Ukrainian railways are electrified, and this applies to both latitudinal Lviv - Dnepropetrovsk) and meridional (Kyiv - Odessa) passages. That is, interruptions in energy relate to the most important areas in which military cargo is transported. In fact, they cover the entire railway, since infrastructure automation (points, semaphores, signaling, etc.) are powered from the same power system.
Railway transport expert Sergey Sigachev (author of the Periscope Notebook telegram channel) says in an interview with RTVI about the Ukrainian railway: “The railway is a STRATEGIC complex, and it definitely has military significance. I would estimate it like this: somewhere around 70% to 30%. Where 70% is military value, and 30% is civilian evacuation transportation to the West.

Quote from solar

This is a consequence of the fact that there were not enough opportunities to weaken everything with strikes on military targets - everything went to civilian ones.

Nonsense is complete. You also write here that the Russians spent all the ammunition in schools, kindergartens and hospitals. All your media howled howling on this topic.
In reality, the Russian Armed Forces carried out strikes on the places of deployment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which often used civilian objects for military purposes, and therefore represented a legitimate target. The Geneva Convention treats this as such.

However, since an object becomes military not due to its intrinsic properties, but in connection with its use by the enemy, it should be determined what is a military object. It should be emphasized that there are no objects that would be exclusively civilian or military: it all depends on the influence exerted one object or another in the course of hostilities. Therefore, any objects, even those that enjoy special protection <20>, can become military objects, and therefore legitimate targets of attack. Thus, military objects can be both objects specially created for military use (military equipment, ammunition factories, military equipment depots, etc.) and civilian objects (a residential building or a bridge become military objects by virtue of their tactical use by the defending side).

It is not enough to strike at military targets alone. This is just a factor of influence, or fire support, which is carried out in the interests of the strategic and operational-tactical plans of the operation. And not vice versa.
I repeat once again, from the very beginning, the RF Armed Forces had to move at a fast pace in converging directions immediately behind the backs of the Donetsk group of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, at the same time forming an outer ring of encirclement. In the very south, it will stop along the left bank of the Dnieper and take up defense. At the same time, it was necessary to immediately begin the "call-up of reservists", those who had recently served in parts of the Russian Federation. And even more so, immediately after the failure and withdrawal of troops from near Kyiv and Chernigov. Putin chewed snot right up to September. And to inflict massive strikes on the energy sector of Ukraine only after the terrorist attack on the Crimean bridge

[solar]

In reality, the Russian Armed Forces carried out strikes on the places of deployment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which were often used, including civilian objects, for military purposes.

Well, yes, they were sitting at the substations. this is absolutely complete nonsense.

Not at all, but there were interruptions.

of course, immediately after the direct impact, there were some small interruptions, some trains were late, and high-speed ones were replaced with ordinary sleeping ones.
All this was quickly restored. Passenger as went on schedule, and go. What can we say about military cargo transportation.

the Russians spent all the ammunition on schools, kindergartens and hospitals

Yes, Kherson was simply leaked from an excess of blows to the sun.

And to inflict massive strikes on the energy sector of Ukraine only after the terrorist attack on the Crimean bridge

Yes. When it became clear to everyone that the NWO had gone completely wrong, Kharkov was leaked, Kherson was leaked, mobilization was announced - you need to somehow distract the people from the "successes of the NWO" (however, Lavrov today openly announced that this was a war from the very beginning, all sorts of propaganda NWO can be discarded). And since there are no military successes, at least something needs to be done. That's what they do.

[Askold65]

Quote from solar

Well, yes, they were sitting at the substations. this is absolutely complete nonsense.

And that many substations were bombed at the beginning of the NWO? There were no mass arrivals, as in October-November. Even before the NWO, substations and residential areas of Donetsk were shelled repeatedly. This is one of the other reasons for starting SWO.

Quote from solar

of course, immediately after the direct impact, there were some small interruptions,

Not some, but quite specific. But it's not over yet, I hope. It's time to strike at generating capacities (except for nuclear power plants) and control points of the energy system. And Putin all the time "kneads his boobs" - he already got it with his humanism and half-measures.

Quote from solar

Yes, Kherson was simply leaked from an excess of blows to the sun.

I repeat once again (how much is it possible already?) Kherson was surrendered due to a lack of infantry in the trenches. There, for this reason, the paratroopers have been holding the defense without rotation and replenishment since March. If there were initially as many troops as needed for the offensive, then the Armed Forces of Ukraine would be thrown back so far. that no "Haymars" would reach the Antonovsky Bridge. And I will repeat my thesis again - it was a mistake with such a meager number of troops to go beyond the Dnieper. I had to stop and dig in. And deal with the Donetsk group.

Quote from solar

Yes. When it became clear to everyone that the NWO had gone completely wrong, Kharkov was leaked, Kherson was leaked, mobilization was announced, but you need to somehow distract the people from the "successes of the NWO"

These are all consequences, not the cause of the failures of the NWO. The reason is the inadequacy of the political leadership from the very beginning of the NWO, who decided to achieve their goals with a swoop, with small forces, with little blood and destruction in Ukraine. Excessive humanism and half-measures in conducting military operations have never brought anyone to good. If they had acted tough and decisively from the very beginning, with the removal of ALL communications, at least, for a start, in the left-bank Ukraine, then now the situation would be completely different. This is what the people of Russia did not understand, calling it a "strange military operation." The people have long been giving signals to the authorities with might and main ---- to start, finally, to fight back in March. Putin stirred only when the fried cock pecked. And then again in his style of half-measures.

[solar]

And that many substations were bombed at the beginning of the NWO?

If from the very beginning substations had been bombed instead of military facilities, then the fighting would have gone differently, and "gestures of goodwill" would have been not once a month, but weekly.

The reason is the inadequacy of the political leadership from the very beginning of the NWO, who decided to achieve their goals with a swoop, with small forces, with little blood and destruction in Ukraine.

Which were reported so vaguely that it is still not clear - what are these goals and how feasible are they in principle? Or is it just a "small victorious war" started voluntaristically, which went wrong due to gross errors in assessing the situation due to the incompetence of the leadership?
To report, for example, that in the event of the introduction of troops there will be massive assistance from the West, this is a direct matter for Lavrov. Did you hear about it in his speech?

If they had acted tough and decisively from the very beginning, with the removal of ALL communications, at least, for starters, in left-bank Ukraine

It's just not realistic, you don't understand the scope of the task. It was not possible to suppress air defense, and it is unrealistic in principle to do this purely with missiles.

[Askold65]

Quote from solar

If from the very beginning substations had been bombed instead of military facilities, then the fighting would have gone differently, and "gestures of goodwill" would have been not once a month, but weekly.

Let's rewind a little higher:

The main task is to complicate railway logistics,))))))
-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------
...... they already tried to do this in the spring - nothing happened.
...... This is a consequence of the fact that there were not enough opportunities to weaken the force with strikes on military targets - everything went to civilian ones.

Then you write that civilians bombed instead of military facilities in the spring, and now you write:

If from the very beginning, instead of military facilities, substations were bombed, then .....

Have you mixed up anything in your conclusions?

Quote from solar

Which were reported so vaguely that it is still not clear - what are these goals and how feasible are they in principle?

The goals are clear and understandable for those who WANT to understand it. The main thing is the protection of the population of Donbass by eliminating the military machine of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Everything else is already on the way. We seem to have already talked about this topic.
How feasible it is, I don't know. But according to the scheme that I wrote about above, there was quite a chance. Especially if you immediately carry out mobilization in waves, achieving numerical superiority over the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The mobilization capabilities of the Russian Federation are 4-5 times higher than those of Ukraine. And this advantage should have been used from the very beginning.
Can you imagine if your Armed Forces of Ukraine with a strength of 700 thousand (or how many there?) were opposed by at least 1 million RF Armed Forces in the month of September. And behind the back of the Armed Forces of Ukraine there would be a broken power industry, broken communication centers (hardware centers with servers), the main military production facilities, etc.

Quote from solar

Or is it just a "small victorious war" started voluntaristically, which went wrong due to gross errors in assessing the situation due to the incompetence of the leadership?

Yes it is. But excessive humanism towards the "fraternal people" also took place.

To report, for example, that in the event of the introduction of troops there will be massive assistance from the West, this is a direct matter for Lavrov. Did you hear about it in his speech?

Well, it will be. All of this and so without him guessed. What difference would it make if he said that?

Quote from solar

It's just not realistic, you don't understand the scope of the task. It was not possible to suppress air defense, and it is unrealistic in principle to do this purely with missiles.

It was possible, if you did not spend expensive missiles on strikes at all sorts of "Yavor training grounds" and kindergartens - barracks and other low-value objects, slamming there several dozens of dryers and mercenaries.
Monumental bridges across the Dnieper are unlikely to collapse, but it was quite possible to hit small bridges across small rivers on the left-bank Ukraine, as well as energy and railway infrastructure. That is, to work as much as possible in the interests of our group operating in the Donbas, cutting off the supply of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. But our "strategists" not only sprayed the units involved, they also spent missiles on insignificant military installations.

[solar]

Have you mixed up anything in your conclusions?

nothing. The strikes on logistics were carried out as part of strikes on military targets. This particular type of influence, taken among other military ones, showed its ineffectiveness from a military point of view. Now the strikes in the vast majority of cases are not even in terms of logistics, but the effectiveness from a military point of view is zero, more precisely, negative.
As for the purpose of the invasion...
1. Fighting the growing influence of NATO.
The result is negative - two more countries joined NATO, Ukraine also took this path, the NATO military got as close as possible to Moscow.
2. "Denazification of Ukraine"
The result is negative - the Zelensky government and the Ukrainian authorities in general received the maximum support of the population, their influence has grown greatly. Azov and other national battalions have become national heroes.
3. "Demilitarization"
The result is negative - the Armed Forces of Ukraine have never had such a level as now, both in terms of armament and combat readiness.
4. Protection of the LDNR.
The result is negative - prosperous before the outbreak of hostilities, Mariupol, Popasnaya and other cities of Donbass are destroyed or on the verge of survival. Donetsk came under shelling, which was not even close before.
5. Weakening of the Armed Forces of Ukraine by destroying the logistics of Western supplies, carried out through attacks on civilian infrastructure and energy networks.
The result is negative - no logistics is destroyed, strikes that use expensive ammunition give a very short-term and limited effect for civilians, creating temporary inconvenience, embittering the population against Russia, but for the Armed Forces of Ukraine - there is no effect, no effect at all. As for the supply of weapons for the Armed Forces of Ukraine from the West, they intensified as a result of shelling and switched to modern models of Western weapons, primarily air defense.
The conclusion is that the late Chernomyrdin was right in assessing the current situation (although he did not know about it, and could not even imagine that this was possible) -

We wanted the best, but it turned out as always!

[Askold65]

Quote from solar

The strikes on logistics were carried out as part of strikes on military targets. This particular type of influence, taken among other military ones, showed its ineffectiveness from a military point of view. Now the strikes in the vast majority of cases are not even in terms of logistics, but the effectiveness from a military point of view is zero, more precisely, negative.

1. Logistics is primarily a transport infrastructure. In the initial phase, there were practically no strikes on logistics. They were not applied MASSIVELY, and even more so in terms of energy - so as not to "cause unnecessary suffering" to the "fraternal people" (there were several one-time cases, no more). I don't know what civilian objects you mean, on which, allegedly, purposefully shelled the RF Armed Forces. Civil real estate used by the Armed Forces of Ukraine does not count - these are legitimate purposes. Defense industry enterprises and even more so.
2.

Quote from solar

The fight against the growing influence of NATO.
The result is negative - two more countries joined NATO, Ukraine also took this path, the NATO military got as close as possible to Moscow.

Firstly, no other two countries have yet joined NATO, but long before the NWO they were preparing the ground for such a decision (their politicians were asked to forget the opinion of the people). It was only a matter of time.
Secondly, in Ukraine this is even more unlikely, in which these "Wishlist" stumbled upon their territorial problems (Crimea, primarily the Donbass). Ukraine was prepared as a bargaining chip in the fight against Russia without directly getting involved in a conflict with unpredictable consequences. The result is negative for Russia, for Europe, and even more so for Ukraine. The main beneficiary is the US, which is understood even in the EU.

3.

Quote from solar

"Denazification of Ukraine"
The result is negative - the Zelensky government and the Ukrainian authorities in general received the maximum support of the population, their influence has grown greatly. Azov and other national battalions have become national heroes.

These "Azovs" and other national battalions are the last of Adolf Hitler, Stefan Bandera, Roma Shukhevych and other scum, whom the Ukrainian authorities have glorified for 30 years and with the full PURPOSED support of the West. (See paragraph 2) brought the Ukrainian people before the war with Russia
The Ukrainian people fully share the same fate as the Germans who brought their Nazis to power in 1941.
4.

Quote from solar

Protection of the LDNR.
The result is negative - prosperous before the outbreak of hostilities, Mariupol, Popasnaya and other cities of Donbass are destroyed or on the verge of survival. Donetsk came under shelling, which was not even close before.

Let's start with Donetsk. Donetsk and Luhansk did not want to fall under the Nazi Bandera Ukraine, which it turned into as a result of a coup d'état in 2014. A civil war began in Ukraine, and these republics, with the support of Russia, managed to fight back. As a result of the unsuccessful war, Ukraine had to sign the Minsk agreements, which were considered temporary in Kuev and began preparations for a new war. And with the advent of Zelensky, they openly declared that these agreements no longer suit them and began to transfer troops to the demarcation line, which directly contradicted the Minsk agreements. Russia, under the guise of exercises, also began to transfer troops closer to the border, making it clear. that Donbas will not give offense. What caused a real hysteria in the West - Russia, de, wants to attack Ukraine in order to enslave the young "independent" state and other crap. Thus exerting pressure to achieve the withdrawal of Russian troops and create favorable conditions for the Armed Forces of Ukraine during the invasion of Donbas. I have already explained this to you before - but you are clearly not one of those who WANT TO UNDERSTAND THIS.
Mariupol is the base of the Nazis "Azov" and had to be stormed. You probably don't know, but these "new heroes of Ukraine" were covered by the civilians of the city, whom they did not release using them as a human shield. They were not in any category of national heroes in this city, and even more so after what happened. We will restore Mariupol.
Donetsk was shelled regularly with varying degrees of intensity, but after the recognition of these republics by Russia and the resumption of the b / d shelling from the dill increased MUCH times. Including MLRS systems for residential areas, and this is a direct violation of the Geneva Convention. Which you yourself admitted.
5. The fact that the Armed Forces of Ukraine have strengthened due to Western supplies is indisputable. But this is a consequence of the lack of SVO from the very beginning, when the supply of NATO weapons was just unfolding and the Russian leadership for some reason took care of the Ukrainian infrastructure. But the MAIN reason is an incorrectly chosen strategy and a very, very belated mobilization, which again for some reason was limited to 300 thousand people.
On the embittered population of Ukraine to the Russians, after what they turned their Ukraine into after 2014, a big BOLT. Remember this yourself and pass it on to your other fellow citizens.

[ratoborets]

Fuel consumption in a conventional household gasoline or diesel generator is 0,2-0,5 liters per 1 kWh of electricity, depending on the type, power of the generator and its condition.

That is, the cost of energy will be at least 5 times less than in your calculation.

Firstly, I took the calculations from the official website of the manufacturer of power equipment SKAT. They understand this better than yours and mine.
Secondly, they cannot be reproached for the fact that in their calculations they are trying to overestimate fuel consumption ... to someone, but it is not profitable for them. Why scare off buyers?
Thirdly and most importantly, 2,5 l / h is the generator consumption per hour, and not per 1 kWh. When calculating, we divide by the power of the generator 5.5 kW:

Then we calculate the cost of 1 kW at:
100% load: 2,5 l / h * 40 rubles / 5,5 kW = 18,18 rubles.

and we get the cost of production of 1 kWh.

At the same time, the price of fuel in the calculations is incredibly low. There are no such prices for gasoline or diesel anywhere.

[polk26l]

The destruction of Ukrainian infrastructure must be significantly increased! This, at the moment of the crossroads, is the most effective method of defeating the enemy, taking into account his material and technical support!

[sgr291158]

It is necessary to finish the remaining energy structure.

[Vladimir M]

It is unlikely that they will go for the complete finishing off of the energy structure of Ukraine. If only because the partners need to pump oil, gas ...., and electricity is needed to load grain. And this is sacred. And the fact that the population will sit in cold apartments, without electricity and without a livelihood for Zelensky and his curators is even better. The population will go to the Armed Forces of Ukraine faster, the population, by and large, will not have a choice. Conclusion: it is necessary to completely take out the energy system, otherwise there will be less pluses than minuses for us.

[ratoborets]

Those who were burning with the desire to go "kill orcs" could have done it a hundred times already. If they sit in "huts", but in apartments, then they have no desire to sit in a wet cold trench, fight and be killed.
- women and children will leave
- Men's gyrus will begin to work hard, how to go abroad.

If only because the partners need to pump oil, gas ...., and electricity is needed to load grain. And this is sacred.

Here you are, unfortunately, most likely right.
I hope that the top management will understand that it is better to act tough and at least once spit on "respectable partners", having successfully completed the SVO on horseback.

[Vladimir M]

The worst thing is that the population (even those who were waiting for us) will be pulled into the Armed Forces of Ukraine. And he will justify this to himself by the fact that he went to defend his homeland and he himself believes in it. And will fight accordingly. If in the 14-15 years they fled en masse and abandoned their equipment, now this is not the case. It turns out they have a motivation and they believe in it. And it's not money.

[Eva Star]

Strikes on the infrastructure should have been delivered from the first days, it was possible to save many lives of our soldiers. Now the destruction of infrastructure should be in the first place in the NWO. It is also not bad to consider the nodal sewer junction of the city of Lviv as a target. The effect of destroying it will be much stronger than a power outage.

[your vsr 66-67]

the main forces throws on the restoration of electricity supply to the railways.

Don't let them do this! Let them transfer equipment, people and equipment on oxen and along the paths, like their primitive ancestors!

[Yaro Polk]

well ... let them .. sweat .. but restore ... in two hours, denazify the fascist piece of iron again

[APASUS]

If you do not give light, then the regime may not survive until spring. Energy is not only for transport, everything is connected there, including food, heating, food storage and production.
But when the rations are reduced, it is no longer garbage to burn in barrels .................

[Mascot]

Will it be possible to restore it? How long?

[Boniface]

Pig, "dug" another sea)))

Crimea has become a Russian island!

[fa2998]

And what is glowing west of Crimea in the open sea? The luminosity spot is equal to Kyiv and Sevastopol. Immediately suspicion of such "pictures".

[Boniface]

Well, yes, there are no inscriptions on the planet at all!

[solar]

Everything is easier. With the outbreak of hostilities throughout Ukraine, a curfew was introduced at night and blackout. Therefore, street lighting is not visible. And this demotivator is a common manipulation.

[tun5t]

They already have the stigma of traitors to Russia, this stigma can be seen even in heaven, and Vanga said long before the events, and everyone knows how they treat traitors - dog death to dogs! Only in the Kremlin loot in front of their eyes and they don’t see shit!

[Carlos Hall]

Attacks on energy infrastructure must continue. Produce cheap drones to saturate and wear down your defenses, and produce advanced missiles to bypass your future defenses and keep hitting. Without energy supply, Ukraine will sign any conditions of the Kremlin