The defeat of the Polish army at Pereyaslav: Taras night

33
The defeat of the Polish army at Pereyaslav: Taras night
Joseph Brand. Return of the winners (Cossack with a flag)


Fedorovich's uprising


Kurukovo agreement of 1625 (Battle of Kuruk Lake) did not become a stable basis for relations between Poland and the Zaporozhian Sich. At the end of 1625, a large detachment of Cossacks, led by Hetman Olifer, who were not included in the new register, "departed" to the Crimea. Hetman Mikhail Doroshenko, contrary to the agreement with the Poles, pursued an independent policy with the Crimea and Moscow. The hetman organized a campaign of the Cossacks in the Crimea to support Khan Mehmed III Giray and his Kalga brother Shahin Giray, who fought against the pro-Turkish party.



In turn, the Polish authorities and nobles continued their attack on the Cossacks. The Cossacks were given stern orders not to touch the Ottomans and the Crimean Tatars. The authorities pressed the registered, purged those who were considered unreliable. This caused new uprisings.

A new big uprising was raised by Taras Fedorovich (Taras Shake). By origin, the Tatar Hassan-Hassan, converted to Orthodoxy. As a "chief colonel" he led a detachment of Cossacks during the Thirty Years' War. Fought on the side of the Habsburgs. The army of Shaker received the name "Cossack cavalry and infantry." Since 1625 Korsun colonel. Since 1629 Zaporozhye hetman.

At this time, the Polish authorities decided to place permanent garrisons on the territory of the Cossacks. In the spring of 1630, the Cossacks revolted. Fedorovich led the Cossacks to the north, and executed the hetman of the registered Cossacks Grigory Cherny, who refused to support the uprising. The ataman turned to the people with universals, called on the people to revolt against the gentry. The rebellion of the Cossacks resulted in a broad anti-Polish uprising. The rebellious peasants sacked the estates of the gentry, killed the owners, who did not have time to escape, burned documents.

Tarasov night


In April-May 1630, the uprising covered a large territory of Little Rus'. The Cossacks defeated the Poles near Korsun, liberated Korsun, Kanev, Pereyaslav and other cities. Pereyaslav became a stronghold of the rebels. The Cossacks held the crossings across the Dnieper and, in case of failure, could retreat to the territory of the Russian kingdom.

Against the rebels from Bar, a Polish army was sent under the command of Stanislav Konetspolsky and Samuil Lasch. The Polish cavalry was reinforced by German mercenary infantry. The Poles defeated several settlements, crossed the Dnieper and laid siege to Pereyaslav. Shaking led his detachments to the city and entrenched himself in the camp between Trubezh and Alta. The Cossacks repulsed the Polish attacks.

May 15 (25) was included in history like Taras night or Pereyaslav night. During the Catholic feast of the Body and Blood of Christ, the Poles got drunk and neglected the precautions. The Cossacks staged a night sortie, which ended in complete success. A massacre began, the Poles fled in panic, many drowned. All artillery and convoy were captured by the Cossacks.

Konetspolsky was forced to seek an agreement with the Cossack officers. The Cossack elite, "chivalry", considered themselves equal to the gentry and wanted to achieve the same liberties from the king. Like, the gentry carries out military service, and for this it owns lands and peasants. Cossacks are also warriors and serve the king and state. Why don't they have the same "freedoms" as the pans?

The Cossack foreman accumulated wealth captured during campaigns, acquired land and servants. Rich Cossacks began to resemble the gentry. Moreover, many wealthy Cossacks understood the importance of education for the future of their children. They sent their children to Polish, Jesuit schools. There was a gradual Polonization (Westernization) of the Cossack elite, which became the basis for the future "Ukrainization".

Foreign languages, Latin, fashion, etiquette and habits were mastered. The Cossack foreman, in fact, no longer differed from the gentry, except for one thing - the new social group in the Polish high society was not legally formalized. Naturally, this called for strong irritation of the Cossacks and attempts to resolve the issue by diplomatic and military means.

Therefore, the Cossack foreman easily agreed with Konetspolsky. According to the Pereyaslav agreement of 1630, the Cossack register increased from 6 to 8 thousand people, it included part of the wealthy Cossacks. The Cossacks received the right to choose their hetman. Cossacks not included ("inscribed") in the register had to go home. Timofey Orendarenko was elected the new hetman, who led the Cossack army in the service of the Polish crown during the Smolensk War.

Shaking, dissatisfied with this agreement, was deposed from the post of hetman. Fedorovich left for the Sich. Later he joined the service of the Russian government and left with part of the Cossacks to the Don.
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    2 December 2022 05: 58
    "... Tymofiy Orendarenko was elected the new hetman,
    who led the Cossack army in the service of the Polish crown during the Smolensk War ... "- and they went to dig the Black Sea ...
    1. +1
      2 December 2022 16: 40
      The sea was dug out long before our era. And Black and Caspian, and poured the Caucasus with Mount Ararat.
    2. 0
      4 February 2023 19: 41
      You are mistaken, the Ukrainians dug out the Black Sea, which was therefore called the Russian Sea, two thousand years before the events described
  2. 0
    2 December 2022 21: 31
    Nice time! Free people Cossacks.
  3. The comment was deleted.
    1. +1
      3 December 2022 02: 21
      Quote: Reptiloid1977
      until 1654 Polonization was going on in Ukraine, due to the collapse of Kievan Rus, after Russification due to the capture of Muscovy.

      When the Poles captured Lvov and very vast territories around the city in the 14th century, they called the lands Russian Voivodship, without worrying, after the people who lived there. So Polonization was, Russification of Russians is nonsense. Over time, the Russians in the west of the territory of present-day Ukraine ceased to perceive themselves as Russians, but only as Ukrainians, residents of the border lands. Nevertheless, they are Russians, although they probably made fun of the Poles, which is quite normal, because they were under Polish occupation for a very long time.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. 0
          3 December 2022 15: 50
          Quote: Reptiloid1977
          Not nonsense.

          What if we remember history?
          Quote: Reptiloid1977
          So after more than 300 years of Polonization

          Forget about the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which owned most of Ukraine until 1568. Poland, only from 1392 belonged only to Lvov, Galicia (Ivanofrankivsk region) and a small western part of Khmelnitsky and Ternopil. ALL! The rest was Lithuania with Orthodoxy and Western Russian lingua franca. After 1568 and the transfer of central Ukraine and Kyiv to Poland, nothing has changed in relation to religion and language either.
          The only thing is that the Russian gentry could choose VOLUNTARY Polonization. (democracy sir), but most of the nobility de facto avoided this (to be with the breadwinner of the people and with the master rabbit, remember Dmitry Vishnevetsky)
          Only after the Union of Brest in 1596 did a more active Polonization of all strata and pressure on Orthodoxy begin. But Kyiv was not touched, they were afraid that it would bang.
          AND! what an accident! It was from this moment that frequent popular uprisings began precisely against the implementation of Polish laws, the division of the population into adherents and supporters of Catholicism and Orthodoxy began.
          When it's all over (polanization).
          The first section of the Commonwealth speech of 1772, sort of. Part of Poland and Ukraine remained semi-free, but to put pressure on Orthodoxy and the language - you will get it in the teeth.
          And they did get it in 1793. When almost everything was taken from them.
          And yes. Western Ukraine with Lvov, Bukovina and Galicia went to Austria-Hungary in 1774. And the Austrians already had Orthodox under them, and they understood that it was better not to joke with this.
          No wonder they planted the Archbishop of Bukovina, Romania and Dalmatia in Chernivtsi.
          Total. A maximum of 370 years of "Polonization" in Lviv and Galicia (up to 10% of modern Ukrainians) Up to 100 years the rest of Ukraine, which took place in constant fights against it.
          PS. And do not forget that Turkey owned most of the right bank for more than 60 years.
          1. 0
            4 February 2023 19: 52
            I would like to press, the full name is "The Grand Duchy of Lithuania, Russian and Zhemoytskoe." But the words Ukraine or underbaked "Ukrainians" do not sound at all
        2. 0
          3 December 2022 16: 37
          A little more about Polonization.
          The modern Ukrainian language is based on the dialects of the upper and middle Dnieper, up to the Dniester to the right and to the Slobozhanshchina to the left. These are Poltava, Cherkassy, ​​Kyiv, Vinnitsa, Pereyaslav Slobozhanshchina itself.
          The fact that the Poles for a couple of decades have been popping up to Poltava and Sloboda on the left bank of the Dnieper only in armor and diapers is not a secret (and ticked back on the first occasion). Kyiv, Cherkassy, ​​Pereyaslav ... they were also not particularly favored, and the Uniate churches did not take root there from the word at all. And there could be no question of any "polanization" in these territories, among the "deep people".
          In all these regions, the children of peasants and "burghers" were taught by Orthodox priests.
          What kind of "cruel Polonization" over the centuries and the artificiality of the Ukrainian (Western Russian) language can we talk about?
          Historical and natural dialect of East Slavic - yes. Just like Polish differs from Czech and Slotsak.
          1. -1
            3 December 2022 23: 00
            Quote: haron
            The modern Ukrainian language is based on the dialects of the upper and middle Dnieper, up to the Dniester to the right and to the Slobozhanshchina to the left. These are Poltava, Cherkassy, ​​Kyiv, Vinnitsa, Pereyaslav Slobozhanshchina itself.

            The Ukrainian language was developed under the control of the Austro-Hungarian intelligence, which instructed its hirelings to take all modern terms not from Russian, close to the Ukrainian language, but from any others where these terms do not look like Russian. Therefore, the technical Ukrainian language is now half dead. It is problematic to obtain modern information using it. Higher education in Ukrainian is convenient for the Ukrainian elite, who teach their children in English. And in Ukrainian they teach their serfs and laborers.
            1. 0
              4 December 2022 14: 12
              Quote: gsev
              The Ukrainian language was developed under the control of the Austro-Hungarian intelligence,

              ))) And indeed the truth. And I thought that this version is just a joke of marginals.
              Poor fellow Kotlyarevsky did not even know that he was writing the Aeneid in a language that had not yet been invented by the intelligence of a country that did not yet exist.
              1. 0
                4 December 2022 20: 14
                Quote: haron
                Poor fellow Kotlyarevsky didn’t even know that he was writing the Aeneid in a language that had not yet been invented by the country’s intelligence

                The Ukrainian language developed from the Russian dialect, however, under the influence of the Austrian special services. Evidence of this are technical terms that appeared before the beginning of the 20th century. They are borrowed from German and French, although by that time there were also Russian terms close to them. If you write Taras Shevchenko's poems in accordance with modern Russian grammar, then his poems are very easy to read for any Russian. The abstruse Austrian grammar for the Ukrainian language with 3 letters "i" is designed specifically to break the Ukrainian dialect from the Russian language.
                1. 0
                  5 December 2022 09: 19
                  Quote: gsev
                  They are borrowed from German and French, although by that time there were also Russian terms close to them.

                  For example, the word "barrier", "machine", "rotor", "compass bar", "parallax" .... or even "tank")))) ... thousands of them))
            2. 0
              4 December 2022 14: 24
              Quote: gsev
              Therefore, the technical Ukrainian language is now half dead. It is problematic to obtain modern information using it. Higher education in Ukrainian is convenient for the Ukrainian elite, who teach their children in English. And in Ukrainian they teach their serfs and farm laborers.

              You see, there is such a science as history. Simply put, it deals with the definition, study and evaluation of the facts that have occurred.
              So. More than a hundred years ago, two Czech scientists (Palacky and Jirasek) created a complete German-Czech dictionary. At that time (the end of the 19th century) in the universities of Austria-Hungary they taught only in German (Czech was banned in universities in 1620) and naturally there were no many technical terms in living and colloquial Czech.
              They took as a basis Old Slavic, Polish, Russian and!!! Attention! Russian languages.
              And since 1905, the words letadlo - an airplane, vozidlo - a car, sostrug - metalworking machines .... and many other technical words with Slavic roots appeared in Czech technical.
              And now what? You will forbid the Czechs to use these words, or you will laugh at them - but they do not care what you think about this. Or attack them because of it?
              At the expense of convenience for the elite ..... this is such a joke. Do they teach English in Baumanka? Or for laborers in Russian?
              At least think about what you write. The VO resource is open to the whole world, and such words do not bring Russia much benefit.
              1. +1
                4 December 2022 20: 27
                Quote: haron
                then it is engaged in the definition, study and evaluation of the facts that have occurred.
                So. More than a hundred years ago, two Czech scientists (Palacky and Jirasek) created a complete German-Czech dictionary.

                In Czech schools, in history lessons, teachers simply said that the "awakeners" had actually created a new language. By the 19th century, there was practically a dialect of the German language in use in the Czech Republic.
                You will forbid the Czechs to use these words, or you will laugh at them
                The fact is simply stated that the Czech Republic, having less than 300-700 million people speaking the Czech language, is experiencing big problems with the translation of scientific and technical literature into its language. After the collapse of the USSR and the exit of its half of the population from the Russian cultural world, it is impossible to study electronics, electrics and programming in Russian fully. Ukraine until 2014 had a Ukrainian secondary school and higher education in Russian. Translating education into Ukrainian, Ukraine will inevitably be forced to translate education into English. For example, in Japan and South Korea, some universities teach in English. The reason is the same. These peoples are not numerous enough to have a full-fledged higher education in their native language.
                1. 0
                  5 December 2022 09: 15
                  Quote: gsev
                  The fact is simply stated that the Czech Republic, having less than 300-700 million people speaking the Czech language, is experiencing big problems with the translation of scientific and technical literature into its language.

                  The Czechs were completely, and from 1620 to 1918, partly the titular nation in the territory where they began to change, also technical terms "invented" by the Germans in a Slavic way. Well, there was no steam locomotive back in 1620 (vlak - in Czech, zug - in German). They revived (or created ... it doesn't matter) their state. The language issue, it was a "reaction" to Germanization.
                  Quote: gsev
                  Translating education into Ukrainian, Ukraine will inevitably be forced to translate education into English.

                  I don’t know about the inevitable translatability into English. Maybe you are right. I have a couple of days of appointments at the polyclinic in Prague, so absolutely all students of any nationality speak fluent English. Like it or not, in order to adopt experience or advance your experience, you need a lingua franca. Even Chinese students speak English.
                  Ukraine has another problem, many universities and teachers invent their own terms. and now this process is gaining momentum .... often it is better not to catalyze a chemical reaction, and it will die out by itself under the action of decay products.
                  1. 0
                    5 December 2022 12: 02
                    Quote: haron
                    They revived (or created ... it doesn't matter) their state. The language issue, it was a "reaction" to Germanization.

                    I agree that the Czechs revived the rather successful Czech state in 1918. They also successfully revived the Czech language, but in reality it was created anew. In the same way, Hebrew is largely recreated based on classical Jewish texts of antiquity, rather than based on Jewish-German and Jewish-Polish dialects of Yiddish. But the Jews had a living written language and led a religious life, widely using the Jewish script and having a Jewish education in Poland, and in Russia and in Europe. It is possible that the Zionists in the creation of the Jewish language and the state were largely inspired by the Czech successes in the creation of national self-consciousness. In the Czech Republic, worship was in Latin, there was no Czech education, so for 200 years the Czechs began to practically speak German. I think the difference between the language of rural Bohemia in the late 18th century and modern Czech is much greater than between Hebrew and Yiddish. The Czech revivalists even quite ingeniously falsified the history of the Czech Republic with the works of Vaclav Ganka. Moreover, after the suppression of the Prague Spring, the Polish leader Vasil Bilyak argued that it was unacceptable for the general public to publish works to expose this falsification. At the same time, approximately the Soviet encyclopedia re-published articles based on Ganka's falsifications. You say that in Ukraine they come up with new technical terms of their own. Apparently this is a consequence of the fact that the employees of the Austro-Hungarian General Staff ordered the word vazhil to be used in the Ukrainian language instead of the word lever. In Soviet times, the use of the word lever instead of vazhil served as a reason for dropping out Russian and Jewish applicants at the entrance exams to Ukrainian universities.
                    1. 0
                      5 December 2022 16: 36
                      Quote: gsev
                      The Czech revivalists even quite ingeniously falsified the history of the Czech Republic with the works of Vaclav Ganka.

                      Ganka from elementary grades is indicated as a storyteller. He is raised from the coffin to troll the neighbors))
                      Quote: gsev
                      Apparently this is a consequence of the fact that the employees of the Austro-Hungarian General Staff ordered the word vazhil to be used in the Ukrainian language instead of the word lever.

                      Those who come up with this have heard about Austria-Hungary in history lessons.
                      Rather, this is done to also "troll" a neighbor. In any case, this cannot be stopped by violence or humiliation of those who want to do it. Children are not responsible for their fathers.
                      Both Israel and the Czech Republic proved their right to self-determination through blood and war. History repeats itself.
                      1. 0
                        5 December 2022 17: 32
                        Quote: haron
                        Both Israel and the Czech Republic proved their right to self-determination through blood and war.

                        The history of Israel is too short to speak of a proven right to self-determination. About 30 years with the beginning of the Great Intifada, Israel began to retreat from the conquered positions. The Czech Republic quickly lost its independence in 1938 and gained it only as a result of Hitler's stupid decision to start a war against the USSR. Now the Czechs are gradually transferring their industry into the hands of the Germans. The Czechs become a small national province in the German-Frankish EU.
                      2. 0
                        5 December 2022 18: 24
                        Quote: gsev
                        The Czechs become a small national province in the German-Frankish EU.

                        Quite right, this is called the voluntary self-determination of the majority of the people of the country. This is not freedom. At the moment, there is not a single country in the world that can be called absolutely free. All countries are bound by mutual obligations of varying degrees of legality. Even the entire US government cannot always independently make decisions regarding any actions outside its territory.
                        What does freedom mean to any "deep people"? And why are ordinary Americans, Germans, Czechs, Russians ... freer than each other?
                      3. 0
                        5 December 2022 18: 35
                        Quote: haron
                        And why are ordinary Americans, Germans, Czechs, Russians ... freer than each other?

                        Come to Crimea, talk to the local population there. You will immediately be explained the benefits of living free from the Ukrainian yoke thanks to the wisdom of V.V. Putin, who decided, albeit too late, to return Crimea to Russia. I was considered there in 2015 as a Crimean Tatar henchman and a half-witted traitor.
                      4. 0
                        6 December 2022 09: 15
                        Quote: gsev
                        Come to Crimea, talk to the local population there ..... In 2015, they considered me there a Crimean Tatar henchman and a half-wit traitor.

                        It sounds strange))) ... especially about the Crimean Tatars in 2015.
                        Well, duck probably the population of the Crimea has become freer, since it allows you to slander a person with impunity.
                      5. 0
                        6 December 2022 20: 59
                        Quote: haron
                        if it allows you to slander a person with impunity.

                        If Putin had not organized the liberation of Crimea, then Ukrainian punishers would now kill and rape Crimeans more harshly than the ISIS fighters raged against Christians in Iraq and Syria. It’s just that the local residents are afraid that in the event of the victory of Zelensky, McFaul, Kolomoisky and Zaluzhny, Armenian, Ukrainian and Russian Crimean women will be sold into slavery, as they were sold in the era of the Crimean Tatar Khanate. The Tatar with whom I spoke had both a firearm and pneumatics. Moreover, his 6-year-old granddaughters, without the presence of adults, playing with a pneumatic gun, broke off his fly. Within 2 days, instead of a broken front sight, Dudushka installed optics on the gun for his granddaughters, although my friend had no extra money at all ..
                      6. 0
                        7 December 2022 08: 56
                        Quote: gsev
                        It’s just that the local residents are afraid that in the event of the victory of Zelensky, McFaul, Kolomoisky and Zaluzhny, Armenian, Ukrainian and Russian Crimean women will be sold into slavery, as they were sold in the era of the Crimean Tatar Khanate.

                        Well, yes. Human trafficking in Ukraine and Europe has somehow declined. All sources have dried up. They then unleashed a war so that there would be a reason to sell their women into slavery to the Europeans .... It is necessary to throw this idea to Solovyov.
                      7. 0
                        4 February 2023 19: 12
                        Quote: haron
                        Quote: gsev
                        It’s just that the local residents are afraid that in the event of the victory of Zelensky, McFaul, Kolomoisky and Zaluzhny, Armenian, Ukrainian and Russian Crimean women will be sold into slavery, as they were sold in the era of the Crimean Tatar Khanate.

                        Well, yes. Human trafficking in Ukraine and Europe has somehow declined. All sources have dried up. They then unleashed a war so that there would be a reason to sell their women into slavery to the Europeans .... It is necessary to throw this idea to Solovyov.

                        You probably seriously think that Putin started the NWO purely because he wanted to? And remember his ultimatum to the West about the non-expansion of NATO and security guarantees. And remember the Minsk agreements, the Normandy format. Now Merkel and K do not hesitate to say that these agreements were needed for a breather
            3. 0
              4 February 2023 19: 55
              Have you read Ivan Franko? His works were taught in the Soviet school.
              I will add. Anyone who, apart from Russian, taught Ukrainian (classical) at school, can easily communicate in Bulgaria, even in Catholic Croatia, and I calmly read Polish articles, although today there is nothing worthy of attention
      2. 0
        3 December 2022 23: 55
        I came across an interesting topic in toponyms: for example, the city of Turov in Belarusian will sound like Turau. And now here are questions about the German Pilau, Breslau and others. Interesting
        1. PC
          0
          4 December 2022 12: 42
          Pomerania - Pomerania. Look about the southern coast of the Baltic (Varangian) Sea, about the Lusatian Serbs. Also known as Prussia.
        2. 0
          4 December 2022 20: 31
          Quote from Losyara
          Turov in Belarusian will sound like Turau.

          sounds in and y and even about it looks like. In Farsi, they are often denoted by a single letter. 100 years ago in Russian translations there was Dr. Watson, under Brezhnev a film about Dr. Watson was made.
        3. 0
          4 February 2023 20: 07
          I think: Polovsk, Breslav, etc. And Donau is the Danube. But best of all with Vienna - Vіden.
    2. 0
      3 December 2022 16: 57
      Quote: Reptiloid1977
      And such a people here has developed free and free, not like either of them, but having absorbed all the features of neighbors from the west and east.

      Free and free? Or maybe, like the hero of "Wedding in Malinovka", either puts on a Budyonovka, then takes it off? Without realizing that a better life can only be built by ourselves, and no EU or NATO can help us in this matter.
    3. 0
      3 December 2022 22: 45
      Quote: Reptiloid1977
      And such a people here has developed free and free, not like either of them, but having absorbed all the features of neighbors from the west and east.

      It is difficult to call Ukrainians a free people. Too quickly they fall under power. In different places I was told about the horrors of Ukrainian collective farm life. Moreover, from the West of Ukraine, people fled to the East, and from the East to Russia. And these distortions continued until very recently. And the involvement of Ukrainian women in prostitution has become a parable in the language since 1992. Trade in sisters is not freedom.
    4. 0
      4 December 2022 21: 39
      Quote: Reptiloid1977
      about 1654 Polonization was going on in Ukraine, due to the collapse of Kievan Rus, after Russification due to the capture of Muscovy.

      For starters, there was never a state of Muscovy. Ukraine has never been a historical center either, a battlefield between Russians and Poles, yes, a geographical one, with a stretch, one can assume, but no more. Lord, how flawed you are, why is it that an inferiority complex does not allow you to live peacefully and happily either to yourself or to us.
  4. 0
    11 February 2023 14: 50
    400 years and nothing has changed, a slave can only be a slave owner. It's hard to live a life you don't know. When Rus' is weak and the outskirts are in discord. Brzezhinsky, apparently having read historical chronicles, decided that the egg (outskirts) could defeat the chicken (Russia) or weaken, as they say in the theatrical environment, a non-standard interpretation of the classics. Only the world has changed since that time, and if then everything revolved around Europe, now the center of power has shifted to Asia, not to mention Africa with Latin America, now in the same Africa England will not even be able to wage a war against the Boers.