US press: Biden's national security adviser recommended that the Ukrainian authorities abandon the goal of restoring control over Crimea

The American press continues to publish materials that talk about "the efforts of members of the US administration to convince the Ukrainian authorities of the need for a substantive discussion of a diplomatic settlement of the conflict."

Thus, the major American edition of The Wall Street Journal published some details of the recent visit of US national security adviser Jake Sullivan to Kyiv. Officially, it was previously indicated that the main purpose of his visit to Ukraine was allegedly to talk about the fact that the United States "will not turn off the path of providing military assistance."

And the publications of the American media say that Zelensky "was asked to form a realistic position on negotiations with the Russian authorities." These statements are made against the backdrop of statements by the head of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mark Milley. The American general said that during the winter, hostilities in Ukraine "may be paused, which will serve as a window of opportunity for a diplomatic settlement of the conflict."

According to the WSJ publication, Jake Sullivan “recommended the Ukrainian authorities to abandon the goal of regaining control over Crimea.”

The material indicates that the US administration came to the conclusion that "there are opportunities for the negotiation process between Kyiv and Moscow."

It is noteworthy that Washington came to this conclusion for some reason right now - when winter is approaching, when elections themselves have been held, the final results of which cannot be determined in any way, and when problems with energy are aggravating in Ukraine, and in Ukrainian the treasury does not have its own funds. In the United States, they make it clear that Kyiv must change its goal setting.

The Ukrainian side has not yet commented on these statements.

Comments

[tlauicol]

Traitor. Take down the posters, close the embassy

[dmi.pris1]

Come on. Crimean residents really need it ...

[Aaron Zawi]

Quote: dmi.pris

Come on. Crimean residents really need it ...

From a military point of view, it is completely unnecessary. The World Cup is a closed reservoir, the entrance and exit to which is completely controlled by NATO and which today is shot through by both Russian and NATO anti-ship missiles.

[solar]

Do not upset people who are sure that all this started in 2014 because the Americans wanted to capture Crimea. :)

[carpenter]

According to the WSJ publication, Jake Sullivan “recommended the Ukrainian authorities to abandon the goal of regaining control over Crimea.”

It's just "desa". The US will never give up Crimea.

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: carpenter

According to the WSJ publication, Jake Sullivan “recommended the Ukrainian authorities to abandon the goal of regaining control over Crimea.”

It's just "desa". The US will never give up Crimea.

Has it already been posted on the "Peacemaker"?

Rather, it’s not even “disinformation”, but “flexibility corresponding to the current moment”. However, in my opinion, no one really expected any special adherence to principles from the Americans.
They drown for negotiations, and then they themselves will order Kyiv to spit on any agreements.
That's why you can't talk to them. Only beat.

[rotmistr60]

talks about "the efforts of members of the US administration to convince the Ukrainian authorities of the need for a substantive discussion of a diplomatic settlement of the conflict"

Why did members of the administration suddenly show peacekeeping aspirations? The American press was full of reports about it. And this despite the fact that some high-ranking US military and exes are talking about using the current situation to capture Mariupol and other cities and move on. The entire American administration, headed by Biden, swears that assistance to the Armed Forces of Ukraine will continue under any conditions of the current situation. Borrell lets slip that NATO's goal is east to Russia. So we just need to continue (strengthen) strikes against the Ukrainian energy and transport infrastructure and really drive them into the 19th century, as many analysts wrote about it. And forget about "we play here, we don't play here, here I wrapped the fish."

[sdivt]

Borrell lets slip that NATO's goal is east to Russia. So we just need to continue (strengthen) strikes on the Ukrainian energy and transport infrastructure

I'm sorry, but you have a contradiction.
If the goal is to the east, to Russia, then what will even the complete defeat of Ukraine give us?
There is also Poland, the Baltic states, finally ...
What difference does it make to the Americans who to throw under Russian tanks?
Run out of Ukrainians? It doesn't matter, the Poles will go.
Actually, they are already marching, so far under the flag of mercenaries or instructors, but this is just a cover, everyone understands

[Belisarius]

An elementary game of good and evil cop. "Evil" (Ukraine) says, give everything and pay reparations, and then the good owner (USA) comes and after leaving Kherson gives hope for a truce and leaving at least Crimea. The goal is simple - to generate even more "goodwill gestures".
Of course, later the Americans will say - we did not promise anything and will demand Crimea as well.

[AAK]

Definitely, another "agreement" is being prepared, now incomprehensible negotiations between the Russian Federation and the United States are again underway in Istanbul, the agenda and composition of the participants have not been announced ...

[hagen]

The American press continues to publish materials that talk about "the efforts of members of the US administration to convince the Ukrainian authorities of the need for a substantive discussion of a diplomatic settlement of the conflict"

I think the information is directed at us to push through their interests by pushing ours. There is no need for Americans to chase a national security adviser after this trifle. It was possible to give instructions by phone, shifting the next "package" for Ukraine in time to the right. They are there, apparently, discussing some completely "dark deeds", fusing something third-rate or outright misinformation in the media. It must be understood that the "deep state" intends to fight with us "until victory", so all these alleged concessions are just tactical tricks for our defeat. Perhaps the United States has a desire to slightly "freeze" active actions in order to take the breath away at home and in the EU and strengthen "cannon fodder" for a couple of winter months. I am sure that our leaders understand this even more deeply. Like version...

[marc75]

He didn’t say that, he said that Ukraine needs to put forward acceptable goals, but they themselves have already come up with Crimea in the hope that Uncle Sam will have mercy.

[belovvladimir]

Backstage negotiations, take the gentleman's word for it, it's like a promise to Garbachev not to expand NATO, in front of their voters in the United States they will go to any deception for flight points, likes, taxpayer sympathies, and the words of the Americans mean nothing, like their signatures on treaties, as the practice of communication with the United States shows, there is no faith in them, no! they have seven Fridays a week, so everything is clear, a complete American state fraud!

[solar]

it's like a promise to Garbachev not to expand NATO

While Gorbachev was, NATO was not expanded. And when Yeltsin wanted to steer, they gave him completely different promises.

[Fred Dozer]

Jake Sullivan "recommended the Ukrainian authorities to abandon the goal of regaining control over Crimea."
This is another lie. The US is pulling the puppet's strings and doing what the puppeteer wants.

[solar]

I think that in reality the requirements will be connected with the state of affairs at the front. Maybe they will give up the Crimea, and maybe they will demand the Kuban. A couple more goodwill gestures and regroupings...

[iouris]

Sullivan has a long strategy to destroy the RF, and the goals of the WZO must be achieved in the shortest possible time. There is everything for this. Otherwise - defeat. Not only someone's reputation and "international authority" will be destroyed, but the entire Russian Federation. But if it's necessary ... then why not.

[Luenkov]

Quote from solar

Do not upset people who are sure that all this started in 2014 because the Americans wanted to capture Crimea. :)

Did it all start with gifts from the kings?