For farewell - resign. To the 40th anniversary of the death of L. I. Brezhnev

29
For farewell - resign. To the 40th anniversary of the death of L. I. Brezhnev


Remember not everything


The death, the protracted farewell (from November 10 to 15, 1982) with real, not ostentatious mourning throughout the country, and the funeral of Leonid Ilyich Brezhnev, General Secretary of the Central Committee of the CPSU, 40 years ago marked the first stage in the normalization of Soviet-Chinese relations.



For two decades before that, there was not just tension - there was a very tough confrontation with repeated military conflicts. What was at least one Damansky worth (Remembering Damansky: how not to forget the "forgotten battles"), but there were more (Why they forgot the "second Damansky"?).

The world regularly shook due to fears of a big war between the communist superpowers with nuclear arsenals, but the neighbors agreed one way or another. Huang Hua, Foreign Minister of the People's Republic of China (in 1977-1982), arrived in Moscow from Beijing to say goodbye to Brezhnev.


He honored the memory of the long-term Soviet leader, the first among the "great elders", as they did not hesitate to say and write then in the Celestial Empire, and expressed condolences to his family and the Soviet leadership. Huang Hua, having held short talks with the new General Secretary of the CPSU, Yu. V. Andropov, also marked the beginning of a substantive dialogue on Soviet-Chinese interstate normalization.

Chinese leadership since the early 80s. minimized dubious ideological demands on Moscow, accepting everything that is in the USSR as an irreparable given. Emphasis was placed on settling territorial issues with the Soviet Union and on detente on the Sino-Soviet border.

"Outwardly open" China


It must be admitted that this fit in perfectly with the strategy of external openness of the PRC, announced by Deng Xiaoping at the XII Congress of the CPC, held in the first ten days of September 1982. In this regard, the Chinese side, unexpectedly for the Soviet side, expressed their desire to pay tribute to Brezhnev and honor his memory.

Moscow, of course, agreed. Even more unexpected for the Soviet leadership were Huang Hua's official statements during his meetings with Yu. V. Andropov and A. A. Gromyko. More precisely, the Chinese minister characterized Brezhnev as "a tireless fighter for peace", "an outstanding leader of the USSR" and finally "the main Soviet initiator of the normalization of our interstate relations."


Comrade Hua also noted Brezhnev's personal merits during the Great Patriotic War, as well as Brezhnev's correction of "many Khrushchev's mistakes." At the same time, the Chinese minister, to the surprise of his Soviet colleagues, proposed leaving intractable disputes on the mutual border “for later” and focusing on solving less difficult border issues.

In Moscow, unexpectedly easily agreed with this approach. At the same time, as expected, Huang Hua was guided in Moscow by the instructions of the top leadership of the PRC. And it was unequivocally planned in advance. More precisely, on April 16, 1982, Deng Xiaoping asked N. Ceausescu, who was in Beijing, to convey to Brezhnev the main Chinese conditions for interstate normalization.

What were these special Chinese requirements? Far from soft:

- the withdrawal of troops and the evacuation of weapons from the Soviet-Chinese and Mongolian-Chinese borders;
- the withdrawal of Vietnamese troops from the "Democratic Kampuchea";
- the resignation of the pro-Vietnamese leadership of Kampuchea;
- the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Afghanistan;
- changing the border on the border rivers in favor of the PRC.


The border is not shut


Such, so to speak, ultimatum, hardly realistically feasible, Nicolae Ceausescu promptly handed over to the leadership of the USSR. Then still led by Brezhnev. It was these unprecedented conditions that Huang Hua repeated at his meeting with A. A. Gromyko back in the summer of 1982. Again, while still alive and capable, contrary to rumors and rumors, the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the CPSU.


The head of the Soviet Foreign Ministry (in this rare photo, he is with Yu. V. Andropov), in response, firmly refused to discuss any issues not directly related to the USSR and China. At the same time, Gromyko noted that the Soviet side would take into account Beijing's position on all the problems mentioned. And already after the death of Brezhnev, since mid-November 1982, Soviet-Chinese negotiations began to regularize the status of a number of sections of the mutual border.

However, there was still no talk of any serious softening of Moscow's position. It will be later, much later. In the meantime, in Beijing, shortly after Brezhnev's funeral, Huang Hua began to be accused of exceeding his authority in negotiations in Moscow. More precisely, the leadership of the PRC “backdated” came to the conclusion that it went too far with praises to Brezhnev.

Why? The answer lies on the surface - because his successors, that is, in fact, Andropov and Gromyko personally, did not accept the Chinese conditions for interstate normalization. And in general, in the Politburo, the preponderance, and unambiguous, then was on the side of the "old hawks", as they were already called by the Western press.


But in the literal sense, the Chinese chose their minister Huang Hua as the scapegoat for all omissions and even mistakes. The minister tried to prove that it would be inexpedient to present all the above-mentioned demands to Moscow at once. And it is better to do it in stages and avoid "semi-ultimatum" formulations.

But they did not listen to him in Beijing, and already on November 19, 1982, Huang Hua was fired. He was replaced by Wu Xueqian (Chief of the PRC Foreign Ministry until 1987 inclusive), a supporter of the normalization of Sino-Soviet relations on the basis of the "single" mentioned requirements.

Well, almost all of them were eventually carried out by the Soviet side - shortly before the collapse of the USSR ...
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    10 November 2022 06: 04
    Well, almost all of them were eventually carried out by the Soviet side -
    "Doves" of the Politburo, led by a general "dove".
  2. +10
    10 November 2022 06: 28
    the common people never lived in our country as well as under Brezhnev
    1. 0
      11 November 2022 15: 44
      All the benefits that were approved for the military and veterans, successfully eliminated by the current boyars, were received under him, this is not counting the appearance of the concept of maternity leave, care for childhood and motherhood.
      1. -1
        11 November 2022 23: 27
        Maternity leave was introduced under Khrushchev in 1956
  3. +9
    10 November 2022 07: 40
    That's for sure, under Brezhnev they lived well, the USSR knew and respected the whole world. We proudly said - I'm from the USSR. And today gentlemen democrats have brought our Russia to what.
    1. 0
      10 November 2022 12: 23
      We proudly said - I'm from the USSR.


      Riding abroad? Not many have been there.
      1. 0
        11 November 2022 15: 40
        You can't even imagine how much. And if we also take into account the socialist countries where groups of troops were located, officers with their families stayed there for years, cruise "steamboats" were packed, in general there was a terrible shortage of tour packages, although they were not cheap at that time, plus sailors and various builders and other specialists, millions of Soviet people have been abroad, it was not so difficult if "the conscience is clear." Of course, some people were restricted to travel abroad, carriers of state secrets, etc.
        1. 0
          12 November 2022 02: 12
          millions of Soviet people have been abroad,


          We probably lived in different countries. request
  4. Naz
    0
    10 November 2022 08: 30
    The whole world feared and respected his eyebrows!
    1. 0
      10 November 2022 12: 24
      "Brownet in the Dark" smile
      1. +2
        11 November 2022 08: 21
        "You can walk around like Marx, or you can shave everything off like Lenin, and I have seen that other thing more than once and decided to grow my eyebrows!"
  5. +4
    10 November 2022 08: 31
    The current to Brezhnev, oh how far!
    1. -1
      12 December 2022 18: 42
      This is a mistake, or rather a typical philistine delusion. Under him, "stagnation" began - the impulse from Stalin's times came to naught, and they could not come up with a new source of growth for the elite. We needed a development plan, reforms, investments in the economy, but the Kremlin decided "at least let the people live." They lived, but not for long.
      If in 2014 our government would have decided the same way, the Russian Federation would probably not have existed. This is the first.
      The USSR in the 70s had the opportunity, if not to finish off, then to hurt the United States very much (defeat in Vietnam and the fuel crisis). But for some reason they decided not to aggravate. The United States in a similar situation chose a different option. This is two.
      Afghanistan, the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, a systemic crisis in the economy - and we launch shuttles into space, and rivet rockets in tens of thousands. As a result, these missiles will also be disposed of later. It's three.
      I think so. You can list a dozen 3 points here, but who cares to listen to criticism of a politician in which "people lived well."
      1. Eug
        +1
        16 December 2022 17: 58
        I am very interested in the question of why in 1974 the USSR actually "passed by" decoupling the dollar from the gold content? After all, it was possible to arrange more than one "goat face" ...
  6. +5
    10 November 2022 08: 44
    Apparently, Ilyich was an open and decent person who could be trusted! It seems that he is one of those people with whom one could easily talk "for life" and enjoy a glass of vodka ...
    1. +1
      11 November 2022 15: 30
      It was not in vain that he received his shoulder straps, landed as part of amphibious assaults, was seriously wounded, hence the difficulties with speech later.
      1. +1
        11 November 2022 23: 29
        Marshal? There is no need to idealize it. After the colonel's epaulettes, the rest did not get what they deserved, like the hero's races
    2. 0
      12 December 2022 18: 48
      There is a suspicion that it was he who began the surrender of the USSR. Google, for example, the dates of commissioning of the main oil and gas pipelines from the USSR to Europe. You can also google the structure of USSR exports by years, and notice an increase in exports of raw materials and a drop in exports of high value-added products.
      And then, when the pipes were ready, it turned out that the USSR was not working well and it urgently needed to be either rebuilt or dissolved (with the transition of pipes and towers into the hands of "good people").
      I do not believe in such coincidences.
  7. Eug
    -2
    10 November 2022 09: 24
    "Bury me face down" - from the will of L.I. Brezhnev ... but it was during the years of his secretaryship that a whole range of various agreements with the West fell, which ultimately led to the collapse of the Union.
  8. +2
    10 November 2022 10: 26
    Interestingly, in Cambodia, the real power is still with those people who were brought to power by the Vietnamese in 1979, and their followers. Hun Sen and ceremonial former leader Heng Samrin. And the forces supported by the Chinese are now in Cambodia on the sidelines.
  9. +1
    10 November 2022 12: 14
    And why among the photographs of members and candidate members of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the CPSU are photographs of several secretaries of the Central Committee, who have never been members or candidates for membership of the Politburo (Dolgikh, Zimyanin, Rusakov) and the chairman of the Central Audit Commission of the CPSU Sizov?)
    1. 0
      10 November 2022 21: 30
      Zimyanin and Ruskaov were secretaries of the Central Committee of the CPSU, and Dolgikh was a candidate member of the Politburo
      1. 0
        10 November 2022 21: 57
        Well, yes, Long, 10 years after being elected Secretary of the Central Committee (1972), in 1982, he also became a candidate member of the Politburo. Zimyanin and Rusakov were never members of the Politburo. By the way, the photographs date back to the period when Dolgikh had not yet become a candidate member of the Politburo.
        1. +2
          10 November 2022 22: 28
          And it seems to me that this poster is a collage ... During the life of Suslov, Chernenko .. Gorbachev was the third, and then the subordination was strictly observed.
          1. 0
            11 November 2022 01: 53
            Quote: Andrey VOV
            And it seems to me that this poster is a collage ... During the life of Suslov, Chernenko .. Gorbachev was the third, and then the subordination was strictly observed.

            I thought so too.
            But just in case, I checked - no, everything is real. Gorby is indeed in third place, ahead of such heavyweights as Gromyko, Suslov and Ustinov. It turns out that they had views of him, and therefore pushed through.
  10. 0
    10 November 2022 12: 25
    Out of curiosity, I looked at the Wikipedia article about Huang Hua. It turns out that after leaving the post of Minister, he held a number of high Party and state posts, was for several years Vice Chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, and was a member of the Standing Committee of the Central Commission of CPC Advisors. And his successor as minister, Wu Xueqian, pursued a more benevolent course towards the USSR. Naturally, in accordance with the decisions of the top party and state leadership headed by Deng Xiaoping.
    By the way, years of life - January 25, 1913, Zizhou, Zhili Province, Republic of China - November 24, 2010, Beijing. Huang Hua lived 97 years.
  11. 0
    10 November 2022 12: 33
    Among the heaps of anecdotes of that time was this:
    Jew under the Chinese: “It was better under Brezhnev. Then at least they didn’t eat us.”
  12. +1
    10 November 2022 12: 53
    How I remember that day now. Accurately died on my birthday, God rest his soul.
  13. 0
    15 December 2022 20: 21
    Deng Xiaoping is a tough pragmatist. The situation in the Far East had to be resolved one way or another. Which is exactly what was done.