After all the English tricks already described - one more news: Christian was demoted for criticizing sodomy. British Christian Adrian Smith, a member of the evangelical church, saw the BBC news under the heading “Gay church“ marriages ”get go-ahead", wrote on his Facebook page: "Equality has gone too far." He mentioned that the British government plans to lift the ban on the marriage of homosexual couples in churches. Smith wrote: “I don’t understand why people who don’t have faith and do not believe in Christ want to be blessed in the church. The Bible has its own specifics and assumes that marriage takes place only between a man and a woman. If the state wants to offer registration of civil marriages for the same sex, it can do it in its institutions, but the state should not impose its rules in places of faith and conscience. ”After the disciplinary meeting of manager Smith deprived of the leadership position, transferred to a lower position, and his salary was radically reduced. The dismissal was avoided only through Smith’s long and successful service in the company. This is, of course, their British affairs, but they are directly related to us: the ANGLOSAKSON MODEL OF THE POLITICAL DEVICE PRESENTS TO GOVERNMENT IN THE WORLD ... And, of course, you need to understand that choosing “life as in the West”, we choose the future for ourselves, not West ...
Anglo-Saxon political culture gave rise to the extremely nasty climate of England and the centuries-old slavery of the indigenous population under the yoke of foreign, foreign language and alien conquerors. If Russia got rid of the Mongolian yoke with an armed hand and formed its political culture on the ruins of a horde of enslavers, then the British did not know the cleansing fire of the Kulikovo field. Dozens of English generations grew up in ethnic slavery among the Normans: there was no retribution to the Normans, and no one waited for their repentance. Hence the ethno-nihilistic concept scattered by the Anglo-Saxon political culture throughout the world, the contempt for the ethnic.
The main feature of England is that the British fled from it - fled desperately, throughout almost all of its stories. They ran anywhere, just not to stay at home. It is strange, to say the least, to entrust such a state and such a nation with such a political culture to the future of all humanity. A damaged person with complexes and a thirst for revenge should not be elected as arbiter at all. We are talking today about the transition of Anglo-Saxon political thinking to a global one, with which everyone is obliged to compare political hours ...
The fact is that England is a two-layered state, similar to a building, the walls of which lay on the foundation of the former building. The power of the Normans in England relied exclusively on brute and foreign military force. By the 1080 years, the indigenous Anglo-Saxon nobility was completely destroyed as a social stratum and replaced by foreign knighthood. At the same time, the people, as an ethnic slave, remained. His language was ousted from the sphere of government, and the language of administration and communication of the dominant social strata became the Norman dialect of French. About three hundred years, the Anglo-Norman dialect dominated the country and had a great influence on the formation of modern English. The Anglican Church - in fact, Catholicism, reassigned from the Pope to the ROYAL AS PAPE - is an example of the most shameless mockery of religion, political prostitution of religion and abuse of the soul of the people.
The national power structure of the Anglo-Saxons (the tena) disappeared and a fascist, in essence, new dominant layer of “gentlemen-immigrants” was formed with full power over the peasants of a different nationality. The English tradition of total mercenarism started from here: the English did not have their own country, therefore there was no place to take high patriotic feelings. Nobody perceived them as people at all. They were manipulated as animals — a whip and a piece of sugar. If they could not be forced to do something by force, they would be lured with a coin. This formed the basis of the English version of the coming capitalism, brutal, and at the same time unusually corrupt.
Largely because of this, English political culture is pathologically false. In other political cultures, the name and content of the processes usually coincide . For example, the Tsar gave Russia a rather limited electoral law - but only because he was going to REALLY FOLLOW this law. The Tsar in the State Duma turned out to be workers, peasants, small petty bourgeoisie, and journalists who spoiled his blood.
Anglo-Saxons did not cost anything and should not proclaim boundless democracy, while introducing total tyranny. There is no problem for them to declare the most universal and democratic elections, because there are no problems to imitate the electoral procedure and to plant in the parliament some ministers of power, allegedly "publicly elected".
Falsity helps the Anglo-Saxon tradition to pretend to be a “beacon of the people’s rule”, because if you don’t intend to fulfill promises in advance, you are free to give out any, the most beautiful and bright promises. You can proclaim the most complete freedoms and introduce the most democratic laws, if it is not a question of their REAL implementation .
Indeed, for some reason, the people always loyal to the authorities sit in the English “free” parliament or the even more “free” American congress, and the British or American jury courts never justified their counterparts, Vera Zasulich.
In the "bloody despotism", as the Anglophiles say, in Russia corporal punishment finally disappeared, as a measure of criminal punishment, already in 1904. But in Norway corporal punishment was abolished only in 1936, in England - in 1948. In England, even during the period of the “enclosure”, self-harming punishments, which were applied in accordance with the “Bloody Legislation” to beggars and vagabonds, came to fashion (in Russia only to thieves and political criminals - appreciate the difference - cripple those who consciously embarked on the criminal path - or simply unfortunate who have lost their place in life). In English navy (the base of the English armed forces) was flogged until 1906 - and then they were afraid of the Russian revolution.
Spanking in English schools was canceled only in 1987 year - hard to believe, right? But even today many of the modern English parents doubt whether this was a sensible step. In the remaining private schools, corporal punishment was abolished even later - in 1999 in England and Wales, in 2000 in Scotland. In 2003, school rods were canceled in Northern Ireland.
6 Jun 2012 Independent reported that the English parents supported corporal punishment in schools. 49% British parents would like to go back to a time when corporal punishment was allowed in schools!
From the falsity of the Anglo-Saxon law follows its extreme formalism. Only the Anglo-Saxons can be situations of legitimate amoralism and the illegal moral act. If you make laws not to live by them, but only to IMITATE some state for the RESULTS in the fight against geopolitical opponents, if you are mired in “Belgorod kissels” and “Potemkin villages” - then Of course, the law is RESPONSIBLE from living life, in itself, like some kind of robot unaware of the meaning of its program.
English society and the style of thinking are extremely cynical, since they were formed by the complete enslavement of the indigenous people by alien conqueror aristocrats . All the behavior of an Englishman is based on violence or bribery. The English way of life does not recognize other motivations. And imposes to the whole world such a flawed understanding of the motives of activity! Moreover, for some time this has been combined with unbridled lies about the standard of living in the Anglo-Saxon political tradition.
This began to overstate the standard of living of the Anglo-Saxons and the understatement of the level of all others by no means yesterday. They lied because it was beneficial for the masters of the position to lie, and the slaves had no right to vote. In "The Position of the Working Class in England" and in "Capital" Marx and Engels draw the life of the working Englishman. “When people are put in a position worthy of only an animal, they have nothing left to do but either rebel against it or actually become animals” (F. Engels, “The situation of the working class in England”, p. 147). “The immorality of young people at Sheffield,” writes Engels, “seems more than anywhere else; but it is difficult to say which city deserved the palm in this regard; what city to read in the report, it seems that it was he who deserved this palm. ” “According to the testimony of all witnesses, early promiscuous sexual intercourse and prostitution, which teenagers often engage in as early as 14 — 15 years, is extremely frequent in Sheffield” (F. Engels, ibid., P. 223 — 229).
The British reproached us with the poverty of the lower classes, and the far before us began the exploitation of female and child labor. “Service at the factory,” Engels writes, “like any other, if not more, is connected with the right of the first night of the owner, which, incidentally, is self-evident. And in this regard, the manufacturer has authority over the body of its workers. Dismissal is a sufficient threat that in 9 cases from 10, if not in 99 from 100, to defeat all the resistance of a girl who already does not value her chastity too much. If the manufacturer is sufficient for this low (and the report of the commission tells about many such manufacturers), then his factory is at the same time his harem ... (“The situation of the working class in England”).
In Russian, how many do not curse serfdom, this was not only in those times, but a hundred years later. A little over a year after the German attack on the USSR, which made it possible for the Germans to see Soviet soldiers and Soviet slaves who had been driven to Germany, a paper appeared in Berlin : “Ostarbeaters, especially women, show healthy restraint in sexual terms. For example, at the Lauta-Verk plant (Sentenberg, 9 newborns appeared and 50 is expected. All but two are children of married couples. And although 6 to 8 families sleep in the same room, there is no total licentiousness. A similar provision is reported from Kiel: “In general, a Russian woman in sexual terms does not at all correspond to the ideas of German propaganda. Sexual debauchery is completely unknown to her. In various districts, the population says that during the general medical examination of the eastern female workers, all the girls had established virginity that remained. ”
This data is confirmed by a report from Breslau: “The Wolfen film factory informs that during the medical examination at the enterprise it was established that 90% of Eastern workers aged from 17 to 29 were chaste. According to various German representatives, the impression is that the Russian man pays due attention to the Russian woman, which ultimately is also reflected in the moral aspects of life. ”
But by the year 1942, the Russians had already experienced wild capitalism, an unbridled revolution with its theories of the “glass of water”, and terrible upheavals of hungry years. However, not only below the British, but even on their level 1849, did not fall! However, it is considered from the English clue that in 1849, the standard of living of a Russian was several times (!!!) lower than the standard of living of an Englishman.
What is England? She took away from her lower classes not only freedom, as Russian serfdom, but in general all human. Marx and Engels showed in detail how the joint work of Englishmen of different ages of both sexes in a factory, night work, etc., have a fatal effect on their morality: “The joint presence of people of both sexes and of all ages in one workshop, the inevitable rapprochement between them, the accumulation people who have not received any intellectual and moral education in one close space — all this cannot have favorable consequences for the development of a female character ”(F. Engels,“ The situation of the working class in England ”, pp. 163 — XNUM X).
In one of the notes from Capital, Marx quotes the following from the report of the International Statistical Congress in Paris: “In addition to the“ destructive effect of night labor on the human body, "there is also the" fatal influence of the night sharing of both sexes in the same poorly lit workshops "" ( Capital, Vol. I, 8-ed., P. 221, Note). Also, the housing conditions of large cities, crowding, overcrowding of dwellings negatively affect the character of the proletariat. Marx quotes the following words of Dr. Simon: “... it (the overflow of dwellings) almost inevitably causes such a denial of any decency, such a dirty mixture of bodies and physical items, such nakedness of the sexes that all this is bestial and not human in nature” ( “Capital”, V. I, 8 ed., P. 526).
"Many, without undressing, sleep without a bed on the bare floor — young men and women, married and single, indiscriminately, crowded together" (Capital, Vol. I, 8 ed., P. 529). “Pointing out how often it happens that adults of both sexes, married and unmarried, are huddled in cramped bedrooms, their reports should have led to the conviction that, under the circumstances described, the sense of shame and decency is broken most grossly, and that morality is almost inevitably destroyed ”(Capital, Vol. I, 8-ed, p. 549).
In his first volume of Capital, the following words of Dr. Hunter are given: “We must be a courageous prophet to predict everything that can be expected from children, to-rye under conditions that have no equal in this country (England), now they are being trained by education to become members of dangerous classes — educated, spending until midnight with people of different ages, drunk, indecent and ill-tempered. ”
The British and Americans have always overestimated and overestimated their standard of living sometimes several times in order to throw dust in their eyes and successfully conquer other peoples. Americans, for example, to improve the performance of national consumption overestimate the level of monetization of relations, and in the "square meters of living space" make any shed or carport without any indication of the thickness of the walls. In the end, get 90 square. m. and boast to the whole world.
It is not true that the Anglo-Saxons have ideologies, that their social thought is downright pragmatic, and that, apart from money, it is not interested in anything. The slavery and slush of Albion created a very sophisticated political philosophy. The behavior of the British and Americans on the world stage looks like a reactionary spiritual burping of a notorious outcast dug in deep underground who did not cope with the stress experienced after becoming acquainted with the world.
Today, British fanaticism has ceased to hide itself, the Doctrine splashed out at once from all political sound-amplifying devices, spoke by thousands of votes in Serbia, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan.
We finally heard the truth. Whether she likes it or doesn’t like it is another question. But it consists in the fact that the Anglo-Saxon political tradition firmly stands on anti-democratic, anti-human positions. She prostitutes any electoral procedure, cynically falsifying any vote for the needs of the top. We know that she admires social Darwinism, that she likes the idea of an era of English “enclosures” (so that “sheep eat people”) and that she does not experience false shame when applying repressive measures against her ideological and political opponents around the world regardless of their own (falsely declarative) or with someone else's legality.
The knowledge of this truth is useful both for those who cultivate spiritual conformism within the country, and for those who cultivate a pragmatic approach to the West in the spirit of realpolitik. The Anglo-Saxon view is that of a cripple at healthy frolicking people from a gloomy and gloomy basement, where a cripple fiercely invents tools and poisons, with one goal in mind: to avenge the lucky ones for their crippled life. Often, such a cripple, reinforced by long technical searches in a certain narrow direction, turns out to be stronger than careless merry-goers leading light-hearted round dances.
The Norman Conquest, having predetermined the whole fate of England, formed among the Englishmen a stable complex of a nation that for centuries was inscribed in the unprecedented and uncomfortable for her state order as an ethnos of the “second class”. English with its many hissing sounds is the language of the tsyng, the language of toothless people: climatic conditions and extreme poverty led to the fact that most people went without teeth for many centuries, they fell out of poor nutrition and beriberi. From here and all these English "-shins" and "-tfhs-". Experienced English teachers are advised to work out the pronunciation, imagining that you have a mouth full of porridge. But this pronunciation was formed not from porridge, but on the contrary, from its absence in the mouth for dozens of generations.
The British had two basic qualities in front of the Norman tyrants: the sly laziness of a slave, who immediately ceased to act without a stick overseer , and a craving for escape. The English kingdom fled from its king. The British fled anywhere - at least to the scalping Indians, at least to the Australian cannibals - just to get away from the island, where they used to see consumables in the common people.
The worldwide English diaspora from New Zealand to Canada is vivid evidence of the savage torment to which the fugitives were subjected at home. Mockery of an Englishman in his homeland gave rise to that amazing, brutal cruelty with which the Englishman treated other nations in all parts of the world. The slave who escaped from the slave owner brought with him the manners and relationships learned from the former master. Becoming a master himself, he tried to copy the patterns of his cruel, inhuman society.
The inferiority complex of an edentulous slave, deeply seated in Anglo-Saxon, gives rise to its compensatory hyperactivity, arrogance, and the desire to prove its primacy everywhere. For centuries, working for “retaliation”, the nation of psychological cripples, extremely disadvantaged and flawed people, has developed techniques and methods of power struggle, elevated the notorious British to the heights of world power.
This is scary. We are in a state of unprecedented global cultural counterrevolution. Something more is subject to revision than Soviet socialism and even pink Social Democracy. The question was the Christian choice of civilization as such. It is about the revision of the cultural and political paradigm in which humanity came into space and to the atom.
To talk about the destructive nature of Bolshevism and fascism, the ruling elite of the world, composed by the Jews and the Anglo-Saxons, themselves prepare a revolution, at times more crushing than the Bolshevik coup. This revolution threatens to shake the world to its very foundation, turning it into a “great England” of the times of the Puritan Kromwiele “enclosures”.
This is not only the revenge of the “deprived” English nation, as in the era of the emergence of the British colonial empire, or the “deprived” class, as in the time of the English bourgeois revolution. This is the revenge of the “deprived” misanthropic culture of Calvinism, repressed to the side of history, compressed to the size of the “black hole” of savage cannibalism, but not extinct, not dissolved in non-existence, but hidden and now ready to draw all of humanity into it. The thoughts and feelings of Calvinists and Puritans are settled and ready for use.
Our government, voluntarily or involuntarily, is pushing Russia into this “black hole”. With one hand, she indulges in the aggression of outraged ignorance, like the actions of Pussy Riot, attacking any pockets of cultural and spiritual growth. With her other hand, she terrorizes all those who are trying to resist this aggression.
As in England, disenfranchised and terror-stricken people are partly intimidated, partly captivated. The Anglo-Saxon model is affected by human immunodeficiency syndrome.
Today we see the global political and economic crisis of the Anglo-Saxon and Judaic model of life in the world. Imposed on the world, this way of life, in essence, was sublimated in special devilish technologies. A place of people who were wounded and crippled by the over-pressure of nations to people mentally and morally full-fledged and therefore, alas, UNRESPORTIVE. The merry fellow, when he laughs, once conspire conspiracies, but the cripple, obsessed with misanthropy, thinking only of revenge, becomes a master of secret intrigues. Here, as elsewhere, everything is decided by the issue of TRAINING.
And for what revenge? Just for harmony, for the symphony of the authorities, for the usefulness and self-sufficiency. Both the British and the Jews are psychological cripples who avenge their centuries-old historical second-rate, seizing upon cunning plots of cripples to the levers of planetary power. “NOW YOU, HAPPY, YOU ARE HAPPY, YOU ARE MERRYY - LEARN ON YOUR OCCURING, WHAT WAS WE HAVE!” - this is the main motive of Anglo-Jewish culturetregerism, clearly smelling gray Satanism.
LIBERALISM — a system in which, through fierce competition and universal struggle, some people MUST devour others, of course, betrays the poverty of the philosophy of the Anglo-Saxon elite, which behind the facade of beautiful words hid and hides the poverty of scientific and philosophical thought and the perversity of moral feeling.
That is why the time when the policy in the world was shaped by a Christianized consciousness, striving for good ended. The time is over, expressed by the words of N.I. Vavilova - “grow two ears where one grew up before.” The time has come for T. Maltus (an Anglican priest!) Who demanded to take away two ears from the wimps where they used to take one. And behind the times of frantic Malthusianism (purely English murder!), The time of the subconscious is coming, if it is not at all unconscious.
The modern Anglo-Sasconian subconsciousness is shaped by the patrimonial shock of English statehood, the British provincial fear of the Norman sword he has discovered, and therefore a seemingly hostile world. Anglo-Saxon and his descendant, an American, suffers from a deeply hidden inferiority complex, which he is trying to drown out by demonstrative rudeness and bluster, famous all over the planet.
 This also started with the Normans. Already the Norman conquest was accompanied not only by mass abuses and illegal land seizures, but also by a sharp parallel growth of fake paper court proceedings, which became an instrument of royal power in manipulating land and social relations in the country.
 According to the authoritative testimony of Lord Byron, in England, the “homeland of the rule of law” actually valued human life “cheaper than stocking.” The contempt of the elite of the conquerors for the conquered foreign slaves was expressed for centuries in that thing, object, private property was worth more in their eyes than life. Therefore, in England for many centuries in a row hung up even for small and very small thefts, even for thefts by need and from hunger. In England they would hang for what in Russia, having regretted the thief, they would add alms ...
 The outstanding 19th-century story writer V.A. Sologub very clearly diagnoses liberal “freedoms”: “The Germans and the French feel sorry for our man: martyr de! - They say, but you see, the martyr is healthier, fuller and more satisfied than many others. Ay them ... the peasant is certainly a hard worker: pay for everything: for water, for the land, for the house, and for the pond, and for the air, and for everything that you can tear off. Pay neatly: hunger, fire - and you still pay, canal! You are a free man: they do not push him out of their necks, die with children, where you know ... we don’t care. ”Sollogub, a Russian landowner, describes it like this:“ My first rule is for the peasant to have everything in good condition. His horse fell - you have a horse, you pay it little by little. He has no cow - take a cow - money will not be wasted. The main thing is not to run. It’s not for long to upset the estate, which is why it will not be possible to fix it. ” The well-known Russophobe echoes Russian writers, a person whose testimony is valuable even if it is impossible to suspect him of “lacquering Russian reality” - R. Pipes. Having worked a huge number of sources, he concluded that from the middle of the 18th century until the abolition of serfdom, both the landowner and the peasant were relatively prosperous. The Pipes data "do not confirm the picture of general torment and oppression, drawn mainly from literary sources." At the same time, the atrocities of the English kings repeatedly exceeded the atrocities of Ivan the Terrible, despite the fact that, unlike the Terrible, the kings did not even have a shadow of remorse ...
 Report by the Chief of the Security Police and the SD. Governance III. Berlin 17 August 1942 g. SV II Prince-Albrechtstrasse, 8. Ex. No.41. Secret! Personally. Report immediately to 1. Messages from Empire No. 309.
 The English soldier is always permeated with the spirit of mercenarism, easily surrenders if he is surrounded. During the Crimean War, the British were very surprised that the Russian soldiers, having lost an officer, chose the “senior” and continued to resist. In the English military unit - if an officer is killed - the soldiers immediately stop the battle.