Military Review

"The United States plays the role of a world gendarme and will play this role in the future."

57
"The United States plays the role of a world gendarme and will play this role in the future."For not just decades, but, one might say, centuries, everyone understood the geopolitical significance of their presence in Afghanistan. The British struggled for this, then they transferred these powers to the Americans as, in fact, the main performers of their political will.

The American presence in this region of the world will surely continue.

The American presence in this region of the world will certainly continue. Another thing is that it will be carried out in a more economical form. It is possible to reduce the contingent, but their whole strategy is to keep small bases permanently in the territory they take under control, so that the contingent of armed forces can be transferred by air in hours / day. They have a corresponding doctrine since the beginning of the zero years. In order not to spend extra money on maintaining a large contingent, they introduce such measures.

The media is now writing that Washington and Kabul intend to sign an agreement on strategic partnership, and Afghanistan will become the main ally of the United States in the region. But is Afghanistan a force comparable to the United States? Of course not. Therefore, in fact, we are talking about the modern form of the colonization of Afghanistan with the preservation of its military presence there.

A new form of colonialism has consolidated the subordination of powers in other ways.

For many years the Americans consolidated there, and only during the presence of the Soviet military contingents there could one say that they were not fixed there, although they helped the local forces with supplies, training of militants and so on, that is, they never left the region completely. As a matter of fact, the powers of a political executive began to flow from Great Britain to the United States gradually after the Second World War.

The Second World War showed that at the present level of the armed forces an island nation, which is so close to the continent, cannot be guaranteed against defeat. Therefore, its political functions were smoothly transferred to the United States. At the same time the card of the alleged collapse of the British colonial empire was played, and in fact the British were replaced by the Americans. A new form of colonialism emerged, which allowed the subordination of powers to be consolidated, but simply by other means and methods. Nothing has changed, and the global banking elite began to strengthen the United States. This elite controls management in all these countries.

The main bankers are in London, and this is a force for which there are no borders.

The Bretton Woods agreements allowed the printing of dollars in almost any quantity necessary to solve their problems, led to the realities that we are now seeing. The United States spends more on defense than the rest of the world, including those in the NATO bloc. This provision is not secured by anything, either economically or in any other way. Created an artificial situation that allows you to do such things.

The United States plays the role of a world gendarme and will continue to play this role. Re-registration in the new entourage of all agreements and relations with their vassals takes place regularly. Why? Because the tactics of doing things are changing. But Britain was and remains the spiritual center of maritime civilization.

Please note that no matter how praised the American realities, but the richest people in the world tend to eventually get property in the UK. That is, it continues to play the role of the center of financial forces, which historically came from Venice, Genoa, then moved to the Netherlands and from there to Britain. He has not gone anywhere! The main bankers are sitting there, and this is a transnational force for which there are no borders.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.km.ru
57 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. sv-sakh
    sv-sakh 25 October 2012 06: 58
    +2
    Is there enough money?
    The USA is not the same ...
    (The Bretton Woods agreements allowed us to print dollars in almost any quantity) - I would like to ask a respected one, but what then prevents them from paying their creditors now? Let me remind you that the US foreign debt continues to grow ... The printing press broke?
    1. Trofimov174
      Trofimov174 25 October 2012 07: 36
      0
      Not enough so print more.
      1. drossel81
        drossel81 25 October 2012 12: 58
        0
        The currency in question is not the same !!! And the world has become smarter!
    2. Poppy
      Poppy 25 October 2012 10: 12
      +2
      so debt growth is a sign of printing new dollars
    3. Ross
      Ross 25 October 2012 12: 52
      0
      sv-sakh,
      Is there enough money?

      Are you laughing The Rothschilds own more than 60% of all foreign investment in China and many other interesting regions, including Russia (read the latest article on BP - the highlight of Rothschild). Rothschild - the main shareholder of the US Federal Reserve plus the British Bank, the decisive voice in the international gold trade.
    4. wax
      wax 25 October 2012 13: 51
      0
      They print them without ceasing. But so as to not suddenly collapse the dollar.
  2. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 25 October 2012 07: 05
    +16
    it is very debatable that the amers will continue to play this role further. There are no guarantees and no one has ever had internal and external crackles. Each, even the strongest empire, does not come to an end. As long as the United States prints dollars, they can oppose the world, but a smooth transition to settlements in their own currencies between countries will lead to a widespread rejection of the dollar. As if Zhenya papyrchaty did not talk about power US economy, but this is not power, it is the largest financial pyramid in the world, owing to everyone and everything.
    1. Che
      Che 25 October 2012 07: 44
      +4
      Alexander Romanov,
      Everything always changes, there is nothing eternal and amerk will be kamer. Russia's task is to continue work on multipolarity.
    2. Yarbay
      Yarbay 25 October 2012 08: 09
      +1
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      There are no guarantees and there has never been anyone from internal and external crackles

      Sanya, do you still believe in chance and surprises in world politics ???
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 25 October 2012 08: 33
        +7
        Quote: Yarbay
        Sanya, do you still believe in chance and surprises in world politics ???

        Hi Alibek, of course I believe. Politics, like stealing, you go to work, it seems like you have thought through everything to the smallest detail, and here the bang and the Kamaz flies out behind the wheel of which drunk drove to zero. belay further funeral.
        Amers in the 90s almost completely destroyed Russia economically and were already confident of complete success, but once that something went not according to their scenario, it was a surprise for them. In the late 80s, when Russia was receiving "humanitarian aid" in the form of bush nuts, even it was impossible to imagine that a little time would pass and the United States would start borrowing money from Russia hi
        1. Yarbay
          Yarbay 25 October 2012 09: 11
          -2
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Amer in the 90s almost completely economically ruined Russia and were already confident in complete success, but once that something went wrong according to their scenario, it was a surprise for them

          Sanya, I’m sure that they didn’t want to ruin Russia, understanding the possible consequences of the collapse! They sought to rebuild the economy and make Russia dependent, which in my opinion achieved !!
          1. vorobey
            vorobey 25 October 2012 09: 28
            +9
            Quote: Yarbay
            They sought to rebuild the economy and make Russia dependent, which in my opinion and achieved !!


            only controlling dependent Russia will turn out worse and worse.

            good day to all.
            1. Yarbay
              Yarbay 25 October 2012 10: 08
              +1
              Quote: vorobey
              only controlling dependent Russia will turn out worse and worse.

              Good afternoon, dear Sparrow!
              In my opinion, it’s just the opposite !!
              In your opinion, Russia's entry into the WTO complicates or facilitates the cantrol ??
              Placing the fixed capital of oligarchs and corrupt officials in the West facilitates or complicates the country?
              The gradual collapse of the Russian army complicates ??
              1. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 25 October 2012 10: 16
                +7
                Quote: Yarbay
                In your opinion, Russia's entry into the WTO complicates or facilitates the cantrol ??
                Placing the fixed capital of oligarchs and corrupt officials in the West facilitates or complicates the country?
                The gradual collapse of the Russian army complicates ??

                Alibek, in the 90s, everything was under control, now even taking into account all of the above, Russia has its own self that cannot be ignored. Yes, and considering where the United States is heading with its democracy, and they are heading into the abyss! -Russia is gaining weight in the international arena, both economically and politically. As the US did not try to oppose the south stream, but it was built. As the USA did not lobby NABUCCO, as it was not even on paper, it remained. I think it is unnecessary to talk about South Ossetia and Abkhazia . As regards capital, the accounts of officials in foreign banks are no longer the problem of Russia to a greater extent, but rather the problems of these officials themselves, and that’s where they are dear negative
                1. Yarbay
                  Yarbay 25 October 2012 10: 30
                  -2
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  Alibek, in the 90s, everything was under control, now even if taking into account all of the above, Russia has its own I, which can not be ignored

                  Undoubtedly!
                  Totally agree!
                  Unlike drunkards Yeltsin, they now have a more effective manager or managers!
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  .Yes and considering where the United States rolls with its democracy, and they roll into the abyss! -Russia is gaining weight in the international arena, both economically and politically

                  A moot point, very much, but I would like it to be so!
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  As the United States did not lobby NABUCCO, as he was not even on paper, he remained.

                  Alexander, you also come across propaganda statements and ducks !!
                  There is no project name, but there is exactly the same project that is being implemented under a different name TANAP!
                  That is, only the name and investors have changed !!
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  As regards capital, the accounts of officials in foreign banks are no longer the problem of Russia to a greater extent, but rather the problems of these officials themselves, and that’s where they are dear

                  And then I think you're wrong, because having these problems manage Russia, and quite possibly already or earlier, have discussed or are discussing the security of their assets for certain services !!!
                  with fraternal greetings !!))
                  1. Alexander Romanov
                    Alexander Romanov 25 October 2012 11: 06
                    +3
                    Quote: Yarbay
                    And here I think you are mistaken, since those who have these problems are in control of Russia and it is likely that they have already or even discussed the security of their assets for certain services !!!

                    This would be possible only if billions abroad were stored by Putin and his relatives. If there were any, then information about this money would have surfaced even before Putin’s election. USA banker mystery is not a problem, they would have known and shown to the whole world .
                    1. Yarbay
                      Yarbay 25 October 2012 11: 24
                      +1
                      Quote: Alexander Romanov
                      That would be possible

                      What for ???
                      If they do, then what is needed !!
                      Why disclose ??
                      It would be possible if these people went real against the USA !!
                      And those who have billions there will not go for it!
                      But maybe you're right!
                      1. wolk71
                        wolk71 25 October 2012 18: 32
                        +1
                        And who said that GDP has billions beyond the hill? Present at least one fact of the existence of money. And you want to say that Moscow is following Washington? Americans asked to invest trillions of rubles in the army?
                      2. Yarbay
                        Yarbay 26 October 2012 10: 36
                        +1
                        Quote: wolk71

                        And who said that GDP has billions beyond the hill? Present at least one fact of the existence of money.

                        The question is not only in Putin, but in his environment, not necessarily for him personally to have assets abroad !! All sorts of Abromovich and similar GDP covered by him give me reason to think so! Lobbing the interests of Berlusconi, not only in Russia but also in the world, and much more that can be gleaned from the open press!
                        Quote: wolk71
                        And you want to say that Moscow is following Washington?
                        Yes, in my opinion, I said so, they do almost everything that is beneficial to Washington!
                        Quote: wolk71
                        Americans asked to invest trillions of rubles in the army?
                        How many of them are stolen by the Serdyukovs ?? And how many were stolen ??? what have they done so far ??
                      3. wolk71
                        wolk71 27 October 2012 09: 33
                        0
                        Well, the Americans have nothing to do with stealing the Serdyukovs, and the UK took up the Serdyukov department. And what does Moscow do that is beneficial to Washington?
              2. vorobey
                vorobey 25 October 2012 10: 33
                +4
                Alibek, perhaps so far so. but in the meantime, bureaucrats are now merging their accounts and real estate abroad, and deputies are resigning their powers in order of priority. Yes, and the fifth column on the throat is approached a little. I will not say that with pleasure, but for analysis I look at the news on ren TV. Previously, it was carried on the air that after watching the news, I wanted to swim in my heart - that the opposition is doing nothing. but now they even filter the words on the air, and they almost broadcast obscenities.

                If the bolt is sharply twisted, then the thread can be torn off, or the head can be torn off, and gradually the very thing is torn off. Part of it will come to its senses, part of it will squeeze, well, and there it’s not a pity to tear off your head.
                1. Yarbay
                  Yarbay 25 October 2012 10: 40
                  +3
                  Quote: vorobey

                  Alibek, perhaps so far so. but in the meantime, bureaucrats are now merging their accounts and real estate abroad, and deputies are resigning their powers in order of priority. Yes, and the fifth column on the throat is approached a little. I will not say that with pleasure, but for analysis I look at the news on ren TV. Previously, it was carried on the air that after watching the news, I wanted to swim in my heart - that the opposition is doing nothing. but now they even filter the words on the air, and they almost broadcast obscenities.

                  You and Romanov are smart people and live in Russia, and if you feel better for the better, I’m only sincerely happy for you !!
                  This is your country, your homeland, and you should raise it !!
                  1. vorobey
                    vorobey 25 October 2012 10: 44
                    +4
                    Thank you Alibek, I have not read it yet, but what can you say about the news about the buyback of TNK by Bipi Rosneft.
                    1. Yarbay
                      Yarbay 25 October 2012 10: 59
                      +2
                      Quote: vorobey
                      I have not read yet, but the news about the buyback of TNCs by Bipi Rosneft, what can you say

                      an interesting move, but in principle, I remember this TNC only scandals over assets!
                      I was interested in another question, it seems the global competitors of BP went into a real attack, they are put in place!
                      Apparently, somewhere the British affected the interests of very strong people and lost a sense of proportion !!
                      Not for nothing, and in our country the president smeared them in his speech and threatened with a finger!
                      Oh no wonder !!
                  2. dmb
                    dmb 25 October 2012 11: 21
                    0
                    Alibek, good afternoon. Alas. everything said by you and unconditionally (judging by the previous comments) by the people who are ill for Russia are just good wishes and an attempt to present particulars as something global. Unfortunately, there is no global one. and under the current government will not. The fact that one of the hundreds of thousands who stole a state official will resign with the stolen situation will not change at all. Only very naive people can believe that these officials, as well as the oligarchs who acquired property with their help, realizing their unrighteousness, will turn everything back without any coercion. But coercion does not smell and will not smell. I think that both Romanov and Sparrow understand this, because they did not answer any of the questions you posed.
                    1. Yarbay
                      Yarbay 25 October 2012 11: 44
                      +2
                      Quote: dmb
                      good afternoon

                      Good afternoon, dear fellow countryman !!))
                      Quote: dmb
                      Unfortunately, there is no global one. and under the current government will not

                      I think so too!
                      Quote: dmb
                      oligarchs

                      the question is that they are reluctant to eradicate, but they want to not his to change to своих!
                      Quote: dmb
                      But coercion does not smell and will not smell.

                      I agree!!
                  3. Lesorub
                    Lesorub 25 October 2012 21: 16
                    0
                    we feel that soon "ordnung must sein!" will be compared with Putin's beloved Germany, but we will all be the same ostarbaiteraE
          2. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 25 October 2012 09: 30
            +3
            Quote: Yarbay
            They sought to rebuild the economy and make Russia dependent, which in my opinion and achieved !!

            No, Alibek, if that were so, then amers would have pushed all their projects in Syria for a long time and there would have been no veto. Yes, we also sold gas and oil at a favorable price to them. Yes, and what could be the consequences, they would have destroyed nuclear weapons under Judas will always find enough money for his complete control. And as for the dependence on oil and gas, our economy has always been dependent on them hi
            1. Yarbay
              Yarbay 25 October 2012 10: 10
              0
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              No, Alibek, if that were the case, then amers long ago pushed all their projects in Syria and there would be no veto

              Sanya, Syria is just particular !!
              You will see when the question raises, everything will go as it should for amers !!
              The issue of the veto is not very interesting for them now, because there is Iran which, despite the veto, will until the last support the regime in Syria!
              1. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 25 October 2012 10: 22
                +3
                Quote: Yarbay
                Syria is just particular !!
                You will see when the question raises, everything will go as it should for amers !!

                Alibek, give an example, but not the Libyan question - everything has already been said about him, and Lavrov said more than one such document at the UN will no longer pass through.
                Quote: Yarbay
                The veto issue is not very interesting for them now,

                You think, if so, why are they trying to push through the UN their proposals on Syria, so that they would not look quite beautiful in the eyes of the world community, our VETO and China will spoil their image, the two countries that put them on the device. By the way, in Syria, our ships stood on alert wink
                1. Yarbay
                  Yarbay 25 October 2012 10: 45
                  +1
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  Alibek, give an example, but not the Libyan question - everything has already been said about him, and Lavrov said more than one similar document at the UN will no longer

                  Sanya, yes, all past conflicts involving the United States, since there is no USSR !!
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  You think, well, if so, why are they trying to push through the UN their proposals on Syria, so that they would not look quite beautiful in the eyes of the world community, our VETO and China will spoil their image, the two countries that put them on the device

                  I agree that it looks spectacular, but let's look differently, let's say China and Russia agreed, what will change ??
                  As long as there is Iran and as long as Iran persists, any intervention in Syria can lead to world war and, in general, to unpredictable consequences!
                  IMHO, I believe that if Russia’s consent was really needed, the amers would have achieved it, would have bargained about missile defense issues or something !!
                  1. Alexander Romanov
                    Alexander Romanov 25 October 2012 11: 03
                    +1
                    Quote: Yarbay

                    Sanya, yes, all past conflicts involving the United States, since there is no USSR !!

                    Alibek, Yugoslavia and Iraq were bombed bypassing the UN, Russia did not support it.
                    Quote: Yarbay
                    IMHO, I believe that if Russia’s consent was really needed, the amers would have achieved it, would have bargained about missile defense

                    In this case, there is no definite answer. More than 100 Russian citizens live in Syria and their death will lead to a good fight. There is nothing to say about missile defense, and both Vorobey and I have already posted two identical quotes on the ships in Syria. If not a long-standing conversation between Erdogan and It’s true that Putin doesn’t surrender Syria to Syria, and NATO’s invasion will lead to 000 world hi
                    1. Yarbay
                      Yarbay 25 October 2012 11: 28
                      +2
                      Quote: Alexander Romanov
                      Alibek, Yugoslavia and Iraq were bombed bypassing the UN, Russia did not support it.

                      This particular, we talked about it!
                      Russia pretended not to support, but did nothing to prevent this from happening!
                      Quote: Alexander Romanov
                      Russia will not surrender Syria,

                      in this case, my opinion, and no one is in a hurry, there is a lot of Wahhabi shit there, but it would be beneficial for amers to let chaos and urinate each other !! It will become unbearable to beg, come and help !!
                      In my opinion, Russia is pretending to resist the Amer dictatorship, but this is just an opinion!
                2. vorobey
                  vorobey 25 October 2012 10: 49
                  +4
                  What a news. I don’t know how much truth I’ll check. Dated today.

                  On the combat duty in the Syrian port embarked the ships of the Russian Navy, on board of which are the division of the marines. As reported with reference to the Israeli publication DEBKAfile Agency news reports, this information spread a source in Damascus, close to the president of Syria.

                  The publication notes that the task of the Russian military is the so-called "gunboat diplomacy" - to prevent the slightest possibility of armed intervention in Syria. Earlier, the Russian Ministry of Defense reported that a squad of warships was sent to the Mediterranean Sea. According to the press service of the department, "the grouping of ships of the Northern and Baltic Fleets will fulfill combat training missions in the Mediterranean Sea in cooperation with a detachment of warships of the Black Sea Fleet."

                  The grouping sent to the Mediterranean Sea, as reported, includes large landing ships (BDKs) Nikolai Filchenkov, Caesar Kunikov, Alexander Otrakovsky, George the Victorious and Kondopoga. The composite squadron also includes the Smetlivy and Yaroslav the Wise patrol ships, the Admiral Chabanenko BPC, the Nikolay Chiker, Sergey Osipov support vessels, the Lena tanker, and the rescue tugs Shakhtar tug and SB- 5.

                  “This is a landmark event,” said Natalia Makeeva, an expert at the Eurasia portal. - I couldn’t believe it anymore, but the Russian leadership made the right choice - instead of its usual half-hearted position, it decided to openly stand up for Syria. This is a challenge to the “world arbiter” and this is a question not only of mutual assistance. Because, after overthrowing Assad, the aggressor will not stop, as he did not stop after the death of Gaddafi. The next one will be Iran, and what will happen next, President Vladimir Putin, most likely, also understands very well. ”
              2. Lesorub
                Lesorub 25 October 2012 21: 46
                +1
                Alibek, the question has long stood squarely .... Besides that NATO must play by the rules of the UN, otherwise (with precedent Western law) international law will be trampled upon by the pillars of the UN! Russia has enlisted the support of China, which is not only the largest creditor of the United States, but also the American (etc.) industrial zone .... and China, despite the embargo, buys oil from Iran .... and Russia does not need the Qatari "Nabuco" through Syria to Europe ... And finally, how long can you tolerate the devaluation of your national reserves, which are in all countries in the United States and which they methodically impudently devalue them with benefit ONLY for themselves ...
                1. Yarbay
                  Yarbay 26 October 2012 10: 38
                  0
                  Quote: Lesorub
                  otherwise (under case-law of Western law) international law will be violated by the pillars of the UN!

                  It has long been violated !!!!
                  Quote: Lesorub
                  And finally, how much can you endure the depreciation of your national reserves

                  This question is not respected to me!
                  1. Lesorub
                    Lesorub 27 October 2012 20: 01
                    0
                    Of course - violated more than once, but every time THIS - outraged)))
          3. Botanologist
            Botanologist 25 October 2012 20: 48
            +1
            Sanya, I’m sure that they didn’t want to ruin Russia, understanding the possible consequences of the collapse!
            It is naive to think so. What consequences of the collapse of Russia scared them? Nuclear weapon? Yes, under Yeltsin, two airmobile divisions would be enough to capture all the missiles, dismantle the warheads and take them out of the country. And then - at least we’ll eat a friend’s drugg, they don’t care.
            So Russia stood up against, and not thanks to, the ideas of the United States.
        2. The centurion
          The centurion 25 October 2012 15: 00
          +1
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          In the late 80s, when "humanitarian aid" was going to Russia in the form of bush's nibs, it was not even possible to imagine that a little time would pass and the United States would begin to borrow money from Russia

          From the great to the ridiculous, one step is known. And there are good examples from our history. The Russia defeated by Batu quickly recovered from the invasion and made good use of the synergy of its stay in a large federal state. Prince of Moscow Ivan I turned the principality into a financial center, first of the Golden Horde, and then of European scale. A rare sovereign or nobleman of that time did not borrow money from him. That's why they called him Kalita. So you need to work with your head, and not bark at all in a row.
    3. cherkas.oe
      cherkas.oe 25 October 2012 23: 26
      +1
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      , but this is not power — it is the largest financial pyramid in the world, owing to everyone and everything.

      That's right, the biggest one, and if someone tries to bring it down without their knowledge, it will either be "democratized" or its smaller pyramid will be destroyed.
  3. Sasha 19871987
    Sasha 19871987 25 October 2012 07: 10
    +2
    they still play the role of a global debtor, but they often forget about this role .... parasites ....
    1. bask
      bask 25 October 2012 07: 28
      0
      I agree, Sasha, helminths ,,,. But as long as the United States has a printing press, it will print green wrappers ,,, (((not provided with gold)))) and Russia will be for its energy resources, timber, metal, weapons. keep ,, amerovskaya toilet paper ,, and store it in ameravian banks, like currency. The cameras in the world will bet what they want. And it's hard for us to oppose something !!!
  4. Bigriver
    Bigriver 25 October 2012 07: 44
    +3
    Weakly.
    Fixing position for yesterday.
    And how is the US desire to continue to play its role in the future, with the shift of the center of economic activity towards the Asia-Pacific region?
    How is the dollar policy consistent with the desire of the growing economies of China, Russia, India, Brazil, and Japan, Turkey, South Africa, to switch in mutual settlements to national currencies?
    Well, they banged Saddam for striving for the golden dinar. And Gaddafi on the desire for the transition in the calculations on the euro.
    Not enough for all the bombs. And other bombs and themselves there.
    1. Yarbay
      Yarbay 25 October 2012 08: 12
      0
      Quote: BigRiver
      How is the dollar policy consistent with the desire of the growing economies of China, Russia, India, Brazil, and Japan, Turkey, South Africa, to switch in mutual settlements to national currencies?

      This is all talk ... and if, that for this the amers will be ready in advance!
      Quote: BigRiver
      Not enough for all the bombs

      They are not needed at all ..
      1. Bigriver
        Bigriver 25 October 2012 08: 18
        0
        This is all talk ... and if, that for this the amers will be ready in advance!

        Duc, it all begins with conversations hi
        The dollar, the world currency, also began with this.
        And what about "will be ready in advance" - this is the most interesting thing. I think that they have already stopped scratching the turnip, and there is some kind of plan. Which one then?
        1. Lesorub
          Lesorub 25 October 2012 22: 00
          +1
          the lion's share of the state’s foreign exchange reserves is in dollars in US Treasury bonds, everyone understands and does not want to allow not only the default of the US financial system, but also a sharp collapse of the dollar ... A smooth transition to the multicurrency zone will mitigate the dollar collapse.
  5. sasha.28blaga
    sasha.28blaga 25 October 2012 07: 49
    +1
    I consider myself to be the right patriots and of course I dream of the collapse of the American empire. But no matter how much I and the others do not want this collapse, he will not come quickly. First, American financiers themselves came up with the financial system and the rules for it, so their financiers foresee the fall of this system and the buck, and will do everything possible to make this procedure less painful for those in power (theirs). Secondly, almost all countries and tycoons keep savings in bucks. If the bucks and the financial system collapse rapidly and unexpectedly, then there will be a huge number of countries and tycoons of bankrupt, followed by the release of labor, a drop in production, and the collapse of the economy. Only in Russia, if I am not mistaken, 70% of the foreign exchange reserves consist of bucks. Therefore, the Central Bank will not let the buck fall, and a gradual depreciation is possible only with a strong developed production independent of external suppliers and technologies. Therefore, China is trapped, because has the largest stock of currency in bucks. To say that Amer will distribute debts, nonsense, is the same as with Mavrodi to demand dividends. Of course, there is a way out of this situation and it is already known, but not to all.
  6. zz2003_1974
    zz2003_1974 25 October 2012 07: 50
    +2
    I don’t want to see anything in my life like the collapse and collapse of the United States of America !!!!!
  7. Gorchakov
    Gorchakov 25 October 2012 08: 01
    +4
    I absolutely agree with the author ... That is exactly what it is ... Anyway at the moment. All the same, we hope that Russia and China will change the geopolitical alignment on the planet and will not allow this to happen anymore .... Britain and the United States must be urgently stalled, otherwise this gangster syndicate will continue its atrocities on the planet ....
  8. dimon-media
    dimon-media 25 October 2012 08: 33
    0
    In any case, whether they have a printing press or not, the tendency for the collapse of the amerovskoy currency continues and will be visible. Above, one person wrote that he longs to see the death of amerovskoy "economy". I agree with him, I would also like to contemplate this, regardless of any consequences on world exchanges. Well, let us be shocked again .. in the first rnaz chtoli? You will get out, but they are unlikely. They cannot live without a printing press. IMHO. for the already powerful Asian economies (I will not list them) are already negotiating the transition to the calculation in the nat. currency, well, or to create your own monetary unit of account. Russia as well.
    Guys, take a look here .. although you may have already seen this page. I somehow posted it here http://www.abird.ru/articles/USA_debt
    This also says a lot. Soap bubble all inflated.
  9. Goldmitro
    Goldmitro 25 October 2012 08: 49
    +1
    “The States are playing the role of the world's gendarme and will continue to play this role”
    Rather WILL TRY to play this role! They really want to play this role in the future, they are trying with all their might to "catch" this role, bringing their military budget to gigantic proportions. But the world, as much as they would like, is changing and the center of economic power and influence is inexorably shifting towards the APR. So the world community with new centers of power is unlikely to allow the United States to play this role in the future, and signs of this can be observed today. So the world hegemony of NAGLO-SRAKSOV ends!
  10. Kaa
    Kaa 25 October 2012 09: 00
    +1
    That is, it continues to play the role of the center of financial forces, which historically came from Venice, Genoa, then moved to the Netherlands and from there to Britain. He’s not gone anywhere!
    The author almost finished up (didn’t want to?) And where did he come from to Venice, it’s extremely interesting, and where will he go anyway?
  11. Samovar
    Samovar 25 October 2012 09: 13
    +1
    In order not to spend extra money on maintaining a large contingent, they introduce such measures.

    Well of course. The more they transfer there, the more they will then be taken away (but already under star-striped bedspreads). They will be the gendarme, at least until the next crisis - they will not be able to permanently increase the state debt. By the way, I propose to make the day of the collapse of the United States a nationwide Victory Day. bully
  12. survivor
    survivor 25 October 2012 09: 46
    +6
    my opinion, if anyone is interested, is this. 80% of what we read and analyze is the information of "yesterday" how it really is, knows the one who is higher, but no one will ever share this information with the people. a lot of rumors and outright disinformation are thrown into the press and TV. making an analysis based on unverified and, or knowingly incorrect data, we come to erroneous conclusions.
    judging by the statements and actions of the Russian government, as well as by the statements and actions of the governments of other countries, America has very little time left to be a "gendarme". That is why such harsh statements began to leak into the press. The United States, as a guarantor of stability in the world (I really don’t understand when the United States was such a guarantor?) Has ceased to justify itself. the crisis has tightened the stranglehold around the neck of this "God not up to the chosen" country. those countries that used to walk quietly and peacefully in the wake now begin not only to scatter, but, if possible, also kick the dying one.
    I repeat, we are only allowed to see the tip of the iceberg!
  13. predator.2
    predator.2 25 October 2012 10: 02
    0
    Yes, let them play the gendarme, if only the navel is not unleashed, 16 trillion. they hang over the soul like a Domocles sword, or rather, like a bubble, and if burst, then the gendarme of the khan!
    1. alexng
      alexng 25 October 2012 10: 16
      0
      Of course it will burst. Where will he go and bzdyk will be painful and loud.
  14. djon3volta
    djon3volta 25 October 2012 10: 32
    -2
    December 21, 2012 expires 99-year lease of the Fed monetary machine, given to her in 1913 by the US Congress.
    I wonder if it’s a duck or really, and what will happen next?
  15. ATATA
    ATATA 25 October 2012 10: 42
    0
    But not the USA is the enemy of Russia, although a very convincing picture is created that this is so.
    1. vorobey
      vorobey 25 October 2012 10: 45
      +3
      Quote: ATATA
      But not the USA is the enemy of Russia


      United Kingdom.
      1. ATATA
        ATATA 25 October 2012 10: 50
        0
        Nope))) this is the same body that is controlled by a brain parasite. )))
        1. vorobey
          vorobey 25 October 2012 11: 04
          +3
          Quote: ATATA
          controlled by a brain parasite

          But this brain parasite is there.
          1. ATATA
            ATATA 25 October 2012 11: 16
            +1
            Yes, he is already wherever needed. And we have left the inheritance (read PERMITTED) to search for enemies in the face of the USA, in China, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, Poland, Great Britain, and anyone, but not where it is. That we could not unite, that no matter when we did not understand where to look.
            Our main enemy is the world financial elite, they are Zionists. Yes, they do not consider us enemies. Do people consider enemies of cows, or pigs, no, we are just livestock for them. That's all.
  16. Volozhanin
    Volozhanin 25 October 2012 10: 45
    -1
    Is Britain still steadfast? Let alone, especially Africa can be saved from the final slide into chaos only by neocolonialism and harder, if only we have not passed the point of no return. However, with modern Europe it’s utopia. And Afghanistan ... well, everyone understands that those who live there are already incapable of building, but everyone stubbornly turns a blind eye to this. In general, long live the White Renaissance. Otherwise, everyone will be bad.
  17. Magadan
    Magadan 25 October 2012 11: 14
    +1
    A big question for the American army: why are they fighting worse than the Soviet Army? The territory is not controlled at all! Who is stopping them? All of NATO interfered with ours, helping the Mujahideen, but who is stopping them?
    Moreover, their drones and high-precision bombs and a bunch of all sorts of other gadgets unheard of in Soviet times. They really spend on the army to hell, but that's just the army does not impress at all
    1. ATATA
      ATATA 25 October 2012 11: 21
      +2
      Worse or better, it is a matter of achieving political goals by military means. They reached their goal in control of Afghanistan. Losses among fighters are several times less than those of the Union. Why are they worse? Because they cherish their people?
      1. Samovar
        Samovar 25 October 2012 11: 43
        0
        Quote: ATATA
        Losses among fighters are several times less than those of the Union.

        Have you ever heard that amers like to greatly understate their losses?
        1. ATATA
          ATATA 25 October 2012 11: 45
          +2
          And didn’t it occur to you that everyone loves this? )
          1. Samovar
            Samovar 25 October 2012 13: 49
            0
            But here amers in this recognized master.
            1. ATATA
              ATATA 25 October 2012 15: 34
              0
              Well, if you like to think so, then yes. The main thing is that we would not become masters to see only what we like and what we don’t like, then not notice.
    2. wolverine7778
      wolverine7778 25 October 2012 23: 23
      +2
      A big question for the American army: why are they fighting worse than the Soviet Army?
      The US Armed Forces, as before the USSR’s SA, are still imprisoned for battles with the country's regular troops, but not with the partisans, if it were the Army of Afghanistan, it would not have existed for a long time, as in other things now. But one thing is known that for of this there are counter-insurgent forces of special operations, however, the conditions are not very suitable, these mountains, high-rises are an advantage anyway, for those who will clatter from above, who climb a mountain from below. In the future, the U.S. Army will certainly face its forehead with the Iranian army, it is difficult to predict what terraces the United States will have, but given the various new military technologies, their innovations, new strategy and battle tactics, how the Iranian Army will fight is a good question. Therefore, the US Army will not be rebuilt for mandatory success in Afghanistan, it’s easier to go out, lick its wounds, and is preparing for war with a country with regular forces. request
  18. dirty trick
    dirty trick 25 October 2012 11: 58
    +2
    this fully applies to nuggle-saxes:
  19. Arsen
    Arsen 25 October 2012 13: 56
    0
    In fact, having become the ruler of the world, the United States has stepped up adventurous and warlike policies, the United States is trying to use its huge media resources to deter, deceive and confuse world public opinion.
  20. taseka
    taseka 25 October 2012 14: 44
    +2
    "The top bankers are sitting in London, and this is a force for which there are no boundaries." - England hated, hates and will hate Russia !!!
  21. Tsar Ivan the First
    Tsar Ivan the First 25 October 2012 20: 20
    0
    The border exists for everyone and for the Anglo-Saxons and for all dishonesty, and this border is called HOLY RUSSIA. HOWEVER and whoever loves us and fights us and doesn’t fight with us, it doesn’t matter what kind of war is going on HOT, COLD, POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, FINANCIAL, CYBERNETIC, anyway, everyone will lose, it’s TIME and this time, on the way, that is it’s near the entrance. Russia will rule the ball love
  22. Kshatriy
    Kshatriy 25 October 2012 22: 32
    0
    ........ "Britain was and remains the spiritual center of maritime civilization." ......
    And the "family", headed by the beloved queen, will manage all drug traffic on our planet ..... (Russia will not be left without "Afghan gerych" !!!!!)
  23. mazdie
    mazdie 25 October 2012 22: 54
    -1
    USA - a young upstart who will soon be bent and all the sins of the little shaven will be attributed to them. Like, we have nothing to do with it; they are all runaway convicts, although they themselves made very good money on this project.
  24. Allegedly
    Allegedly 25 October 2012 23: 41
    0
    There are two "west", so to speak. Recently read in a place worthy of listening to him. There are amers, these are Rockefellers + all the financial clans that are related to them and who are at the same time with them, this AlchemistsThey make money out of nothing. They do not melt gold; they are printing masters. There are British and others like them, so to speak the Rothschild clan and all the clans (financial families) who are at one with them, they are CHANGE. They (money changers) are currently excommunicated from free money. And all these passions-muzzle in the Western world are caused by factors that arise from this conflict. So stock up on popcorn for a long time (in a reasonable sense). But the planet will shake, few will be nobody.
  25. studentmati
    studentmati 25 October 2012 23: 48
    +1
    A drug owns the consciousness, will and body of a person. The best, cheapest and high-quality drug is produced in Afghanistan ... You are smart people, make your own conclusions! The Yankees will not leave this region unattended until they develop a more effective means.
  26. WW3
    WW3 26 October 2012 00: 00
    +2
    Of course, it spends a lot on the US defense, but .... in the meantime, by 2011, the US public debt grew to 15,33 trillion dollars and amounted to 100% of GDP, and by September 2012 reached 16,015 trillion dollars...
    The gendarme really bucks these and prints ....
  27. Allegedly
    Allegedly 26 October 2012 02: 26
    +1
    Normal people do not know all the crimes of amers. Link interesting, it indicates the number of casualties from American drones, only in one country where military operations are not conducted. This is Pakistan.

    Jan. '09 -Dec. 'eleven
    Total strikes: 259 Total Killed: 1932 Minimum Civilians Killed: 297-569 + Minimum Children Killed: 64 + Minimum Total Injured: 901


    This report states that from January 2009 to December 2011, in the territory where there is no military action, almost 2 thousand people were killed due to the use of drones (of which more than 64 children)
    1. Alex 241
      Alex 241 26 October 2012 02: 30
      +1
      Otto, this has already been discussed on the branch dedicated to drones, everything was sorted out in detail there, I don’t remember somewhere in early October.
  28. Allegedly
    Allegedly 26 October 2012 02: 37
    +1
    Took note, thank you for correcting. But maybe for someone the news.
    1. Alex 241
      Alex 241 26 October 2012 02: 48
      0
      Found: WINGED DEATH OF DEMOCRACY, dated October 9, read, it seems to me interesting and interesting to hear your opinion. soldier
  29. Alex 241
    Alex 241 26 October 2012 02: 44
    +1
    You know, there was a really interesting debate there, I was looking in the news now, but never found. Thank you, repetition, mother of the doctrine.
  30. georg737577
    georg737577 26 October 2012 19: 52
    0
    "The United States plays the role of a world gendarme and will play this role in the future."
    Personally, I think it would be more correct to say "and they will STRIVE to play this role ...". The dollar is the dollar, but flexing muscles, bombing with high-tech weapons those who are unable to respond is one thing, but getting involved in a conflict with an enemy who has the means for a real, albeit non-dimensional, but sensitive response directly across the United States is another. The Rocked Bodybuilder isn't the default deadly fighter; it looks menacing, it is. But a street fight is not a podium ...