It is reported about the fall of the Su-25 attack aircraft in the Rostov region

51
It is reported about the fall of the Su-25 attack aircraft in the Rostov region

In the Rostov region, the second plane crashed, tentatively it is a Su-25 attack aircraft, and the crash occurred on Sunday, October 9th. This is reported by the Baza Telegram channel.

According to currently available information, on October 9, in the Millerovsky district of the Rostov region, not far from the Rogalik farm, a Su-25 attack aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces fell, the pilot died. The likely cause of the fall is a technical malfunction. The power structures of the region confirm the crash of the plane, as well as the death of the pilot. As stated, the ejection system did not work.



At the same time, there is still no official confirmation from the military, the press service of the Southern Military District does not answer calls. There is no information in the government of the region, this is reported by the publication 161.RU. At the reception of the head of the administration of the Millerovsky district, they said that they had no information about the crash of the Su-25, but "there are some conversations among the population." So far, all publications refer to the message of the Baza Telegram channel.

If this information is confirmed, then this will be the second plane crash in the Rostov region in one day. Earlier, a Su-24 front-line bomber fell in the Morozovsky district of the region, the pilots survived. In the Southern Military District, the incident was confirmed, saying that the plane crashed during landing after a training flight. The crew ejected, his life is not in danger.

The bomber itself, having fallen to the ground, caught fire, but was promptly extinguished. No one was hurt on the ground, as the place was deserted. The cause of the accident could be a technical malfunction.
51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +22
    10 October 2022 19: 43
    eternal flight, it is a pity that he did not return ....
    1. +8
      10 October 2022 20: 07
      It's too early to bury, go to Vazu, they call the SU 25 a fighter, and then immediately a note about an unknown crashed aircraft. Confusion.
      1. +6
        10 October 2022 22: 37
        I agree with "tralflot1832"... What is "Baza"? Authoritative edition? I report: Former heads of Life and Mash publications officially launched their own media project "Baza", which began working in social networks in January 2019 .... Project manager - Nikita Mogut - "Mash" and "BAZA" claims to be "laurels" correspondent investigator, but was repeatedly "caught by the hand" for "unpartisan behavior" .... In general, snotty - liberal content with a "yellowish tint" .... So we are waiting for what the RF Ministry of Defense will say .... Let our pilots, the number of takeoffs is equal to the number of soft landings, God bless them ...
        1. +2
          11 October 2022 01: 28
          What is "Baza"? Authoritative edition?

          In the context of NWO losses

          In the conditions of complete silence of the official media and the ridiculous lies of Konashenkov, the public is forced to be content with ANY sources. By checking and rechecking information and using logic, the benefit of a smartphone with a camera is now in the pocket of every eyewitness, and information flies instantly
      2. +1
        11 October 2022 01: 01
        Quote: tralflot1832
        It's too early to bury, go to Vazu, they call the SU 25 a fighter ...,
        So the Americans at one time classified him as a fighter, which is why they coded him as a Fighter - Fighter with the letter F - "Frogfoot". Similarly, the Su-24 from the beginning was also identified as a multi-role fighter, an analogue of their multi-role F-111. NATO classification code "Fencer". Yes, the same Su-34 we had at the beginning was a multi-role fighter, which was reflected in the NATO "nickname" - Fullback. By the way, you can even determine where the news comes from, if from Russian sources then the Su-25 is called an attack aircraft, and the SU-24 and 34 are front-line bombers. if from the west, then they become fighters. Well, what about
        Quote: Vitaliy161
        eternal flight, it is a pity that he did not return ....

        "Don't rush to bury him" hasn't been confirmed yet. It's most likely a throw. Like, one fell there, so why can't the second one, and there the third one will go, but already with a remark like - damaged by Ukrainian air defense, over the line of contact, in ..... the region another Russian plane crashed. And given that any flight accident can be summed up under this, then here's another victory for you. And even without a difference that the plane did not crash, and there was not even confirmation, this can be expected soon.
    2. -4
      10 October 2022 21: 31
      On the Internet there is a video of the plane burning down on the field, filmed by local residents. sad
    3. -4
      10 October 2022 21: 31
      On the Internet there is a video of the plane burning down on the field, filmed by local residents. sad
      1. 0
        10 October 2022 22: 03
        Iron people are our pilots!

        Technique does not withstand .... Huge load.
  2. +4
    10 October 2022 19: 47
    The kingdom of heaven to our pilot!
    Isn't it too much? MiG 31, Su 24m, Su 25 almost 3 accidents in 10 days, and all with a "probable cause - a technical malfunction.
    1. +1
      10 October 2022 19: 53
      Quote: kapitan92
      Isn't it a bit much?

      A lot, this is when on the landing course, at the airfield in Klin - three Su-15 crashes within 10 minutes, or two Su-24 crashes in one regimental sortie, etc.
    2. +5
      10 October 2022 19: 56
      Isn't it a bit much?

      Not much. When intense hostilities are underway, many regulations are not carried out.
      I'll tell you more, when the NWO ends, a significant part of the planes will be cut (they will only remove navigation blocks, etc.), since their resource has been exhausted.
      1. +12
        10 October 2022 20: 17
        What?
        Routine work is carried out regardless of the combat mission.
        Not a single technician will release a s-t with an expired resource.
        Stop spouting nonsense.
        1. +3
          10 October 2022 20: 26
          Routine work is carried out regardless of the combat mission.

          You're not right. The old NIAS-78 was in two parts. The second part is just for fighting. And there are a lot of points "at the discretion of the doctor," to be rude. And you can refuel fuel and oils from a wider list, including trophy ones. Of course, some work is being carried out, but their volumes are completely different and the resources are different, and a flight with failed equipment is permissible. Again, under the responsibility of the one who gave the command.
          1. +4
            10 October 2022 20: 51
            NIAS-78 is a book in a small format, it can be carried in a knee-length pocket of a suit. I haven’t seen the second part, maybe you mean NIAO-90.
            But no one will take responsibility and will not write it down in the ZHPS. Yes, they yelled, splashed with saliva, stomped their feet, but not a single one, even including the inspectors of the VA, made such a record.
            1. 0
              11 October 2022 10: 47
              NIAS-78 is a book in a small format, it can be carried in a knee-length pocket of a suit. I haven’t seen the second part, maybe you mean NIAO-90.

              NIAO-90 is actually a reissue of NIAS-78, canceling the action of the previous one.
              Your pockets are huge if you carry a book in hardcover (it is a couple of centimeters less than Lenin's volume). The first part of the chipboard, always with the copy number. The second part could
              would only be seen in the secret part, she was with a neck.
              And in the pocket they carried a soft booklet ERTE like LA, and even then not all of them. Who needs to wear "Our Father", which is learned to the fad.
          2. -1
            10 October 2022 20: 58
            How far are you from modernity.
            For the period of the database, the entire aircraft automatically increases the resource by about 2 times for all types of work. What is now done. And how much can you extend the life of an aircraft that has not been produced for 30 years?
            1. +6
              10 October 2022 21: 02
              Isn't it difficult for you to provide a document as proof, according to which the resource automatically increases?
              As far as I know, only the manufacturer can increase the airframe resource after a certain set of works.
              1. -4
                10 October 2022 22: 37
                And where did so many aircraft workers come from then, who had previously stood in the closets? It's for thinking.
    3. +5
      10 October 2022 20: 22
      So all these devices are far from new. This is where faults can come from.
      At the plant where I work, there are installations of both the 86th and 82nd years of production, and now they fail quite often. The time has come. Nothing is eternal.
      1. +5
        10 October 2022 23: 04
        it seems that now there is already, the news about the successful launch of the reactor with a full cycle on mox fuel has quietly passed, the bn-800 reactor has been brought to its nominal capacity, such news is now passing without coverage, and maybe it's for the better ...
    4. +2
      10 October 2022 20: 37
      Quote: kapitan92
      The kingdom of heaven to our pilot!

      Do not bury ahead of time if there is no confirmation.
  3. +3
    10 October 2022 19: 47
    As stated, the ejection system did not work.
    Where and to whom, now, may be aware of this?
    1. +2
      10 October 2022 19: 50
      Yes, the article contradicts itself. That something is declared there, then the official press services do not answer.
    2. -1
      10 October 2022 19: 51
      Quote: bober1982
      As stated, the ejection system did not work.
      Where and to whom, now, may be aware of this?

      Maybe I managed to say over the radio
      1. 0
        10 October 2022 19: 55
        Quote: valera75
        Maybe I managed to say over the radio

        No, in such cases there is no time for radio communications.
        1. +3
          10 October 2022 20: 02
          Quote: bober1982
          No, in such cases there is no time for radio communications.

          There were cases when, after an order to leave the plane, the pilot reported that it was impossible to do this due to the failure of the catapult. So far, it is not known how much time has passed from the moment the emergency occurred until the plane crashed.
          1. +4
            10 October 2022 20: 06
            Quote: Piramidon
            So far, it is not known how much time has passed from the moment the emergency occurred until the plane crashed.

            There they reported complete nonsense, in the news, one thing is clearly stated - some unknown persons cannot get through to the headquarters. No one will tell anyone anything, and rightly so.
          2. +5
            10 October 2022 21: 18
            Isn't it difficult for you to tell about the case of catapult failure?
            Yes, I know in the early stages of development for the MiG-21.
            There are no KM-1M failures.
    3. +2
      11 October 2022 04: 52
      The ejection seat has triple redundancy. Unless the checks were pulled.
  4. -2
    10 October 2022 19: 57
    Su-24, then Su-25 ... It's time to finish flying at low altitude.
    1. +2
      10 October 2022 20: 00
      Why are you so impressionable, at what height do you recommend flying?
      1. 0
        11 October 2022 05: 59
        Judging by the fact that a bunch of tanks with APU are attacking, there is no sense in flying at all. They don't do anything. Even rollers!
  5. +1
    10 October 2022 19: 59
    As already mentioned in the morning, it was a study desk. It all depends on many factors.
  6. -3
    10 October 2022 20: 26
    there is nothing to even comment on. with this technique and conduct our own. look at the condition of our tanks, RSZO and other military equipment. at the parade they are beautiful, yes they are new. And if you watch short video fragments provided by the Moscow Region on TV, tears well up. this is a pile of "......." from Soviet times, since the trophies are good
    1. +2
      11 October 2022 01: 13
      What beauty in combat conditions, what are you talking about?
  7. +6
    10 October 2022 20: 32
    Gathered "experts" aviation. There is no such thing in aviation as the old and new s-t.
    There is a concept as a resource. Interrepair, overhaul, etc. The resource of the s-ta (glider) differs from the resource of the dv-la.
    Accidents, yes, happen in connection with intensive combat training.
    By the way, in the evening I went out on the balcony to smoke, I was very surprised: the whole sky is in inverse traces. It is difficult to determine either YES or VTA. Civilians do not fly with this course.
    1. 0
      11 October 2022 07: 55
      Quote: agoran
      Gathered "experts" aviation. There is no such thing in aviation as the old and new s-t.

      There is a concept of service life.

      Su-24, Su-25, MiG-31, Tu-22M are older than the sex dog.
      They are 30 years old or so.

      Tu-95MS, Tu-160 are also far from new.
  8. -2
    10 October 2022 20: 38
    This is normal, it’s a pity that the pilots are trying to save the planes to the last, the Americans lose a dozen planes every year without fighting like us and the budget is considerable
  9. +3
    10 October 2022 21: 21
    The Su-25 is a good car, but it was not lucky. At the whim of the leadership of the USSR, the production of this aircraft was deployed in Georgia. Because the quality of the cars produced suffered. For example, in rainy weather, water entered the cabin through the canopy seals. In addition, the age of the machines is already over 31 years old, despite the fact that under the USSR the service life was determined at 25 years.
    1. +2
      11 October 2022 00: 59
      Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
      At the whim of the leadership of the USSR, the production of this aircraft was deployed in Georgia.

      Then that explains a lot. I remember the indescribable quality of Kalkhida or KAZ trucks
    2. 0
      11 October 2022 04: 55
      The resource was extended more than once. Then, modernization was carried out, starting from the 9th series.
    3. 0
      11 October 2022 06: 01
      The question is that the infantry of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is stuffed with stingers.
  10. -1
    10 October 2022 21: 33
    Why are planes released with a technical malfunction?
  11. +3
    10 October 2022 21: 40
    Here they write about the "old" technique. And about the mistakes of the pilots, no one.
    Well, here are 3 cases:
    - Emari airfield, year, EMNIP 82-83, split the MiG-23 twin, low withdrawal from a dive, the pilot turned on afterburner, drawdown, at maximum it was possible to pull out.
    - Lerts airfield, regiment commander, night flights over the Baltic, lost spatial orientation, the engine was taken out from 27 meters, sand.
    - Lerts airfield, a "very gifted" pilot, landed without landing gear, on the MiG-27, on the 1st and second beams, empty UB-32s. C-t for write-off, the pilot too.
  12. -2
    10 October 2022 23: 00
    what kind of plane crash is this?! yesterday su-24, now su-25. coincidence? I do not believe!
  13. -1
    10 October 2022 23: 12
    I agree with "tralflot1832"... What is "Baza"? Authoritative edition? I report: Former heads of Life and Mash publications officially launched their own media project "Baza", which began working in social networks in January 2019 .... Project manager - Nikita Mogut - "Mash" and "BAZA" claim to "laurels" correspondent investigator, but was repeatedly "caught by the hand" for "unpartisan behavior" .... In general, snotty - liberal content with a "yellowish tint" .... So we are waiting for what the RF Ministry of Defense will say .... Let our pilots, the number of takeoffs is equal to the number of soft landings, God bless them ... It is clear that aircraft / equipment, in war, "wears out" many times faster, and people "with it" are many times faster ... But! The question arises for the command of the Aerospace Forces: is the "park" and l / s ready for a "real" war, high intensity, with the participation of the NATO Air Force? So far, this is not a full-scale war, in a limited area with, practically absent, in the sky, the enemy Air Force ... In international military terminology, based on its tasks, voiced to the population of the Country, the Supreme, this is a local police operation ....
  14. 0
    10 October 2022 23: 49
    And this is not a case of subversive work of agents of the SBU?
    Something a lot of accidents for one day ....
  15. 0
    11 October 2022 01: 45
    [quote = Pulkovo1942] [quote] Isn't it too much? [/ quote]
    Not much. When intense hostilities are underway, many regulations are not carried out.
    A lot of. Look at the statistics of losses in the Iraqi conflict among the Americans and their allies.
    1. 0
      11 October 2022 10: 28
      Quote: Terrano
      A lot of. Look at the statistics of losses in the Iraqi conflict among the Americans and their allies.

      One can also recall the unsuccessful American hostage rescue operation in Iran in 1980.

      Of the eight who took off on a mission, one fell into the water immediately after takeoff from an aircraft carrier due to a possible blade failure, another got lost in a storm and turned back. Only six helicopters reached the first temporary base (an abandoned British airfield) in the desert.
      On one of the helicopters that reached the base, problems with hydraulics were discovered. During refueling, one of the helicopters crashed into a tanker aircraft, eight crew members and both vehicles died in the ensuing fire, after which it was decided to cancel the operation and leave Iranian territory.

      As a result, all helicopters were abandoned in the desert (after which they passed to the Iranian army)
      1. 0
        11 October 2022 14: 15
        sense to drag this special operation to this article? for complacency? the work of our aviation is unsatisfactory. no options. like the fleet. Alas.
        1. 0
          12 October 2022 09: 24
          Quote: Terrano
          sense to drag this special operation to this article? for complacency


          the point is that during combat operations the number of emergency situations with equipment increases. Whatever superarmy is
          1. The comment was deleted.