Blinken: OPEC+ decision to cut oil production is disappointing and short-sighted

38
Blinken: OPEC+ decision to cut oil production is disappointing and short-sighted

Secretary of State Anthony Blinken spoke about possible retaliatory actions against a number of OPEC + members due to the decision to reduce oil production.

In particular, they spoke about considering a number of options for action in relation to Saudi Arabia, which, obviously, Washington has not been able to convince to meet halfway.



According to Blinken, the main thing the United States is guided by is its national interests, which they are not going to infringe in any way. However, he apparently forgot that the OPEC + decision is also the national interests of these countries. And it is not clear why they should give up their interests for the sake of American ones.

Recall that on Wednesday, 23 oil-producing countries included in OPEC + decided to start a significant reduction in oil production from November. Blinken called the decision "disappointing and short-sighted". The dissatisfaction of the West, led by the United States, is understandable - not only does this exacerbate the energy crisis, but also plays into the hands of Russia. Now the West will have to forget about the upper limit of the price of Russian oil.

According to ABC News, due to the announced OPEC + reduction in oil production in the United States, they are already preparing for a likely increase in gasoline prices and, accordingly, for all related operations, primarily transportation. And the increase in gasoline prices effectively nullifies all the measures that the Biden administration has taken in recent months to adjust prices. Such an economic incident before the elections to the US Congress.

Against the backdrop of the decision to impose a price ceiling on Russian oil in Europe, the question is already being asked: will it not turn out that this ceiling will be too high. For example, at $120 per barrel...
38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +18
    7 October 2022 08: 54
    disappointed states satisfied! Yes
  2. +5
    7 October 2022 08: 58
    Damn Kennedy (I'll leave the machinations of the T9 mode)wassat Blinken: OPEC's decision to cut oil production is disappointing and short-sighted! Went to my office, closed and got drunk!
    1. +2
      7 October 2022 09: 51
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Damn Kennedy (I'll leave the machinations of the T9 mode)wassat Blinken: OPEC's decision to cut oil production is disappointing and short-sighted! Went to my office, closed and got drunk!

      And the war in Ukraine is becoming a very expensive pleasure for freelancers. I have the impression that they are suicidal.
      1. +4
        7 October 2022 09: 54
        Europe pays for the war for everyone and the United States and us and Ukraine. That's who is the suicide.
    2. +3
      7 October 2022 11: 07
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Blinken: OPEC's decision to cut oil production is disappointing and short-sighted! Went to my office, shut down and got drunk!It turns out that Ukraine is not an oil-producing country, as he wanted to present it.
      With Ukraine, they somehow didn’t succeed.
      But mattresses have a win-win option to save the situation, this is to turn to two virtual non-presidents of two virtual non-countries - Guaido and Tikhonovskaya, who will flood them with the same cheap oil as their show-offs.
  3. +7
    7 October 2022 08: 58
    OPEC+ decision to cut oil production is disappointing and shortsighted

    ***
    - Well, charm farsightedly ...


    ***
  4. +5
    7 October 2022 08: 59
    Blinken: OPEC+ decision to cut oil production is disappointing and short-sighted
    And for Mr. Biden, Blinkin and hedgehogs, it may also be the "straw that breaks the camel's hump," the DEMOCRATIC one. In the next elections.
    1. 0
      7 October 2022 16: 19
      Quote: svp67
      ..... will break the camel's hump, "DEMOCRATIC. In the next elections.

      hi I can't wait for that US camel to die! recourse And why don't the staffers increase their oil production? For your loved ones, and not to beg from others? Could somehow
      1. 0
        7 October 2022 16: 30
        Quote: Reptiloid
        And why don't the staffers increase their oil production? For your loved ones, and not to beg from others? Could somehow

        Well, firstly, shale oil is good for gasoline, but not very good for the production of oils, fuel oil and diesel fuel, and secondly, I don’t believe in their shale revolution, it exists only by robbing other countries, the same Syria, Iraq, Libya
        1. 0
          7 October 2022 18: 07
          Quote: svp67
          .... I don’t believe in their shale revolution, it exists only by robbing other countries, the same Syria, Iraq, Libya

          Yes, I don't believe in shale either. But the export of oil from Syria continues. When they exported more, they promoted shale oil. Regardless of green energy and ecology. And now they get less, so they are silent about this Revolution. But they do have their own deposits. Save, save, or something
          1. +2
            7 October 2022 21: 29
            Quote: Reptiloid
            But they do have their own deposits. Save, save, or something

            Yes, for now
  5. +4
    7 October 2022 09: 00
    Well, comrades of the US Regional Committee - for every trick, there is a trick, a threaded bolt.
    Not only the hegemon of the United States to play lower prices.
    Some OPEC+ countries
    have learned to play on the rise in oil prices.
    Further it will be more interesting.
  6. +2
    7 October 2022 09: 01
    Ahty ahty. How many beeches and meanings. I'm happy for them. laughing
  7. +3
    7 October 2022 09: 01
    So with their bombs - bombs, you know, amateur ones, lucky the Emir of Qatar that they didn’t let them go to a meeting somewhere, they could have been accused of something and thrown into prison in a geyrop.
  8. +2
    7 October 2022 09: 02
    What can Blinken answer - How did they blow up the pipeline and repair it. Without our gas, it will be difficult for industry and the inhabitants of Germany - this is the mildest word. It seems to me that the people of Europe still do not understand what will happen in winter. -35 trillion. It's good to push them and everything will fall apart.
  9. +2
    7 October 2022 09: 03
    Blinken: OPEC+ decision to cut oil production is disappointing and short-sighted
    м
    In other words: Bummer. Didn't live up to expectations.
    1. +2
      7 October 2022 13: 07
      Quote: parusnik
      Blinken: OPEC+ decision to cut oil production is disappointing and short-sighted
      м
      In other words: Bummer. Didn't live up to expectations.

      And about "short-sightedness" - is it a threat? Now a wave of "orange revolutions" will sweep across all 23 countries? Or will the US impose half a million sanctions against them in one hundred and eighteen packages?
      What else can the US play in the oil market? Only those that have already become familiar and recognizable.
  10. +16
    7 October 2022 09: 04
    Sorry for being off topic, but this is very important....
  11. +1
    7 October 2022 09: 08
    You look at Blinkin's lean physiognomy, at Bidon's blissfully stupid little face, and somehow it becomes fun. bully
  12. +1
    7 October 2022 09: 10
    So for information. For those who think that Sovcomflot tankers were not spared by sanctions. The Sakhalin 1 project chartered 8 Sovcomflot tankers. Companies operating river-sea tankers get rid of junk. And they carry oil to Turkey. And nowhere else. There were single flights to Bulgaria.
    1. 0
      7 October 2022 09: 27
      The Sakhalin 1 project has chartered 8 tankers from Sovcomflot. Companies operating tankers river - sea ... And they carry oil to Turkey .... There were single flights to Bulgaria.

      From Sakhalin to Turkey on the "river-sea"? What does the Unified State Examination Almighty in Geography do! fool
      1. +1
        7 October 2022 09: 33
        And in the Far East there are companies operating tankers river sea? Sovkoflot is a point of the Company, which is not clear, there are no children here. And Sovcomflot works not only on Sakhalin.
      2. -3
        7 October 2022 09: 35
        There is no USE in Ukraine))) there is most likely a crisis of fantasy
      3. +1
        7 October 2022 09: 38
        Quote: Amateur
        From Sakhalin to Turkey on the "river-sea"? What does the Unified State Examination Almighty in Geography do!

        These companies "drag" the oil industry from Novoross to Turkey, each is looking for its site.
    2. KCA
      -1
      7 October 2022 10: 55
      The river-sea tanker is, as it were, intended for the Baltic and the Black Sea, how will it get from Sakhalin to Turkey, across the oceans? Don't talk nonsense, I can see the Volga from the street, I saw all sorts of Volgobalt, Volgodon, all sorts of gas carriers and tankers, they will fall apart in a storm in half
  13. +1
    7 October 2022 09: 24
    So the eurogynecologist just needs to set a price limit for OPEC oil. fool
    1. +1
      7 October 2022 18: 12
      Quote: Amateur
      So the eurogynecologist is just ..... fool

      What would the geyropa, that harlot ---- cold wash in the dark,
      Eat cold in the dark, do not wash your clothes!
  14. +1
    7 October 2022 09: 29
    Every day is not Sunday. Recently, the can was slapped in the face, and today - a kick.
  15. 0
    7 October 2022 09: 33
    Well done OPEC countries. Keep it up ! It's time for the US to exhaust its reserves and buy expensive oil!
  16. 0
    7 October 2022 09: 39
    Blinken: OPEC+ decision to cut oil production is disappointing and short-sighted


    It does not reach the minke whales that everyone is tired of their dictate.
  17. 0
    7 October 2022 09: 51
    is disappointing and shortsighted
    Short-sighted is the policy of the United States to blackmail and intimidate those with whom they negotiate, trying to achieve benefits exclusively for themselves. Finally, they received an answer from the Saudis. And I also liked the answer of the Minister of Energy of Saudi Arabia - Crown Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman to an American journalist. A brief explanation of the reasons for the reluctance to answer his question and generally talk to him.
  18. +1
    7 October 2022 10: 51
    Well, if you consider that yesterday the EU members offended the Emir of Qatar to death (he, as much as he dumped home in chagrin), the problems are only growing.
  19. 0
    7 October 2022 12: 06
    There are a lot of donkeys in America, they will refuel with donkey urine)))
  20. 0
    7 October 2022 12: 58
    There it is, ......... Mikhalych! ....................................
  21. 0
    7 October 2022 15: 05
    The US is unhappy.
    And how the EU is dissatisfied with the price of energy
  22. 0
    7 October 2022 20: 34
    Silly Blinok, on the contrary, this decision is far-sighted and economically correct. Not all striped cat carnival. lol
  23. 0
    7 October 2022 20: 36
    Russia is one of the three countries in the world in terms of oil production, and therefore OPEC is forced to reckon with its interests. Moreover, their interests coincide.
  24. 0
    11 October 2022 19: 21
    That's just Blinken, this is the far-sighted, wise decision of the OPEC countries