Warships of the Russian Navy and the PLA Navy covered more than 7 nautical miles during joint patrols in the Pacific Ocean

Russia and China completed the second joint patrol of the Pacific Ocean, in which warships of the Russian Navy and the Chinese Navy took part. Detachment of ships of the Pacific fleet already returned to the base in Vladivostok. This is stated in the message of the Ministry of Defense.

A joint detachment of ships of the two countries, which included the frigate Marshal Shaposhnikov, the corvettes Hero of the Russian Federation Aldar Tsydenzhapov, Perfect and Loud, as well as the Pechenga medium sea tanker from the Russian Navy and the destroyer Nyan Chan , the Yang Chen patrol ship and the Dong Pinghu complex supply vessel from the PLA Navy, patrolled the Pacific Ocean for three weeks. The tasks of patrolling are maintaining peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region, protecting the objects of the maritime economic activity of the two countries and establishing interaction.

During this time, the detachment passed through the Sea of ​​Japan, the Sea of ​​Okhotsk, the Bering Sea, the Philippine Sea, and the East China Sea, visiting the Bering Sea for the first time and rounding part of the Aleutian Islands archipelago. In total, the ships of the two countries traveled more than seven thousand nautical miles.

During the campaign, Russian and Chinese sailors conducted a number of different exercises, within which they worked out joint maneuvering, organizing communications, searching for and destroying enemy submarines, organizing air defense of a group of ships, and much more.

It is noted that the second joint patrol lasted longer than the first, which took place from 17 to 23 October 2021. Then the grouping of ships passed through the Sangar Strait, overcoming a total of over 1700 nautical miles.

Comments

[kor1vet1974]

During the campaign, Russian and Chinese sailors conducted a number of different exercises, within which they worked out joint maneuvering, organizing communications, searching for and destroying enemy submarines, organizing air defense of a group of ships, and much more.

Not a bad job

[Vladimir_2U]

Joint patrolling is certainly good, but where was the fleet when the Nord Stream was undermined?
Naturally, Klimov is right when he writes that not only the leadership of the country, the naval command has no understanding of why the fleet itself is needed!

[single-n]

And how could the fleet protect a pipe 1000 km away, and even near the territorial waters of other countries? Patrols by divers 24/7 with sea dogs?? Or build a fence?

[Vladimir_2U]

Quote: Single-n

And how could the fleet protect a pipe 1000 km away, and even near the territorial waters of other countries?

You know how to use your brain, don't you? 1000 km. this is not even a distance for small ships, nearby does not mean that it is in territorial waters.

Quote: Single-n

Patrols by divers 24/7 with sea dogs?? Or build a fence?

What brains, what am I talking about. A person does not suspect about sonars and about the depths of the Baltic.

[single-n]

A task for a man with brains.
Given: a pipe string under 1000 km. The detection range of underwater sabotage vehicles is 20-50 kilometers. Question. HOW MANY ships need to be used for CONTINUOUS patrols? Do not forget that the ships need to be repaired, refueled, the crews to rest. For additional points, calculate HOW MUCH IT WILL COST. And yes, small ships that can carry serious GAS systems are "shells" under 500 tons. Boats are straight. And if we want to place a helicopter, then the "baby" is already growing up to 2 thousand tons.
Add. Question. You found a torpedo / underwater robot moving at a speed of 30-40 knots (about 60 km / h) towards the pipe. Your actions? Than IT to intercept? And if there are 5-6 of them? and a dozen decoys?
By the way explain that there with depths? Maybe waist-deep water? But how did submarines operate there in WWII? Or for you, less than 1-2 km is a paddling pool?

[Vladimir_2U]

Quote: Single-n

By the way explain that there with depths? Maybe waist-deep water? But how did submarines operate there in WWII? Or for you, less than 1-2 km is a paddling pool?

The average sea depth is 50 m, the maximum pipe depth is 200 m. This is available for diving operations. In principle, your level - "fence with dogs" is understandable., But I will continue.

Quote: Single-n

HOW MANY ships need to be used for CONTINUOUS patrols?

Clearly, a fence with dogs! The fact that the Americans were spinning for several days over the places of explosions does not reach you at all, and the fact that our ships there would not be superfluous in any way is incomprehensible to you, well, yes - you can’t jump above the fence.
18 knots 1000 km is 30 hours of time. 3 (three) ships are enough for a 10 hour interval with PASSIVE sonar, excluding helicopters.

Quote: Single-n

And yes, small ships that can carry serious GAS systems are "shells" under 500 tons. Boats are straight.

Under 500 tons, this is exactly the BOAT according to the naval classification.

Quote: Single-n

Add. Question. You found a torpedo / underwater robot moving at a speed of 30-40 knots (about 60 km / h) towards the pipe. Your actions? Than IT to intercept? And if there are 5-6 of them? and a dozen decoys?

Such a smart question - did you think for a long time? The fact that there are no civilian robots at such a speed, which means that in the presence of a warship, such actions are tantamount to an attack, didn’t they think up? Did they come up with false underwater targets at the speed of a torpedo themselves? However ... The fact that the first reaction is to destroy torpedoes, and the second to look for the carrier that launched them, did the fence prevent you from thinking?
If only they looked through the materiel before inventing nonsense. Torpedoes simply will not be guided through the pipes lying at the bottom, domestic ships are equipped with the Udav, Paket anti-torpedo protection and other RBUs.
The fact that you are zero in naval affairs is clear, but who do you need to be in order not to understand that it was enough for the presence of Russian ships in the places of amers' exercises? Here is WHO?

[single-n]

1. The most important answer was given. 10 hour interval. Cool. Official security. What is the speed of even a diesel submarine? 10-20 knots underwater? In 4 hours + 4 return + 2 to charge, it will cover from 70 to 150 km. And what will your one of the three boats see after 10 hours? whirlpool at the site of the explosion? And if the charge works in a week? Or generally by an external signal. Just don’t rub it that there are no underwater communication systems, you are our naval commander. Who will you catch there?
2. Are your three boats eternal? and atomically? Breakdowns, profikatika, replenishment of fuel with food, crew change is not provided? And then suddenly 3 turns into 5 or even 8. I hope that you have nothing to do with scheduling work. Otherwise Khan to your enterprise.
3. 500 ton boat. Xs. In the west, this is a full-fledged corvette, we have a rank 4 ship. The boat is somewhat smaller. Well, okay. However, you can’t even dream of helicopters on this.
4. "The fact that there are no civilian robots at such a speed, which means that in the presence of a warship, such actions are tantamount to an attack, didn't you think up?" So he still needs to be caught. With your then 10 hour intervals between patrols. Who is stopping him from stealing the day to the point? At any speed. At least 2 nodes, at least 20. And even found out? Well? This is a civilian robot taking pictures of fish. Will you take it out of the water with nets and inspect it? Or maybe he's a soldier. It’s just that the test program is here, and he swam away as a bastard, thanks for catching the scoundrel. And that's it. Tomorrow they will do 10 more attempts. and bet is no longer a Dutch ship, but a Danish, or Spanish one. Who exactly are you going to charge? Which one of them successfully mined the pipe?

5. Well, what you heard about imitators and torpedoes and submarines is your business. Brain pressure? .Torpedoes are not being conducted? Horror!! Cars weighing a couple of tons are sent to Mars, and to figure out a torpedo / submarine that cannot get into a piece of cast iron 1000 km long and whose coordinates are known with an accuracy of just not up to a meter is an unsolvable task. OK. Let's make the problem easier. First, divers from some hydrographic-ecological vessel will set up a beacon activated remotely. Moreover, the lighthouse will be put up in May or June. I hope that the excess of mosquito did not allow you to forget that this is the Baltic and there are HUNDREDS of civilian ships roaming about. And military dozens. But you will undoubtedly control them ALL with THREE BOATS.
Now for RBU. What is the range of these megadevices? 3km-5km. They will protect the ship. But what is our goal? Further, do you even understand how this miracle works? Yeah. Bangs with a depth charge on a torpedo !! Wonderful. The plans of the enemy are thwarted - we ruined it ourselves.!!! The same "boa constrictor" shoots such a tiny, weighing under 250 kg.
I don’t know what knowledge you have about the fleet and boats, but in terms of organizing security, they are somewhere at the level of the Mariana Trench. :)

[Vladimir_2U]

It is clear that stupidity about proximity to foreign terrorist waters and about the monstrous depths of the Baltic is not worth remembering, yeah.

Quote: Single-n

The most important answer was 10 hour interval. Cool. Official security.

The fence still compresses the brain, ever tighter. For three ships, and for six it is already 5 hours, and with a course of 24 knots it is already 3,5 hours. only the GAS mode is active.

Quote: Single-n

And then suddenly 3 turns into 5 or even 8. I hope that you have nothing to do with scheduling work. Otherwise Khan to your enterprise.

Even the fence is guarded by dogs in shifts, what is news for you? And even the dogs are aware of the enhanced duty schedule. You are not. And the fact that even 8 ships of different classes and types are on duty is not a big problem for the fleet, especially at a distance of a daily transition to the base.

Quote: Single-n

500 ton boat. Xs. In the west, this is a full-fledged corvette

Project 1241 Molniya missile boats, according to NATO classification - Tarantul-class corvettes 469 t (full)
Project 1241RE
380 t (standard)
455 t (full)
Projects 12411 and 12417
436 t (standard)
493 t (full)
Project 12418
580 t (full)
Project 12421
496 t (standard)
550 t (full)
EG

Quote: Single-n

Well, okay. However, you can’t even dream of helicopters on this.

And so, I wrote that even for small ships 1000 km is not a distance, what are you trying to forget about patrol ships, frigates and real and not 500 ton corvettes?

Quote: Single-n

And if the charge works in a week? Or generally by an external signal. Just don’t rub it that there are no underwater communication systems, you are our naval commander.

Are you really all about the fence, are you from the 19th century?. You naturally do not understand that the GAS in the active mode allows you to practically inspect the bottom. Or will you rub it that it is not so?

Quote: Single-n

And even discovered? Well? This is a civilian robot taking pictures of fish. Will you take it out of the water with nets and inspect it? Or maybe he's a soldier. It’s just that the test program is here, and he swam away as a bastard, thanks for catching the scoundrel. And that's it. Tomorrow they will do 10 more attempts. and bet is no longer a Dutch ship, but a Danish, or Spanish one. Who exactly are you going to charge?

Amazing mind, what passes/attempts are fixed in normal service this mind does not allow you to understand? It's basically an evidence base. And the fact that the act of state terrorism will not be spread on several foreign performers, in order to avoid leakage, although people like you will probably be able to. And the fact that naval UAVs, especially without a flag and homeland, are quite calmly pulled out of the water.

Quote: Single-n

Well, what you heard about imitators and torpedoes and submarines is your business.

Well, tell me about torpedo simulators. And how and against what imitators of boats work.

Quote: Single-n

and to figure out a torpedo / submarine that cannot get into a piece of cast iron 1000 km long and whose coordinates are known with an accuracy of just not up to a meter is an unsolvable task.

Well, tell us about GPS for torpedoes. Hand face!

Quote: Single-n

First, divers from some hydrographic-ecological vessel will set up a beacon activated remotely.

With the normal organization of the fleet service, this activity is fixed!

Quote: Single-n

But you will undoubtedly control them ALL with THREE BOATS.

About three boats, this is for you.

Quote: Single-n

Yeah. Bangs with a depth charge on a torpedo !! Wonderful. The plans of the enemy are thwarted - we blew it up ourselves.!!! The same "boa constrictor" shoots such a tiny, weighing under 250 kg.

Hello, I inform you via underwater communication - bypassing your brain, it still does not work, 80 kg of explosives of the bomb can certainly damage the pipe, but this only means that the torpedo has already hit it. And so the bombs are fired in advance. Well, your very clever question looked like this:
Single-n] Than IT to intercept?

Quote: Single-n

I don’t know what knowledge you have about the fleet and boats, but in terms of organizing security, they are somewhere at the level of the Mariana Trench. :)

You never remembered the GAS, it’s not for you to talk about the fleet at all. Maybe you understand something about guarding the fence with the help of dogs, but you just can’t understand that video cameras near the same fence drastically reduce the desire to penetrate it, and not even patrolling, but simply watching the amers would frustrate this attempt for sure.

And now I repeat:
but who do you need to be in order not to understand that it was enough for the presence of Russian ships in the places of amers' exercises?
And I will add that it is impossible to physically protect the pipe, only by military operations, but it is real to disrupt the mining of the North Stream in international waters at the Baltic depths. It was. Or will.

[rotmistr60]

Joint patrolling is, of course, good - defiantly and, as they say, information for thought for the United States. Interested in something else. In addition to joint exercises and patrols, will military cooperation between the two countries move to a higher level? Based on Chinese tactics, it is unlikely. But what we have today is also good.

[bath]

This is a hint that we are moving more and more towards a military alliance.

Joint command, coordinated synchronization must be carried out with great confidence, and if the route and time are running out, this is a very clear signal.

[dauria]

This is a hint that we are moving more and more towards a military alliance.

How about Germany in the 40th? Then even German pilots were trained in the USSR and German planes were bought. And I don’t remember any large ship.
As soon as China sees that NATO is breaking Russia, it will immediately occupy the Far East to the Bering Strait. He understands that in this case the Russians will become cannon fodder against him.

[bath]

1, I am Chinese and we are not even going to take the opportunity to occupy the Far East. Land is not a necessity for us, our goal is the economy and how to protect a good life.

2, a military alliance means a legal obligation of one country to another, if you allow Putin to continue to assure you that the war will not affect the lives of Russians, you protest and run from this special military operation. If you yourself are not ready to shed blood for your country, then the Chinese, North Koreans, Vietnamese will not have an alliance with you, we will only maintain friendship with you.


3, do not say Damansky every time, do not say that the Chinese have invaded the Far East, we are very annoyed that the Russians say this.

[single-n]

In 1940, no one to hell with the Germans needed to train pilots in the USSR. They already had the strongest aviation in the world and at that time they fought in half of Europe. And very successfully. What could they learn from us? How to fight on wooden planes of the mid-30s?

[tralflot1832]

Now the commanders of the ships of the Pacific Fleet need to know Chinese necessarily?

[bath]

It will be better, just like we Chinese will learn Russian.

No need to be so arrogant with neighbors or constantly complain about Russia

[Sergej1972]

I think ours will learn the basics of Chinese, and the Chinese the basics of the Russian language. In fact, of course, it is difficult for most Russians to learn Chinese, and for most Chinese, Russian is also a difficult language to learn.

[Normann]

These two languages ​​are among the most difficult to learn.

[Petr_Koldunov]

I do not know about the results of this expedition - but it is already good that we have again begun to indicate our presence in the far sea zone.