Bloomberg: It will take the United States "long years" to supply new HIMARS MLRS to Ukraine

19
Bloomberg: It will take the United States "long years" to supply new HIMARS MLRS to Ukraine

The transfer of 18 new MLRS (multiple launch rocket systems) HIMARS to Ukraine will take a long time, possibly “many years”. This was reported by Bloomberg. The publication received such information from a high-ranking official of the US Department of Defense.

Unlike previous HIMARS MLRS, new batches of installations will not be supplied from the existing quantity. They will first need to be produced at the enterprises of the US military-industrial complex, as part of the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, ensuring the workload of the American defense industry.



The United States will not be able to promptly supply other equipment that was included in the latest aid package to Ukraine. Its transfer to the Kyiv authorities will also take from 6 to 24 months. And these are only the most optimistic forecasts of the American side.

Recall that at present, the armed forces of Ukraine have already received 16 HIMARS MLRS installations from the United States. Although the American authorities have stated that these installations will be used to combat Russian troops, the Ukrainian military regularly fires at residential areas and civilian infrastructure of the Republics of Donbass and the liberated territories of the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions from the HIMARS MLRS.

The Russian authorities have repeatedly warned the United States and other Western countries about the inadmissibility of arms supplies to Ukraine. The constant transfer of weapons, military equipment, the participation of military instructors and mercenaries turns Western countries into one of the participants in the conflict in Ukraine.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    19 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +9
      29 September 2022 13: 41
      They’re lying like they’re breathing .... who do you want to lull to sleep ..... if you put the outskirts on the stop list, nothing will be left of it in a couple of weeks .... that means they’ve already dragged .....
      1. +2
        29 September 2022 13: 52
        This is information stuffing, to curtail assistance to Ukraine. Ukraine has done everything that was intended for it, now quietly, they will leave the nanny alone with Russia ... Slavic blood will be shed a lot more .. but the hegemon has already used Ukraine, for the most part .. Now Russia has to finish the bloody performance ... and harness to the restoration of Ukraine
      2. -1
        29 September 2022 14: 31
        In one department they can believe ..
    2. +5
      29 September 2022 13: 42
      It will take a long time to transfer 18 new MLRS (multiple launch rocket systems) HIMARS to Ukraine
      you have to be an idiot to believe in such fairy tales ....
      1. +7
        29 September 2022 13: 47
        Special disinformation so that they would not hunt for these supplies
    3. +7
      29 September 2022 13: 45
      The Russian authorities have repeatedly warned the United States and other Western countries about the inadmissibility of arms supplies to Ukraine.
      Something not very scared of them! They also send mercenaries immeasurably! And all four threads of the gas pipeline were blown up for greater persuasiveness! belay
    4. +1
      29 September 2022 13: 46
      Bloomberg: It will take the United States "long years" to supply new HIMARS MLRS to Ukraine
      . The question is certainly interesting...
      How it will be real ... some guesses, versions, and politicians can decide in their own way.
      Although, there are nuances through which it will be problematic for them to step over.
      However, this has already been discussed more than once.
      Time will tell what they will do right now.
    5. -1
      29 September 2022 13: 47
      How could one not make large stocks of high-precision weapons before the war.
      The US has spent more than 20 long-range precision bombs and missiles in Iraq.
      How could one hope to win against a country much stronger with several thousand missiles.
      If the production of missiles does not grow significantly, then it may end badly
    6. -2
      29 September 2022 13: 49
      In general, it was said something like this .. All this fingered high-precision is enough for a couple of months of a serious conflict ... Or for half a year - a year of a conflict of medium intensity ... If a decisive result is not achieved during this time, they begin problems .. Either the economy is transferred to a war footing with all the consequences for the participants, or - the accumulated equipment of the 60s - 70s is taken from the warehouses ... And the war - goes into a completely different quality ..
    7. -2
      29 September 2022 13: 50
      It is only Russia that loudly warns everyone about what it may not do at all in "many years."
      They are already there.
      And they are already working.
      I don't like it either. (
    8. +1
      29 September 2022 14: 01
      Let the United States supply Hymars and MLRS, they have a lot of them. But the ammunition may run out, with 155 mm shells there is already a problem, you need to increase production, this will take time and there will most likely be interruptions in supplies.
    9. 0
      29 September 2022 14: 01
      Among the verbal husks, the meaning is hidden that the HIMARS MLRS were knocked out fairly well on the territory of Ukraine.
    10. Two
      0
      29 September 2022 14: 16
      hi Well, like, like HARMs... Appeared out of nowhere...
    11. 0
      29 September 2022 14: 42
      The Russian authorities have repeatedly warned the United States and other Western countries about the inadmissibility of arms supplies to Ukraine.

      Usually when someone warns, they ask him the question: "What about?". Alas, Russia has drawn new "red lines" to such questions, since the Russian elite simply cannot answer them. We live in times of half-measures and post-COVID schizophrenia, and the future of Russia is becoming increasingly vague, as is the future of the whole world.
    12. 0
      29 September 2022 14: 45
      I've wanted to ask for a long time.
      MLRS itself is an expensive thing. Missiles for her 150 thousand dollars. thing. Quantity is limited.
      In my opinion, when conducting hostilities, they must be spent wisely. Roughly speaking, the hit target was worth it. As an example - Antonovsky bridge.
      But what is the urgent need to hit these expensive ammunition just on residential areas? Stupidly tyrannize their own compatriots? what
      1. -2
        29 September 2022 15: 23
        Roughly speaking, the hit target was worth it. As an example - Antonovsky bridge.

        They have already released at least 3 dozen on the Antonovsky bridge, and as soon as the situation changes, it will be restored in two weeks, so the cost of maintaining it inoperative is only increasing and, from the point of view of military propaganda effectiveness, is no better than terrorizing the population or the same prisoners of war.
    13. 0
      29 September 2022 15: 07
      The transfer of 18 new MLRS (multiple launch rocket systems) HIMARS to Ukraine will take a long time, possibly “many years”.

      And I very much hope that after a while it will take a very long time, perhaps for many years, to resume Ukraine's presence on the world map.
    14. -1
      29 September 2022 18: 45
      Yes, of course, this is a lie. What cannot be taken away from the United States is the ability to work quickly.
    15. 0
      30 September 2022 12: 08
      Whether the United States itself will have these "long years" in its current form, that is the question.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"