“Trucks ran out”: Forbes author found an “obstacle” to partial mobilization in Russia
After the start of partial mobilization in the Russian Federation, the Western media, having somewhat recovered from the initial knockdown, began to publish articles not only criticizing the political decision of President Vladimir Putin, but also arguing that partial mobilization would allegedly not lead to the desired consequences by Moscow.
Thus, the author of Forbes magazine, repeating the Ukrainian lie about the incredible losses of the Russian army in a special military operation, is trying to reassure his readers about mobilization in Russia. Demonstrating a poor understanding of the structure of the Russian Armed Forces, he writes that “300 recruits are ... a lot of recruits” and recalls that by the time the special operation began, the Russian Armed Forces numbered 900 people. This, apparently, to the fact that the mobilization of the weather will not do. The author, apparently, is not aware of the huge borders of Russia, the presence of several fleets.
He goes on to claim that the Russian army will receive conscripts of "terrible quality", basing his claim on no clear basis. Allegedly, there are no officers and sergeants in the army who could lead the formations from the mobilized. Apparently, he is unaware that it is officers and sergeants who are called in the first place, of which there are millions in the ranks of the reserve, of which many have real combat experience.
But then things get really interesting. The Forbes author believes that the Russian army ... has run out of trucks. Now, in his opinion, the army is tied to the railway stations. Therefore, the mobilized will be able to operate only close to railway stations, the observer writes.
He recalls the dependence of Russian logistics on railways, again, completely unaware of the realities of our country - and the length of the railway track, and its branching, and the distances that trains have to overcome. Russia is not Lithuania or Belgium, you cannot build army logistics on trucks alone.
According to the author of Forbes, it was allegedly the lack of trucks that caused the withdrawal of Russian troops from Kyiv. The Ukrainian military managed to destroy the rear columns that brought ammunition, after which the Russian troops found themselves without supplies. This, in the end, led to the decision to withdraw troops. Why the trucks did not run out in the Kherson or Zaporozhye regions, the author, of course, does not mention.
No, of course, the more trucks and equipment in general, the better, and the extra trucks of the Russian army would not hurt. But making the outcome of the mobilization campaign and the special operation as a whole dependent solely on trucks is a strange idea. True, Western authors are so eager to calm public opinion in their countries, strongly agitated by referendums and partial mobilization in the Russian Federation, that they no longer know what other reasons for the supposedly imminent defeat of the Russian army to come up with. Yes, but for some reason Russia continues to control 20% of the territory of the former Ukraine, and the vast majority of the inhabitants of these regions (as polls show) support their inclusion in the Russian state.
Information