Kadyrov remains: the Head of Chechnya decided to break the record of being the head of the region

58

The head of the Chechen Republic, Ramzan Kadyrov, made another statement by posting a post on his Telegram channel. He again raised the issue of his indefinite leave, but this time emphasized that he was not the “number one long-liver” at the head of the Russian region, as he had been in charge of Chechnya for only 15 years, while the record was 27 years. Therefore, now, Kadyrov noted, he firmly decided to go for breaking the existing record.

Let's see if I can pass this indicator

- wrote Ramzan Kadyrov.



The Chechen leader also noted that he had no right to leave his post, as the people entrusted him with the leadership of the republic. Now, according to Kadyrov, his sacred duty is to meet the expectations of his compatriots. Therefore, he can leave the post only by asking permission from the people and the Russian president. Now, Kadyrov noted, he will not even take the required annual leave.

Kadyrov connected this decision with the fact that Russia is now in a very responsible position. She is fighting, in the words of the Chechen leader, with "world Satanism" in the Donbass. Therefore, he cannot go on vacation, like other heads of regions and military personnel of all ranks.

Kadyrov also stressed that excellent news. According to the head of the Chechen Republic, the allied troops are successfully fighting the enemy, crushing him and occupying more and more territories. Kadyrov promised to announce other good news soon.

In addition, the head of Chechnya announced help to the warring units - several thousand "resolute volunteers" trained in the Chechen Republic should go to Ukraine to participate in a special military operation. Also, the head of the Chechen Republic noted, new units of professional military personnel have already been created - two regiments and three battalions.

Thus, with his statement, Kadyrov confirmed the earlier information in the media that the words about indefinite leave were nothing more than another joke, trolling of the liberal part of the Russian political scene. In fact, of course, the Chechen leader will not leave his post at the peak of his popularity. Especially when you consider that there really are still so many unresolved issues in Ukraine.
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. GNM
    +10
    6 September 2022 09: 27
    The British Queen and Lukashenka are wary...
    1. +15
      6 September 2022 09: 35
      I don’t know about Lisa, but Lukashenko is a strong man, if in every region of Russia there were such business executives, and not obsequious opportunists, then I assure you it would be much better.
    2. +2
      6 September 2022 10: 15
      Under Kadyrov, Chechnya has ceased to be a zone of terrorism. so if he can, let him continue to lead.
      1. AUL
        -2
        6 September 2022 10: 53
        Quote: Wend
        Under Kadyrov, Chechnya has ceased to be a zone of terrorism. so if he can, let him continue to lead.

        And try to stop paying tribute to him from all over Russia - see what happens! wink
        1. +2
          6 September 2022 10: 59
          Quote from AUL
          Quote: Wend
          Under Kadyrov, Chechnya has ceased to be a zone of terrorism. so if he can, let him continue to lead.

          And try to stop paying tribute to him from all over Russia - see what happens! wink

          Russia was restoring its territory destroyed during the terrorist war. Do you think we are also paying tribute to Crimea now? And Donbass too?
        2. +3
          6 September 2022 13: 01
          Quote from AUL
          And try to stop paying tribute to him from all over Russia - see what happens!

          Chechnya has not received any subsidies from the budget for several years, on the contrary, it has become a budget donor. Your information is out of date.
          1. AUL
            0
            6 September 2022 13: 53
            Quote: bayard
            Chechnya has not received any subsidies from the budget for several years, on the contrary, it has become a budget donor.

            A source of information?
            1. +3
              6 September 2022 15: 55
              All TV channels talked about it, Ramzan spoke about it, there were articles on this topic. Already several years ago. Perhaps four years.
              There is oil in Chechnya, there is industry, agriculture, in Donetsk a few years ago juices and drinks from Chechnya appeared - very good quality. Now, unfortunately, they are not visible, but at one time I tried.
              Ramzan then said well - like "Russia helped us very seriously in restoring the republic, we received a lot of money over the years. But now we are refusing subsidies from the state budget, because the economy has strengthened and we have become self-sufficient. From next year, Chechnya will become a donor to the state budget of Russia ". And she became.
              By the way, the battalions of volunteers in Chechnya are equipped (in any case, the first battalions, it was definitely the case) at the expense of the republican budget. And they are equipped and provided very well.
              And we have a very good attitude towards Ramzan and his fighters in the Donbass.
              There are no homosexuals and other perverts in Chechnya, there are no abandoned orphans, there are no beggars, even the homeless no longer seem to exist. What is not an example for other regions.

              And yet - in these half a year Chechnya has formed up to 9 battalions of volunteers for the Northern Military District + 3 battalions and one regiment for the Moscow Region. And they are fighting for Russia and Russians in the Donbass and all of the former Ukraine. And defenders must be respected.
              They are Vainakhs - hereditary warriors. If a warrior is left without war and without service, he easily becomes a bandit, because of temperament, hormones, the search for an outlet for energy. Therefore, the Vainakh definitely needs a service.
              And who then knocked them out to war with Russia, who then (in 1992) formed their militia from criminals (since 2014 it also happened in / in Ukraine), flooded their land with mercenaries and bandits from all over the world, and how it all ended for them then, they now know and remember better than you and me. And this will no longer be allowed.
              By the way, today I received information that thousands of Mujahideen from Afghanistan are going to fight for Russia - in the name of Allah against the USA and their shaitans.
              ... Suddenly .
              1. AUL
                -4
                6 September 2022 16: 51
                Dear, you contradict yourself!
                One side -
                There is oil in Chechnya, there is industry, agriculture ....
                And on the other -
                And yet - in these half a year Chechnya has formed up to 9 battalions of volunteers for the Northern Military District + 3 battalions and one regiment for the Moscow Region.
                Who works so hard there when all the men are in the service, and apart from how to fight, they don’t know how to do anything? And women do not work there by tradition.
                1. +3
                  6 September 2022 17: 47
                  Quote from AUL
                  Dear, you contradict yourself!

                  What is it in?
                  if there are 500-600 people in each battalion, then in addition to volunteers (and they are far from being only Chechens - volunteers flocked / flock there from all over Russia), then 9 + 6 = 15 battalions. And this is a maximum of 8-10 thousand people (with non-Chechens). So there is someone to work there.
          2. +2
            6 September 2022 19: 38
            I would like to believe! Your words are in God's ears ...
  2. +8
    6 September 2022 09: 32
    I believe that Putin will not be able to move Ramzan, even if he really wants to. Too odious, powerful, brutal and dangerous, he gained both power and appropriated powers that Chechen policemen can find and take away anyone they want in any region.
    But, from the point of view of the current moment, NWO, attempts from the outside to shake the Transcaucasus and the Caucasus, Ramzan, for now, with all the future disadvantages and difficulties, is in his place. He is the mouthpiece and main corkscrew of the NWO. If you want - the spirit of the military company.
    And why hide it, Chechen fighters have shown themselves everywhere on the positive side. There are exceptions everywhere, but in general they are.
    1. +5
      6 September 2022 09: 35
      A lot of fighters and units of the Russian Armed Forces showed and showed themselves very well.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. 0
      6 September 2022 19: 47
      Plus you about Ramzan Akhmatovich, but the mouthpiece and main corkscrew of the NWO, nevertheless, Vladimir Volfovich, the Kingdom of Heaven, who left untimely and at the wrong time ...
  3. +2
    6 September 2022 09: 33
    It is not important how much you are in power, but what you do, exactly what you do, this has nothing to do with past merits. Kadyrov is exactly in his place and do not talk about financial injections into the republic, the result is visible and obvious. During the special operation, Kadyrov's fighters showed themselves in all their glory.
    1. nnm
      +3
      6 September 2022 09: 39
      And the opinion of the commander of the Vostok battalion, who has been at war for many years, is about nothing?
      And even then he had to practically apologize for what he said. Don't you think this is a dangerous trend?
      1. +2
        6 September 2022 11: 50
        Quote: nnm
        And even then he had to practically apologize for what he said. Don't you think this is a dangerous trend?

        So this trend has long been in the Russian Federation. Diaspora and national minorities in Russia are in a special position. Recently, the director of a Tyumen school apologized for not letting a girl in a hijab through.
    2. nnm
      +8
      6 September 2022 09: 52
      But did the fighters of dozens of other nationalities and nationalities show themselves worse? This is a common thing and it is absolutely not right to single out someone.
    3. 0
      6 September 2022 09: 53
      Quote from Silver99
      During the special operation, Kadyrov's fighters showed themselves in all their glory.

      I agree with everything.
      Please answer the question: how do you feel about the phrase "Putin's fighters"?
      I would be very worried about such a connection.
      Because it's not right.
      A second question immediately arose: whose fighters will Kadyrov's fighters become when he resigns as head of Chechnya. No matter when, God bless him.
      1. 0
        6 September 2022 10: 04
        Yes, I also treat the phrase private military company, what's new? whose is she? In relation to whom they will be, so in your opinion the army should be ethnically united? otherwise, God forbid, the power will change and they will not apply their knowledge there. No, it doesn't depend on that.
        1. 0
          6 September 2022 10: 12
          Quote from Silver99
          Yes, I also treat the phrase private military company, what's new?

          PMCs have no nationality, traditions, roots and a common small homeland.
          PMCs are more dependent on the federal government and less dependent on a conditional leader.
          Especially - the leader of the national, which certainly is Ramzan Akhmatovich.

          Quote from Silver99
          do you think the army should be ethnically united?

          Of course not.
          But its units should not line up along national lines.
          And they should not be controlled by the regional authorities.
          Because it is the RF Armed Forces.
          And in this sense, some regions should not have advantages over others.
          Although we all understand that there are differences in mentality and traditions.
          However, the law is the same for all.
          And first of all we are citizens of Russia, and only then we are Russians, Tatars, Buryats and Chechens.
          1. nnm
            0
            6 September 2022 12: 19
            We must start with the fact that PMCs are not just not provided for by Russian law, but generally contradict it !!! Well, no, apart from government agencies, no one has the right to own and use such weapons. And for some reason, for so many years we cannot adopt a law on PMCs
      2. -4
        6 September 2022 10: 12
        Quote: Flood
        A second question immediately arose: whose fighters will Kadyrov's fighters become when he resigns as head of Chechnya.

        Or will Putin leave the presidency (under any circumstances - life is not eternal)?
        *****
        Chasing terms in power doesn't matter if your people hate you.
        Kadyrov did a lot for his republic, and then ... Let's wait and see.
        1. +2
          6 September 2022 10: 17
          Quote: yuriy55
          Kadyrov did a lot for his republic

          There is no doubt about that.
          My reasoning is from the point of view of an ordinary citizen of the Russian Federation, and not of the Chechen Republic.
          1. +4
            6 September 2022 10: 35
            I read your posts and I don't blame you for anything. Just expressed my point of view.
            I already wrote once and I can repeat that the formation of the Armed Forces on a national basis or independent armed formations in a single region is unacceptable.
            All subjects of the Federation have equal rights to a decent life, and not life according to the principle: we don’t know how to do anything else, or we will live as bequeathed by the great ...
            Only equality of law FOR ALL.
  4. +7
    6 September 2022 09: 34
    By popular demand, I'm staying.
    1. +2
      6 September 2022 10: 37
      Quote: ALARI
      By popular demand, I'm staying.

      Yeah ... It used to be - there is an opinion.
      1. +5
        6 September 2022 10: 45
        There is an opinion, at the numerous requests of workers, veterans, residents and comrades, collectives of factories, factories and collective farms, to further improve life, I stay. Yes it's better smile
        1. +2
          6 September 2022 11: 08
          Quote: ALARI
          Yes it's better

          More democratic... lol
  5. +2
    6 September 2022 09: 34
    Kadyrov remains: the Head of Chechnya decided to break the record of being the head of the region

    It's time to put this nonsense out of your head - the limit of being in power. And I'm not just talking about Kadyrov. The person has gained a managerial form, has become a professional in his field, does his job one hundred percent - happy anniversary! Time to get out! Steering a little - let someone else steer! We will get used to it for a hundred days, don’t beat me for sins - I’m getting into the nuances ... Heresy! A person can steer - let him rule. Any doubts? Debriefing, referendum, re-elections. The country is waging two wars and Kadyrov is doing a great job - he is preparing personnel, and the one who fired this bullet with the departure is working for the enemy! am
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      6 September 2022 10: 28
      Want a king? only for some reason later with us, figs knock this king out of his chair, even if he is no longer a very manager .. remember the late Brezhnev ..
      1. +1
        6 September 2022 10: 46
        Quote: Level 2 Advisor
        remember the late Brezhnev ..

        And why remember the late LIB, who was simply not allowed to leave?
        Let's remember the "middle" and "late" GMS ... Let's designate for ourselves and everyone else the deep conclusions of Ms. Tereshkova [Volodina] (by the way, where does she wear it, why won't she say anything about the SVO?)
        Everyone who still believes in a good tsar and evil boyars is gravely mistaken.
        I understand that we both agree that:

        hi
  6. nnm
    +2
    6 September 2022 09: 42
    Yes, in general, you just need to throw out the constitution, or rewrite it (oh, yes ... already!) And let them rule for life!
    With your friends, relatives, classmates, etc.
    And do not talk about excellent managers and rulers - any power should not be infinite. This leads to corruption. Both political and financial. With no exceptions. Is always.
    No wonder there is a time limit for such positions.
    1. -1
      6 September 2022 09: 44
      And let's how to choose a prime minister in Britain 0,1% of the population, 80 thousand chose an aunt and everyone is happy, democracy ((((
      1. nnm
        +4
        6 September 2022 09: 47
        You are not right in the root understand the system of their elections. This is a parliamentary republic. And initially there are direct elections of deputies. And the example is unsuccessful - you can even just in your wildest fantasy imagine that the first person of the state would actually receive impeachment for a party during covid or harassment of his not even close subordinates ??
        Well, be honest with yourself...
        1. -2
          6 September 2022 09: 57
          Well, at the expense of root correctness, the truth is not yours, or do you think that the people choose leaders for the West? funny, I won’t tell you secrets, they choose money bags, do you want examples? yes, no one knew Macron as much as you like, the rating was zero before the elections, the same Trust flew out with a bang, everyone wrote it off and now it’s back on you, or do you think there are democratic elections in the USA, yeah, as it were, an electoral college dependent on financial circles.
    2. +2
      6 September 2022 10: 05
      Quote: nnm
      let them rule for life!

      Making turnover an end in itself is no less nonsense.
      Removability is just one of the imperfect methods of protection against fools and bribe-takers in power that do not guarantee results.
      But much worse than a fool in power is a string of fools, each of whom begins to cut a country or region according to his own stupid understanding.

      That's why I agree with the comment above.
      If you can manage effectively for the benefit of the people - do it as long as you are able.
      1. -2
        6 September 2022 10: 22
        Quote: Flood
        If you can manage effectively for the benefit of the people - do it as long as you are able.

        Right! Personally, I would like Kadyrov to become governor-general of the liberated territories after the end of the North Military District. At least temporarily. He would straighten it out.
      2. nnm
        +3
        6 September 2022 10: 39
        1. The issue of responsibility to the voter. You yourself write everything correctly - and there she flew off the post, and then impeachment, here the ruling party changed - because under the parliamentary system, with direct elections, even with electors (look at how the same states vote - more than once for at once for the same party, but financial circles are unchanged) the government understands that it is replaceable. Look at how many cabinets of ministers in Italy have changed 5 or 12 in 14 years? If you take closer to the subject of VO, then just remember his saying that after a couple of years you can do with the rear. And transfer the analogy not just to some kind of warehouse, but to the economy and resources of the whole country, which are at the disposal of an irreplaceable group of people.
        2. And again, responsibility - first of all, we, the voters, should have it - we must first of all ask ourselves questions - why settle for cheap PR or why have we forgotten that we have been promised every time for many years, and then spit on promises, we let them. This is how a responsible civil society is nurtured.
        3. How do you rate the effectiveness of the board? Do you have something to compare? And there is no need to start about the 90s - this is the time of lessons learned and we must a priori understand that those mistakes are in the past. We simply should not repeat them by default. How do you evaluate the effectiveness without knowing a modern alternative? Compared income in recent years and the pace of development of the country? Or, perhaps, in terms of the dynamics of high-tech production, science, education, or the growth in incomes of the population, its social benefits, social justice?
        1. 0
          6 September 2022 13: 31
          Quote: nnm
          responsibility again - first of all, we, the voters, should have it - we must first of all ask ourselves questions - why settle for cheap PR or why have we forgotten that we have been promised every time for many years

          beautiful utopia
          city ​​of Sun
          almost communism
          where ideal citizens live in an ideal society
          such a problem has several solutions and many logical dead ends

          Quote: nnm
          how do you rate the effectiveness of the board? Do you have something to compare? And do not start about the 90s

          Today's youth loves such arguments. "And don't tell me about the Soviet Union. That was a long time ago."
          Everyone has the right to their opinion.
          Do you have tools for an objective assessment?
          1. nnm
            0
            6 September 2022 15: 56
            1. Excuse me, but what do you see as a utopia that citizens should be responsible for their choice? Maybe if we stop talking about religion to children at school, and talk about responsibility for every choice in our lives, then we will get not a crowd, but a thinking generation? Not with propaganda stamps, not blaming everyone around for their failures, but understanding the price of each of their decisions? And not what he thinks "Yes, I will not go to the polls, because everything will be decided without me."
            What is the utopia of not considering your own people as a herd? Why did the USSR start by teaching the most downtrodden peasants to read and write and come to a place where half of the Academy of Sciences came from the wilderness, which no one had even heard of.
            2. The simplest question - will you be led by beautiful fairy tales after the 90s? No. As well as those who lived through them. And therefore, it’s not about the fact that you don’t need to talk about something (on the contrary, it’s necessary without fail), but that you don’t have to assume that people have no memory, that they are just stupid and will again be led to fairy tales. We must believe in our fellow citizens.
            1. +1
              6 September 2022 18: 48
              Quote: nnm
              Excuse me, but what do you see as a utopia that citizens should be responsible for their choice?

              Decide first what kind of responsibility you are writing about.
              It is important.
              We are all responsible for the consequences of our mistakes.
              Your well-being and wallet.

              But you started with a different responsibility. With the one that would make citizens more thoughtful and more demanding of themselves and the candidate approach the issue of voting.

              Well, yes, it was. A kind of Voltairianism. There are only beautiful bright faces and world peace around.
              But the reality is that even in order to comply with the elementary rules of behavior in any society, the state introduces a system of fines and punishments.
              Because it comes from an understanding of human nature, and not from beautiful impulses.

              These are the rules of conduct for the human masses.
              They are trusting and easy to manage.
              These are the laws of society, if you like.
              And in order for something to change significantly, it is necessary to go through the stages of evolution.
              1. nnm
                0
                6 September 2022 18: 59
                I'll try to shift our dialogue a little to a more realistic plane.
                We are introducing electronic voting everywhere. Why, for example, doesn't each deputy establish on the official website the obligation to post, for example, 10-15 of his election promises. And once a year he is obliged to post a report on their performance. And voters also ask online questions. And according to the results of the report, in the electronic system, voters have the right to vote for the extension of the term or for the recall of this deputy. Technically, more than possible. Plus, it will allow the deputies not to consider that their election is a ticket to the seventh heaven without a recall.
                I just mean that there are always options. But, of course, responsibility must be taught from an early age. Including the importance of your voice.
      3. 0
        6 September 2022 10: 49
        Quote: Flood
        If you can manage effectively for the benefit of the people - do it until while able

        ...until the people say (legally and legally):
        "Enough! Enough!"
      4. 0
        6 September 2022 13: 36
        Quote: Flood
        If you can manage effectively for the benefit of the people - do it as long as you are able.

        The nuance is that with irremovability - throughout the country, as a result, only supporters of the main thing will be in power (which is logical and natural - not to put "strangers"?) And if he suddenly starts to rule "badly", you can’t change him in any way - there will be no one .. Which can, with no small probability, lead to very bad consequences for the whole country because of one person ..
        1. 0
          6 September 2022 13: 41
          Quote: Level 2 Advisor
          The nuance is that with irremovability - throughout the country, as a result, only supporters of the main

          You are right.
          It could be like this, or it could be like that.
          There is no way to guess ahead of time.
          Sometimes the road to hell is paved with the best of intentions.
          1. +1
            6 September 2022 13: 51
            in my opinion .. no matter how strange it may be .. everything is right in England .. there is a monarch who is not elected by anyone and in extreme cases has the right to remove the prime minister (head of the executive branch) and indeed anyone from power .. therefore "his" it won’t be possible to put it everywhere and become bronzed - there is a “controller” in the person of the monarch, who kicks in the ass if anything ... and for this person to do everything for the good of the country, the monarch is very interested .. at the same time, the monarch does not climb into the depths of the economy, without interfering with the work of the government in certain issues .. and the system is very stable turns out ..
            1. +1
              6 September 2022 13: 58
              Quote: Level 2 Advisor
              everything is right in england

              Yeah
              the election of the prime minister was epic
              at least poured people a mug of beer
              to make them feel like they belong
              1. 0
                6 September 2022 14: 20
                well, for the people - yes .. epic .. I talked about the stability of the system .. and under the monarchy, the people are not the main voice .. as well as not under the monarchy ..
    3. 0
      6 September 2022 10: 16
      Quote: nnm
      This leads to corruption. Both political and financial. With no exceptions. Is always.
      No wonder there is a time limit for such positions.

      In addition to all of the above, this leads to degradation, decomposition and, as a result, a catastrophe. Any person, group of people, who has been at the pinnacle of power for a long time, loses touch with reality, which is greatly helped by the environment, which inflates in such a way that it is no longer up to objectivity. We are all watching this now.
      But of course, there are exceptions to any rule .. you need to judge by the results ... Stalin's results were obvious to every citizen of the country .. now, the result is minus in all directions.
      1. +1
        6 September 2022 11: 05
        Quote: Svarog
        Any person, group of people, who is at the top of power for a long time, losing touch with reality in which the environment helps him a lot, which blows in such a way that it is no longer up to objectivity.

        I agree. The opinions of press secretaries who "can only carry a blizzard" or the image on the monitor are not relevant, but "President's Vacation" or:

        possible only in the cinema.
        Quote: Svarog
        right now, the result is negative in all directions.

        Not always, let's be sincere and honest...
        In addition, the lack of results is also a result.
  7. +2
    6 September 2022 09: 43
    East is a delicate matter. There is no way to change the leadership like gloves. Cherevato various surprises. Not always beneficial.
  8. 0
    6 September 2022 11: 57
    Kadyrov remains: the Head of Chechnya decided to break the record of being the head of the region

    Correctly. Let him take an example from the commander in chief.
  9. 0
    6 September 2022 12: 12
    Let it stay, literate uncle.
  10. 0
    6 September 2022 20: 38
    I thought for a moment that Ramzan Akhmatovich had disagreements with Vladimir Vladimirovich over Ukraine. Already, he was very eager to take Kyiv. And, having received no support, he was offended. So I'm wrong. Good luck to you, Ramzan Akhmatovich, I wish you good health.
    1. +1
      6 September 2022 20: 47
      Quote: Crispy
      I thought that Ramzan Akhmatovich had disagreements with Vladimir Vladimirovich over Ukraine

      Disagreements between the subordinate and the boss predictably ended in a consensus ... based on the point of view of the boss.
  11. 0
    6 September 2022 20: 55
    Quote: Repellent
    Quote: Crispy
    I thought that Ramzan Akhmatovich had disagreements with Vladimir Vladimirovich over Ukraine

    Disagreements between the subordinate and the boss predictably ended in a consensus ... based on the point of view of the boss.

    Opinion exchange. You come in with yours, you leave with the opinion of the boss.
  12. NSV
    0
    7 September 2022 16: 17
    Let it work!!! Though there is still silence!