How the Bolsheviks liberated Russian Ukraine for the first time

28
How the Bolsheviks liberated Russian Ukraine for the first time
Monument in Kharkov in honor of the proclamation of Soviet power in Ukraine. The monument was founded in 1967, dismantled in 2011.


General situation


In early January 1918, supporters of the Soviet Ukraine, of which Kharkov became the capital, began to form their armed forces, including the so-called. "Red Cossacks", launched an attack on Kyiv (How the Central Rada became the instigator of the Civil War in Russia).



In response, on January 11, 1918, the Rada issued its Fourth Universal - this was the declaration of independence of the Ukrainian People's Republic (UNR). Kyiv immediately received the diplomatic support of Austria-Hungary and Germany. On January 12, the head of the Austrian delegation in Brest, Foreign Minister Count Ottokar Chernin, announced the recognition of the Ukrainian delegation by the Austro-German bloc as a plenipotentiary representative of the sovereign UNR. The Quadruple Alliance needed the resources of Little Russia to continue the war and simply survive. Vienna and other major cities in Austria were already starving. And in winter they froze without coal. The lack of fuel also affected the potential of the military industry. True, Berlin and Vienna thought about their own interests, not the Rada. Kyiv did not receive material assistance from the Germans.

At the end of December 1917, Kharkov and Chernigov were already under the control of the Red Guard detachments. Everywhere, except Yekaterinoslav (later Dnepropetrovsk, now the Dnieper), Soviet power was established peacefully. In Ekaterinoslav, the future "whites" resisted the Reds - detachments of Russian officers, students, high school students, etc. The Rada sent its guards to Poltava - the Bogdanovsky regiment, but the Bogdanovites did not want to fight, but engaged in pogroms and robberies, returned to Kyiv with a lot of booty . Under the control of the Central Rada remained Kyiv, part of the Right Bank, partly Chernihiv, Poltava, Yekaterinoslav and Kherson provinces, where there were separate, scattered detachments of supporters of "independence".

"Red Napoleon"


In early January, the Council of People's Commissars of the RSFSR and the People's Secretariat of the Ukrainian People's Republic of Soviets (UNRS) decided on a joint armed offensive against the troops of the UNR. The main blow was planned through Poltava to Kyiv. The troops were led by Chief of Staff of the Southern Front Mikhail Muravyov. The former tsarist officer, who went uphill after the February Revolution, was actively working to create volunteer shock battalions. After the defeat of the rebellion, Kornila broke off relations with Kerensky and went over to the Left SRs. After the October Revolution, he joined the Bolsheviks.

Muravyov was distinguished by courage and adventurism. Antonov-Ovseenko, who worked closely with him in Little Russia (commander of the Southern Front), called Muravyov "a bold adventurer and an extremely weak politician," who expressed himself in "high calm" and "always lived in a daze." Muravyov indulged the soldier, its worst manifestations. He allowed soldiers to plunder and sack occupied villages and cities.

Tukhachevsky, whom Muravyov almost shot, gave him a capacious description:

“Ants was distinguished by frenzied ambition, remarkable personal courage and the ability to electrify the masses of soldiers ... The thought of “becoming Napoleon” haunted him, and this definitely showed through in all his manners, conversations and actions. He did not know how to assess the situation. His tasks were completely unimportant. He couldn't manage. He interfered in trifles, even commanded companies. He fawned over the Red Army. In order to win their love for himself, he allowed them to rob with impunity, used the most shameless demagoguery, and so on. He was extremely cruel. In general, Muravyov's abilities were many times inferior to the scale of his claims. He was a selfish adventurer, and nothing more.


M. A. Muravyov in full dress uniform of an officer of the Military Educational Department, with awards (1914)

To Kiev


From Kharkov to Poltava, a detachment of Red Guards and Red Cossacks led the offensive under the command of Vitaly Primakov (the organizer of the Red Cossacks). A detachment of Petrograd and Moscow Red Guards under the command of Pavel Yegorov, an armored train and Red Guards from Yasinovataya under the command of Dmitry Zhloba were coming from the Lozovaya station. The offensive in the main direction was also supported by a special detachment from Moscow under the command of Znamensky, who advanced from Vorozhba station. An auxiliary blow towards the city of Sumy was delivered by the Kharkov detachment of the Red Guard, led by Nikolai Rudnev.

The main offensive was carried out along the Kharkiv-Poltava-Kyiv railway line. The troops during this period of the Civil War worked within the framework of the tactics of "echelon warfare", when small detachments operated along the railways, occupying the most important cities and stations. The entire "army" of Muravyov consisted of about 8 thousand bayonets and sabers. Numerically, the red detachments were small, but in every city and county there were many of their supporters.

Also, the situation was used by criminal elements, bandits who wanted to take a walk, rob and "feel" the bourgeoisie. Such fathers, chieftains have bred throughout the Russian Ukraine since the autumn of 1917, when the incapacity of the Provisional Government became obvious to everyone. The atamans claimed to be fighting for the rights of the "oppressed villagers" and often shared their booty with the locals. And most of the villagers supported gangs, joined the ranks of "self-defense", various gangs, participated in robberies and pogroms of the "city", hid the stolen property.

On January 5 (18), 1918, a battle began on the outskirts of Poltava. The Poltava garrison was not ready for it. On the eve of his main forces were withdrawn to Kyiv to suppress the workers' uprising. Mostly resisted officers and cadets, who had nothing to do with the idea of ​​​​Ukrainian "independence". On January 6 (19), the Reds occupied Poltava without any problems. Muravyov ordered the prisoners to be shot.

Hundreds of Primakov developed an offensive against Kyiv. Also, the Reds occupied the territory of the Chernihiv, Sumy and Poltava regions without any problems. Skirmishes with Ukrainian troops were sluggish and fleeting, the Haidamaks usually simply scattered at the appearance of the Reds and the slightest pressure. Nobody wanted to die for the "independent Nenko Ukraine". Ukrainian nationalism was still the property of a small part of the intelligentsia. And the Ukrainians themselves did not want to die for “independence”, chatting and shouting from the podium (and even for a good ration, awards and other cookies) is one thing, but going to the bayonet is quite another. The common people took for granted life in a single Russian state, did not divide themselves into Russians and "Ukrainians". And the very name of the state "Ukraine" only sounded.

Protect the central council? So she was also one of the Februaryist revolutionaries. The Bolsheviks promised more blessings. Yes, and the army of Sich Riflemen consisted of the same decomposed soldiers of the former imperial army. They wanted to receive supplies, go for walks, enrich themselves if possible. The Red detachments were usually more united, ideological, although there were enough different rabble.

Odessa Soviet Republic


At the same time, the Reds took over in Odessa. Since the end of 1917, clashes between supporters and opponents of Soviet power have taken place in the city. It came to skirmishes between the Red Guards and the Haidamaks. On January 10, 1918, the commissar of the Odessa Military District, Lieutenant Colonel Poplavko, tried to disarm the pro-Soviet units. It failed to do so.

On the night of January 13-14 (26-27) in Odessa, the uprising of Rumcherod (Council of Soldiers' Deputies from the Romanian Front, Black Sea fleet and Odessa), which stood on Soviet positions. Supporters of Kyiv were about 2 thousand people, Reds - 3,5 thousand people. A detachment on destroyers advanced from Sevastopol to help the uprising.

By the morning of January 14, the rebels occupied the headquarters of the Odessa military district, the station, the telephone exchange, the post office and the telegraph. However, on January 15, Ukrainian units and cadets launched a counterattack, recaptured the station, where reinforcements began to arrive. The Gaidamaks and the Junkers pressed the Reds. However, on January 16, the rebels were supported by fire from the ships of the Black Sea Fleet - the battleships Sinop, Rostislav and the cruiser Almaz. From the side of the Odessa-Tovarnaya station, the Zaamurets self-propelled armored car advanced on the Ukrainian units. The main armament of the motorized armored car consisted of two coastal guns designed by Nordenfeld, caliber 57 mm, which had a high rate of fire - 60 rounds per minute. The armored car was also armed with 12 Maxim machine guns.

By January 17 (30), the Reds recaptured the previously lost positions, captured the Odessa Military School. The Gaidamaks capitulated. On the evening of January 18, the Central Executive Committee of Rumcherod elected the Council of People's Commissars of the Odessa Soviet Republic (OSR), which recognized the supreme power in the person of the Petrograd SNK and the Soviet government in Kharkov. Vladimir Yudovsky was elected Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the OSR (SNKOR). The leadership of the OSR stated that it was subordinate only to Petrograd, and the republic (Odessa and Bessarabia provinces) was not part of Ukraine, since it had a mostly non-Ukrainian population.

On January 21, the funeral of the victims of the three-day battle in Odessa took place. All were buried in a mass grave on the Kulikovo field. During the fighting, 119 people died, 359 were wounded.

Muravyov, who led the armed forces of the OSR, began terror. In particular, the Naval Tribunal was organized on the Almaz cruiser, where officers were executed. The unfortunate were thrown into furnaces, doused with water on the deck, turning people into blocks of ice that were dumped into the sea.

To be continued ...
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    20 August 2022 06: 06
    "Red Napoleon"
    It is interesting how his current figures in the cinema of Ukraine show a purely negative element, a psychopath, a drug addict who shoots ordinary Ukrainians from a passing train ...
    1. +4
      20 August 2022 06: 16
      That the Russian enemies of the USSR, that the Ukrainian ones have the same ideology, to slander the Bolshevik communists more, in order to make themselves better than those, and this to justify their seizure of the RSFSR and the Ukrainian SSR.
      1. -5
        20 August 2022 07: 14
        And where did the enemies of the communists go?
        In this civil war, everyone was well marked in terror ... both whites and reds and Petliurists and Haidamaks and gray-brown-crimson anarchists and greens.
        Ordinary people watched this meat grinder with horror ... the whites will come to rob ... the reds will come again to rob ... the Petliurists did not know the measures at all in robberies.
        This revolution cost dearly to the people of Russia and Ukraine ... there were too many victims ... too much dirt and evil spirits surfaced.
        1. +1
          20 August 2022 07: 28
          And what about the revolution? Civil war has never been a priori a consequence of revolutions in world history.
          It was the Russian enemies of the Bolsheviks, together with the occupiers of Russia, the interventionists, who unleashed the Civil War in order to overthrow the power of the Bolsheviks. If, after your counter-revolution in your Perestroika, it was the communists and their supporters who created armed armies, began to kill you, seize the territories of the USSR, would you blame yourself and your counter-revolution for all this this time?
          Or, as always, among the enemies of the communists, "Is this different?"
          1. -6
            20 August 2022 08: 34
            The Bolshevik Sverdlov destroyed the Don Cossacks as a class ... entire villages were demolished and burned and shot along with the population, how is it?
            The communist Trotsky had a hand in the mass terror of the Russian population...
            the communist Tukhachesky did not disdain to use mass executions of hostages and chemical shells on settlements ... how is that?
            Is that different too...?
            There are a lot of skeletons in the closet of the communists that they would prefer not to advertise.
            1. +2
              20 August 2022 17: 49
              Write also that they ate babies. Stop spreading anti-Soviet nonsense already.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
            2. +2
              21 August 2022 08: 24
              And when the whites did the same - how is it?
            3. 0
              25 August 2022 11: 07
              1. As a class - yes. They destroyed it so much that they fought in the Second World War led by Krasnov and Paunwitz. Pravdv, yet most of the KA.
              2. The communist Trotsky (he was not in the Bolsheviks until the summer of 1917, and, as it turned out later, he was not at all) had a hand in the terror not only of the Russian population, but of many others.
              3. Tukhachevsky used chemical shells sporadically and showed their complete unsuitability. This has been written about many times.
              There are many skeletons in the closet of the communists, like all other active forces of the 20th century, but these "skeletons" are very attracted.
            4. 0
              12 September 2022 18: 38
              Chemical shells for us. points? Cool ! And which one is us. point, what is written in the training manual? wink
          2. +4
            20 August 2022 09: 38
            Quote: tatra
            And what about the revolution? Civil war has never been a priori a consequence of revolutions in world history.

            Well, of course ... The Great French Revolution immediately developed into a Civil Revolution, where one part of the population enthusiastically killed another ...
            1. +1
              21 August 2022 15: 11
              In England, after the beheading of King Charles, did not civil war break out? The Mexican revolution grew into a civil one. In the United States, revolutionary reforms, incl. the abolition of slavery led to a civil war. In 1945, Chinese communist revolutionaries led by Mao Zedong seized power from the democratically elected government of Chiang Kai-shek and a civil war broke out after that. The Khmer Rouge seized power in Cambodia and unleashed a civil war. There were several civil wars in the Roman Empire, either after the so-called peaceful revolutions (major state reforms), or as a result of a violent change of power (the assassination of Caesar). In late Rome, several emperors were killed per year, i.e. mini revolutions were made and mass riots broke out every time - mini civil wars. As a result, the empire bled, weakened and collapsed. Civil wars are the final result of major social, state reforms (peaceful revolutions), or revolutions are not peaceful.
          3. +3
            20 August 2022 11: 22
            "The consequence of revolutions in world history has never a priori been a Civil War.
            It was the Russian enemies of the Bolsheviks, together with the occupiers of Russia, the interventionists, who unleashed the Civil War "
            It's amazing what a mess you have in your head ... You already decide whether to take off your cross or put on panties crying
        2. +4
          20 August 2022 09: 14
          Quote: Lech from Android.
          This revolution cost dearly to the people of Russia and Ukraine ... there were too many victims ... too much dirt and evil spirits surfaced.

          In Ukraine, Bandera hate the Soviet and regret it, but in our country - Lech from Android.
        3. +2
          20 August 2022 17: 01
          It was not the Revolution that killed people, but the Civil War unleashed by the Whites!
          1. Kim
            -1
            22 August 2022 05: 49
            cannibalism in the 33rd - is it also organized by whites? and the execution on the Lena in, EMNIP, 37th? and Novocherkassk under Khrushchev? what scoundrels they are, whites ...
    2. +3
      20 August 2022 08: 15
      . Hundreds of Primakov developed an offensive against Kyiv. Also red occupied the territory without any problems Chernihiv, Sumy and Poltava regions. Skirmishes with Ukrainian troops were sluggish and fleeting, the Haidamaks usually simply scattered at the appearance of the Reds and the slightest pressure. Nobody wanted to die for the "independent Nenko Ukraine".

      It's all different now. Our power is not red and the Ukrainians do not want to give up the territory easily.

      It was just that the Bolsheviks offered a new just life and a promising future to the oppressed peoples.

      And what does the current Russian government offer besides demilitarization and denazification? Change some oligarchs for others?
  2. +8
    20 August 2022 06: 21
    In V. Kataev's "Waves of the Black Sea / Winter Wind" the events of 1917/1918 in Odessa are described much more interestingly.
    1. +1
      20 August 2022 09: 40
      Quote: Amateur
      In V. Kataev's "Waves of the Black Sea / Winter Wind" the events of 1917/1918 in Odessa are described much more interestingly.

      More ... described, otherwise Paustovsky, Bulgakov described these events well
  3. -6
    20 August 2022 06: 56
    and the "Bolsheviks" are they from what planet???
    1. +3
      20 August 2022 07: 29
      With the same as the enemies of the Bolsheviks.
      1. -4
        20 August 2022 08: 55
        that is, the same ones, so why write stupidity ??? when the Russian rulers from Stavropol and the Urals betrayed and destroyed a great country, all the republics were recognized within the existing borders, so why talk about some kind of "gifts". Crimea was handed over to Ukraine by the Supreme Council, and not Russian Khrushchev. "Nikita Sergeevich Khrushchev was born in 1894 in the village of Kalinovka, Olkhovskaya volost, Dmitrievsky district, Kursk province (now the Khomutovsky district of the Kursk region) in the family of a miner Sergei Nikanorovich Khrushchev (d. 1938) and Xenia Ivanovna Khrushcheva (1872-1945).Two years later, the younger sister Irina was born[9].Russian origin is noted in memoirs, speeches[10] and personal data[11][12][13]; At the time of his appointment to work in the Ukrainian SSR, he did not speak Ukrainian, which is why he opposed translation[14]." - Wikipedia.
  4. Eug
    +2
    20 August 2022 07: 15
    Looking ahead a little - the first Soviet Ukraine ended in accordance with the Brest agreements .... regarding the monument at the beginning of the article - Kharkiv residents ironically called it either "five with a refrigerator" or "five left the pawnshop" (its building next to the monument can be seen in the photo, now in it, somewhat rebuilt, the Historical Museum). The monument itself seemed to have been removed somewhere out of sight during the reconstruction of the square, which for many years bore the name "Name of Soviet Ukraine", there was also a metro station with the same name. But I doubt very much that the monument is intact ...
  5. -5
    20 August 2022 08: 39
    Quote: Stas157
    the Bolsheviks offered a new just life and a promising future to the oppressed peoples.

    What is the price?
    1. +6
      20 August 2022 08: 52
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      What is the price?

      Are you against the fact that the Bolsheviks liberated Ukraine? Surprised.

      As for the price, at least Mariupol remained intact.

      Do you think that the current price of denazification will be much cheaper?
    2. +4
      20 August 2022 08: 58
      and look at the number and growth of the population before and after "perestroika", there are already more "does not fit" than those who died in the Second World War. https://alternathistory.com/ne-vpisalis-v-rynochnye-otnosheniya/
  6. 0
    20 August 2022 12: 39
    "How the Bolsheviks liberated the Russian Ukraine for the first time" from the Russians.
    https://zhenziyou.livejournal.com/tag/украинизация
  7. +5
    20 August 2022 12: 59
    Quote: Lech from Android.

    Ordinary people watched this meat grinder with horror ... the whites will come to rob ... the reds will come again to rob ... the Petliurists did not know the measures at all in robberies.
    This revolution cost dearly to the people of Russia and Ukraine ... there were too many victims ... too much dirt and evil spirits surfaced.

    With all due respect ... No need to level .... with a finger .. I hope that you simply did not realize the specific situation of the Civil times.

    The most expensive thing for the people was that the "white patriots" formed their armies of many thousands in 1918 in the territories occupied by the Germans, Japanese, Americans .....

    And they fought against the Russian Federation. To plunder your country under the "roof" of foreign invaders is not a weak idea?
    EFFICIENTLY!
    The sincere NOT understanding that being traitors is bad cost the people dearly.

    And gouging your own country one more time in 1991 in peacetime in order to rob one more time - no other people have ever done this in the History of Humanity.
    This is only our know-how.
  8. Kim
    +1
    22 August 2022 05: 50
    I wonder if they will tell something about "indigenization"? but this is one of the roots (or even roots) of current events