Russia temporarily withdraws its facilities from inspection under START

90

Russia withdraws from inspection activities all its facilities subject to inspection under the Treaty on Strategic Offensive Arms (START-3). As stated in the Russian Foreign Ministry, this is a temporary measure, Russia is committed to complying with all the provisions of the agreement.

Russia informed the United States of its decision to temporarily stop the admission of foreign inspectors to its facilities under the New START. This decision was made after the United States imposed sanctions against Russia, effectively banning Russian inspectors from conducting inspections on its territory. Russia several times asked to establish a violated parity, but did not receive an answer. The Americans, not wanting to correct this situation, expressed a desire to continue to check our facilities, but not allow the Russians to theirs. Now that opportunity is closed to them.



The Russian Federation is now forced to resort to this measure as a result of Washington’s persistent desire to implicitly achieve a restart of inspection activities on conditions that do not take into account existing realities, create unilateral advantages for the United States and effectively deprive the Russian Federation of the right to conduct inspections on American soil.

- stated in the message of the Foreign Ministry.

Moscow stressed that the solution is temporary, and as soon as the United States "solves all the problems" associated with the normal work of the inspection commissions, Russia will remove all the restrictions imposed.

Recall that the Strategic Offensive Arms Treaty (START-3) expires in 2026. The United States has expressed a desire to extend the treaty or conclude a new one, but while all Washington's actions indicate otherwise, the Americans want to get a lot, but at the same time give almost nothing.
90 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +47
    8 August 2022 20: 24
    Correct move. There is nothing for these rats to sniff out from us!
    1. -23
      8 August 2022 20: 28
      The move is correct ..... I wonder what the consequences will be? Who will be in the plus and who will be in the minus?
      1. +8
        8 August 2022 20: 39
        Quote: SaLaR
        Who will be in the plus and who will be in the minus?

        This question is not for us, ask it to Washington and Moscow.
        1. +5
          8 August 2022 20: 51
          The snout did not come out))) So I ask here ......... wink
          1. +6
            8 August 2022 21: 37
            Quote: SaLaR
            The snout did not come out))) So I ask here .......

            No, Washington does not need such people. There in the price of LGBT and drug addicts.
          2. 0
            9 August 2022 12: 44
            Quote: SaLaR
            The snout did not come out))) So I ask here ......... wink

            Here you can when you want! good
      2. +9
        8 August 2022 20: 45
        Something tells me that we need this control much less than the pins.
        1. +18
          8 August 2022 23: 19
          Something tells me

          something tells me that
          on Topol-M, Yars, Sineva, Bulava, Voyevoda, UR-100TTX for more than 3-4 nuclear warheads
          and also non-deployed ICBMs will be added on duty
          1550 YABCH is somehow not serious
          3500 yabch normal
          5000 CU is perfect for deterring idiots
        2. +9
          9 August 2022 01: 51
          On the contrary, I think the Americans need control most of all, in the light of the appearance in the arsenal of the Strategic Missile Forces of the Russian Federation, "Sarmatov" and "Zircons" winked wink
        3. -2
          9 August 2022 08: 00
          Given that the START Tridents cost no more than 4BB, and you can easily put 6 or even 8, I would not be so categorical in my conclusions, taking into account the actual invulnerability of the complex and the very short flight time, especially for area targets, where accuracy is secondary and you can shoot flat.
          1. -2
            9 August 2022 12: 08
            well, and that all the same, nuclear strikes will be delivered only to mines, soil complexes and naval bases
            the Americans themselves call their 3 ICBM bases - nuclear sponge
            we have 300 silos and 150 PGRKs + with the suspension of START-3, non-deployed carriers are supplemented + 150 PGRKs
            + part is already covered by 2 S-500 missile defense brigades
            300 silos x 4 BB = 1200
            300 PGRK x 6 BB = 1800
            + 200 will intercept the S-500 at altitudes of 100-70 km
            + 100 will intercept the S-400 at altitudes of 30-60 km
            + 100 will intercept the MiG-31 at altitudes of 15-30 km
            all you need is a nuclear warhead 3000 + 400 = 3400 nuclear warheads
            the USA had only 1550, even if you increase by 8 BBs it will turn out to be a stretch of 3400
            and you also need to leave the nuclear warhead to contain the PRC. Iran, North Korea
            China will not be on the sidelines when all US ICBMs run out
            - it will be repeated beating of the baby (USA)
            1. -1
              9 August 2022 12: 23
              You are kind of weird. Now, after fixing a mass launch, what's the point of striking at empty mines? For what? In the United States, the main component of the strategic nuclear forces is naval. How will you strike at the SLBM silos if you have no idea where they are at the moment?

              There is no "suspension of START", there is a suspension of inspections, which does not mean at all that everyone will run to violate START right away.

              All these numbers of yours, how much they will intercept, this is more and more fantasy, and frankly speaking, information noise. The Russian Federation is much more sensitive to nuclear weapons than the United States simply because: in the Russian Federation, residential and industrial zones are more compact and less AP is needed to defeat them. The combined West (USA, France, Britain) has more deployed BBs than the Russian Federation.
              1. -1
                9 August 2022 14: 01
                The combined West (USA, France, Britain) has more deployed warheads than the Russian Federation

                excellent START-3 in the past.
                START-4 will not be
                also an orbit over the Russian Federation up to an altitude of 600 km - we will close everything alien for spans
                you understand that someone will not have their own outer space at all
                1. -1
                  9 August 2022 14: 05
                  Only in your inflamed imagination. START-3 is not in the past. START-4 is most likely to happen if START-3 is not extended.

                  I will not comment on the orbit, it makes no sense. Treat your head.
          2. -1
            9 August 2022 12: 46
            What about the tests in the States ... oh yes, they didn’t do them so as not to irritate China, before that they didn’t irritate us ... laughing
            1. -1
              9 August 2022 12: 52
              With what tests?
              1. -1
                9 August 2022 15: 15
                Like with some, yes with Minuteman ...
                1. -1
                  9 August 2022 15: 22
                  All of them are held regularly.
                  1. -1
                    9 August 2022 16: 09
                    Yes? It's strange, but the Americans do not agree with you ...
          3. +1
            9 August 2022 14: 49
            The warhead in this situation is nothing, the main engine. And he ... it!
      3. +8
        8 August 2022 21: 06
        The move is correct ..... I wonder what the consequences will be? Who will be in the plus and who will be in the minus?
        EVERYONE will be at a loss. And the further, the more the world is sliding into the abyss of nuclear war. After all, it can easily start "suddenly", as soon as the Anglo-Saxons consider that the benefit from the destruction of the world will outweigh the current financial benefit. And they sit out and start again.
        1. +4
          8 August 2022 21: 34
          Quote: AKuzenka
          The move is correct ..... I wonder what the consequences will be? Who will be in the plus and who will be in the minus?
          EVERYONE will be at a loss. And the further, the more the world is sliding into the abyss of nuclear war. After all, it can easily start "suddenly", as soon as the Anglo-Saxons consider that the benefit from the destruction of the world will outweigh the current financial benefit. And they sit out and start again.

          Yes, they won’t sit out behind the puddles, no one will sit out, except perhaps the Australians, I don’t remember from geography how the winds go over them.
          If it starts in full, then it’s not worth saving anyone or anything from the “partners” -
          even categorically FOR striking with "dirty" charges on US coasts!
          1. +1
            9 August 2022 07: 20
            Quote: Starover_Z
            no one will sit out, except perhaps the Australians, I don’t remember from geography how the winds go over them.


            There, it seems, they blow from west to east, at least this is how sailing shipping was organized in the "roaring forties", I can be mistaken.

            China is unlikely to leave the Australians alone, especially since there will be Yusov ships.
            *
            I think the possible scenario is different.
            First, there will be a British island as a warning, the Pentagon will estimate the effect of the number of loaves spent by us and the possibility of intercepting them, after which they will offer to negotiate.

            Alternatively, the main US bases in the world can be demolished.

            But Kedmi likes to repeat that there will be no strikes on cities, the primary goal is nuclear mines, launchers and storage facilities for nuclear weapons.
            Based on the results, the parties decide whether they need to continue.


            1. 0
              9 August 2022 08: 55
              there will be no strikes on cities, the primary goal is nuclear mines, launchers and storage facilities for nuclear weapons.
              Based on the results, the parties decide whether they need to continue.

              I think no one will sit and launch one rocket at a time.
              1. 0
                9 August 2022 12: 49
                Quote: glory1974
                I think no one will sit and launch one rocket at a time.

                recourse and we are already running BZHDRK "Barguzin"? Or is what we have and what they don't have enough? wink
            2. +1
              9 August 2022 09: 26
              But Kedmi likes to repeat that there will be no strikes on cities, the primary goal is nuclear mines, launchers and storage facilities for nuclear weapons.
              Based on the results, the parties decide whether they need to continue.
              He's just a TV analyst. The headquarters, most likely, have completely different plans.
          2. -1
            9 August 2022 09: 24
            Yes, they won’t sit out behind the puddles, no one will sit out, except perhaps the Australians, I don’t remember from geography how the winds go over them.
            They sit out allegorically. Some of them will definitely survive, they can't help but calculate this. And depending on the preserved infrastructure and resources, the enslavement of the remnants of civilization will begin. Here's what I wanted to say. After all, you can't call them idiots.
        2. +1
          8 August 2022 23: 07
          The USSR and the USA did not have such an agreement. In terms of the number of charges, we surpassed the enemy, almost twice. I doubt that under these conditions, someone could calculate the benefits and the opportunity to sit out behind a puddle. There was no need to reduce arsenals so much that stupid thoughts would not visit smart heads.
        3. +1
          9 August 2022 07: 03
          Anglam has nowhere to run from his island. And it’s useful to scare all this riff-raff, they have completely lost their fear lately.
          1. 0
            9 August 2022 09: 27
            Anglam has nowhere to run from his island. And it’s useful to scare all this riff-raff, they have completely lost their fear lately.
            They have the whole of Canada, Australia, South Africa, not counting the rest of the small countries of the British Commonwealth.
        4. -1
          9 August 2022 08: 02
          The Anglo-Saxons collectively have more deployed BBs. And if you count France there, then even more.
        5. 0
          9 August 2022 14: 52
          Wait! Pins in the tail. Otherwise, they wouldn't have fidgeted so much. Control over them is like intelligence, but do we need it? winked Let the cattle bases crawl and sweat!
      4. +2
        8 August 2022 21: 15
        Quote: SaLaR
        Who will be in the plus and who will be in the minus?

        Everything is very simple here. Win with Ipon by mister Putin and, of course, the Strategic Missile Forces. The Yankees are postponing their Minuteman test for the second time, so as not to anger Our southeastern neighbor. We have a green light for all trials, while a potential adversary has a red light. Need to be stuck in traffic
        1. 0
          9 August 2022 12: 49
          Do you believe in it? They just made up an excuse for launch failures.
      5. +12
        8 August 2022 21: 43
        Quote: SaLaR
        The move is correct ..... I wonder what the consequences will be?
        Yes, in fact, no, because everyone will remain in their own interests. Well, what were the consequences after the mattresses withdrew from the open skies treaty? None, except that both we and the Europeans were sent in three letters. remaining within the framework of the contract, they would leak all the information to the mattresses, and we would not have any information on their movement. Now openness has sunk into oblivion, and everything hangs on exploration.
        Quote: SaLaR
        Who will be in the plus and who will be in the minus?

        Everything is in the red, but these are costs from the category of loss of bilateral trust, which was not particularly there before due to the fact that the mattresses abused our willingness to play fair. Now the shop is closed, and either there will be a new agreement, taking into account mutual interests, or there will be none. The one-sided game is over. hi
      6. +5
        9 August 2022 04: 45
        Yes, this is not interesting! And why is it done with such a margin from them! If they forbade us yesterday, why are ours waiting for months?
        1. +1
          9 August 2022 07: 34
          Because they are soplezhui and traders. They complain all the time and go around worried.
        2. 0
          9 August 2022 08: 03
          You ask uncomfortable questions (at such a time)! Ask again how it happened that they managed to pull a trillion out of our pocket. laughing
      7. 0
        9 August 2022 17: 04
        It is not clear why the minuses were thrown. The question is not for you specifically, but for everyone. How it works?
    2. +3
      8 August 2022 20: 44
      If the American inspection mission is still in Russia - they are subject to immediate arrest as a black panther Greiner, the reason is the same - they are all on drugs, they even smoke in the mines on the database!
      1. +8
        8 August 2022 21: 00
        It is not here yet, but the United States wants it to be, and ours so that it does not exist on their territory. The US special flight did not fly to Russia.
        1. +4
          8 August 2022 21: 26
          Quote: tralflot1832
          It is not here yet, but the United States wants it to be, and ours so that it does not exist on their territory. The US special flight did not fly to Russia.

          Against the backdrop of such American hotelok, DO NOT LET ANYONE IN!
          Neither to Russia, nor through Russia from the States!
          1. 0
            9 August 2022 07: 40
            Let everyone in! And release in exchange for Bout, Yakovenko and other people of ours that they have in prisons.
    3. +3
      9 August 2022 00: 43
      Quote: Captive
      Correct move

      The move is correct, but the spoon is expensive for dinner. It is necessary to mirror in the shortest possible time, and ours are still measured by goodwill.
    4. -1
      9 August 2022 08: 01
      The right move.


      Just so long ago, it feels like only Estonians are sitting in the government. laughing
    5. 0
      9 August 2022 14: 17
      and even before handing over the notice of the ban on visiting, I would have handed a two to a tambourine, thrown it on the first plane to Fashington and with a paternal 3.13 star on the dupe, I would have sent it home, I hope some ensign or sergeant will do that
  2. +5
    8 August 2022 20: 25
    Moscow stressed that the solution is temporary, and as soon as the United States "solves all the problems" associated with the normal work of the inspection commissions, Russia will remove all the restrictions imposed.

    In the UWB, the problem with the heads of officials needs to be solved! And this will never happen! So goodbye!)
    1. +8
      8 August 2022 20: 41
      Quote: Sergio_7
      In the UWB, the problem with the heads of officials needs to be solved!

      Yes, they have their heads, everything is in order, this is a strategy and tactics for decades. The fool is always easier to play.
    2. +2
      8 August 2022 21: 08
      In the UWB, the problem with the heads of officials needs to be solved! And this will never happen! So goodbye!)
      Officials are nowhere and do not decide anything. The oligarchy sends them ready-made solutions. There is 100% corruption there. What can be the decisions of officials?!!!
  3. +8
    8 August 2022 20: 28
    That's right, don't carry dirt on objects, then clean up after them. But seriously, everything should be proportional - as you are to us, so we are to you. Moreover, the Sarmatians are on combat duty and there is nothing to look at them.
  4. +5
    8 August 2022 20: 30
    In the American parallel world, tonight there will be diarrhea of ​​​​thoughts. I'm talking about Jean Pierre. China set the bandwagon with the climate, we are START 3. Remove the button from sleeping Joe, urgently. bully
    1. +2
      8 August 2022 20: 42
      Quote: tralflot1832
      I'm talking about Jean Pierre. China set the bandwagon with the climate, we are START 3. Remove the button from the sleeping Joe, urgently.

    2. +2
      9 August 2022 07: 08
      Joe constantly presses this button, but the suitcase he was given is not the one that his predecessors had: instead of launching rockets, orderlies come running with another dose of sedatives.
  5. -1
    8 August 2022 20: 31
    The stakes are rising...
    1. +1
      8 August 2022 20: 51
      Quote: Adrey
      The stakes are rising...

      So energy sources are less, but more expensive. Even prostitutes have become twice as expensive, and you are talking about rates.
  6. -3
    8 August 2022 20: 32
    The very extension of the START-3 treaty is a serious mistake. The main interests of this extension are people sitting in the USA on a huge salary and allegedly monitoring its observance.
    1. +2
      8 August 2022 20: 53
      Quote: certero
      The very extension of the START-3 treaty is a serious mistake.

      No, it was a temporary delay of the Third World War. And now she's hovering around.
    2. -2
      9 August 2022 12: 29
      Well, of course. We have more resources than the West as a whole. Human, financial, technological, yeah.
  7. +4
    8 August 2022 20: 33
    No inspections!
    First, an inspection of Joe Biden's sanity.
    With a doctor explaining that he has insanity! wink
    1. +4
      8 August 2022 21: 25
      Quote: Paul Siebert
      With a doctor explaining that he has insanity!

      If the West is rotting, then there is no need to hint at it. Can be cured on our head
  8. +2
    8 August 2022 20: 38
    all Washington's actions indicate the opposite, the Americans want to get a lot, but at the same time give almost nothing.

    Like Washington, like London, they always want to get a lot, but give nothing in return. Pirates of the 18th century are no different from pirates of the 21st century.
  9. +3
    8 August 2022 20: 43
    It's ONLY NOW that such a measure has been introduced, and then, temporarily ??? After all ... bullshit from the Americans ??? Estonians are resting!...
    1. +3
      8 August 2022 20: 49
      Have you been informed about mutual inspections? This mutaten has been going on since the signing of the agreement.
  10. -7
    8 August 2022 20: 49
    I'm shocked ... It turns out that all this time, during the NWO, we let the Americans into military facilities, they just walked around them all over the country ... At the same time, they did not let us into their own. In general, in our country, the authorities have gone crazy or what?
    1. +4
      8 August 2022 21: 02
      And where did you get that they were here.
  11. +3
    8 August 2022 21: 04
    When was the last time they inspected us? And we them? And there are too many misunderstandings.
  12. -1
    8 August 2022 21: 33
    Why do we always say "O"? Why don't we finally say - would YOU fuck?
  13. -7
    8 August 2022 21: 36
    What does temporarily mean? How long will we be humiliated?
  14. +1
    8 August 2022 21: 41
    It is interesting that now the Americans will howl about the fact that Russia, unable to negotiate, continues to spin tensions.
  15. +12
    8 August 2022 21: 51
    no treaty with the US is viable.
  16. +6
    8 August 2022 22: 04
    Half measure. It is high time to close all information about the strategic nuclear forces and send the United States in the ass. The maximum is a line for emergency communication, to exclude accidents and provocations.
  17. GNM
    +2
    8 August 2022 22: 23
    Mutual control is needed more by the lagging side, but not by us.
    Moscow stressed that the solution is temporary, and as soon as the United States "solves all the problems" associated with the normal work of the inspection commissions, Russia will remove all the restrictions imposed.
    And this is about the same as with turbines that do not want to be repaired properly.
  18. +2
    8 August 2022 22: 30
    We ourselves arm our opponent and give him the right to control us. The ban on inspections should have been introduced no later than a week after the blocking of our inspections, and the export of enriched uranium should be subject to sanctions, as it is a strategic resource with the possibility of military use. And we also laugh with the Estonians, but our "effective" leaders slow down even worse than the Estonians. With such their talents, it is only good to drink vodka with them. negative
    1. +2
      9 August 2022 05: 47
      Quote: Horon
      With such their talents, it’s only good to drink vodka with them
      nah ... if you send someone for vodka, you will be left without a bottle and money.
      1. 0
        9 August 2022 10: 59
        On the other hand, you won’t get drunk, otherwise, while they are only pouring, it will be possible to start the second box already. laughing
  19. -2
    8 August 2022 22: 44
    And what were you waiting for six months?
    Didn't it dissolve on its own?
    Could it?
  20. -1
    8 August 2022 22: 45
    well done! their own answer) leaving the START - "we are not interested, the rest is your problem!"
    time to catch rocks
  21. 0
    8 August 2022 22: 45
    Better later than never. There is nothing more permanent than temporary.
  22. +2
    8 August 2022 22: 57
    Correctly! They don't need to know that we have a Barracuda and a Cayman. And in general, it's time to put these Scotts and Pedro in their place. Do they want to smell Poseidons and Sarmatians?
  23. -2
    8 August 2022 23: 15
    Are we still heavily dependent on the US? And they do not depend on us. All contracts on the side. There is an idea - to test nuclear weapons. Series.
  24. 0
    8 August 2022 23: 55
    Yes, we should have done this with them a long time ago, and not show respect for the decisions taken jointly with the United States on mutual inspection of objects in the countries.
  25. +1
    9 August 2022 01: 20
    Eye for an eye...
  26. 0
    9 August 2022 01: 34
    Russia informed the United States of its decision to temporarily stop the admission of foreign inspectors to its facilities under the New START.
    Temporary... . Oh well. You can't be a little pregnant .... clowns ... . lol
  27. 0
    9 August 2022 01: 46
    Quote: Vorchunov
    Correctly! They don't need to know that we have a Barracuda and a Cayman. And in general, it's time to put these Scotts and Pedro in their place. Do they want to smell Poseidons and Sarmatians?

    Come on, come on, bro! You never know in Brazil dons Pedro, as well as wild monkeys! You can apparently press the button - send "Sarmat", release "Poseidon" ... drink beer, or something else .... Where are you anyway?! Where are these passages from? From Frunzenskaya? Or from Vlasikha? I won’t ask further, as I understand it, from the nearest pub near your house! sad
  28. 0
    9 August 2022 03: 55
    Europe and the United States launched a hybrid war against Russia, the United States ended all wars so that Russia could not strike back.
    All these bans on visiting objects are childish pranks. The best thing Russia can do now is unleash a hybrid war on its own terms.
    First of all, it is gas, but if Russia simply cuts off supplies, then we are depriving ourselves of profits. It is necessary to destroy the European gas pipe. The gas pipeline from Norway goes to the UK and Europe through neutral waters. You just need to make a diversion. It will be a hybrid gas war. And most importantly, it will be difficult for Europe to answer. Europe and the US are playing by their own rules, it's time to change that...
  29. -1
    9 August 2022 06: 15
    Meow meow. Well, what?
  30. 0
    9 August 2022 08: 18
    Love should be mutual, and so some kind of rape, when they mature, you are welcome, we will love ...
  31. -1
    9 August 2022 12: 19
    One question - why is it done only now?
    1. +1
      9 August 2022 12: 57
      And Schaub VO regulars had a reason to scratch their tongues ...
  32. 0
    9 August 2022 12: 43
    Inspectors in the harsh time of the war - a kick in the ass! What kind of treaty after what the West arranged for Russia?! What do these "partners" do with the contracts? This is how we need to act, so that we would tremble, remembering the 22nd year ...