Kornilov revolt of the year 1917: unsuccessful right turn attempt

58
In the chaotic kaleidoscope of events in Russia that followed the February Revolution, the mutiny of General L. G. Kornilov stands out. Historians still break spears: what assessment is valid for the August 1917 events of the year? How would events develop in Russia, if Kornilov’s performance was successful?

It seems that the reflections around these events will be conducted for a long time ...

Lavr Kornilov takes a show 1917 year


The atmosphere in Petrograd has been hectic since the spring of 17. In an atmosphere of complete impasse, which by this time was the army (already practically not fighting and standing on the verge of complete decomposition), most people in army circles saw the only way out of the current situation to introduce military dictatorship.

The idea of ​​a “strong hand” of vital also in the circles of a significant part of the former tsarist bureaucracy, which connected with the new change of power hopes of returning to public service.

Even in the Provisional Government itself, there were moderate revolutionaries (mostly from among the “Cadets”) who were disappointed in the endless stream of slogans and exhortations at rallies, and also saw salvation in establishing a dictatorship.

The ministers of the Provisional Government and A. F. Kerensky himself were very apprehensive about the exaggerated threat of the Bolshevik uprising at that time. Kerensky, after the July Bolshevik speech, attempted to disband and remove regiments infected with Bolshevik propaganda from the city (the Soldier’s section of the Petrograd Soviet, however, refused to make this decision valid).

Kerensky, realizing that he was losing control over the current situation, also decided to rely on the army and replaces the “socialist and republican” Brusilov Kornilov as the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the army.

The identity of Kornilov became known in Russia after the events of the 1916 year, when he managed to escape from the Austrian captivity. 2 March 1917 Kornilov on behalf of the Chief of General Staff General Mikhnevich byd was appointed by Nicholas II Commander of the Petrograd Military District.

Lavr Kornilov was a supporter of the most stringent measures in the establishment of order. Among his demands were: the introduction of the death penalty in the rear and at the front, the complete subordination of the transport industry to the high command, engaging the work of industry exclusively for front-line needs and abstraction of political leadership from military affairs.

A separate point of Lavr Georgievich’s program was the “unloading” of Petrograd from undesirable and harmful military elements. It was planned, with the help of front-line units that retained their combat readiness, to disarm the Petrograd garrison and bring the revolutionary troops to the front. The Kronstadt garrison at the same time was subject to complete liquidation, as the main center of revolutionary sentiment. Petrograd itself was supposed to be transferred to martial law.

The plans for the "unloading" of Petrograd are already showing disagreement for political purposes, which its organizers set themselves. A.F. Kerensky was preparing the ground for getting rid of the influence of the Soviets and for concentrating individual power in his own hands. The military generals (generally opposition to the Provisional Government) relied on military dictatorship.



Kornilov himself, who feels like an electrified atmosphere, fueled by ordinary people tired of chaos and disorder, as if he believed at that moment in his exclusivity and the privacy of what he should be at the head of the country.

Despite the fact that Kornilov was considered a bad politician even in his inner circle, Lavr Georgievich developed an entire political program before the rebellion. It included many points: restoring the disciplinary right of commanders in the army and navy, the removal of the commissars of the Provisional Government from interfering in the actions of officers, restricting the rights of soldiers' committees, banning rallies in the army and strikes at defense plants, In addition, Kornilov proposed to transfer to martial law the entire railway system, industry that worked for front-line needs, and the law about the sweeping execution to extend to the rear.

The political part of the Kornilov program included the abolition of the Soviets in the rear and at the front, the prohibition of the activities of trade union committees in factories, the introduction of censorship into the army press. The supreme power was to pass to the Council of National Defense, which would include Kornilov himself, Kerensky, A. V. Kolchak, B. V. Savinkov, and others.

The All-Russian Constituent Assembly was supposed to be convened either after the end of the war, or to convene it and dissolve in case of disagreement with the decisions adopted by the top military dictators.

General L. G. Kornilov and B. V. Savinkov


Conceiving his speech in Petrograd, Lavr Kornilov was counting on the support of organizations such as the Union of Officers, the Military League, and the leadership of these organizations Kornilov was proposed a plan for an attack on Petrograd. Under the justification that 27 August, in honor of the half year after the overthrow of the royal power, leftist forces will begin demonstrations in the capital, which then turn into riots in order to seize power, Kornilov (legally, in coordination with Kerensky) began to transfer military units to the capital. It was the division of General A. Krymov's 3 Cavalry Corps and the Indigenous (informally called "Wild", consisting of Caucasian cavalry soldiers), Lieutenant-General D. P. Bagration. In addition, the cavalry corps of Major General A. N. Dolgorukov was moving from Petrograd from the north from Finland to Petrograd.

On August 25, units loyal to Kornilov were advanced to Petrograd, counting on everything else on the support of officers loyal to him who had previously left for the city, who had collaborated with the Union of Officers, the Military League and other organizations. At the same time, Kornilov also counted on the support of the Government, considering petty disagreements with Prime Minister Kerensky to be insignificant in their common goal: the exercise of dictatorial power in Russia.

Alexander Kerensky, however, as it turned out, had his own point of view on the developing events. Sensing that something serious is being planned, he refuses the Cadets' demand to “surrender power” and goes on the attack, signing the decree on 27 in August to remove L. G. Kornilov from the post of Commander in Chief and declare him a rebel. Kerensky dismisses the cabinet, appropriates "dictatorial powers" and declares himself the Supreme Commander. Kerensky refused any negotiations with Kornilov.

At that moment, Kornilov was already in a losing position: by the actions of the Belarusian Soviets, the military headquarters (located in Mogilev) was cut off from the front-line territories, army soldiers' committees of the armies of the South-Western front arrested their commanders, and A. I. Denikin was arrested . Other supporters of Kornilov were also isolated at the front, in other Russian cities (General Krymov, who realized the futility of rebel actions, shot himself 31 August). Lavr Kornilov himself was arrested on September 2.
After the failure of the Kornilov revolt, Alexander Kerensky proclaimed Russia a republic, power passed to the Directory consisting of five people headed by him.

Thus, it can be said that Kerensky, in his striving for balancing between the left forces that prevailed in the Soviets and the army circles holding to the right hard positions, at a certain moment (actually threatening his powerful ambitions) chose the first. As a result, the political influence of the Soviets has increased in the country, and as a result, the Bolsheviks.

Generals, prisoners of Bykhov prison in the fall of 1917. By numbers: 1. L. G. Kornilov. 2. A. I. Denikin. 3. G.M. Vannovsky. 4. I. G. Erdelyi. 5. E. F. Elsner. 6. A. S. Lukomsky. 7. V.N. Kislyakov. 8. I. P. Romanovsky. 9. S.L. Markov. 10. M. I. Orlov. 11. L.N. Novosiltsev. 12. V.M. Pronin. 13. I. G. Sots. 14. S.N. Ryasnyansky. 15. V. Ye. Rozhenko. 16. A.P. Bragin. 17. I. A. Rodionov. 18. G. L. Chunikhin. 19. V.V. Kletsand. 20. S.F. Nikitin. Autumn 1917 of the year
The case of General Kornilov

58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    13 October 2012 08: 38
    Lavra Kornilov comes from the poorest Kalmyk family, rose to the rank of general. Honest man, patriot.
    Eternal memory to him!
    1. Lech e-mine
      +1
      13 October 2012 08: 52
      The officers of those years were the elite of the Russian army. Lavr Georgievich was a brilliant officer but unfortunately a weak politician. The Bolsheviks outplayed him by promising the people PEACE to the soldiers, EARTH to the peasants, PLANTS workers. These slogans worked - which, however, did not mean that the people received all this.
      1. +1
        13 October 2012 12: 17
        That is, there was no peace of Brest, the land was not handed over to the peasants (the question immediately - what explains the support of the Bolshevik people?), And certainly the workers continued to work for the capitalist gentlemen? wink
        ... How would events develop in Russia if Kornilov’s performance were successful? ...
        If my grandmother had something, then she would be a grandfather)))
        History does not know the subjunctive mood.
    2. 0
      13 October 2012 12: 30
      meaningless set of words - ignorance stories are awesome
      1. +2
        13 October 2012 13: 09
        aleks,
        so tell us how it really was Yes ...
        lead me out of the terrible darkness of ignorance, under the sun of KNOWLEDGE of history ...
        1. Oles
          0
          13 October 2012 20: 42
          and what to tell, Carlson? and so everything is clear. an attempt to turn "to the right". sorry failed (((
          1. Zynaps
            -1
            14 October 2012 01: 02
            and why would she succeed? in the crumbling Empire, Nikolashka alone represented at least some kind of power, for the heir, the anointed of God, this and that. country during WWI was pushed into a deep ass. the collapse of power, in the cities of famine, factories are standing, the peasants themselves begin to divide the land and let the red rooster to the landlords. and SUDDENLY General. without a coherent program, a rebel and (in the understanding of the population) another world eater. and even mediocrely missed power "temporary". and this most honest man skidded to the Don to gather an army and kindle the Civil War even before the arrival of the Bolsheviks.

            it remains to explain why this worthy general, together with the "democrat" Alekseev, completely refused to support the Don and Kuban people. not even the division was scraped together. authority, yes.
            1. Yoshkin Kot
              0
              14 October 2012 10: 44
              who is "nikolashka"? your ..k?
            2. Oles
              +2
              14 October 2012 15: 05
              zynaps, do not push bullshit. in Russia there was the second salary of workers in the world. after shsha. by the 17th year, the only country among the belligerents that had not introduced a card system for distributing food. few? I think enough. it was a fat riot. in February((
            3. stroporez
              0
              14 October 2012 23: 21
              minus you. he is not anointed ....... the last person over whom the sacrament of anointing was performed on the kingdom was petr lekseich, after him --- not a single one. so sho nicholas --- and not a king like ....... ......
          2. -3
            14 October 2012 03: 44
            Quote: Oles
            . sorry failed (((

            THESE, MUCH MISSIONS, THE OLD WORLD - there was not a single chance!
          3. -4
            14 October 2012 06: 44
            Quote: Oles
            and what to tell, Carlson

            when I say - everyone - shut up.
            1. Yoshkin Kot
              -1
              14 October 2012 10: 44
              Manka tortured?
            2. Oles
              0
              14 October 2012 15: 20
              you are very pontus starley. and you go down to minus)) "everyone is silent" if I were in the author, I would tell you))

              with the word a little wrong. not in the author but in the author
        2. Zynaps
          -2
          14 October 2012 01: 04
          right now, wait, whitewaters loot rob robbed for their idol they will begin to curl up and tear their own points on the British flag. poop will fly - get in your life!
    3. +1
      13 October 2012 16: 51
      actually his mother was a Kazakh father, a Cossack, they lived in my opinion in the current Semipalatinsk region
    4. 0
      13 October 2012 17: 31
      from the poorest Kalmyk family


      Where is that written? Kalmyk is Kalmyk, but the Cossack is
      1. Yoshkin Kot
        +1
        14 October 2012 10: 45
        Kalmyk was his mother
    5. Oles
      +1
      13 October 2012 20: 47
      noblest man ... eternal memory ... and glory
      1. -5
        14 October 2012 06: 37
        sorry I didn’t put a knife in his throat.
    6. Zynaps
      0
      14 October 2012 00: 55
      an honest man and a patriot - and SUDDENLY at the head of a general conspiracy against Beloved Mr. Pege, to whom he took the oath and from whose hands he took all laurels, honors and titles?

      for some Latin American junta, such a "decent" person will do just fine.
      1. Oles
        -1
        14 October 2012 15: 01
        Peje’s hands were rotten. and to whom did he take the oath? Is it not Keren? Mother Russia ... the patriot was Kornilov ... the hero of Russia
    7. Yoshkin Kot
      0
      14 October 2012 10: 43
      not Kalmyk and not the poorest, there were no poor Cossacks
  2. +2
    13 October 2012 09: 25
    Lavr Georgievich is not a Kalmyk.
    1. Oles
      0
      13 October 2012 12: 34
      Kazakh. half
    2. +2
      13 October 2012 17: 32
      A Kalmyk is not a Kalmyk; first of all, he belonged to the Cossack class. This is the first, that he had the opportunity to study, confirms that the family was not starving. This is the second. And then we all first of all like to put the brand "Cinderella" in order to squeeze a tear more conveniently later
  3. Ares1
    +2
    13 October 2012 12: 18
    I don’t know where the author’s data about Kalmyk roots came from (not from Wikipedia for an hour?), But Nikolai Kuzmin’s book "General Kornilov" (Voenizdat, 1997) contains a clear description of L.G. Kornilov. So. From the family of a service Cossack from the Gorkovskaya line (settlements of the Siberian Cossacks, built since the times of Peter the Great along the entire Irtysh river). My father served in the Cossacks for 25 years and retired as a cornet. Mother from a Kazakh nomadic family from the left bank of the Irtysh. The maternal cut of Kornilov's eyes more than once helped him (the young officer) in intelligence in an illegal position. On the other hand, it doesn't matter whether it's a Kalmyk or some other steppe. Russian combat officer! And he died as well, as befits a military officer - he died a heroic death on the battlefield. The shell hit the headquarters. You can imagine how he fought with the Bolsheviks and how annoyed them that when the red units entered Yekaterinodar left by the whites and the soldiers of the Bolshevik Temryuk regiment began to look for the "treasures" of the cadets in fresh graves, they were attracted by a corpse in a uniform with gold shoulder straps - they recognized L.G. Kornilov ... Further from the horror film - stripped the corpse and tied naked behind a horse and dragged the corpse around the city for 3 days ... And then dragged it to the city massacre and burned it ... The civil war is truly terrible.

    By the way, the situation Kerensky-Kornilov found its analogue somewhat later - Khrushchev-Zhukov. Another confirmation of the spiral of history ...
    1. -1
      13 October 2012 13: 22
      Ares1 hi ,
      What's the difference! )))
      Before the revolution, he was a Russian officer, after the bourgeois ousted the tsar, he became one of a whole galaxy of ambitious bourgeois figures rushing to power, and they could not even agree with each other, but what would happen after their victory and taking a place they didn’t think about the mountain king, respectively, they didn’t have a clear political position, their goals weren’t understood by the people, and after the beginning of their cooperation with the invaders, they all by definition became enemies of the people and as a logical result were doomed to defeat soldier .
      Quote: Ares1
      One can imagine how he fought with the Bolsheviks and how he annoyed them

      It is believed that there was something ...
      Lazo in a firebox, also not for beautiful eyes thrust alive.

      Quote: Ares1
      Truly terrible civil war.

      I absolutely agree, the worst war is civil ...
      1. Ares1
        0
        13 October 2012 15: 31
        The fact is that not everything is so simple ... Regarding the bourgeois figures. The fact is that when the king abdicated, the mass of officers faced a choice - who should serve? To whom did they swear? So after all, he himself denied the oath ... Who is the legitimate (or less) government? Temporary. He began to swear. Later time put in its place. And General Alekseev, accepting the abdication of the king, became at the birth of Dobrarmi ...
        1. 0
          13 October 2012 15: 35
          Quote: Ares1
          The fact is that when the king abdicated

          Did he voluntarily disown? Tipo: well, all of you on a swing, I’ll go to Livadia to live my life, to the country house.
          1. Ares1
            0
            13 October 2012 15: 57
            Do you think that he was tortured? Or was his family hostage? Or was he captured by the war-winning side? The fact of the matter is that no. Renunciation was voluntary. You probably read the text. Russia was losing the war by then? No. There was no reason for voluntary abdication. I had to deal with all the problems. But Nicholas III, unfortunately, is not Alexander III ...
            1. 0
              13 October 2012 16: 45
              Quote: Ares1
              Do you think that he was tortured?

              No, they didn’t torture us, they blocked us so cleanly for the pro forma and controlled that.

              Quote: Ares1
              Or was his family hostage?

              where was Nikolai’s family at that moment when the team led by Alekseev gently hinted to the first one to say, move dad, your age has passed; were safety guarantees mentioned to the family of Nicholas just before the abdication?
              I absolutely agree that Nicholas did not match the role of the leader of Russia, but the fact that the renunciation was voluntary let me disagree, but you probably read the circumstances of the renunciation.
              1. Yoshkin Kot
                -1
                14 October 2012 10: 50
                Jews blank and Bronstein, apparently more suited?
            2. Zynaps
              0
              14 October 2012 01: 24
              Quote: Ares1
              Renunciation was voluntary.


              and if he had not renounced voluntarily, they would have helped. like Emperor Paul, a snuffbox in the temple. but cho, experience imeezzo.
              1. -1
                14 October 2012 03: 46
                Quote: Zynaps
                would help

                here the bourgeois experience is more than ours — Bolshevik.
                1. Ares1
                  0
                  14 October 2012 07: 11
                  Bolshevik or monarchist - would you have decided?
                2. Yoshkin Kot
                  -2
                  14 October 2012 10: 50
                  who are you my friend? Jew?
              2. Ares1
                0
                14 October 2012 07: 00
                Quote: Zynaps
                and if he had not renounced voluntarily, they would have helped. like emperor paul
                In my opinion, someone at the beginning of the discussion wrote about the subjunctive mood)))
        2. Yoshkin Kot
          -2
          14 October 2012 10: 49
          The king did not abdicate; he was forced to do so by threatening his family
          1. Oles
            -1
            14 October 2012 15: 30
            critters (((the war was going on ... where was there to be ...? it’s not a civilian thing to start ... but it was necessary to take ...? Peter to take. to put the revolutionaries in cancer.
      2. Yoshkin Kot
        -2
        14 October 2012 10: 48
        kaneshno, kaneshno, another supporter of the genocide of the Russian people appeared, supporters of Russophobia, Marx, Engels, blank, Bronstein
    2. +2
      13 October 2012 15: 30
      Quote: Ares1
      Father served in the Cossacks for 25 years and retired coronets. Mother from the Kazakh nomadic family from the left bank of the Irtysh

      Business as usual for the Cossacks. They were resettled to the east single, married locals. Children of the Cossacks-Cossacks. The wife's nationality did not matter. It has always been this way, for centuries. That is why they said: "We are not Russians, we are Cossacks." My great-grandmother, by the way, was a Kalmyk woman.
      1. Ares1
        0
        13 October 2012 15: 51
        Yes, and who is arguing? That is exactly what I said. This is the nationality of the Jews by mother ...
        1. 0
          14 October 2012 06: 46
          someone divides people by nationality, I'll give you in the face - out of generosity of soul!
          1. Ares1
            0
            14 October 2012 07: 08
            Quote: Karlsonn
            someone divides people by nationality, I'll give you in the face - from the bounty of the soul
            my friend, be careful - the Jew is not a nationality. As for the muzzle - it is better to look in the mirror. And as for the give - try ... You can give when they take it. You. Behind
      2. Oles
        0
        14 October 2012 15: 25
        Centurion, and you are not Pankrat an hour?)) From the Kuban mozhe?))
    3. Zynaps
      0
      14 October 2012 01: 18
      tell me, expert, why did more former tsarist officers fight in the Red Army than the White Guards? and why did this honest officer lead a coup against his sovereign, whom he swore, and so on?

      Quote: Ares1
      and the soldiers of the Bolshevik Temryuk regiment began to search for the "treasures" of the Cadets in fresh graves


      yes, poor Kornilov. where are there hundreds of hanged trees and pillars in Rostov and Maykop after being captured by whites (or else I will find a description of how the Russian city of Oryol was given for three days to stream and plundered by Russian General Denikin - what the White Guards observed sacredly - and what came of it ) people couldn’t get through so that they wouldn’t come across a hanged man. until the local authority of the Russian Orthodox Church prayerfully asked to be removed on the eve of the temple festival.

      Quote: Ares1
      By the way, the situation Kerensky-Kornilov found its analogue somewhat later - Khrushchev-Zhukov. Another confirmation of the spiral of history ...


      impotent from the authorities and the conspirator equated the head of a superpower (albeit a balamut) and the Marshal of Victory. you still didn’t find more analogies?
      1. -2
        14 October 2012 03: 48
        Quote: Zynaps
        tell me, expert, why did more former tsarist officers fight in the Red Army than the White Guards?

        I'm just yelling !!!
        I constantly ask this question to lovers of crunch of French bread - how did it happen that more than half of the officer corps of tsarist Russia fought on the side of the Bolsheviks?
        1. Ares1
          0
          14 October 2012 07: 21
          Where does the data come from? More than half ... Why not 3/4?
        2. Yoshkin Kot
          -1
          14 October 2012 14: 41
          bullshit! have you heard of the hostage system?
          1. Oles
            0
            14 October 2012 15: 14
            yes cat. fully used ((
        3. Oles
          0
          14 October 2012 14: 57
          how did it happen I will explain to a little one. terror ... hostages of wife-children. available?
      2. Ares1
        +3
        14 October 2012 07: 28
        This is who led the conspiracy against the king? Kornilov !?
        Further. I do not deny the atrocities of the white parts. I am surprised at this. And I regard the civil war as the greatest calamity and insanity of the people. Not white or red. And the people.
        And in history, as a science, there is no place for epithets. There are parallels.
      3. Oles
        -5
        14 October 2012 15: 35
        "marshal of victory" -)) beetles are a freak, real marshals of victory are simple Russian soldiers
    4. Yoshkin Kot
      -4
      14 October 2012 10: 47
      and what do you want from bolshevichnyh, upright creatures?
  4. +1
    13 October 2012 14: 50
    Kalmyk, Kazakh, Russian, Lavr Georgievich Kornilov was a Cossack!
    A brave officer, an honest man, a true patriot!
    Everyone interprets the events of that time today, depending on their political views and worldview.
    They say, time puts everything in its place not sure at all times people will be different from each other and in their own way interpret the story!
    1. 0
      13 October 2012 15: 15
      Quote: omsbon
      fair man

      Dear, are you aware of the conditions of detention of officers of the Russian army in captivity? If you know why do you write nonsense?
      If not, then read, you will discover a lot of interesting things hi .
      1. +1
        13 October 2012 16: 58
        Well, in war, an honest word given to the enemy would not have much significance then, and there wouldn’t have been scouts;
        1. 0
          13 October 2012 17: 48
          Quote: Tambourine 2012
          in war, the word of honor given to the enemy of special significance

          very comfortable conditions of captivity, free access to the nearest city, for example, were determined by the then realities and the officer’s word didn’t cost something, though not for everyone - for example, Kornilov believed that the word of a Russian officer was worth nothing.
          1. Zynaps
            +1
            14 October 2012 02: 15
            so, after all, an honest man Kornilov gave his true word to any cattle.

            True, much earlier he gave the king the word.

            as there: once - not in the ass as. but what to do when two times?
            1. 0
              14 October 2012 03: 51
              I eat my hand drinks
              the only thing I regret is the poor face control in the General Staff crying
              at the end of the century before last, the General Staff of Russia was a cesspool of traitors!
    2. 0
      13 October 2012 15: 45
      Quote: omsbon
      Kalmyk, Kazakh, Russian, Lavr Georgievich Kornilov was a Cossack!

      Here is a typical photo of the Orenburg Cossacks of the second half of the 19 century. Going on a trip to Central Asia. Where without fodder. Take a look at the faces. Comments are redundant. One word is international.
      1. -2
        13 October 2012 16: 47
        Quote: Centurion
        Take a look at the faces.

        and I'm talking about, if not a two-meter, blue-eyed blond, then not shield!
  5. +2
    13 October 2012 20: 42
    Honest man, patriot and brilliant officer!
    He did everything he could to prevent the "bawlers" from tearing Russia apart! He died a heroic death!

    Glory to the Russian MAN Lavr Georgievich Kornilov!
    1. Oles
      0
      13 October 2012 21: 18
      Yes, Vlaleks. eternal glory and honor !!!
    2. -2
      14 October 2012 03: 53
      Quote: Vlaleks48
      brilliant officer

      sorry this brilliant officer can’t shoot a gun!
      1. Oles
        +1
        14 October 2012 14: 46
        a shot))) in the direction of Israel)))
  6. Oles
    +1
    13 October 2012 21: 32
    "To restore discipline in the army, at the request of General Kornilov, the Provisional Government introduces the death penalty. By decisive and harsh methods, with the use of deserters in exceptional cases, General Kornilov restores the Army's combat effectiveness and restores the front. At this moment, General Kornilov, in the eyes of many, becomes folk hero, great hopes began to be pinned on him, and the salvation of the country was expected from him. "

    General Romanovsky, one of the generals arrested along with General Kornilov, said later: “They can shoot Kornilov, send his accomplices to hard labor, but Kornilovism in Russia will not perish, since Kornilovism is love for the Motherland, a desire to save Russia "and these high motives not to throw any dirt, not to trample to any haters of Russia." tears ... tears of pride for such PEOPLE ...

    The Most Holy of Titles, the title of Man, is disgraced as never before. The Russian man is disgraced - and what would it be, where would we put our eyes if there were no “ice campaigns”! Ivan Bunin. Cursed days.

    More than once in places passing from hand to hand, volunteers found the mutilated corpses of their comrades-in-arms, heard the chilling story of witnesses of these killings, who were saved by a miracle from the hands of the Bolsheviks. I remember the horror that blew upon me when the first time I brought eight tortured volunteers from Bataysk - chopped, punched, with disfigured faces, in which close relatives could hardly distinguish their native features ... Late in the evening, somewhere far in the backyard of the freight station, Among the mass of trains I found a carriage with corpses, driven there by order of the Rostov authorities, "so as not to cause excesses." And when, at the dim flickering of wax candles, the priest, timidly looking around, proclaimed “eternal memory to the murdered”, his heart sank with pain, and there was no forgiveness to the tormentors ... I remember my trip to the Taganrog Front in mid-January. At one of the stations near Matveev Kurgan, on the platform lay a body covered with matting. It was the corpse of the station manager, who was killed by the Bolsheviks, who learned that his sons were serving in the Volunteer Army. They chopped his father's hands and feet, opened the abdominal cavity and buried him still alive in the ground. The twisted limbs and bloodied, wounded fingers showed what efforts the unfortunate took to get out of the grave. Here were his two sons - officers who came from the reserve to take the body of his father and take him to Rostov. The carriage with the deceased was hitched to the train in which I was driving. At some passing station, one of the sons, seeing a carriage with the captured Bolsheviks, fell into a frenzy, burst into the carriage and, while the guard came to his senses, shot several people ...

    and further. "By order of the red commander Sivers, all those related to the Volunteer Army were to be executed, the order also extended to children of fourteen and fifteen years old who enrolled in the army of General Kornilov, however, perhaps because of the prohibition of their parents, who did not go with her on a campaign to the Kuban "
  7. yacht
    0
    13 October 2012 21: 36
    The general is a loser, from the same cohort as Denikin, Kolchak, Wrangel and other odious personalities. The main thing for them was the thirst for their own power, everything else was empty words. And somehow, behind all this husk, the true patriots of the fatherland remain in the shadow.
    1. Oles
      -1
      13 October 2012 21: 48
      no, yakhont. you drive. he was a patriot. and this one too http://www.c-cafe.ru/days/bio/24/markov.php
      1. yacht
        0
        13 October 2012 22: 12
        I can’t say anything about Markov, I don’t know, I can’t draw conclusions on the basis of one and clearly one-sided article.
        1. 0
          14 October 2012 04: 01
          but my great-grandfather, besides World War I, fought with the whites from the very beginning bully Do you want to tell how civilized white officers treated the inhabitants of the village they entered after the battle?
          why exactly Kornilov was driven tied to a horse through the streets?
          - By the way, I can describe in detail exactly what the prelude torture looked like - spanking with a ramrod hi
          and what Markov and another hero of the defense of Crimea were famous for.
          1. Yoshkin Kot
            -2
            14 October 2012 10: 54
            Do not repeat the tales of Bonch-Bruevich! and by the way, in what kind of grandfather did your grandmother dominate? how many Russian children did you kill?
            1. Oles
              0
              14 October 2012 14: 42
              plus, Kotyara))) yes ... tales of the Vienna forest ... just don’t swear ...
              1. Oles
                -3
                14 October 2012 14: 54
                OPS!)) Someone scattered with minuses ...)) Are you Kalson? doesn’t do honor)) I’ll play you ... I’m not going to fall for a long time ...))
      2. stroporez
        0
        14 October 2012 23: 33
        why not one of these ovs has moved the slogan --- "for the faith, the king and the fatherland" ?????????? means not the fatherland in the first place was ........... .............
    2. Zynaps
      0
      14 October 2012 01: 21
      Do not bother children masturbate squatting on the beaten. they are now given such an installation from above. they don’t give a damn about the real historical choice of their grandfathers - they now have the honor of rebels and entertainers of the Civil War.
    3. Konrad
      0
      14 October 2012 22: 08
      Quote: yacht
      And somehow, behind all this husk, true patriots of the fatherland remain in the shadow

      What are these true?
  8. not good
    +3
    14 October 2012 00: 47
    Kornilov initially coordinated his actions with Prime Minister Kerensky, but he got scared at the last moment and Kornilov remained extreme. Unfortunately, little has changed today, politicians have become even more corrupt, and professionals have been pushed away.
    1. -2
      14 October 2012 04: 02
      Quote: Negoro
      . Unfortunately, little has changed today, politicians have become even more corrupt, and professionals have been pushed away

      I agree.
  9. +1
    14 October 2012 05: 02
    the people who inhabited the territory of the Russian Empire made a choice, and despite the enemy intervention and help to the traitors, the hungry and impoverished people during the Civil War made a choice!
    1. Yoshkin Kot
      0
      14 October 2012 14: 44
      Yeah, just the same "voluntary" choice was, I wonder why Kronstadt was shot? Permian? poisoned peasants in the Tambov forests? mass shooting of Russian people?
  10. -1
    14 October 2012 06: 40
    need, white, cut out in the vine:
    1. Oles
      -1
      14 October 2012 14: 44
      get sick, baby))) The White Movement lived, is alive and will live forever !!! to the glory of Russia
      1. 0
        14 October 2012 18: 17
        Which Russia?
        These goners have neither a program nor a brain. One profit is to kill the Russians with foreign money and mirror it with the Reds.
        1. Oles
          -2
          14 October 2012 19: 28
          Kuga. did you go down to minus one too? like that one. with a propeller ...?))
  11. stroporez
    +1
    14 October 2012 23: 07
    Kornilovism, like the entire White movement, was initially doomed. because initially, "in the bud" it was betrayed by the "civilized world"
    1. Ares1
      0
      14 October 2012 23: 33
      I agree. Because the "civilized" world was not in vain trying to destroy Russia. And who from the "civilized" world really supported the white movement? Crumbs fed for the final collapse of the country in a fratricidal war. No one needed a strong Russia. Actually, what has changed today? These are the parallels of history.
      1. stroporez
        +1
        14 October 2012 23: 44
        from ia about to.schaz the "civilized" world is allegedly struggling to "help" "wild" Russia. sometimes you just want to bark --- that's enough !!!!!!! you have already "helped" .....
  12. +1
    15 October 2012 06: 12
    an interesting thing - time ... the more it passes, the stronger the opinion about the events that happened earlier and the people who took part in them ... those who have recently been perceived as villains and traitors, suddenly turn out to be patriots and heroes ... and those who were considered heroes and patriots, in fact turn out to be villains and traitors ...