Finnish Defense Minister: We are ready to fight Russia if it attacks

273

The head of the Finnish Ministry of Defense, Timo Kivinen, said that his country is ready to resist "Russian aggression." This is reported by Reuters.

According to the general who headed the military department in 2019, the Finnish army over the past decades has been able to prepare well for a possible confrontation with a strong enemy. The country has an impressive arsenal of weapons, and Finnish soldiers have a high level of motivation.



Speaking about the conflict in Ukraine, Kivinen stressed that his country was preparing for just such a scenario. Therefore, as he put it, Finland is ready to fight with Russia in case of its attack.

Ukraine is too tough for Russia, like Finland

- declared the general.

It is worth noting that relations between Helsinki and Moscow are becoming increasingly tense. Previously neutral, Finland recently decided to apply to join NATO, which poses a serious threat to Russia's security. At the same time, Sweden took a similar step.

So far, Turkey is standing in the way of the aforementioned countries joining the alliance, which demands from their authorities to recognize the PKK as a terrorist organization. However, there is no doubt that sooner or later Ankara will still give the green light to the “expansion” of the bloc.

Returning to the statements of Timo Kivinen, the general should remember how the previous confrontations between Finland and the Soviet Union, whose successor is Russia, ended. During the two wars, the Finns lost about 100 thousand soldiers and a tenth of their territory. For many years, Finland was completely part of Russia (the Russian Empire).
273 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    22 June 2022 17: 28
    That's because "hot Finnish guys." "Finland has no rocket launchers" (c)
    1. +36
      22 June 2022 17: 31
      I agree. Judging by their statements, they have no self-preservation instinct either.
      1. nnm
        +4
        22 June 2022 17: 41
        Well, in essence, the statement of the MINISTER OF DEFENSE does not matter which country, what did he say wrong? No, I should have said - will we all surrender together?
        1. +21
          22 June 2022 17: 46
          Quote: nnm
          Well, in essence, the statement of the MINISTER OF DEFENSE does not matter which country, what did he say wrong?

          How did you not notice his obvious nonsense?
          Ukraine is too tough for Russia, like Finland

          Already everyone about the teeth is silent. Except Finn.
          1. -39
            22 June 2022 17: 58
            How did you not notice his obvious nonsense?

            The Finns shot down their arrogance well even from the Red Army. And during the Soviet-Finnish, and in the 44th. Our aviation did not experience such a shame even from the Germans. This is what it means to underestimate the enemy. For your information - the Finns are in first place in terms of the number of aces pilots per capita. What, were you surprised?
            And with Ukraine, he just went a little too far. It would be funny if a four times smaller country defeated Russia. Maybe we can laugh? . They will stir up Minsk-3, 4, 5 .. Our current diplomats can’t even do that.
            1. +20
              22 June 2022 18: 13
              And with Ukraine, he just went a little too far. It would be funny if a four times smaller country defeated Russia
              9 times smaller Afghanistan US defeated...
              I did not consider the coalition and collaborators ....
              1. +2
                22 June 2022 18: 56
                Quote: Negruz
                9 times smaller Afghanistan US defeated...

                Do you remember about Vietnam? wink
                The United States traditionally lost in the war proxy through proxy: the Taliban supported by the Pak, who in turn were supported by the "factory of the world".
                1. +1
                  22 June 2022 21: 28
                  Opposite the Soviet troops in the DRA, the "peace coalition" was more powerful!
                  1. +7
                    22 June 2022 22: 51
                    Finnish Defense Minister: We are ready to fight Russia if it attacks

                    And Russia will not fight with Finland in case of its attack.
                    We will simply destroy it, not fight.
                    Why should we ruin our soldiers for saving the inhabitants of enemies?
                    So only shelling and bombing.
                    With the destruction of infrastructure.
                    They will ask for peace.
                    1. -6
                      23 June 2022 09: 46
                      Quote: Shurik70
                      So only shelling and bombing

                      )))
                      Do you understand that these are not Ukrainians who disarmed themselves for 30 years? What will fly to Moscow on the first day?
                      1. -1
                        23 June 2022 10: 23
                        Quote: Negro
                        What will fly to Moscow on the first day?

                        And what will arrive? bully
                      2. -2
                        23 June 2022 10: 57
                        AGM-158, of course. And then how will it go.
                      3. 0
                        23 June 2022 11: 07
                        To do this, the planes still need to take off.
                        And are they already available?
                      4. -2
                        23 June 2022 11: 21
                        It's been there for a long time. And who will not be able to take off there, just using the example of Ukraine, you can tell.
                      5. +2
                        23 June 2022 12: 09
                        Quote: Negro
                        There is a long time.

                        How long ago? How many Finns have now??

                        Quote: Negro
                        And who will not be able to take off there, just using the example of Ukraine, you can tell.

                        Oh well. Really compared? laughing
                      6. -3
                        23 June 2022 12: 52
                        Quote: Alex777
                        How long ago? How many Finns have now??

                        400 km since 2015, 70 pieces. The 800killer ones were supposed to come in the bag with the penguins, but given the circumstances, I wouldn't count on them not being there right now.
                        Quote: Alex777
                        Really compared?

                        Are there other examples of the work of the RF Armed Forces against someone's aircraft?
                      7. +1
                        23 June 2022 12: 56
                        Quote: Negro
                        800 killer should have come in a bag with penguins

                        The contract began to be discussed last year. I'm sure we haven't done it yet. Enough problems with components.

                        Quote: Negro
                        Are there other examples of the work of the RF Armed Forces against someone's aircraft?

                        Incomparable size of territory and infrastructure.
                        In addition, we have SVO, and not "scorched earth tactics." The Finns don't get that courtesy.
                      8. +1
                        23 June 2022 13: 43
                        Quote: Alex777
                        The contract began to be discussed last year. I'm sure we haven't done it yet.

                        If Joe is not 100% on your side, then he can allocate a hundred missiles for such a case even tomorrow.
                        Quote: Alex777
                        Incomparable size of territory and infrastructure.

                        Just with the infrastructure in Finland, everything is an order of magnitude better, these are not KVN workers for you.
                        Quote: Alex777
                        In addition, we have SVO, and not "scorched earth tactics"

                        "Russia is fighting with its hands tied", series 119.
                      9. 0
                        23 June 2022 14: 49
                        Quote: Negro
                        If Joe is not 100% on your side, then he can allocate a hundred missiles for such a case even tomorrow.

                        Share: where do you write from?
                        Not from Finland Negro? bully

                        Quote: Negro
                        Just with the infrastructure in Finland, everything is an order of magnitude better, these are not KVN workers for you.

                        You don't make me laugh like that. How are you
                        an adult, and then like a very young man ... bully
                      10. +2
                        23 June 2022 19: 44
                        Quote: Negro
                        Do you understand that these are not Ukrainians who disarmed themselves for 30 years? What will fly to Moscow on the first day?

                        And you understand that Finland is not Ukraine.
                        There are practically no rears. The entire country from the border in the coverage area of ​​short-range missiles. And around St. Petersburg there is a powerful air defense system, many times superior to what is at the front in Ukraine.
                        The main thing is not to repeat the mistake of the Finnish war - no need to send troops there
                      11. 0
                        23 June 2022 19: 55
                        You sent me a message. I am like
                        I understand and agree with you. wink
                2. -5
                  23 June 2022 09: 45
                  Quote: Alexey RA
                  The United States has traditionally been defeated in the proxy-by-proxy war.

                  The United States has traditionally been defeated in the war between the State Department and the Pentagon.
                3. +4
                  23 June 2022 10: 45
                  Quote: Alexey RA
                  Do you remember about Vietnam?

                  Vietnam is generally an amazing story about how you can lose a war without losing a single battle.
              2. The comment was deleted.
            2. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
            3. +10
              22 June 2022 18: 15
              For your information - the Finns are in first place in terms of the number of aces pilots per capita. What, were you surprised?

              The war is not won by pilots alone
              aces.
              And I’m sure there will be territorial acquisitions in Ukraine, but it’s hard to predict the size.
              1. -5
                23 June 2022 09: 53
                Quote: Mikhail Sidorov
                The war is not won by aces pilots alone

                )))
                Yes, the USSR was bigger than Finland. Is this news?
            4. +14
              22 June 2022 18: 38
              Quote: dauria
              For your information - the Finns are in first place in terms of the number of aces pilots per capita. What, were you surprised?


              Also be surprised.
              1. -8
                23 June 2022 09: 55
                This clown with an alternative count of German aircraft? He has been known for a long time.
                1. 0
                  23 June 2022 10: 40
                  Quote: Negro
                  This clown with an alternative count of German aircraft? He has been known for a long time.

                  Who are you talking about? About Kiselyov, Timin or Potapov? In my understanding the definition
                  This clown with an alternative count of German aircraft

                  Suitable for Timin and Kiselev.
                  1. +1
                    23 June 2022 11: 02
                    About the skyartist, of course, and which of the other clowns he raked up. That's who should be closed for mockery of WWII veterans.
                    1. 0
                      23 June 2022 11: 09
                      Quote: Negro
                      About the skyartist, of course, and which of the other clowns he raked up. That's who should be closed for mockery of WWII veterans.

                      Yes? And for me, typical clowns are those whom I named. It is they who, with comically serious faces, talk about the fact that when two boxers of approximately the same weight category meet in the ring, one punches the other ten times in the pack, and the second punches the first one. And at the same time, for some reason, the second one confidently wins, let's say, in the fourth round.
                      1. -1
                        23 June 2022 11: 19
                        These are the backlashes, which the three of them stammered not without difficulty, were they one with the Red Army Air Force in the weight category? Very interesting, keep watching.
            5. +6
              22 June 2022 18: 49
              Quote: dauria
              For your information - the Finns are in first place in terms of the number of aces pilots per capita.

              Well, if you write in the downed red-star R-38 Lightnings, then there will be not such numbers. smile
            6. +9
              22 June 2022 19: 26
              Here is the answer to your Russophobia - During the two wars, the Finns lost about 100 thousand soldiers and a tenth of their territory.
            7. +5
              22 June 2022 22: 14
              A shame? The Finns lost their territories, gave land for a military base in Gangut, and after the war in Porkkala-Ud. They forced the Finns to beat the Germans in the Lapland War .. If they wanted to, they would have taken Lapland or a piece of Bothnia after 45 - the Finns would not have done anything. So what's the shame?
            8. +7
              22 June 2022 23: 28
              Quote: dauria
              The Finns shot down their arrogance well even from the Red Army. And during the Soviet-Finnish, and in the 44th. Our aviation did not experience such a shame even from the Germans.

              Nice person. The Finns fought bravely in the Winter, but at 44 they fought bravely against the Nazis. In fact, the Russian Empire gave the Finns sovereignty for the second time
              1. -5
                23 June 2022 09: 55
                Quote: Tusv
                In fact, the Russian Empire gave the Finns sovereignty for the second time

                Mostly Churchill.
            9. 0
              23 June 2022 17: 20
              only now it’s not the 39th, and no one will take the Mannerheim line with “bayonets”. Although the Finns do not discount the presence of long-range artillery)
          2. nnm
            0
            22 June 2022 17: 59
            Well, about "everyone is silent", it was you, of course, who surprised me. But so be it.
            And about my comment - in the title of the article, as a rule, the main idea of ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbthe event is taken out. This is exactly what I commented on.
            1. +3
              22 June 2022 18: 09
              Quote: nnm
              Well, about "everyone is silent", it was you, of course, who surprised me.

              I'm talking about the fact that conflict resolution on the battlefield in the EU is already
              no one is waiting. And they write a lot about the superiority of the RF Armed Forces.
              And Biden, in general, forbade his ministers about
              a possible "Ukraine's victory" to speak publicly. Velel
              they should cool down and be silent... Only poor Boris is rushing about. hi
              1. nnm
                +3
                22 June 2022 18: 54
                I don't have information about what Biden told ministers. But I have not been a supporter of hats, and over the past 4 months, I have become even less of them. But I will say something else - any war with NATO countries immediately, with lightning speed, takes away the risk of starting a nuclear war to the skies.
                Where no one will win anyone, but everyone will lose.
                1. +3
                  22 June 2022 19: 33
                  but you don’t need everyone one size fits all. UNDER equal conditions, countries with a large population and a lower density will survive. Europe with its high rates will be destroyed 100%
                  1. nnm
                    -4
                    22 June 2022 19: 38
                    I don’t think that, taking into account what the radiation contamination will be like, it’s clear that everything that is there will be used - both chemical and bioweapons, and so on. , with the actual destruction of production (simply due to cooperation), the economy, pharmaceuticals, agriculture, the survivors will very soon not envy the dead.
                    1. 0
                      22 June 2022 23: 13
                      Quote: nnm
                      everything that is there will be used - both chemical and bioweapons, etc.

                      Goss... do you have any idea what a modern city is? The same water disinfection stations. CHLORINE. And there's a lot of it belay

                      And there are also freons, and other, ahem, charms ... well, what the hell, yeah ...
                    2. +2
                      23 June 2022 06: 42
                      In fact, the danger of radiation contamination is greatly exaggerated. "Dirty" ammunition, incl. with cores of depleted uranium, leave behind long-lived isotopes. A vigorous bonba is practically a clean weapon. Plutonium has reacted - there are no long-lived isotopes. After a fairly short time, one can live without PPE. Hiroshima and Nagasaki with Novaya Zemlya are proof of this.
                  2. -5
                    22 June 2022 22: 48
                    How long have you been released from the ward?
                  3. -1
                    23 June 2022 10: 55
                    Quote: Seeker
                    comb. UNDER equal conditions, countries with a large number of population and its lower density will survive.

                    Stans will not survive any. Well, if only African and possibly South American. In Russia, perhaps a part of the population will survive, but the country will not.
                2. +1
                  22 June 2022 19: 44
                  Quote: nnm
                  I don't have information about what Biden told ministers. But I have not been a supporter of hats, and over the past 4 months, I have become even less of them.

                  Here is quite encouraging news from the independents:
                  Our source in the OP said that the Pentagon demanded that American PMCs withdraw US citizens from Ukraine within a month. At the moment, about 1000 military PMCs have been hired in the United States by our oligarchs, and about 3000 more representatives of European countries.

                  The main thing is to start .. (c) Gorbachev.
                  1. 0
                    23 June 2022 10: 08
                    Quote: Alex777
                    Our source in the OP said that the Pentagon demanded from American PMCs

                    Very interesting. So you're saying Joe is openly helping his friend Vlad again?

                    And what is the source of this amazing news?
                    1. -1
                      23 June 2022 10: 14
                      OP is the office of President Zelensky.
                      1. 0
                        23 June 2022 10: 47
                        President Zelensky's office leaking information to anonymous Russian-language tedegram channels? There seems to be a specially trained Arestovich for strange statements.
                      2. -1
                        23 June 2022 11: 01
                        There are well-known Ukrainian tedegram channels. Yes
                3. 0
                  22 June 2022 20: 58
                  any war with NATO countries immediately, with lightning speed, takes away the risk of starting a nuclear war to the skies.
                  Where no one will win anyone, but everyone will lose.

                  Well, NATO does not think so, otherwise it would have remained within the borders of 1990. But they keep climbing and climbing to our borders. Well, if a fight cannot be avoided, then, as Putin says, you need to hit first.
                  The Western holy obstinacy is especially touching that Russia will not start first.
                4. +2
                  23 June 2022 10: 02
                  Quote: nnm
                  Where no one will win anyone, but everyone will lose

                  It depends on how seriously the problem of Russia is taken. If Putin proves that his threats to use nuclear weapons should be taken seriously, then the risks and benefits of the final decision will be reconsidered.
              2. 0
                23 June 2022 09: 57
                Quote: Alex777
                I'm talking about the fact that no one is waiting for a solution to the conflict on the battlefield in the EU

                So no one?
                Quote: Alex777
                they write a lot about the superiority of the RF Armed Forces

                Why not write the truth?
                Quote: Alex777
                But Biden, in general, forbade his ministers to speak publicly about a possible "victory of Ukraine"

                ))
                Did he mail you too?
                1. -1
                  23 June 2022 10: 21
                  Quote: Negro
                  So no one?

                  Tell me then - who? Besides Johnson?

                  Quote: Negro
                  Why not write the truth?

                  Here you agreed. Good.

                  Quote: Negro
                  ))
                  Did he mail you too?

                  I monitor both our and Ukrainian resources. If there is only one piece of information, I think that it is trustworthy.
                  You chuckle to what? wink
                  1. 0
                    23 June 2022 10: 55
                    Quote: Alex777
                    Tell me then - who? Besides Johnson?

                    Statements for a military solution came from the British, the Poles and the EU authorities Borrell/Ursula. They are opposed by a coalition of p-owls in the person of Scholz, Macron and Draghi. However, I note that we know this dramaturgy mainly from the same Zelensky. Scholz-Makron-Draghi themselves have not yet announced any ideas of Minsk-3 and "peace in exchange for land". Moreover, Italy launched its "peace proposals" in the spring, which included, among other things, a settlement on the Crimea - Lavrov then burned out.
                    Quote: Alex777
                    Here you agreed

                    And what is there to argue with? The Armed Forces of Ukraine are now unable to ensure the consumption of shells and air weapons at the level of the Russian Federation.
                    Quote: Alex777
                    both our and Ukrainian resources

                    And kolonelasada and podlyak? Yeah, they won't lie.
                    1. -1
                      23 June 2022 11: 03
                      Quote: Negro
                      Quote: Alex777
                      both our and Ukrainian resources

                      And kolonelasada and podlyak? Yeah, they won't lie.

                      Well, since you obviously made conclusions, then what to talk about? Good luck! wink
          3. +1
            23 June 2022 09: 43
            Quote: Alex777
            obvious nonsense and did not notice?
            Ukraine is too tough for Russia, like Finland

            Already everyone about the teeth is silent. Except Finn.

            And what is wrong?
      2. +4
        22 June 2022 18: 21
        It looks like the memory is gone.
      3. 0
        22 June 2022 18: 57
        Timo Kivinen said that his country is ready to resist "Russian aggression".

        I propose to the militant Finns to build a new line of defense - the Kivinen Line.
      4. 0
        23 June 2022 02: 21
        What the Swedish aristocracy says to them, they voice it. The Swedes do not feel sorry for the Finns. It's like the Galicians do not feel sorry for the Eastern Ukrainians.
    2. +4
      22 June 2022 17: 55
      "Finland has no rocket launchers" (with

      The main thing is to make a statement, and everything else is not even worth doubting, they will be put by "friends who dearly love" Russia.
      1. -2
        22 June 2022 18: 21
        Have you seen the copy? This is a quote, even so - quotes.
        For me, sprinkle everyone with dust, and who will scatter with a slipper.
    3. +3
      22 June 2022 17: 58
      don't worry about them! installations will be delivered at any time!
      1. +4
        22 June 2022 18: 10
        The head of the Finnish Ministry of Defense is sick in the head, before declaring such a thing, he would have thought with his empty head, why should we attack Finland. They lived quietly next to each other for so many years, and suddenly everyone began to become paranoid that the Russians set out to conquer all of Scandinavia and it was imperative to protect themselves from them and joining NATO would help in this.
        1. +1
          22 June 2022 18: 15
          why not why the main thing is that he speaks for his own people and not for the citizens of the Russian Federation!
        2. +1
          22 June 2022 22: 17
          Only Finland is not Scandinavia.
        3. -1
          23 June 2022 10: 10
          Quote: Borik
          I would think with my empty head why we attack Finland.

          And this is exactly a question for the Finns?
          1. 0
            23 June 2022 10: 27
            Quote: Negro
            And this is exactly a question for the Finns?

            So it's the Finns who say that they have been preparing for war with us for a long time? Not?
            1. 0
              23 June 2022 11: 00
              Naturally, they have long been preparing for war, more than 100 years. And well prepared, frankly. What do you think the War Department should do?
    4. +9
      22 June 2022 18: 05
      Quote: Roman_VH
      That's because "hot Finnish guys." "Finland has no rocket launchers" (c)

      And this , which does not sit peacefully , calmly ! What did they resolve? Lived not grieve! They enjoyed the privileged position of neutral, in relation to the USSR-Russia, all sorts of discounts and deliveries of all kinds at very reasonable prices ... No! Break everything, spat in the direction of the breadwinner, so what? What for ? Are they also extra chromosomes?
      1. +6
        22 June 2022 18: 15
        Quote: 30 vis
        And this , which does not sit peacefully , calmly ! What did they resolve?

        Don't you understand? I will give an example from the memoirs of the American political scientist Roberts:
        “A few years ago, I was in the Pentagon in the office of a very high official who was offered an important appointment. I took the opportunity to ask a question about something that had puzzled me for a long time. How, I asked, does Washington get foreign governments to support US interests at the expense of their own countries? - shared secret information American political scientist Paul Craig Roberts.
        To such a question, a high-ranking Pentagon official answered briefly, literally in one word: "Money." When Roberts clarified whether foreign aid to these states was meant in the form of grants or something like that, his interlocutor explained that the finances were not directed to the development of countries, but personally to the pockets of the rulers.
        “We give political leaders bags full of money. They (leaders) belong to us. They report to us, ”the Pentagon official answered Roberts.

        Do you think why Finnish President Sauli Niinistö flew to Yusu to report to Bidon immediately after the vote in the Finnish parliament on joining the NATA? feel
        1. -4
          23 June 2022 10: 13
          Amazing stories from political scientists.

          In the Beautiful Russia of the Future, if it suddenly appears, all political scientists will go to the Kommunarka training ground.
    5. +11
      22 June 2022 18: 36
      With a population of 5,5 million people, the Finnish Armed Forces has an armed force of about 280 people, + 000 reservists.
      They have 19000 contractors.
      Unlike other EU countries, military service has not been cancelled.
      Helsinki has an underground command center built in the 1980s to protect city government from a nuclear blast, as well as about 5500 civil defense shelters for ordinary citizens.
      The shelters in Helsinki are ready to receive 990 people, out of a population of 000.
      They have a law: if you build an apartment building, build a bomb shelter.
      As we had under the USSR, even better and stricter. Everything is working.
      200 Jassm-ER missiles (get to Moscow)
      and just Jassm for 370 km. There are either 300 or 500
      Navy:
      42 vessels (one Pohjanmaa-type minelayer, two Hämeenmaa-type minelayers, three Pansio; 4 Rauma-type missile boats and the same number of Hamina-type; 6 Kuha-type and 7 Kiiski-type minesweepers, 4 Syoksy-type command boats; 3 transport vessels of the Kampela and 5 Valas-class; one Jurmo-class landing craft and a Uisko-class transport

      +4 new ones ordered (like corvettes)
      64*F-18C and 60*F-35
      Ordered 2000 UAVs
      Artillery is very good.
      Javelins were also shipped to them.
      ----
      It's not a weak opponent
      1. 0
        22 June 2022 22: 19
        This is a stupid adversary. They could continue to live and not blow in the mustache. And they chose to die.
        1. +5
          22 June 2022 22: 59
          Never assume that the opponent is @stupid@. This is the way to lose the war.
          Canaris poured into Hitler’s ears that the USSR was “ear of clay with feet of clay” and did not know how to fight (just after the Finnish one) ... Hitler got a kick.
          The Americans considered the Vietnamese stupid yellow monkeys: they learned so much that even today they will not climb into Vietnam with weapons.
          However: you know better.
          I did not understand only the opus "but preferred to die." belay
          Have you confused reality?
          1. 0
            23 June 2022 18: 51
            I am not, but you are. When Hitler fought, there were no nuclear weapons. And now the nucleus resets all your numbers to zero. Shelters may be ready, but how are they going to live in the nuclear sphere? There to fish, not to collect berries. One solid Chernobyl. It is not clear why they did not live peacefully? Old grievances resurfaced? It can be very costly for them.
            1. -1
              23 June 2022 19: 32
              You are here a lot of irrelevant cracking, but the concept is zero.
              When Hitler fought, there were no nuclear weapons.

              1. For general development: compare the lizard of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I give a hint to the especially gifted: houses made of paper and stone.
              Compare, if you can master, of course, the equivalent of the usual TNT to Tokyo (Dresden, Hamburg, and the same "nucleus" to Hiroshima and the results.
              2. With us, after all the innovations of the “nucleus”, stop destroying OR:
              - US military bases
              OR:
              - energy and part of the infrastructure
              OR
              - DISPERSED (unlike us) storage sites for nuclear weapons
              OR
              -cities with a potential reserve for the US Armed Forces
              Anywhere either. There is nothing for Finland.
              Shelters may be ready, but how are they going to live in the nuclear sphere?

              You won’t run away with us (only for the VKS (remaining) and the presidential administration
              It is not clear why they did not live peacefully?

              This is what you ask them. Get off the couch, visit and ask around.
              And tie Skabeev to watch and listen to the nonsense of "colonel" Korotchenko
              1. 0
                24 June 2022 17: 32
                You should look at your front, and not at the Finns. There, another batch of cooks and drivers surrendered. Ukrainians, of course, amaze with their fanaticism and idolatry in relation to Rosved. You are for the night Skabeev, Kiseleva. Do you see Solovyov? By God, I did not know these characters until the Ukrainians stubbornly began to talk about them.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +2
        23 June 2022 10: 17
        Quote from TreeSmall
        64*F-18C and 60*F-35

        There are no penguins yet. It was said that they would not be added to the hornets, but would replace the hornets, which are far from new. Although, given the new circumstances, these plans may be revised.
        Quote from TreeSmall
        It's not a weak opponent

        This is a country with the size of the economy and the military budget of Ukraine, which relies on quality. Plus, there are no KVNschikov in the leadership. True, there are many feminists, but this does not seem to affect military issues yet, unlike Germany.
        1. -1
          23 June 2022 18: 52
          So no one is going to run around the Finnish swamps. A couple of yards and Newukraina in soot and radioactive ash.
      3. 0
        23 June 2022 12: 56
        . In peacetime, the armed forces employ about 12 people in domestic positions, about a third of whom are civilians or have received civilian training.[000] 10 conscripts are trained by the Defense Forces every year.[22
        1. -2
          23 June 2022 15: 58
          This is old information from Wikipedia.
          . [10]

          Especially the Russian Wiki, and even the old ones from 2010 or 2007
          Learn:
          https://puolustusvoimat.fi/en/frontpage


    6. +4
      22 June 2022 19: 04
      How is it not?
      Are there F-18 fighters?
      So, they can carry all sorts of interesting things shooting up to 980 km.
      From the well-known Harpoon anti-ship missiles in the Baltic to the tactical AGM-158 missile launchers with a launch range of 980 km.
      In the conditions of the relief of Karelia, the latter are generally a terrible thing.
    7. -3
      22 June 2022 21: 22
      Quote: Roman_VH
      "Finland has no rocket launchers" (c)

      And 200 long-range missiles for the F-35A? Is it against Sweden or Estonia?
      Everything will be given to them. And the US Army.
      Are we ready to fight with Finland in case of its attack or threat from its territory?
  2. +31
    22 June 2022 17: 30
    Ukraine is too tough for Russia, like Finland
    - application
    And this is said by a representative of a country that TWICE signed humiliating peace agreements for itself after LOSING in military clashes with Russia, in the 20th century. So moreover, it is completely obliged to the same Russia for its independence
    1. -1
      22 June 2022 17: 51
      well, since history does not teach anything, it means they will be annexed to the Republic of Karelia as part of the Russian Federation, if the barrel is really rolled
    2. +9
      22 June 2022 17: 51
      Maybe this woodpecker thinks that again the Russians will be stopped by snipers alone? And .... s, as respected people say. But, for a long time the USSR, then Russia and Finland lived almost amicably and without tension. Again, the Americans and the British tried.
    3. +13
      22 June 2022 17: 55
      This is what the humanism of Comrade Stalin is now casting on us .. How many enemies he regretted, although he could have slammed him .. How many he forgave, hoping for gratitude .. But one word of his - and instead of Poland there would be a miserable stub around Warsaw, instead of Germany - about five small German quasi-states, all of Finland would fit in Lapland, I’m generally silent about the rest of the harmful trifle .. Eh .. Well - science in advance, you can’t forgive enemies, you can’t ..
      1. +2
        22 June 2022 18: 01
        that's where humanism leads war there to beat ships not to beat!
      2. -10
        22 June 2022 18: 22
        Not humanism, but pragmatism, after a difficult war with the Finns, it became clear that the complete occupation of Finland would cost a lot of resources. Well, neither did the Finns want to become “serfs” of Soviet citizens.
        1. +5
          22 June 2022 18: 56
          Quote from: stirrer
          . Well, neither did the Finns want to become “serfs” of Soviet citizens.

          And remind me, which of the citizens of the countries that fell under Soviet occupation suddenly immediately became "Soviet citizens"? Austrians, Germans?
          1. -5
            22 June 2022 19: 21
            Well, it turned out easier with the Germans, they themselves quickly built all sorts of Stasi dictatorships, ours had to build a wall there just for “little things”, so that from a happy socialist. block did not run away to the "animal" west. With the Finns, probably (since the Soviet Union did not decide on occupation), this would not have happened, they would have to constantly be forced to love the socialist system, and this could also have a corrupting effect on the Soviet army itself. I have a relative from the Tomsk village who served in the GDR and, in fact, returned from the army as a “dissident” and brought so much “anti-Sovietism”.
            1. +3
              22 June 2022 19: 27
              Quote from: stirrer
              Well, it turned out easier with the Germans,

              What about the Austrians? And you never answered which of them became "Soviet citizens"
              1. -6
                22 June 2022 19: 31
                In Austria they did not, but in Lithuania and Latvia they did.
                1. +1
                  22 June 2022 19: 42
                  Quote from: stirrer
                  and in Lithuania and Latvia they have become.

                  Those times... Were they occupied when they decided to voluntarily join the USSR?
                  1. -2
                    22 June 2022 20: 53
                    Well, if you pretend to be a "hose", then of course they voluntarily entered, and then they voluntarily moved deep into the USSR. And they also wanted to pull off such a trick with the Finns, after all, workers “appeared” there too, who asked to join the USSR.
                    1. +1
                      23 June 2022 00: 48
                      Quote from: stirrer
                      Well, if you pretend to be a “hose”, then of course they voluntarily entered, and then they voluntarily moved deep into the USSR

                      That is, you think that the formalities for VOLUNTARY accession were not observed?
                      And if they were moved to Siberia, then who inhabited and inhabits this territory now?
                      Quote from: stirrer
                      And they also wanted to pull off such a trick with the Finns, after all, workers “appeared” there too, who asked to join the USSR.

                      With the Finns, this would not have happened. Here is the same story that is largely now in Ukraine. It was necessary to do this earlier, when a third of the population of Finland supported the "Reds", and by 1939 the "Whites" thinned out the population very well ... calculating those who were or sympathized with the "Reds". And for this they didn’t need Siberia either, their Arctic region was enough
                      1. +1
                        23 June 2022 10: 24
                        Quote: svp67
                        You never answered which of them became "Soviet citizens"

                        Soviet citizens were former citizens of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Tuva (completely) Poland, Germany, Romania (partially). More questions?
                      2. 0
                        23 June 2022 11: 34
                        Quote: Negro
                        More questions?

                        And the Austrians?
                        Quote: Negro
                        Soviet citizens were former citizens of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Tuva (completely) Poland, Germany, Romania (partially).

                        Citizens of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania officially, and most importantly quite democratically, asked for this themselves ... there all the formalities were observed.
                        I don’t remember about Tuva, but there, in my opinion, the story is akin to the Far Eastern Republic
                        Citizens of Poland, Germany, Romania (partially), who did not want to become, they moved to the territory of Poland, Germany, Romania
                      3. +1
                        23 June 2022 11: 38
                        Austrians on request on a personal basis.
                      4. 0
                        23 June 2022 11: 50
                        Quote: Negro
                        Austrians on request on a personal basis.

                        And what's illegal?
                      5. 0
                        23 June 2022 12: 10
                        There are no questions about the Austrians, Norwegians, Danes and Iranians. For Finns, by the way, too.
                      6. 0
                        23 June 2022 13: 04
                        Quote: Negro
                        There are no questions about the Austrians, Norwegians, Danes and Iranians. For Finns, by the way, too.

                        You are not a typical Ukrainian
                      7. +1
                        23 June 2022 13: 39
                        Whether it's bad or good, but I'm not Ukrainian at all. And what, Ukrainians have some special relationship with the Austrians?
                      8. 0
                        23 June 2022 13: 42
                        Quote: Negro
                        Whether it's bad or good, but I'm not Ukrainian at all.

                        I have the opportunity to see your Internet address, it is Ukrainian.
                        Quote: Negro
                        And what, Ukrainians have some special relationship with the Austrians?

                        But only with them?
                      9. 0
                        23 June 2022 13: 49
                        Quote: svp67
                        I have the opportunity to see your Internet address

                        ))
                        You're lying
                        Quote: svp67
                        he is Ukrainian.
                        and you didn't guess.
                        Quote: svp67
                        But only with them?

                        No idea. Never heard of any problems with the Austrians.
                      10. 0
                        23 June 2022 13: 52
                        Quote: Negro
                        You're lying

                        To strangers, I tried never to do this ... When registering in 2017, you indicated: [email protected]
                        Do I need to explain what "UA" is or not?
                      11. 0
                        23 June 2022 13: 59
                        Oh, are you talking about mail? And in my surprise, I climbed my IP to check where Ukraine could come from.

                        Long forgotten about her.

                        OK, then I take back about the lies, comrade moderator. We ask for forgiveness.
                      12. 0
                        23 June 2022 14: 07
                        Quote: Negro
                        And in my surprise, I climbed my IP to check where Ukraine could come from.

                        No, everything is fine here, VPN works...
                        Quote: Negro
                        Long forgotten about her.

                        You're not alone
                        Quote: Negro
                        We ask for forgiveness.

                        We drove through
        2. Alf
          -1
          22 June 2022 19: 02
          Quote from: stirrer
          Not humanism, but pragmatism, after a difficult war with the Finns, it became clear that the complete occupation of Finland would cost a lot of resources. Well, neither did the Finns want to become “serfs” of Soviet citizens.

          Have you heard a joke with the words - Then Siberia will speak Finnish?
      3. -1
        22 June 2022 18: 39
        This is how the humanism of Comrade Stalin is now cast on us ..

        You do not drag Comrade Stalin. I understand that after February 24 it became fashionable to talk like that. Guilty: Lenin, later Khrushchev, a little later Strelkov (of course, the scale of personalities is not comparable). Everyone is to blame, except for the current government. Are you getting close to Stalin now? No, we won't give it to you. stop
        Another was the geopolitical situation, now to talk somehow unfairly about those events and evaluate decisions.
    4. +12
      22 June 2022 17: 58
      So moreover, it is completely obliged to the same Russia for its independence

      And you didn’t notice that those who were saved by Russia at one time or owe their birth to the world are the most dirty people.
      1. -8
        22 June 2022 19: 25
        And you didn’t notice that those who were saved by Russia at one time or owe their birth to the world are the most dirty people.


        Well then, if you talk like that, the United States saved us from starvation in the 20s and 90s, made us industrialize, saved us from defeat by the Germans (if anything, these are the words of Stalin), and we are not so grateful. It's just that in geopolitics it is necessary to move away from such an everyday level saved / not saved, there are only interests, primarily economic ones, today allies are enemies in 20 years, and so on in a circle.
        1. +4
          22 June 2022 19: 59
          Well then, if you think like that, the United States saved us from starvation in the 20s and 90s

          Well, I can’t say anything about 20, but about the 90s, didn’t they put their little hands on so that these 90s would come to us. Are you talking about the bush legs that they supplied us with wagons and with which they allegedly saved us from hunger? How much American food did you eat in the 90s? And yes, there was still bubble gum.
          1. -6
            22 June 2022 21: 01
            but about the 90s, didn’t they put their little hands so that these 90s would come to us.

            The United States is what side that we built initially not working socialism.

            Are you talking about the bush legs that they supplied us with wagons and with which they allegedly saved us from hunger? How much American food did you eat in the 90s? And yes, there was still bubble gum.


            And bush legs, including syringes, I remember disposable ones were imported.
            1. +1
              22 June 2022 21: 48
              The United States is what side that we built initially not working socialism.

              Well, and besides galoshes, we didn’t produce anything. And the United States was the first to fly into space, and in general we drank vodka, ate cabbage soup with bast shoes and played the balalaika.
        2. +2
          22 June 2022 20: 16
          Wasn't it then that they saved us from starvation when, at its height, they refused to pay in gold and demanded payment exclusively in grain?
          And when did they spend billions of dollars to bring those same 90s?
    5. +3
      22 June 2022 18: 53
      Sergei
      In fact, Finland attacked SOVIET RUSSIA-SOVIET UNION FOUR times. And all FOUR times WITHOUT declaring war. And this is in addition to almost monthly armed provocations
      Then, after the defeat, all FOUR times, the Finns, in order to comply with the protocol, were forced to declare war before making peace.
    6. +2
      22 June 2022 21: 22
      Quote: svp67
      And this is said by a representative of a country that TWICE signed humiliating peace agreements for itself after LOSING in military clashes with Russia, in the 20th century.

      In the 2nd century there were:
      The 1st Soviet-Finnish 1918-20, which ended in the Tarut peace, quite victorious for the Finns. Paasikivi then said that Finland's borders under this treaty were too good to last long. But the independence of Finland was completely won
      2nd Soviet-Finnish 1921-22 (Karelian uprising) - attacks from the Finns, which we repelled. And ... nothing, we agreed to tighten border control. But the Finnish rebels and after that, in an informal manner, regularly staged raids on our territory.
      3rd Soviet-Finnish 1939-40 Here - yes, they tensed up and defeated the Finns. But at what cost! The whole world saw in the USSR a "colossus with feet of clay"
      4th Soviet-Finnish. The Finns reached Leningrad and created a lot of problems for us. Already in the 44th year, we demanded unconditional surrender from them, but they refused and still managed to stop the Red Army, albeit on the 3rd line of defense. The result is the refusal of the USSR and the allies from the demands of unconditional surrender and the world is very, very loyal to the Finns. There was nothing humiliating in it, in fact, this agreement can be safely regarded as an honorable surrender of Finland. And this despite the fact that out of more than 64 thousand Soviet prisoners of war who passed through the Finnish concentration camps, according to Finnish data, more than 18 thousand died.
      1. +4
        22 June 2022 21: 53
        The 4th war was in isolation from the Great Patriotic War?
        I wonder how the Hungarians, Romanians, Slovaks and Italians call their military operations on the territory of the USSR?
        First, Second or Third War?
        And in what year did the allies of the USSR declare war on Suomi? In 1941?
        1. 0
          23 June 2022 06: 54
          Quote: hohol95
          The 4th war was in isolation from the Great Patriotic War?

          Do you not know?
          Quote: hohol95
          I wonder how the Hungarians, Romanians, Slovaks and Italians call their military operations on the territory of the USSR?

          I do not care. I listed the armed conflicts of the USSR with the Finns in the 20th century and numbered them. What is the problem?
          1. +2
            23 June 2022 07: 21
            No problem. hi
            For the Finnish side, the 4th is "War Continuation".
            For the USSR, one of the fronts of the Great Patriotic War.
            The United States did not declare war on Suomi at all.
            Churchill "mourned" from the heavy burden of declaring war on December 5, 1941.
      2. +2
        22 June 2022 22: 24
        What kind of stupid nonsense? In 44, in order not to fall under the occupation, the Finns signed a series of humiliating treaties. Including pledged to expel the Germans and agreed to a military base on Finnish territory. Is it called stopped?
        1. +2
          23 June 2022 07: 13
          Quote: Nickelium
          Is it called stopped?

          That's exactly what it's called. During the Vyborg-Petrozavodsk operation, the Red Army broke into the Finnish defenses and captured Vyborg, and it took 11 days (and not 3,5 months, as in 1939-40), but then the offensive stopped in front of the very strong defensive positions of the Finns. The Finns rejected the Soviet offer of unconditional surrender. Ours again made an attempt to advance, and the battle took place at Tali-Ihantala, in which for 2 weeks our troops failed to break through the enemy’s defenses. Having advanced 10-12 km, units of the Red Army stopped and went on the defensive.
          After that, in fact, peace was concluded.
          Quote: Nickelium
          the Finns signed a series of humiliating treaties

          In fact, the Finns were returned to the pre-war borders (1940) and Petsamo was taken away from them, which can hardly be regarded as a significant humiliation - this, in essence, is a small territorial withdrawal + 300 million dollars in reparations for 6 years. The Finns got off VERY lightly.
          Quote: Nickelium
          agreed to a military base on Finnish territory

          They did not agree to a military base, but leased the Porkkala peninsula (which, by the way, we returned to them ahead of schedule in 1956)
          1. 0
            23 June 2022 18: 41
            In fact, they completed their tasks. Why didn't you mention Gangut? This is the very south of Finland and there until July 41 there was a military base of the USSR.
            Ridiculous about rent. Did the Finns have other options? They could calmly squeeze out Lapland and part of Bothnia and the same Aland from them. And the Finns would have wiped themselves off.
            The Finns have been humiliated twice and will be humiliated a third time if they reappear.
            1. +1
              23 June 2022 20: 22
              Quote: Nickelium
              In fact, they completed their tasks.

              How did you write there?
              Quote: Nickelium
              What kind of stupid nonsense?

              This is what he is. We would have fulfilled our tasks if we had broken through the Finnish defenses to the full depth, after which they would have had no choice but to accept any terms of surrender.
              Could we break through the Finnish defenses? Yes, they could. By concentrating the necessary forces and means. But as a result of this, the directions of the main attacks on the Germans would have been weakened, which was unacceptable, since Karelsky was a secondary sector for us. And Stalin, apparently, decided that it was easier to negotiate.
              And agreed. On relatively easy and comfortable conditions for the Finns.
              Quote: Nickelium
              Finns humiliated twice

              Yes, tell this to Finnish overseers of concentration camps for Soviet prisoners of war and the civilian population, and other Finnish collaborators of fascism who committed war crimes, but lived to a ripe old age.
              1. 0
                24 June 2022 17: 25
                Did you just come out of the cave? Stalin considered that we do not need an excessive Finnish territory. Well, if he set the task of going to the Aland Islands, do you really think that they would not have completed it? That Red Army was much stronger than the one that was in the Winter War. And such arguments like "Finns stopped" cause laughter. That Army would go right through from Winnipeg to San Diego, crushing everything in its path.
                1. +1
                  24 June 2022 18: 59
                  Quote: Nickelium
                  And such arguments like "Finns stopped" cause laughter.

                  For illiterate people, no doubt. Because instead of a real historical fact (stopped), idle reasoning begins (yes, we would have them with one left!) Yes, with one left, only "would" interfere. And the Finnish army in this case completed its task
                  If you did not know, then war is a continuation of politics by other means. And the Finnish army created the conditions under which unconditional surrender was replaced by an honorable peace. And the idle reasoning "The Red Army against the Finnish Armed Forces in a spherical vacuum" is on the site of an alternative history.
                  Quote: Nickelium
                  Stalin considered that we do not need an excessive Finnish territory. Well, if he set the task of going to the Aland Islands, do you really think that they would not have completed it?

                  Stalin, unlike you, was well aware that everything has its price. And that he could, of course, capture Finland as a whole and annex it as another republic to the USSR, or achieve its unconditional surrender there, but within the framework of the tasks and priorities that he had, he did not do this. And this is the result achieved by the Finnish army, because if it had not held back our offensive, there would have been unconditional surrender to the Finns
                  1. 0
                    24 June 2022 23: 24
                    Yes Yes. Only those who claim that the Finns have achieved something are illiterate in this case. If the Finns lived like this, then by the good will of the Generalissimo.

                    This is not the result of the Finnish army, because after 44 the Red Army was much stronger and more trained and would not have left a wet place from the Finnish. This result is the good will of Stalin. But apparently he had to crush the Finns before Muonio so that some would not doubt.
                    1. +1
                      25 June 2022 10: 51
                      Quote: Nickelium
                      This is not the result of the Finnish army

                      Whether you like it or not, this is exactly the result. They managed to stop the forces that Stalin singled out against them and thereby mitigated the fate of their country.
                      Quote: Nickelium
                      This result is the good will of Stalin.

                      Which for some reason showed it after an unsuccessful offensive. Not before.
                      1. 0
                        25 June 2022 15: 03
                        No, this is not her result. This is the myth-making of liberals.
                      2. +2
                        25 June 2022 15: 33
                        Quote: Nickelium
                        No, this is not her result. This is the myth-making of liberals.

                        Religious issues are sacred to me laughing
              2. 0
                24 June 2022 17: 26
                Well? The German SS also lived to a ripe old age. Including concentration camp workers.
                1. 0
                  24 June 2022 19: 00
                  Quote: Nickelium
                  German SS also lived to a ripe old age

                  Not all. The instigators and main perpetrators were caught and tried. The same Belzen process to remember.
                  1. 0
                    24 June 2022 23: 17
                    Tried does not mean - executed. In Nuremberg, too, part of them got off with soft terms, while someone was released altogether.
                    1. +1
                      25 June 2022 11: 02
                      Quote: Nickelium
                      Tried does not mean - executed

                      I'm sick of people like this. Not everyone was executed - 100% result is not achieved - so they were going in vain.
                      And to understand that they are being tried for certain crimes, and that some of the defendants might not have committed these crimes, or they did, but they remained unproven, which is why it is impossible to sentence them - these are semitones, how can you! The world is either black or white, and nothing else...
                      At the same Belzen trial, out of 32 defendants, 11 were executed, and the same number received various terms, but 10 people. justified. That is, 11 got what they deserved for sure, and as many more seriously spoiled the rest of their lives. But for you, this is the same as if there were no process, and all these 22 creatures remained alive and at large - not everyone was shot ...
                      1. 0
                        25 June 2022 15: 02
                        Mr. Liberal, criminals, especially fascists, cannot be justified. And there is only one sentence for them - a rope.
                        It's strange that in such a stronghold of democracy as SESA there is such an undemocratic type of execution as an electric chair. Even more I will say - barbaric.
                      2. +3
                        25 June 2022 15: 58
                        Quote: Nickelium
                        Mr. Liberal, criminals, especially fascists, cannot be justified.

                        Sit down, deuce.
                        Firstly, you clumsily jump off a topic that has become uncomfortable for you. Because the refusal to demand unconditional surrender just led to the fact that many Finnish war criminals were left without retribution.
                        Secondly, in itself, membership in the same NSDAP was not and was not qualified as a crime. Tried and hanged only for crimes committed by members of the NSDAP. Simply put, if some youngster joined the Nazis (a member of the NSDAP) and, being drafted into the Wehrmacht, fought in the USSR, he is not a criminal. But if he, being at war, shot prisoners, killed civilians and / or committed war crimes, then he was considered a criminal.
                        And only after the Nuremberg trials, when the NSDAP was banned, did mere entry into it become a crime.
                        Quote: Nickelium
                        It's strange that in such a stronghold of democracy as SESA there is such an undemocratic type of execution as an electric chair.

                        Let's start with a simple one - you do not know either the meaning of the word "liberal" or the meaning of the word "democratic". An execution cannot be democratic or undemocratic, like, for example, a cucumber.
                        As for using the electric chair - well, what can I say? Generally speaking, it was invented precisely in order to make the execution less painful, since the hanged often suffered if the cervical vertebrae did not immediately break. But it often did not occur, since it was necessary to correctly calculate the length of the rope, the knot, and so on and so forth. And before commissioning the execution through electricity, it was tested on animals in many ways.
                        Well, the question is why, after it became obvious that the electric chair causes extreme torment to the convict, it was not canceled - this is a question for the Americans. Is it really so pleasant to watch how, during the execution of the sentence, the saliva in the mouth of the executed boils? I personally have no idea.
                      3. 0
                        25 June 2022 18: 29
                        I'm talking about the officers of the Wehrmacht, because they tried him in Nuremberg. And these officers committed crimes, more than enough to dangle from a rope.
                      4. 0
                        25 June 2022 18: 30
                        Maybe. For example, poison. You fall asleep and don't wake up. And there is a garrote, an electric chair, a gallows.
    7. -4
      22 June 2022 22: 54
      Finland did not sign any humiliating peace agreements after losing in military clashes with the Russian Federation BECAUSE SHE NEVER FIGHTED WITH THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION,
    8. +2
      23 June 2022 10: 22
      Quote: svp67
      And this is said by a representative of a country that TWICE signed humiliating peace agreements for itself after LOSING in military clashes with Russia, in the 20th century

      Considering the size, it is difficult to imagine what kind of agreement following the war with the USSR could be humiliating for Finland.
      Quote: svp67
      So moreover, it is completely obliged to the same Russia for its independence

      If their nobility had come to an agreement in time, including with the Finns, and not dogged in the style of the current "liberal opposition", then Comrade Trotsky, together with Comrade Lenin, could well have been condemned right in the 18th year. So at the expense of who owes whom a long conversation.
      1. 0
        23 June 2022 18: 43
        Given the moderation of the appetites of the Union, the Finns were very lucky. They could take Finnish Karelia and Lapland.
        1. 0
          23 June 2022 19: 37
          What and from whom the moderate Soviet Union could take away is a long and difficult conversation.
          1. 0
            24 June 2022 17: 29
            Why long? Part of East Prussia, Transcarpathia and previously owned territories such as the Kuriles, South Bessarabia returned. Is that a lot for such a colossus?
  3. +15
    22 June 2022 17: 31
    They will not rock the boat and will not have to fight. Let them sit on the priest exactly and Russia will not be interested.
    1. +2
      22 June 2022 17: 48
      They will not be interested until they join NATO.
  4. +5
    22 June 2022 17: 31
    But who is this flea? They seem to have forgotten the last lesson they learned when they lost an important part of their territory.
    1. -6
      22 June 2022 18: 12
      Looks like they forgot the last lesson they learned

      It seems that we have forgotten the lessons that the Finns gave us. And they are bloody right up to the 44th year.
      1. +1
        22 June 2022 18: 56
        They got out of the war in time, otherwise I think there would have been completely different borders.
  5. +8
    22 June 2022 17: 32
    Oh, the hot Finnish guy got angry .. How many people are there in dry land? How many soldiers are in the army? Looks like Zelensky gave him his powder
    1. +1
      22 June 2022 17: 49
      They were bitten by one evil and contagious flea. Not otherwise.
    2. +1
      23 June 2022 10: 31
      Quote: Andrey VOV
      How many people are in dry land? How many soldiers are in the army?

      Very serious guys, almost no clowns. Army plus stock of the first stage under a million. One of the most armed countries in the world. TerO with plywood machine guns will not be there.
  6. +10
    22 June 2022 17: 35
    Ukraine is too tough? As long as they chew well. In vain he put Finnland with Ukraine on a par. The omen is bad.
    1. +7
      22 June 2022 17: 46
      Well, they don’t understand in Europe that when two Slavs butt each other, it’s better not to get involved ... Especially not to threaten. We will beat each other's faces, and then we will turn around and together we will pile on the one who climbs.
      From this it follows that, well, there is no Ukraine and Russia. There are Slavs, who, as at the beginning of the 20th century, were again pushed against the foreheads of Europolitics. 20 years will pass and again the Slavs will pass through Europe?! Well, history doesn't teach you there. Not Finns, not Chekhovs, not Troy-Baltic Chukhons.
      The unfinished Crusons pulled up.
  7. +12
    22 June 2022 17: 35
    Speaking about the conflict in Ukraine, Kivinen stressed that his country was preparing for just such a scenario. Therefore, as he put it, Finland is ready to fight with Russia in case of its attack.

    This is what the pathological humanism shown by us in Ukraine leads to. The "strange war" can only lead to more escalation. Every mongrel is now ready to bark at Russia.
    1. +5
      22 June 2022 18: 16
      If not fools, then they should understand that it can only be "strange" in relation to Ukraine. Let the rest not be deceived. Everything will be adult.
  8. +12
    22 June 2022 17: 36
    When our people start making statements like this with a serious look - we are ready to resist the Finnish aggression and we will defend ourselves! I would take Konashenkov (for example) and say: we are aware of Finland's aggressive plans for revenge for 39 years and we are ready for defense and will not give up a single piece of our land and use all available weapons, including ... and everywhere to say - you are aggressors, you are preparing to unleash a war instigated by the UWB, coupled with the Baltic States and Poland
    1. 0
      23 June 2022 18: 44
      Well, no one will feel sorry for the Finns.
  9. +7
    22 June 2022 17: 38
    Finnish Defense Minister: We are ready to fight Russia if it attacks

    Another mutt under the fence barked! fellow lol
    Durik, why would Russia attack you? belay fool
    Vodka think for you sorry? So no, at least drown in it, it’s not a pity at all. request lol
    1. +3
      22 June 2022 18: 10
      Quote: K-50
      Vodka think for you sorry?

      By the way! Have they blocked trips to St. Petersburg or Vyborg for the weekend?
      1. +1
        23 June 2022 01: 17
        And trips to St. Petersburg or Vyborg were blocked for the weekend?

        No. Fuel in canisters blocked themselves
  10. +1
    22 June 2022 17: 38
    Come on, sleep tribute about nuclear weapons, timo! Let's see how soon you choke on your own words.
  11. +5
    22 June 2022 17: 39
    A hot Finnish guy was looking at the map. Three areas of 1 people each. Approximately. You can consider this map in different ways!
    1. +2
      22 June 2022 17: 52
      The Finns are clustered near our border.
      So that they can travel far to us. laughing
  12. +8
    22 June 2022 17: 42
    Therefore, as he put it, Finland is ready to fight with Russia in case of its attack.


    According to Timo Kivinen, Finland is going to fight with Russia, not Russia with Finland. This is even too much for the Finns, well, really like the new Mannerheim.
    1. +4
      22 June 2022 17: 53
      Quote: tihonmarine
      According to Timo Kivinen, Finland is going to fight with Russia, not Russia with Finland. It's too much even for the Finns

      Carefully noted. He himself said that he had been preparing for a long time.
      1. +2
        22 June 2022 19: 09
        Quote: Alex777
        He himself said that he had been preparing for a long time.

        Timo forgot to filter the market.
        1. +3
          22 June 2022 19: 46
          Quote: tihonmarine
          Timo forgot to filter the market.

          And you won't slip through unnoticed... drinks
    2. +1
      22 June 2022 19: 03
      Vlad
      In fact, Manerheim was a warrior and, after the defeat in 1944, in every possible way denied that he was the head of Finland.
      Then in Finland *steered* Svinhund.
      The surname of which can be translated as - "Swedish dog", since even today the Swedes call their country - "Svinska", but hund - "dog".
  13. AML
    +6
    22 June 2022 17: 42
    Okay Sweden, but what is Finland for? She lived in clover having contracts with both the Russian Federation and the EU. What are they crazy about? There would be some mutual claims that I can’t eat straight, well + - understandable. And so what?
    1. +3
      22 June 2022 19: 38
      Quote: AML
      What are they crazy about?

      Yes, the entire government is pro-state, what do you want from them.
  14. +2
    22 June 2022 17: 42
    Until 1918 - Finland (Chukhonians) was part of Russia .... History - develops in a spiral and has a cyclical nature.
  15. +4
    22 June 2022 17: 43
    Here is the prowess! Bravo! How cool it is to be so brave when there is no risk of being beaten)) The Finns do not catch up with one thing - when (and if) they join NATO, in principle there will be no conventional war, there will be a nuclear war. And here the brave Finnish soldiers will have to fight with physics, chemistry and physiology, here personal moral qualities will play a minimal role. And you want everything to be as before after such a turn of events, but it will not be. This tin soldier is the first to put a bullet in his temple when he finds out that in a couple of seconds his homeland has become a lunar landscape with a full set of short-lived isotopes to a heap.
    1. +1
      23 June 2022 10: 37
      Quote: Knell Wardenheart
      The Finns are not catching up with one thing - when (and if) they join NATO, in principle there will be no conventional war, there will be a nuclear war

      Do you mean that the Finns need their own nuclear weapons? Basically, it's reasonable. Moreover, now several countries are interested in this issue, we can share the costs. Poland, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam. Finns + Poles have money even without Asians comparable to Israel, and Jews have a full-fledged nuclear triad a long time ago.
  16. +1
    22 June 2022 17: 44
    Finland is not Ukraine and Russians do not live in it. Therefore, no one will "smoke one by one" of local Nazis hiding behind the civilian population. And no one will think that after the war everything will have to be restored. They will simply burn out part of Finland with Pinocchio and Solntsepekom. Well, the remaining Finns will again become Russia's "best friends" for 50 years.
  17. +2
    22 June 2022 17: 45
    Finland is ready to fight with Russia

    They just want Russia to attack, so that later they take it for maintenance ...
    They think that we will fight like pigs, there will no longer be pinpoint strikes, but will be crushed as much as possible ..
    1. 0
      23 June 2022 10: 40
      Quote: Ilnur
      Russia attacked, so that later it would take care of ...

      Whom, Finns?
      Have you ever been abroad at all?
      1. 0
        25 June 2022 09: 17
        have you ever been at all?

        and what did you mean by that? That life is better there, I didn’t notice, we have the same thing. But due to what their level is better, which you probably wanted to emphasize to me, it’s better at the expense of Russia and other countries, due to the fact that they lived by selling their candy wrappers for real resources. Let's look further at their standard of living, after the time of cheap resources is over...
        I will not list the country where I was. But I haven’t been to Africa, except for the island next to Tunisia.
        1. 0
          25 June 2022 09: 34
          Quote: Ilnur
          That life is better there, I didn’t notice, we have the same thing.

          Same? Do the inhabitants of Kotka want the Russians to do what they did in Vyborg?

          Somehow the trolls are lazy.
          1. 0
            25 June 2022 12: 12
            well, live there, I feel good in Russia, I love Russia ...

            I found out that I
            There is a huge family:
            And the path, and the woods,
            In the field - every spikelet!
            River, blue sky
            This is all mine, dear.
            This is my motherland!
            I love all in the world!

            And you go to Africa, blacks live there
  18. +2
    22 June 2022 17: 46
    what do they smoke there?
  19. +4
    22 June 2022 17: 46
    We are ready to fight with Russia in case of its attack

    We would have broken into them if they had caught up with us ... inspired, sorry feel
  20. Hog
    +4
    22 June 2022 17: 46
    Just wondering, but who told him that in which case the scenario would be exactly like this ???
  21. 0
    22 June 2022 17: 51
    A logical statement, all of Europe supplies weapons to Ukraine - they swallowed it, some lousy Baltic limitrophes wipe their feet on Russia - they swallowed it, they stole money and property from Russia in Western countries - they swallowed it, there will be more ....
    1. +3
      22 June 2022 18: 08
      What is "regular"?
  22. +1
    22 June 2022 17: 52
    Here, here - what I said about the kid in the previous articles, then it becomes the truth.
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. +1
    22 June 2022 17: 57
    and if they don’t take NATO, will you answer for the bazaar?
  25. 0
    22 June 2022 17: 59
    Drunkard. Forbid him weekend tours to Vyborg
  26. -1
    22 June 2022 18: 01
    Ukraine is too tough for Russia, like Finland

    Well, the Finns howled .. They didn’t live in peace, they wanted to feel like Natu .. Now barking will stand from their border, etc. How tired of all this already!
  27. -2
    22 June 2022 18: 03
    This is where humanism leads to war! to the fact that others think if they don’t beat, then they can’t, which means they are weak !!!! which means that we want to do with the Russian Federation! Lithuania already seems to want to cut off gas for Kaliningrad! in the era of inform war, one cannot show weakness in front of the enemy! they feed their people with this that the Russian Federation is weak, it doesn’t do anything, etc., etc.!
    1. 0
      23 June 2022 18: 46
      It ended badly for the Austrian artist. You always need to have a sober head. Otherwise, you will get your complete defeat and liquidation.
  28. +1
    22 June 2022 18: 04
    And let him learn Russian. Come in handy. And "Valio" cooks.
  29. +2
    22 June 2022 18: 06
    Are the dates a new Mannerheim line built that are so bold? History has taught them nothing.
  30. +1
    22 June 2022 18: 06
    Such statements are a good indicator of their assessment of the likely outcome of the confrontation.
    So, we have no reason to laugh.
    1. -2
      22 June 2022 18: 40
      Such statements are an indicator of hysteria ...
      1. +1
        22 June 2022 18: 53
        The hysteria would be justified if someone threatened them.
        And this is the desire to show the owner his usefulness, without risking anything.
        1. 0
          22 June 2022 19: 01
          The hysteria is quite justified: Russia, with just a part of its conventional forces, grinds the largest country in Europe with a population of 40 million into minced meat, despite the military-technical, informational and financial support of 60 of the richest states in the world ...
          From this, indeed, in a country of 5 million people, you can fall into hysterics ....
          1. +1
            22 June 2022 19: 14
            It cannot be said that it grinds so directly, the enemy quite snaps at himself, hits already on the rear, including thanks to that very support.
            At the same time, it is unlikely that it will be possible to allocate much more for this theater - the border is huge, and all in "friends" as in burdocks. So nothing threatens Finland at all, hence such courage.
            1. +2
              22 June 2022 19: 21
              And he snaps, and hits the rear - but he is ground into minced meat ....
              You can allocate many times more, but they won’t, because the case promises to be long ....
              So Finland and Sweden went "for themselves" ....
  31. 0
    22 June 2022 18: 06
    "Finland is too tough for Russia," said the Minister of Defense of Finland and .... went to join NATO ....
  32. +3
    22 June 2022 18: 09
    Oh fool! (With)
  33. -1
    22 June 2022 18: 11
    And now they are ready again. Everything is repeated, only with different technologies.
    What they are ready for - they themselves do not know, but they declared their readiness! ... To a nuclear strike maybe? So there is nothing to fight back! smile
  34. +3
    22 June 2022 18: 20
    you can conduct a survey - will OTAN sign up to fight "for Lithuania", namely to fight? Lithuania is a member, after all. Finland is not a member. And why should the Russian Federation fight with Finland? this "Hercules" did not explain? Unfortunately for such fighting Finns, a new winter war will not work, and the "motivated" die under missiles at the same speed as the "unmotivated". NWO lessons
  35. 0
    22 June 2022 18: 20
    Finnish Defense Minister: We are ready to fight Russia if it attacks

    So little, just "a little bit", the title has been redone
    Finland is ready to fight Russia if attacked - defense chief

    Finns will be motivated to resist
    "The most important line of defense is between the ears (intricately: in the heads), as the war in Ukraine shows at the moment," Kivinen said in an interview.
    Some 82% of respondents in a Defense Ministry poll on May 18 said they would be willing to participate in national defense if Finland was attacked.
    During the two wars, the Finns lost about 100 thousand soldiers and a tenth of their territory.

    Yes. But the USSR also paid with many lives of soldiers. Very many. Although before the USSR no one stormed the fortified area in such a fierce winter and in such snow.
    1. +1
      22 June 2022 20: 35
      Quote from TreeSmall
      Finnish Defense Minister: We are ready to fight Russia if it attacks

      So little, just "a little bit", the title has been redone

      Finland is ready to fight Russia if attacked - defense chief


      TreeSmall, I did not see any difference in translation from English - explain?

      Literally: "Finland is ready to fight Russia if [it is] attacked [by Russia?]."

      Maybe he spoke differently in Finnish?
      1. +1
        22 June 2022 21: 52
        Google/Yandex Translator?
        "Finland is READY TO RESPOND TO RUSSIA, in case of its attack"
        The semantic load is quite different.
        Fight should be BATTLE.
        "it is more like fighting"
        "it is making a battle".
        “Fight for your homeland” is not the same as “fighting with some country”
        / maybe I'm nitpicking, but it seems significant to me /
        No, of course not in Finnish. No.
        Although the interview was also taken by the ethnic Finn Anne Kauranen, but (!) for Reuters, and edited by Gwladys Fouche and Angus MacSwan.
        These two Finnish people definitely don’t fluff, and the interview was not for domestic consumption.
        1. +2
          22 June 2022 22: 15
          Quote from TreeSmall
          Google/Yandex Translator?

          No, the phrase is simple - translated without a dictionary. To fight back, like - "fight back", "resist". I will not argue - my English does not allow to talk on political and diplomatic topics. hi
          1. 0
            22 June 2022 22: 43
            And I'm not a carrier, but my eyes hurt. I know how they say, all the more such a position (this is not Psaki, which is like urine off a goose).
            My doubts were confirmed by the youngest child (synchronously can translate films). I threw it in for verification: a Finn, a Latvian and an American). I think I'm right.
            Yet the difference here is greater than between "scout" and "spy".
            1. +2
              22 June 2022 22: 52
              As a foreigner, I would use the word "fight" for fighting and "resist" for defending. It is necessary to ask Boltorez - he lives in that environment.
              1. -1
                22 June 2022 23: 01
                "Bolton" it sounds!
                Ask. This is interesting .. But, it seems to me, my version is the most correct.
                1. 0
                  22 June 2022 23: 15
                  I don't know how to search forum members. If Boltorez reads our correspondence, maybe he will answer.

                  PS I found it, now I'll ask you to go to this news in a personal.
                  1. -1
                    22 June 2022 23: 45
                    What is a "lichke"? recourse
                    "bolt cutter" - so he wrote. Corrector in the phone pepekosyachil
                    1. 0
                      22 June 2022 23: 53
                      Quote from TreeSmall
                      What is a "lichke"?

                      If you enter someone's "profile", you can write a message to your personal mail: first click on the nickname, then on "write a message".
                      1. -1
                        23 June 2022 00: 43
                        Well, yes. So you can't find anyone.
                      2. +1
                        23 June 2022 01: 07
                        Quote from TreeSmall
                        So you can't find anyone.

                        Click on the magnifying glass in the upper right corner, score a nickname in the search. You won’t find it right away, but then the advanced search option is displayed. There you can already search by username.
                      3. 0
                        23 June 2022 01: 22
                        hi
                        Wow. I didn't pay attention


                        Certainly specific. But it speeds up
                      4. 0
                        23 June 2022 01: 29
                        You have 14 notifications of replies to your comments. Yes
                        Already 15 ...
                      5. -1
                        23 June 2022 01: 50

                        I have everything castrated.
                        It is necessary to look for a computer, you see. Does not want to show the rest of the phone.
                        See the cookie again which is not cleaned
                      6. 0
                        23 June 2022 02: 02
                        Quote from TreeSmall
                        The phone does not want to show the rest

                        I don't know how it is on a smartphone. Try deleting notifications about read messages - older ones should appear. Hover your mouse over the cloud - a cross should appear.
                      7. -1
                        23 June 2022 02: 08
                        Some kind of enemy

                        recourse
        2. +2
          22 June 2022 23: 45
          Fight should be BATTLE.
          No, it shouldn't. Everything is translated correctly and the meaning is quite consistent.
          1. -1
            23 June 2022 00: 42
            The Americans, after long discussions (in the spirit of “no one in the room” vs “no one's in the room” (“no one's in the room”), chose my version.
            Spy and scout: washed away also "corresponds"
            1. 0
              23 June 2022 00: 47
              In British English, the word battle is considered archaic and rarely used.
              1. -1
                23 June 2022 01: 08
                Yes... I noticed

                Fight
                Heavy fighting continues in east Ukraine
                1. +1
                  23 June 2022 01: 30
                  Battle of Britain is like a story. Also, if u apply something as a noun and not as a verb.
              2. +1
                23 June 2022 01: 22
                The Germans use only the word "Schranke", although they admit that "Schlagbaum" is also correct, but outdated (from the time when robbers threw a log on the road as a barrier (schlagen - beat, der Baum - tree)).
                1. +1
                  23 June 2022 01: 46
                  I crushed a good topic: and the brain was ventilated in languages
                  Je länger Sie ihn bekämpfen, desto leichter kann er Sie schlagen

                  both in history and site search I learned to use
                  "Bolt cutter" again spotted
                  / and the people sprinkle all of Finland with atomic warheads already in the 3rd circle /

                  belay
                  1. 0
                    23 June 2022 01: 55
                    Quote from TreeSmall
                    people sprinkle all of Finland with atomic warheads already in the 3rd circle

                    Sorry ... crying I like nature there (in summer).
                    1. +1
                      23 June 2022 02: 06
                      "come to us in Kolyma belayto Karelia, of course.
                      The forest still remained, the garbage was cleaned. The road is excellent. You can fish without buying a subscription
  36. +3
    22 June 2022 18: 20
    Finnish Defense Minister: We are ready to fight Russia if it attacks
    Russia threatens Finland? Why fight and why???
  37. 0
    22 June 2022 18: 22
    That's it, my cats. As in the 40th.
  38. 0
    22 June 2022 18: 22
    "We are ready to fight Russia when NATO decides that Russia has attacked."
    Incidentally, "verbal aggression" towards Lithuania is a pretext for the use of nuclear weapons.
  39. +1
    22 June 2022 18: 28
    We have been messing around with Ukraine for a long time. we believe that "brotherly" people live there. I really don’t think that they will be on ceremony with Finland (if anything) .......
    1. 0
      22 June 2022 18: 41
      Kostomuksha, Kandalaksha, Kondopoga...
  40. 0
    22 June 2022 18: 38
    And if Russia does not attack, what then? Will you attack yourself? After all, if you joined NATO, it means you will fight against the Russian Federation in any way.
  41. +1
    22 June 2022 18: 40
    As part of NATO or independently?
    1. 0
      22 June 2022 18: 50
      He reads a piece of paper, it does not answer your question
  42. The comment was deleted.
  43. +1
    22 June 2022 18: 41
    They are all sick in the head there, because this is not 39 - 40, our forests will not run. The Finns will run from our MLRS and Solntsepek. Sit quietly and don't talk nonsense. lol
  44. 0
    22 June 2022 18: 46
    He didn't study history well.
  45. -2
    22 June 2022 18: 47
    It’s enough for us to destroy the entire industry with rockets, and it’s not necessary to enter, die of hunger yourself
  46. +1
    22 June 2022 18: 49
    It is not surprising that Sweden and Finland suddenly immediately wanted to join NATO. This was to be expected after a mediocre start and a CBO. Our neighbors and not only really saw and appreciated what our Russian army is really worth. If she were in western Ukraine and Kyiv in a month, then the Scandinavians would continue to observe the status quo. They would hardly have had any desire to join the North Atlantic bloc. But the helplessness and weakness of the army became obvious to everyone. And the fact that she got bogged down in Ukraine for a long time. So we decided to seize the moment. Nobody is afraid of weak Russia now. Even pitiful Lithuania, which has blocked Kaliningrad for us now.
    1. -1
      22 June 2022 20: 04
      So where is the logic? Like non-poor countries. On the contrary, they could profit from contradictions. The Finns won only f35 for 8.5 billion. so much the Belarusian nuclear power plant costs, and the population is 2 times less.
    2. 0
      23 June 2022 12: 20
      And you didn’t think that the war with the Finns would be conducted in a completely different way than with Ukraine.
  47. 0
    22 June 2022 18: 51
    I don't want to fight with dates. although there are no Mannerheim lines, the guys are tough.
    1. -1
      22 June 2022 18: 56
      Yes, there are beasts in the field banks, they will gnaw their throats for any overpayment
  48. +1
    22 June 2022 18: 52
    How much Russian territory was promised by the USA to the Finns for participation in the war with Russia? Just like that, these would not start to go crazy ... they promised ..
  49. +2
    22 June 2022 18: 55
    And, for some reason, this Finn doesn’t think about why We attack Finland?
    1. -1
      22 June 2022 19: 00
      Thinking is not his prerogative, his task is to voice what is written on a piece of paper under his nose
  50. +1
    22 June 2022 19: 04
    Quote: Sergey39
    And, for some reason, this Finn doesn’t think about why We attack Finland?

    I'm still a strategist, but I see no reason. Helsingfors? it’s easier to roll the tribaltic. I don’t see any reason to go to Europe at the moment. Ukrainians and Moldovans - maybe. but again, I am against the death of our guys, although there is nowhere to go.
  51. +2
    22 June 2022 19: 08
    Finland is ready to fight with Russia if it attacks.

    Chukhon club...What if Russia doesn’t attack? Your brains are completely wasted... You and Mannerheim no longer exist and his line is overgrown with grass... Will you take Vyborg back or will you go back to the Republic of Ingushetia?
    Correctly say:
    Don't do anything good to people and they won't do anything bad to you.
  52. +2
    22 June 2022 19: 17
    To avoid empty conclusions and stupid questions, you need to at least take a look at what Finland has
    Regarding combat aviation, for example.
    Over fifty F/A-18s. Not so old, perhaps with modernization.
    Already serious. Taking into account the network of main and reserve airfields + the possibility of using highways in critical cases.
    But no one knows how many missiles they received, such as airborne missiles for combating air targets, and strike missiles such as the Harpoon anti-ship missiles and the tactical AGM-158.
    Probably hundreds of missiles.
    How long does it take for these missiles to fly to military facilities in St. Petersburg?
    At a low and extremely low altitude, multiplied by the favorable relief of Karelia.
    And these are already very serious things that can cause severe damage to our military infrastructure and ships in the Baltic.
    1. -1
      22 June 2022 19: 28
      The authorities will have to eliminate this threat to our people.
  53. -1
    22 June 2022 19: 38
    Did Zelensky share it with him?
  54. 0
    22 June 2022 20: 26
    Well, what a fool this Timo is. He can't wait to fight. It got really bad.
  55. The comment was deleted.
  56. +1
    22 June 2022 20: 59
    It’s easy to be brave when no one is going to attack you))) However, hot Finnish guys will soon feel the full extent of the deterioration of relations with Russia. One thing is not clear - why do they need it?
  57. 0
    22 June 2022 21: 31
    The entire European bureaucracy is ready to fight with us, but the people are not asked.
  58. 0
    22 June 2022 21: 38
    Quote: Dinar
    By the way, Finnish historians are still prohibited from voicing real losses in the Winter War... so as not to upset ordinary people!

    It has already been announced, according to the Finnish Ministry of Defense... Losses of the parties are 3/1. Typical during an assault on defensive structures.

    And according to Soviet and Russian sources, the losses were 10/1. Therefore, I am inclined to believe the Finns, and never believe our contemporaries and compatriots. They are prone to masochism.
  59. 0
    22 June 2022 22: 59
    And we will also lose to Estonia, although no one knows in what game.
  60. 0
    22 June 2022 23: 00
    How so? If they attack, they are ready to fight! If they don’t attack, the army is not ready to fight! Or is the minister lying or the translators?
  61. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      23 June 2022 18: 57
      Which Mandela is a politician? A terrorist who destroyed the most successful state in Africa.
  62. +1
    23 June 2022 03: 46
    Finland is like a station prostitute who talks, but I definitely won’t give it to the red-haired Vaska.
  63. 0
    23 June 2022 04: 29
    Apparently, Finland will soon have to be denazified
  64. 0
    23 June 2022 07: 15
    Quote from: stirrer
    Well, it turned out easier with the Germans, they themselves quickly built all sorts of Stasi dictatorships, ours had to build a wall there just for “little things”, so that from a happy socialist. block did not run away to the "animal" west. With the Finns, probably (since the Soviet Union did not decide on occupation), this would not have happened, they would have to constantly be forced to love the socialist system, and this could also have a corrupting effect on the Soviet army itself. I have a relative from the Tomsk village who served in the GDR and, in fact, returned from the army as a “dissident” and brought so much “anti-Sovietism”.

    But my relatives (two) did not become anti-Soviet after serving in the GDR. Moreover, one of them served there not for 2 years, but for 6 years, as an officer.
  65. +1
    23 June 2022 07: 44
    Finnish Defense Minister: We are ready to fight Russia if it attacks

    Peaceful coexistence suddenly ceased to suit them and they invented an enemy.
  66. 0
    23 June 2022 10: 00
    We have to work off American money!!!! This hot Finnish guy, like the others, thinks the West will help them, especially the Yankees. Perhaps he remembered the Soviet-Finnish war and the Manerheim line, and thinks that the war will be fought according to those patterns of the Red Army.... lol
  67. 0
    23 June 2022 10: 54
    Another clown has appeared, and Moska decides to bark at the elephant before he notices her. Well, purely children. Who needs you? Russia has plenty of land, Finland has no resources, industry is scanty, the location is not so great, a piece of land no one needs.
  68. The comment was deleted.
  69. 0
    23 June 2022 12: 12
    Would a normal general make such belligerent statements? Only .
  70. 0
    23 June 2022 12: 16
    We are ready to fight with Russia in the event of an attack for 2 days.
  71. +1
    23 June 2022 13: 18
    Strange general....once upon a time there lived and suddenly, damn it, we are ready for war with the aggressor Russia?!?!
    Overheated in the sauna?!
  72. 0
    23 June 2022 15: 50
    I do not understand.
    Why should Russia fight Finland now?
    They're not even in NATO
    While not in NATO, there is no particular threat.
    Why should we go there?
  73. 0
    23 June 2022 20: 43
    Something happened, or one of two things. Either they won’t have time to come to war, or we don’t fucking need them. From the word - absolutely.