Rostec has created a stealth glass with improved performance

47


Specialists from the state corporation "Rostec" said that they have finalized the method of manufacturing stealth glass. Now the cockpit canopy of the "stealth aircraft" will receive improved characteristics that directly affect the combat potential and survivability of the winged vehicle.



The development belongs to engineers from ONPP "Technology" named after. A.G. Romashina (part of Rostec). It is reported that the new technology will reduce the radar visibility of the aviation complex and at the same time improve the optical characteristics, which just affect the survival rate, as well as the combat potential of the “stealth aircraft”.

According to Vladimir Artyakov, Deputy General Director of Rostec State Corporation, the first samples of stealth glass made on modernized equipment fully confirmed the design parameters.

As for the technology itself, it consists in using the thinnest films of metals and metal oxides deposited on the glass surface by magnetron sputtering in a vacuum installation. The latter, after refinement, makes it possible to deposit films with a significantly lower surface resistance due to an increase in the peak value of magnetron sputtering by more than 3 times. At least that's what the experts said.

Based on the data obtained during measurements and testing, the new stealth glass manufacturing technology makes it possible to improve the performance of aircraft cockpit glazing in terms of stealth by 20%.
47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    24 March 2022 17: 19
    It's good that our military technology does not stand still. Look what useful breakthroughs in hypersound and missile weapons are helping us now. All the same, I am glad that, apparently, the "brain drain" has stopped and our scientific and technological revolutions are being implemented in products and products.
    1. +5
      24 March 2022 17: 39
      It would be necessary to actively use the achievements in the civil sector and earn money.
      1. +6
        24 March 2022 18: 08
        Quote from ARIONkrsk
        It would be necessary to actively use the achievements in the civil sector and earn money.

        Exactly!!! Lubricated the car with paste and not a single camera sees wassat
        1. 0
          24 March 2022 18: 34
          As for the technology itself, it consists in using the thinnest films of metals and metal oxides deposited on the glass surface by magnetron sputtering in a vacuum installation. The latter, after refinement, makes it possible to deposit films with a significantly lower surface resistance due to an increase in the peak value of magnetron sputtering by more than 3 times.

          Once they told the technology, it means they patented it, not classified it
          And that means the Chinese will get it too.
          What will not be superfluous at all for confronting the Americans who have gone off the coil
          1. -2
            24 March 2022 18: 38
            Quote: Shurik70
            Once they told the technology, it means they patented it, not classified it

            Mdya, I'm wondering what education do you have? No offense! If you call what you quoted "told the technology"
            1. +2
              24 March 2022 18: 43
              Quote: NDR-791
              Mdya, I'm wondering what education do you have? No offense! If you call what you quoted "told the technology"

              That's the gist of it.
              It's like enriching uranium. There were only two countries with nuclear weapons, and then it got into the media that uranium was enriched in centrifuges. It seems that they did not reveal special secrets, but many were able to reproduce this technology by typing.
              1. 0
                24 March 2022 18: 55
                Quote: Shurik70
                It seems that they did not reveal special secrets, but by typing this technology many have been able to reproduce.

                Uh.. sorry. Who is this many??? USSR-India, USA-Pakistan, USA-Britain, USSR-China-DPRK, USA-Israel, Israel-South Africa (could not repeat the equipment). The ways of technology transfer are inscrutable. Iran is also aware, and there seems to be a centrifuge, and where is the Iranian bomb ???
                1. 0
                  24 March 2022 19: 02
                  Iran and North Korea independently mastered.
                  Yes, and Israel is in question
                  And the Iranian bomb - the Israeli intelligence agencies are too effective.
                  And Israel would not have demanded with such maniacal persistence to unleash a full-fledged war against it, if it had not known that Iran had the technology - many people want to wipe Israel off the face of the Earth, but Israel's number 1 enemy is Iran.
                  1. -4
                    24 March 2022 19: 06
                    Quote: Shurik70
                    And the Iranian bomb - the Israeli intelligence agencies are too effective.

                    Are you kidding? wassat In any case, it took Israel 30 years for this, and Iran 60+.
                  2. 0
                    25 March 2022 00: 10
                    Yes, and Israel is in question

                    Israel once again helped France.
                2. 0
                  25 March 2022 00: 09
                  You forgot to add France to the list.
          2. +5
            24 March 2022 18: 55
            Articles from 2016:

            "Glass for the cockpit T-50"
            https://bmpd.livejournal.com/1897837.html

            "Su-57: cockpit glass is stronger than steel"
            https://aviation21.ru/3246-2/

            "Technology for the glazing of T-50 aircraft"
            http://integral-russia.ru/2016/07/29/tehnologiya-po-ostekleniyu-samoletov-t-50/
            1. +2
              24 March 2022 22: 20
              These are just technologies of "coated optics" or glass (including organic). Known for a long time , used to coat optical lenses for binoculars , spyglasses , telescopes and ... spectacle lenses . Many who wear eyeglasses with more or less decent lenses are familiar with these coatings, they give a "metallic" residual reflection on the lens, while being more transparent and scratch resistant. Look at your glasses, if the lenses are polymer and coated, you will see a residual reflection of green, blue (purple), gold or even (yes) burgundy red (there are some). I have a greenish reflex on some glasses, these are German "Rodenstock" lenses. On others, the reflex is violet-blue, these are the French "Esilor". The coating is usually multi-layered, the better the materials and the more perfect the technical process, the more resistant the coating. And yes - it reflects EMP, as it should be with a metallized coating. That is why the lantern does not let EMP through and the internal elements of the cabin, reflecting the electromagnetic wave, do not unmask the aircraft as it would be without it. In most countries of the world, all cabins have long been covered with such a coating. And for some, even the material / coating of the cabin is photochromic - it darkens in the sun and brightens in the shade. Probably noticed? The plane takes off in the bright sun, and its cockpit is dark, like tinted, and it also gives a green glow (or gold) ... and lands when the cloud covers the sun - the lantern is transparent.

              It's just that in the Russian Federation they have apparently learned how to make high-quality coatings. And this is good .
          3. -2
            24 March 2022 19: 10
            Once they told the technology, it means they patented it, not classified it

            How simple everything is for you... but what about the magic of the 80 level - without it, often nowhere, and no one is told about it! winked
          4. 0
            25 March 2022 04: 43
            And the Chinese are already, still on the J-20. And they have a non-binding lantern.
            A similar glass was on the commemorative F-117.
            1. +1
              25 March 2022 13: 46
              Quote: 3danimal
              And the Chinese are already, still on the J-20. And they have a non-binding lantern.
              And what are its advantages over the design that we have?
              The fact that the junction can give additional illumination on the radar is not at all a fact (the binding can be made of composites, which does not give illumination, etc.).

              On the F-22, there is no binding on the lantern, but the later F-35 already has it again -
              lost technology? Or is he still needed for some reason?
              1. +1
                25 March 2022 15: 36
                The fact that the junction can give additional illumination on the radar

                Exactly. On the Su-57, the binding is clearly not composite, as evidenced by the rivets.
                At worst, make the sawtooth edges of the lantern, like the F-117.
                Similarly, with the doors of the weapon compartments.
                lost technology?

                Look at the design of the F-35 lantern: glass whole, the internal composite arc is used only to strengthen it and as part of the ejection system through flashlight (which is not reset).
                Everything has been studied smile :
                https://forum.militaryparitet.com/viewtopic.php?id=16960

                Let me remind you that a one-piece teardrop-shaped lantern was used on the F-16.
                Whereas there was no such solution on any Soviet / Russian aircraft.
                The Chinese, however, were able to repeat.
                Of the undoubted advantages - a great review in close combat. It is strange that they did not try to implement a similar solution on a super-maneuverable fighter, visibility on the Su-57 became even slightly worse than on the Su-35:

                1. 0
                  25 March 2022 16: 08
                  Quote: 3danimal
                  On the Su-57, the binding is clearly not composite, as evidenced by the rivets.
                  What do you think the color yellow stands for?

                  Quote: 3danimal
                  It is strange that they did not try to implement a similar solution on a super-maneuverable fighter, visibility on the Su-57 became even slightly worse than on the Su-35:
                  And what hinders the review?
                  For comparison, F-35
                  1. +1
                    25 March 2022 16: 34
                    What do you think the color yellow stands for?

                    Can't say for sure, but:
                    according to the chief designer A. Davidenko, by weight, composite materials make up 25% of the weight of an empty aircraft, and 70% by surface area.

                    The parts highlighted in yellow in your diagram clearly do not make up 70% of the airframe area.
                    And what hinders the review?

                    Compare with Su-35:

                    For comparison, F-35

                    And I didn’t compare it with the F-35 (by the way, it has a 360 'view from external cameras), it was about super-maneuverable fighters with OVT: Su-35, F-22.
              2. +1
                25 March 2022 16: 09
                One more thing: the Su-57 has a glass lantern, so you can’t do without binding. Perhaps the reason for this choice is the lack of a number of technologies.
                On F-22, F-35, J-20 - polycarbonate, polyacryl, the last two are reinforced from the inside with carbon-fiber (radio-transparent) arcs.
                Let me remind you that the flashlight must withstand a collision with a bird at a speed of about 800 km / h.
                1. 0
                  25 March 2022 16: 37
                  Quote: 3danimal
                  Perhaps the reason for this choice is the lack of a number of technologies.

                  About forty years ago, NITS specialists developed the technology of deep bending, when several layers of glass are placed in a special furnace and for several hours at high temperature under its own weight it bends, acquiring the desired shape and curvature. If necessary, special mechanisms push the workpiece, forcing it to bend according to a special schedule.
                  By this technology on the MiG-29 fighter, the canopy, which previously consisted of three glasses, was replaced with one non-binding silicate glass.
                  https://aviation21.ru/3246-2/
                  That is, we could make unbinding lanterns from silicate 40 years ago.

                  Quote: 3danimal
                  Let me remind you that the flashlight must withstand a collision with a bird at a speed of about 800 km / h.
                  In terms of durability, he's okay. An example of a Tu-204 (I don't think the requirements are lower on a military aircraft):
                  "... With the thickness of the glass in the Tu-204 aircraft - 17 mm, and in the Boeing 787 - 45 mm, the passenger Tupolev can withstand a bird impact speed of 660 km / h, and the Dreamliner - 648 km / h .... "
                  ".... A few years ago, in order to prove the high strength of silicate glass, glass nails were made at the institute. They were hammered. They could be used in products with antimagnetic properties. These nails were also tested instead of clamps when gluing yacht hulls. But the nails remained only exotic ...." The link is the same.
                  1. +1
                    25 March 2022 16: 46
                    That is, we could make unbinding lanterns from silicate 40 years ago.

                    Show at least one photo of the MiG-29 with a one-piece non-binding flashlight request
                    He's okay with strength.

                    I talked about the fact that they could not make a solid silicate (“glass”) lamp of sufficient strength (moreover, it is variable, it is the front part that must withstand a collision), so I had to make it out of two parts.
        2. +1
          24 March 2022 18: 44
          Pasta GOI, if I understand correctly ?. So it's just polish. lol
    2. -1
      24 March 2022 17: 43
      There are always a lot of Kulibins in Russia. But nanochubais with its nano-cutting of the mega-nano budget in Nanoskolkovo did not allow the creative potential of engineers and designers to be realized. We need a government program to support innovation, we need venture funds. Stalin coped with this task, including with the help of sharashkas. Grabin in 1941 designed and launched an artillery gun into serial production in 38 days. And now? In 2006, I designed a video recorder for a car in a garage, when there was not a single imported one on the market. Well, what's the point?
      1. 0
        24 March 2022 18: 08
        Quote: Bearded
        But nanochubais with its nano-cutting of the mega-nano budget in Nanoskolkovo did not allow the creative potential of engineers and designers to be realized.

        He's still a nice little guy. I hope he gets hired by the US State Department.
      2. -2
        24 March 2022 18: 11
        In 2006, I designed a video recorder for a car in a garage, when there was not a single imported one on the market. Well, what's the point?

        Yes, the whole problem of the system is the unwillingness to do something, and the desire to earn money, well, so what did you want? - capitalism is what it is, the goal is the accumulation of resources. And the names at the head of the system ... there is no fundamental difference, as long as this system is capitalism .. But I believe that victory will be ours. soldier fellow
        PS Now the main thing is not to miss the DEG, otherwise they will merge the elections into the toilet
        1. 0
          25 March 2022 02: 10
          And why was television with a helicopter and mobile communications not the first to be mastered in the USSR, despite the technological priority?
          Capitalism didn't seem to interfere...
      3. -1
        24 March 2022 18: 37
        I hope that your dreams will come true and you will be among the first to be locked up in a “sharashka”, where you will work effectively for the good of your homeland, since you cannot be free!
        1. +1
          24 March 2022 18: 45
          Quote: moscowp
          I hope that your dreams will come true and you will be among the first to be locked up in a “sharashka”, where you will work effectively for the good of your homeland, since you cannot be free!

          I do not mind. In a sharashka, I will quickly become an academician. soldier
          1. -2
            24 March 2022 18: 50
            Yeah, "Comrade Stalin, you are a great scientist ..."
            There, competent comrades will figure out who you will become ...)
          2. +1
            24 March 2022 19: 23
            I do not mind. In a sharashka I will quickly become an academic

            You are very arrogant, no one became an academician in a charade, even Tupolev and Korolev became academicians only after they were released from there. This, in my opinion, is terrible, to work under the supervision of the NKVD shnikov.
            There is such a bike (I do not guarantee reliability): in the Tupolevskaya sharazhka they remade the Douglas into the Li-2, they are discussing an auxiliary engine that runs on an electricity generator. Tupolev is speaking, like I don't like this two-stroke engine, let's remake it into a four-stroke. And then the head of the NKVD shnikov decided to show who was in charge there: "How can we immediately remake it into a four-stroke, no, we will remake it into a three-stroke!"
      4. 0
        24 March 2022 19: 12
        I think that those who advocate for them should be driven into charades - let them work under the supervision of guards, and for any miscalculation in design - immediately to the wall! here comes the work!
      5. +2
        25 March 2022 02: 11
        Quote: "In 1930, I was transferred to illegal work in America, where I completed a number of tasks aimed at strengthening the defense power of our homeland. These tasks include work on a diesel aircraft engine. At that time, reports appeared that the company "Packard" carried out a lot of research and practical work on the production of an aircraft diesel engine. Negotiations were underway through Amtorg to purchase this engine. Packard agreed to provide us with technical assistance, but demanded a huge sum for it (almost a million dollars). I was I was instructed to get all the material on this case. Through the work carried out, I acquired not only all the drawings, but also all operational maps for parts and recipes for steel for only a few thousand dollars. The material brought by me was handed over to a commission composed of Charomsky (now Hero of the Socialist Labor) and others to determine its value. The Commission recognized that it is of great value to us."
      6. 0
        25 March 2022 04: 44
        Only Chubais interfered with our geniuses all these years? Or organization of the whole system?

        (From 1:00)
    3. +1
      24 March 2022 18: 37
      It is IMPOSSIBLE to spray the magnetron! This is a crossed diode charge in a strong magnetic field! You can spray using a magnetron, not the magnetron itself!!! fool fool Please fix the text negative
  2. +3
    24 March 2022 17: 20
    I can smell it - the Su-75 will have many surprises ...
    good
    1. +1
      24 March 2022 17: 40
      Time does not stand still. We are also preparing surprises, such as 2DPA-1 material, which is lighter than plastic and harder than steel.
    2. 0
      25 March 2022 04: 53
      And when will he? In the next decade, a piece copy?
  3. +1
    24 March 2022 17: 21
    It's good news that our designers and engineers have created such amazing glass. Now it's up to mass production.
    1. +1
      24 March 2022 18: 11
      Quote: Thought Giant
      Now it's up to mass production.

      The main thing is that the equipment for its production is our production. And then we have trouble with this
      1. +1
        25 March 2022 04: 51
        The problem of the modern world is that not a single developed country has all the sophisticated equipment and components of its own production.
  4. +1
    24 March 2022 17: 35
    It's funny that a phrase flashed in the article after explaining the spraying technology to the author
    At least that's what the experts said. lol
    Our engineers are handsome good
    1. -2
      24 March 2022 18: 48
      Quote from host
      Our engineers are handsome

      I remembered. Somehow our new owner comes, points to the receiver, and asks:
      - And what is it?
      - Alcohol mashine.
      After these words, I was stripped of my brigadiership. sad
      1. +2
        24 March 2022 19: 11
        Quote: mordvin xnumx
        After these words, I was stripped of my brigadiership. sad

        hi Vladimir, be proud!
        as explained by the expert
        It’s much dumber with foreigners, in short: the beginning of the 2000s, location - Western Siberia, subbase, my warehouse > Indonesian engineer Schlumberger Yandu is sad near Toyota for an hour - knocked down 2 puppies, your obedient servant with a slight hangover - Yandu, in a similar situation the Russians flatten the tire and say God, it's not me, the technique failed. After 5-10 min. sitting in the office I hear the rattling of an autopump, h / o 20 min. there is no car. Yes
        1. -1
          24 March 2022 19: 27
          Quote from host
          Quote: mordvin xnumx
          After these words, I was stripped of my brigadiership. sad

          hi Vladimir, be proud!
          as explained by the expert
          It’s much dumber with foreigners, in short: the beginning of the 2000s, location - Western Siberia, subbase, my warehouse > Indonesian engineer Schlumberger Yandu is sad near Toyota for an hour - knocked down 2 puppies, your obedient servant with a slight hangover - Yandu, in a similar situation the Russians flatten the tire and say God, it's not me, the technique failed. After 5-10 min. sitting in the office I hear the rattling of an autopump, h / o 20 min. there is no car. Yes

          Bullshit .... An American is working, his feet are on the table ... A guard comes to him, laughs himself, says a bomb was slipped under the American. The American grabs his daddy and runs. And finally, he asked: "Why are you laughing then?"
  5. -1
    25 March 2022 03: 46
    It would be better if the engine was finally finished ... with improved performance ..
  6. -2
    25 March 2022 04: 39
    Instead of "stealth glass", it would be better to finally create a non-binding lantern. He has been on the F-22 for a long time, even the Chinese on the J-20 (2nd photo) were able to, what's the matter?