The myth of the "birth of the Ukrainian nation" in the Commonwealth

30
The myth of the "birth of the Ukrainian nation" in the Commonwealth

The scene of the Pereyaslav Rada on a postage stamp dedicated to the 300th anniversary of the reunification of Ukraine with Russia. It is worth remembering that there were no “Ukrainians” and “Ukraine” then. There were Russians who lived in the western part of Russia-Russia, Little Russia

Today in Russia there is a popular myth that the Ukrainian ethnos was born in the Commonwealth. During the Polish occupation, the Russians in the southwestern part of Russia were Polonized, and so the "Ukrainians" appeared.

In Ukraine itself, this myth, which became dominant in Soviet historiography (earlier, Russians in Great and Little Russia were not divided into different peoples), have already been discarded. There now dominates the myth that the real Slavs and direct heirs of Kievan Rus (“Rus-Ukraine”) are “Ukrainians”. At the same time, many Ukrainian authors have agreed that the “ancient Ukrainians” are supposedly the most ancient people on the planet, respectively, the “Ukrainian language” is supposedly the parent language of all Indo-European peoples (The adventures of the "ancient proto-Ukrainians").



Western Russia in the XNUMXth - early XNUMXth centuries. was completely Russian


Just enough to take historical sources of the Middle Ages to see that ethnically, culturally and linguistically, the Russian land (Rus) was Russian. Sources do not know any "Ukrainians". The same situation persisted in the XIV-XVI centuries, when Polotsk, Kyiv, Galicia-Volyn, Seversk, Smolensk and other lands fell under the rule of the Polish-Lithuanian feudal lords. In Lithuanian Rus, Russian people still lived with their inherent faith, national mentality, language and culture. The existence of "Ukrainians" in the Commonwealth is a myth.

Until the very end of Galicia-Volyn Russia, its rulers were called "sovereigns of Russia", "kings of Russia", money "Russian coin", "Russian pennies" was minted. Until the beginning of the XNUMXth century, the Galicians considered themselves "Russian-Rusyns". Only large-scale Ukrainization, Polonization of Western Russia, and then the most severe terror, repressions that led to the physical destruction of tens of thousands of Russians and the flight of hundreds of thousands of people who identified themselves with Russia ("History of the destruction of Russian Galicia"), allowed to change the national composition of Galicia. The remaining Russians were "Ukrainized", they had to accept the "Ukrainian chimera".

But even in 100 years it is impossible to create an ethnos-people, this requires much more time. For example, even now there is no American ethnic group, there is a set of completely different racial, national-linguistic, religious and cultural groups that can fall apart at any moment. Enough to destroy the "American dream" and the dominance of the dollar.

Lithuanian Rus and Little Russia


After the capture of part of the lands of the Kiev region by Lithuania, its princes took the title: "Grand Duke of Lithuania, Zhmud and Russian." Lithuania consisted of two-thirds of the Russian lands and the Russian population. The Russian language was the state language, laws were published in it, legal proceedings were conducted, Russians prevailed in the squads and regiments of Lithuania. The statute of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (a collection of fundamental laws) was adopted three times: in 1529, 1566 and 1588 in Russian. Even in the third edition of the Statute, it was prescribed:

“The zemstvo clerk is obliged to write all papers, extracts and draft summonses ... only in Russian and in Russian, in Russian letters and words.”

Governors and elders were supposed to have among their assistants people who knew Russian letters.

Under the last Galician-Volyn princes, the term "Little Russia" appeared. So in Byzantium they began to call Volyn, Galicia, Vladimir-Volyn, Kholm, Przemysl, Lutsk and Turov lands. Over time, the name "Little Russia" (Little Russia) extends to all Russian lands that fell under the rule of Lithuania and Poland. The Polish king Casimir III the Great, having captured Galician Rus, styled himself "King of Lyakhia and Little Russia."

Nothing has changed in the XV-XVI centuries. Russians still lived in Little Russia. Nobody knows about the "Ukrainians" in it. In the book of the Polish Jesuit Piotr Skarga "On the unity of the Church of God" (1577), where a plan was developed to spread the union among the Russians, we read:

“Conferences… with the Russian bishops would help us a lot… If we ourselves were attentive, we would have taken over Russian schools long ago, we would have reviewed all Russian books… so that the Russians themselves can see the truth more clearly.”

Other documents show that during this period there was an expansion of Catholicism, Jesuitism and Polonization. No "Ukrainians" and "Ukrainization". The West is fighting against Russianness, the Russian church, the Russian language. In the message of the Galician-Podolsk laity dated 1583 to Metropolitan Onesiphorus of Kiev we read:

"Our churches are turning into Jesuit ones, and the goodness of the Russian church is being transferred to the Latin ones."

Lviv residents write to Moscow Patriarch Job about the invasion of Catholicism:

“Before, there were no Jesuits in our city, who took possession of many Russian churches.”


Lithuanian Rus - Russian state

The birth of "Ukrainian"


Obviously, the Polish elite was worried about the fact that a huge number of citizens were Russians, and that the Russian state was constantly strengthening and growing near the borders of the Commonwealth. It was necessary to divide Great and Little Russia, to inspire people that another tribe lives outside Russia-Russia. Weaken the Russian kingdom by pitting the Russians against each other.

At the end of the 1587th century, the foundations of the idea that in the future would be called “Ukrainianism” were born in Poland. In the message of the Polish king Sigismund III (1632-1596) to the Pope of XNUMX regarding the church union, we see:

“Under the authority of the Russian metropolitan (of Kiev and Galicia) are vast and most populous regions. In comparison with Russia, the areas of primates of Gaul or Spain are not at all large ... If all of Russia, i.e. Lithuanian Russia, unites with the apostolic throne, this can easily lead to the union of the Grand Duchy of Moscow ... because Muscovites use the same language with Russians in worship , and the spoken language of both these peoples presents only dialectical differences or in the pronunciation of words.

Thus, the so-called. "Muscovites-Muscovites" and their mythical homeland "Muscovy", as "two Russian nationalities" - a Polish invention, supported by the Vatican. In Poland, they began to portray Russians in Little Russia as a completely separate people, the true heirs of Kievan Rus. And the "Muscovites" as the descendants of the Finno-Ugric tribes and the Tatar-Mongols.

The Russians in Little Russia (future "Ukrainians") sought to turn into the "cannon fodder" of Poland in the eternal war between Poland and Russia-Russia. Little Russians became a kind of Janissaries - ethnic outcasts, who were trained to fight the people to which they belonged by blood. The Turks took away children and youths from the Balkan Slavic peoples and raised them in hatred for their relatives. It turned out Ivans, who did not remember kinship, but fiercely hated the enemies of the Sultan and Islam. So the "Ukrainians" by origin, language and faith are Russians, they fiercely hate other Russians and Russia.

It is enough to take historical sources to make sure: there were no “Muscovites” on the territory of Russia. This is a purely Western, artificial term. Russians and their neighbors still call the people on the lands of Vladimir, Moscow and Novgorod Rus - Russians, and the land - Russian, Rus and Russia. Many sources, including modern genetic and anthropological studies, show that in Russia, which the sources call "Great", there were no fundamental, large-scale changes in the population. The Russians have no "Mongol-Tatar" heritage. They retained their racial, linguistic and national identity for many millennia.

"Ukraine" - outskirts


During the XIV-XVI centuries. along with the former name Rus (Russia), new ones appear in the sources to designate two parts of the Russian land. Russian Lithuania, Russian lands under the rule of the Polish queens and the Grand Dukes of Lithuania are called Little Russia, Russia. Northern Russian lands are called Great Russia (Russia). There are no fundamental ethnic changes in Little and Great Russia. Communities of Poles and Jews appear in Little Russian cities. In Great Russia, the Horde (mostly former Polovtsy), racially representatives of the white race, accept Orthodoxy and become Russians almost in the very first generation.

Russians live in both Little and Great Russia. No "Ukrainians" were noted at that time. The dismembered Russian people completely preserved their faith, linguistic, cultural and mental unity. Thus, there were spiritual and material prerequisites for the unification of all Russians into a single state under the rule of their Russian sovereign. Therefore, the Russians of Little Russia in the XNUMXth century began a national liberation war against the Polish religious, national and economic yoke. They rebelled against the policy of de-Russification. Which eventually ended with the liberation and reunification of the Russian lands.

The false concept of the alleged "national liberation struggle of the Ukrainian people" was created much later. There were no "Ukrainians" at that time yet. The Russians - Cossacks, peasants and townspeople - fought against Pan Poland, they were supported by the Russian Church in the person of their best leaders. The Russians defended their will, the right to be themselves, to speak Russian, to go to Russian churches, not wanting to be Polish "claps" - slaves.

Bohdan Khmelnitsky sent out letters that he was going to free the "Russian people" from "Lyash (Polish) captivity." The Polish Hetman Sapieha wrote:

“Against us is not a gang of self-willed, but the great power of the whole of Russia. All Russian people from villages, villages, towns and cities. Bound by bonds of faith and blood with the Cossacks ... "

The very word "Ukraine" was then used in Russian and Polish sources only as a designation for "outskirts". The term was applied to a wide variety of territories that had nothing to do with modern Ukraine. For example, this was the name of the border lands of the Polotsk land, the border lines of Lithuania and Wallachia, the most diverse "Ukraine" (frontier lands) of the Russian state. The Poles at that time by "Ukraine" also meant the border area, the outskirts. In particular, the "Ukraine" of Moscow and Tatar - on the border with Russia and the Wild Field.

Thus, no “Ukrainians” lived in Western (Little) Russia, Russians lived there, just like 300-800 years ago. Russian hetman Bogdan Khmelnitsky began the Russian liberation war, for the liberation of the Russian people from the Polish yoke. The ideology of "Ukrainianism" was only begun to be created by the Polish lords, the Jesuits, in order to split off part of Russia and the Russian people from Great Russia-Russia. They planned to use part of the Russian people as "cannon fodder" - Janissaries. It took a lot of time and control over education to penetrate the ideology of “Ukrainianism” into the masses. Russia, having returned Little Russia to its composition, stopped the process of such Polonization-Ukrainization. This Polish trend was revived among the Ukrainian intelligentsia only in the XNUMXth century.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    15 March 2022 05: 13
    The poisonous fruits of Polonization and Ukranization have sprung up in our time.
  2. +9
    15 March 2022 05: 57
    became dominant in Soviet historiography
    I'm embarrassed to ask - in what place of Soviet historiography was this myth dominant? Does the author have anything to support this assertion? (red mushrooms with white dots - do not offer, they are not proof!)
    1. +2
      16 March 2022 10: 35
      The author took all this from the theory of three P - floor, finger, ceiling.
      1. -2
        17 March 2022 02: 28
        Quote: YOUR
        The author took all this from the theory of three P - floor, finger, ceiling.

        Yes, but when was there something like that, the Ukrainian nation, or maybe just a mistake of time, or maybe history, or just an old fake? But I still don't understand.
  3. +8
    15 March 2022 06: 43
    Fight not with nationality, but with signs of Nazism. Sometimes thoughtlessness does more harm than weapons. On the first channel on March 8, instead of "Queen of the Gas Station", "Turkish Gambit" was shown. Maybe we will remove Gogol from literature? If there is a language, customs, then there is a nationality.
  4. +7
    15 March 2022 07: 15
    Severe aggravation in Samsonov. As it began yesterday, "so the disease is spreading, growing ..."
  5. -11
    15 March 2022 07: 24
    Samsonov, as a person with the classic mentality of the enemies of the communists, throws out from history all the facts that are unfavorable to them.
    Maybe officially there were no Ukrainians, but there were Little Russians, of whom, according to the 1897 census, there were 22 million people in the Russian Empire.
    And they had their own Ukrainian language, not Russian.
    1. 0
      17 March 2022 02: 30
      Quote: tatra
      Samsonov, as a person with the classic mentality of the enemies of the communists, throws out from history all the facts that are unfavorable to them.

      Well .... You really went too far. Like, well, not like that.
  6. +6
    15 March 2022 07: 25
    Extremes: 1. one people 2. Ukrainians are a separate nation. A million times repeated axiom - until the 19th century there were no nations in the modern sense. What happened before the 19th century? Academician Gildenstedt, traveling along the left bank of Little Russia and Slobozhanshchina (1774), clearly divides villages and farms into those predominantly populated by Russians and predominantly populated by Little Russians. The most interesting thing in which the academician sees the difference between Russians and Little Russians is in the peculiarities of life. For example, in the ways of storing grain (Russians - in barns, Little Russians in pits), the use of teams (the first plow on horses, the second - on oxen), etc. They also differed in the ways of taxation and military service. Neither in faith nor in language (and these are the main points of self-identification of the people in the 18th century), the academician did not notice any differences.
  7. -9
    15 March 2022 07: 49
    “ancient Ukrainians” are allegedly the most ancient people on the planet

    Why "supposedly"? laughing
    1. -2
      15 March 2022 14: 47
      Because
      They (Russians) retained their racial, linguistic and national identity for many millennia

      Russians are older.
    2. -2
      17 March 2022 02: 32
      Quote: Luminman
      “ancient Ukrainians” are allegedly the most ancient people on the planet

      Why "supposedly"? laughing

      So there were no shovels at that time, the age is "bronze".
      1. +2
        17 March 2022 07: 24
        So there were no shovels at that time, the age is "bronze"

        They couldn’t even make a bronze shovel - they are the progenitors of all mankind! wink
    3. 0
      23 March 2022 11: 05
      allegedly - because there were no ancient Ukrainians who supposedly dug out the Black Sea and "gave birth" to Jesus Christ. Gogol is a RUSSIAN writer and Taras Bulba is a Russian who fought with the Poles for the RUSSIAN land (read Gogol as a source)
  8. 0
    15 March 2022 08: 22
    Released from the bottle of "genie"
    1. +1
      17 March 2022 16: 24
      Quote: Daniil Konovalenko
      Released from the bottle of "genie"

      They got a guy from near Linz out of the rubble.
  9. -3
    15 March 2022 08: 35
    The article is absolutely correct that the Grand Duchy of Lithuania was part of the Russian territories that were fragmented and not united into one state. These are not Tatar or Siberian khanates, which had to be conquered and lands annexed. With the Lithuanian princes, the Russian princes fought civil strife in the same way as Moscow and Novgorod princes fought civil strife, or the like. There was nothing new in the fact that the Lithuanian VK, introducing himself, uttered the word "Russian" last. There were times when the princes of Vladimir, introducing themselves, said the word "Moscow" last. Even Dmitry Donskoy was called the Prince of Vladimir and Moscow, and not vice versa. Such a system, when every strongest feudal lord had the right to own land and all the people on them, was also common in the then feudal states of Europe. So, present-day Lithuania has nothing in common with the ON.
    As for the name Kievan Rus, two historians came up with it on the teaching of the Poles - Maksimovich and Karamzin. The first was an ardent Polonophile, the second allowed himself to rewrite history to please the Romanovs. That is why other historians were afraid to argue and oppose Karamzin, the anger of the Romanovs could have ruined ...
    But the term "Ukraine" was invented and officially used by Otto von Bismarck. That is why thirty years later Skoropadsky's government was completely pro-German, not because of the situation after WWI and the October Revolution, but because the Germans remembered the old Bismarck project, that by tearing off its outskirts from Russia, which Bismarck called "Ukraine", the only way to destroy Russia...
    Well, under the rule of the communists, what was not, is not and cannot be any Ukraine, but there is
    only Little Russia and Novorossia, it was impossible to even hint at this. From here the question
    so who followed the road of the collapse of Russia, which was once designated by Otto von Bismarck?
    1. +2
      15 March 2022 14: 43
      Talented, he, this Bismarck! For example, in 1648, under the pseudonym "Boplan", he issued a "map of Ukraine" - 167 years before his birth!
      Quote: north 2
      Skoropadsky's government was completely pro-German ... due to the fact that the Germans remembered the old Bismarck project
      - well, yes, the Germans would not have remembered, I would have been for a single and indivisible!

      Quote: north 2
      so who followed the road
      - alternative historians.
      1. -1
        17 March 2022 02: 33
        Quote: Evgen Medenko
        Talented, he, this Bismarck!

        German shit.
    2. 0
      17 March 2022 16: 26
      Quote: north 2
      so you can destroy Russia ...
      Well, under the rule of the communists, what was not, is not and cannot be any Ukraine, but there is
      only Little Russia and Novorossia, it was impossible to even hint at this. From here the question
      so who followed the road of the collapse of Russia, which was once designated by Otto von Bismarck?

      I see that they did not understand you, but they will not understand you. Jumping is easier than thinking.
  10. +3
    15 March 2022 10: 20
    Many sources, including modern genetic and anthropological studies, show that in Russia, which the sources call "Great", there were no fundamental, large-scale changes in the population. The Russians have no "Mongol-Tatar" heritage. They retained their racial, linguistic and national identity for many millennia.

    I won’t say for sure, but somewhere about 10 years ago, probably more, a genetic examination did not reveal the influence of Tatars on Russian genetics. This is a word about scratching a Russian - you will find a Tatar.
  11. 0
    15 March 2022 11: 12
    The Poles simply and unpretentiously robbed everyone in Poland itself and among its neighbors. Especially after the spread of Protestantism in Europe, all raids and robberies were justified - by apostasy from the faith ..
    After the partition of Poland, the Austrians provided an ideological basis for the subsequent assimilation of the provinces, since European values ​​and education made it possible to plunder with ideological overtones. The patchwork empire did this with all * foreigners * who fell under the rule of the Austrians. There is no difference in how the Austrians tried to * digest * Italy, creating new nation-nationalities and how the captured fragments of Poland were mastered.
    The term-Ukrainian has authors.
    The Austrians were not at all shy about how and with what blood they drove *Ukrainianism* into the Svidomites.
  12. 0
    15 March 2022 11: 41
    The Russians in Little Russia (future "Ukrainians") sought to turn into the "cannon fodder" of Poland in the eternal war between Poland and Russia-Russia. Little Russians became a kind of Janissaries

    For more than 400 years, the de-Russification of Little Russia has been going on, and now it does not stop, and even has more success than in the previous four centuries. Even now, the population of Little Russia is needed not only by Poland, but by the entire collective West, like the "Janissaries of the West", like cannon fodder, which they are doing quite successfully in the 21st century, and the West will send them to the slaughterhouse, as Speech sent before The Commonwealth to fight with the brothers, until the last, is no longer a "Little Russian" but a Ukrainian. I would like to believe that they can come to their senses now.
  13. +1
    15 March 2022 13: 06
    Quote: tatra
    And they had their own Ukrainian language, not Russian


    They had a separate dialect (dialect), not a language.
    How the Bavarians had a different dialect from Prussian. But the Bavarians and Prussians are one people, the Germans.
  14. 0
    17 March 2022 02: 35
    Quote: tihonmarine
    I want to believe that maybe now they will come to their senses

    And I myself will answer: "not those people"
  15. +1
    17 March 2022 09: 14
    In general, it was always funny to read about antiquity and some kind of exclusivity of Ukrainians. Russians or the Western Russian people would say, it would be normal
  16. +1
    April 26 2022 13: 17
    Quote: Illanatol
    Quote: tatra
    And they had their own Ukrainian language, not Russian


    They had a separate dialect (dialect), not a language.
    How the Bavarians had a different dialect from Prussian. But the Bavarians and Prussians are one people, the Germans.

    So it's normal if in Germany they teach dialects in schools, and in the USSR they taught "native language". But who belongs to what people, it is up to everyone to decide for himself. If a person believes that he is Ukrainian, then there is such a people.

    It is impossible to convert Russians into Ukrainians, just as it was impossible for Turks to convert Bulgarians into Turks. Jews without a state at all for 2 thousand years have not changed into anyone. Therefore, to admit that the Russians were converted into ukrov means to admit their inferiority.
  17. 0
    April 26 2022 13: 34
    Quote: ivan2022
    Therefore, to admit that the Russians were converted into ukrov means to admit their inferiority

    And it seems that a series of articles by this author gently and implicitly pushes us towards this.
  18. 0
    24 May 2022 05: 25
    in the 60s, my grandmother went on a ticket from the trade union committee of the plant to romania. so she said that there were practically no problems in communicating either in stores or with the locals - very many knew the Russian language. and in Siberia now both the Khanty and Mansi know and they learn Russian, but it’s not known whether they use theirs, I myself worked there for ten years in the 90s, but I didn’t hear it. Even in Europe, they say, there are Russian (Slavic) names. Where did all this go ??? adds, who did it “rebuild” us like that quite recently, where did the children of the Novgorod prince who ruled in western Ukraine go ??? who betrayed and destroyed the entire socialist camp starting from Berlin ??? after all, all by themselves ...
  19. 0
    24 May 2022 09: 49
    Quote: tatra
    And they had their own Ukrainian language, not Russian ...

    belay
    Do not confuse the Little Russian dialect with the chimerical Austro-Polish-French construct.
    An excellent series of articles by the author.