The fate of the admirals of the Russo-Japanese War

32
The fate of the admirals of the Russo-Japanese War

The governor of the Far East, Admiral Alekseev, opens a number of retracted admirals. In 1904, he was 61 years old, viceroy of the emperor, commander-in-chief of land and sea forces in the Far East, he sounded the alarm even before the start of the war, for which he received a short cut from St. Petersburg, because Nikolai Alexandrovich did not want war, and therefore - it should not be . When everything went as it went, Alekseev was first removed from the high command, in June 1905, and from the governorship with an appointment to the State Council, that is, nowhere.

The admiral, who offered to occupy not Port Arthur, but Qingdao, who explored Korean ports and wanted to organize Russian bases in Korea, who strengthened Port Arthur, despite interference from Witte, of course, was awarded, and the St. George Cross of the third degree and the Order of Alexander Nevsky fell on his neck, but they also set aside in fact and from fleet, and from politics. And Witte and contemporaries, in addition, also cheated. Of course, the “good genius Admiral Eugene” was not a genius, he was an authoritarian leader, never a talent, an ordinary workhorse of the Empire. But there was no guilt behind him, except perhaps belonging to the Bezobrazov group, and that out of necessity - the bezobrazovtsy were on horseback, and the choice was - one way or the other. After the defeat, the group was set aside, and the admiral was set aside, the epithets are nothing more than echoes of the political struggle of that era. And the admiral died in May 1917 in Yalta, leaving no descendants and not seeing the future ... fortunately for him.



Vice Admiral Stark


Oscar Viktorovich Stark is an example of a man who was lucky - in 1904, at the age of 58, he reached the peak of his career, commanding the Pacific squadron. There is no particular fault on him for the start of the war - Petersburg demanded not to succumb to provocations, and in the morning a campaign was being prepared, and mine action nets would have interfered with these plans. As a result, three damaged ships and a ready culprit for everything. He had a good first battle, although even here they are accused of not completely defeating the Japanese, having much less strength, but then the admiral was removed from the Far East and in 1905 was appointed senior flagship of the Baltic Fleet. The humor is that there was no fleet left in the Baltic, and Oskar Viktorovich was put in command of an essentially incompetent antiques. And when the fleet began to appear in commercial quantities, then in 1908 the resignation followed.

Then there was the chairmanship of the board of the Obukhovsky and Izhora factories, participation in the White movement and emigration to Finland, where Oscar Viktorovich died in 1928, his sons, all three, became naval officers, participated in the First World War, and the eldest managed to fight under Tsushima on a cruiser Dmitry Donskoy. The reason for the disgrace and resignation is clear and understandable - someone had to be guilty for everything, so the first persons of the fleet were removed. Stark is still lucky on this list, he left the Far East before the really big defeats.

Vice Admiral Skrydlov


At the age of 60, Vice Admiral, hero of the Russian-Turkish War, Nikolai Illarionovich Skrydlov was appointed commander of the Pacific Fleet. He did not have time in Port Arthur before the blockade began, which is often blamed on him, but no one in delirium could have imagined that the army would retreat so quickly and decisively. From Vladivostok, it was only possible to command the FOK, which the admiral did. Everything else is like the ideas of a breakthrough to Port Arthur on a junk, from the category of unheard of things. After the war, Skrydlov returned to St. Petersburg, without really commanding anything (the VOK had Jessen and Bezobrazov, the 2nd squadron had Rozhdestvensky), and in 1906 he became commander of the Black Sea Fleet. He became not just like that - a revolution was burning in the country, and Nikolai Illarionovich was an old honored Black Sea man, respected by sailors. In parallel with the appointment, he received special powers to fight the revolutionary movement, and as soon as it began to decline, he immediately retired, becoming ... an honorary member of the Imperial Russian Water Rescue Society.

However, in civilian life, such professionals were needed, and Skrydlov did not live in poverty:

“He was a member of the Special Committee for the Strengthening of the Navy on Voluntary Donations, Director of the Board of the Shipping and Steamship Society “I. I. Konetsky, member of the Council of Congresses of Shipowners, member of the board of the Russian Far Eastern Industrial Joint Stock Company.

A died in 1918 from a heart attack, becoming involuntarily part of another historical legends:

“After the Bolsheviks announced the policy of the Red Terror, he was taken hostage and on October 4, 1918 was executed. He was buried in his family estate Spas-Beryoza, now the Oleninsky district of the Tver region.

According to the second version, he was drowned in a barge, they didn’t crucify him well and didn’t eat him, and meanwhile his son’s memoirs were published:

“Despite the fact that my father died under the Bolshevik regime, his funeral had some solemnity. Father was in full dress admiral's uniform, the coffin was covered with St. Andrew's flag; an impressive number of sailors followed the coffin. The fleet, I mean the old fleet, which retained enough respect for traditions even in Bolshevized Petrograd, was presented in a funeral procession.

Notes in the press with an obituary of his colleagues have also been preserved.

Vice Admiral Rozhdestvensky


The history of Zinovy ​​​​Petrovich and his biography are probably known to everyone who has come off so far off. It is less known that he is one of the fathers of the Novikov, that he planned the reforms of the fleet, that even Nikolai Romanov was not eager to determine his resignation, knowing full well WHO was the author of the adventure with the Second Pacific Squadron. Nevertheless, both the resignation and the trial were inevitable, which Rozhdestvensky himself understood. When he tried to write his memoirs, nothing came of it - no matter how you write, but the supreme power is to blame for the defeat, so the admiral flew out of service and died quietly on New Year's Eve 1909, guilty without guilt.

Rear Admiral Jessen


The dashing commander of the VOK, Makarov's appointee, certainly had nothing to present, he acted impeccably during operations. But this did not save him from the common fate. First, the commander of the only detachment of ships in the Pacific Ocean is subordinated to the head of the port of Greve, and upon returning at the head of the detachment of ships to the Baltic in 1906, they are reprimanded based on the results of the inspection review of the detachment. The ships that passed through Port Arthur and Tsushima, which were interned in foreign ports, whose crews served every conceivable time, were ill-prepared at the height of the revolution. It sounds like a mockery, especially in terms of the wording:

“in an insufficiently attentive and serious attitude to his duties as the commander of the detachment, who did not set himself the goal of creating an impressive military force from the ships of the detachment entrusted to him.”

True, they nevertheless gave the vice admiral, and finally set him aside in 1908, holding until then the junior flagship of the actually non-existent Baltic Fleet. Then there was fictitious ownership of the shipyard and death in 1918. The fate of Greve, appointed to command a military admiral in 1905, is almost identical - resignation in 1907 and death in 1913 in France.

The rest suffered the same fate - Ukhtomsky, Radlov, Reitsenstein, Enkvist and others either immediately retired or received honorary positions, but not related to the combat activities of the fleet. Almost all of them were disgraced during their lifetime and after death, accused of all sins and went down in history as some mediocrity. Meanwhile, those who did not go to war made their careers much better, in fact, the peers of the retired, but who did not fight, and therefore not disgraced, were nominated to the first roles.

To be fair, all this did not affect the younger generation, those who met the war as ship commanders made good careers, they essentially led the Russian fleet into the First World War, but they could not contain the revolution. It is understandable - the normal connection of generations in the navy was interrupted, the old career ladder was broken in search of the extreme for everything, but they did not really have time to lay down the new one. Yes, and Birilev was not better than Stark or Rozhdestvensky, he simply did not go into battle and did not expose himself to the inevitable defeat, so he became a minister. And Rozhdestvensky, with his exaggerated sense of duty, went, so he received wounds and resigned.

In general, of course, the normal reaction of the state apparatus to a catastrophe arranged by it, even in a mild version, could have been executed in another era, but if you count the damage from the search for switchmen during this period ... Everyone who earned such expensive experience in commanding formations turned out to be switchmen ships.
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    8 February 2022 04: 55
    Uh-huh, dreaming of innocent babies! hi
    1. +9
      8 February 2022 07: 00
      After the glorious galaxy of naval commanders of the 18th and first half of the 19th century, the command and training in the Russian fleet by the emperor was somehow not very good. However, victory has many sons, defeat has all sorts of stepchildren.
    2. +9
      8 February 2022 08: 33
      Yes, everyone in the fleet had to be handed over, in the palace and some kind of title ... like "hero"
  2. +7
    8 February 2022 05: 01
    The fate of the admirals of the Russo-Japanese War

    The title is promising, but far from complete. I wonder what criteria the author was guided by when compiling his short list?
    By the way, where are the Japanese?
    Given the content of the note, it would be logical to title it like this:
    "Destiny some Russians Admirals of the Russo-Japanese War.

    ... and others either immediately retired, or received honorary positions, but not related to the combat activities of the fleet. Almost all of them were disgraced during their lifetime and after death, accused of all sins and went down in history as some mediocrity.

    Roman, you should at least read Wikipedia, or something ...

    Here is a quote about Viren (which of the others):
    "On his return from captivity, Robert Nikolaevich Viren was appointed junior flagship of the Black Sea Fleet Division (1906), then head of the training and artillery detachment of the Baltic Fleet (1906-1907), acting chief commander of the Black Sea Fleet and Black Sea ports (1907-1908).
    Since 1909, the chief commander of the Kronstadt port and the military governor of Kronstadt, Vice Admiral.
    1. +13
      8 February 2022 05: 52
      Since 1909, the chief commander of the Kronstadt port and the military governor of Kronstadt, Vice Admiral.

      Then the sailors raised Viren on bayonets, he was an odious figure. We shot a wonderful film "Midshipman Panin" (1960) about the Russian fleet of that time with Vyacheslav Tikhonov in the title role, and Admiral Viren was also present in the excellent performance of Evgeny Teterin.
      1. +1
        8 February 2022 06: 10
        Quote: Sea Cat
        Then the sailors raised Viren on bayonets, the figure was odious

        And what was expressed by this "odiousness"?
        1. +13
          8 February 2022 06: 19
          And you watch the movie, everything is clear there. By the way, the consultant of the film was Leonid Sobolev, himself a midshipman from the last release of midshipmen.
          1. 0
            8 February 2022 16: 05
            Quote: Sea Cat
            And you watch the movie, everything is clear there.

            The question is, dear colleague, to what extent can this film, which is a product of its era, claim historical accuracy?
            Revolutionary sailors killed hundreds of officers of the Russian Imperial Navy, and this topic is waiting for its researchers.
            The main question here is who was behind all this, who and why needed to behead the fleet?
            1. +1
              9 February 2022 00: 24
              The main question here is who was behind all this, who and why needed to behead the fleet?

              In the same film, a letter from Lenin is quoted, which talks about what a revolutionary fleet can do if it is skillfully led. Here is your answer. Unfortunately, I don’t remember the quote verbatim, and I still don’t want to watch the film for the sake of it. Try it yourself. hi
              1. +3
                9 February 2022 04: 47
                Quote: Sea Cat
                In the same film, a letter from Lenin is quoted, which talks about what a revolutionary fleet can do if it is skillfully led. Here is your answer.

                With all due respect, Konstantin, this is not the answer.
                Admiral Viren was killed by sailors on March 14, 1917, for seven months to accomplishment of the Great October Socialist Revolution, so the Bolsheviks have nothing to do with it.
                There were other forces at work.
                1. 0
                  9 February 2022 05: 14
                  so the Bolsheviks have nothing to do with it.


                  And what, they did not conduct propaganda? Along with all the others.
                  1. -1
                    12 February 2022 21: 46
                    In March 1917? For the sake of general development, do you even ask what the Bolshevik Party was like at that time, what was its size in Russia, which of the least significant figures was able to organize in Petrograd (especially among the sailors) at least some kind of propaganda and what kind of propaganda could be effective ...
                    1. +1
                      13 February 2022 11: 55
                      At least ask for general development,

                      Judging by the fact that you are rude to people who have not offended you in any way, it makes no sense to talk about your development, it, this development, is just rushing out of you. laughing
                    2. +1
                      14 February 2022 15: 45
                      Quote: Bogalex
                      what was the Bolshevik party like at that time, what was its size in Russia, which of the least significant figures was able to organize at least some kind of propaganda in Petrograd (especially among the sailors) and what kind of propaganda could this propaganda be effective ...

                      Well, well ... according to the official history of the CPSU (b)
                      "The workers of Russia and the Bolshevik Party were the first in the world to successfully exploit the weakness of capitalism, break through the front of imperialism, overthrow the tsar and set up Soviets of Workers' and Soldiers' Deputies." History of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks). A short course edited by the Commission of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, 1938. Page 173.

                      That is, the Bolsheviks themselves say that yes, they all did it)))
                      1. 0
                        14 February 2022 21: 18
                        Since 1938, historical science has somewhat replenished its knowledge base in comparison with, to put it mildly, the ideologized "Short Course edited by the Commission of the Central Committee."
                        I believe it is not very correct to refer to this work in 2022 as a serious and weighty argument.
                      2. 0
                        16 February 2022 16: 12
                        Quote: Bogalex
                        Since 1938, historical science has somewhat replenished its knowledge base in comparison with, to put it mildly, the ideologized "Short Course edited by the Commission of the Central Committee."
                        I believe it is not very correct to refer to this work in 2022 as a serious and weighty argument.

                        That is, you want to say that in 1938 everyone was sure that the overthrow of the tsar was the main merit of the Bolsheviks, and the rest just "stand around"?
                        Or do you still admit that the cranberries that they tried to feed us for 70 years are very spreading and sour?
                      3. 0
                        16 February 2022 20: 16
                        No, that's not what I mean at all.
                        And I won't continue this conversation. I expressed myself quite clearly, but I have no desire to feed another troll.
        2. -1
          8 February 2022 06: 20
          Quote: Comrade
          And what was expressed by this "odiousness"?

          Nikolashka number two was punched in the head by a Japanese gendarme.
        3. -1
          8 February 2022 21: 15
          Quote: Comrade
          Quote: Sea Cat
          Then the sailors raised Viren on bayonets, the figure was odious

          And what was expressed by this "odiousness"?

          What? Well, at least selfishness.
      2. +5
        8 February 2022 13: 30
        Still, referring to a feature film (very good, one must admit) is somewhat ...
        Robert Nikolaevich, indeed, was a very demanding and pedantic officer, who, by these qualities, earned the sincere hatred of his sailors. But the truth is that many other officers and admirals died along with Viren, including those who did not have such a reputation.
        1. 0
          9 February 2022 00: 21
          Good night, Ivan! hi
          was a very demanding and pedantic officer,

          This "pedantry" has another name, such "dragons" caused the sailors to hate the entire officer corps, it was not in vain that I mentioned Sobolev - the man was not from the sailor's cockpit. Kolbasyev also had something about this, I don’t remember now. I did not quote Pikul, I do not trust him as a historian, and he is not a historian either.
          1. +4
            9 February 2022 10: 00
            And hello to you soldier
            On the one hand, you are undoubtedly right. People boiled and many fell under the distribution.
            On the other hand, I myself was a sailor and I know very well that for those who are in the cockpit, even the legitimate demands of those who are in the cabins seem to be a terrible arbitrariness :)))
            With that, yes. Utsava requirements then and now are slightly different things.
            And if we are already talking about films about the revolution, in one of them (I don’t remember which one) there was an episode when the Red Guards conduct a search at the bourgeoisie and a certain sailor appears. Then the sailor in command of the Reds tries to find out if there is a mummer in front of him, asks:
            - Who was the head of the Kronstadt port?
            - Viren, to him, such and such!
            - And who commanded the fleet?
            - Essen, dog!
            In general, it may be good that Nikolai Ottovich did not live. Also, from the point of view of the sailors, he was still a satrap.
            1. +3
              9 February 2022 10: 20
              maybe it’s good that Nikolai Ottovich did not live

              Yes, I think so too, Essen was a real sailor and knew his business perfectly. Well, at least now he was given a debt of memory.
  3. +5
    8 February 2022 07: 25
    Admiral Alekseev sounded the alarm before the start of the war

    Yeah, that's why on the eve of the war he said:
    Why spend big money from the sovereign's treasury on maneuvers, in view of the absence in the Yellow Sea of ​​a serious opponent to Russian interests»


    This man, who imagines himself to be an unsurpassed strategist, himself, in fact, over the head of Sark, commanded the fleet and his bans on study led him, in fact, to an incapacitated state. His fault is the unsuccessful start of the war

    It was Admiral Alekseev banned bringing the ships of the squadron into combat readiness, after the urgent departure of all Japanese subjects from Port Arthur to Chifu on January 26, 1904.

    he wrote on the report of Vice Admiral Stark about the need to set up anti-mine nets and observe blackout on ships stationed in the outer roadstead in connection with a possible attack by the Japanese:
    "Premature measure!"


    That this was immediately followed by the 27th is known.

    the usual workhorse of the Empire.


    It would be better if this horse rested ....
  4. +9
    8 February 2022 08: 01
    Another attempt to whitewash a black dog, especially funny about the personality of the viceroy
  5. +10
    8 February 2022 08: 14
    The history of Zinovy ​​​​Petrovich and his biography are probably known to everyone who has come off so far off. It is less known that he is one of the fathers of the Noviks, that he planned the reforms of the fleet,

    Dear author, what Zinovy ​​Petrovich planned to reform, then, lay at the bottom of the Tsushima Strait. Maybe Zinovy ​​Petrovich developed a new tactic for using the ships that remained on Batik. Indeed, for those few ships that remained there, "special tactics" were needed. What reforms are we talking about, share, if not difficult?
  6. +4
    8 February 2022 08: 16
    Such a "color" .. such a "color" ... Against this background, what is the fate of the Japanese admirals?
  7. +1
    8 February 2022 08: 56


    The revolution judged everyone. More precisely, the people who came to power.
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. +4
    8 February 2022 18: 30
    Somehow very short and crumpled. Lived, retired, died. Well, plus a couple of curtseys in the style of "guiltlessly guilty." And, again, I agree with my colleagues: the title does not reflect the essence of the article. Not all Russian admirals are mentioned (PMSM, it was worth mentioning Nebogatov), ​​and the Japanese are completely forgotten. Although it would be appropriate to recall at least the key figures: Togo, Kamimura, Virgo, Uriu ... In general, as one cartoon character said: "it won't be enough"!)))
  11. 0
    8 February 2022 21: 04
    guilty without guilt
    Seriously? I consider Rozhdestvensky personally guilty, and the main culprit of the Tsushima defeat. Wishful thinking, for which other people paid with their lives.
  12. 0
    11 February 2022 23: 47
    Some strange note "about nothing" ...
    Alekseev in less than a month, in Port Arthur, he managed to "pull up" the mine defense and security of the raids, thanks to which they successfully repelled the most powerful fire-ship attack, resigned from leadership positions under socio-political pressure, but retired only in 1917, died in Yalta .
    StarkIf he had stayed in Port Arthur, he could have shown himself at least as good as Vitgeft, but his superiors and fate saved him from more dangerous trials.
    Skrydlov worked conscientiously - from the shore he competently directed the actions of the VOK (planning and evaluation of actions), in 1906-07 he put things in order on the rebellious Black Sea Fleet, no one "pushed" him.
    Christmas "snatched" no less from compatriots than from the Japanese, so he lived five years less than he could ...
    Jessen the figure is clearly overestimated, in principle, after the loss of the “Bogatyr”, nothing “shone” for him, except for sitting on the shore awaiting punishment, however, when his health failed more sensible and successful Bezobrazov, he returned, respectively, to Jessen we also owe the loss of Rurik.
    The author generally swept the rest of the acting admirals into a faceless bunch: both the clever Bezobrazov, and the reasonably cautious Enquist (well, why is he worse than Reizenstein ?!), and the unfortunate Nebogatov, and those who ingloriously ended the war by capitulation Ukhtomsky, Loschinsky, Grigorovich and Viren.
    For example, Dubasov is also worthy of mention - one of the heroes of the Russian-Turkish (like Makarov, Rozhdestvensky and Skrydlov), an experienced Pacific Oceanist, could adequately replace Makarov, adequately represented and defended the interests of Russia during the investigation of the Gull incident, was not afraid to speak out in favor of continuing war, while worthily passed the bloody tests of the revolution that followed the defeat that he could not prevent.