Ukrainian media called "fake" statements about the UAV shot down over Belarus

In Ukraine, they continue to claim that the reconnaissance drone intercepted by the Belarusian military is not Ukrainian. Opinions of various "experts" have already appeared in the Ukrainian press, proving that Minsk's statements are lies.

On February 3, the military attaché of Ukraine, Katsuba, was summoned to the Ministry of Defense of Belarus, who was handed a note of protest in connection with the increasing cases of violations of the state border. As explained in the military department, on January 24, 2022, a Ukrainian reconnaissance drone was intercepted on the territory of Belarus, which was heading towards the Brestsky training ground, where joint Russian-Belarusian military exercises are taking place.

According to information taken from the onboard equipment of the UAV, it was launched from the territory of the Kovelsky district of the Volyn region (Ukraine), 1,7 km from the border, which it crossed in the area of ​​the village of Khmelishche, Maloritsky district, but was detected and intercepted.

In Ukraine, a statement about a shot down over Belarus drone The APU was called "fake". First, the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry announced this, then the military disowned the drone, and then "heavy artillery" went into battle - all kinds of experts proving that a Ukrainian drone cannot be Ukrainian.

As one of these "experts" stated, the drone shown by the Belarusians allegedly cannot be Ukrainian, because it "does not look like". According to him, in Minsk they talk about the Spectator UAV, but in fact this is not so, because some design details differ from the original version of the UAV. In fact, the Belarusians took the fuselage from the Spectator UAV and attached wings to it from another droneto accuse Ukraine, but in fact this is a provocation developed by the Russian special services.

In principle, the Ukrainian expert did not say anything new, everything had long been invented by curators from the United States before him. The option of blaming the other side in case of failure has long been used in Washington.

Comments

[Victor_B]

In fact, the Belarusians took the fuselage from the Spectator UAV and attached wings from another drone to it in order to accuse Ukraine, but in fact this is a provocation developed by the Russian special services.

Aha
And then they themselves blew up the air conditioner on it ...
Then they shot themselves...
Basically everyone died...

[Alexander Galaktionov]

And what does the expert write about this, all the experts are an evil expert from Odessa in LJ

[APASUS]

Quote: Alexander Galaktionov

And what does the expert write about this, all the experts are an evil expert from Odessa in LJ

He writes about all sorts of inconsistencies between the model in the photo of the downed UAV and the UKRAINIAN UAV SPECTATOR. All comparisons are quite accurate, but here's the problem, this text consists of brainwashing. violated the Belarusian border.
Fucking manipulator

[Kir shadrin]

Are you sure that this is not a Belarusian / Russian UAV? Looks a lot like Orlan

[Vadim237]

Very similar - but only the dimensions do not correspond to Orlan 10

[Kir shadrin]

So the Spectator is also smaller, like Orlan, but this, as I understand it, does not stop anyone here. And how do you determine the size from a photograph of the wreckage? Learn, I want it too!

[75 Sergey]

Yes, both have wings, looks like.
But here you obviously have bloomers and vyshyvanka peeking out, and you obviously cut your hair crooked, a tuft remained.

[Shaman]

Haha my friend stole the slapstick, he probably got a dumpling in his throat and the saucepan slipped off the forelock

[Vladimir Mashkov]

Boris Rozhin at Colonel Kassada has an article about this drone with photos. This is Spector. But not serial, but a prototype. And what difference does it make if he took off from Ukraine and made reconnaissance, photographed in Belarus, flew to the training ground near Brest?

And of course, they will not admit to being "great-Ukrainians", they declared it a Belarusian-Russian provocation. We learned from the State Department/NATO/Europe!

[Kir shadrin]

O! And so the transition to personality began)))

[Barberry25]

with the same success you look like Kipelov)

[venik]

Quote from Kir Shadrin

Are you sure that this is not a Belarusian / Russian UAV? Looks a lot like Orlan

======
This is only for amateurs, he "looks" like "Orlan-10"!
Whoever understands at least a little and is "in the subject" - that's the difference will see!

[hector]

Are you sure that this is not a Belarusian / Russian UAV? Looks a lot like Orlan

Not at all similar. The shape of the keel is not the same, the position of the wing is not the same, the nose is not the same, the proportions of the fuselage are not the same.

[alex neym_2]

Curious Varvara's wings were torn off!
Following the logic of denials from Ukraine, whoever produced this device launched it. In Ukraine, UAVs of this class are produced in Kiev by OJSC "Meridian named after Korolev. Baby talk ...

[Crimean partisan 1974]

UAVs of this class are not produced in Ukraine

...... we spell "the BpAK-MP-1 complex (which includes the Spectator UAV) is included in the state military order of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine for 2016" .... further developer and manufacturer "LLC" Politeko Aero Kiev Polytechnic Institute
Chuguev Aviation Repair Plant "... well, how do you like it ... nishtyak !!!

[mojohed2012]

Yes you? This is a never installed UFO-UAV-device, launched by unknown people from nowhere!

[Victor_B]

Quote: mojohed2012

Yes you? This is a never installed UFO-UAV-device, launched by unknown people from nowhere!

...just unknown snipers aircraft modelers had fun.

[dauria]

Curious Varvara's wings were torn off!

And the bird is ugly. And it will soon be impossible to plant such. Just shoot down, or wait until she falls. I look, autonomous inertial systems without GPS have already registered at the amateur household level. Yes, almost with the correction of the video image with the embedded card. It is difficult to fight with such a small fry, with an overgrown fat "Bayraktar" is much easier.
Digression.
War is war, but what should the oligarchs do now? How to protect from prying eyes the palace buildings of fur storages? Even Chinese drone silencers will not help, even if you take the "Pantsir" with the expectation of a staff of servants.

[Charik]

How to protect the palace buildings from prying eyes by planting fur coats, challenges to a duel, accusations of terrorism and other nonsense that they have already invented and legalized

[venik]

Quote: Victor_B

Aha
And then they themselves blew up the air conditioner on it ...
Then they shot themselves...
Basically everyone died...

=========
That's right, Viktor Petrovich! "I am not me and the hut is not mine!".....
This is quite in the spirit of the "Ukropatriots": They are not capable of anything more! IN PRINCIPLE .... from the word IN GENERAL! ... Well, what can you do? - such a MENTALITY! First "shit", and then - to make a "sour face" like "What do I have to do with this? and me - for what?"

[210ox]

Write in the eyes that God's dew .. The Martians launched .. Yeah ..

[210ox]

Well, it's also a UAV! They defeated the Armenians in Karabakh! Further on Lavrov

[krops777]

Well, it's also a UAV! They defeated the Armenians in Karabakh!

Given the interest that the FSA is now in these exercises, they have clearly taken care of the safety of the airspace, the Ukrainian generals should understand this or they have nothing to think about or they are driven to the scaffold with kicks.

[Fedorovich]

Those who are able to think do not become Ukrainian generals.

[NDR-791]

Belarusians took the fuselage from the Spectator UAV and attached wings from another drone to it in order to accuse Ukraine, in fact This is a provocation, developed by the Russian special services.

Well, if you want a really big provocation, then we can. Drag a beaten bayraktar from Syria along the road by drawing Krajina identification marks. You don’t even need to launch it, just put it on the central square in Minsk and call journalists. And then we have nothing to do, attach some wings to something, suffer to start, launch, shoot down ... why?

[x917nt]

Well, if you want a really big provocation, then we can.

Wang.
The next step will be a strike on Belarusian territory from a certain UAV. Which will then be "identified" as Ukrainian. On the face of an act of aggression of Ukraine on sovereign Belarus. Lukashenka responds with his blow to Ukraine. An armed conflict begins. In which she is forced to join on the side of her ally, the Russian Federation.
C.T.D.

[lucul]

Wangju

Hey Vanga - not so many countries produce UAVs, but such a UAV as this Ukrainian one is produced neither by Russia nor Belarus. Moreover, the flight route is written in the ROM, and reading data from the ROM for Belarusians will not be a problem.)))

[x917nt]

The Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Belarus reports that photographs of Ukrainian positions and Belarus were found in the "Ukrainian drone" that they planted on their territory.

Some strange set of photos for the "Ukrainian drone". Why would he photograph the positions of his troops?

[boris epstein]

In the LDNR, they have long been practicing peeling information from forcibly planted UAVs. The UAV electronics start working immediately after launch. Therefore, there are photographs of Ukrainian positions, which once again proves where it was launched from. Pictures are always dated. If the date/time of the images of Ukrainian positions is earlier than those of Belarus, then it was launched from Ukraine.

[ermak124.0]

x917, urgently stop smoking rubbish, you are powerfully echoed.

[olhon]

As one of these "experts" stated, the drone shown by the Belarusians cannot be Ukrainian, because it "does not look like". We disperse ...

[1976AG]

Quote: olhon

As one of these "experts" stated, the drone shown by the Belarusians cannot be Ukrainian, because it "does not look like". We disperse ...

Judging by "it looks like it doesn't look like it", then everything is interesting here. The military equipment of Ukraine, Russia and Belarus is just sooooo similar !!! How do we determine ownership?

[Barberry25]

yes, it’s very simple, they’ll take it apart and show the filling) this is a standard approach when a piece of information is laid out that the opponent is trying to refute with the strongest arguments, and then information is laid out proving his lie

[Tavi]

How do we determine ownership?

there is no yellow blockade flag, which means 128% that this is not Ukrainian.

[Egoza]

Quote: olhon

As one of these "experts" stated, the drone shown by the Belarusians cannot be Ukrainian, because it "does not look like". Let's go...

To some extent, the expert is right. Well, Ukraine does not have its own - everything is foreign - Turkish, American .... so they are trying to disown. And, in general, was the drone painted in a "yellow-blaky" color? Was it inscribed "Glory to Bandera"? Not? So not ours.

[Alexander Galaktionov]

Wow this is all military equipment that is not painted in yellow-blakyt, this is the technique of the Russian Federation. All the can, you overslept the capture

[1976AG]

Yes, given that the flight information was preserved in it, it would be better if they referred to the mistake of the operators and apologized. They didn’t even learn to lie beautifully.

[Alexander Galaktionov]

It would be possible to refer to the UAV conditionally there by the Ministry of Emergency Situations or how is it with them?

[1976AG]

Quote: Alexander Galaktionov

It would be possible to refer to the UAV conditionally there by the Ministry of Emergency Situations or how is it with them?

That's why I say that with the saved flight information, it would be most acceptable to refer specifically to the operator's error. They wanted to fly along the border, but did not notice the border posts)

[ermak124.0]

1976, it works when communication is between normal people. but can a jumping in a saucepan be normal? So I don't think so...

[sabakina]

Quote: olhon

As one of these "experts" stated, the drone shown by the Belarusians cannot be Ukrainian, because it "does not look like". We disperse ...

- Present the documents! ... The nose is not the same!
- How not that one? Are you saying that I was photographed with a different nose?
film "Take care of women."

[Charik]

well, yes - no pots and forelock

[SAG]

It’s like ... So you shouldn’t stop, but shoot down and land everything that approaches the border and does not respond to warnings

[Nexcom]

It was necessary to forcefully land and show all the logos and so on in order to fail. Although, most likely, the drone was sent without identification marks in order to just get rid of it.

about how the Syabry themselves stuck other wings - this is certainly strong. Euro-Sumerians are adept at making excuses. right at the syabrs there is a whole workshop for the manufacture of left wings to be screwed to downed Ukrainian drones. and an art and design platoon - to paint tridents. the numbers on the details are immediately interrupted by themselves.

[Egoza]

Quote: Nexcom

right at the syabrs there is a whole workshop for the manufacture of left wings to be screwed to downed Ukrainian drones

Aha! They, like Icarus, attached the wings with wax, so the drone collapsed. )))

[Nexcom]

Not wax, but fat most likely.

[Aviator_]

Not wax, but fat most likely.

What are you? Tse strategic material! Issued only under signature Ze!

[Nexcom]

Well, they probably didn’t regret such a thing.
The main thing is to trample the Muscovites.

[Prisoner]

Where do they get their fat from today? And who can be trusted there to smear the wings of some garbage with LAD!

[Alexander Galaktionov]

There are no logos on the UAV, but to show the topographic location from where it took off, who launched it and how it crossed the border with the topographic location, all doubts will disappear

[Nexcom]

Uuuu, not a fact, they will get away. They will say - the Muscovites secretly leaked into the territory of Ukraine, launched a drone, violated the border of Belarus and now blame Svidomo. And prove it's not true! Also, LDNR people will be dragged in how to give a drink! The type of separatists assisted this provocation. Like - well, how to peacefully negotiate with the separatists after that? MH17 helped the Muscovites shoot down, they took part in a provocation with a drone. Generally...

[Alexander Galaktionov]

By the way, they have a UAV similar to our Orlan, they showed at the exhibition

[Crimean partisan 1974]

the drone shown by Belarusians cannot be Ukrainian, because it "does not look like".

... yes, it doesn’t matter whose ... the main thing was discovered and intercepted ... it will also be junk if

[Alexander Galaktionov]

Such excuses

[Crimean partisan 1974]

Such excuses

.... why are they ... 15 pieces of greenbacks lost against the background that from the treasury millions of people are pushing it like that ... a trifle ... the main thing the junta was shown about the uselessness of drones when air defense is not asleep

[aszzz888]

What else can you expect from these zombies? What do they confess? Because there EVERYTHING is stupidly denied. They have a teacher in this matter)) - a dog. He sticks out shameless peepers, and without paper he won’t connect two words.

[LiSiCyn]

I would like to contribute to the discussion that has unfolded due to the impossibility of unambiguously determining the model and belonging of the UAV that fell in Belarus.

I would not like to state anything unambiguously (unlike the British garbage dump with a Latvian residence permit, created to legalize investigations and stuffing MI6, and already issuing this UAV as Orlan-10), however, we found at least two more Ukrainian UAVs that cannot be unambiguously identified that fell on the territory of the LPR at different times.

All these three drones have one thing in common: the engine maintenance compartment cover is almost identical in design with a characteristic latch.

1. UAV that crashed on the territory of Belarus in 2022.
2. UAV that crashed on the territory of the LPR in 2021.
3. UAV that crashed on the territory of the LPR in 2020.

We can definitely say that such a cover with a locking mechanism of a similar design is not used on Russian UAVs of the Orlan family, but is used by Ukrainian small-scale/garage drone manufacturers.

[Ksanatos]

Even if ... then if ours managed to enter the territory of Ukraine, launch a drone and return back, then I have bad news for the Ukrainians.

[Jcvai]

Do you want to surprise those who have Russian armored armies dug in near Kiev for many years?

[Cat Alexandrovich]

It’s interesting, but how was it intercepted, with what? How were they shot down, with what? VO could write about this? The details of what happened are very interesting.

[krops777]

It’s interesting, but how was it intercepted, with what? How were they shot down, with what? VO could write about this? The details of what happened are very interesting.

Judging by the photo, he was not shot down, but was forcibly imprisoned.

[Alexander Galaktionov]

Most likely with the help of electronic warfare, there is no damage from bullets and shrapnel

[mojohed2012]

It’s interesting when the Belarusians or the LDNR land a couple of bayraktars - they will also declare that they are not theirs, and there was nothing. And the operators who led these bayraktars are clearly being kicked in the loins by a group, because the price tag is clearly incomparable with this "mundane unknown device."

[Egoza]

Quote: mojohed2012

And the operators who led these bayraktars are clearly kicked in the loins by a group

Yes, in Ukraine, operators somehow disappear in an unknown direction! That's how it is with Boeing ... They look for it later, they look for it - they can't find it.

[sergo1914]

Well, if “Glory to Ukraine” is not written on the sides, then it is not Ukrainian. It's obvious. Any expert will confirm.

[Tavi]

And there is no flag, it will not even take off without it.

[Prisoner]

Have their masters learned to lie so brazenly? Though these and in such business docks.

[Nikolaevich I]

"I'm not me and the horse is not mine!"

[tihonmarine]

In fact, the Belarusians took the fuselage from the Spectator UAV and attached wings from another drone to it in order to blame Ukraine

If we follow the logic of Ukraine, the Belarusians stuck a mare's tail on a cow and called the cow a mare.

[riwas]

Ukrainian media called "fake" statements about the UAV shot down over Belarus

Never lie so much as before the war.

[Kerensky]

Let's wait until they ask for a refund...

[Emergency]

But they will ask. Their greed is stronger than common sense. And a lot.

[Charik]

Serious prejudice-Belarusian Defense Ministry accused of lying-Ukrainian-MO Foreign Ministry and media

[Retvizan 8]

We have long known the price of all these Ukropov's statements: "they fired on themselves", "it's not us", "it was the Kremlin propagandists who came up with" ...
And then they themselves burn at the level of the President of Ukraine, who declares that he knows and appreciates the people from the SBU who planned and carried out punitive operations.

[dimbasic]

not for nothing that the Anglo-Saxons of diplomats from Belarus gathered to withdraw. how do they need this war

[Kolesnikov Valery]

Any devices are always being upgraded and changed, so there is no dispute about anything
The most important thing is that everything is written inside...
“Based on the received photographs and information from the flight controller, after processing, it is possible to compile a detailed map of the area with geodetic reference of the objects located on it,” said Maxim Chizhik, senior engineer for testing unmanned aerial systems at JSC 558 Aviation Repair Plant.
As a result of the examination of the drone, it was established that it was programmed to work in a certain way. The route laid down initially is saved in its memory. The operation of the device in the airspace of Belarus was planned and marks were placed where it was supposed to fix a specific territory. In fact, he took 1 photo in 15 seconds, in 50 minutes of flight he took more than 200 photos.

According to the task, it was necessary to shoot the territory in great detail - every square. This is clearly visible in the saved route.

[magdama]

I have never heard a more DIBILATE anthem than the Olympic one in my life. Absolutely no melody. Coubertin booze.