Military Review

Ukrainian media called "fake" statements about the UAV shot down over Belarus

80

In Ukraine, they continue to claim that the reconnaissance drone intercepted by the Belarusian military is not Ukrainian. Opinions of various "experts" have already appeared in the Ukrainian press, proving that Minsk's statements are lies.


On February 3, the military attaché of Ukraine, Katsuba, was summoned to the Ministry of Defense of Belarus, who was handed a note of protest in connection with the increasing cases of violations of the state border. As explained in the military department, on January 24, 2022, a Ukrainian reconnaissance drone was intercepted on the territory of Belarus, which was heading towards the Brestsky training ground, where joint Russian-Belarusian military exercises are taking place.

According to information taken from the onboard equipment of the UAV, it was launched from the territory of the Kovelsky district of the Volyn region (Ukraine), 1,7 km from the border, which it crossed in the area of ​​the village of Khmelishche, Maloritsky district, but was detected and intercepted.


In Ukraine, the statement about the UAV drone shot down over Belarus was called a "fake". First, the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry announced this, then the military disowned the drone, and then "heavy artillery" went into battle - all kinds of experts proving that a Ukrainian drone cannot be Ukrainian.

As one of these "experts" stated, the drone shown by the Belarusians allegedly cannot be Ukrainian, because it "does not look like". According to him, in Minsk they talk about the Spectator UAV, but in fact this is not so, because some design details differ from the original version of the UAV. In fact, the Belarusians took the fuselage from the Spectator UAV and attached wings from another drone to it in order to accuse Ukraine, but in fact this is a provocation developed by the Russian special services.

In principle, the Ukrainian expert did not say anything new, everything had long been invented by curators from the United States before him. The option of blaming the other side in case of failure has long been used in Washington.
Photos used:
https://www.obozrevatel.com
80 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Victor_B
    Victor_B 4 February 2022 07: 26
    +41
    In fact, the Belarusians took the fuselage from the Spectator UAV and attached wings from another drone to it in order to accuse Ukraine, but in fact this is a provocation developed by the Russian special services.
    Aha
    And then they themselves blew up the air conditioner on it ...
    Then they shot themselves...
    Basically everyone died... crying
    1. Alexander Galaktionov
      Alexander Galaktionov 4 February 2022 07: 35
      0
      And what does the expert write about this, all the experts are an evil expert from Odessa in LJ what
      1. APASUS
        APASUS 4 February 2022 08: 25
        +13
        Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
        And what does the expert write about this, all the experts are an evil expert from Odessa in LJ

        He writes about all sorts of inconsistencies between the model in the photo of the downed UAV and the UKRAINIAN UAV SPECTATOR. All comparisons are quite accurate, but here's the problem, this text consists of brainwashing. violated the Belarusian border.
        Fucking manipulator
        1. Kir shadrin
          Kir shadrin 4 February 2022 12: 16
          -26
          Are you sure that this is not a Belarusian / Russian UAV? Looks a lot like Orlan
          1. Vadim237
            Vadim237 4 February 2022 14: 11
            +11
            Very similar - but only the dimensions do not correspond to Orlan 10
            1. Kir shadrin
              Kir shadrin 4 February 2022 17: 20
              -12
              So the Spectator is also smaller, like Orlan, but this, as I understand it, does not stop anyone here. And how do you determine the size from a photograph of the wreckage? Learn, I want it too!
              1. 75 Sergey
                75 Sergey 4 February 2022 18: 25
                +5
                Yes, both have wings, looks like.
                But here you obviously have bloomers and vyshyvanka peeking out, and you obviously cut your hair crooked, a tuft remained.
                1. Shaman
                  Shaman 4 February 2022 18: 49
                  +2
                  Haha my friend stole the slapstick, he probably got a dumpling in his throat and the saucepan slipped off the forelock
                2. Vladimir Mashkov
                  Vladimir Mashkov 6 February 2022 19: 35
                  -1
                  Boris Rozhin at Colonel Kassada has an article about this drone with photos. This is Spector. But not serial, but a prototype. And what difference does it make if he took off from Ukraine and made reconnaissance, photographed in Belarus, flew to the training ground near Brest?

                  And of course, they will not admit to being "great-Ukrainians", they declared it a Belarusian-Russian provocation. We learned from the State Department/NATO/Europe! laughing laughing laughing
                3. Kir shadrin
                  Kir shadrin 7 February 2022 11: 29
                  0
                  O! And so the transition to personality began)))
          2. Barberry25
            Barberry25 4 February 2022 14: 15
            -5
            with the same success you look like Kipelov)
          3. venik
            venik 4 February 2022 18: 22
            +1
            Quote from Kir Shadrin
            Are you sure that this is not a Belarusian / Russian UAV? Looks a lot like Orlan

            ======
            This is only for amateurs, he "looks" like "Orlan-10"!
            Whoever understands at least a little and is "in the subject" - that's the difference will see!
          4. hector
            hector 5 February 2022 12: 23
            +2
            Are you sure that this is not a Belarusian / Russian UAV? Looks a lot like Orlan

            Not at all similar. The shape of the keel is not the same, the position of the wing is not the same, the nose is not the same, the proportions of the fuselage are not the same.
    2. alex neym_2
      alex neym_2 4 February 2022 07: 59
      +16
      Curious Varvara's wings were torn off!
      Following the logic of denials from Ukraine, whoever produced this device launched it. In Ukraine, UAVs of this class are produced in Kiev by OJSC "Meridian named after Korolev. Baby talk ...
      1. Crimean partisan 1974
        Crimean partisan 1974 4 February 2022 08: 11
        +18
        UAVs of this class are not produced in Ukraine
        ...... we spell "the BpAK-MP-1 complex (which includes the Spectator UAV) is included in the state military order of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine for 2016" .... further developer and manufacturer "LLC" Politeko Aero Kiev Polytechnic Institute
        Chuguev Aviation Repair Plant "... well, how do you like it ... nishtyak !!!
        1. mojohed2012
          mojohed2012 4 February 2022 08: 15
          +9
          Yes you? This is a never installed UFO-UAV-device, launched by unknown people from nowhere!
          1. Victor_B
            Victor_B 4 February 2022 08: 31
            +4
            Quote: mojohed2012
            Yes you? This is a never installed UFO-UAV-device, launched by unknown people from nowhere!
            ...just unknown snipers aircraft modelers had fun.
      2. dauria
        dauria 4 February 2022 08: 34
        -1
        Curious Varvara's wings were torn off!

        And the bird is ugly. And it will soon be impossible to plant such. Just shoot down, or wait until she falls. I look, autonomous inertial systems without GPS have already registered at the amateur household level. Yes, almost with the correction of the video image with the embedded card. It is difficult to fight with such a small fry, with an overgrown fat "Bayraktar" is much easier.
        Digression.
        War is war, but what should the oligarchs do now? How to protect from prying eyes the palace buildings of fur storages? wassat Even Chinese drone silencers will not help, even if you take the "Pantsir" with the expectation of a staff of servants.
        1. Charik
          Charik 4 February 2022 11: 56
          +3
          How to protect the palace buildings from prying eyes by planting fur coats, challenges to a duel, accusations of terrorism and other nonsense that they have already invented and legalized
    3. venik
      venik 4 February 2022 17: 57
      +2
      Quote: Victor_B
      Aha
      And then they themselves blew up the air conditioner on it ...
      Then they shot themselves...
      Basically everyone died...

      =========
      That's right, Viktor Petrovich! drinks "I am not me and the hut is not mine!".....
      This is quite in the spirit of the "Ukropatriots": They are not capable of anything more! IN PRINCIPLE .... from the word IN GENERAL! ... Well, what can you do? - such a MENTALITY! First "shit", and then - to make a "sour face" like "What do I have to do with this? and me - for what?"request
  2. 210ox
    210ox 4 February 2022 07: 26
    +9
    Write in the eyes that God's dew .. The Martians launched .. Yeah ..
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. 210ox
        210ox 4 February 2022 07: 37
        +11
        Well, it's also a UAV! They defeated the Armenians in Karabakh! Further on Lavrov
        1. krops777
          krops777 4 February 2022 07: 44
          +4
          Well, it's also a UAV! They defeated the Armenians in Karabakh!


          Given the interest that the FSA is now in these exercises, they have clearly taken care of the safety of the airspace, the Ukrainian generals should understand this or they have nothing to think about or they are driven to the scaffold with kicks.
          1. Fedorovich
            Fedorovich 4 February 2022 08: 26
            +15
            Those who are able to think do not become Ukrainian generals.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. NDR-791
      NDR-791 4 February 2022 07: 40
      +16
      Belarusians took the fuselage from the Spectator UAV and attached wings from another drone to it in order to accuse Ukraine, in fact This is a provocation, developed by the Russian special services.

      Well, if you want a really big provocation, then we can. Drag a beaten bayraktar from Syria along the road by drawing Krajina identification marks. You don’t even need to launch it, just put it on the central square in Minsk and call journalists. And then we have nothing to do, attach some wings to something, suffer to start, launch, shoot down ... why?
      1. x917nt
        x917nt 4 February 2022 10: 07
        -23
        Well, if you want a really big provocation, then we can.

        Wang.
        The next step will be a strike on Belarusian territory from a certain UAV. Which will then be "identified" as Ukrainian. On the face of an act of aggression of Ukraine on sovereign Belarus. Lukashenka responds with his blow to Ukraine. An armed conflict begins. In which she is forced to join on the side of her ally, the Russian Federation.
        C.T.D.
        1. lucul
          lucul 4 February 2022 12: 41
          +7
          Wangju

          Hey Vanga - not so many countries produce UAVs, but such a UAV as this Ukrainian one is produced neither by Russia nor Belarus. Moreover, the flight route is written in the ROM, and reading data from the ROM for Belarusians will not be a problem.)))
          1. x917nt
            x917nt 4 February 2022 14: 08
            -15
            The Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Belarus reports that photographs of Ukrainian positions and Belarus were found in the "Ukrainian drone" that they planted on their territory.

            Some strange set of photos for the "Ukrainian drone". Why would he photograph the positions of his troops?
            1. boris epstein
              boris epstein 5 February 2022 17: 54
              -1
              In the LDNR, they have long been practicing peeling information from forcibly planted UAVs. The UAV electronics start working immediately after launch. Therefore, there are photographs of Ukrainian positions, which once again proves where it was launched from. Pictures are always dated. If the date/time of the images of Ukrainian positions is earlier than those of Belarus, then it was launched from Ukraine.
        2. ermak124.0
          ermak124.0 5 February 2022 11: 17
          +1
          x917, urgently stop smoking rubbish, you are powerfully echoed.
  3. olhon
    olhon 4 February 2022 07: 28
    +28
    As one of these "experts" stated, the drone shown by the Belarusians cannot be Ukrainian, because it "does not look like". laughing We disperse ...
    1. 1976AG
      1976AG 4 February 2022 07: 34
      +2
      Quote: olhon
      As one of these "experts" stated, the drone shown by the Belarusians cannot be Ukrainian, because it "does not look like". laughing We disperse ...


      Judging by "it looks like it doesn't look like it", then everything is interesting here. The military equipment of Ukraine, Russia and Belarus is just sooooo similar !!! How do we determine ownership?
      1. Barberry25
        Barberry25 4 February 2022 14: 16
        0
        yes, it’s very simple, they’ll take it apart and show the filling) this is a standard approach when a piece of information is laid out that the opponent is trying to refute with the strongest arguments, and then information is laid out proving his lie
      2. Tavi
        Tavi 4 February 2022 15: 51
        0
        How do we determine ownership?

        there is no yellow blockade flag, which means 128% that this is not Ukrainian.
    2. Egoza
      Egoza 4 February 2022 07: 46
      +11
      Quote: olhon
      As one of these "experts" stated, the drone shown by the Belarusians cannot be Ukrainian, because it "does not look like". Let's go...

      To some extent, the expert is right. Well, Ukraine does not have its own - everything is foreign - Turkish, American .... so they are trying to disown. And, in general, was the drone painted in a "yellow-blaky" color? Was it inscribed "Glory to Bandera"? Not? So not ours.
      1. Alexander Galaktionov
        Alexander Galaktionov 4 February 2022 07: 57
        +4
        Wow laughing this is all military equipment that is not painted in yellow-blakyt, this is the technique of the Russian Federation. All the can, you overslept the capture laughing
      2. 1976AG
        1976AG 4 February 2022 07: 58
        +15
        Yes, given that the flight information was preserved in it, it would be better if they referred to the mistake of the operators and apologized. They didn’t even learn to lie beautifully.
        1. Alexander Galaktionov
          Alexander Galaktionov 4 February 2022 08: 16
          0
          It would be possible to refer to the UAV conditionally there by the Ministry of Emergency Situations or how is it with them?
          1. 1976AG
            1976AG 4 February 2022 08: 18
            +4
            Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
            It would be possible to refer to the UAV conditionally there by the Ministry of Emergency Situations or how is it with them?


            That's why I say that with the saved flight information, it would be most acceptable to refer specifically to the operator's error. They wanted to fly along the border, but did not notice the border posts)
            1. ermak124.0
              ermak124.0 5 February 2022 11: 19
              0
              1976, it works when communication is between normal people. but can a jumping in a saucepan be normal? So I don't think so...
    3. sabakina
      sabakina 4 February 2022 08: 09
      +3
      Quote: olhon
      As one of these "experts" stated, the drone shown by the Belarusians cannot be Ukrainian, because it "does not look like". laughing We disperse ...

      - Present the documents! ... The nose is not the same!
      - How not that one? belay Are you saying that I was photographed with a different nose?
      film "Take care of women."
    4. Charik
      Charik 4 February 2022 11: 57
      -1
      well, yes - no pots and forelock
  4. SAG
    SAG 4 February 2022 07: 28
    +6
    It’s like ... So you shouldn’t stop, but shoot down and land everything that approaches the border and does not respond to warnings good
    1. Nexcom
      Nexcom 4 February 2022 07: 36
      +6
      It was necessary to forcefully land and show all the logos and so on in order to fail. Although, most likely, the drone was sent without identification marks in order to just get rid of it.

      about how the Syabry themselves stuck other wings - this is certainly strong. Euro-Sumerians are adept at making excuses. right at the syabrs there is a whole workshop for the manufacture of left wings to be screwed to downed Ukrainian drones. lol and an art and design platoon - to paint tridents. laughing the numbers on the details are immediately interrupted by themselves. wassat
      1. Egoza
        Egoza 4 February 2022 07: 50
        +8
        Quote: Nexcom
        right at the syabrs there is a whole workshop for the manufacture of left wings to be screwed to downed Ukrainian drones

        Aha! They, like Icarus, attached the wings with wax, so the drone collapsed. )))
        1. Nexcom
          Nexcom 4 February 2022 07: 52
          +5
          Not wax, but fat most likely. laughing
          1. Aviator_
            Aviator_ 4 February 2022 08: 34
            +5
            Not wax, but fat most likely.

            What are you? Tse strategic material! Issued only under signature Ze!
            1. Nexcom
              Nexcom 4 February 2022 08: 35
              +3
              Well, they probably didn’t regret such a thing. lol
              The main thing is to trample the Muscovites.
              1. Prisoner
                Prisoner 4 February 2022 08: 54
                +5
                Where do they get their fat from today? And who can be trusted there to smear the wings of some garbage with LAD! laughing
      2. Alexander Galaktionov
        Alexander Galaktionov 4 February 2022 08: 00
        +2
        There are no logos on the UAV, but to show the topographic location from where it took off, who launched it and how it crossed the border with the topographic location, all doubts will disappear
        1. Nexcom
          Nexcom 4 February 2022 08: 05
          +9
          Uuuu, not a fact, they will get away. They will say - the Muscovites secretly leaked into the territory of Ukraine, launched a drone, violated the border of Belarus and now blame Svidomo. And prove it's not true! Also, LDNR people will be dragged in how to give a drink! The type of separatists assisted this provocation. Like - well, how to peacefully negotiate with the separatists after that? MH17 helped the Muscovites shoot down, they took part in a provocation with a drone. Generally...
          1. Alexander Galaktionov
            Alexander Galaktionov 4 February 2022 08: 09
            -5
            By the way, they have a UAV similar to our Orlan, they showed at the exhibition
  5. Crimean partisan 1974
    Crimean partisan 1974 4 February 2022 07: 32
    +5
    the drone shown by Belarusians cannot be Ukrainian, because it "does not look like".
    ... yes, it doesn’t matter whose ... the main thing was discovered and intercepted ... it will also be junk if
  6. Alexander Galaktionov
    Alexander Galaktionov 4 February 2022 07: 33
    -4
    Such excuses lol
    1. Crimean partisan 1974
      Crimean partisan 1974 4 February 2022 08: 04
      +6
      Such excuses
      .... why are they ... 15 pieces of greenbacks lost against the background that from the treasury millions of people are pushing it like that ... a trifle ... the main thing the junta was shown about the uselessness of drones when air defense is not asleep
  7. aszzz888
    aszzz888 4 February 2022 07: 35
    +6
    What else can you expect from these zombies? What do they confess? Because there EVERYTHING is stupidly denied. They have a teacher in this matter)) - a dog. He sticks out shameless peepers, and without paper he won’t connect two words. laughing
  8. LiSiCyn
    LiSiCyn 4 February 2022 07: 35
    +15
    I would like to contribute to the discussion that has unfolded due to the impossibility of unambiguously determining the model and belonging of the UAV that fell in Belarus.

    I would not like to state anything unambiguously (unlike the British garbage dump with a Latvian residence permit, created to legalize investigations and stuffing MI6, and already issuing this UAV as Orlan-10), however, we found at least two more Ukrainian UAVs that cannot be unambiguously identified that fell on the territory of the LPR at different times.

    All these three drones have one thing in common: the engine maintenance compartment cover is almost identical in design with a characteristic latch.

    1. UAV that crashed on the territory of Belarus in 2022.
    2. UAV that crashed on the territory of the LPR in 2021.
    3. UAV that crashed on the territory of the LPR in 2020.

    We can definitely say that such a cover with a locking mechanism of a similar design is not used on Russian UAVs of the Orlan family, but is used by Ukrainian small-scale/garage drone manufacturers.


  9. Ksanatos
    Ksanatos 4 February 2022 07: 38
    +7
    Even if ... then if ours managed to enter the territory of Ukraine, launch a drone and return back, then I have bad news for the Ukrainians.
    1. Jcvai
      Jcvai 4 February 2022 08: 22
      +4
      Do you want to surprise those who have Russian armored armies dug in near Kiev for many years?
  10. Cat Alexandrovich
    Cat Alexandrovich 4 February 2022 07: 47
    -3
    It’s interesting, but how was it intercepted, with what? How were they shot down, with what? VO could write about this? The details of what happened are very interesting.
    1. krops777
      krops777 4 February 2022 07: 54
      +7
      It’s interesting, but how was it intercepted, with what? How were they shot down, with what? VO could write about this? The details of what happened are very interesting.


      Judging by the photo, he was not shot down, but was forcibly imprisoned.
    2. Alexander Galaktionov
      Alexander Galaktionov 4 February 2022 08: 03
      +1
      Most likely with the help of electronic warfare, there is no damage from bullets and shrapnel
  11. mojohed2012
    mojohed2012 4 February 2022 08: 18
    +2
    It’s interesting when the Belarusians or the LDNR land a couple of bayraktars - they will also declare that they are not theirs, and there was nothing. And the operators who led these bayraktars are clearly being kicked in the loins by a group, because the price tag is clearly incomparable with this "mundane unknown device."
    1. Egoza
      Egoza 4 February 2022 08: 34
      +4
      Quote: mojohed2012
      And the operators who led these bayraktars are clearly kicked in the loins by a group

      Yes, in Ukraine, operators somehow disappear in an unknown direction! That's how it is with Boeing ... They look for it later, they look for it - they can't find it.
  12. sergo1914
    sergo1914 4 February 2022 08: 39
    +7
    Well, if “Glory to Ukraine” is not written on the sides, then it is not Ukrainian. It's obvious. Any expert will confirm.
    1. Tavi
      Tavi 4 February 2022 15: 54
      0
      And there is no flag, it will not even take off without it.
  13. Prisoner
    Prisoner 4 February 2022 08: 48
    +3
    winked Have their masters learned to lie so brazenly? Though these and in such business docks.
  14. Nikolaevich I
    Nikolaevich I 4 February 2022 08: 49
    +7
    "I'm not me and the horse is not mine!"
  15. tihonmarine
    tihonmarine 4 February 2022 09: 08
    +5
    In fact, the Belarusians took the fuselage from the Spectator UAV and attached wings from another drone to it in order to blame Ukraine

    If we follow the logic of Ukraine, the Belarusians stuck a mare's tail on a cow and called the cow a mare.
  16. riwas
    riwas 4 February 2022 09: 54
    +2
    Ukrainian media called "fake" statements about the UAV shot down over Belarus

    Never lie so much as before the war.
  17. Kerensky
    Kerensky 4 February 2022 10: 45
    +2
    Let's wait until they ask for a refund...
    1. Emergency
      Emergency 4 February 2022 10: 52
      0
      laughing But they will ask. Their greed is stronger than common sense. And a lot.
  18. Charik
    Charik 4 February 2022 11: 52
    -4
    Serious prejudice-Belarusian Defense Ministry accused of lying-Ukrainian-MO Foreign Ministry and media
  19. Retvizan 8
    Retvizan 8 4 February 2022 12: 57
    +3
    We have long known the price of all these Ukropov's statements: "they fired on themselves", "it's not us", "it was the Kremlin propagandists who came up with" ...
    And then they themselves burn at the level of the President of Ukraine, who declares that he knows and appreciates the people from the SBU who planned and carried out punitive operations.
  20. dimbasic
    dimbasic 4 February 2022 13: 37
    +3
    not for nothing that the Anglo-Saxons of diplomats from Belarus gathered to withdraw. how do they need this war
  21. Kolesnikov Valery
    Kolesnikov Valery 4 February 2022 15: 16
    +2
    Any devices are always being upgraded and changed, so there is no dispute about anything
    The most important thing is that everything is written inside...
    “Based on the received photographs and information from the flight controller, after processing, it is possible to compile a detailed map of the area with geodetic reference of the objects located on it,” said Maxim Chizhik, senior engineer for testing unmanned aerial systems at JSC 558 Aviation Repair Plant.
    As a result of the examination of the drone, it was established that it was programmed to work in a certain way. The route laid down initially is saved in its memory. The operation of the device in the airspace of Belarus was planned and marks were placed where it was supposed to fix a specific territory. In fact, he took 1 photo in 15 seconds, in 50 minutes of flight he took more than 200 photos.

    According to the task, it was necessary to shoot the territory in great detail - every square. This is clearly visible in the saved route.
  22. magdama
    magdama 4 February 2022 17: 07
    -4
    I have never heard a more DIBILATE anthem than the Olympic one in my life. Absolutely no melody. Coubertin booze.