Chinese spacecraft removes 'decommissioned' satellite from geostationary orbit

123

In the United States, it is assumed that China has created a tug to work in space. This is evidenced by the fact that the Chinese spacecraft Shijian-21 removed the "decommissioned" navigation satellite Compass G2 from geostationary orbit.

This is evidenced by the results of space monitoring made by the American company ExoAnalytic Solutions.



Observations showed that Shijian-22 (SJ-21) disappeared from view for several days on 21 January as it approached Compass G2. Its disappearance is explained by the fact that the docking of the two devices took place in the daytime, when the telescopes did not receive an image. But then they managed to fix the very moment of undocking, when the “dead” satellite had already been towed to the so-called burial orbit.

After completing its mission, the SJ-21 returned to geostationary orbit.

An analysis of these maneuvers led observers to believe that the purpose of the Chinese apparatus is to clear the "densely populated" geostationary orbit from space debris in order to clear the way for other satellites.

A geostationary orbit is one in which space objects move in sync with the rotation of the Earth. Thus, they are constantly above the same point on the surface of the planet. They turn on their engines to change location.

In the West, statements have appeared that China can use its spacecraft to “influence” the satellites of other countries, including the United States. In China itself, these statements have not yet been commented on.
123 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    28 January 2022 11: 15
    If they (adversaries) interfere with the Chinese on earth, then the Chinese will shoot their satellites in space ...
    It should be noted that navigation satellites hang at altitudes of 20 km. And you can’t land them with a rocket from the ground ...
    1. +4
      28 January 2022 11: 51
      Watching what to shoot. Missiles are different. For example, anti-satellite
      1. -8
        28 January 2022 12: 04
        What did "doctor" Rogozin write on Twitter?
        1. +7
          28 January 2022 12: 57
          Quote: Civil
          What did "doctor" Rogozin write on Twitter?


          He wrote that a tracking station for various space debris would be installed in Cuba. laughing In addition to the Glonass station.
          1. 0
            28 January 2022 13: 08
            Quote: slipped
            in Cuba, a tracking station for various space debris will be installed. In addition to the Glonass station.

            GLONASS is not a tracking station, but a navigation system. belay How can a tracking station for space objects complement navigation on Earth?
            1. +2
              28 January 2022 13: 53
              Quote: Hyperion
              GLONASS is not a tracking station, but a navigation system. belay How can a tracking station for space objects complement navigation on Earth?


              On Earth, GLONASS has signal correction stations. As for the tracking stations, we have had a robotic network of telescopes for a long time.
              1. 0
                28 January 2022 14: 04
                Quote: slipped
                As for the tracking stations, we have had a robotic network of telescopes for a long time.

                And what, this station (you probably mean "MASTER") also complements the GLONASS system?
                It is not clear, in general, how the stations for tracking dangerous situations in orbit will help GLONASS. Unless they warn of a possible collision with other satellites. But this, most likely, is done by the GLONASS network correction station itself.
                1. +2
                  28 January 2022 14: 07
                  Quote: Hyperion
                  And what, this station (you probably mean "MASTER") also complements the GLONASS system?


                  I mean different. For example ASPOS OKP. The GLONASS station has been located in Cuba for a long time. I wrote - in addition.
                  1. 0
                    28 January 2022 14: 09
                    Quote: slipped
                    I wrote - in addition.

                    In addition - in terms of infrastructure and scientific and technical cooperation? If so, then yes. But "in addition" one can also understand that the stations will work on common tasks.
                    1. 0
                      28 January 2022 14: 14
                      Quote: Hyperion
                      But "in addition" one can also understand that the stations will work on common tasks.


                      GLONASS always works "in addition to common tasks." You forgot that this is a civil-military system. By the way, in March, according to the plan, if they don’t replay the fact, another satellite flies - the last of the M series. This series showed that the Glonass-M spacecraft are very reliable and exceed their warranty period by two times - two of them are already more than 171 months work.
                      1. -2
                        28 January 2022 14: 42
                        Quote: slipped
                        GLONASS always works "in addition to common tasks."

                        Does he also observe space objects?
                        Quote: slipped
                        You forgot that this is a civil-military system.

                        Navigation system, not space tracking.
                      2. -1
                        28 January 2022 14: 44
                        Quote: Hyperion
                        Navigation system, not space tracking.


                        The navigation system is used in space tracking. So clear? laughing
                      3. 0
                        28 January 2022 14: 52
                        Quote: slipped
                        The navigation system is used in space tracking. So clear?

                        And how, do not enlighten?
                      4. +1
                        28 January 2022 14: 55
                        Quote: Hyperion
                        Quote: slipped
                        The navigation system is used in space tracking. So clear?

                        And how, do not enlighten?


                        ASPOS OKP includes:
                        • Main Information and Analytical Center (GIAC);
                        • Segment of monitoring dangerous situations in the area of ​​geostationary, highly elliptical and medium-high orbits;
                        • segment on calculation of parameters of solar and geomagnetic activity;
                        • a complex of specialized optical-electronic facilities (KSOES) located both on the territory of the Russian Federation and abroad.

                        The rest is on the Internet. laughing I'm talking about details. Seek and discover.
                      5. 0
                        28 January 2022 15: 07
                        The fact that ASPOS OKP exercises control over GLONASS satellites is understandable. That's what I suggested in my comment above. But how a navigation system, that is, GLONASS, can conduct observations of space is still a mystery for me, shrouded in darkness ...
                      6. 0
                        28 January 2022 15: 16
                        Quote: Hyperion
                        But how a navigation system, that is, GLONASS, can conduct observations of space is still a mystery for me, shrouded in darkness ...


                        You intend or not, perhaps really out of ignorance, but distort the meaning of what I said. Once again, for the last time, I will explain - the signals of GLONASS satellites are used in the monitoring system.
                      7. 0
                        28 January 2022 15: 23
                        Quote: slipped
                        GLONASS satellite signals are used in the monitoring system

                        In the monitoring system of ground objects and its network of satellites. GLONASS does not track other space objects. Unlike the same ASPOS OKP, which monitors many constellations of satellites, including GLONASS.
                      8. +1
                        28 January 2022 15: 26
                        Quote: Hyperion
                        GLONASS does not track other space objects.


                        This is what you came up with. I'm talking about your "surveillance of other space objects Glonass". Read yourself above. laughing
                      9. +1
                        28 January 2022 15: 36
                        Quote: slipped
                        This is what you came up with.

                        I didn't come up with anything.
                        Satellites communicate with each other and with the ground station, determining their coordinates in space and time

                        The GLONASS/GPS receiver receives signals from the nearest satellites, records the time of receipt of each signal and its content, calculates the distance to the satellites and, based on these data, determines its location in three coordinates - longitude, latitude and height above sea level. To determine the coordinates, the receiver must receive a signal from at least four satellites and calculate the distances to them.

                        Thus, GLONASS is not used for space tracking. This is the task of ASPOS OKP. Contrary to your statement:
                        Quote: slipped
                        The navigation system is used in space tracking.
                      10. 0
                        28 January 2022 15: 44
                        Quote: Hyperion
                        I didn't come up with anything.


                        I already pointed out to you where.

                        Quote: Hyperion
                        Thus...


                        Yes, not in an image, but in something like a candle. laughing

                        For the unknown - the signal from the satellites is used in the monitoring system. And spacecraft have navigation instruments. Like ground stations themselves, they need to know their exact location.
                      11. +2
                        28 January 2022 15: 57
                        Quote: slipped
                        Yes, not in an image, but in something like a candle. laughing

                        "Intellectual" humor has arrived...
                        You seem to want to pull an owl on the globe and say that since the GLONASS system monitors its satellites (25 out of the total number of satellites 44468), then this can be called "space control"?
                      12. -2
                        28 January 2022 15: 59
                        Quote: Hyperion
                        You seem to want to pull an owl on the globe and say that since the GLONASS system monitors its satellites (25 out of the total number of satellites 44468), then this can be called "space control"?


                        No, I don't want to say that. laughing Read everything I said above.
                      13. 0
                        28 January 2022 16: 03
                        Quote: slipped
                        Read everything I said above.

                        Yes, I already read it. What's the point...
                      14. 0
                        28 January 2022 16: 07
                        Quote: Hyperion
                        Yes, I already read it. What's the point...


                        Well, here is one of the old articles (2015) on the topic http://vestnik-glonass.ru/stati/glonass-dlya-kosmicheskikh-primeneniy/ I wrote to you above that there is something on the net. All your laziness. laughing
                      15. +2
                        28 January 2022 16: 11
                        The article only dreams that GLONASS will determine the trajectory of the orbits of the spacecraft.
                        Yes, many of our spacecraft, carriers, upper stages already have GLONASS receivers as part of their onboard equipment. But so far they are either auxiliary means, or are used as part of the payload. Until now, for carrying out trajectory measurements, for determining the orbits of near-Earth spacecraft, for synchronization, in most cases, ground-based means of the command-measuring complex are used, many of which have long exhausted their resources. In addition, the measuring instruments are located on the territory of the Russian Federation, which does not allow for global coverage of the entire trajectory of spacecraft, which affects the accuracy of the orbit.
                      16. -1
                        28 January 2022 16: 12
                        Quote: Hyperion
                        The article only dreams that GLONASS will determine the trajectory of the orbits of the spacecraft.


                        This is an old post from 7 years ago. Dreams have become reality. laughing And with the commissioning of new spacecraft with a hydrogen frequency standard, everything will be in chocolate.
                      17. +1
                        28 January 2022 16: 23
                        Quote: slipped
                        Dreams have become reality.

                        According to dreams, there is an article, but in reality I did not find it. Damn, suspicious...
                        Quote: slipped
                        everything will be chocolate.

                        "I know - the city will be, I know - the garden will bloom when there are such people in the Soviet country!" (With)
                      18. -2
                        28 January 2022 16: 26
                        Quote: Hyperion
                        According to dreams, there is an article, but in reality I did not find it. Damn, suspicious...


                        "If somewhere there is no one ...." laughing I think you can continue? laughing
                      19. +1
                        28 January 2022 16: 36
                        Quote: slipped
                        "If somewhere there is no one ...."

                        Not. It’s better like this: “We have such devices there! But we won’t tell you about them!” (C)
                      20. 0
                        28 January 2022 19: 03
                        Quote: Hyperion
                        Not. It’s better like this: “We have such devices there! But we won’t tell you about them!” (C)


                        I will tell. laughing Here is a link to a desktop wallpaper based on the recent release https://www.flickr.com/photos/nasa2explore/51847387490/in/photostream/ at the bottom right there is a download link as
                      21. 0
                        28 January 2022 19: 12
                        Quote: slipped
                        Here is a link to the wallpaper for your desktop

                        Beautiful ... Probably removed from the GLONASS satellite. Tracked...
            2. 0
              28 January 2022 16: 25
              Quote: Hyperion
              GLONASS is not a tracking station

              slipped seems to have written in Russian in white about the tracking station, that it is "In addition to the Glonass station", it was you who connected them into one. hi
              1. 0
                28 January 2022 16: 29
                Quote: Piramidon
                "In addition to the Glonass station", it is you who have already connected them into one.

                And here it is not. slipped himself wrote, also in Russian in white, that:
                Quote: slipped
                The navigation system is used in space tracking.

                Our navigation system is GLONASS.
      2. +2
        28 January 2022 12: 58
        Quote: vkl.47
        Watching what to shoot. Missiles are different. For example, anti-satellite


        If the missile is anti-satellite, then it can remove any satellite?

        The energy industry is different, in order to get to the geostationary orbit you need much more fuel + oxidizer.
        What different countries experienced in packets destroying satellites, then it was about fairly close orbits. Russia tested at a height comparable in height to the ISS, because of which the west raised a howl, although the orbits were different.
        Those. tested for altitudes up to 300 - 400 km.
      3. 0
        29 January 2022 12: 05
        anti-satellite missiles are designed to destroy spy satellites, RTR satellites, etc. in LEO, that is, several hundred kilometers. No rocket will reach geostationary ones.
    2. +2
      28 January 2022 12: 41
      I probably don’t understand something, but if the satellite delivered the rocket there, then the rocket can remove this satellite. I'm not talking about, of course, that the rocket will fly all "20kkm" without stopping.
      I mean, they shot them there with the Atlas, why can't some conditional "Proton" be able to "land" them?
      1. 0
        28 January 2022 13: 02
        Quote: Denis812
        I probably don’t understand something, but if the satellite delivered the rocket there, then the rocket can remove this satellite. I'm not talking about, of course, that the rocket will fly all "20kkm" without stopping.
        I mean, they shot them there with the Atlas, why can't some conditional "Proton" be able to "land" them?


        Atlos did not deliver them there.
        They are launched by a "rocket" into low orbits, then the satellite quietly sips into a distant orbit.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. 0
          28 January 2022 13: 52
          For some reason the comment was deleted.
          Maybe because of the link to the wiki, where it is clearly written that the GPS satellites were displayed by Atlases.
          1. 0
            28 January 2022 14: 45
            Quote: Denis812
            For some reason the comment was deleted.
            Maybe because of the link to the wiki, where it is clearly written that the GPS satellites were displayed by Atlases.


            They are lifted by atlases from the earth into space, into the final orbit, the geostationary one needs either some kind of additional output unit, or completely under its own power, you just need to pour more fuel into the orbit correction engines.
      2. 0
        28 January 2022 13: 48
        Quote: Denis812
        why can't some conditional "Proton" be able to "land" them?

        How much does a conditional Proton cost? And how long does it take to make it?
        1. +1
          28 January 2022 13: 51
          Конечно.
          But I don't really understand what you want to say.
          There is an American aircraft carrier and a group of aircraft on it, worth billions of dollars.
          And now what? Not create weapons against him?
          If you put the question like that, Zircons would not have appeared just.
          1. +2
            28 January 2022 13: 54
            Quote: Denis812
            There is an American aircraft carrier and a group of aircraft on it, worth billions of dollars.
            And now what? Not create weapons against him?

            A weapon against an aircraft carrier costs the same as the aircraft carrier itself?
            Are you seriously suggesting launching a Proton against every American satellite? The bill will go to hundreds, if not thousands. The navel will not untie?
            1. 0
              28 January 2022 13: 56
              I did not say that a Proton should be fired at each satellite.
              I wrote "conditional Proton", meaning that you need to have a solution, for example, your own light cleaning satellites.
              Of course, you don’t need to shoot down two-kopeck garbage with a rocket for lam bucks.
              The economy is not our forte now.
              1. -2
                29 January 2022 00: 07
                They do not understand that a satellite is equipment that does some work, for a long time, and has a large mass, including a supply of fuel. And the interceptor only needs to fly to the desired satellite, and poke into it, and then it doesn’t have to correct the orbit for years, and there’s no need to relay something, or photograph, or whatever ... The mass of the interceptor is less, and the rocket delivering the interceptor to satellite, less. "Proton", probably, from half a hundred interceptors to the geostationary will deliver, to the horror of the liberals ...
            2. -2
              28 January 2022 14: 01
              Quote: Letun
              Are you seriously suggesting launching a Proton against every American satellite?


              Yes, he screwed it up. One Soyuz-2 is enough with the Fregat missile launcher and a payload with electric propulsion propulsion engines and a recoilless gun of the Nudelman system, which was on Salyut. laughing And you can shoot satellites like in a shooting range - they are there on the GSO in a row.
              1. 0
                28 January 2022 14: 30
                I wrote "CONDITIONAL PROTON". Read the originals! :)
                that is, any rocket.
                Although the A135 - if only it flew.
                And, secondly: this did not mean the direct impact of the missile on the target.
                Not at all, as I wrote - I'm not talking about, of course, that the rocket will fly all "20kkm" without stopping
                A rocket can quite deliver something to itself that will destroy the desired target.
                1. -2
                  28 January 2022 14: 53
                  Quote: Denis812
                  I wrote "CONDITIONAL PROTON". Read the originals! :)


                  And I mean, even such a "conditional Proton" is not needed. Although there are "extra" heels of missiles left at the plant .... laughing Can it really bring such a battleship based on the Express-1000N to the GSO, with guns? a? laughing Let him fly and inspect.
                  1. 0
                    28 January 2022 14: 55
                    Well, it would have been written right away.
                    Apparatus inspector is a good idea :)
                    1. -1
                      28 January 2022 15: 07
                      Quote: Denis812
                      Well, it would have been written right away.
                      Apparatus inspector is a good idea :)


                      Inspector, but with guns. laughing
            3. +1
              29 January 2022 12: 07
              I think the Americans will bring satellites to the GSO faster than we shoot them down)))
      3. 0
        28 January 2022 14: 21
        At the meeting there will be no landing. There will be a new pile of debris (space debris) that interferes with the use of outer space. Orbits are little predictable, threats to others are great. Shooting down makes sense only in wartime. And so - it will burn in the dense layers of the atmosphere.
    3. -6
      28 January 2022 14: 55
      Quote: Alexander X
      It should be noted that navigation satellites hang at altitudes of 20 km. And you can’t land them with a rocket from the ground ...

      Already landed, S-500 ...
      1. 0
        28 January 2022 15: 10
        Write, please, which satellite C500 shot down.
        And the second - we are here about GPS that hang at 20 km.
        I ask you for a link to the material about the downing of it
        1. -1
          28 January 2022 15: 14
          Quote: Denis812
          Write, please, which satellite C500 shot down.
          And the second - we are here about GPS that hang at 20 km.
          I ask you for a link to the material about the downing of it

          Is it laziness or lack of laziness yourself? fool
          https://www.forbes.ru/society/446629-strel-ba-po-orbite-zacem-rossia-sbila-sovetskij-sputnik
          1. +2
            28 January 2022 15: 46
            Yes, I read this.
            Only nowhere does it say that the S500 shot down a satellite.
            Nudol and C550 appear.
            Where did the C500 come from? :)
    4. +2
      28 January 2022 15: 24
      How much is 20 km? belay
      1. 0
        28 January 2022 23: 43
        Quote: Andrey Moskvin
        How much is 20 km?

        Here's a good question! He [Chinese funeral master] was at the geostationary station. I decided to stretch my brain - I counted, it didn’t work out twice. I gave up, climbed into Vika - it converges there. At the same time, I learned that there are no GPSs on the geostationary, but they fly on semi-synchronous ... what
    5. 0
      30 January 2022 06: 05
      In fact, they hang at an altitude of 35 km
  2. +9
    28 January 2022 11: 21
    Universal means of docking with Ali Express.
    wassat
    1. +5
      28 January 2022 11: 57
      Universal means of docking with Ali Express.


      buyer Rogozin, Dmitry Olegovich
      Address Headquarters of Roskosmos st. Shchepkin Moscow.
      Trampoline will send later, we apologize.
      1. +2
        28 January 2022 12: 11
        A trampoline is not really needed. His still fit him.
    2. 0
      28 January 2022 14: 56
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Universal means of docking with Ali Express.

      "Pirates of the XNUMXth century"...
      1. 0
        28 January 2022 14: 58
        The starmech was a credit there, the Schwartz was resting. Yes, and there was something to neigh on the marine theme.
        1. +1
          28 January 2022 15: 09
          Quote: tralflot1832
          The starmech was a credit there, the Schwartz was resting. Yes, and there was something to neigh on the marine theme.

          Yes, and the boatswain is what you need, not to mention the Russian sailor Stetsenko ... hi
          1. -2
            28 January 2022 15: 31
            They reminded me that my personnel department inspector was Stetsenko, "Stets" is a party nickname, from Ukraine. That says it all. hi
        2. +1
          29 January 2022 00: 08
          Quote: tralflot1832
          The starmech was credited there

          He had a soldering iron in the cabin, which indicates a breadth of interests and high qualifications. I haven't met the StarMechs who keep a soldering iron in the cabin.
    3. +1
      29 January 2022 00: 10
      This mask hook should be advised, Russia has been docking in the machine for more than half a century.
  3. 0
    28 January 2022 11: 23
    . In China itself, these statements have not yet been commented on.
    . Will do as the "chosen ones" ... maybe.
    1. 0
      28 January 2022 12: 12
      Will do as the "chosen ones" ... maybe.
      ..... I believe that the striped already need to start worrying, especially since the tension in the eastern seas washing the Celestial is quite tense
      1. +2
        28 January 2022 12: 25
        They say that sometimes there is no good, right choice left ... now, we are approaching precisely such a situation that the right choice, as it seems to us / them, will no longer be good ... just NECESSARY.
        1. +1
          28 January 2022 12: 34
          what is the right choice,
          ..... it's not a matter of choice, but of the sanity and competence of those in power ... and in the Western world this is absolutely not traceable ... there is not a statement, then a bunch of water
          1. +1
            28 January 2022 13: 16
            Everything is never easy and simple.
            To understand the enemy, one must be able to see the problem on his part.
            The question is not right / wrong, good / bad .... just differently, just not the way we see something.
            1. -2
              28 January 2022 14: 44
              To understand the enemy, one must be able to see the problem on his part.
              .... well, what can I see there .... it smells of kerosene .... the opportunity to rob countries with minerals is becoming less and less, .. and those who would like to be robbed see the eye and the tooth is numb ... well, to the topic ... why the Shijian-21 spacecraft will not push the striped satellites .... after all, from the article, if it is, "that on January 22, Shijian-21 (SJ-21) disappeared from view for several days," that is, he can vacuum someone in these few days .. and then ask "WHO DID YOU UNDERSTAND THIS"
              1. -1
                28 January 2022 17: 09
                It is enough that someone has such an opportunity, but they cannot prevent it, right away.
                They will think, they will puff, they will ....
                1. 0
                  28 January 2022 17: 14
                  They will think, they will puff, they will ....
                  ....yes, it seems like they’re going to kill Russia on January 31st because they don’t want to fight with 404 ...... eeeeh .. how to fly satellites from orbit to mother earth
                  1. 0
                    28 January 2022 17: 19
                    Not the first and not the last time ... for minke whales, an attempt, not torture, it's so banal ....
                    1. -2
                      28 January 2022 17: 23
                      Not the first and not the last time.
                      ..yes, it’s time to tie up with this yoyoung office ... it’s no use from her like from a goat’s milk .... it’s fashionable to wet each other with mirror sanctions and shake cones with washing powder in front of the cameras ...... joking yes only
                      1. -1
                        28 January 2022 17: 28
                        Now they don’t even show cones, this is in the past ... hechemon said something, which means that all frogs are supposed to jump and eat flies.
                      2. 0
                        28 January 2022 17: 54
                        Now they don’t show cones either, this is in the past.
                        ..pralna ... he got the sanctions and that's it ... fuck the cones .... another thing I repeat ... there is less and less left to rob ... and more and more poops in the latrine .... the demons overlaid from all sides ... but with yoyonpomoykoy it is necessary to finish and quickly ..... there is the SCO there is the CSTO, there is the Customs Union .... in fig all these pasyo yoyon and other perversions ... well, how will it be after the spanking 31 th.. let's see
                      3. -1
                        28 January 2022 18: 02
                        Previously, they robbed, they gave beads in return, and sometimes they did without a boom.
                        Now, for nothing, they no longer give ... at least a lot, much less than necessary.
                        Times like this, business, nothing more...
                        If you delve even into their archives of analytics, recommendations and concerns from various structures, offices, then everything was a foregone conclusion not even yesterday ....
                        Politicians, such a category of "thinkers" who have an sensible thought, they have to try to find it, and even then it's not a fact that it will work out at all.
                        Here it is, for them too.
                      4. 0
                        28 January 2022 18: 19
                        Here it is, for them too.
                        .... right ... the time of the patricians in our recent history is coming to an end along the way .... no matter how scary it looks ... but the fittest and those with a vast territory will survive
                      5. 0
                        28 January 2022 21: 09
                        Patricians, this is quite exotic, which no one remembers .. except perhaps movie lovers, "Calligula", for example.
                        Now other names, although the essence is the same.
                        The rich and the poor against them ... eternal confrontation.
                      6. 0
                        29 January 2022 00: 13
                        Quote: rocket757
                        Patricians, this is quite exotic, which no one remembers ..

                        Here, Petka, a typo: not patricians, but party members. (c) lol
                      7. +1
                        29 January 2022 08: 38
                        The difference is not great .... write to the Central Committee of the party members, here are those who consider themselves new patricians ... at least, this happens not infrequently.
                      8. +1
                        29 January 2022 09: 00
                        write to the Central Committee of the party members, here are those who consider themselves new patricians ...
                        .... here Vitya is such a situation ... if the Central Committee of the Celestial Empire had not regularly cleared its ranks from embezzlers. then they would not see the "Chinese miracle" ... everything is simple there ... therefore they are rushing into space on their own ... they say they are starting to build their orbital station in orbit in one mug ... unlike the ISS, clubbing
                      9. 0
                        29 January 2022 10: 38
                        Wrote NOT RARE, i.e. it doesn't necessarily have to be that way.
                        Although, in our country, too, for the time being, the party both led and followed the designated path ... but then ...
                      10. +1
                        29 January 2022 10: 46
                        Although, in our country, too, for the time being, the party was leading,
                        ... well, so the USSR was a controlled economy along the entire vertical from consumer goods to strategic industry .. but there were no purges .. so what happened happened ... and the Celestial Empire when Xiaoping became the helm went along the Lenin NEP .. that is. ..strategic industry under the strict control of the state and the rest to entrepreneurs .... that's the whole success of the heavenly miracle ... so whoever tramples on Vladimir Ilyich is true scum .. and this must be remembered
                      11. 0
                        29 January 2022 11: 25
                        Miracles do happen...or maybe they don't.
                        The boom is objective, minke whales put their hands to the full program to the "Chinese miracle", this is in addition to everything else.
                      12. 0
                        29 January 2022 11: 30
                        minke whales put their hands to the fullest to the "Chinese miracle"
                        ..and this is why the striped Xiaoping people give a kick in the ass in the Spratly archipelago !!!...wonderful
                      13. 0
                        29 January 2022 11: 39
                        It is possible and so .... but you can read, ask how it really was.
                        The information is open, because it was and now it does not soar for anyone.
                      14. 0
                        29 January 2022 11: 57
                        and you can read, ask how it really was.
                        ... and what is there to be interested in .. The USSR, for the time being, was also friends with the West ... and with the Middle Kingdom ... well, friendship was friends ... and what in the end ..... a power with a nuclear club and even and with space trouble in orbit
                      15. 0
                        29 January 2022 12: 01
                        This is not a subject for dispute ... if you want to figure it out, there is enough information, in the public domain.
                      16. 0
                        29 January 2022 12: 11
                        if you want to understand, there is enough information,
                        ... no .. I don’t want ... there is enough knowledge of history to remember how Damansky was given to the Xiaoping people and how they are now mowing wood uncontrollably in the Far East on the territory of Russia ... so I didn’t ask for advice .... because horizons and so very broad
  4. +3
    28 January 2022 11: 25
    If this was the case, then China is ahead of the rest.
    1. +5
      28 January 2022 11: 37
      Well, it can’t be, only recently an article on VO was about what kind of Chinese drones are rubbish, and here is advanced space technology. I wonder what the Chinese phobes will say now?
      1. +3
        28 January 2022 11: 49
        Quote: Sergei Zabelin
        I wonder what the Chinese phobes will say now?

        That the entire filling of the satellite tug is imported ... wassat Or come up with something else. Where is the truth to falsehood ...
        1. 0
          28 January 2022 15: 02
          Quote: Doccor18
          That the entire filling of the satellite towing vehicle is imported ... well, or they will come up with something else

          It would be funny to shoot US satellites with devices with their own filling ... lol
      2. 0
        28 January 2022 12: 22
        https://yandex.ru/video/preview/?text=китайский%20театр%20хуняма%20видео%20смотреть&path=wizard&parent-reqid=1643361689960839-12957185749373853757-vla1-0276-vla-l7-balancer-8080-BAL-4801&wiz_type=vital&filmId=16446289065283029408
        1. -1
          28 January 2022 13: 11
          About the gray bird? wassat hi
    2. +8
      28 January 2022 12: 02
      Well... Not quite ahead.
      For example, the American satellite MEV-1 has similar capabilities.
      But it's a good thing.
      It will soon become crowded on the GEO, space debris is accumulating fairly. The place there may soon become generally scarce. Not all spacecraft have enough fuel left after completing the mission to move later to the disposal orbit. Such tugs, like the SJ-21, can become quite popular.
    3. 0
      28 January 2022 13: 23
      Quote: sledak
      then China is ahead of the rest

      The Japanese are also testing their "space janitor". In March 2021, the Astroscale ELSA-d satellite with magnetic capture was thrown into orbit from Baikonur and has already conducted a series of successful tests.
  5. +1
    28 January 2022 11: 44
    Oh, the Chinese, the working people.
  6. +7
    28 January 2022 11: 49
    the mission of the Chinese apparatus is to clear the "densely populated" geostationary orbit from space debris in order to clear the way for other satellites.
    So this is good, because there is really a lot of garbage around the Earth. The Americans should have rejoiced at the success of the Chinese, and not be afraid that it would be used against them. Do not meddle with others and no one will touch you.
  7. 0
    28 January 2022 11: 51
    For a long time it was necessary to develop such a technology and introduce it, and not suffer from Rogozin's Mars-lunar disease ..
    1. 0
      28 January 2022 13: 43
      Quote: AlexFly
      For a long time it was necessary to develop such a technology and introduce it, and not suffer from Rogozin's Mars-lunar disease ..


      In the meantime, two of Russia's latest communication satellites Express-AMU3 and Express-AMU7 are moving from their geotransfer supersynchronous orbit to the target geostationary orbit with the help of their own electric propulsion engines. The technology has been used since 2013.
      1. 0
        28 January 2022 21: 19
        Why don't the adversaries leave orbit?
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. +2
    28 January 2022 12: 07
    I wonder how the US will prove it? Or, as always, except for the Chinese and Russians, there is no one else
  10. +3
    28 January 2022 12: 14
    In the West, statements have appeared that China can use its spacecraft to “influence” the satellites of other countries, including the United States. In China itself, these statements have not yet been commented on.

    Yes, they wrote many times:
    Home page

    It's just that no one understands them... lol
  11. 0
    28 January 2022 12: 25
    Quote: mojohed2012
    A trampoline is not really needed. His still fit him.

    They need not a trampoline, but a "golden parachute". He'll definitely have this one... To jump from office without any problems.
    1. -3
      28 January 2022 13: 50
      Quote: RealPilot
      They need not a trampoline, but a "golden parachute". He'll definitely have this one... To jump from office without any problems.


      You'll manage. laughing Jump - it's there, towards the ruins. And Rogozin's "kuzkina mother" is always ready, she will soon show. laughing
  12. Two
    -2
    28 January 2022 12: 30
    And we need to sharpen the places where this rubbish falls! To be in the right place at the right time... bully
  13. -1
    28 January 2022 12: 30
    the purpose of the Chinese apparatus is to clear the "densely populated" geostationary orbit from space debris

    That's interesting. I remember as a child my house was always clean. But when mom started cleaning the apartment anyway on Saturday, dad went to the garage or to the country house, and we, the children, shook carpets on the street, moved furniture, carried chairs and tables from room to room. And if they didn’t do anything and got in the way under their feet, then they got a wet rag on the ass and again connected to the process of cleaning up.
    However, in space, orbital debris does not go anywhere, it only accumulates.
    And... this is what cleaning will look like when its day is sure to come... very interesting lol ...
  14. +9
    28 January 2022 12: 35
    A very useful companion. It is necessary to create an international team with similar devices from different countries in order to consistently remove spent or faulty satellites from orbit.
    1. +1
      28 January 2022 13: 19
      Quote: voyaka uh
      A very useful companion. It is necessary to create an international team with similar devices from different countries in order to consistently remove spent or faulty satellites from orbit.


      If, for a specific task, a geostationary satellite is "reparked" into a burial orbit, it is obvious that it is just a little lower.
      The best option is to use the orbit correction engines of the satellite itself, you just need to pump a little more fuel into it. At the end of the term, it will simply lower its orbit and turn off.

      A tug is also needed, but it's like an emergency tow truck. And cooperation is needed with understandable mutual settlements, if such a tow truck is located in some sector, then it could not only remove Chinese garbage from orbit, but also other space powers at the same time, it is beneficial for everyone.
      1. +4
        28 January 2022 13: 49
        ". At the end of the term, it will simply lower its orbit and turn off." ///
        ---
        This is if there is a connection with it and its electronics are functioning.
        But satellites often "die" in orbit. Or they don't get in touch from the start.
  15. 0
    28 January 2022 13: 10
    In the United States, it is assumed that China has created a tug to work in space. This is evidenced by the fact that the Chinese spacecraft Shijian-21 (Beidou) removed the "decommissioned" navigation satellite Compass G2 from geostationary orbit

    we also wanted to make an apparatus for this purpose.
    The Federal Space Program of Russia for 2016-2025 includes the creation by 2025 of a "cleaner" of garbage from geostationary orbits

    The device was called "Liquidator", the development was entrusted to TsNIIMash, the satellite was supposed to fly into orbit in 2025. According to the latest information, due to budget cuts, the program is suspended indefinitely (although not closed)
  16. sen
    0
    28 January 2022 13: 29
    Chinese spacecraft removes 'decommissioned' satellite from geostationary orbit

    So Russia is also working on it.
    As told to Gazeta.Ru at the head scientific institute of Roscosmos JSC TsNIIMash, the corporation is considering several options for cleaning robots. For example, the Moscow Aviation Institute (MAI) has already developed projects for a service spacecraft “with an ion beam injection system”, which will “push” space debris from the protected area of ​​the geostationary orbit (GSO) to the “cemetery orbit” (located above the GSO by 200 -300 km)
    .
    https://www.gazeta.ru/business/2021/05/19/13599368.shtml
  17. +1
    28 January 2022 15: 03
    Side to China. Recently, the James Webb telescope, almost a month after its launch, successfully completed its flight to the second Lagrange point in the Sun-Earth system and entered a working orbit around it. This is interesting, because science and knowledge of the universe.
    1. +3
      28 January 2022 15: 38
      Quote: Ezoterik
      Side to China. Recently, the James Webb telescope, almost a month after its launch, successfully completed its flight to the second Lagrange point in the Sun-Earth system and entered a working orbit around it. This is interesting, because science and knowledge of the universe.


      Yes? Then the Spektr-RG telescope, which, by the way, has been flying at this second Lagrange point in the Sun-Earth system for three years now, recently witnessed the birth of a relativistic compact object as a result of the explosion of a massive star. That's interesting.
      1. +1
        28 January 2022 15: 43
        Naturally, this is also interesting. And I know about it. I consider Einstein the destroyer of scientific and technological development, he took away our stars, if he had not happened, science would have taken a different path, and it is quite possible that worlds from other Suns would have been colonized.
        And the Webb telescope is the greatest achievement. As they say - "Good luck".
        1. 0
          28 January 2022 15: 51
          Quote: Ezoterik
          And the Webb telescope is the greatest achievement.


          There is no great achievement yet. Is it that of those who built it and started it up, or those who drool on the net at any mention of it. There, this super-expensive long-term construction has just reached orbit. Achievements have him if and will then.

          Here Hubble is an achievement. Or RadioAstron. As well as other astrophysical telescopes that are currently working.
  18. 0
    28 January 2022 23: 41
    I was more puzzled: the burial orbit! Yoshkin cat, mankind will organize a dump everywhere! sad