US State Department: Washington Security Assurance Response Won't Address NATO Issues

The topic of Ukraine's entry into the North Atlantic Alliance concerns all its members. Therefore, Washington's written response on security assurances will not address issues relating to NATO as a whole.

This was announced at a briefing by US State Department spokesman Ned Price.

He said that the United States' response to Russian security proposals would not contain Washington's position on Ukraine's prospects for joining NATO. The US State Department believes that America cannot be responsible for the entire alliance.

At the same time, Ned Price recalled that the United States opposes the revision of NATO's open door principle.

It is expected that Moscow will receive a written American response this week. A State Department spokesman promised that as soon as this happened, journalists would be immediately notified. He also assured those present that there would be nothing unexpected in the document, because Washington intends to coordinate all its proposals in advance with allies, including Ukraine.

Earlier it was reported that the US State Department, after consulting with the Ukrainian authorities, decided to add the opinion of Kiev to its response.

As The Washington Post reported, US officials asked Moscow not to make public the contents of the American response.

Comments

[SKVichyakow]

Yes, the West and Eastern Europe will not be defended, because for the "Westerners", they are second-class.

[Anachoret]

If they add the position of Ukraine in response)) it is known what letter will turn out)) and the tail and paws will be braided))

[Palmyra]

They are trying to pretend that Ukraine decides its own fate and does not want to have any relations with Russia. This should not be allowed, it turns out a deadlock and a conversation with nothing ..

[Tatyana]

US representatives turned to Moscow with a request not to make public the contents of the American response.

Such a request by the United States means only one thing, that subsequently the United States, with such a written response hidden from the world community, in principle, can always declare that
1) either there has never been any OFFICIAL response from the USA to Russia at all;
2) either as well as completely in words to abandon the true meaning of its content.

In addition, such a presentation of the case allows the United States to play for time with an allegedly OFFICIAL US response to Russia, and at this time hastily continue to pump weapons to Ukraine directly or through NATO countries.

All this allows the United States, as the American side of the military PROCA conflict in Ukraine, to escape in the world from criminal "responsibility" in organizing and instigating by Washington both a local war in Europe and TMV.

[Serg Kam]

Such a request by the United States means only one thing, that subsequently the United States, with such a written response hidden from the world community, in principle, can always declare that
1) either there has never been any OFFICIAL response from the USA to Russia at all;
2) either as well as completely in words to abandon the true meaning of its content.

Be easier.
The answer has already been given, and sent not only to Russia, but also to Ukraine.
Your conspiracy theories don't work
https://ria.ru/20220126/predlozhenie-1769703023.html

[Tatyana]

Quote: SergKam

Be easier.
The answer has already been given, and sent not only to Russia, but also to Ukraine.
Your conspiracy theories don't work
https://ria.ru/20220126/predlozhenie-1769703023.html

According to your link about Ukraine, there is absolutely nothing concrete in terms of the content of the US response to Russia.
But on the content of the US response to Russia can be seen from the content NATO's response to Russia, which copies the US response. Namely.

NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg suggested to Russia:
1. "to resume the work of NATO missions."
2. NATO/Pentagon/USA not going to compromise on the fundamentals, including an open door policy.
3. NATO proposes to discuss with Russia the issues of disarmament, transparency, deployment of missiles, arms control, non-proliferation.
4. Also offered establish a direct CIVIL line of communication under the flag and symbols of the European Union and in Brussels.

See details - RIA Novosti. 21/40/26.01.2022 22:59 (updated: 26.01.2022/XNUMX/XNUMX XNUMX:XNUMX) -
https://ria.ru/20220126/predstavitelstva-1769695845.html

[Serg Kam]

According to your link about Ukraine, there is absolutely nothing concrete in terms of the content of the US response to Russia

Of course, there is no content YET. He was just handed over, they are still getting to know him.
But what two people know, everyone knows.
And correspondingly:
- the official answer is
- it is impossible to refuse the content (because everyone knows and can make it public)

[Tatyana]

Quote: SergKam

Your conspiracy theories don't work.
Can't opt ​​out of content (because everyone knows and can publish)

Who and what exactly will be made public if the US asks not to be made public?
Ukraine will publish something against Russia? Don't make fun of my slippers!

In this case, everything i wrote:

Quote: Tatiana

NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg suggested to Russia:
1. "to resume the work of NATO missions."
2. NATO/Pentagon/USA is not going to compromise on fundamental principles, including an open door policy.
3. NATO proposes to discuss with Russia the issues of disarmament, transparency, deployment of missiles, arms control, non-proliferation.
4. It is also proposed to establish a direct CIVIL communication line under the flag and symbols of the European Union and in Brussels.

does it exclude "conspiracy", how do you say? Is it EXHAUSTING answers to Russia's questions to the US? No. And why not?
Yes, because HIDDEN meanings remain, which can only be analyzed and guessed as a CONSPIRACY! And you say that there is no conspiracy and cannot be!

Quote: Tatiana

such a statement of the case allows the United States to play for time with an allegedly OFFICIAL US response to Russia, and at this time hastily continue to pump Ukraine with weapons directly or through NATO countries.

All this allows the United States, as the American side of the military PROCA conflict in Ukraine, to escape in the world from criminal "responsibility" in organizing and instigating by Washington both a local war in Europe and TMV.

[Serg Kam]

Who and what exactly will be made public if the US asks not to be made public?

And what, the US decree for us? Do you want to say that our government unquestioningly obeys commands from Washington? And dare not disobey?
Wow.
Maybe it's not worth it to insect our power?

If something does not suit us - they will publish it, contrary to your words.
Something fundamentally does not suit Ukraine - they will publish it.
In extreme cases, they organize a leak of information.
You should not be so fanatical to believe in the hegemony of the United States ...

[Tatyana]

NATO and the US State Department simultaneously sent Russia a response to the security guarantees, asking them not to disclose the contents.

См. подробно - https://politobzor.net/245284-nato-i-gosdep-ssha-sinhronno-peredali-rossii-otvet-na-garantii-bezopasnosti-poprosiv-ne-raskryvat-soderzhanija.html?yrwinfo=1643336920645315-10436809973476165296-man1-5896-man-l7-balancer-8080-BAL-4034

And as for the DISCLOSURE of information, as they say, "An egg is precious on Christ's day", and not when you want!

[Serg Kam]

As for the DISCLOSURE of information, as they say, "A testicle is expensive on Christ's day",

Why are you doing this?
Will you prove to me that our government is absolutely dependent on the United States and will not dare to publish a letter from the United States, even if the answer does not suit us?
I don't understand your logic.

[Tatyana]

Yes, because Lavrov has already promised to do this, since open publications in the world practice of international diplomacy have so far been absolutely not accepted.

[carpenter]

At the same time, Ned Price recalled that the United States opposes the revision of NATO's open door principle.

But since 1991, not the doors, but the gates to NATO, and are no longer open, they were simply turned out and they are lying nearby, enter without an invitation, any beggar and ragamuffin.

[Uncle lee]

[
Clear ! We will tell you NO 7 times, but don't tell anyone about it!

Moscow will receive an answer this week

journalists will be notified immediately

do not make public the contents of the American response

there will be nothing unexpected in the document

[Lech from Android.]

They cheat as always, when they need to, they break their vassals over the knee ... and then you see, they need permission from NATO members.
Nothing new, the gentlemen are banking with marked cards again.

[hagen]

Quote: Lech from Android.

They swindle as always

They don't cheat. Worse...." .... In the process of preparing a response to Russia's request for security guarantees (although it is not clear what US diplomats are actually doing), the American administration is showing inappropriate disrespect and a frivolous attitude. So, at the next press briefing The representative of the State Department, Ned Price, said that the written response, as required by the Russian Federation, was not yet ready, and also said that it was known in advance that the positions and interests of not Russia, but Ukraine would be taken into account in the response...."
We can only wait and hope that the answer in such a tone will not come as a surprise to us. Our "partners" are heading for war at full speed, and 404 is going out of its way to appease its patron from behind a puddle.

[Seryoga64]

I don't understand where the logic is

A State Department spokesman promised that as soon as this happens, journalists will be immediately notified.

Will they notify that the letter was dropped into the mailbox?

As The Washington Post reported, US officials asked Moscow not to make public the contents of the American response.

Well, then why talk about a cat in a poke?

[75 Sergey]

Well, let's do it this way, the answer is known in advance, we have lost aces since the late 80s, what Humpback did not leak, then the drunk drank away, and our policy was more set up for internal use.

[Seryoga64]

Quote: 75Sergey

and our policy was more tuned for internal use.

Where they also messed up

[75 Sergey]

And the people do not like it when they steal from him and keep him for cattle.

[Seryoga64]

Quote: 75Sergey

And the people do not like it when they steal from him and keep him for cattle.

That's why these two are cursed

[75 Sergey]

there is a large list ... unfortunately.
and then the patience of the people will burst, repressions will begin and after 70 years they will again say - and whose businessmen did they fix? and bloody mode

[Seryoga64]

Quote: 75Sergey

there is a big list ... unfortunately

But these are to blame in the first place

[Daniil Konovalenko]

As The Washington Post reported, US officials asked Moscow not to make public the contents of the American response.

... A subtle hint that the information would leak out ... from other sources, so that it could be refuted ..

[APASUS]

Since NATO accepted the Baltic States (which was not ready for admission in terms of parameters), all joining the bloc is a purely political step. There is no concern for security there, it is such a camouflaged neo-colonialism.

[Andrey Grad]

At our training ground near Riga every day the guns are bang, even on Sundays, apparently they are training, getting ready. So, it was not a purely political step.

[APASUS]

Quote: Andrey Grad

At our training ground near Riga every day the guns are bang, even on Sundays, apparently they are training, getting ready. So, it was not a purely political step.

What are they preparing for? Are the Russians going to attack Riga?

[Andrey Grad]

In Riga, half of the population of us is Russian, and what if the Russian Federation remembers that Russians are held hostage by the Nazi regime here and decides to release their own?
Westerners and local Nazis still do not believe that Russia can abandon and betray its Russians, they think the Russian Federation is deceiving, this is a cunning plan, let's relax and Russia will return.
In fact, how can...

[Looking for]

well trolled RF.

[APASUS]

Quote: Andrew Grad

In Riga, half of the population of us is Russian, and what if the Russian Federation remembers that Russians are held hostage by the Nazi regime here and decides to release their own?
Westerners and local Nazis still do not believe that Russia can abandon and betray its Russians, they think the Russian Federation is deceiving, this is a cunning plan, let's relax and Russia will return.
In fact, how can...

Russia has so few problems and they decide to add more hemorrhoids to themselves

[Andrey Grad]

Well, yes, thinking about your Russians is hemorrhoids, and calculating two steps ahead is not a real task for Moscow. The Russian factor could be used to create an unfavorable situation in the Baltics, in order to counteract NATA, but silence and conciliation led to a situation where NATA modernized the entire Soviet military infrastructure in the region, added its own, equipped airfields to receive ALL types of aircraft and now deploy strike systems, which will be aimed at the entire North-West from St. Petersburg to Moscow, a matter of several days.
As a result, "hemorrhoids" will be prohibitive.

[APASUS]

Quote: Andrey Grad

Well, yes, thinking about your Russians is hemorrhoids

You mixed everything together, Russian support, military infrastructure, airfields, equipment and politics. The general result of actions and no actions.
Ours really remember their citizens at the last moment. It’s impossible to describe everything in a nutshell

[Andrey Grad]

Do not complicate, where simple.
As an example: during exercises in the Baltic States, local soldiers are not allowed closer than 20 meters to their abrams, they do not trust the locals, since local soldiers through one with Russian surnames and roots.
And Moscow, even for its own security, does not use a Russian asset behind enemy lines.

[rocket757]

. The US State Department believes that America cannot be responsible for the entire alliance.

. But this is really "cool"! .... nothing to add.

[HAM]

All the same, they want to "chat", they want to reduce everything only to Ukraine ..
It seems like they give an answer ... but about nothing .... therefore, requests for non-disclosure. Sly-faced...

[sen]

US State Department: Washington Security Assurance Response Won't Address NATO Issues

So what can you expect in response? General wishes for the continuation of the dialogue are of nothing and the US claims to Russia about its aggressiveness.

[businessv]

As The Washington Post reported, US officials asked Moscow not to make public the contents of the American response.

This is the whole point of the mattress policy! We have made our demands available for free, and minke whales are afraid of being misunderstood by the people! Swindlers of capital, damn it!

[Reserve buildbat]

They will not discuss all NATO issues. They will demand that Russia disband its "terribly aggressive" army, "Putin must go" and "Freedom for the gulffihrer - a prisoner of cowardly .... uh ... conscience!"