“They will protect and defend the port of Odessa”: foreign military experts voiced versions about the purpose of transferring 30 British special forces to Ukraine

69

As reported at the end of the working week in reports coming from the territory of Ukraine, Britain sent 30 of its troops to this country. These are the soldiers of the elite special forces, the so-called rangers. They arrived in Ukraine on one of the military transport aircraft, which, among others, delivered Swedish-designed anti-tank missile systems to Kiev.

In this regard, military experts both in Ukraine and in Britain itself are discussing the advisability of sending 30 special forces troops from the United Kingdom. In this regard, various versions are voiced. Let's present the versions expressed by foreign military experts in this material.



First version. According to her, British special forces were sent to Ukraine as a "front" when sending a much larger number of the United Kingdom's military. Allegedly, this is why about a dozen military transport aircraft of the British Air Force were sent to Kiev within a week. According to this hypothesis, up to several companies of military personnel could be transferred to Ukraine from the UK without advertising, which will be used to guard and defend key facilities in which London has a direct interest. In particular, we are talking about large airports, as well as port infrastructure, including the port of Odessa. In addition, it was noted that the mentioned 30 British rangers will be involved in the protection and defense of the Odessa seaport.

Version two. Sending anti-missile systems with a target range of no more than 1 km and 30 rangers is the move of British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, which is designed to demonstrate “support” to Ukraine without actually having it. Supporters of this version say that 30 British special forces in the event of real hostilities are a drop in the ocean, and they will leave Ukraine much faster than the military left Afghanistan.

Third version. This is a signal to Russia that Britain has its own interests in Ukraine. This is a kind of "marker of the territory", which London has already "chosen". At the same time, supporters of such a theory admit that such “British marks” in Ukraine are unlikely to make any serious impression on Russia.
69 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +24
    22 January 2022 08: 17
    30 Spartans British save Odessa from Russian invaders!
    Canvas. Butter.
    The birth of a new Tales legends.
    1. +13
      22 January 2022 08: 22
      Do English commandos on the territory of occupied New Russia immediately wear women's clothing? Or just waiting for danger?
      1. +5
        22 January 2022 08: 27
        Bearded women? Hijabs are not worn there laughing
        1. +13
          22 January 2022 08: 47
          The laurels of Goebbels do not give peace to the impudent Britts: "the more impudent the lie, the more they believe in it"!
          30 "specialists" will guard the Odessa port? Do they even represent the territory of the latter? The money bag in the country even has more security!
          So, they are trying to stake out until the rest of the applicants have pinned down.
          1. 0
            24 January 2022 16: 31
            I am sure that it was sent to / to Ukraine much more British military. And - at the right moment - they will all appear, appear like the devil out of a snuffbox! Which moment? The occupation of Ukraine by selected NATO troops at the invitation of the Ukrainian authorities! negative
            1. 0
              24 January 2022 19: 35
              Quote: Vladimir Mashkov
              The occupation of Ukraine by selected NATO troops at the invitation of the Ukrainian authorities!

              NATO has extra 200 300-000 XNUMX troops for the occupation???
              You can’t get off with less - a large country with a decent population ...
              Given the fact that there will be partisans, perhaps more will be needed ...
              1. 0
                24 January 2022 19: 42
                Quote: your1970
                does NATO have extra 200-300 troops for occupation ???

                What nonsense? For starters, ten times less is enough. Moreover, their already a lot in / in Ukraine. Again, loyal authorities and the police apparatus to help.
                1. 0
                  24 January 2022 20: 14
                  Quote: Vladimir Mashkov
                  Enough to get started tenfold smaller quantity. Moreover, there are already a lot of them in / in Ukraine. .

                  -that is, in your opinion, at least 20 is still necessary? 000-100-200 will not do the weather?

                  Quote: Vladimir Mashkov
                  loyal authorities and the police apparatus to help.

                  And yes - the Wehrmacht did not think so - having an absolutely loyal government and a police apparatus

                  I'll just remind you - they had such Sashko Bily - a hero of heroes. He stuck his nose in the wrong place - and immediately killed himself in the presence of the police with two shots
                  Therefore, I won’t be surprised if NATO is not enough to occupy the country 404 and 500
      2. +9
        22 January 2022 08: 50
        Quote: Nikolai S.
        Do English commandos on the territory of occupied New Russia immediately wear women's clothing? Or just waiting for danger?

        Not! Only Scottish kilts. )))
        But in general, here is the "port security" so that the latter is not dragged away, it is quite possible. Defense is highly questionable.
        1. +5
          22 January 2022 08: 58
          creatures flocked
      3. +2
        22 January 2022 11: 40
        Quote: Nikolai S.
        do they wear women's clothing?

        They have a veil in a backpack zanykan.
    2. +21
      22 January 2022 08: 33
      The British are masters of bloody provocations... in Yugoslavia, Libya and Syria, they were marked by such deeds.
      Therefore, if something similar to the explosion of a chemical plant or something similar happens in Ukraine, and at the same time the Western media blames all this on Russia, then we must immediately look for traces of the British in this matter ... they know how to spoil on the sly.
      1. +5
        22 January 2022 08: 58
        Crap on the sly, the only thing they know how. Or transform into women's clothing when escaping.
        1. +2
          22 January 2022 21: 09
          In which case, they will be searched for in the catacombs for a very long time. And unsuccessfully.
      2. +1
        22 January 2022 16: 46
        From the analysis of the European media and the English newspapers "The Observer", "The Guardian", "The Daily Telegraph", as well as the media of Novorossia, it follows that at present there are several hundred military personnel (the figure flashed 800 people). Among them are specialists in the management of aviation forces and means, pilots, advisers, instructors, operatives, intelligence officers, sabotage groups, specialists in the use of weapons of mass destruction, snipers, etc.
    3. +2
      22 January 2022 08: 35
      ... and a storm in the port of Balaklava...
      1. +2
        22 January 2022 08: 46
        Storm or assault? smile
        Rather, the Ukrainians themselves will be thrown under the distribution under the guidance of these same British specialists.
        The British will not fight directly with us ... but they do not feel sorry for the local natives.
    4. -5
      22 January 2022 10: 05
      Quote: Victor_B
      30 British Spartans save Odessa from Russian invaders!


      This is obviously not enough in this case. Rather, they are kept there to cover the evacuation by sea of ​​someone from the mainland, if the "hot scenario" is realized.
    5. -2
      22 January 2022 16: 55
      Canvas. Oil. I can't stand the Odessa dialect. So creepy and so interesting
  2. +10
    22 January 2022 08: 18
    There is another version - to ensure evacuation. It was the same in Afghanistan, the "providers" flew in the same way. And this is no longer the "Afghan version", this is already a fait accompli. So there is a place to be.
    1. +3
      22 January 2022 09: 15
      It is even possible to evacuate not only the embassy, ​​but also the government of Ukraine along with Zelya. And they will have a government "in exile" following the example of Poland-39.
    2. +1
      24 January 2022 00: 56
      The main thing is that they do not arrange a man-made disaster ...
      1. +1
        24 January 2022 07: 33
        Quote: Palmyra
        The main thing is that they do not arrange a man-made disaster ...

        Biological, laboratories have not gone away.
  3. +9
    22 January 2022 08: 23
    Here and on .. why do I need them here ??? am fool
    - Monya, and sho?!
    - What about me? Guilty?, why are they building Ukraine around Odessa?! (With)
    1. 0
      24 January 2022 00: 59
      Odessa key region, sea, Transnistria, port. Go find out what they're up to..
  4. +2
    22 January 2022 08: 25
    The fact that the Western pack conceived a provocation is beyond doubt Yes .And these 30 warriors were sent in case of an emergency evacuation of the subjects of the queen, if you still manage to drag the Russian Federation into the war, nothing new, the Englishwoman, as always, crap requestThe hedgehog understands that Ukraine will be returned to Russia, the only question is the methods, the states and NATO were given harsh conditions, but to return it peacefully, this is not about the West, it is much more interesting for them to unleash a big massacre, of course they will dump it themselves, this is beyond doubt, but sanctions for the Russian Federation will be , it’s not for nothing that everyone as one talks about the Russian invasion Yes angry
    1. +6
      22 January 2022 08: 54
      Quote: Hto tama
      And these 30 warriors were sent in case of an emergency evacuation of the subjects of the queen,

      Well, yes. Odessa is a port, maybe some kind of boat will be thrown for their export .... er ... gentlemen, while the rest will hope for helicopters.
    2. 0
      24 January 2022 01: 01
      If you poke a bear with a stick for a long time, then sooner or later the bear will not stand it ...
  5. +6
    22 January 2022 08: 25
    They will work as a scarecrow there, like - you can’t come here! There are rabbits here!.. pah! - NATO members ... (what if it works out)
  6. +5
    22 January 2022 08: 30
    I remember that in 2014 after the Crimea, the liberals howled - who needs this Ukraine, no NATO troops will be there, all this, they say, is the Kremlin's fairy tales. Not even 10 years have passed, and the whole of Ukraine is covered with small bases of the US and Great Britain.

    Attention, question. Against whom did all these guys gather there, and for what purpose?
    And the second question, more serious, so to speak, but don't you think that making money in Russia, spending in the West and at the same time defending the interests of Russia will not work?
    1. -4
      22 January 2022 08: 38
      Attention, question. Against whom did all these guys gather there, and for what purpose?

      Isn't it obvious? Against Moldova, of course.

      And the second question, more serious, so to speak, but don't you think that making money in Russia, spending in the West and at the same time defending the interests of Russia will not work?

      Where to spend them and for what?
      You also spend money abroad. Indirectly, but still. Or do you think that everything you buy is made in Russia from Russian components and materials?
    2. -2
      22 January 2022 15: 27
      And I have a counter question, whose fault is it in the end that US and British troops appeared in Ukraine? These same liberals, led by the Chief Liberal, essentially placed them there with their stupid extravagant actions
  7. +4
    22 January 2022 08: 32
    This is a signal to Russia that Britain has its own interests in Ukraine.

    So it has long been known
  8. +5
    22 January 2022 08: 38
    Wow, a whole platoon laughing
    Oh, and they will fight. Although, most likely, these are fat London pensioners who arrived at the resort, and then immediately "English special forces-special forces"
  9. +6
    22 January 2022 08: 43
    Well, to protect such a large object as a port with 30 commandos seems unreasonable. But the fact that these 30 special forces can train the military how to use these anti-tank systems is quite possible .. the complex is very easy to manage and several hundred people can be trained within a week
  10. +3
    22 January 2022 08: 44
    Rather, protect the cargo that they brought and climb on the front line teaching their special equipment, and the Ukrainians, well, just a convenient training ground and not far to go.
  11. -1
    22 January 2022 08: 48
    Why so many? Three would be enough. Terminators, dude.
  12. Eug
    +2
    22 January 2022 08: 53
    Rather, not to guard and defend, but to incapacitate if it is possible to capture, i.e. to mine and undermine with infliction of maximum damage. But how will the owners of those objects that are going to destroy, for example, private cargo terminals, look at this? I do not think that they will be delighted even with the prospect of mining their property. But for hydroelectric power plants, options are possible, especially if there are more than 30 British. And what kind of "rangers" are in the British Armed Forces? It seems there were SAS and SBS ...
    1. +1
      22 January 2022 19: 39
      - In August 2021, the Ranger Regiment was formed

      - And Patfinder s is just a platoon ... As part of the 16th air assault brigade.
      1. Eug
        0
        22 January 2022 23: 18
        Thanks, I somehow missed this post.
    2. 0
      24 January 2022 19: 47
      Quote: Eug
      and incapacitate if it is possible to capture, i.e. mine and undermine with infliction of maximum damage.

      "If anyone ... ever ... even with a finger .." © Moscow does not believe in tears
      At the slightest attempt to do something with the port, this special forces will immediately leave home ... in a container ..... in small cuts of meat or in jars of sausage ...
      I can see how serious people-owners will allow the port to be blown up, yeah ...

      The only option is protection during the evacuation of local oligarchs, no more
  13. -1
    22 January 2022 08: 57
    Britain sent 30 of its troops to this country.

    The nerds arrived, .. everything went as expected.
  14. 0
    22 January 2022 09: 04
    They won't protect anything. These are specialists and instructors of those tons of weapons that have recently been transferred to Ukraine.
    1. +1
      22 January 2022 12: 39
      Quote: Troll
      They won't protect anything.

      A sort of anti-CSTO. For they arrived not to put out the fire, but, on the contrary, to splash gasoline. Yes fellow
  15. +3
    22 January 2022 09: 05
    There are NO rangers in the British Armed Forces. This is an American term. The British call their own by another name - Pathfinder.
    In general, here we can talk about the British special forces of the fleet - SBS.
  16. +1
    22 January 2022 09: 33
    Version two. Sending anti-missile systems with a target range of no more than 1 km and 30 rangers is the move of British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, which is designed to demonstrate “support” to Ukraine without actually having it.

    No. According to media reports.
    The UK has decided to put its covert SAS unit on standby. He may receive an order to evacuate diplomats from the territory of Ukraine, reports Mirror

    https://riafan.ru/1592099-mirror-velikobritaniya-podgotovilas-dlya-evakuacii-svoih-diplomatov-s-ukrainy.
  17. -2
    22 January 2022 09: 41
    That is, no one perceives these British as specialists for sabotage against our Black Sea Fleet, right? Exclusively as stupid guards of port warehouses and rusty cranes? Oh, yes, their main mission is just a target for another portion of the sparkling humor of couch warriors in VO ..) Well, that's right .. burning in tanks from English gifts to Ukraine in case of boiling will, of course, not you and me, dear comedians, and boys unfamiliar to us from a neighboring street ..
    1. 0
      22 January 2022 10: 01
      In our Black Sea Fleet, in the security service, also not "snotty" boys serve. And they know how to act. And for some reason you assume that Russia will go for a breakthrough with tank columns. It is easier to bleed the enemy, destroying them in places of deployment, with rocket and bomb strikes from the territory of Russia.
      1. -3
        22 January 2022 10: 32
        Rocket and bomb strikes ... Oh, are you talking about the Iskanders being transferred closer to Ukraine and missiles for them, which are being transported in wagons from under the coal? I saw such pictures .. What's with our people? You won’t keep any military secrets with them - some scumbag will definitely remove either a railway train from the bridge, or a column on the march from the window of his car .. - and immediately let’s spread it on the Internet .. Would they write a criminal article. .for Internet espionage..)
  18. +1
    22 January 2022 09: 43
    Small-shaven people are trying to make an empire out of themselves. laughing
  19. +1
    22 January 2022 09: 50
    30 Britons will most likely keep an eye on the Ukrainian military so that they do not run away or give up the port at the first nix.
  20. +2
    22 January 2022 09: 56
    Do not take alive in case of captivity, send to Siberia and no agreements on transfer. This is the only way to discourage the future to poke your nose into other people's affairs.
  21. +1
    22 January 2022 09: 58
    I think that this is purely moral support, only with the first shot they quickly collect the belongings and get away
  22. +3
    22 January 2022 10: 32
    Third version. This is a signal to Russia that Britain has its own interests in Ukraine. This is a kind of "marker of the territory", which London has already "chosen".


    As you fell in love, so it will be blown away ...
  23. 0
    22 January 2022 10: 34
    order in the country cannot be ensured. mess will abide
  24. +2
    22 January 2022 10: 45
    Defend?... Port?... From the Russians? laughing Yes, you drive!
  25. 0
    22 January 2022 11: 01
    "They will guard and defend the port of Odessa" ... This is some "territory mark", which London has already "chosen"
    Didn't the English dog mark the territory too small? That way at the level of the Yorkshire Terrier is not higher. Ukrainians, of course, are delighted - another contender "marked the territory" (politely described)
  26. 0
    22 January 2022 12: 20
    In this regard, military experts both in Ukraine and in Britain itself are discussing the advisability of sending 30 special forces troops from the United Kingdom.
    The situation is interesting, 30 British rangers will protect Ukraine from Russian attack, and 1100 rangers in Afghanistan not only failed to protect Afghanistan from the Taliban, but fled even before the US rangers. Emboldened.
    1. +7
      22 January 2022 16: 07
      Yes, what is there to protect. They will drink local vodka, assure the natives of eternal friendship and mutual assistance, pat on the shoulder and drive off back to their island.
      1. 0
        22 January 2022 19: 18
        Quote: Astra55
        pat on the shoulder and drive back to their island.

        Kiss with Afro-Shaves.
  27. +1
    22 January 2022 13: 24
    “They will protect and defend the port of Odessa”: foreign military experts voiced versions about the purpose of transferring 30 British special forces to Ukraine
    Lie. They will just spoil us, in a big way, as always. request
  28. +2
    22 January 2022 13: 34
    Trouble, trouble, well, that's it ... What to do now? As many as 30, well, or 300, SAS, Ukraine is safe (which no one even thinks of attacking))
  29. SIT
    +1
    22 January 2022 20: 30
    So what do you want for this machine gun of yours? Shaw!? I'm telling you for a machine gun, and not for a penthouse in Piccadilly in your London! Give me a real price! Benya, look at these idiots! They still think to throw me for pennies! Yes, I traded whips on Privoz for 30 years, and these Britons want to sell me their machine gun for the price of a James Bond car!
  30. 0
    23 January 2022 08: 28
    It's just that in country 404 the cost of sexual services is not high. So the kingdom decided to send its soldiers, who had been sitting in tolerant Europe and Albion, on vacation.
  31. +2
    23 January 2022 12: 37
    England at war with Russia? No. This means that captured British soldiers with weapons in their hands will be shot on the spot, like terrorists.
    1. +2
      23 January 2022 15: 11
      Like foreign mercenaries.
  32. +1
    23 January 2022 12: 43
    What nonsense. They will guard Odessa. Stupidity, for fairy-tale characters.
  33. +2
    23 January 2022 21: 21
    It would be necessary to organize the protection of these 30 half-iks by the police. The Odessa crooks will rob these servicemen to their underwear.
  34. +1
    23 January 2022 23: 32
    The Wehrmacht took a more serious approach to the issue of defending Odessa from the "wild hordes of Russians", and then, draping, they did not have time to pull up the panties full of adrenaline