The Week: Ukraine does not deserve NATO protection
Despite statements about the threat of a Russian invasion, neither the US nor NATO is ready to defend Ukraine. And if the West cannot or does not want to protect Ukrainian democracy, then, in fact, it does not need Ukraine, writes the author of an article for the British edition of The Week.
Neither the United States nor NATO are ready to send their troops to Ukraine, and sanctions against Russia have long lost their effectiveness, the author writes. Washington's reluctance to use the army in a situation with a Russian invasion shows the real attitude of the United States towards Ukraine. In all cases, when America wanted to influence events, the American army was launched to defend the US position. But not in this case.
The modern vision of the situation is mainly based on the consequences of the Second World War and the Cold War. The thinking of the modern layman is trying to fit the current events into the framework of the past, dividing the whole world into white and black, where Russia is inevitably an evil empire, and Putin is a tyrant who wants to conquer the whole world.
However, this is not the case, the author claims. Attempts to divide the world into good and bad have already cost the US a lot of money and a lot of blood in the Middle East. There is a strong possibility that the United States is overestimating Ukraine as a democratic state, saying that everything told about the Ukrainian regime with its shortcomings is just “disinformation” for Russia. In fact, the admission of Ukraine to NATO is fraught with consequences that will have to be dealt with for quite a long time.
Instead of accusing Russia of "disinformation", the United States needs to discuss with its allies the costs and problems that the current Ukrainian government will bring with it. It is possible that Ukraine did not deserve the protection of NATO, sums up the author of a major British edition of The Week.
Information