The American edition called rockets and artillery the main advantage of Russia over Ukraine

58

Russia can ensure a rapid advance deep into Ukraine, turning its skies into a no-fly zone. Foreign Policy author Jack Detch is convinced of this. He believes that Russian missiles will shoot down Ukrainian aircraft and attack military installations on the ground. According to the observer, Russia allegedly sent Iskander missiles to the border with Ukraine, which were used in Syria.

According to sources in the American press, the Iskanders are being transferred to the front line, covered with a tarpaulin. Weapons specialists allegedly managed to discern the contours of the Iskander missiles under the tarpaulin. The United States considers these missiles one of the most effective Russian weapons. Also, Americans are impressed with the accuracy of Russian missiles due to their connection to the latest radar systems.



The American publication also refers to the data of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, which allegedly reports the transfer of 36 Iskander missiles to the country's borders. The Ukrainian military fears that some of these missiles could hit Kiev. The country's air defense system will not be able to cope with this threat, many independent experts say.

Detch also emphasizes the particular danger of using the Iskanders in combination with other weapons, including the Hurricane, as well as heavy flamethrowers. The complex use of various weapons and missile systems would simply disorganize the Ukrainian defense system.

The United States, writes Detch, has "relaxed" greatly since the 1990s, mistaking the collapse of the Soviet Union for the final defeat of Russia, the restoration of power of which could no longer follow in the future. However, the 2000s showed that Washington was wrong. After Vladimir Putin came to power, Russia began to rapidly restore its military power. The country had new weapons, old systems were being upgraded. Ultimately, American military experts were forced to admit that the Russian artillery arsenal was superior to the American one. As retired Lieutenant General Ben Hodges, who once led US forces in Europe, pointed out, artillery is Russia's longtime asset. Thanks to long-range fire systems, Russia can shell the territory of Ukraine without even crossing the border, as well as operate from ships stationed in the Sea of ​​Azov, the general said.

Also, the American edition did not forget about another threat to the United States, this time in the Middle East. Iran, according to US experts, is also developing offensive missile weapons to threaten US bases and allied facilities in the Arabian Peninsula and Israel.
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +22
    21 January 2022 10: 52
    Plain American stupidity. The main advantage is that more than half of the population of Ukraine will welcome the reunification of the country
    1. -1
      21 January 2022 11: 11
      More than half of the country is negatively disposed towards Russia. consequences of propaganda. I hope that half of the population will be neutral at best. But there are a million scumbags out there. Remember, there are no pro-Russian forces there
      1. +17
        21 January 2022 11: 19
        There are pro-Russian people, but they are not organized and generally do not advertise their views.
        1. +4
          21 January 2022 13: 13
          I already wrote about my four fellow students, born in the RSFSR, with a Soviet upbringing, by distribution there. Three "Bandera bitten." For thirty years, two generations have already grown up there, with an attitude towards Russia, at best, like freeloaders. You didn't convince me
          1. +4
            21 January 2022 14: 01
            I do not convince. Sharing observations from the scene
            1. 0
              21 January 2022 14: 07
              Location of events? Kiev, Vinnitsa, Dnepropetrovsk?
              1. 0
                21 January 2022 14: 39
                Are you trying for the SBU?
                1. -1
                  21 January 2022 16: 34
                  No, just a reasonable vision of the situation. But the man did not answer. Observer, man.
      2. +1
        21 January 2022 12: 16
        Quote: 210ox
        More than half of the country is negatively disposed towards Russia. consequences of propaganda. I hope that half of the population will be neutral at best. But there are a million scumbags out there. Remember, there are no pro-Russian forces there

        Negatively related to Russia, I think 30%, the rest are silent and pro-Russian, so it will be more accurate. The last sentence is redundant.
        1. -4
          21 January 2022 13: 17
          No, not too much. Name at least one politician. Tsarev & Co. God forbid. They are the first to merge. Silent and waiting mass, waiting for goodies is not a force
          1. +1
            21 January 2022 14: 01
            Quote: 210ox
            No, not too much. Name at least one politician. Tsarev & Co. God forbid. They are the first to merge. Silent and waiting mass, waiting for goodies is not a force

            But it is not an anti-power either.
            1. -1
              21 January 2022 16: 31
              Do we need this "power" (freeloaders a la Golubkovs)? I support the return of Donbass within the administrative boundaries of the Luhansk and Donetsk regions of Russia. Let the rest take care of itself.
              1. +2
                22 January 2022 01: 50
                Quote: 210ox
                I support the return of Donbass within the administrative boundaries of the Luhansk and Donetsk regions of Russia. Let the rest take care of itself.

                So everyone is supportive. Only this does not solve the problem of Russia's security. Partially, the problem will be solved if the entire South-East goes to Russia (at least as part of, at least in the form of Novorossia). Thus, completely cutting off the Khokh-lov from the sea, and pushing the border at least to the Dnieper.
      3. -2
        21 January 2022 14: 13
        UKHRA IS ALREADY IN A VICTORIOUS STAND: THEIR REARS ARE TO Canada, and the Buryats can retreat only to UlanUde.
        Putin will lose on the outskirts. that's why he didn't attack. the determination of the democratic world to defend the Outskirts will outweigh all the dirty molecules of Gazprom and the attacker army.
        Behind us are Moscow and the Arbat ... AND BEHIND THE UHRAS - BROADWAY AND KANSAS.
    2. -2
      21 January 2022 11: 40
      "Power is in the truth!" (With)
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Rg2COE7Ybg
      1. +9
        21 January 2022 11: 50
        and the overwhelming advantage in aviation is garbage
    3. -2
      23 January 2022 01: 02
      This is not true and is the result of internal propaganda in the Russian Federation.
      For NOBODY has any desire to join your CURRENT system.
      Because this is the same as what we have now. Controlled corruption system. Kleptomania. Oligarchs. Populism.
      Only much tougher on crime. With a bunch of bonuses in the form of black visitors. With a lot of hardening. With tighter nuts. With a terrible quarantine in general on the verge of an emergency and frenzied forced vaccinations. Etc. etc.
      Now, if you were like in Belarus. With their attitude towards covid... with their foundations. With the president, who has been ill twice, but is always positive ON ALL ISSUES. Etc. etc.
      Then it would be a completely different conversation.
      And so ... in the current situation - generally do not care. You can take it by force. You are welcome. And also puff. Or you may not take it. And also puff.
      For as long as the essence of management and the system is identical ... then it does not matter who exactly will rob us. Still, it will flow over the hill. So what's the difference.
      1. -1
        23 January 2022 13: 07
        Got sick? Get well.
      2. KCA
        +1
        25 January 2022 13: 48
        Name, please, at least one oligarch in the Russian Federation? If you know, of course, what an oligarchy is and who the oligarchs are
        1. 0
          25 January 2022 21: 55
          Oligarchy is a type of autocracy in which state power is in the hands of an irremovable small group of people.
          Examples? Well, for example, the one to whom they refused to sell the plant, and the governor thundered in a pre-trial detention center. Or the bunch that pushed through the changes in a roundabout way to make a lifelong prisoner.
          Or Medvedev's group, which still holds more than a third of the real feeding places in the Cabinet. Or a bunch of fat pigs who actually hold the most basic financial and resource flows in their hands, which actually have a significant impact in the field of management. Or do you think that a colossal influence on the economic system is not power?
  2. +5
    21 January 2022 10: 53
    Apparently the rating of this American edition is low. Therefore, the analysis is shallow. Yes, and possession of the entire volume of information on this topic is very weak.
    1. +2
      21 January 2022 10: 59
      Quote: smel
      Apparently the rating of this American edition is low. Therefore, the analysis is shallow.

      Perhaps the opposite. What an analysis, such a rating. And knowledge of the subject from a wiki article has long been a familiar phenomenon.
    2. +12
      21 January 2022 11: 05
      How can you see the contours of missiles under a tarpaulin if the missiles themselves are placed under a flat metal casing of the installation? Morons.
      1. +9
        21 January 2022 14: 21
        Just like you can threaten only from the Sea of ​​Azov.
        The Black Sea is not yet open to American understanding.
  3. +9
    21 January 2022 10: 54
    This is who there is such a curious peeped under the tarpaulin? How else did they not remember about submarines! "The Russian submarine is moving along the path indicated by SP 2! That's why it was laid!" ))) And about rockets - yes! THINK before it's too late.
    1. +7
      21 January 2022 11: 19
      Quote: Egoza
      "The Russian submarine is moving along the path indicated by SP 2! That's why it was laid!"

      I got it! In the Far North, our troops are advancing exclusively along the migration path of reindeer, and on the Ukrainian border, our troops, concentrated for aggression, are guided by gopher burrows.
      It was in the West that our main military secrets were revealed. crying
  4. +3
    21 January 2022 10: 57
    How? And yesterday they said that the Black Sea nuclear submarines, and tomorrow what? Obviously, they didn’t conduct exercises, they destroy the column in 30 seconds.
    1. +2
      21 January 2022 11: 06
      36 Iskander missiles
      Submarine + Iskander and Khan of the Armed Forces of Ukraine! bully
      1. -1
        21 January 2022 12: 00
        The article compares Russia and the USA. No matter how many Iskanders we have, there are no more of them than tomahawks.
        1. +1
          21 January 2022 20: 03
          the main advantage of Russia over Ukraine, where does the United States with axes?
  5. +5
    21 January 2022 11: 01
    Americans are also impressed by the accuracy of Russian missiles.

    something impressionable hurts .... and they replicate their impressionability to the world ....
    1. +5
      21 January 2022 11: 52
      let them not climb, and there will be nothing to be impressed with! Vasya hi
      1. +4
        21 January 2022 13: 13
        Yes, they will find ... it's in their blood ... wassat
        Novel, hi
        1. +3
          21 January 2022 14: 02
          no need to find!
          1. +4
            21 January 2022 14: 14
            If they don't find it, they'll figure it out... Yes
            1. +1
              21 January 2022 14: 41
              I think they have thought of everything for a long time, and now there is only preparation for execution. And all the noise around is just tinsel that hides what was conceived in the USA. And as more and more large weapons arrive in increments, the time of readiness will be seen.
  6. +3
    21 January 2022 11: 04
    Russian missiles will shoot down Ukrainian aircraft
    It is imperative that if the Ukrainian side starts to make sudden gestures in the Donbass, since many missiles will not be required, because "King" is naked. You read the American media and conclude that Ukraine, in any case, is a loser. So why push an entire country to destroy its army? To be fair, Ukraine itself can’t wait to test the strength of the Russian army, get a good punch in the teeth, back off and tell the Americans that we (Ukrainians) did everything we could.
    1. +2
      21 January 2022 11: 19
      Quote: rotmistr60
      why

      Ukrainianism was invented for the war against Russia, this is its essence and only purpose.
      Accordingly, the state of Ukraine is intended only to kindle the fire of a fratricidal war, and eventually burn out in it, but in such a way as to cause Russia as much damage as possible. Which is what they are trying to do.
  7. 0
    21 January 2022 11: 16
    The American edition called rockets and artillery the main advantage of Russia over Ukraine
    . Okay, so be it ... let them fantasize, build forecasts, if they have nothing else to do.
  8. -3
    21 January 2022 11: 22
    36 Iskander missiles 

    Oh how scary!
    And if you think about it, then this is the ammunition load of a pair of aircraft.
  9. 0
    21 January 2022 11: 29
    A new level of intimidation for Westerners...
  10. 0
    21 January 2022 11: 31
    The main advantage is our gunners and missilemen. And our weapons developers, of course.
    1. -3
      21 January 2022 13: 27
      Do you think that the RF Armed Forces have sufficient ammunition? For example, the famous PVZ ZiF, fuses, etc. - there is none! Prommash, Saratov, shells - the market is there now. "Do not cry, Alice, you have become an adult .."
      1. 0
        22 January 2022 19: 48
        Quote: HefeДМБ69
        Do you think that the RF Armed Forces have sufficient ammunition? For example, the famous PVZ ZiF, fuses, etc. - there is none! Prommash, Saratov, shells - the market is there now. "Do not cry, Alice, you have become an adult .."

        Enough BZ))) Dispose of longer than use)))
  11. +1
    21 January 2022 11: 43
    Russian missiles will shoot down Ukrainian aircraft


    ..... of which there are a great many and all the latest.
    They really think that something will take off there, if it starts, what they dream about so ...
  12. 0
    21 January 2022 12: 02
    Thanks to long-range fire systems, Russia can shell the territory of Ukraine without even crossing the border.

    Maybe something can ... who would argue ... But there is still a question - why? And - will it?
  13. -5
    21 January 2022 12: 32
    The American edition called rockets and artillery the main advantage of Russia over Ukraine

    Very strange, just yesterday they were submarines ... hiding deep in shallow water. Now rockets with cannons - firecrackers. I believe that the next "expert" statement of this kind is already betting. What will be more dangerous tomorrow, that is the question - a Kalashnikov assault rifle or a cardboard BMP-2, which is the same massive today ... with a disposable luminous engine and unbalanced crankshaft torques of the 3rd, 4th and 5th degree, which is is one of the guarantees of its well-known "reliability" and "operability". I bet on the BMP, it is undoubtedly very dangerous today ... first of all, for those who dare to go into battle on it.
    Maidan urks with elven arrows are not the Papuans of New Guinea from 2014, are they?.. It will not work again this time to boil everyone in one boiler.
  14. +2
    21 January 2022 12: 48
    How much does Ukraine need? All bridges along the Dnieper and a couple of main distribution stations. When the electricity in the country runs out, people with pitchforks will come to Zelibobo with questions. No patriots and punishers will save
    So attacking the Donbass can be very expensive for Ukraine itself
  15. +1
    21 January 2022 13: 12
    The main advantage is in morality, the Russian Federation always fights for their country and people, but what is the motivation of the All-Union? Die for an illegitimate fascist junta? For some reason, it seems that the majority there will either join the Russian Federation or dump it. Fighting with a regular army is not a civilian shelling, and there is nothing to fight for.
  16. +2
    21 January 2022 13: 37
    Why drag obvious nonsense to the VO and thereby reduce the level of participants in the process to "below the plinth?" The people gathered here are mostly serious and they don’t need to fall to the point of discussing obviously idiotic American talkers.
  17. -3
    21 January 2022 15: 27
    I would argue...
    I would not compare the number of "rockets and guns". But the mood of the armies on both sides to fight. Something tells me that not everything is going smoothly ....
  18. +1
    21 January 2022 17: 21
    And you might think aviation is not an advantage?)))
  19. 0
    21 January 2022 20: 05
    Are the Iskanders used in Syria strong, reusable?
  20. lot
    -2
    21 January 2022 20: 10
    Vyacheslav Volodin hi : "Russia's advantage is Vladimir Putin."
    The American edition should know this.
  21. 0
    21 January 2022 20: 12
    and the Yusov media experts don’t know that these complexes or nuclear missiles can be located in any region of the Russian Federation, but the fact that any other country can border next to any region is not for you. and if Ukraine bordered on a region where there is yao, it turns out we are preparing vigorously with a club to strengthen the sigh?
  22. -1
    23 January 2022 01: 13
    I understand. Your Jewish oligarchs are more well armed than our Jewish oligarchs. And this means that the former can take away the right to rob us from the latter. But the latter will fight to the last, so that this fairy tale does not end.
    But the important question remains - what do we care about this? The rest of the 97% of the population...
  23. 0
    23 January 2022 09: 50
    Quote: 210ox
    Location of events? Kiev, Vinnitsa, Dnepropetrovsk?


    Is Odessa right for you? Your conclusions, at least strange, not being on the territory of Ukraine, you claim that "there are no pro-Russian forces there." So I will please you (or disappoint) - they are there. With whom, in your opinion, are various inadequate "aktyvysts" and "sprechenfuehrers" fiercely fighting? Who are discriminatory laws against? Think. If someone was "bitten by Bandera", as you put it, then this can only happen to ideologically weak individuals, who are hesitant, or simply narrow-minded people. Khutorskoye ochn firmly sits in the population of Ukraine.
  24. KCA
    0
    25 January 2022 13: 45
    Aha, when the Iskanders were transferred to Kaliningrad, NATO found out about it only from stories on Russian TV, and then they saw it right under the tarpaulin, well, unless our Defense Ministry set out to deliberately expose them