Stoltenberg: It is important to agree with Russia that there will be no attack on Ukraine

104

NATO Secretary General at a joint press conference with the German Chancellor said that the negotiation process with Russia must be continued. According to Jens Stoltenberg, "there is a mutual interest in continuing the dialogue, searching for common ground."

Stoltenberg:



On behalf of NATO, I invite Russia to hold a new meeting in the format of our council, which has already resumed work on January 12 in Brussels. Now the main thing is to reach a steady progress in relations. The countries that are members of the alliance express their interest in meeting with the Russian delegation.

The Secretary General of the Western military bloc said that he also sent an invitation to all the governments of the member countries of the alliance, so that delegations would be formed there for a possible future meeting with the Russian side. No word yet on where such a meeting could take place.

According to Stoltenberg, it is important to agree with Russia that there will be no attack on Ukraine.

Stoltenberg:

During the talks on January 12, we have already brought to the attention of Russia that the invasion of Ukraine is unacceptable. We told the Russian side that the offensive would cost Russia dearly. We are ready to respond jointly if this happens. And we made it clear that we don't want that to happen.

At the same time, the NATO Secretary General once again announced the alliance's "open door" policy, adding that there are no clauses in the charter prohibiting the entry of the alliance to specific countries. However, Stoltenberg again did not name a specific date for granting Ukraine the MAP - an action plan for NATO membership.

At the same press conference, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz stated the importance of dialogue with Russia, noting that "for the whole of Europe, it will be an extremely positive moment for Russia to withdraw its troops from the borders of Ukraine."

Recall that earlier Russia was called upon to withdraw the Iskander-M OTRK from the Kaliningrad region. Moscow refused, recalling that the Kaliningrad region is the territory of Russia, and on its territory Russia can place weapons where it sees fit.
104 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    18 January 2022 18: 07
    Very soon you will forget about Ukraine, Jens, believe me. When Caracas and Havana join the CSTO, you will forget about it forever
    1. -18
      18 January 2022 18: 22
      Quote: impostor
      When Caracas and Havana join the CSTO,

      Tell me, when do you think this happy event will happen?
      1. -2
        19 January 2022 04: 27
        Yes, he blurted out like he waved his saber!
        1. 0
          19 January 2022 14: 51
          Quote: 76rtbr
          Yes, he blurted out like he waved his saber!

          And unexpectedly hit the target! ..
          1. 0
            19 January 2022 22: 00
            NATO members are talking, playing for time and preparing to seize Ukraine! negative
      2. -2
        19 January 2022 17: 13
        When will the Greeks begin to mark the time by calends...
    2. -25
      18 January 2022 18: 31
      By adding aspiring allies to the CSTO, we can be drawn into the war. Even NATO does not accept just anyone, so as not to mess up later.
      1. 0
        19 January 2022 14: 52
        Quote: Secutor
        Even NATO does not accept just anyone, so as not to mess up later.

        Already got in, with a hyena and sprats ...
    3. +3
      18 January 2022 19: 04
      The line of populists has arrived.
    4. +4
      19 January 2022 10: 15
      Stoltenberg: It is important to agree with Russia that there will be no attack on Ukraine
      So that Svidomo could calmly start killing the population of the LDNR? Can't wait
      1. +1
        19 January 2022 14: 55
        Quote: Wend
        So that Svidomo could calmly start killing the population of the LDNR? Can't wait

        The Cheka with volunteers and freedom of action will help the LDNR make mincemeat from the Armed Forces of Ukraine ...
    5. +1
      19 January 2022 10: 54
      I think we can quickly forget if we pull the rubber. Stoltenberg is just talking and playing for time. Just like other fellow negotiating partners. Now Poroshenko was brought there to rock the situation. Riots will start. NATO will be urgently invited there to conduct an anti-terrorist operation - most likely officially and promptly. Just like in the situation with Kazakhstan, the CSTO - That's when Russia will be re-facted. So it's time to quickly start moving to the Dnieper.
      1. -1
        19 January 2022 15: 00
        Quote: zloybond
        Riots will begin. NATO will be urgently invited there to conduct an anti-terrorist operation - and most likely officially and promptly.

        In this case, the recognition of the LDNR and the official supply of weapons will help to freeze many zealous fighters from NATO. When Fritsev and Zhanov begin to be delivered to their homes in plastic bags, then many governments in Europe will change ...
    6. -3
      19 January 2022 16: 47
      Oh, then not soon ....
  2. +6
    18 January 2022 18: 08
    Well, if you start deploying missiles and bases ... I think Russia will decide on this! This is the security of the state, do you understand everything cunning? Or was the Caribbean crisis not a lesson for you?
    Iran is inviting us and asking for modern weapons .. Our ships, together with China, are already there, ready to conduct joint exercises with missile launches, etc. There is your Israel nearby, how do you like that?
    PS This is just the beginning!
  3. +11
    18 January 2022 18: 13
    And there won’t be any kind of attack on Ukraine anyway, unless they beg for it themselves, but they will definitely put horseradish to the nose of the Americans.
    Those who do not believe will soon be convinced of this, it will not be long to wait.
    Now, within a week, ours will receive an official response and begin to act if the mattresses do not draw the correct conclusions from the warning to Russia.
    am
    1. -12
      18 January 2022 18: 33
      unless they ask for it themselves

      Who will provoke the TOP-3 country in terms of the strength of the army when it pulled troops to your borders?
      1. NKT
        +15
        18 January 2022 19: 43
        Country TOP-1 and TOP404
      2. 0
        19 January 2022 06: 22
        Quote: Secutor
        Who will provoke

        The one who is designed for this.
        They have such a fate, they chose it themselves, and were very pleased.
    2. +11
      18 January 2022 18: 36
      All right, as Major McNabbs (Children of Captain Grant) used to say - the gentlemen have been warned. Gentlemen shouldn't be offended. soldier
    3. +11
      18 January 2022 18: 44
      Quote: Retvizan 8
      And there will be no attack on Ukraine anyway, unless they themselves beg

      It is important to agree with Russia that there will be no attack on Ukraine

      Do they need a receipt from us? Or is "honest pioneer" enough?
      1. +3
        19 January 2022 16: 22
        They will ask to give them hostages - the children of the oligarchs. Oh yes, I forgot. Children of oligarchs and deputies are already there.
        1. 0
          19 January 2022 20: 21
          Quote: Pereira
          Oh yes, I forgot. Children of oligarchs and deputies are already there.

          Fucking oligarchs who have children there. With money, it’s not bad to live here and you can eat sweetly. And without money, there is nothing to do there.
          1. +1
            19 January 2022 21: 45
            They provided for themselves, children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren. Why do they need Russia?
            1. -1
              20 January 2022 08: 29
              Quote: Pereira
              They provided for themselves, children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren. Why do they need Russia?

              Well, they, of course, do not need to. Moreover, if honestly stolen can be easily taken away (they think that it is safer in British banks ... Ha! Naive ...)

              Of course, I don’t have enough for great-grandchildren, great-great-grandchildren, but the children do not live in poverty. For every ruble I can report tax. Even, unlike Rockefeller, for the first million rubles.
              I could, if desired, pull a carefree life for money somewhere, if not in Miami Beach, then in Texas for sure. WHAT FOR? What am I missing here, and there for it to be heaps? I was there, looked - there is nothing there that I cannot afford here. And what should I do there? Is it just to admire the blacks - it gets boring quickly ...
    4. 0
      19 January 2022 03: 30
      They won't draw the right conclusions. They are not stupid, but stubborn.
    5. 0
      20 January 2022 01: 20
      Some movement by sea has already begun.
  4. +8
    18 January 2022 18: 21
    Gopnik Stoltenberg and the Yankees will soon forget about the outskirts and about something else. The Yankees are even more afraid of opening a base in Cam Ranh than in Venezuela and Cuba. And they are also afraid of a rapprochement between Russia and Iran. So inadvertently Iran will be in the CSTO
    1. +8
      18 January 2022 20: 40
      It's been a long time since Negroes overseas rebelled .... Yes, and the Irish have quieted down ... It's time for Petrov and Bashirov to go to work ...
    2. 0
      19 January 2022 06: 24
      Quote: rusich
      opening of a base in Cam Ranh,

      So the Vietnamese seemed to clearly say no more foreign bases. Have played enough.
    3. +1
      19 January 2022 11: 36
      Quote: rusich
      opening of a base in Cam Ranh

      A good base, and a good place near the base, but what are you going to place on it? If there are not enough ships to protect Primorye ... Not to mention the islands ... Kamchatka ...
      Such ambitions must be confirmed by the economy and the Navy. And our economy is not pulling out the Fleet - in the construction of ships.
      But for a good base in Cuba, the Fleet is not so critical if the DBK with "Zircons", "Caliber" and "Daggers" on the MiG-31K deploy there.
      And in the "Handy" mode.
      1. +2
        19 January 2022 13: 58
        The situation in the Far East is dire. There is no navy, no marines, no ground forces, very little aviation.
        And just look at the coast from Chukotka to Nakhodka? How to protect all this? Not to mention the Kuril ridge.
        And if the most powerful air force / navy of South Korea and Japan will surely come out on the side of the United States.
        1. 0
          19 January 2022 14: 32
          And then Korea, even South, in this meat grinder, what to do?
          Okay Japan - she has phantom pains.
          In the Far East, things need to be corrected by aviation. By the way, the first regimental set of the Su-57 will remain there. And "Daggers" on the MiG-31K are also there.
          1. -4
            19 January 2022 17: 19
            But Cuba cares...
          2. 0
            19 January 2022 18: 08
            And South Korea has a special relationship with the Pentagon. And the American contingent there is under 100 thousand people.
            At least they will defend their territory together with the Americans and their bases.
            And the Marine Corps is needed in the Pacific Fleet. Not pathetic 3-4 thousand, but at least 25-40 thousand.
  5. +14
    18 January 2022 18: 23
    Along the way, the entire West has already firmly decided that the Russian Federation should attack Ukraine.
    There is no motive, there is no meaning, it doesn't matter, attack, period. Attack yourself, against Portugal. From the fact that it will be bombed NATO will not weaken much.
    1. +5
      18 January 2022 18: 38
      Mario is going to rob a bank? wink(m/movie "robbery by ...)
  6. +12
    18 January 2022 18: 23
    The Secretary General of the Western military bloc said that he also sent an invitation to all the governments of the member countries of the alliance, so that delegations would be formed there for a possible future meeting with the Russian side.


    What to talk to you about, we will negotiate with your boss ...
  7. +3
    18 January 2022 18: 25
    We told the Russian side that the offensive would cost Russia dearly.

    Well, with a whip it’s understandable, almost ... And what kind of gingerbread will you beckon, Yancy? What can you offer tasty for Russia to put aside for a while its aggressive plans of conquest regarding the owner of the most powerful European army? wassat
  8. 0
    18 January 2022 18: 31
    In the event of a military decision, on the part of Ukraine, of the LDNR issue, nothing will remain of the ukrovermoht. And NATO will be harnessed, these are their problems. RF from Vladivostok to Lisbon and a radioactive desert instead of the USA. For deceit in Russia they beat the face, hard and accurately. The people whom the West promised not to move NATO east are still alive. hi
    1. -3
      19 January 2022 06: 26
      Quote: fif21
      RF from Vladivostok to Lisbon and a radioactive desert instead of the USA.

      Oh...
      Raise your shoulder, swing your arm....
      And what, you don’t really like the option with a radioactive desert from Vladivostok to Lisbon, it seems.
      1. -3
        19 January 2022 12: 08
        Quote: Jacket in stock
        Quote: fif21
        RF from Vladivostok to Lisbon and a radioactive desert instead of the USA.


        And what, you don’t really like the option with a radioactive desert from Vladivostok to Lisbon, it seems.

        I know perfectly well what war is, and refrigerators in Rostov. They ask a Russian - do you want to drink vodka? -I do not want ! Will you? - I will! So here, if you want to fight - I don’t want to! Will you? - I will ! If you like to be patient in life, be it! wassat
  9. +6
    18 January 2022 18: 42
    "..... We, Russia, made it clear to the NATO countries that we do not like their policy of moving towards our borders. We clearly explained to them that we would not allow Ukraine and Georgia to join NATO. We proposed signing security guarantee agreements. ... We are ready for their development and signing."
    How is this worse in meaning and fullness, how does it threaten the inhabitants of countries that are members of NATO?!
  10. CYM
    +3
    18 January 2022 18: 53
    it will be an extremely positive moment for Russia to withdraw its troops from the borders of Ukraine

    But nothing at all, that the border of Ukraine is also the border of Russia, you can also remove the border guards. Enough of the "positive" of the 90s with the withdrawal of the Western Group of Forces and the firing of missiles. Although perhaps they mean the withdrawal of Russian troops from the borders deep into Ukraine. winked
  11. +4
    18 January 2022 20: 38
    Quote: Orel
    Quote: Operator_L
    Budapest memorandum


    This document just guaranteed Ukraine's security and territorial integrity in exchange for the renunciation of nuclear weapons.

    They wrote to you that the memorandum is a non-binding document, in addition, it was not ratified, that is, it did not enter into force, forget about it. Russia was also promised a lot of things, but did not deliver.
  12. 0
    18 January 2022 21: 20
    Quote: Operator_L
    So what kind of "immediate security guarantees from NATO" are we talking about in the negotiations? Forget about warranties! From Russia, they do not require guarantees about the non-expansion of the CSTO! Who wants to join the CSTO - join, it's your business. Who thinks that the best choice is NATO, join NATO! So what then does the sun-faced require?
    Or does Russia simply want to protect Ukraine from NATO? Is Russia being asked or demanded about this?

    They are set out in the requirements of Russia, something is not clear to you there, do you need to explain?
    About the protection of Ukraine from NATO, this is a thesis invented by you that no one has ever put forward, I don’t know why you invented it, like sarcasm. But Russia would like to protect itself from NATO, and many officials of the Russian Federation openly declared this.
  13. 0
    18 January 2022 21: 37
    At the same press conference, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz stated the importance of dialogue with Russia, noting that "for the whole of Europe, it will be an extremely positive moment for Russia to withdraw its troops from the borders of Ukraine."
    And for Russia it will be an extremely positive moment - withdrawal of NATO troops from the Russian border, this is what Stoltenberg and his pack must understand before making an ultimatum to Russia. Well, Russia does not need Ukraine, even if NATO pays Russia for it.
  14. 0
    18 January 2022 21: 51
    hesitated about Ukraine, they want to focus attention on Ukraine, and the matter is in NATO, which has approached the borders of the Russian Federation !!!!!!!!!!!!!
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. 0
    18 January 2022 21: 58
    Quote: ALSur
    Quote: Operator_L
    Russia has no right to claim outside of Russia. If Russia wants its opinion to be considered outside of Russia, international agreements and international laws must be observed.
    Russia has created this crisis, has annexed the territories of neighboring countries, is waging wars on the territories of neighboring countries, Russia is concentrating its armed forces on the borders of neighboring countries. At the moment, Russia is an aggressor country, a country that supports terrorism, a pariah country!.
    Russia must clearly and clearly understand where the borders of Russia are.


    And the US does not do the same, only in large quantities, or is it different?

    And the picture is correct, it is there that the borders of Russia end, where the adversary can be heaped on.
  18. +6
    18 January 2022 22: 02
    Quote: Tomatoes
    I'm in shock, gentlemen, I received warnings for much more measured turnovers. How communication style has changed.
    If on the topic, then all these events speak of a monstrous failure in the foreign policy of the respected Vladimir Vladimirovich.
    As we remember, it all started with the intention to invite Ukraine to the CU. Those. get influence on the politics of Ukraine, the economy, get a reliable ally.
    The result is absolutely the opposite - the worst enemy, everything as Brzezinski dreamed. Well, more sanctions, a drop in living standards, a confrontation with NATO, well, and on trifles.
    If it's a success, why not repeat it? Chop off a piece from Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Mongolia.
    Alas, no one has yet been able to clearly explain what is the benefit of Russia's national interests.

    Did Putin do everything in Ukraine that she did not go to the TC? You have it in Ukraine, he is to blame for everything, even the state. coup.
    And how better it became in Ukraine from not joining the CU, you know better.
  19. CYM
    +1
    18 January 2022 22: 13
    Quote: Operator_L
    With gopniks who do not recognize international agreements and international law, no one will have any business.
    Are you talking about the "defensive" NATO bloc, which, without a UN mandate, carried out "humanitarian" bombing of Yugoslavia, killing 1700 civilians? Or about the "empire of goodness" of the United States, which only at the end of the 20th century used armed forces abroad more than 200 times, while formally declaring war only 11 times? Or about the "peace-loving" Japanese who brutally murdered 24 million civilians in China? winked
    1. -8
      18 January 2022 22: 27
      “Peaceful good Yugoslavia” fell apart at that time, but left a bunch of war crimes behind.
  20. lot
    -9
    18 January 2022 22: 46
    Eh, it looks like the red lines are crawling in the wrong place:
    As of 18:49, Yandex shares have fallen in price by 5,56% since the start of trading, Sberbank - by 10,39%, Gazprom - by 8,65%.

    Russian stocks are depreciating amid geopolitical tensions: Russia's failed talks with the US and NATO and the threat of Western sanctions.
  21. +2
    18 January 2022 22: 50
    Quote: lot
    Eh, it looks like the red lines are crawling in the wrong place:
    As of 18:49, Yandex shares have fallen in price by 5,56% since the start of trading, Sberbank - by 10,39%, Gazprom - by 8,65%.

    Russian stocks are depreciating amid geopolitical tensions: Russia's failed talks with the US and NATO and the threat of Western sanctions.

    As usual, is this big news for you?
    And how much will the price of gas rise for you?
    1. lot
      -8
      18 January 2022 22: 56
      No, total bullshit laughing laughing
      some 10 percent. trivia.
  22. 0
    18 January 2022 22: 58
    Quote: lot
    No, total bullshit laughing laughing
    some 10 percent. trivia.

    Today it fell, tomorrow it will rise, the markets work like that, what's the problem?
  23. 0
    19 January 2022 00: 08
    Europe is our Russian "backyard". Remove NATO altogether from Europe to hell!
    -------
    The Russians are harnessing for a long time, it's time to go (c) Lavrov.
  24. 0
    19 January 2022 03: 50
    With whom and what to negotiate. Wet them with NATA. These bastards also gave birth to Adolf with a small Bonaparte, and before that they were crusading. They only beat and beat, they will understand nothing more. LGBT.
  25. -1
    19 January 2022 04: 48
    Russia is tired of "attacking" the unfortunate ukrov - last year 5 times, already this January 3, according to regional committee forecasts, at the end of January !!! you already somehow decide when we should "attack". The boomerang is an interesting thing, you launched it, it didn't hit Russia, it flies to you, so what do you think.
  26. +1
    19 January 2022 06: 11
    At the same press conference, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz stated the importance of dialogue with Russia, noting that "for the whole of Europe, it will be an extremely positive moment for Russia to withdraw its troops from the borders of Ukraine."

    I didn’t hear something that Scholz suggested about the same to Ukraine - to withdraw troops and heavy weapons from the line of contact with the LDNR (or CADLO, if they so desire). But this is the simplest and most effective proposal to reduce all the risks of conflict. And I think they are well aware of this. But they don’t offer it, because the whole situation and calls from the West are the purest swindle of Russia. The main ringleader there is the United States. Therefore, it makes no sense to meet with Stoltenberg and delegations from NATO member countries, except as an informational occasion - "well, we sat there again, quarreled and came to nothing."
    1. -2
      19 January 2022 17: 31
      I didn’t hear something that Scholz suggested about the same to Ukraine - to withdraw troops and heavy weapons from the line of contact with the LDNR (or CADLO, if they so please

      You probably have not heard that "Donbass is Ukraine" (V.V. Putin).
      And "LDNR" exists in your imagination.
      In the text of Minsk-2, which the pitriots are so resting on, there are no letters ldnr.
      Put on a cross already, or something ...
      1. 0
        19 January 2022 19: 16
        Quote: Barge_watchman
        You probably have not heard that "Donbass is Ukraine" (V.V. Putin).
        And "LDNR" exists in your imagination.

        You, obviously, have been on your barge for so long that you have forgotten how to understand the meaning of the whole phrase. You were only enough for four letters. And the meaning of what I said is that, in general, it is violet to me how these unfortunate people christened their state, even if not yet recognized, education. The point is that Western politicians do not need peace there in principle, because it can be achieved in two days, but by other methods. And this means that their efforts and pressure on Russia are pursuing completely different goals. And I don't care what's in Minsk-2, 3 and beyond ... will be written. It is clear that the war there is beneficial to Westerners, and it will continue with any inscriptions anywhere. Have I made it clear to you my vision of the situation? And here's another thing ... what I should wear or take off, I will decide for myself, and certainly without any guards. Sorry if something offended you. soldier
  27. 0
    19 January 2022 10: 01
    He does not understand what he is saying to the whole world.
    Is the whole world stupid people?
  28. +1
    19 January 2022 10: 53
    Stoltenberg: It is important to agree with Russia that there will be no attack on Ukraine

    So Russia has already proposed - Ukraine, Georgia outside NATO and no foreign bases on their territory. Do it, then there is something to talk about.
    1. -2
      19 January 2022 17: 33
      Sure, not a problem.
      zero option - everyone returns to the 1997 line.
      Is it coming?
  29. 0
    20 January 2022 23: 12
    "We are ready to respond jointly if this happens." - and therefore the small-shaven ones announced that in the event of a "Russian attack on Ukraine" they would be evacuated (that is, they would run away)