Military Review

Military Watch: China extended the construction of a series of Type 055 destroyers

106

The Chinese Navy is building up its forces, gradually reaching the forefront in the world. According to Military Watch, Beijing has extended the construction of a series of Type 055 destroyers.


To date, the PLA Navy has two newest Type 055 destroyers. The lead destroyer of the Nanchang project was first shown on April 23, 2019 at the naval parade in honor of the 70th anniversary of the PLA Navy, and was officially transferred to the Chinese fleet January 12, 2020. The second in the series and the first serial destroyer Lhasa was commissioned into the Navy in March 2021. Both ships are assigned to the naval base in Qingdao, thereby becoming part of the Northern Fleet of the PLA Navy.

According to the newspaper, the Type 055 destroyers are considered the most combat-ready in the Chinese fleet and the largest destroyers in the world, second only to American Zumwalt-class ships, surpassing the Arleigh Burke destroyers and Ticonderoga cruisers. In the US, Type 055 is generally classified as a cruiser.

They have a total displacement of 13 tons, a hull length of 183 meters, a width of 20 meters, and a draft of 6,6 meters. The ship is armed with HQ-9B anti-aircraft missiles with a range of up to 200 km, promising HQ-26 missiles (similar to the American SM-3), YJ-18A anti-ship missiles (similar to Caliber). In total, the ship has 112 universal launchers. It is assumed that the destroyers are also armed with YU-8A anti-submarine missiles. In addition, the ship is equipped with a fully automatic 130-mm H / PJ-38 gun mount, four 30-mm H / PJ-11 anti-aircraft gun systems, short-range HQ-10 anti-aircraft missile systems and torpedoes.

Initially, it was assumed that China intends to build 8 type 055 destroyers, last year it was reported that in addition to the lead and first production ships, six more ships of this project were under construction. However, today there is information about the construction of two more destroyers. Thus, the series will be brought up to 10 ships. At the same time, it is not excluded that the series will be completed according to the improved Type 055A project.

It is assumed that the new destroyers will be included in the escort group of the latest Chinese aircraft carriers, finally turning China into a leading naval power.
106 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Sandor Clegane
    Sandor Clegane 16 January 2022 12: 06
    +11
    I don’t even envy China anymore, but I understand that there .... in the Middle Kingdom .... they know how to work and take care of the people ....
    1. Roma 1977
      Roma 1977 16 January 2022 12: 35
      +14
      The Chinese themselves do not have a very high opinion of their government's concern for the people. But they look to the future with optimism and are proud of their country.
    2. Barberry25
      Barberry25 16 January 2022 12: 40
      +7
      the Chinese have always been able to work, but about "taking care of the people" is a very controversial point, the main thing here is that they were able to gain competence and build ships, and our Ministry of Defense will hang himself ready for an extra ruble, not to mention the fact that they still haven’t formed a coherent strategy for the development of the fleet.
      1. for
        for 16 January 2022 13: 22
        -5
        Quote: Barberry25
        The Chinese have always been able to work,

        You want to eat and you will work.
        1. Ingvar 72
          Ingvar 72 16 January 2022 14: 54
          +8
          Quote: for
          You want to eat and you will work.

          Not only, namesake. hi Chinese salaries have long been higher than ours in terms of purchasing power. They surpassed us in caring for the people. And today China is far from being a copyist factory, it is enough to compare their car industry today with the car industry 10 years ago.
          An example of development is before our eyes, but "our" helmsmen stubbornly rely on "Flows" of different directions.
          1. for
            for 16 January 2022 17: 44
            +9
            Quote: Ingvar 72
            Chinese salaries have long been higher than ours in terms of purchasing power.

            I don't know I haven't been there.
            But it was a shame by chance about 2-3 years ago I listened to an interview with a restaurateur from China (a restaurant in Primorye) to the question: "Who works for you, probably they brought people with them?"
            Answer: "Why, the locals are cheaper."
      2. Galleon
        Galleon 16 January 2022 14: 41
        +8
        Quote: Barberry25
        have not yet formed a coherent strategy for the development of the fleet

        The strategy for the development of the fleet is formed by the political leadership of the country. This strategy has not been formed in our country for the same reason that the fleet is not developing harmoniously, all naval aviation is not developing, and for the same reason, the country's economy has lost 3 trillion dollars over 30 years of reparations to the American "winner" in the cold war.
        Over the centuries of confrontation, Western civilization has become well accustomed to understanding that the enemy's fleet is destroyed first, then its history. And that's all - his strength is undermined. We still have a lot to add. Breakthroughs and jerks are a dime a dozen.
        1. Barberry25
          Barberry25 16 January 2022 16: 30
          -6
          the strategy is formed by the General Staff, since they are specialists in the field of defense, or do you think that let's say the AP decides which ships we need for the fleet? The fact remains that the Ministry of Defense does not want to move on this issue .. As with modular ships, as with corvettes and frigates ... And this is a frequent case, an example of a BMPT - when at first the Ministry of Defense requested a specialized fire support vehicle for tanks, and when it was built it refused to buy it under the pretext - we don’t know where to deliver it to the organizational staff and what to do with it .. By in fact, if not a direct order from the president whom they contacted, I think there would not even be tests from UVZ supplies
          1. Galleon
            Galleon 16 January 2022 19: 42
            -1
            Your mistake gives you an amateur in the issues under discussion. You are confused about the levels of decisions made by management. Determining the strategic tasks of the Navy and the technical requirements for a amphibious tank are things of the same order for you. Actually it is not. Listen more, study and do not rush to get into an argument. Believe me, the truth has never been born in disputes. These are only the fantasies of the ancient Greeks, but the Greeks are generally lovers of conversation, they also have a hymn of 158 verses.
            1. Barberry25
              Barberry25 16 January 2022 20: 16
              -3
              wow, well, tell us how things really are with us and who is responsible for the formation of the technical specifications for the development and serial order of the NK, at least, you see "know" .. or will there be excuses now?
            2. DMi
              DMi 16 January 2022 23: 25
              -1
              The ancient Greeks did not have hymns. Even for one couplet. Your reflections betray you as an amateur in history and philosophy)
              1. Galleon
                Galleon 17 January 2022 11: 04
                -3
                Quote: DMi
                The ancient Greeks did not have hymns. Even for one couplet. Your reflections betray you as an amateur in history and philosophy)

                Sobeyannichat, ucra? Not aware that in ancient times there was no country called Greece? There were policies like Athens, there were Sparta, Macedonia, etc. Open the Iliad - there is a complete list there)). But now in a country called Greece there is an anthem. Greeks are the most verbose nation. For example, a Greek metropolitan needs 15-20 minutes to say hello. wink
                1. DMi
                  DMi 17 January 2022 17: 06
                  -1
                  And where did I write that in ancient times there was a country called Greece? Learn to read first. And understand the meaning of what is written. The current country of Greece has nothing to do with the culture of the policies, which is collectively called "ancient Greece". Not culturally, not even genetically. So to make a comparison between modern strange Greece and the philosophical heritage of the ancient Greeks is to sign your own ignorance.
        2. DMi
          DMi 16 January 2022 23: 23
          -1
          Any military strategy is formed by the MOD. Politicians only approve or not. Do not turn upside down.
          1. Galleon
            Galleon 17 January 2022 11: 07
            -1
            Quote: DMi
            Any military strategy is formed by the MOD.

            Let your MO form. Let.
          2. Denis812
            Denis812 17 January 2022 12: 07
            0
            You are not quite right.
            It is the politicians who define the goals and objectives. That is a strategy.
            But the low-level definition of how these goals should be achieved is up to specialists in the MO.
            Roughly speaking, for example, from the situation in Abkhazia and South Ossetia: The President says: we must protect the peacekeepers and push the Georgians away from Abkhazia and South Ossetia.
            And already HOW this will be done, by what forces, means - yes, the business of the Moscow Region.
            Neither Putin nor Medvedev drew arrows on the maps and do not draw.
            Although yes, there was such a character in history - Hitler was called, but his passion for micromanagement played a cruel joke on Germany in the end, as you know.
            1. German A
              German A 18 January 2022 08: 19
              0
              As comrade Manstein writes, he is Lewinski from birth (probably a distant relative of Monica) and how I understood this for myself. Hitler took over the management of the General Staff not to draw arrows, but to eliminate people who did not want to follow his orders.
        3. German A
          German A 18 January 2022 08: 10
          0
          Are there official sources and figures for payments? It would be interesting to know the conditions of the game / war? Did Pauls land on the square? How was the surrender signed? The fact that Moscow has surrendered everything is a fact.
          Yes, there was a delegation to NATO, everyone smiled and shook hands with each other. For me, they were not discussing Ukraine there, but China. I hope that the Russians will not again be driven to fight with the Chinese, as Comrade Solzhenitsyn advised. Let the West deal with them or capitulate if they don't want to fight...
      3. Lara Croft
        Lara Croft 16 January 2022 15: 06
        +1
        Quote: Barberry25
        have not yet formed a coherent strategy for the development of the fleet.

        5 years ago, when they formed ....
        Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of July 20, 2017 No. 327 "On approval of the Fundamentals of State Policy of the Russian Federation in the field of naval activities for the period up to 2030"
        https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71625734/
        It seems that everything is fine for the sane ....
        and our MO will hang himself ready for an extra ruble

        they’re doing it right, they provide the performance characteristics of our military-industrial complex for a new aircraft carrier, and they provide him with the Ulyanovsk project from the archive and say that this is a new trend in shipbuilding ....
        1. Ingvar 72
          Ingvar 72 16 January 2022 16: 07
          +1
          Quote: Lara Croft
          5 years ago, when they formed ....

          And?
          Quote: Lara Croft
          they provide the performance characteristics of our military-industrial complex for a new aircraft carrier, and they provide him with the Ulyanovsk project from the archive and say that this is a new trend in shipbuilding ....

          Suggest what would China do with such smart people?
          1. bayard
            bayard 16 January 2022 19: 34
            +1
            Quote: Ingvar 72
            Quote: Lara Croft
            5 years ago, when they formed ....

            And?

            Formulate a strategy and bring it to life ... With such leadership from USC, this music will be eternal.
        2. Besmaster
          Besmaster 17 January 2022 03: 57
          -1
          Quote: Lara Croft

          they’re doing it right, they provide the performance characteristics of our military-industrial complex for a new aircraft carrier, and they provide him with the Ulyanovsk project from the archive and say that this is a new trend in shipbuilding ....

          Because you must first learn how to build "Ulyanovsk". You can't jump over. The Chinese are not stupid.
          1) We bought a Varangian from Ukraine, made Liaoning type-001 out of it (Analogue of our Kuznetsov)
          2) Then, when type-001 was filled in Liaoning, they made their own type-002 (Analogue of Ulyanovsk)
          3) And then type-003 was laid down - an analogue of Nimitz. They didn't immediately start building Nimitz. Because that's not how it's done. They developed to Nimitz without missing important milestones.
    3. volodimer
      volodimer 16 January 2022 13: 01
      +7
      I didn’t understand where the article about the armament of the 3rd destroyer Zamvolt disappeared. There was a comment that "they are at least building." Replied:
      Vyacheslav, what
      At least they build them.
      I don't get jealous. It's like being jealous of the fact that Saudi princes are building hotels for camels. If they can afford to throw money down the drain, so be it. So we are only 3 more ships behind them. Now, if they built Arley with this money, then the gap would be much steeper.
      Here is how, what and how much China is building .. there is where I can’t sleep with envy.

      When corrected, I managed to select and copy. I repeat.
      After all, it is no less relevant here.
      If there may be questions on the question of what China is building, then as и с what stunning speed. It's just jealousy. And their spending efficiency is much higher than that of Zamvoltov. And while overseas will swell billions into dubious "advanced technologies", China will catch up and surpass them in quantitative terms. And this will already be enough.
  2. demiurg
    demiurg 16 January 2022 12: 07
    +4
    Something Vika writes that up to 16 pieces are planned.
    Or is the increase in the series a reserve for another piece of news?
    1. Murmur 55
      Murmur 55 16 January 2022 12: 21
      +3
      hi believe this "Vika", sometimes they will write such a thing there, not a very truthful resource.
    2. Flooding
      Flooding 16 January 2022 12: 32
      -1
      Quote: demiurg
      Something Vika writes that up to 16 pieces are planned

      you to the source
      https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/055%E5%9E%8B%E5%AF%BC%E5%BC%B9%E9%A9%B1%E9%80%90%E8%88%B0
  3. Sandor Clegane
    Sandor Clegane 16 January 2022 12: 07
    +1
    I don’t even envy China anymore, but I understand the principle of the attitude of the authorities to the defense of the country and its population!
    1. antivirus
      antivirus 16 January 2022 12: 36
      +1
      the new destroyers will be part of the escort group for the latest Chinese aircraft carriers, finally turning China into a leading naval power.

      -INTERESTING WHERE THE AUG WILL GO -TO THE EAST: YAPI AND HAWAII OR THE INDIAN OCEAN?

      or beyond the colonies, to the south. conquer Australia?
      1. Sandor Clegane
        Sandor Clegane 16 January 2022 15: 40
        +1
        Quote: antivirus

        or beyond the colonies, to the south. conquer Australia?

        very common and very stupid question
        1. antivirus
          antivirus 16 January 2022 16: 05
          -3
          And others are smart, do they ask smart questions? and where will the Chinese Navy go besides those seas?
          the correct answer is Kamchatka and the NSR
          1. Sandor Clegane
            Sandor Clegane 16 January 2022 16: 23
            +1
            Quote: antivirus
            And others are smart, do they ask smart questions?

            answer for yourself and your post
            Quote: antivirus
            and where will the Chinese Navy go besides those seas?
            I don’t answer stupid and even almost stupid questions, but I point them out!
            the correct answer is Kamchatka and the NSR
          2. bayard
            bayard 16 January 2022 19: 46
            +4
            Quote: antivirus
            -to Kamchatka and NSR

            On aircraft carriers and destroyers for tropical latitudes?
            Their main resource base (and the sales market is already quite good) is Africa. And all the traffic back and forth through the Indian Ocean and the Straits of Malacca. It is very vulnerable without powerful cover from its own navy. After the US organized a series of coups in Africa, when China lost its assets and investments, the Chinyans decided to build a Big Fleet. And they are building.
            And, by the way, destroyers 055 are going to be built much more than 10 ... 20. We are talking about a series of up to 50 pieces. For the sake of this, the 052D series was also limited.
            And they will not go north until Russia weakens.
      2. Artemion3
        Artemion3 16 January 2022 21: 29
        0
        They will go to protect sea communications from the Persian Gulf to China, along which tankers with oil go.
        1. antivirus
          antivirus 17 January 2022 09: 16
          0
          the logic of the military ----!!! is the opposite of the logic of the bankers - the protection of money BUT NOT TANKERS AND OTHER TRADE ..
          if the party orders, the PLA will answer "yes".
          and bankers can easily turn the loot.
          there are insurance companies and they clearly define the risks. up to the XX limit "we will pay",
          with UU - "only protection by the fleet, we won't spend so much on a tanker, the losses are bad."
          an organic merger of NAVI and bankers is on Wall Street and the City.
          so they will resist Hong Kong and Shanghai, it is not visible from the bridges of a future war - it grows on the tables of bankers, in the dust from pieces of paper (or in the dust of the system of computer blocks - vacuum those boxes more often - will it help ??)
      3. gsev
        gsev 17 January 2022 17: 19
        +1
        Quote: antivirus
        -INTERESTING WHERE THE AUG WILL GO -TO THE EAST: YAPI AND HAWAII OR THE INDIAN OCEAN?

        or beyond the colonies, to the south. conquer Australia?

        The Chinese seem to believe that with three aircraft carriers they can only break through the line of Taiwan and the Japanese islands. For trips to the shores of Australia or the Indian Ocean, a dozen aircraft carriers are needed.
        1. antivirus
          antivirus 17 January 2022 18: 59
          +1
          For trips to the shores of Australia or the Indian Ocean, a dozen aircraft carriers are needed.

          -Down and Out trouble started.
          have they already begun to prepare 10 crew compositions (with duplication) for 10 Av or have they simply not announced aloud?
          but they will go right
          by 30, they suddenly notice - they banned printing a paper newspaper in Chinese in Canberra - it is necessary to protect the rights of national minorities (there will be 4 million CHINESE IN AUSTRALIA then) to protect.
          Will the UN support equality?
  4. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 16 January 2022 12: 12
    +3
    The dragon "builds up its muscles" very quickly... And on the other hand, all trade with Europe can be blocked by the American fleet in the Malacca Strait, even the way around Africa bypassing the Suez Canal does not save. To eliminate all these threats, a strong fleet is needed !!!
    1. Shket53
      Shket53 16 January 2022 12: 19
      +1
      Or maybe the Trans-Siberian Railway, or the SevMorPut, here it will be problematic for the Yankees to block
      1. Krabs
        Krabs 16 January 2022 12: 32
        -1
        oh, right now, I would like to launch container ships on the ice of the Arctic Ocean, but on a polar night laughing
        1. Mountain shooter
          Mountain shooter 16 January 2022 12: 57
          +1
          Quote from Krabs.
          oh, right now, I would like to launch container ships on the ice of the Arctic Ocean, but on a polar night

          Trial not very large have already passed. There are still not enough icebreakers. And why are our "Leader" being built? These are the giants that will carry container ships along the NSR.
      2. Murmur 55
        Murmur 55 16 January 2022 12: 37
        0
        It is easier for Washington to ban the purchase of Chinese goods than to block roads, for example, gas from Russia for E.S.
        1. Denis812
          Denis812 17 January 2022 12: 13
          0
          Washington cannot ban exports from China.
          Because there are no other sources of goods. No one in the world is ready to supply America with goods worth 580 billion dollars a year.
          Yes, and a ban on trade with China will kill $ 180 billion worth of production in America, since this is their export to China.
          America could not even ban SP2, and you are talking about a ban on the purchase of all Chinese goods. :)
      3. Mountain shooter
        Mountain shooter 16 January 2022 12: 55
        +2
        Quote: Shket53
        Or maybe the Trans-Siberian Railway, or the SevMorPut, here it will be problematic for the Yankees to block

        So they opened their mouths on the NSR! Like, it should be international, and the Navy will hang around on it! Their Wishlist is boundless, they correspond only to their greed...
    2. The Siberian barber
      The Siberian barber 16 January 2022 13: 48
      +3
      To understand, "around Africa" ​​they are everywhere!)) Absolutely, completely
      Even in Dakkar, the largest fishing fleet is Chinese))
      And look at the bulk carrier: all hieroglyphs))
      Or some cosco
    3. Sandor Clegane
      Sandor Clegane 16 January 2022 16: 14
      +5
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      the fleet needs a strong one !!!

      the fleet is the only transport that can deliver cargo to any country where there is a port
  5. Murmur 55
    Murmur 55 16 January 2022 12: 14
    +1
    Well, what can I say, well done, the Chinese and communism were saved and raised their homeland, here you have the country "xerox"!
    1. Hiroo Onoda
      Hiroo Onoda 16 January 2022 12: 26
      0
      Quote: Murmur 55
      communism saved

      The world's largest number of dollar billionaires? Good communism.
      1. Murmur 55
        Murmur 55 16 January 2022 12: 32
        +2
        What don't you like??? Do you think that Chinese communism is not correct communism?
        1. Hiroo Onoda
          Hiroo Onoda 16 January 2022 12: 37
          -7
          Quote: Murmur 55
          What don't you like??? Do you think that Chinese communism is not correct communism?

          As far as I remember, one grandfather who died of syphilis did not seem to have bequeathed dollar billionaires to produce recourse
          1. Murmur 55
            Murmur 55 16 January 2022 12: 46
            +1
            Well, how does the presence of billionaires in China prevent the country from developing, getting rich and building muscle??? Or do you think that they stir up their 90s???
            1. Hiroo Onoda
              Hiroo Onoda 16 January 2022 15: 32
              +2
              Quote: Murmur 55
              hinders the development of the country

              No, of course, I didn’t say that, on the contrary, I think that it only helps the country to develop.
              I just initially wanted to say that "communism was saved" - not quite right. It is clearly not the kind of communism that Marx and Engels bequeathed. In a different way to somehow call their system - then yes, I agree. But not communism. What's more, they saved it.
              I don’t know, maybe a social market-digital dictatorship, or something else. But not communism, where are the communes?
          2. Roma 1977
            Roma 1977 16 January 2022 13: 23
            -1
            It just means that a completely different grandfather died of syphilis.
  6. Boa kaa
    Boa kaa 16 January 2022 12: 15
    +5
    Well ... This is a worthy answer by the Yankees to their attempts to arrange a naval blockade of the Celestial Empire in the event of a war.
    And it cannot be otherwise: Beijing receives 90% of its cargo and goods by sea. So, everything is natural.
  7. YOUR
    YOUR 16 January 2022 12: 24
    +4
    Like this. And we rejoice at the commissioning of a frigate or a port tug.
    1. Roma 1977
      Roma 1977 16 January 2022 12: 38
      -2
      And let's give China the honorable right to butt at sea with the Anglo-Saxons. In Russia, purely geographically, it did not work out with the seas-oceans, overseas colonies and maritime transportation, in order to spend money on the fleet for this.
      1. YOUR
        YOUR 16 January 2022 13: 06
        +7
        Yep, exactly. Let's all yield to everyone and let's trade gas and oil.
        1. Roma 1977
          Roma 1977 16 January 2022 13: 18
          -4
          Russia is not fit to be the world's factory. And it does not need raw materials, having it on its territory in abundance. Why, then, the fleet, except for purely defensive purposes: to prevent enemy ships from reaching lines of 2 km from the most important economic objects and to ensure the exit of strategic submarine missile carriers into the world's oceans?
          1. YOUR
            YOUR 16 January 2022 13: 30
            +5
            The fleet is not needed. Aviation is not needed. What else do we need? And what is needed?
            1. Roma 1977
              Roma 1977 16 January 2022 14: 43
              0
              An ocean fleet of a dozen aircraft carrier strike groups is not needed. Four aircraft carriers - maximum. But basic aviation needs more. And cruise missiles for her.
              1. YOUR
                YOUR 16 January 2022 15: 14
                +5
                And what do we have now? Where are the aircraft carriers, not four, at least one. Where are the new planes? Which promise already soon the second decade. And where more than a dozen can be set. But don't get an answer.
                1. Roma 1977
                  Roma 1977 16 January 2022 17: 07
                  -2
                  With aviation, thank God, still all right. And with aircraft carriers, the fleet has not yet decided whether they are needed. And there are reasons for this point of view.
                  1. YOUR
                    YOUR 17 January 2022 05: 50
                    +2
                    How many years are they promising to build the Su-57? They promised to deliver 4 pieces to the troops by the end of last year. ONLY FOUR PIECE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And where are they? Again some obstacles of insurmountable force.
                2. Denis812
                  Denis812 16 January 2022 18: 52
                  0
                  In fact, the fleet did not order a single aircraft carrier.
                  All talk about them is just wishlist.
                  If the need for aircraft carriers were as acute as the need for missiles in the Strategic Missile Forces, new aircraft carriers would have been built long ago.
                  It’s just that comrade admirals cannot prove either to the leadership or to themselves, but WHY Russia has aircraft carriers, especially when there is not enough money for everything.
                  And absolutely right.
                  The loot can also be used on missiles, it’s not so much that there is nowhere to put it.
                  1. YOUR
                    YOUR 17 January 2022 05: 51
                    +1
                    Yes, where does the money go? Here the deputies say hydrocarbons, only they were sold so much that 3 Russia can be rebuilt from scratch. Where is Zin's money?
                    1. Denis812
                      Denis812 17 January 2022 11: 58
                      +1
                      well ... the deputies sold it ... So they had loot :)
          2. Stas
            Stas 16 January 2022 18: 20
            +7
            Now we are going on a bulk carrier to St. Petersburg to be loaded with rolled metal products with delivery to the USA. Prior to that, they drove with fertilizers from Ust-Luga to Brazil. Vessel owner from Germany. Transportation of goods costs very little money. Indeed, why does Russia need its merchant and navy??? Are you serious? Any normal country with its own ports must have a strong fleet and merchant and military.
            1. Roma 1977
              Roma 1977 16 January 2022 19: 27
              -1
              And what is the doctrine for this fleet? The fight against the combined fleet of NATO in the World Ocean? Or is it still the main task of the Russian fleet - delivering a nuclear strike on NATO countries in the event of a NATO attack on Russia? These are very different tasks that require different means.
              1. YOUR
                YOUR 17 January 2022 06: 25
                +1
                Protection of the Motherland on distant frontiers.
                Search and destruction of nuclear submarines before they launch missiles, search and destruction of enemy convoys, search and destruction of aircraft carrier groups in order to prevent attacks on Russian territory.
                Do you have enough of such tasks?
                1. Denis812
                  Denis812 17 January 2022 12: 01
                  +2
                  Colleague Roma correctly suggested to you.
                  The main task of the fleet of the modern Russian Federation is to ensure the strike of the SSBNs.
                  Everything else, unfortunately, is secondary. There is not enough money for everything.
                  But yes, if there is money left, then you need to do what you wrote.
              2. German A
                German A 18 January 2022 08: 33
                +1
                You write everything normally, I gave you a '+' to dilute the '-' from the weak-minded. Russia will not be able to compete in the fleet with anyone, at least in the current state of affairs. This does not mean that corvettes must be built for 9 years and / or fired.
  8. Horus
    Horus 16 January 2022 12: 25
    +1
    The Chinese are great, they stole all the ideas (starting with communism) and everything works for them. Ships bake like pies.
    1. Murmur 55
      Murmur 55 16 January 2022 12: 35
      +11
      Well, they didn’t steal communism, the USSR was happy to distribute the idea to everyone, but about the theft of technology, absolutely EVERYTHING is engaged in industrial and military espionage, with varying degrees of success.
      1. yuriy55
        yuriy55 16 January 2022 13: 23
        +2
        Quote: Murmur 55
        and about the theft of technology like this: EVERYONE, absolutely EVERYONE is engaged in industrial and military espionage with varying degrees of success.

        Add:
        The term of a patent depends on the country of patenting, the object of patenting and ranges from 5 to 35 years

        Sometimes it takes 5 years and 1 day to start releasing (producing something) with the honest eyes of a sick cow. And what is the highlight of military equipment - no need to wait 35 years. Whether it is not enough that it turned out similar. Look, bicycles - in principle, one person. True, they can be felt, looked, compared with the original. Who will let you see military equipment, and even in China ...
    2. Vasyan1971
      Vasyan1971 16 January 2022 13: 03
      -1
      Quote: Horus
      The Chinese are great, they stole all the ideas (starting with communism)

      Chinese communism is a franchise with a national flavor.
  9. TermNachTer
    TermNachTer 16 January 2022 12: 30
    -5
    While mattress covers only draw promising destroyers and cruisers, the Chinese are riveting them at an accelerated pace.
    1. spirit
      spirit 16 January 2022 12: 56
      +6
      While mattress covers only draw promising destroyers

      There is nothing promising in this cruiser, it is just an analogue of the good old Berks.
    2. Yuri V.A
      Yuri V.A 16 January 2022 13: 00
      +2
      What is promising there, if there are only analogues, this is yesterday
      1. Roma 1977
        Roma 1977 16 January 2022 13: 21
        0
        Tomorrow is the installation of hypersonic anti-ship missiles on yesterday's ships. And they will be there.
        1. Yuri V.A
          Yuri V.A 16 January 2022 13: 43
          +1
          And the day after tomorrow is to have the right number of ships of yesterday. The outlook is...
      2. TermNachTer
        TermNachTer 16 January 2022 14: 16
        +2
        When hypersonic anti-ship missiles and cruise missiles appear in its UVP, it will become very promising.
        1. Yuri V.A
          Yuri V.A 16 January 2022 14: 23
          0
          Even more promising than Shaposhnikov?
    3. yuriy55
      yuriy55 16 January 2022 13: 27
      +2
      Quote: TermNachTER
      While mattress covers only draw

      You exaggerated about drawing, but they definitely lag behind in terms of the pace of construction ...
      As for the school of drawing and the academy of arts, there is no need to go far ...
      1. TermNachTer
        TermNachTer 16 January 2022 14: 19
        -3
        What was wrong? Where are the cruisers that should replace the Ticonderoga? And there, apparently, everything is very sad if the admirals are in such a hurry to write them off. Where are the new destroyers that should replace the Bjorks and Zamvolts?
  10. Doccor18
    Doccor18 16 January 2022 12: 36
    +10
    Initially, it was clear that eight would not do.
    A beautiful ship. Worthy work of the Chinese comrades.
  11. Opiuk
    Opiuk 16 January 2022 12: 41
    +4
    Considering the failure of the American Zumwalt, the Type 055 can be called the best destroyer in the world.
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 16 January 2022 13: 26
      +1
      SizhonVeliky has more basic types of missiles - 80 MK41 cells + 48 Korean TLU cells for cruise missiles with a range of 1200-1500 km + 16 anti-ship missiles.
      1. UGM159
        UGM159 16 January 2022 14: 04
        +6
        Sejong the Great - SPY-1D PFAR
        055 - 346A/B AFAR
        Sejong the Great - MK-41 VLS (length 6.7m, base size 0.635x0.635m)
        055 - HT-1 VLS (length 9.0m, base size 0.850x0.850m)
  12. sen
    sen 16 January 2022 12: 41
    +11
    This is the attitude of the Chinese towards their country. If we thought more not about our own pocket, but about Russia, you see, we would have it too.
  13. donavi49
    donavi49 16 January 2022 12: 44
    +14
    Well, the article is either not very fresh or very inaccurate.

    Now there are 3 destroyers in the fleet - Nanchang and it runs actively across the seas, Lhasa, it also runs but less actively, Dalian - does not run much yet, but it is accepted by Xi himself.


    Also 103 Anshan is accepted but there is no video-photo of the ceremony.


    However, this is not surprising, the second UDC was accepted and he had already escaped quietly too.


    And yet, the article was written on the basis of the fact that all 8x055s are already on the water.



    And in the Far and Shanghai places are not empty, but at the moment it is still quite difficult to determine what is there - 052DL or 055.
  14. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 16 January 2022 12: 46
    +2
    This is what it means to be treated kindly by the West for some time. We need our technologies, please. But they didn’t let us buy Opel. One conclusion, they are afraid.
    1. evgen1221
      evgen1221 16 January 2022 13: 10
      +1
      We once bought an Aston Martin, played enough with the FSC from this and immediately sold it, my son couldn’t go into production, he could rob a conditional Voronezh. And why so.)))
      1. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 16 January 2022 13: 40
        +2
        I know my son has played enough. It turns out that the staff needs to pay salaries in English and not in Russian ..
        1. evgen1221
          evgen1221 16 January 2022 16: 48
          +3
          Actually, this is the answer - why our managers are not allowed to steer in established countries, our undersized parasites are seriously engaged in production. So they keep them away, let them into the garden, as it will be in the Russian Federation.
          1. tralflot1832
            tralflot1832 16 January 2022 17: 52
            -1
            But with gas and oil in Europe, it turns out great. From Israel to England. Just stuff at least, Gazprom's daughters for a ruble.
            1. evgen1221
              evgen1221 16 January 2022 18: 04
              +3
              A communal apartment with housing and communal services in general, no less than a vacuum cleaner, in places, people were pierced, correspondent accounts from payments went directly abroad.
              1. tralflot1832
                tralflot1832 16 January 2022 18: 12
                0
                Familiarly, the director of housing and communal services is a millionaire out of the blue. With Zhek, you can and should fight. The law allows, this is especially true in new buildings.
  15. UGM159
    UGM159 16 January 2022 12: 54
    +2
    055 will become carriers of hypersonic weapons - YJ21 (maximum launch range up to 1200 km)
  16. Moskovit
    Moskovit 16 January 2022 13: 00
    +5
    The Chinese authorities do not forget about the country or the people, and naturally remember themselves. And they all succeed. Dragon))
  17. Yuri Siritsky_2
    Yuri Siritsky_2 16 January 2022 14: 04
    +5
    Russia, if it itself cannot build destroyers, then it would turn to China.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 16 January 2022 14: 34
      -6
      We don’t need copies of other people’s ships with weapons; we create everything ourselves - it takes a lot of time and money.
      1. Ingvar 72
        Ingvar 72 16 January 2022 15: 06
        +5
        Quote: Vadim237
        we are all created by ourselves - it takes a lot of time and money.

        What are you, Vadik? belay And what was created (and adopted)? Yes, preferably in comparison with Chinese counterparts in terms of cost.
        P.S. You would not be weird Vadik. China's contribution to R&D is second only to the United States. And in terms of the number of issued patents, they are in first place, and Russia flew out of the top ten last year in this indicator. So do not la-la, "the caravan is moving."
        1. vostok68
          vostok68 16 January 2022 15: 49
          -3
          Igorek, is the number of issued patents an unambiguous indicator of scientific and technological achievements?
          1. Ingvar 72
            Ingvar 72 16 January 2022 16: 09
            +3
            Quote: vostok68
            and the number of issued patents is an unambiguous indicator of scientific and technological achievements?

            Not unambiguous. But one of the main indicators of the development of science.
      2. Sandor Clegane
        Sandor Clegane 16 January 2022 16: 17
        +6
        Quote: Vadim237
        We do not need copies of other people's ships with weapons

        needed and how!
        but you are definitely not needed with stupid posts
  18. gsev
    gsev 18 January 2022 15: 58
    0
    Quote: antivirus
    have they already begun to prepare 10 crew compositions (with duplication) for 10 Av or have they simply not announced aloud?

    The PRC does not seem to be going to fight either off the coast of Australia or off the coast of India. Three Aircraft Carriers are able to withstand the US at the level of the second line of islands. That is, with three aircraft carriers, the PRC intends to inflict unacceptable damage on the aggressor when he tries to bombard the PRC with tomohawks.