The CSTO Secretariat confirmed the start of the peacekeeping operation on the territory of Kazakhstan

164

The CSTO countries have begun the introduction of the organization's peacekeeping forces into the territory of Kazakhstan as part of the provision of military assistance. As stated in the CSTO secretariat, servicemen from Russia, Belarus, Armenia, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan are taking part in the operation.

The CSTO confirmed the introduction of peacekeeping forces into the territory of Kazakhstan, stressing that they are being introduced for a limited time period to stabilize and normalize the situation. The main tasks of the CSTO military personnel will be the protection of state and military facilities in large cities, in Baikonur and other places, as well as assistance to Kazakhstani law enforcement officers in stabilizing the situation.



It is emphasized that the introduction of peacekeepers is not interference in the internal affairs of Kazakhstan, the decision was made collectively after the official appeal of the president of a sovereign state and in accordance with the CSTO charter.


It is confirmed that Russia has sent airborne units to Kazakhstan; at present, military transport aircraft of the VTA VKS are transferring personnel and equipment of paratroopers to the territory of the republic, details are not provided. What units are being introduced by other countries is not reported, but the advanced units have already begun to perform tasks as intended.

Recall that the President of Kazakhstan, Kassym-Zhomart Tokayev, appealed to the CSTO with a request to introduce peacekeeping forces into the territory of Kazakhstan to neutralize the terrorist threat. He called his appeal "appropriate and timely."
164 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -59
    6 January 2022 11: 56
    Why is the operation called military, and not police or anti-terrorist as a last resort?
    Who attacked Kazakhstan? Is there an official confirmation that we are talking about a war and some kind of enemy?
    Why not call a spade a spade? Like the CSTO, it will help the government suppress protests and riots.
    1. +20
      6 January 2022 12: 07
      All these questions are correct and good.
      That's just time !!! Until you solve ALL of them, country bye-bye. So it's better to take action first, and then slowly resolve legal issues.
      1. +2
        6 January 2022 12: 40
        These issues have long been stipulated in the CSTO treaty itself and ratified by all parties. The question is, why these measures were not applied in the 14th among the independent ones?
        1. +35
          6 January 2022 12: 48
          Quote: seacap
          These issues have long been stipulated in the CSTO treaty itself and ratified by all parties. The question is, why these measures were not applied in the 14th among the independent ones?

          Because Ukraine has never been a member of the CSTO ...
          1. +3
            6 January 2022 13: 08
            But Yanyk's appeal did take place .. And Syria is also not a member of the ODKB ..
            1. +5
              6 January 2022 13: 13
              Quote: Palmyra
              But Yanyk's appeal did take place ..

              I don’t remember this, maybe remind with links ...
              1. +1
                6 January 2022 14: 24

                Such was the appeal
          2. +4
            6 January 2022 13: 30
            It is clear that it was less necessary for our "gifted" to iron the pipe and shove the loot into their pockets.
        2. +6
          6 January 2022 15: 58
          Yanyk asked for help from the Russian Federation at 14 to destroy the Nazis? I don’t remember something ...
      2. -18
        6 January 2022 12: 48
        It is emphasized that the introduction of peacekeepers is not interference in the internal affairs of Kazakhstan, the decision was made collectively after the official appeal of the president of a sovereign state and in accordance with the CSTO charter.

        In theory, will the United States interfere in the internal affairs of Ukraine if, after the appeal of the President of Ukraine, the US government, collegially with the Ukrainian government, sends peacekeeping forces to suppress illegal formations in accordance with the UN Charter (which spells out the duty of states to cooperate with each other in ensuring security)?
        1. +2
          6 January 2022 14: 02
          Quote: military_cat
          Theoretically, will the US interfere in the internal affairs of Ukraine if, after the appeal of the President of Ukraine, the US government, collegially with the government of Ukraine, sends peacekeeping forces to suppress illegal formations in accordance with the UN Charter

          We are looking at the text of the Charter on Strategic Partnership between the United States and Ukraine, signed by US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken and Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba in Washington, DC, November 10, 2021:
          Section I: Principles of Cooperation
          -Supporting sovereignty, independence, territorial integrity and inviolability of each other's borders is the basis of our bilateral relations.
          Section II: Security and Countering Russian Aggression
          -The United States and Ukraine are united by a vital national interest in a strong, independent and democratic Ukraine. Strengthening Ukraine's ability to reflect threats to territorial integrity and deepening Ukrainian integration into Euro-Atlantic institutions are mutual priorities.
          - the United States supports Ukraine's right to independently determine its future foreign policy course, without any external interference, including with respect to Ukraine's desire to join NATO.
        2. +2
          6 January 2022 14: 16
          Quote: military_cat
          Theoretically - will the US interfere in the internal affairs of Ukraine,

          Even theoretically, it will not be until Ukraine receives direct investments from the United States and other empiricalists ...
          Indirect investments (for example: loans) will not be protected by anyone ....
          And surely no one will fight for the "ancient Sumerians" ...
          You can google what is the external corporate debt of Ukraine (its companies to the Empireist Banks) and to whom ..... accordingly, if Ukraine wants to be protected, it needs to seek direct investment in its economy from the Empireist side, and the more such investments there will be, the more secure it will be, but in order for direct investment to come (note: factories built by the empiricalists, concessions, etc.), an investment climate must be created for this - a "package" of laws, improvement of infrastructure, training of personnel to service investment projects of the empiricalists, etc. etc.
          In the meantime, only Ze yells, like a victim, that Russian tanks will soon come and gas transit will stop ...
          How Bulgarians and Turks will set up greenhouses, and the Chinese will plant soybeans in Ukraine when there is a shortage of gas, fertilizers, electricity in the country ...
          Therefore, the empiricalists need an eternal transit of gas to Ukraine so that they can bring their big business there ...
          On the other hand, the empirialists, sooner or later, will force the "ancient Sumerians" to shut down two western nuclear power plants from sin ...
      3. +9
        6 January 2022 13: 48
        Quote: Cat Alexandrovich
        All these questions are correct and good.
        That's just time !!! Until you solve ALL of them, country bye-bye. So it's better to take action first, and then slowly resolve legal issues.

        Back in the days of the Minsk Maidan, here at the forum the topic was discussed that the next Maidan would be in Kazakhstan. Why is everyone not ready again? Because the governments do not read comments on articles on VO. Otherwise they would have learned a lot of new things for themselves.
        1. +4
          6 January 2022 14: 25
          Information that a bucha is being prepared in Kazakhstan slipped back in 2020, they even called the period January 2021, but it just started a year later. A friend lives in Alma-Ata, I asked him in 2020 how the mood in the country was, he said that everything was calm. The last time we talked now, in the afternoon on January 2, now they will not get through, neither via the Internet, nor by mobile.
          1. +1
            6 January 2022 16: 34
            The fact that a coup was being prepared there was clear since the 90s, when the same thing began there, and according to one scenario as in the independent one, but according to the eastern one it was quiet and without yelling with jumpers. Russophobia there became a policy long ago, when discrimination on the basis of ethnicity began, when the mass resettlement of Russian-speakers to our vast expanses began from their homes. At the same time, in order to stake out Russian lands, a massive renaming of cities and Cossack villages began, the notorious transfer of the capital of the Kyrgyz Republic to Tselinograd. All this with the complete inaction of our "gifted" boyars, who, in their helplessness and complete failure, only smeared snot on their cheeks, and shoved the loot into their pockets.
    2. +8
      6 January 2022 12: 12
      Quote: Hiroo Onoda
      Who attacked Kazakhstan?

      fool Wake up! The Japanese in the city yell, "Banzai!" feel
    3. -5
      6 January 2022 12: 13
      Because this is the Prague Spring 2.0 the same rake, so I don’t want to.
    4. +10
      6 January 2022 12: 14
      Quote: Hiroo Onoda
      Why is the operation called military, and not police or anti-terrorist as a last resort?
      Who attacked Kazakhstan? Is there an official confirmation that we are talking about a war and some kind of enemy?
      Why not call a spade a spade? Like the CSTO, it will help the government suppress protests and riots.



      Who called this operation military? Where was it said about the attack on Kazakhstan? Do you even know how to read?
      1. +2
        6 January 2022 12: 41
        Quote: 1976AG
        Who called this operation military? Where was it said about the attack on Kazakhstan?

        So the Democratic guys came to the sites, and we were all thinking where they had disappeared. And liberal infa came from them.
        1. -1
          6 January 2022 13: 51
          Quote: tihonmarine
          So the Democratic guys came to the sites, and we were all thinking where they had disappeared. And liberal infa came from them.

          "The guys are democrats" got the Central Administration from the curators from the UWB and started to shout ... they scribble laughing for distillation. and not for nothing, but for pennies made at the omerige ...
          1. -1
            6 January 2022 14: 23
            Quote: 30 vis
            scribble on distillation. and not for nothing, but for pennies made at the omerige ...

            Already started to take offense.
        2. -1
          6 January 2022 14: 22
          Quote: tihonmarine
          So the Democratic guys arrived in time on the sites

          Yes, why, on the New Year holidays, so many evil spirits climbed out, against the background of them, even you stopped enraging me ...
          1. +2
            6 January 2022 14: 26
            Quote: Lara Croft
            Yes, why, on the New Year's holidays, so many evil spirits climbed out, against the background of them, even you stopped enraging me ...

            So there is something to compare with. Nothing will go away, and I will start to enrage you again. Sincerely.
      2. 0
        6 January 2022 13: 32
        Quote: 1976AG
        Who called this operation military?

        Is your vision all right?
        And with the Russian language?
        Have you even bothered to read the article? Overpowered? Specifically, this paragraph:
        "The CSTO countries have begun the introduction of the organization's peacekeeping forces into the territory of Kazakhstan as part of the provision of military help. As stated in the CSTO secretariat, servicemen from Russia, Belarus, Armenia, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan are taking part in the operation. "
    5. Cat
      +5
      6 January 2022 12: 18
      What's the difference between sepukka and hara-kiri?
      1. +6
        6 January 2022 12: 33
        Quote: Gato
        What's the difference between sepukka and hara-kiri?

        The same as between the killer the killer. No difference. But in the first version it is kind of prettier. But the meaning is the same.
      2. +1
        6 January 2022 12: 43
        Quote: Gato
        What's the difference between sepukka and hara-kiri?

        Well, it's like someone from the fifth floor was pushed, or he himself fell. But the end is one.
      3. +2
        6 January 2022 14: 36
        Roughly speaking, hara-kiri is a process (i.e., ripping open the abdomen), and sepukku is a ritual, that is, something sublime. Although both actions are indicated by the same hieroglyphs.
    6. 0
      6 January 2022 12: 18
      Quote: Hiroo Onoda
      Why is the operation called military, and not police or anti-terrorist as a last resort?
      Who attacked Kazakhstan? Is there an official confirmation that we are talking about a war and some kind of enemy?

      Think what
      / TASS /. Kazakhstan turned to its partners in the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) for help due to the situation in the country. President of the republic Kassym-Zhomart Tokayev on Wednesday evening called what was happening an act of aggression, and the participants in the riots - "terrorist gangs" trained abroad.
    7. +2
      6 January 2022 12: 26
      what "The CSTO Secretariat confirmed the start peacekeeping operations "(c) And where is there about a military operation? You have to be more careful. hi
      1. 0
        6 January 2022 12: 44
        Quote: Emergency
        And where is the military operation?

        The Democrats.
        1. -1
          6 January 2022 13: 19
          I would call them "demshiza" hi
          1. -1
            6 January 2022 16: 36
            Quote: VORON538
            I would call them "demshiza"

            An acquaintance of mine invented another witty term - "liberda"
      2. 0
        6 January 2022 14: 03
        Quote: Emergency
        "The CSTO Secretariat confirmed the start of the peacekeeping operation

        Those. in our newspeak now rendering military assistance is already named peacekeeping?
        No matter how I try to combine these two concepts more closely, it does not work.
        At one time, I also could not understand who fought with whom - either Oceania with Eastasia, or vice versa ...
    8. SSR
      +3
      6 January 2022 12: 26
      Not sure, but Imha.
      Quote: Hiroo Onoda
      Who attacked Kazakhstan? Is there an official confirmation that we are talking about a war and some kind of enemy?

      1. There is a statement about the external management of "protests".
      2. Since the Armed Forces are involved at this stage, the operation is also military.
      3. In the future, it will probably be renamed to something "optimal" for everyone.

      In general, a hybrid war is underway.
    9. +7
      6 January 2022 12: 27
      Quote: Hiroo Onoda
      Why is the operation called military

      It is called not "military" but "peacekeeping"
      1. +1
        6 January 2022 12: 41
        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
        Quote: Hiroo Onoda
        Why is the operation called military

        It is called not "military" but "peacekeeping"

        Fixed the title, I'm satisfied)
        1. +3
          6 January 2022 12: 46
          Quote: Hiroo Onoda
          Fixed the title, I'm satisfied)

          :)))))
        2. +1
          6 January 2022 16: 38
          Quote: Hiroo Onoda
          Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
          Quote: Hiroo Onoda
          Why is the operation called military

          It is called not "military" but "peacekeeping"

          Fixed the title, I'm satisfied)

          It's time for you to lie down, and you are scribbling everything here smile
      2. +2
        6 January 2022 12: 46
        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
        It is called not "military" but "peacekeeping"

        But some really want it to be a military one, then it will be possible to pour a lot of dirt on Russia and the DBK. And so already the screeching began in Europe.
        1. +6
          6 January 2022 12: 48
          Quote: tihonmarine
          But some really want it to be a military one, then it will be possible to pour a lot of dirt on Russia and the DBK.

          You might think they need a reason :)))) Hailey like, and that's the end of it
    10. -8
      6 January 2022 12: 54
      The people want to overthrow the hated, deceitful, vile and greedy government. Our bureaucrats began to stir. After all, everyone is tied there. They feed only thanks to the people. And they spend money in the West. But here they constantly want to convey to everyone the smart idea that the West is to blame.
      1. +6
        6 January 2022 13: 38
        Quote: MikhailRus
        The people want to overthrow the hated, deceitful, vile and greedy government. Our bureaucrats began to stir. After all, everyone is tied there. They feed only thanks to the people. And they spend money in the West. But here they constantly want to convey to everyone the smart idea that the West is to blame.



        So if dissatisfaction with the government is an internal matter of the state, then why the hell did Nuland come to the protesters in Ukraine? Or is she a citizen of Ukraine? And people like you always shield amerikosov. They always have nothing to do with it, even when they stage coups. But you can try hard, their ears are too visible to be ignored. And then, what is happening in Kazakhstan cannot be called a peaceful action. The protesters have firearms. Does that remind you of anything? Maybe take off your rose-colored glasses already?
        1. -2
          6 January 2022 13: 54
          I took off my glasses a long time ago in relation to Putin's stability. And why shield? They are constantly shielded by our bureaucrats. I still remember how some delegation arrived at the Duma and how everyone joyfully clapped them while standing.
          1. +1
            6 January 2022 13: 58
            Quote: MikhailRus
            I took off my glasses a long time ago in relation to Putin's stability. And why shield? They are constantly shielded by our bureaucrats. I still remember how some delegation arrived at the Duma and how everyone joyfully clapped them while standing.


            And what is Putin's connection with the coup in Ukraine and the events in Kazakhstan?
            1. -4
              6 January 2022 17: 03
              So listen to you, Putin has nothing to do with it anywhere. And who is he then? A doll of shadow politics?
              1. +1
                6 January 2022 19: 03
                You have not answered my question. Putin staged a coup in Ukraine or organized riots in Kazakhstan?
      2. 0
        6 January 2022 16: 46
        Quote: MikhailRus
        The people want to overthrow the hated, deceitful, vile and greedy government. Our bureaucrats began to stir. After all, everyone is tied there. They feed only thanks to the people. And they spend money in the West. But here they constantly want to convey to everyone the smart idea that the West is to blame.

        [media = https: //youtu.be/sbWePBKF8X4]
        This reflects the meaning of your post.
        Do you know how many people were jailed there? For how long?
        In Kazakhstan, the people went out, and continued with robberies, looting.
        Shops have been destroyed, a dutik at the Almaty airport will now be hiding with a looted, "solid-drawn" smile swag.

        PS. For some reason, the video with the storming of the Capitol is not displayed smile
        Well, nicho nicho. Be aware that in exile there is the storming of the Capitol by the outraged American people who want to overthrow ... and further on in your post.
    11. -13
      6 January 2022 12: 57
      Why did none of the commentators ask themselves a question, why should the CSTO decide its own internal affairs? Why did the security forces side with the protesters? Maybe not everything is as straightforward as it is presented by the controlled media? And why should the Russian Federation go into the internal affairs of a neighboring state? Maybe some crooks help others to stay at the trough and in power? As for the saucepan, then you probably need to take off your rose-colored glasses and look at the surrounding reality.
      1. +8
        6 January 2022 13: 11
        Quote: lis-ik
        Why did none of the commentators ask themselves a question, why should the CSTO decide its own internal affairs?

        because, lis-ik, that these "internal affairs" affect the state. security of all listed countries.
        Quote: lis-ik
        Why did the security forces side with the protesters?

        You and Radio Liberty are talking about it
        Quote: lis-ik
        Maybe not everything is as unambiguous as presented by the controlled media?

        of course, everything is not clear
        with the garbage that surfaced on VO on the wave of Kazakh information and rumors.
        1. -5
          6 January 2022 13: 15
          Quote: Flood

          of course, everything is not clear
          with the garbage that surfaced on VO on the wave of Kazakh information and rumors.

          The case is clear. All around there are enemies and agents of the State Department. Who else can blame everything on. Only every time, as it does not sound convincing.
          1. +4
            6 January 2022 13: 22
            Quote: lis-ik
            All around there are enemies and agents of the State Department. Who else can you blame everything on?

            Sometimes it will be worse than an enemy agent.
            1. -10
              6 January 2022 13: 28
              Quote: Flood
              Quote: lis-ik
              All around there are enemies and agents of the State Department. Who else can you blame everything on?

              Sometimes it will be worse than an enemy agent.

              About yourself, or what?
              1. +5
                6 January 2022 13: 49
                Quote: lis-ik
                About yourself, or what?

                about fools and spies
                don't take it so personally
                1. -2
                  6 January 2022 13: 57
                  Quote: Flood
                  Quote: lis-ik
                  About yourself, or what?

                  about fools and spies
                  don't take it so personally

                  Well done. Another thing is strange. Why are there so many spies? Maybe the people are simply more intolerant of arbitrariness, which in such numbers is unlikely to be able to raise, no matter how hard the agents of the State Department and other evil spirits of the federal media try.
                  1. +3
                    6 January 2022 14: 15
                    Quote: lis-ik
                    Maybe the people are simply more intolerant of arbitrariness, which in such numbers is unlikely to be able to raise, no matter how hard the agents of the State Department and other evil spirits of the federal media try.

                    no one praises thieves and covetous people in power
                    but of two evils the lesser should be chosen
                    hoping to change life for the better

                    and those dissatisfied with life, and quite rightly dissatisfied, have always been, are and will be
                    and in 1905, and in 1917, and in 1993, and in 2014
                    it is not difficult to manage and manipulate people with the resources
        2. -4
          6 January 2022 13: 44
          quote = Navodlom] and Radio Liberty [/ quote]
          I would love to listen to the Skabeyevs-Nightingale-Kiselevs all day long. Seriously. 24 hours a day. No meal breaks.
          But there's a problem. They are already starting to feel nauseous. Well, it's just a disaster.
          Do you have such trouble? I envy. Excellent health.
          For what remains ironic, leave people to find reliable sources of information on their own. It will be "Svoboda" or the Russian media - everyone's personal business. If I am not mistaken, we are not yet living in a concentration camp.
          1. +4
            6 January 2022 13: 51
            Quote: Cosm22
            Do you have such trouble? I envy. Excellent health.

            there is a huge range between Radio Liberty and programs with the participation of Solovyov.

            in which I manage to find information at the very least.

            Quote: Cosm22
            For what remains beyond irony, let people look for reliable sources of information on their own.


            namely RELIABLE
            what Freedom is hard to suspect
            but since you closed your exhausted comrade with yourself, then tell me how reliable this information is

            Quote: lis-ik
            power structures sided with the protesters


            let's fight for the truth together
            1. -2
              6 January 2022 14: 22
              I'm afraid it won't work together.
              We are looking for this very truth in different sources.
              If you noticed, I have not yet said a single word about specific events taking place in Kazakhstan. Did not give a single figure, did not make a single link.
              For everything that is being said now is from the category of OBS. Too little time has passed since the beginning of the events, these events have already begun to be presented in our media too tendentiously. Such "efficiency" involuntarily leads to some reflections ...
              1. 0
                6 January 2022 14: 26
                Quote: Cosm22
                For everything that is being said now is from the category of OBS.

                This is precisely the difficulty - in a moment of uncertainty and uncertainty, to make a decision on which side I am on

                after a while looking back, we are all Napoleons
          2. -1
            6 January 2022 14: 03
            Quote: Cosm22
            Do you have such trouble? I envy. Excellent health

            I haven't watched a zombie box for more than four years. Therefore, he is probably healthy for now. I don’t listen to "Svoboda" either, I read selectively articles on the Internet, first on the one hand, then on the other, and draw conclusions. I stopped listening to the radio in the car, I prefer audiobooks. Tell me really to listen to or watch the modern federal media, not only are the problems with diction absolutely illiterate, but also the propaganda is very clumsy, which rather plays the opposite role than it is assigned to.
            1. +3
              6 January 2022 14: 18
              Quote: lis-ik
              For more than four years I have not watched the zombie box

              support
              I have been without television for the sixth year
              1. +1
                6 January 2022 16: 14
                Quote: Flood
                support
                I have been without television for the sixth year

                I don’t want to upset you, but the Internet today is an even bigger zombie box and a trash heap ...

                Therefore, you need to have information from all sides ... in order to make at least a somewhat close conclusion to reality - although, here how lucky you really are ...
                1. 0
                  6 January 2022 16: 16
                  Quote: Dali
                  I don’t want to upset you, but the Internet today is an even bigger zombie box and a trash heap ...

                  a. you have not upset me in the least. I have come to terms with this fact for a long time.
                  b. there is more freedom of choice on the Internet. and you don't have to dig through the trash heaps to find something worthwhile.
                  1. -1
                    11 January 2022 19: 02
                    Quote: Flood
                    there is more freedom of choice on the Internet. and you don't have to dig through the trash heaps to find something worthwhile.

                    And what prevents you from freely analyzing TV?
                    And what does not prevent you from freely analyzing the Internet?
                    laughing
                    1. 0
                      11 January 2022 19: 16
                      Quote: Dali

                      And what prevents you from freely analyzing TV?
                      And what does not prevent you from freely analyzing the Internet?

                      everything is simple - on the internet it is much easier to work with an array of information
                      1. -1
                        11 January 2022 19: 18
                        Quote: Flood
                        everything is simple - on the internet it is much easier to work with an array of information

                        But in this you are greatly mistaken ...
                        Although, as you wish, my business is. say a little ... to accept or not to accept your case.
                  2. -1
                    11 January 2022 19: 03
                    Quote: Flood
                    more freedom of choice on the Internet

                    Or are you not about freedom of choice, but about freedom of obscenity ?! belay
                    1. 0
                      11 January 2022 19: 18
                      Quote: Dali
                      Or are you not about freedom of choice, but about freedom of obscenity

                      this is also freedom of choice
                      someone is interested in low-grade stuffing
                      someone is looking for quality information
                      this does not mean that I am satisfied with the Internet in the form in which it exists
                      1. -1
                        11 January 2022 19: 21
                        Quote: Flood
                        this is also freedom of choice

                        Well, you can agree on many things ... that is, freedom or permissiveness ... the line can be very thin.
                      2. 0
                        11 January 2022 20: 00
                        Quote: Dali
                        Well, you can agree on many things ... that is, freedom or permissiveness ... the line can be very thin.

                        certainly
                        man in general is a criminally free being
                        I guess this also has a part of the Great Design
                      3. -1
                        11 January 2022 19: 23
                        Quote: Flood
                        someone is interested in low-grade stuffing
                        someone is looking for quality information

                        Are you 100% sure that you can determine the quality information from the stuffing? Or is the high quality stuffing not already stuffing? belay
                      4. 0
                        11 January 2022 20: 05
                        Quote: Dali
                        Are you 100% sure that you can determine the quality information from the stuffing?

                        it's a matter of faith and belief
                        I decide for myself personally under my personal responsibility to myself

                        difficulties begin when you share this information with others
                        here the factor of conscience and responsibility already arises
      2. +3
        6 January 2022 13: 16
        Quote: lis-ik
        And why should the Russian Federation go into the internal affairs of a neighboring state?

        Well, Russia will not fit, America will fit, a tidbit there, and a strategic place, and Russia and China are on the border. And the border with Russia is very unpleasant 7500 km. even if with Ukraine 3000 km. including sea.
      3. -1
        6 January 2022 20: 25
        In 2014, too, everything began as a "fight between crooks among themselves," so it's easier to crush right in the bud. Especially since American ears stick out from there.
    12. +3
      6 January 2022 12: 59
      I am tormented by vague doubts, is not the saucepan pressing on your head?
      1. -4
        6 January 2022 13: 11
        Quote: Gray Wolf_30
        I am tormented by vague doubts, is not the saucepan pressing on your head?

        Do not doubt. A sober analysis of what is happening and detachment from stupid agitation is not about you. Watch more TV, mostly a couple of bracelets, do not be distracted by what is really happening and, most importantly, put the water in the can to be charged during the speeches of the president and his friends.
        1. +2
          6 January 2022 13: 24
          5 points, colleague. Well, there is no clear information, so it's too early to draw conclusions. And then it may be too late.
        2. 0
          6 January 2022 16: 36
          By the way, the Internet has appeared in Astana. At least, our server became visible there. In Karaganda and Alma Ata - no.
    13. +2
      6 January 2022 13: 08
      Quote: Hiroo Onoda
      Why is the operation called military, and not police or anti-terrorist as a last resort?

      an attempted coup requires what kind of intervention?
      anti-terrorist?
      a policeman?
      military?
      Underline whatever applicable
    14. +5
      6 January 2022 13: 13
      The ODKB forces are not in order to fight the Kazakhs, they will take control of strategic objects there, thereby helping to unload the forces. And the order will be established by the Kazakhs themselves.
    15. 0
      6 January 2022 13: 37
      On occasion, they will tell you everything you need.
    16. 0
      6 January 2022 13: 52
      read the CSTO Charter
    17. -1
      6 January 2022 19: 28
      The CSTO countries began input of peacekeeping forces organizations to the territory of Kazakhstan in the framework of military assistance.

      Where did you find the mention of a military operation?
      Who attacked Kazakhstan?

      And who walks in the city at night armed, shoots, kills, cuts off the heads of the military? Don't you have an answer to these questions?
      Can you help clean up order and suppress protests?
    18. -3
      6 January 2022 20: 22
      because during the protests, 18 security officials have already died and this is no longer riots, but terrorism
  2. +25
    6 January 2022 11: 58
    Isn't it possible for Tokayev himself to knock on the kumpol with these peacekeepers? Otherwise, they warned him that they were leading the country in the wrong direction. At least a count on their heads amuse them: that Yanukovych, that Lukashenko. Now this one, another multi-vector.
    1. Cat
      +11
      6 January 2022 12: 19
      to knock Tokayev himself on kumpol?

      This is the most interesting question. And do not forget the Elbasy either. Otherwise, with the help of the peacekeepers, they will remain at the trough and continue to wag the vector.
      1. +2
        6 January 2022 12: 27
        Yes. It is obvious that he has demonstrated incompetence.
        1. 0
          6 January 2022 19: 38
          Did you want him to pull the cat by the tail like Yanuca?
          And why then there is the CSTO, which, moreover, after the recent events in neighboring Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Nagorno-Karabakh, was "imprisoned" in the event of such events!
      2. +2
        6 January 2022 14: 00
        Quote: Gato
        This is the most interesting question. And do not forget the Elbasy either. Otherwise, with the help of the peacekeepers, they will remain at the trough and continue to wag the vector.

        Squinting eyes will screw up and will climb like a drill in the same course ... There is such a habit among all independent pyrisidenttivs ... Zdest only beat on the forehead, put before a fact and break.
    2. +27
      6 January 2022 12: 27
      Quote: Roma-1977
      Isn't it possible for Tokayev himself to knock on the kumpol with these peacekeepers? Otherwise, they warned him that they were leading the country in the wrong direction. At least a count on their heads amuse them: that Yanukovych, that Lukashenko. Now this one, another multi-vector.

      Tokayev is not as simple as you think. On the contrary, he will be smarter and smarter than Nazarbayev. There are very strong hints that Tokayev himself and his Team arranged all this in order to finally push aside the Nazarbayev clan and his Family. Well, along the way, solve all the accumulated issues. So Tokayev is currently holding the reins tightly and has concentrated all power in his hands. Nazarbayev is completely on the sidelines and no longer has any leverage. The army is completely subordinate to Tokayev, like almost all the security forces. Plus, he works very subtly both with the CSTO and directly with the leadership of the Russian Federation. I hope that everything was agreed with us. But the fact that Tokayev is a very smart politician cannot be taken away. It is enough to see how he talked / built himself a couple of years ago and how he looks / speaks now.
      Whether it is good for Russia or bad - time will tell. I think that it was not in vain that Tokayev pushed aside the Nazarbayev clan - in recent years, he was pulling Kazakhstan right into the hands of the West.
      Most likely, if I'm right, then Kazakhstan will be taken into the orbit of a Union State like Belarus within a few years. I would like to hope so. But the fact that the CSTO was invited and everyone responded is very significant and indicative. This is probably the first time.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Cat
        +4
        6 January 2022 14: 34
        everyone responded

        It is understandable - today with you, and tomorrow it may be with us. But I liked the efficiency - no companionship, contact, calls and the planes are already in the air.
    3. +3
      6 January 2022 12: 29
      Most likely they will snitch. Only a narrow circle of people will know about this, to whom we unfortunately do not belong. winked
    4. 0
      6 January 2022 12: 38
      Wah, wah .... yesterday I wrote about multi-vector, so they pushed the minuses, a bunch and everything is anonymous.
      Today, already, not the same salam ... much is clear who and how much! The "inspired" were absorbed through the cracks.
    5. +3
      6 January 2022 12: 48
      Quote: Roma-1977
      Otherwise, they warned him that they were leading the country in the wrong direction. At least a count on their heads amuse them: that Yanukovych, that Lukashenko.

      We talk about it like this - "Two rolls cannot be held in one hand."
      1. +3
        6 January 2022 14: 24
        Like Vishnevsky:
        One and the same booty
        Sit on different trains!
      2. Cat
        +1
        6 January 2022 14: 36
        We talk about it like this - "Two rolls cannot be held in one hand."

        We say that trying to sit on two chairs makes the butt very vulnerable. lol
    6. -9
      6 January 2022 12: 48
      I'm interested in something else - well, they brought in troops, what next? No matter how they broadcast, it is obvious that the nonesh authorities ostamoneli people in the region. And now - we have come to defend them. Wonderful! How long will it take before they start shooting at us? Considering that the local Putin's sidekick sidekicks for 30 years have inspired the people that the Russians are invaders? Did he turn a blind eye to it? How long will it take before we start shooting back? And - hello, blood feud against the invaders. Away we go ..

      Alas, we must honestly admit that the introduction of troops cannot offer the Kazakhs any positive goals. Don't count the protection of local bais as such? Actually, our authorities inside the country can offer absolutely nothing positive, what can we say about our neighbors? This means that the introduction of troops is a mistake. And not to bring in troops is also a mistake !! Our wisest politician of our time has finished badly, be vigorous ..
      1. +2
        6 January 2022 13: 20
        Quote: paul3390
        I'm interested in something else - well, they brought in troops, what next?

        "The collective peacekeeping forces do not participate in hostilities. Their main tasks, according to the CSTO statutory documents, are: monitoring the implementation of the terms of the armistice and the ceasefire agreement; creating a safe environment in crisis areas by ensuring the visible presence of peacekeepers; identifying areas of responsibility; creating conditions for negotiations. ; control of the terrain and actions of the population; protection and defense of vital facilities; ensuring unhindered supplies of humanitarian aid. "

        let the authorities and people of Kazakhstan decide the rest
      2. +1
        6 January 2022 13: 23
        The peacekeepers did not enter the Kazakhs to shoot, they took control of strategic objects, freeing the internal troops. Thus, they received moral and actual support.
        1. -3
          6 January 2022 13: 32
          Why wear pink pince-nez? Think for yourself - how long will it take before attacks on the objects guarded by us begin? And we - will simply have to shoot back? I think - not very much ..
          1. +1
            6 January 2022 13: 37
            It is not excluded. And it is possible that they are already participating. But who will talk about it ..
          2. 0
            6 January 2022 16: 05
            If the conscripts will not attack, they will get serious guys there, and no one will talk with these violent ones, then they will be defeated.
      3. 0
        6 January 2022 13: 31
        Alas, we must honestly admit that the introduction of troops cannot offer the Kazakhs any positive goals. Don't count the protection of local bais as such? Actually, our authorities inside the country can offer absolutely nothing positive, what can we say about our neighbors?
        You can't argue that the trend is extremely negative. And there is simply no way out of this situation, given the current situation in the country. "Our" intelligence service is not working on it. She is more focused on weaning dough, and not on undercover work in the soft underbelly. Already many times stepping on this rake and everything is not for the future.
  3. +19
    6 January 2022 11: 59
    With God, guys!
  4. +14
    6 January 2022 12: 00
    Tokayev appealed to the CSTO with a request to introduce peacekeeping forces into the territory of Kazakhstan to neutralize the terrorist threat. He called his appeal "appropriate and timely."

    And he did the right thing that he applied to the CSTO so quickly. There are fewer chances that the Kazakh military will begin to go over to the side of the pro-Western fosterlings, become intoxicated by the smell of another Maidan and the inaction of the current government.
  5. +11
    6 January 2022 12: 00
    So that another hostile state does not appear, ruled from Washington. The experience of Yanukovych's concessions must not be forgotten.
    1. -5
      6 January 2022 12: 56
      Yanukovych's experience is not applicable here. Togo - at least somehow supported by part of the population. Which was ready to endure anything - if only not the power of the Westerners. Ukraine was originally split into two parts.

      I think - in Kazakhstan the situation is different .. There - everyone seems to hate the new government. And there is no split along ethnic lines. There is the truth of butting zhuzes - but it is completely incomprehensible how it will play in such situations.
      1. -3
        6 January 2022 13: 17
        There-noneshnuyu power seems to hate everyone.
        - have these "all" already reported to you about universal hatred?
        1. -3
          6 January 2022 13: 33
          No - apparently you were told about universal and passionate love ..
          1. +2
            6 January 2022 13: 36
            well, since no, you don’t need to speak for everyone, all people are different ...
  6. +9
    6 January 2022 12: 01
    Recall that the President of Kazakhstan, Kassym-Zhomart Tokayev, appealed to the CSTO with a request to introduce peacekeeping forces into the territory of Kazakhstan to neutralize the terrorist threat.

    It’s right that I didn’t chew the snot.
    Now I would not be afraid to transfer all the nits.
  7. -27
    6 January 2022 12: 02
    Sound familiar?
    A convoy of planes flies south. The interval of their movement is only ten minutes. We hear a voice on the air: “Falcon, this is the Earth.” We are killed by bullets - we cannot sit down here. Chorus: "Farewell, Union, - I will tell you, - We will return home, but not all. Do not forget our mothers. We are flying to Afghanistan." 2 times. And in battles we grew mature, we lost friends. We performed our duty for the Soviet people. The command sounded: "Come on, friends!"


    https://lyricsonline.ru/42926-toktogaziev-radik-proschay-soyuz.html
    1. +4
      6 January 2022 13: 07
      On August 23, 2021, the leaders of the member states of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) held a video conference on the situation in Afghanistan.

      The session was held by videoconference under the chairmanship of President of Tajikistan Emomali Rahmon. The decision to hold it was made against the background of recent events in Afghanistan. The agenda of the meeting discussed issues of ensuring the security of the CSTO member states in the context of the events in Afghanistan. The leaders of the countries also discussed effective joint response to possible cross-border challenges and threats. [18]
  8. +13
    6 January 2022 12: 02
    We must crush all this abomination! And they will do the right thing!
    1. +2
      6 January 2022 16: 10
      The organizers should be taken and interrogated with partiality.
  9. +4
    6 January 2022 12: 03
    Live streamer
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j46Y6AqerDQ
  10. +3
    6 January 2022 12: 19
    Russia has always fought! more or less. The main thing is not to be afraid to settle down to the best of their ability and dictate their interests.
    1. -11
      6 January 2022 12: 58
      What are our interests in Kazakhstan? Can you formulate? And even those that require the use of force to achieve?
      1. +4
        6 January 2022 13: 09
        Quote: paul3390
        What are our interests in Kazakhstan? Can you formulate? And even those that require the use of force to achieve.

        An open border of thousands of kilometers. Do we need it? Apart from a lot of other things ...
        1. -3
          6 January 2022 13: 12
          It's all? For the sake of the border, will we create a second Afghanistan for ourselves? Something will not be enough .. No - the goals should be close and understandable to both us and the Kazakhs .. Otherwise, there will be problems. Fucking.
          1. -1
            6 January 2022 16: 21
            Quote: paul3390
            For the sake of the border, will we create a second Afghanistan for ourselves?

            You think so, but that does not mean so ...
        2. -1
          6 January 2022 14: 23
          It's hard to think of a dumber answer!
      2. +1
        6 January 2022 15: 46
        there are two million Russians who are humiliated on a national basis, there are schools and hospitals built by Russia (USSR), roads and airports in the steppes with yurts. There is the work and struggle of our grandfathers
  11. +3
    6 January 2022 12: 20
    well, that started. without noise and dust. optimal according to the Transnistrian option. to stand on the lands of the middle zhuz and protect four million Russian-speakers. Well, Baikonur is there under protection and gas fields at Mangyshlak. and let the rest figure it out for themselves.
    1. -17
      6 January 2022 12: 33
      ... to stand on the lands of the middle zhuz and protect four million Russian-speaking

      You are a provocateur. You are trying to divide Kazakhs into correct and incorrect. Kazakhstan is 100% Russian-speaking and there is no need to protect anyone from each other. This is an internal affair of Kazakhstan. The main thing now is to stabilize the situation and withdraw the peacekeepers as soon as possible.
      1. +5
        6 January 2022 12: 37
        Well, no, if ISIS hirelings are frolicking there now under the leadership of nekhta and Ukrainian curators, then we will not leave them alone. No one except Lenin and the communists is to blame for transferring the Semirechensk region, inhabited by Russians, to Kazakhstan. and what is this one-sided look you have? in 91, moldavia was also one hundred percent Russian-speaking, so what? when they began to press the Russian population in transnistria, they had to bring in peacekeepers and stand there for thirty years protecting the Russian-speaking. Well, in your opinion, one should not have entered Transnistria and given the Russian-speaking people to be torn apart by the Moldovan and Romanian Nazis?
      2. +5
        6 January 2022 13: 05
        Quote: OrangeBigg
        Kazakhstan is 100% Russian-speaking and there is no need to protect anyone from each other

        But what about the "language patrols" on the streets. Haven't you heard of them? Did they fall from the moon? And the transition to the Latin alphabet, than Cyrillic did not suit them. After all, everything goes around, according to one scenario. Remember Ukraine, there, too, at first the clock was changed, although we are in the full time zone, then they took up the language. They dragged out their "heroes" who were sitting in the caches. They teach their alternative history in schools. And all in order to have as little as possible in common with Russia.
  12. +3
    6 January 2022 12: 27
    also assistance to Kazakhstani law enforcement officers in stabilizing the situation.
    ... Difficult .... so it is clear that when a part of the load is removed from the national law enforcement forces, this is a plus for them!
    The question is, what is the state of these forces of law and order ??? Whom do they believe, what and whom they are ready to protect ???
  13. +8
    6 January 2022 12: 32
    An adequate response from the CSTO means the organization is viable, the internationalism of peacekeepers against local nationalism, supported by Western and Turkish sponsors. Blind and aggressive nationalism only divides and divides peoples (the example of Ukraine), not in favor but to the detriment of them. This is a modern weapon of the West in the post-Soviet space , in the EU, the French with the Germans, the Spaniards and the British, with each other on ethnic grounds, for some reason, have not been at enmity for a long time as before, the latter really shook the foundations of the EU with their exit. I do not know what Kazakh nationalists want, the EU does not shine for them at all, like the people of Krai, unless Turkish kaganate to their liking?
    1. +8
      6 January 2022 12: 46
      Quote: anjey
      An adequate response from the CSTO means the organization is viable,

      By the way, yes, I also wanted to note this positive moment. Even Pashinyan was surprised, as it seemed to me he would try to stay away, but the roast rooster in the form of events in Karabakh apparently pecked him too ... And the events in Afghanistan showed to the rest of the Central Asian republics that except for Russia, if something happens, they have no one to hope for ...
      1. +5
        6 January 2022 12: 55
        In all republics, you need to fight tactfully, creatively and subtly against terry nationalism, the Nazis are a step back in their economic and political development, the West flirts well
        with the nationalists and the elite of these post-Soviet republics, seeking from them to sever relations with Russia and outrageous Russophobia, in return feeding them with financial handouts and empty promises
    2. +4
      6 January 2022 13: 46
      Quote: anjey
      supported by Western and Turkish sponsors.

      You remembered correctly about Turkey, otherwise only America is sworn by everyone. The Turks did a good job there, too.
      But why is our country everywhere the last? Where is the work of our Foreign Ministry, why are they not protecting the Russian population when they are oppressed by all kinds of language patrols. After all, you can find tools to influence Kolya Saprykin.
      1. +1
        6 January 2022 14: 21
        As an internationalist, I think that this is a certain fear and fears of our government in front of Russian nationalism, they are afraid to give another reason, highlighting and defending Russians, although Russian nationalism is the most adequate, peaceful and international in essence, it historically did not divide peoples but united, how paradoxical ... And now the "Russian World" must unite all nationalities into a strong alliance of states, as opposed to the West. Not only by its military-political power, but also by its economic development.
      2. Aag
        +1
        6 January 2022 14: 56
        Quote: Third District
        Quote: anjey
        supported by Western and Turkish sponsors.

        You remembered correctly about Turkey, otherwise only America is sworn by everyone. The Turks did a good job there, too.
        But why is our country everywhere the last? Where is the work of our Foreign Ministry, why are they not protecting the Russian population when they are oppressed by all kinds of language patrols. After all, you can find tools to influence Kolya Saprykin.

        ... Kostya, Kostya Saprykina ...
        1. +1
          6 January 2022 15: 22
          Exactly, Kostya !!! The most popular among the people, the role of Stanislav Sadalsky.
  14. +1
    6 January 2022 12: 32
    Now, if only with small victims everything worked out, plus you need to work correctly in the information field, pay more attention to pogroms, looting, show the protesters in a bad light.
    But if, nevertheless, this whole storm was caused by internal problems, such as the economy, corruption, zhuzes / clans, then we will have to prepare for the fact that Russia will be to blame for the problems of Kazakhstan in the person of ordinary people, since the introduction of a peacekeeping contingent will not solve these long-standing problems ...
  15. +4
    6 January 2022 12: 34
    Well, the campaign in Kazakhstan crossed the red line and Russia finally reacted with deeds, and not just another verbiage about concern. Just in time, on the 10th, negotiations begin, to some extent, by these actions, Russia has shown that words do not differ from deeds.
    PS: Happy Nativity of Christ everyone!
  16. -2
    6 January 2022 12: 35
    Russian peacekeepers boarded unarmed with the confident gait of a landing scout.
    This is a political sign to the people of Kazakhstan --- we are flying to you in peace.
  17. +7
    6 January 2022 12: 36
    The longer the pogroms continue, the more chances that Kazakhstan will lose its statehood. Tokayev must be offered a deal: Russia gives him security guarantees in the event of a negative scenario, in response he agrees to a constitutional reform in the form of federalization of Kazakhstan. Russian regions receive autonomy and Russian as the state language. This is the price for the fact that Kazakhstan remains on the world map within these borders.
  18. +4
    6 January 2022 12: 37
    ... the operation is attended by servicemen from Russia, Belarus, Armenia, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan


    And they will say, they will say! that it was the Russians who invaded the independent republic, seized by the impulse for Freedom and Democracy. In bestial rage and an attempt to restore the Red Evil Empire. And they will squeal all over the world, and they will impose sanctions.
    And then the Kazakhs will not curse the Armenians or the Kirghiz, but us, the Russians. As the Czechs now do not curse the Bulgarians and Poles.

    I understand, now they will crush, press, strangle. So what is next? The reasons for the riot will not go anywhere. In Kazakhstan, you need to fucking break the clan system of power. Otherwise, everything will repeat itself. The current klavkazakh also came to power not in the most peaceful way ... And who will demolish?
    1. +2
      6 January 2022 13: 21
      As the Czechs now do not curse the Bulgarians and Poles.
      - so they don't curse the Germans either ...
    2. +1
      6 January 2022 15: 08
      Quote: abc_alex
      And they will say, they will say! that it was the Russians who invaded the independent republic, seized by the impulse for Freedom and Democracy.

      So the situation is almost stalemate, like in chess. Intervene, they will call the aggressor, the empire of evil. Do not interfere, there will be another hotbed of tension at your side. Considering the translucent border of a huge length and the Russian population of almost 3,5 million in Kazakhstan. It is necessary to take into account past mistakes, when they intervened only at the end to take Yanukovych's tenant for a ruble.
  19. +1
    6 January 2022 12: 40
    Quote: Gato
    What's the difference between sepukka and hara-kiri?

    There is a kaysyaku who will chop off his head in order to save him from suffering.
  20. sen
    +2
    6 January 2022 13: 00
    The CSTO Secretariat confirmed the start of the peacekeeping operation on the territory of Kazakhstan

    It is necessary to help, but what will happen next. For Kazakh nationalists, this could be a pretext for blaming Russia.
  21. -1
    6 January 2022 13: 32
    What is there to discuss? According to the CSTO agreement, upon receiving an appeal from the leadership of Kazakhstan, Russia could not do otherwise. This is recorded in the statutory documents. I honestly doubt whether the "brave" Armenians will send their servicemen, but Russia and Belarus cannot do otherwise. Although all this is possible with the absolute cowardice of the leadership of Kazakhstan and will come out sideways.
    1. -2
      6 January 2022 13: 51
      So the Armenians, like, also turned to the ODKB for help?
      1. +1
        6 January 2022 13: 56
        I would like documents for the studio))) and probably with a conflict on the territory that Armenia did not recognize either its own or sovereign))) according to your logic, if Armenia fought on the territory of Brazil, for example, then under the agreement we would have to pull ourselves up immediately ))
        1. -1
          6 January 2022 14: 13
          i.e. documents that the terrorists came from outside showed you ????))
          some hardened terrorists, don't you think? so prepare such a kipish, and no one found out about it, but is there a hand of the State Department here?))
          and the most important question - if this is an attack from the outside, then why was the resignation of the government necessary ???
          1. 0
            6 January 2022 14: 41
            there, in general, the heads of the security forces were cut off. in my opinion, only animals are capable of this ...
    2. 0
      6 January 2022 17: 16
      Armenia sent its military to Kazakhstan as part of the peacekeeping forces of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO).
      According to Sputnik Armenia, we are talking about about 70 servicemen who, as part of the contingent, have to ensure the protection of objects of strategic importance against the backdrop of mass protests in Kazakhstan.
  22. +1
    6 January 2022 13: 37
    "As stated in the CSTO secretariat, servicemen from Russia, Belarus, Armenia, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan are taking part in the operation." - ALL CSTO countries are taking part, but only Russia will be to blame! As in 1968, when the troops of the Warsaw Pact were brought into Czechoslovakia, but only the USSR was blamed!
  23. +6
    6 January 2022 13: 39

    1. -1
      7 January 2022 01: 53
      Skay (Sergey)
      Yesterday, 13: 39
      NEW
      +7...
      good laughing So it really is in unnecessary.
  24. -1
    6 January 2022 13: 55
    Quote: Palmyra
    But Yanyk's appeal did take place .. And Syria is also not a member of the ODKB ..

    Are you a provocateur or ....,?
  25. +1
    6 January 2022 15: 48
    a. those. Does the CSTO need to support the seat of dictators? clearly understood
    1. +1
      6 January 2022 19: 58
      So there they gathered a whole peculiar bouquet of countries where the same people have been in power for 30 years. Putin, Nazarbayev, Lukashenko, they signed this agreement. Three Musketeers - one for all, all for one!
  26. +1
    6 January 2022 16: 22
    Only one thing can be said for sure. Regardless of what is spelled out in the CSTO treaties, the introduction of troops will be regarded by the Kazakhs as a foreign intervention. And this will have a very bad effect on the attitude towards the Russians living in Kazakhstan.
  27. -1
    6 January 2022 16: 35
    Quote: Hiroo Onoda
    Who attacked Kazakhstan? Is there an official confirmation that we are talking about a war and some kind of enemy?

    Who attacked and how attacked the President of Kazakhstan said and in full accordance with the agreement asked his allies for help. We are talking about the war against terrorism in Kazakhstan. Let me remind you that the United States "fought against terrorism" in Afghanistan and Iraq without any invitation from the authorities of these states.
  28. 0
    6 January 2022 16: 42
    Quote: syndicalist
    Only one thing can be said for sure. Regardless of what is spelled out in the CSTO treaties, the introduction of troops will be regarded by the Kazakhs as a foreign intervention. And this will have a very bad effect on the attitude towards the Russians living in Kazakhstan.

    If anti-Russian terrorists seize power in Kazakhstan, this will have a good effect on the attitude towards Russians. How did this affect the attitude towards Russians in Ukraine?
    Or is the attitude towards Russians now worse in Syria than if Assad fell?
  29. +1
    6 January 2022 19: 48
    Well, this operation is not secret. I wanted to get the number of military personnel from other states except Russia. Or a purely Russian contingent (99%), and the rest as representatives? hi
  30. +1
    6 January 2022 21: 16
    Interestingly, the top leadership of Kazakhstan suddenly switched to the Russian language, although before that they had diligently squeezed it out of everyday communication. The rats began to fuss.
  31. 0
    6 January 2022 21: 49
    Of course, I am against the introduction of troops in general, I would not incite anti-Russian sentiments in Kazakhstan itself, but Bakonur is forcing, here without options and any BUT. I think the first thing they took under control was, I worry about my colleagues and friends who are there now.
  32. +1
    7 January 2022 00: 35
    If in Ukraine Yanukovych did not chew snot, then everything could be different. It is good that in Kazakhstan the president understood in time how not about .... the country.