Military Review

Some characteristics of the new air defense missile system "Abakan", capable of performing the tasks of both the Israeli "Iron Dome" and the American Patriot, have been named

32

The image is illustrative.



The Almaz-Antey concern has created a variant of an anti-missile system. This system was first presented abroad not so long ago - at the Dubai Airshow 2021 in the United Arab Emirates. Recall that during the same exhibition, Russia demonstrated the layout of the promising light single-engine fighter The Checkmate, which aroused considerable interest among visitors to the military-technical forum.

As the first deputy chief designer of the aforementioned concern Dmitry Khrupalo said in an interview RIA News, Almaz-Antey specialists have created a non-strategic anti-missile defense system. This complex can be brought into combat readiness in a very short period of time - less than three minutes. If we talk about the transfer to a state of combat readiness from the march, then the time will be about 15 minutes.

Some characteristics of the domestic air defense missile system 98Р6Е "Abakan" are also reported. The maximum target destruction range is 45 km, the maximum height is 25 km. It is capable of intercepting enemy ballistic missiles (non-strategic).

At the same time, an additional advantage of the Russian "Abakan" is that it is able to easily integrate into virtually any air-missile defense system, including ensuring the performance of combat missions in conjunction with other air defense systems of various ranges.

Discussing such a development as "Abakan", Russian military experts note that it is put on alert much faster than the American Patriot, with the same combat capabilities. At the same time, it can perform tasks that are inherent in such a tactical missile defense complex as the Israeli "Iron Dome". Therefore, the newest domestic air defense system can be called a universal air defense-missile defense system, which can be used to protect important facilities, including command posts, from the use of enemy strike weapons.
32 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vladimir_2U
    Vladimir_2U 15 December 2021 07: 36
    -27
    In its pure form, "there are no analogues", the "Yellow Dome" missiles are four times lighter and in the launcher there are about the same more of them. Well, incomparable systems!
    1. carstorm 11
      carstorm 11 15 December 2021 07: 54
      +10
      So it’s not complexes that compare but tasks)
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Flooding
        Flooding 15 December 2021 08: 05
        -1
        Saidpvo had photos of Abakan from the exhibition in 2020.
        1. 28st region
          28st region 15 December 2021 14: 06
          +8
          Which show great similarities with the S-350.
          The article is kind of indistinct. Calling an air defense system with a launch range of 45 km and an altitude of 25 km anti-missile is somehow strange. The main thing from the article is readiness for launch in 3 minutes after .... and then, and under what conditions?
          The main thing on which the turn-on time depends is the energy system. Provided the technician is turned off, the calculation at work places. When a command is received, the main thing that determines the turn-on time is DES. If the equipment is turned on, the calculation at the workplaces is given the command readiness to launch missiles accelerated - 1.5 minutes
          1. Flooding
            Flooding 15 December 2021 14: 08
            +5
            Quote: 28st region
            The article is kind of indistinct. Calling an air defense system with a launch range of 45 km and an altitude of 25 km anti-missile is somehow strange

            article about nothing
            it is quite obvious that the topic of Abakan, which was lit up last year, is not abandoned, that Abakan was originally created for export, and the manufacturer hopes for a foreign buyer.
            its approximate characteristics can be judged from the photographs, but definitely not from this article.
            1. 28st region
              28st region 15 December 2021 14: 10
              +5
              We took an article a year and a half ago and made a little extra money and read the exclusive material for those.
          2. Berkut752
            Berkut752 16 December 2021 15: 03
            +1
            Oh, how smart you are, young and early. And I heard about the military secret.
            1. 28st region
              28st region 17 December 2021 04: 22
              +1
              SAM is being prepared for sale. There have already been a bunch of articles on this topic, not for internal use, but for foreign use. I wrote that there is a similarity with the S-350, I was mistaken. There is no similarity. From the word at all.
              Rather, it is the modernization of the S-300/400 to the level of the S-500 for foreign buyers.
              Read what the S-500 is, its composition. This is the S-400 + anti-missile component. General CP, distribution of goals, as well as two independent systems.
            2. 28st region
              28st region 17 December 2021 04: 24
              +1
              Yes about
              Quote: Berkut752
              nimble, young and early

              Thank you, thank you very much. For a long time no one called me that.
              After almost 30 calendars, it will be somehow strange
      3. Vladimir_2U
        Vladimir_2U 15 December 2021 08: 16
        -11
        Quote: carstorm 11
        So it’s not complexes that compare but tasks)

        So here too! "ZhK" is designed to repel massive raids, and "Abakan" will not cope with such a task due to the smaller and much larger number of missiles. Well, the price of the rocket too.
        1. LZ50
          LZ50 15 December 2021 08: 21
          -6
          can be shorter - this task is not for Abakan.
          1. Vladimir_2U
            Vladimir_2U 15 December 2021 08: 28
            -16
            Quote: LZ50
            can be shorter - this task is not for Abakan.

            It can be shorter, but you need to puff your cheeks for importance! laughing
            1. LZ50
              LZ50 15 December 2021 09: 08
              0
              then you equate yourself with the buffoon who wrote the accompanying article.
              1. Nicholas C.
                Nicholas C. 15 December 2021 09: 35
                +8
                What is the purpose of the comparison with the Israeli system? What is the intent?
                Abakan is a truncated version of the C300V4, works on targets flying at a speed of 10-12M.
                The Iron Dome fights Palestinian Qassam missiles, which are clearly slower than 300m / s. (They say the Palestinians make them from water pipes.) They do not get into everything.
                1. The comment was deleted.
      4. The comment was deleted.
    2. rocket757
      rocket757 15 December 2021 08: 27
      +8
      And you determine the comparability of systems by weight?
      1. Vladimir_2U
        Vladimir_2U 15 December 2021 08: 44
        -15
        Quote: rocket757
        And you determine the comparability of systems by weight?

        And what, one of the important parameters of the rocket. And it is also important for this reason.
        Quote: Vladimir_2U
        So here too! "ZhK" is designed to repel massive raids, and "Abakan" will not cope with such a task due to the smaller and much larger number of missiles. Well, the price of the rocket too.
    3. Barberry25
      Barberry25 15 December 2021 08: 57
      -1
      and the height of the interception is up to 10 km, and then on planes and not missiles
      1. Vladimir_2U
        Vladimir_2U 15 December 2021 09: 31
        -6
        Quote: Barberry25
        and the height of the interception is up to 10 km, and then on planes and not missiles

        So "ZhK" height is not needed especially, it is more important for it to intercept many targets, albeit simple ones. "Abakan" will not be able to take out this multitude simply because of the smaller number of missiles. Therefore, the comparison in the article is meaningless - from the category "does not have an id."
        1. 28st region
          28st region 15 December 2021 14: 41
          +2
          If you don’t think about it, then ah ah, what an Iron Dome he is. Wets everything. Let's take a look at his action
          The main task of the ZhK is to repel the strike of short-range unguided missiles - a threat characteristic of Israel. Rockets in 99.99999999999 cases out of 100 samopal. They can find something manufactured and that such as a Grad projectile. What speed can such missiles have? If in relation to the Grad projectiles, then no higher than 715 m / s, i.e. somewhere around 2500 km / h.
          Of course, the conditions are not greenhouse, they are not told the time of the strikes, but it would be too much to call this missile defense system.
          Conventional air defense, shooting at targets that do not maneuver, flying evenly and in a straight line. Most of these Domes are stationary batteries oriented in the direction of a possible impact. Which practically does not change. What is good about this air defense system is its speed. and a huge stock of missiles in the launcher
          1. Vladimir_2U
            Vladimir_2U 15 December 2021 16: 12
            +1
            Quote: 28st region
            If you don’t think about it, then ah ah, what an Iron Dome he is. Wets everything. Let's take a look at his action
            Where did you ah ah see? laughing
            Quote: 28st region
            What is good about this air defense system is its speed. and a huge stock of missiles in the launcher

            Actually, I am writing about this.

            Quote: Vladimir_2U
            So "ZhK" height is not needed especially, it is more important for him to intercept many goals, albeit simple.


            "Abakan", as I understand it, will quite calmly intercept any target of "ZhK", but on the contrary, no longer exists. But “Abakan” will simply run out of stock when “ZhK” will still shoot. And that's why I find it rather silly to compare these two complexes.
            1. poquello
              poquello 15 December 2021 21: 07
              0
              Quote: Vladimir_2U
              "Abakan", as I understand it, will quite calmly intercept any target of "ZhK", but on the contrary, no longer exists. But “Abakan” will simply run out of stock when “ZhK” will still shoot. And that's why I find it rather silly to compare these two complexes.

              I did not understand, but put 4pu next to it - it will be possible to compare?
              1. Vladimir_2U
                Vladimir_2U 16 December 2021 03: 28
                -2
                Quote: poquello
                I did not understand, but put 4pu next to it - it will be possible to compare?

                Well, compare, 1 launcher "Abakan" 4 missiles, max. 6, and 1 PU "ZhK" - 16 missiles. Multiply six by four, and then multiply sixteen by four and compare the result.
                1. 28st region
                  28st region 16 December 2021 05: 46
                  +1
                  Absolutely different air defense systems. At least compare the launch weight of the rocket.
                  1. Vladimir_2U
                    Vladimir_2U 16 December 2021 06: 51
                    -1
                    Quote: 28st region
                    Absolutely different air defense systems. At least compare the launch weight of the rocket.

                    I have it in almost every comment.
                    1. 28st region
                      28st region 16 December 2021 06: 52
                      +2
                      To be honest, I still did not understand who and why began to compare with LCD.
                2. poquello
                  poquello 16 December 2021 17: 47
                  -1
                  Quote: Vladimir_2U
                  Quote: poquello
                  I did not understand, but put 4pu next to it - it will be possible to compare?

                  Well, compare, 1 launcher "Abakan" 4 missiles, max. 6, and 1 PU "ZhK" - 16 missiles. Multiply six by four, and then multiply sixteen by four and compare the result.

                  at 24, but you don't need to multiply by 16, and that - now kumpol
                  Quote: Vladimir_2U
                  many will not take out simply because of the fewer missiles.

                  Kindergarten
            2. 28st region
              28st region 16 December 2021 05: 44
              +1
              It is impossible to compare them, if only for the reason that there is no Abakan as such. made one show sample and that's it. How things really are and what characteristics this complex has is not clear.
              Basically everything revolves around
              "The time of readiness of the Abakan air defense missile system for combat work from the deployed state takes less than three minutes, from the march - 15 minutes"
              This is how any modern complex unfolds like that. The firing range is 45 km.
              designed to defeat modern and advanced non-strategic ballistic missiles in the defense of important military-industrial facilities, as well as government and administrative buildings.
              With such a zone of destruction of 25 km altitude and 45 km range, this is nothing.
              There is one BUT. They write that this complex is not for domestic consumption, the complex for foreign buyers can be included in the S-300, S-400 systems. Those. it turns out a kind of S-500 for sale.




        2. Krasnoyarsk
          Krasnoyarsk 16 December 2021 10: 18
          0
          Quote: Vladimir_2U
          "Abakan" will not take out this multitude simply because of the smaller number of missiles

          And if the object is guarded by two "Abakan" s, i.e. twice as many rockets, will that calm you down?
          1. Vladimir_2U
            Vladimir_2U 16 December 2021 15: 28
            0
            Quote: Krasnoyarsk
            And if the object is guarded by two "Abakan" s, i.e. twice as many rockets, will that calm you down?

            Dear colleague, two "Abakan" launchers are a maximum of 12 missiles, while two "ZhK" launchers are 32 missiles.
            Note, I do not write that "Abakan" is bad for this reason, I write that it is incomparable with "ZhK" in terms of class and tasks. And "there are no analogues .." to which many got angry, this claim is not to the air defense system, but to the article!
    4. Cron
      Cron 15 December 2021 09: 22
      +2
      In its pure form, "there are no analogues", the "Yellow Dome" missiles are four times lighter and in the launcher there are about the same more of them. Well, incomparable systems!

      In its purest form, it is "just to shit". Well, the weight of the rocket may be due to something. Have you tried to get your head out of one place at least sometimes?

      Something this resource has really started to slide, both in terms of the content of the materials, and in terms of the level of discussion in the comments.
      1. Vladimir_2U
        Vladimir_2U 15 December 2021 09: 36
        -4
        Quote: Cron
        In its purest form, it is "just to shit". Well, the weight of the rocket may be due to something. Have you tried to get your head out of one place at least sometimes?

        You do not even try to do something like that with your head, so it is with you and remains in the "darkness of the negro."
        The article compares completely different air defense missile systems / missile defense systems with different tasks and, accordingly, different weights and sizes of missiles, and it is the article from the category of "does not have ...". and not "Abakan" as such.
        It seems to you just to gurgle something indignant.
        1. Cron
          Cron 15 December 2021 09: 51
          -1
          Quote: Vladimir_2U
          You do not even try to do something like that with your head, so it is with you and remains in the "darkness of the negro."

          At least you do not deny that it really arrives there.
          The article compares completely different air defense missile systems / missile defense systems with different tasks and, accordingly, different weights and sizes of missiles, and it is the article from the category of "does not have ...". and not "Abakan" as such.

          So I wrote about the level of content of the materials.
          It seems to you just to gurgle something indignant.

          Only you gurgle with your "no analogues", puffing up your cheeks, etc.
          1. Vladimir_2U
            Vladimir_2U 15 December 2021 10: 02
            -6
            Quote: Cron
            So I wrote about the level of content of the materials.

            Not that you haven't read the article, you don't remember your own scribbles.

            Quote: Cron
            In its purest form, it is "just to shit". Well, the weight of the rocket may be due to something. Have you tried to get your head out of one place at least sometimes?
            In the article there is NOTHING about the weight of missiles, there are absolutely different possibilities, so you gurgled exactly at my comment, not understanding what it was about.


            Quote: Cron
            Something this resource has really started to slide, both in terms of the content of the materials, and in terms of the level of discussion in the comments.
            For which you and people like you "thank you very much."
            1. Cron
              Cron 15 December 2021 10: 18
              -2
              Quote: Vladimir_2U
              Not that you haven't read the article, you don't remember your own scribbles.

              I read the article, I remember the scribbles. So go by
              In the article there is NOTHING about the weight of missiles, there are absolutely different possibilities, so you gurgled exactly at my comment, not understanding what it was about.

              Who can argue with that? I repeat once again that I indicated the level of content of the material.
              So we would share additional information. And they concluded that these systems are designed for completely different tasks, and the article is extremely weak and uninformative. Instead, they started screeching about "no analogues" and puffing out their cheeks.
              For which you and people like you "thank you very much."

              Of course, thank you. Only without quotes.
              1. Vladimir_2U
                Vladimir_2U 15 December 2021 11: 15
                -4
                Quote: Cron
                Of course, thank you. Only without quotes.

                For all your flood or what?
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. The comment was deleted.
  2. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  3. d ^ Amir
    d ^ Amir 15 December 2021 08: 02
    -2
    TOP digitized ???
    1. LZ50
      LZ50 15 December 2021 08: 20
      +2
      and what does Thor have to do with it? if Abakan is integrated with the SD / DB air defense system
    2. rocket757
      rocket757 15 December 2021 08: 36
      +2
      Are there any analog air defense systems being produced now? WHERE?
  4. Hog
    Hog 15 December 2021 08: 29
    +2
    Export version of the S-500 ???

    1. rocket757
      rocket757 15 December 2021 08: 38
      +7
      This is not a tactical level complex ... well, not at all.
      1. Vladimir_2U
        Vladimir_2U 15 December 2021 09: 03
        +2
        Quote: rocket757
        This is not a tactical level complex ... well, not at all.
        Well, you wonder why I found fault with the weight and size of the rocket.
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 15 December 2021 09: 31
          +4
          It is clear now ... the reaction to the HEADER, an attempt to compare with the cumpol, and even with the Patriot, suggested that we are talking about systems of a different "caliber" that are shown in the photo ...
          1. Vladimir_2U
            Vladimir_2U 15 December 2021 09: 45
            +1
            Quote: rocket757
            It is clear now

            Sometimes I write a little tricky, I can't express my thought from the first comment, I'm to blame! recourse
      2. Nikolaevich I
        Nikolaevich I 15 December 2021 09: 14
        +3
        Quote: rocket757
        This is not a tactical level complex ... well, not at all.

        Of course ... "Abakan" is intended to intercept FROM ... hypersonic targets ...
        but not NURS like "grad", "hurricane" ... "kasams"!
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 15 December 2021 09: 34
          +2
          I see ... I noticed something earlier or didn't pay attention.
          We have systems that are different, there are many and a novelty that has not been adopted for service with our air defense systems, it can slip past attention.
    2. Nikolaevich I
      Nikolaevich I 15 December 2021 08: 46
      +4
      Quote: Hog
      Export version of the S-500 ???

      No way! soldier This is an export anti-missile version of the S-300V4 air defense system!
      1. just exp
        just exp 15 December 2021 09: 00
        0
        on wheels?
        1. Jacket in stock
          Jacket in stock 15 December 2021 09: 11
          +1
          Quote: just explo
          on wheels?

          It is more comfortable.
        2. Nikolaevich I
          Nikolaevich I 15 December 2021 09: 17
          +2
          Quote: just explo
          on wheels?

          Oh yes! yes
    3. LZ50
      LZ50 15 December 2021 10: 21
      +2
      no. not 500ki, an export component of missile defense for the not rich. Buy air defense systems Viking and Abakan, get inexpensive air defense missile defense.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. Servisinzhener
    Servisinzhener 15 December 2021 13: 00
    +1
    I really thought that they finally completed the Morpheus air defense system. But no, just an article was written by a level 80 journalist.
  7. Vitas
    Vitas 15 December 2021 13: 55
    +3
    Some characteristics of the new air defense missile system "Abakan", capable of performing the tasks of both the Israeli "Iron Dome" and the American Patriot, have been named

  8. Alexfly
    Alexfly 15 December 2021 17: 41
    -2
    Would show on your fingers the achievements of ABAKANA (a bad name associated with a forgotten competition for an assault rifle)! The Iron Dome plows efficiently, but I cannot know Abakan ..
  9. Vissarion Golubov
    Vissarion Golubov 17 December 2021 10: 42
    0
    Not in the subject. Increasing the survivability of the shell battery. Upon arrival at the position, it is necessary to be able to install the launcher on light carriages, outside the car, with a spacing of about 30-50 meters. If the machine itself fails, the control of the PU-mi is transferred to another battery machine. Try, pick up, PU one by one. Can be well disguised ... Maneuverability is lost. But the resistance against the swarm is increasing