"Made three turns and anti-aircraft maneuver": the new European anti-ship missile Marte ER hit the target during tests

93

The new anti-ship missile Marte ER, developed by the European company MBDA, has successfully completed its last test launch from a test site in Sardinia.

This launch is fundamental to validating the system. He showed a very high level of performance and overall product reliability.

- the manufacturer said on December 14, indicating that testing differed from the standard combat use by the equipment of the rocket with an inert warhead.



As explained, using its software to complete the mission, the rocket made a long-range flight, making three turns and a climb and descent maneuver on the last turn. Then she went on a straight path to the target detection point.

Identification, selection and tracking of the target took place in an extremely short time, and immediately after that, guidance began

- explains the developer.

During the final phase of the flight, the rocket successfully performed an anti-aircraft maneuver, hitting the target just above the waterline at transonic speed.

This confirmed the exceptional performance of the Marte ER control module with its new solid-state RF finder. Tests have also shown that the Marte ER turbojet engine performs excellently both in the ignition phase and at the thrust level.

- noted in the MBDA, indicating that this check was the last stage in the development of the RCC Marte ER, which will be put into operation at the beginning of next year.

93 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    14 December 2021 19: 51
    It's tempting. IAI has a lot to learn.
    1. +12
      14 December 2021 20: 00
      It's tempting. IAI has a lot to learn.

      Recently, foaming at the mouth, they argued whether the Tomahawk could make an anti-ship missile. They say the American ships have nothing to shoot at other ships. It turns out that there is no need to argue, everything was already invented before us .. Without the "hypersounds" they sent a racket - "Fly to the district, they sort of spotted something there. Sort it out yourself."
      It would be interesting to know if these creatures are also able to search and attack in a flock?
      1. +5
        15 December 2021 00: 50
        so what to build there, change your "head", here you go
    2. +4
      14 December 2021 20: 04
      What? The Balts have chosen the Israeli anti-ship missile system. smile
    3. -9
      14 December 2021 20: 05
      Quote: Aaron Zawi
      It's tempting. IAI has a lot to learn.

      So learn, ensign to you in both pictures! hi
    4. 0
      14 December 2021 20: 09
      Quote: Aaron Zawi
      It's tempting. IAI has a lot to learn.

      damn it, can you tell me what, otherwise I can't get rid of the impression that this sucks
      1. +2
        14 December 2021 20: 53
        Quote: poquello
        Quote: Aaron Zawi
        It's tempting. IAI has a lot to learn.

        damn it, can you tell me what, otherwise I can't get rid of the impression that this sucks

        Because in your concept, the rate is on size and speed, and in the western one on accuracy and maneuver.
        1. +17
          14 December 2021 21: 16
          1. We do not have a bet on "size"
          They always try to dry the size. But since speed cannot be trampled against nature
          2 and in western the rate is on quantity and range.
          No one has such a number of cr (it does not matter if it is or cr), like the United States and NATO. Any criticism quite easily turns into a pkr: there would be ships of the enemy.
          No ships: cr is easier to screw up
          enemy territory
          1. +5
            14 December 2021 21: 29
            Indeed, there is no "bet on size", it's just that in Europe it weighs one hundred grams - in its native version, half a kilo, hence the size
            1. +6
              15 December 2021 02: 10
              And this. But the domestic anti-ship missiles were intended either for aircraft carrier groups or large naval ships.
        2. +8
          14 December 2021 21: 16
          Quote: Aaron Zawi
          Quote: poquello
          Quote: Aaron Zawi
          It's tempting. IAI has a lot to learn.

          damn it, can you tell me what, otherwise I can't get rid of the impression that this sucks

          Because in your concept, the rate is on size and speed, and in the western one on accuracy and maneuver.

          With what range of defeat? "The Marte ER rocket is deeply upgraded from its previous generation family, the solid propellant rocket engine has been replaced by a Williams WJ-24-8G WR turbojet, increasing the range from 25 to over 100 kilometers (62 miles)." And what about the speed? Is the hipper sound resting? fool
          1. -4
            15 December 2021 00: 37
            remember Topvar's basic axiom: Russian means bad, Western means better ... they can't do otherwise) laughing
        3. +4
          14 December 2021 21: 23
          Quote: Aaron Zawi
          Quote: poquello
          Quote: Aaron Zawi
          It's tempting. IAI has a lot to learn.

          damn it, can you tell me what, otherwise I can't get rid of the impression that this sucks

          Because in your concept, the rate is on size and speed, and in the western one on accuracy and maneuver.

          well, without "our concept", how is this different from x35 uranium to learn from? )
          1. KCA
            -3
            15 December 2021 05: 46
            Apparently, remnants of the Soviet perestroika past - Western means the best
            1. -1
              15 December 2021 19: 09
              Quote: KCA
              Apparently remnants perestroika Soviet of the past - western means the best

              it was even during the monarchies that there were such Westernizers, but 6 minuses and more than one answer
        4. +7
          14 December 2021 21: 24
          Maybe it's not just the concept, but not the ability to solve (yet) the concept with speed? After all, someday they will create speed, then tell me that the concept is different?
          1. -1
            14 December 2021 21: 46
            Quote: vitvit123
            Maybe it's not just the concept, but not the ability to solve (yet) the concept with speed? After all, someday they will create speed, then tell me that the concept is different?

            Possible.
        5. -4
          15 December 2021 03: 33
          Quote: Aron Zaavi
          Because in your concept, the rate is on size and speed, and in the western one on accuracy and maneuver.
          This means that domestic anti-ship missiles are hitting areas or what ?! Well, the anti-aircraft maneuver of a missile with such controls looks unconvincing.
        6. 0
          16 December 2021 20: 18
          Quote: Aron Zaavi
          Because in your concept, the rate is on size and speed, and in the western one on accuracy and maneuver.
          I'm embarrassed to ask, but doesn't the size depend on the purpose? If the anti-ship missile system is high-precision, maneuvering, small, which makes it difficult to detect, but flies 50 km, will it be in demand?
      2. -5
        14 December 2021 21: 03
        "damn it, can you tell me why, otherwise I can't get rid of the impression that this sucks"

        Against the background of Zircon, yes, but against the background of Uranus - quite itself.
        1. +12
          14 December 2021 21: 21
          And how many zircons have already been loaded into the UKSK?
          Let me remind you: the powerful USSR IN 1989 PRODUCED <100 GRANATES a year.
          And 3K10 at the cost of a child, in comparison with zircon, however, like Russia in comparison with the USSR.
          And this "slag" is riveted a lot and cheaply.
          And each NATO junk can have several
          And they probably have an order of magnitude more such cake than ours.
          Smart will make conclusions, turn on 60 minutes and relax
          1. 0
            14 December 2021 21: 39
            Quote: ja-ja-vw
            And this "slag" is riveted a lot and cheaply.
            And each NATO junk can have several

            yeah, but we don't have this slag at all))))))))))))))) ))
            1. +3
              14 December 2021 23: 10
              Don't get excited - just the amount of ammunition LOOK recourse and immediately dive into nirvana.
              And if you pay attention to the number of pelvis carriers: you will believe in the coming of Christ today.
              Really.
              1. +1
                14 December 2021 23: 31
                how, hereto
                Quote: ja-ja-vw
                Don't get excited - just the amount of ammunition LOOK

                Is it connected with the voice?
                Quote: ja-ja-vw
                And this "slag" is riveted a lot and cheaply.

                despite the fact that the x-35 is in service with 18, 18 Karl !, years
                1. 0
                  14 December 2021 23: 41
                  Charles....
                  1.Did you confuse the "summer in service / operation" with the number of pieces (ammunition)?
                  I understand the evening (alcohol) but the summer of weapons and ammunition how CORRELATED?
                  Easier to compare the classic "soft with warm" - you can save on a snack!
                  2. In general, I farted about the CD, and not about the X-35, which the CD and anti-ship missiles.
                  / no offense: cheerful mood> snow covered, another hour to clean, and to sleep hotts and vodka to eat.
                  DISTRACT FROM THE SHOVEL
                  1. -1
                    14 December 2021 23: 45
                    Quote: ja-ja-vw
                    In general, I farted about KR

                    and de you pro .. fart? ))))
                    it is unlikely that psychics are sitting here to understand what fads come to your head
                    1. +2
                      14 December 2021 23: 59
                      Quote: poquello
                      and de you pro .. fart? ))))

                      Quote: mulberry I farted
                      And 3K10 at the cost of a child, in comparison with zircon, however, like Russia in comparison with the USSR.
                      And this "slag" is riveted a lot and cheaply.
                      And each NATO junk can have several
                      And they probably have an order of magnitude more such cake than ours.

                      Something like this. The grenade is not an anti-ship missile, but a CD, although there is no difference.
                      We look at the number of harpoons and Granites and the like
                      I will hint thickly at the brain
                      having musk in his pocket does not shout about it on the streets, because the smell of musk betrays itself ...

                      Sorry, I'll go clean the snow and chop wood
                      1. -2
                        15 December 2021 00: 12
                        Quote: ja-ja-vw
                        Something like that.

                        like how, what kind of "slag"?
                      2. +2
                        15 December 2021 01: 54
                        Without slag, cast iron cannot be smelted request
                      3. KCA
                        -1
                        15 December 2021 05: 53
                        Study the nomenclature line of "Calibers", the difference from the "Grenade" is only that the "Grenade" was sharpened exclusively for SBS, "Caliber" and conventional, and SBS. Compare "Granite" and "Harpoon" as a cannon with a small-bore pistol
                      4. 0
                        15 December 2021 19: 18
                        Quote: KCA
                        Compare "Granite" and "Harpoon" as a cannon with a small-bore pistol

                        but I did not understand at all how his grenades fell))))))), and most importantly with feeling, with arrangement, with a claim)
                      5. +3
                        15 December 2021 06: 47
                        Have you read the article at all?
                        what is going on in your head that you are comparing Garnet and Uranus? or a Tomahawk and a Harpoon?
            2. +6
              15 December 2021 01: 51
              Mistake
              We look at AVAILABILITY (carrier ammunition)
              And it is foolish to say that 2% of the world's GDP can be riveted MORE than the other 80%
              Zombie will believe, reasonable NO.
              And it's unfortunate (to me)
              1. +1
                15 December 2021 19: 23
                Quote: ja-ja-vw
                And it is foolish to say that 2% of the world's GDP can be riveted MORE than the other 80%

                it's like who you see with a Kalash, come straight and explain about 2%
          2. -7
            14 December 2021 22: 24
            All these subsonic anti-ship missiles are already the day before yesterday and the X 35 is the same. Unfortunately, it needs a hypersonic light class to replace it.
            1. +1
              14 December 2021 23: 12
              God forbid our calf and catch the wolf

              I have a strong feeling that 237 never parted with the pioneer tie.
              Such nonsense porn is often, I really want to force the IVL procedure to try
              / no offense
              1. -2
                15 December 2021 12: 14
                Nonsense here, such as you porish, and constantly go better your "cabin", check it out, it's clearly crumpled.
          3. -2
            15 December 2021 00: 39
            funny .. Zircons are finishing tests, infrastructure is being built, a contract has been signed for the supply of Zircons already in 2022 .. But no "they are not there and will not be, but these are ... in the sense that they are not there either, but" they will be riveted ".. Though piss in the eye
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. -3
                15 December 2021 08: 58
                hmm, so apparently you don't know how to read
              2. +1
                16 December 2021 14: 26
                Actually, Khrushchev achieved what he wanted. Ours removed missiles from Cuba, the Americans from Turkey.
                And why did he crap if they came to parity? History should be known better.
                1. 0
                  16 December 2021 19: 13
                  History should be known better.

                  History is Ukrainian pseudoscience. You don't need to know IT, you have to invent it every day.
                  1. 0
                    17 December 2021 05: 33
                    There is a history according to the statements of politicians and there is a history according to documents in archives and descriptions of the participants in those events. I stick with the second.
                    Well, also, do not take their word for it, but check and compare the facts (if possible) from all sources.
          4. 0
            15 December 2021 06: 46
            Do you really think that only Western ships have such missiles?
            Do you know what the X-35 and Uranus are?
            Do you know the year of their release?
        2. 0
          14 December 2021 21: 27
          Quote: lucul
          "but against the background of Uranus - quite to itself.

          quite yourself better? how? )
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. +1
      14 December 2021 21: 12
      Why are you not enough of your own (pkr)?
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. +1
      14 December 2021 21: 59
      Hi Aaron! There is nothing to learn there, but rather Delilah, in the old modification!
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +11
    14 December 2021 19: 54
    It is curious that the developers of the new anti-ship missile system are not chasing not only hypersound, but even supersonic ones.
    1. +2
      14 December 2021 20: 03
      Quote: military_cat
      do not chase not only hypersonic, but even supersonic.

      Not for Senka hat.
    2. +8
      14 December 2021 20: 14
      So this is a different class. They will be carried by all possible carriers, from patrol boats and helicopters, to the Italian version of the Yak-130, 2 of which. And Eurofighter generally carries 6 pieces - that is, he will completely drown the corvette with air defense in one salvo, simply overloading its reflection capabilities.



      1. -5
        14 December 2021 20: 16
        Quote: donavi49
        And Eurofighter generally carries 6 pieces - that is, he will completely drown the corvette with air defense in one salvo, simply overloading its reflection capabilities.

        yeah, with their speed, art will stupidly shoot them
      2. PN
        +9
        14 December 2021 20: 44
        Drowning is unlikely to drown, the relics of the warhead will not be enough. But it can cause certain damage ...
      3. +1
        14 December 2021 20: 51
        And the Rafale?
      4. -3
        14 December 2021 20: 57
        Quote: donavi49
        So this is a different class. They will be carried by all possible carriers, from patrol boats and helicopters, to the Italian version of the Yak-130, 2 of which. And Eurofighter generally carries 6 pieces - that is, he will completely drown the corvette with air defense in one salvo, simply overloading its reflection capabilities.





      5. -5
        14 December 2021 21: 01
        "So this is a different class. They will be carried by all possible carriers, from patrol boats and helicopters, to the Italian version of the Yak-130."

        So we put Caliber on everything that floats.)))
      6. -1
        15 December 2021 06: 49
        Air defense of corvettes and frigates since the times of the USSR is built on the basis of repelling the attack of 8 subsonic anti-ship missiles
    3. +5
      14 December 2021 20: 31
      Quote: military_cat
      It is curious that the developers of the new anti-ship missile system are not chasing not only hypersound, but even supersonic ones.

      Who is the mare's bride! bully
    4. +5
      14 December 2021 21: 44
      They just don't believe in

      / pragmatists - mathematicians, what to take from them
  4. +3
    14 December 2021 20: 17
    [/ quote] During the final phase of the flight, the rocket successfully completed the anti-aircraft maneuver [quote]
    I also do pretty good anti-DPS maneuvers when there are no DPS soldiers! laughing
    1. +6
      14 December 2021 21: 50
      And you read the test report, there in detail WHAT DPS were on the line of attack
  5. +2
    14 December 2021 20: 21
    It can be this way, it can be that way ... but exactly how it will be, no one knows in advance.
    1. +1
      14 December 2021 21: 51
      Philosopher good
      I'll put you +, otherwise it's already - I slapped it
      1. +2
        14 December 2021 22: 12
        That the philosopher, that the fortune-teller ... earn "language", "hanging noodles" to gullible individuals.
        I will be satisfied with the definition, "couch chatterbox" or "old chatterbox" ... not for self-interest, out of love for ... a sofa, chatting.
        1. -3
          14 December 2021 23: 07
          Maybe I’m poorly understood, or I’m poorly understood request
          I am without "undermining": the philosopher wrote.
          Kafka?
          You rarely meet on in, except:
          "Approved" and "yes, we will shower them with hats"
          Everyone in the world is already shouting at the protectionism of the administration.
          Censor. Not in the Russian manner.
          1. +3
            14 December 2021 23: 44
            Even "sitting on the couch", squeezing the texts into a "chatterbox" (as I call it) does not interfere with thinking either, both over the way of expressing one's thoughts, and over the meaning of what has been written in general. If there is also knowledge / remained from the old days, the text will have meaning and a rational grain ...
            Patriotism is not a hindrance to business, but a biased, dismissive attitude towards an opponent, as a rule, causes a negative counter reaction.
            It is impossible to avoid unconstructive criticism, or even outright rudeness, but these are the costs of this type of "open" communication ...
            And so, an ordinary open "chatterbox" ... with its own rules and participants, different levels of thinking and with their own preferences.
            Nothing unusual.
            PS philosopher, analyst, political scientist and everything else like that ... no, no, I don't like it, especially when it does not correspond to its essence.
            1. 0
              14 December 2021 23: 55
              Well genosse and I are about the same.
              About myself: I confess, I sprinkle ash on my bald head.
              Rude, not abstinent, etc., etc.
              I did not receive a characterization like that of Stirlitz.
              I’m generally for: say what you think / think, argue.
              Truth is born from entogo.
              It is possible from the "couch", but with good reason.
              But, as we have now: this is a dead end.
              Recalled
               Out of the Dead End (set of 2 books) | Pikul Valentin Savvi

              Reality reminded me strongly
              1. 0
                15 December 2021 00: 08
                By hearing / seeing how bullets whistle and carry people into molecules, usually begins to think about the frailty of life ...
                Not all at once, but the majority comes to precisely this understanding.
                Better to say than ... to do something when everything disappears irrevocably. At least while there is such an opportunity ...
                I am not calling for Christian humility, but something worth thinking about before ...
                1. -2
                  15 December 2021 00: 47
                  And I saw human mince, and did not react until 49.
                  Now brr.
                  I watch youtruber, current, and go nuts: as if
                  tetraethyl lead is not into gasoline, but directly into the brain.
                  Everything is empty ...
  6. +9
    14 December 2021 21: 01
    Well, our "outdated" "Granites", as domestic articles assure, are also capable of carrying out anti-aircraft maneuvers, as well as "working in a flock", exchanging information in flight ... they have radio interference transmitters, devices for throwing false targets ... ", in addition to all of the above, should have been equipped with an active laser seeker ... And now compare ... when the anti-ship missiles" Granit "," Volcano "entered service and when the" overseas "Marté ER managed to hit the target after the anti-aircraft maneuver! Oh, if our designers were financed in about the same way as in the 70s of the last century, then what kind of "wunderwales" there would be in all types and types of the Russian Armed Forces!
    1. -5
      14 December 2021 21: 34
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      Well, our "obsolete" Granites

      except that granites and volcanoes do not fly in helicopters, but they do not have volcanoes, in any way
      1. +4
        14 December 2021 22: 25
        Quote: poquello
        but they have no volcanoes, no way

        And Russia has Onyxes ... When Onyxes “went into production,” the descriptions of these weapons mentioned that, according to the guidance algorithm, these anti-ship missiles can be called the successors of anti-ship missiles, for example, the P-700, P-1000 .. .And the "analogue" of "Onyx" is "BrahMos" ... And "BrahMos" flies (!) ... while on airplanes, but if you really want to, then we will adapt to a helicopter, for example, the Mi-26 ...
        1. -2
          14 December 2021 22: 45
          Quote: Nikolaevich I
          And "BrahMos" flies (!) ... while on airplanes, but if you really want to, then we will adapt to a helicopter, for example, the Mi-26 ...

          helicopter - Uranus, about the same as the crap in the article, does it really hit farther
    2. +3
      15 December 2021 02: 07
      They assure ...
      But no one saw this and not a single adversary was amazed.
      They say that chickens are milked
      1. 0
        15 December 2021 08: 39
        Quote: ja-ja-vw
        They assure ...
        But no one saw this and not a single adversary was amazed.

        But I have already heard that ... "The whole company is out of step ... and only Lieutenant Rzhevsky is in step!"
      2. +2
        15 December 2021 11: 13
        They assure you correctly (I'm talking about "Granites"), p.ch. I saw active interference with my own eyes in the 80s, I got acquainted with the flight profile every second, and the Moremans say that that barge (consider the adversary) sometimes has nothing to sew, although there is no CD without warheads. These CDs were also launched under the Fiord program. For now, rejoice that the adversary is not real.
  7. -3
    14 December 2021 23: 56
    Yes-ah-ah-ah, the 21st century is in the yard ... and the Europeans are still developing subsonic anti-ship missiles and are happy. On subsonic sound you even do a back somersault ... it's still subsonic ... and the interception is very large.
    1. -2
      15 December 2021 00: 16
      Quote: Skipper
      Yes-ah-ah-ah, the 21st century is in the yard ... and the Europeans are still developing subsonic anti-ship missiles and are happy. On subsonic sound you even do a back somersault ... it's still subsonic ... and the interception is very large.

      trite up to 1000m / s shells for a snack
      1. +2
        15 December 2021 02: 10
        Are there many of those "shells" on the ships of the Russian Navy?
        Lease fingers, what to count (otherwise I'm afraid on the arms, legs + a scion, a total of 21 is not enough)?
        ASM: Anti-ship missile - a missile designed to destroy surface targets (ships).
        fool
        Zy.Pantsiri and 400 km / hour baikartars did not really digest
        1. 0
          15 December 2021 19: 13
          Quote: ja-ja-vw
          Are there many of those "shells" on the ships of the Russian Navy?

          appear
          Quote: ja-ja-vw
          ASM: Anti-ship missile - a missile designed to destroy surface targets (ships).

          Have you drunk vodka, do you have a headache?
          Quote: ja-ja-vw
          Zy.Pantsiri and 400 km / hour baikartars did not really digest

          that is, you are not boom boom in this matter, or are deliberately spreading Turkish chatter
  8. -1
    15 December 2021 00: 47
    poured harpoon
    1. +3
      15 December 2021 02: 24
      AGM / RGM / UGM-84 "The harpoon has a mass of 670-770 kg

      MARTE ER - has a mass of 315 kg

      MM40 Exoset
      block3 has a mass of 690 kg.
      Conclusions are made by everyone
      1. +3
        15 December 2021 02: 50
        Very quickly to the topvar!
        By weight and dimensions X-25
        By functionality / range
        X-38, but ours is bigger (with except copied)
        Length: 4,2 m
        Diameter: 0,31 m
        Launch weight: 520kg
        Warhead weight: 250 kg
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. 0
        15 December 2021 14: 44
        Harpoon, Kzoset, Uranus are the same in every sense, the TTX difference is not great, only the X35 is a little more oval, and the Harpoon with Kzoset is even the same coloring
  9. -2
    15 December 2021 02: 47
    The rocket of the Bal complex behaves in the same way. They can, by maneuvering, approach the target from any direction, and not wind circles to simplify their detection. Again, the French one searches for a target after it has been brought to a given area at low altitudes, where it makes a jump for an independent search, allowing itself to be detected. Another improved French anti-ship missile.
    1. +2
      15 December 2021 02: 56
      Ball "" - with "any" can not. There won't be enough energy.
      And others cannot, for the same reason.
      In terms of mass and size characteristics, it is X-25, in terms of efficiency / range, it is X-38
      1. -1
        15 December 2021 22: 28
        Quote: ja-ja-vw
        Ball "" - with "any" can not. There won't be enough energy.

        ball is a complex with x35 or something else will charge
        Quote: ja-ja-vw
        And others cannot, for the same reason.
        In terms of mass and size characteristics, it is X-25, in terms of efficiency / range, it is X-38

        "judging by the ears and balls"
  10. kig
    +3
    15 December 2021 04: 23
    At least they show not only the start, but also hitting the target.
    1. 0
      15 December 2021 12: 19
      All anti-ship missiles that we have in service showed the same hits - but there is no Zircon hit since the type of missile is classified.
      1. -2
        15 December 2021 19: 49
        it is easy to explain - it seems that zircon will not go for sale.
  11. sen
    +3
    15 December 2021 14: 41
    "Made three turns and anti-aircraft maneuver": the new European anti-ship missile Marte ER hit the target during tests

    The Marte ER is the third generation of the Marte rocket systems. It can carry out a long flight at an ultra-low altitude (less than two meters) above the sea. Powered by Williams WJ-24-8G WR turbojet engine. Warhead of the order of 120 kilograms. The rocket, with a launch weight of 315 kilograms, is half the size of other variants such as the Harpoon and RBS-15, while still having the same maximum range. The Eurofighter Typhoon fighter can carry up to six Marte-ERPs instead of two or three larger missiles.
    https://vpk-news.ru/articles/60162