Antey, which is waiting for modernization at the Far East Zvezda, will receive the Zircon hypersonic missiles

Nuclear submarine K-442 "Chelyabinsk" of project 949A "Antey" will receive new weapons, the submarine will be modernized at the Far East plant "Zvezda".

The Chelyabinsk nuclear submarine will be rearmed from the Granit anti-ship missiles to the more modern Onyx and hypersonic Zircon missiles. Work on the modernization of the submarine will begin next year immediately after the completion of modernization work on the same type of nuclear submarine "Irkutsk". This information was provided by a source in the Russian defense industry, although with one caveat - these are preliminary plans and they depend on the timing of the completion of work at Irkutsk.

(...) "Chelyabinsk" will be equipped with universal launchers for launching missiles "Onyx" and "Zircon", its combat potential will increase many times

- cites the words of the source RIA News.

At present, the Chelyabinsk nuclear submarine is at the Zvezda Far East shipyard awaiting an active phase of repair and modernization. The submarine was sent for repairs back in 2014, but the lack of funding has pushed the timeline for modernization. Later, the Ministry of Defense reported that the nuclear submarines "Irkutsk" and "Chelyabinsk" will be upgraded to the level of Project 949AM, and will receive new weapons during the repair.

The nuclear submarine of project 949A Antey K-442 was laid down at Sevmash on May 21, 1987, launched on June 18, 1990, became part of the Northern fleet March 14, 1991, September 24, 1991 transferred to the Pacific Fleet. It got the name "Chelyabinsk" in 1993. Since 2012, it has been in reserve awaiting repairs, in 2014 it was delivered to the Zvezda Far East plant, where it is located to this day.

Comments

[Flooding]

It's a pity that the dates are shifting.
Almost three years ago (in January 2019), they wrote on VO:

"In mid-February last year, a delegation of the Ministry of Defense, headed by Deputy Minister Yuri Borisov, visited the Far Eastern enterprises of the defense complex. Among other things, representatives of the Ministry of Defense visited the Far East plant" Zvezda ", which is responsible for servicing the submarines of the Pacific fleet. According to known data, it is now undergoing repairs and modernization of three nuclear submarines of pr. 949A at once - K-132 "Irkutsk", K-186 "Omsk" and K-442 "Chelyabinsk".

During the events at the Zvezda Far Eastern Plant, Deputy Minister Yury Borisov noted that the Pacific Fleet will be able to receive four modernized Anteyas with new weapons by 2021. "

[Flooding]

I wonder how many Anteyevs managed to upgrade to the level of 949AM at the moment?
None of them seem to have been commissioned yet.
"Omsk" is not mentioned in this article. Perhaps it is being modernized at the same time as Irkutsk. It would be nice.

[Bashkirkhan]

Quote: Flood

None of them seem to have been commissioned yet.
"Omsk" is not mentioned in this article. Perhaps it is being modernized at the same time as Irkutsk. It would be nice.

Omsk has recently undergone a restoration of technical readiness. It has not undergone modernization and at least medium repairs. Photo of "Omsk" in the boathouse. While the ship is in the fleet, it must periodically undergo medium repairs. It will not last long without medium repair.

[Alex777]

Quote: Flood

It's a pity that the dates are shifting.

Apparently Zircon was expected. But they are just finishing testing it.
Something completely stopped talking about Caliber on 949AM ...

[Flooding]

Quote: Alex777

Apparently Zircon was expected. But they are just finishing testing it.
Something completely stopped talking about Caliber on 949AM ...

I can't agree with you
Zircon will go to Chelyabinsk
In the meantime, "Irkutsk" has not been completed, which they began to modernize according to the Onyx / Caliber version (without Zircon)
wasting time waiting for Zircon to be ready and slowing down modernization according to the current version is pointless.
It's just that Zircon is maturing on time at Chelyabinsk.

[Alex777]

NNP Caliber has one launch equipment, while Onyx and Zircon have a different one.
For example, this is why 11356 cannot use Onyxes and therefore Zircons.

[Flooding]

Quote: Alex777

NNP Caliber has one launch equipment, while Onyx and Zircon have a different one.
For example, this is why 11356 cannot use Onyxes and therefore Zircons.

"MOSCOW, January 12, 2021, 16:51 - REGNUM The Kazan multipurpose nuclear submarine is completing tests and is preparing to be handed over to the military," Sevmash general director Mikhail Budnichenko told reporters on January 12.

He recalled that in December 2020, the nuclear-powered icebreaker successfully conducted rocket fires in the White Sea, using Caliber cruise missiles and Onyx anti-ship missiles.

"The lead nuclear submarine of the Kazan series is completing a test cycle and is preparing to be handed over to the fleet. In December, the ship was successfully fired off with Onyx and Caliber missiles in the White Sea," the corporate magazine Zavod quotes Budnichenko as saying. "

[Alex777]

By the way, yes. Then everything will be fine. Caliber-M with 5000 km range on 949AM would look lovely.

[Serge-667]

..would look lovely.

Antey is imprisoned to fight ship strike groups. Why is it carrying cruise missiles designed to destroy ground targets? This should be done by strategists with the appropriate firing range. And to drive this cruiser under the coast of the USA on alert, in the hope that it will successfully shoot from a distance of 500 miles from the American coast in case of something like that.
It's more like sabotage and sabotage.

[Alex777]

Quote: Serge-667

And to drive this cruiser under the coast of the USA on alert, in the hope that it will successfully shoot from a distance of 500 miles from the American coast in case of something like that.

First, our "partners" are promised a flight time of 5 minutes.
Secondly, Caliber-M can be launched from afar.
Third, the States have many important coastal targets.

[Serge-667]

What are their "important" goals on the coast?
Once again, the question is:
For launch, Antaeus must enter, practically, in the zone of exclusive economic interests of the United States in order to successfully shoot, taking into account the range of the Caliber. Caliber M - a rocket exclusively for destruction of GROUND targets. 5 thousand km is slightly more than 2,5 thousand nautical miles.
HOW MUCH do you need to get close to the coast to fire a salvo at targets located two to three thousand kilometers from the coastline? HOW, in the conditions of total monitoring of the situation on its coast by the United States, including 24/7 work on the protection of strategic objects, will you ensure the secrecy and surprise (not to mention the effectiveness) of the use of CRBD from this carrier?

The Soviet Union, due to the lack of prospects, ceased to carry out military service along the American coast in the mid-70s of the last century. And work to increase the range of the BMBM was carried out continuously for this very reason.
Do you have any new revelations on this topic, except how to send people in iron to the guaranteed death?

[Alex777]

Don’t worry so much.
We are no longer sending anyone anywhere. We reason and that's it.
On the coast of the States, all naval bases. Washington too.
Most major cities. Nuclear facilities.
Although, you are right, the Baton is not at all ideal for such tasks.
But so far no one but him. Ash trees have not been built yet.
Did I understand you correctly that Zircon is not an option for purposes on US territory?
By the way, their system for detecting our SOSUS submarines is no longer fully functional. EMNIP, approximately since 2010.

[Serge-667]

It does not fully work due to replacement with new, more advanced systems.
And what has Zircon with an even shorter range to do with it?
You will not ensure the combat stability of the ship under such conditions. And this means that the likelihood of him completing a combat mission is minimal. In such a situation, this is money down the drain. And, what is most terrible, certain death for people.
The use of KRBD is justified as the beginning of a preemptive strike. Those. not defense, but an act of aggression, followed by either a nuclear strike or an assault on the coast with an amphibious assault. In other cases, it is the suicide of the state.

But Zircon, as protection against IBM, is quite a worthy task.

[Alex777]

Quote: Serge-667

And what has Zircon with an even shorter range to do with it?

How do you think you can provide a flight time of 5 minutes? Purely presumably ...

Quote: Serge-667

an act of aggression, followed by either a nuclear strike or an assault on the coast with an amphibious assault.

First. We have no strength for the second.

Quote: Serge-667

But Zircon, as protection against IBM, is quite a worthy task.

Japan can also be driven, IMHO. Is not it so?

[Serge-667]

How do you think you can provide a flight time of 5 minutes?

I have no idea.
Zircon, as an anti-ship missile, according to official data, flies 5 km in 450 minutes.
And an ICBM, if only Sineva with a liquid-propellant engine and with the maximum, again, close range. In any case, a solid-fuel Mace will not be able to handle it in 5 minutes. She needs to spend all the fuel.
But from Europe, to us, in 5 minutes, the RIAC may well arrive. However, like ours to them.

[Alex777]

Quote: Serge-667

I have no idea.

GDP spoke about this again last week.
That we can do it almost right now.
You can have different attitudes, but I don't believe in bluffs.
Zircon is versatile over the surface. Even Uranus.
Already all our anti-ship missiles can hit targets on the ground.
In Syria, Uranus flew into the window when it was used.

[bayard]

Quote: Serge-667

The use of KRBD is justified as the beginning of a preemptive strike.

This is only if they are for us. We still have no AWACS on duty in the air, so the ZGRLS will give an alert.
And here we have KRBD on them ... from the heart of the ocean (like so that no one would guess) - this is unlikely ... if it’s about pervrm or a preemptive strike.
The first strike should be lightning fast and irresistible and hit the command centers, early warning systems, missile defense systems, airfields, naval bases, arsenals, etc. But not by subsonic missile launchers - they will spot them ahead of time and easily intercept by aviation.
The KRBD is precisely the weapon of the SECOND strike, when the air defense systems are disabled, the airfields are demolished ... and the KRBD should enter into these gaps in a second wave and work out on the military infrastructure. But to take out air defense, missile defense, airfields, missile defense systems ... this is just more convenient with those same "Zircons" (if this is not a bluff), even from a distance of 400 - 500 km (but it would be better from 1000 km., So also you can survive.
And as a retaliatory strike - also an option. Immediately after ICBMs and SLBMs (which will go after additional reconnaissance of targets struck by ICBMs), after the launch of the Kalibrov and Calibrov-M carriers. Then, for sure, there will be no air defense, no ZGRLS (the indignant troposphere will not give even if the stations themselves survive), and they will go to the targets without any objections.

Quote: Serge-667

But Zircon, as protection against IBM, is quite a worthy task.

And on KUG \ AUG is possible, if she knows how. And if not, then Onyx. Having laid the "Path" on the old groundwork, to be sure.

[Serge-667]

Absolutely agree with you.

But we have KRBD on them ... from the heart of the ocean (like so that no one would guess) - this is hardly

Quite right. Precisely because it is impossible to drive Baton on a regular basis into this type of alert. That he was at a constant distance of the shot from their coast and that the factor of surprise remains ... This is from the realm of fantasies of the correspondents about the Sharks plying the Hudson.
Here SSBNs into the waters adjacent to US are problematic to pull out without "friendly" escort, like Antey in Florida ... And even with cruise missiles. And Zircon is just a horror story so far. No more. In any case, such tasks are solved not by one ship, but by ten. Arming a dozen 949 KRBDs is not possible from the word AT ALL. Therefore, it is senseless and criminal to change the purpose of these boats, the fight against AUG / KUG. One has already been ditched under some Poseidon.

If Zircon can really replace Onyx in terms of increasing the combat capability of the boats of this project, then God forbid. In the meantime, apart from Onyx, I personally do not observe anything real for 949. The caliber as a RCC is too small, excuse the pun)

[bayard]

Quote: Serge-667

Precisely because it is impossible to drive Baton on a regular basis into this type of alert. That he was at a constant distance of the shot from their coast and that the factor of surprise remains.

It is unlikely that the Baton will be sent to the American coast until the task of protecting the adjacent waters from the enemy fleet is solved. Yes, and in this way they will have time to modernize from the strength of 2 - 3 pieces. It will be another matter if, after the completion of the Boreyev-A series, the construction of the Borey-K series with CD in launch tubes will begin. For it is highly desirable to have attack submarines under the enemy's coast, and the size of their ammunition is very significant.
"Borey" is twice as cheap as "Ash", and BK has 2+ times more. At the same time, oddly enough, it turned out to be more secretive (jet propulsion) and has a larger supply of torpedoes (40 versus 30). So the creation on its basis of a SSGN with "Zircons", "Onyxes" and "Caliber-M" has been asking for a long time and persistently. Even Shoigu a couple of years ago hinted at the need to bookmark such SSGNs.
Here is their place under the enemy's shore, but this will not be possible soon.
And Yaseni can be driven to such services, but ... we have a terrible shortage of MAPLs, and they do not want to solve this issue in any way ... except for the repairs that have already begun on the Soviet Schuk-B, but this will only delay the complete denudation of the Fleet in this type of ships.

Quote: Serge-667

Therefore, it is senseless and criminal to change the purpose of these boats, the fight against AUG / KUG.

Well, there will be quite a few of them, so the AUG \ KUG will have to deal with the "Ash", which is the most that is, the SSGN (they were classified as such in the design of the head one back in the USSR - SSGN for a new type of anti-ship missile system " Onyx ").

Quote: Serge-667

The caliber as a RCC is too small, excuse the pun)

As an anti-ship missile system, there can only be a version of it with a supersonic second stage, and this is a means of self-defense for submarines for firing from a TA. Likewise, a narrow, but important specialization has the PLUR "Answer", which is also more reasonable to shoot from a TA.
For a strike on the shore, "Caliber" is quite a worthy instrument, especially in a special version. But the "Caliber-M" with a range of 4000 - 4500 km. , this is already for shooting from remote areas of the Ocean with ensuring the maximum survival mode for their carriers.
These are all tools, and their set is pretty good. It’s bad that you can count the speakers on your fingers, but there’s no time left.
The air smells of war.

[Alex777]

I'm not the only one asking questions ...
https://svpressa.ru/war21/article/318931/

According to the Russian diplomat, relations with the United States today may well again reach a situation similar to the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962. That is, according to Ryabkov, we have already figured out how, in the current political realities, to return Washington to a situation where their capital will not just be in the zone of destruction of our missiles. But their flight time, at least, will not exceed that projected for the "Dark Eagles" in relation to Moscow - several tens of minutes. Anything else would be too far from the conditions of the Cuban missile crisis. And the organization of mutually beneficial negotiations on detente would help little.

Just what specific Ryabkov, who was probably familiar with the most secret developments of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation by his position, could have had in mind? To transfer Russian weapons with Russian combat crews to Cuba again?

It is unlikely. Because too much has shown in recent years that we really would not mind reserving such an opportunity for Russia. But so far, absolutely nothing indicates that Havana is ready for this ...
Havana, obviously, remembers all too well the lessons of the Cuban Missile Crisis that brought the island to the brink of physical existence. And he does not want to repeat it.
What is left?

[bayard]

I also read this article, but they have been talking about the fact that in Cuba and Venezuela our Defense Ministry plans to establish bases for 5 years already. I think they are doing something.
As for the experiences "but will Cuba want to, will it be allowed to place it?" , I would advise you to remember what size the debt was written off to her. And we do not know the closed protocols of that agreement, but ... they remind about the Cuban missile crisis and the Defense Ministry and GDP for a reason.
What to put?
Rockets. Winged - container and mobile. GZUR in the same containers or on PU BGRK "Bastion".
Possibly a two-stage Iskander-X, the pictures of which appeared immediately after the US withdrawn from the INF Treaty.
A composite brigade of the Aerospace Forces from a regiment on fighters (Su-35 \ Su-57), a regiment on tactical bombers (Su-34 \ Su-34M) and a mixed helicopter regiment.
A mixed-type anti-aircraft missile brigade (S-400 \ S-500, S-350, Pantsir-SM ").
Reinforced brigade of the Ground Forces with attached battalions of the Airborne Forces and the MP.
Reincarnation of the RTR center in Lourdes and the MTO base for the Navy.
And let the guys serve in beautiful places.

And in Venezuela too, but there is a naval base, an airfield for Long-Range Aviation ... missiles - at the discretion. But because of the greater distances, the Caliber-M will be needed with a range of 4000 - 4500 km. and IRBM of the same range.
It is possible to drag "Sineva" and "Liner" there - they still have a full resource, and "Dolphins" will write off everything by the end of the decade. "Sineva!" And "Liner" can fly along a flat trajectory ... and their BB is more powerful and larger than that of Bulava ... Let them stand there - the world is strengthened.

And there will be funds for this from the increased prices for gas, coal, metals and food.

[Nemchinov Vl]

Quote: Serge-667

The Soviet Union, due to the lack of prospects, ceased to carry out military service along the American coast in the mid-70s of the last century.

it seems the crew of V. Dudko, a little later tried it all the same ... at Bangor. And not without success.
And now it would probably be possible ... If, - "Have something to walk to such a distance" (this is me about the mass character of the ISSAPL) ...
If the industrial forces would not be "connected" by a series of super-expensive "Ash trees" ... We need a smaller MCSN project (something in the middle between the "Condor / Barakuda / Varshavyanka") on a water cannon, and without mine TLUs, by 6 TA 533 mm., capable of using "Physicist / Case and Onyx / Caliber" through TA ...
And there should be 5-6 such submarines for the Northern Fleet and Pacific Fleet, in addition to the old existing submarines (971 and 949) ...

[Serge-667]

.. it seems the crew of V. Dudko, a little later all the same tried

Which ones are at RTMK? So, too, a completely different calico. And the tasks are different.
They didn’t have to carry the cosmodrome with them on the hump ..
There, after Dudko, we regularly ran along the route. And Lobanov was celebrated after .. And not only.
And about multipurpose, I absolutely agree. There is a lack of them like air. You can stick 8 TA. You can even take as a basis the defective layout of the TA from Sivulf, with all its shortcomings, in order to free the nose under a normal GAC. And bring GPBA to mind. The main thing is that the boat hears everything and is perfectly quiet itself.
I still do not understand why this elephant, Ash, in such quantities.

And there should be 5-6 such submarines for the Northern Fleet and Pacific Fleet, in addition to the old existing submarines (971 and 949) ...

Not enough, I'm afraid, considering that the lifetimes of 949 and 971, alas, are coming to an end.

[Ingvar 72]

Quote: Flood

It's a pity the dates are shifting

And now they are no longer even voiced.
Against this background, the plans for rearmament look a little ridiculous.

[VALERIK_097]

It is worth recognizing that VTG, ships of Soviet construction are undergoing medium repairs, components and assemblies were made in Ukraine, Armenia, Azerbaijan, etc., that is, in fact, there are no factories anymore. If the time is shifted to the right, you should not be surprised. from the wheels, the industry issued, we mounted ((((. (We defected 8 elements of the same type on the order - the delivery time is a year, even if you kick the contractors, it won't work faster, because orders under construction are also tied.

[Mountain shooter]

Great news. Strengthens the shock component of the fleet.
Only I don’t understand. We had an article here yesterday that there is no "Zircon", because it cannot be! In my opinion, Kaptsova. And what then will this boat be equipped with? And what did they adopt? You can probably create such a look "on paper" ... But on such a scale, it is impossible to hide such a scam.
I suppose the rocket is still there. And Kaptsov is a little out of the picture.

[paul3390]

there is no "Zircon"

Without doubting the reality of Zircon, I really would like to understand why a car in Onyx's dimensions shows such results.

[tralflot1832]

Most importantly, a word when the start button is pressed.

[Alex777]

Quote: paul3390

Without doubting the reality of Zircon, I really would like to understand why a car in Onyx's dimensions shows such results.

Those who want to understand the queue are worth it.
But there are more rejoicing.

[ALARI]

This news does not reinforce anything. The boat will strengthen the shock component of the fleet WHEN it is on duty, and while the boat is at the factory, its power is equal to 0.

[Nemchinov Vl]

Quote: ALARI

This news does not reinforce anything. The boat will strengthen the shock component of the fleet WHEN it is on duty, and while the boat is at the factory, its power is equal to 0.

objectively, soberly, sensibly !!! (+)
Interestingly, now really for the entire Pacific Fleet, one SSNS (971) and one SSGN (949), capable of going to sea on the BS ...? !!!

[smart ass]

For kaptsov, it would have been a better outcome for the Antey to be melted down and one battleship built in 1939

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: Mountain Shooter

We had an article here yesterday that there is no "Zircon",

The author did not say that there was no Zircon, he doubted its hypersound.

[Carat]

Quote: Krasnoyarsk

Quote: Mountain Shooter

We had an article here yesterday that there is no "Zircon",

The author did not say that there was no Zircon, he doubted its hypersound.

Americans do not doubt something.

[venik]

Quote: Mountain Shooter

We had an article here yesterday that there is no "Zircon", because it cannot be! In my opinion, Kaptsova.

=========
Of course Kaptsova! Whom else? No, he has very sensible and interesting articles .... But sometimes, as Ostapa begins to "carry" him, and with tremendous dexterity he manages to "put the cart in front of the horse", then he successfully contrives "get lost in three pines"...... And then he himself is surprised ( ) and draws absolutely false conclusions! So it happened with yesterday's article about "Zircon" - he allowed fundamental "blooper", around which he began "fence a garden ", naturally coming to the conclusion that the hypersonic" Zircon "," [i] cannot be, because there can never be".....

[Serge-667]

And what did they adopt?

Can you tell me the source of the information? When was it adopted?

[moreman78]

The submarine was sent for repairs back in 2014, but the lack of funding has pushed the timeline for modernization. Later, the Ministry of Defense reported that the nuclear submarines "Irkutsk" and "Chelyabinsk" would be upgraded to the level of Project 949AM, and they would receive new weapons during the repair.

And if you wait another 20 years, is there a chance to equip it with a "death star"? The boat is needed yesterday, and we have effective management all around - either there is no money, then there is no equipment, then the new weapons are not ready ...

[Uncle lee]

The submarine was sent for repairs back in 2014, but the lack of funding has pushed the timeline for modernization.

I'm bursting with pride!

[Pilat2009]

Quote: moreman78

The submarine was sent for repairs back in 2014, but the lack of funding has pushed the timeline for modernization. Later, the Ministry of Defense reported that the nuclear submarines "Irkutsk" and "Chelyabinsk" would be upgraded to the level of Project 949AM, and they would receive new weapons during the repair.

And if you wait another 20 years, is there a chance to equip it with a "death star"? The boat is needed yesterday, and we have effective management all around - either there is no money, then there is no equipment, then the new weapons are not ready ...

Here the naval commanders were indignant that the battleships did not have time to surrender to the roar ... The rotten tsarist regime, you know

[Jacket in stock]

Quote: moreman78

The boat is needed yesterday

Who needs it?
Why is it necessary?

What happened "yesterday" that would not have happened if she had been there?

[tralflot1832]

From the photo on Zvezda, I counted only two covered slipways for nuclear submarines, but a new workshop was built next to it, maybe also for a nuclear submarine.

[Bashkirkhan]

There are two covered slipways, one of which is currently "Irkutsk" 949A on modernization, on the other "Magadan" 971 projects on restoration of technical readiness. "Chelyabinsk" in the water area of ​​the plant near the wall since 2014.

[Grits]

Quote: tralflot1832

From the photo on Zvezda, I counted only two covered slipways for nuclear submarines, but a new workshop was built next to it, maybe also for a nuclear submarine.

Not at all. This is a workshop for the preparation of structures for new ships - gas carriers, tankers, icebreakers. They are still silent about military orders for them.

[Tests]

"Zvezda", unlike "Zvezdochka", was not included in the register of dishonest suppliers. "Zvezda", unlike "Zvezdochka", does not carry out hull assembly and welding works for the construction and joining of blocks (including those that were made by the "Northern Machine-Building Enterprise" on the southern bank of the Nikolsky mouth of the Northern Dvina and these blocks had to be installed " The asterisk "to deliver) the offshore ice-resistant platform for the Kamennomysskoye - Sea" field in the main hull shop. And the orders, both at "Zvezda", I mean the nuclear submarine "Irkutsk" (under repair since 2008) and the nuclear submarine "Chelyabinsk" (under repair since 2014), and on the "Zvezdochka" "Leopard" (under repair since 2012 ) and the nuclear submarine "Samara" (under repair since 2014), it is good if in 2022 they go to the seas for tests. My favorite minuses, that they threw me minuses a couple of days ago, in the comments about the Samara nuclear submarine, explain with good reason who is to blame for Zvezda and what to do in the Russian Federation with the repair of naval ships.

[lis-ik]

It may stop already on VO to publish "news" from the category should and will, most have long understood that this is just chatter. Or does the editorial office take an example from the zeroed one and its command?

[rocket757]

Antey, which is waiting for modernization at the Far East Zvezda, will receive the Zircon hypersonic missiles

An active, powerful submarine fleet is a serious component of the country's defense ...

[Alien From]

Eight years waiting for repairs ...... repair is coming out our main enemy ((((

[The Dragon]

One gets the impression that boat repairs are being sabotaged by an "invisible hand"; it is necessary to monitor this matter more carefully, and especially to the money.
In terms of timing, everything is generally fun. If Irkutsk, God forbid, will be handed over at 22, (and if not) then Chelyabinsk when?) As if not in the 30s
Sadly that's all.