Military Review

The Ministry of Defense announced the arrival in the troops of a new batch of ZRPK "Pantsir"

43

The Defense Ministry expects a new batch of Pantsir anti-aircraft missile-gun systems to enter the troops. The delivery of equipment will take place before the end of the year, said the commander of the air defense and missile defense forces - deputy commander of the Russian Aerospace Forces, Lieutenant General Andrei Demin.


According to the general, by the end of the year, the air defense forces will receive three divisional sets of Pantsir-S air defense missile systems. Demin did not provide more detailed information, it is also unknown whether the already modernized Pantsir-SM air defense missile systems or the Pantsir-S air defense missile systems previously adopted for service will be delivered.

Demin also spoke about the anti-aircraft and anti-missile systems delivered this year. As follows from the interview given by him to the publication "Independent Military Review"During this year, the air defense forces received two regimental sets of S-400 air defense systems, a regimental set of the new S-350 Vityaz air defense system, as well as more than 600 anti-aircraft guided missiles of various types.

Note that a new Pantsir-SM anti-aircraft missile-gun system has been developed for the Russian army, in which all the shortcomings inherent in the base model have been corrected. Unlike the Pantsir-S air defense missile system already in service, the new complex was armed with a missile with an increased speed (up to Mach 5 against 1300 m / s of the Pantsir-S missile 57E6E). In addition, Pantsir-SM received a new multifunctional sighting station with an active phased antenna array, which allows it to "see" targets at a distance of up to 75 km. The aiming range of the new complex has been increased to 40 km. The complex is capable of recognizing and striking all types of unmanned aerial vehicles.

The export version of the ZRPK, previously supplied abroad, has the name "Pantsir-S1E" ("E" stands for export), and the modernized version is called "Pantsir-S1ME".
43 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. swnvaleria
    swnvaleria 10 December 2021 11: 12
    +5
    It's a good news ! a successful technique must develop and improve!
  2. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 10 December 2021 11: 14
    +2
    The necessary modernization, taking into account the active development of all types of UAVs, and of course missile weapons.
    1. venik
      venik 10 December 2021 17: 38
      0
      Quote: Alexey-74
      The necessary modernization, taking into account the active development of all types of UAVs, and of course missile weapons.

      ========
      "....for the Russian army, a new anti-aircraft missile-gun complex "Pantsir-SM" has been developed, in which fixed all the flaws inherent in the base model... .... " good Hurry up!
      But at the same time, I would very much like that on the front-line "Pantsir-S" they also did not forget to carry out modernization: there are quite a few of them in the troops and the tasks they face are serious!
  3. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 10 December 2021 11: 21
    +1
    Good news, we are in complete order with the air defense system. Interestingly, the first, full salvo of long-range air defense systems has increased?
    1. YOUR
      YOUR 10 December 2021 15: 48
      +3
      AFIGET !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      FULL VOICE.
      Do we have air defense systems firing in volleys?
      1. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 10 December 2021 16: 11
        -1
        The Americans are counting at the command post exercises, about 6 years ago. They counted the number of Russian air defense systems, how many air defense systems can fire missiles without reloading and shed tears. We sympathized with them and offered to cut the sturgeon exactly in half. The entire US aviation was enough for exactly three raids. In the Hollywood film "Independence Day" pilots of agricultural aviation are going into battle.
      2. Alexander Seklitsky
        Alexander Seklitsky 10 December 2021 20: 06
        0
        Yes, there is such a method of firing at targets: a volley of one, two, or even three missiles. almost simultaneously, though not from one launcher
        1. YOUR
          YOUR 11 December 2021 02: 20
          +1
          The Brothers Grimm take off their hat.
          1. Alexander Seklitsky
            Alexander Seklitsky 11 December 2021 08: 00
            0
            What's wrong? What is your phrase
            1. YOUR
              YOUR 11 December 2021 08: 06
              +1
              Do not be offended but to what you wrote.
              1. Alexander Seklitsky
                Alexander Seklitsky 11 December 2021 08: 09
                0
                Can you reasonably refute?
            2. YOUR
              YOUR 11 December 2021 08: 23
              +1
              Carapace launched one missile from the right SAM package, while the left one will it be a salvo?
              Or is the S-300/400 three missiles from different launchers at one target, is it a salvo? True, these air defense systems can direct only 2 missiles to one target.
              In the ZRV there is no such thing as a salvo and there cannot be. Earlier, when there were S-75 air defense systems, 200 was the concept of a turn.
              Up to 6 missiles could be launched on the target. The commander gave a command to target # such a turn of 2 - 3 ...- 6 interval 2-3 ... 10 seconds "Start". But a volley is something outrageous.
              1. Alexander Seklitsky
                Alexander Seklitsky 11 December 2021 09: 21
                0
                Well, the BUK air defense missile system can simultaneously fire two missiles at a target, say with a sow and with a conjugate pzu, at the same time. And this will be considered a salvo.
                1. YOUR
                  YOUR 11 December 2021 09: 27
                  +1
                  Yeah in one gulp broads. On enemy aircraft the tube is shishteen sight one hundred and twenty volley FIRE.

                  Sorry for the joke. Don't write nonsense.
                  1. Alexander Seklitsky
                    Alexander Seklitsky 11 December 2021 12: 37
                    0
                    Even an ICBM Bulava somehow managed to launch in a salvo. Of 16 missiles. And really laugh
                    1. YOUR
                      YOUR 11 December 2021 12: 54
                      +1
                      The officers laughed when they read such a passage.
                      Well this is not the media, this is the SMD - the media of disinformation
                      1. Alexander Seklitsky
                        Alexander Seklitsky 11 December 2021 16: 12
                        0
                        Following your logic, GRAD and URAGAN are also not multiple launch rocket systems. They take turns firing missiles from the guides. But for some reason they are called that.
                      2. YOUR
                        YOUR 12 December 2021 03: 14
                        +1
                        There is no need to follow this logic. Guided rockets do not fire in one gulp. Don't bend your ideas to reality.
  4. Pavel57
    Pavel57 10 December 2021 11: 21
    +13
    up to Mach 5 against 1300 m / s of the 57E6E missile of the Pantsir-S complex.

    Comparing Mach with m / s ... something new.
    1. Vladimir_2U
      Vladimir_2U 10 December 2021 11: 31
      +3
      Quote: Pavel57
      Comparing Mach with m / s ... something new.

      Well, what, the Mach number is roughly the speed of sound. The funny thing is that 1300 m / s and 5 m at sea level are about the same.
      1. venik
        venik 10 December 2021 14: 08
        +5
        Quote: Vladimir_2U
        Well, what, the Mach number is roughly the speed of sound. The funny thing is that 1300 m / s and 5 m at sea level are about the same.

        =======
        Not really! The speed of sound (Mach number) at normal pressure and humidity at sea level is 335 m / s. That. 1300 m / s = 3.8M. Well, 5M = 1675 m / s. those. the speed increased by ~ 1.3 times. hi
        PS Well, to compare "God's gift" from fried eggs - it's really - good lol drinks
        1. Vladimir_2U
          Vladimir_2U 10 December 2021 16: 49
          +2
          Quote: venik
          Not really! The speed of sound (Mach number) at normal pressure and humidity at sea level is 335 m / s. That. 1300 m / s = 3.8M
          Yes, I was tired by the end of the working week, I could not multiply three hundred by five. What a disgrace! recourse
          1. venik
            venik 10 December 2021 17: 08
            +1
            Quote: Vladimir_2U
            Yes, I was tired by the end of the working week, I could not multiply three hundred by five. What a disgrace!

            =========
            Yes, nothing - it's clear: Friday is a hard day! But - ahead - the weekend -drinks By the way! Monday is also a hard day! wassat
            Have a good weekend!
    2. Nikolaevich I
      Nikolaevich I 10 December 2021 11: 36
      +9
      Quote: Pavel57
      Comparing Mach with m / s ... something new.

      And what is it like here? request You can also translate! yes Up to 1710 m / s versus 1300 m / s .... good
    3. Cottodraton
      Cottodraton 10 December 2021 12: 51
      +1
      5x330m / s - it was just too lazy to translate
  5. Nikolaevich I
    Nikolaevich I 10 December 2021 11: 44
    +1
    Again "the fog is thickening"! Where did this Pantsir-S1ME "hatch" from, if "Pantsir-S1M" is the "export version"! "Pantsir-S1M" was not meant "to sebe"! "Until sebe" prepared "Pantsir-CM"! request
    1. venik
      venik 10 December 2021 19: 20
      +1
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      Where did this Pantsir-S1ME "hatch" from, if "Pantsir-S1M" is the "export version"

      =======
      Or renamed or another "author" shows the world the wonders of "erudition"! Like: if "export" means "E" should be at the end lol
  6. Jacket in stock
    Jacket in stock 10 December 2021 11: 48
    -16
    complex "Pantsir-SM", in which all the shortcomings inherent in the base model have been corrected.

    Is everything straight?
    What, and the guns are not crooked?
  7. Pavel57
    Pavel57 10 December 2021 11: 58
    +4
    Quote: Nikolaevich I
    Quote: Pavel57
    Comparing Mach with m / s ... something new.

    And what is it like here? request You can also translate! yes Up to 1710 m / s versus 1300 m / s .... good

    Incorrect translation: 3.8 Mach units versus Mach 5 units.)))
  8. Al_lexx
    Al_lexx 10 December 2021 12: 37
    +7
    I like the chassis. Good wheels.
    I would have such, with a kung, would heal ..))
    A joke of humor. In my years, serving in the country's air defense, I never dreamed of such complexes. And there is nothing to say about the S-400 at all. When he served (79-81gg), there was one order - to release missiles (S-75 and S-200) and run into the woods until the respondents were covered. They covered the naval aviation and the Pskov landing party.
    So it goes...
    1. Third district
      Third district 13 December 2021 15: 41
      -1
      There are many claims to these machines, based on KamAZ 8 × 8, due to their high center of gravity. On rough terrain, they tip over on their side. The tracked version is much more comfortable.
      1. Al_lexx
        Al_lexx 14 December 2021 04: 23
        -1
        Quote: Third District
        There are many claims to these machines, based on KamAZ 8 × 8, due to their high center of gravity. On rough terrain, they tip over on their side. The tracked version is much more comfortable.

        Hmm .... It is these cars that are made to drive on relatively normal roads. And the level of cross-country ability here is solely as an additional and not so poorly implemented option. But the running resource and the speed of movement are not comparable with any caterpillar. It is not for nothing that now a very fashionable topic is wheeled light tanks, etc. technology.
        I remember very well how the caterpillar flew off the BAT, on the march in a column (we were driving from the Sara Shagan training ground, for loading, spring 81). The tractor lay almost on its side, with a sharp turn at 45 degrees, while the kung, which he was dragging on a rigid hitch, was blown to pieces. And why? But because the march is almost 200 km, at a speed of about 80 km / h, which is prohibitive values ​​for a caterpillar. But we needed to show a high speed of redeployment, since the exercises are counted in full from the moment of loading at the "home railway" station and back until unloading at it. The speed of movement along the railway was not taken into account, since our letter let through passenger and freight trains. But the speed of redeployment, folding / unfolding, the shooting themselves, it all went into the offset.
        1. The comment was deleted.
  9. expert
    expert 10 December 2021 13: 11
    0
    And it pleases!
  10. Vadim237
    Vadim237 10 December 2021 13: 54
    +1
    In division 12 "Armor" there are three divisions - 36 air defense missile systems will receive.
    1. YOUR
      YOUR 10 December 2021 15: 51
      +1
      Where did you get this?
  11. senima56
    senima56 10 December 2021 18: 51
    0
    How the air needs shells with remote detonation! And not only in the 30 mm caliber!
    1. venik
      venik 11 December 2021 00: 30
      0
      Quote: senima56
      How the air needs shells with remote detonation! And not only in the 30 mm caliber!

      =========
      Well, it seems to be already there! And not only 130, 100 and 76 mm, but also 57 mm and 30 mm. For the 30-mm, there seemed to be an interesting system in its simplicity: the detonation occurs by radio command, when a single projectile or a group of projectiles (fired in a burst) are detonated in the target area (according to radar or laser rangefinder data) and the estimated time of arrival.
  12. venik
    venik 10 December 2021 20: 22
    0
    "...In addition, Pantsir-SM received a new multifunctional sighting station with active phased array antenna, .... "
    ========
    Active? It's a pity the author of the article wished to remain anonymous! I really want to ask him: what is THIS ???

    And what for is this device needed by a station with an ACTIVE phased array? No, for a station with passive FAR - its purpose is quite understandable, but for AFAR - request
    PS No need to publish unverified information! Better yet, not write about what you don't understand!
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 10 December 2021 20: 45
      0
      Indeed, what is it in the photo and what is it for?
      1. venik
        venik 10 December 2021 23: 57
        0
        Quote: Vadim237
        Indeed, what is it in the photo and what is it for?

        =======
        And this is actually main emitter! If we replace the PAR with a parabolic mirror, then everything becomes clear: the beam is directed in the opposite direction, and the resonators (secondary emitting elements with phase shifters) are located at the nodes of the PFAR array, which perform the functions of a "parabolic mirror", but unlike the latter, they allow scanning the beam formed as a result of interference of secondary waves formed by resonators (secondary emitters) not only mechanically but also electronically (due to phase shifters) within +/- 45 degrees, in the vertical and horizontal plane (relative to the normal to the PAR surface). This PFAR is referred to as a "reflective type array". A classic example is the Pantsirya-SM SSRTs. But active HEADLIGHTS of such devices simply DO NOT HAVE, since each emitter of the array, in addition to the amplifier, phase shifter and the emitter itself, also has a built-in generator! Therefore, the presence of this device means that we are dealing with passive HEADLIGHT reflective type. It should be noted that the absence of this "device" does not mean that we see AFAR, since we can deal with the so-called PFAR. "through" (lens type). case
        hi
    2. Nikolaevich I
      Nikolaevich I 10 December 2021 20: 56
      0
      Quote: venik
      active phased array antenna, .... "
      ========
      Active?

      Wasn't the new SOC "Pantsir-SM" "attributed to" AFAR? Otherwise, AFAR was not mentioned! request
      1. venik
        venik 11 December 2021 00: 16
        0
        Quote: Nikolaevich I
        Wasn't the new SOC "Pantsir-SM" "attributed to" AFAR? Otherwise, AFAR was not mentioned!

        =======
        The presence of the main emitter placed in front of the HEADLIGHTS canvas - unambiguously indicates that this is a PFAR reflective type!
        As for the surveillance radar, nothing can be said: it can be both AFAR and PFAR of the "pass-through" (lens) type. hi
  13. max91
    max91 11 December 2021 00: 23
    0
    "5 swings against 1300 m / s ...". Why not write 1700 m / s versus 1300 m / s.