Tests of the fourth patrol ship of project 22160 for the Black Sea Fleet are being completed

The fourth patrol ship of project 22160 "Sergei Kotov", built at the Kerch shipyard "Zaliv", is completing testing. According to the press service of the Southern Military District, the ship's crew carried out an armament check.

As part of the passage of tests, the ship entered the Black Sea, where, at one of the sea ranges of the Black Sea fleet fired from the AK-176 installation, naval machine guns and DP-65 anti-sabotage grenade launcher systems. Prior to this, the ship's crew and the delivery team checked the operation of on-board devices, systems and mechanisms.

The "Sergei Kotov" entered the factory sea trials at the end of October, for the first time independently leaving the Novorossiysk naval base. According to available information, the tests should be completed by the end of the year, the patrol boat will become part of the formation of ships of the Novorossiysk naval base.

The patrol ship "Sergei Kotov" was named in honor of the Hero of the Soviet Union, participant in the defense of Odessa and Sevastopol, the liberation of Novorossiysk and Crimea, Rear Admiral Sergei Kotov. It is the fourth ship of Project 22160 and the third production ship in a series of six ships. Laid down on May 8, 2016, launched on January 29, 2021. The entire series is intended for the Black Sea Fleet, the first three ships are already in service, two more are being completed in Zelenodolsk.

Project 22160 patrol ship (corvette) has a displacement of 1700 tons and is capable of speeds up to 30 knots. Cruising range - 6000 miles, autonomy - 60 days. The crew is 80 people. On board, the Ka-27PS helicopter is based. As standard weapons, the corvettes are equipped with a 76-mm artillery mount, anti-aircraft missile system and machine guns. A place is provided for the placement of various modules (RCC, missiles, electronic warfare, etc.), depending on the tasks performed.

Comments

[knn54]

The construction of the AIR CARRIER "Queen Elizabeth" has been carried out in the UK since 2009. In July 2014, the ship was launched.
PATROL SHIP Laid down on 8 May 2016, launched on 29 January 2021 Also five years old.
"Impressive," however.

[Bashkirkhan]

Quote: knn54

PATROL SHIP Laid down on 8 May 2016, launched on 29 January 2021 Also five years old.

In five years it was built under sanctions in the expropriated Crimea, which itself is still only 7 years old as part of Russia.

[Nemchinov Vl]

Quote: Bashkirkhan

In five years it was built under sanctions in the expropriated Crimea, which itself is still only 7 years old as part of Russia.

At such a large enterprise, it would be worthwhile to lay something like "Thunder" (Project 12441, where in place of "Medvedka", in front of the wheelhouse, put the third UKSK), on the power plant of four M-70FRU GTEs (about the same as on "Smetliv", for the same engines, with the same speed, and the reducer will be easier to create quickly). And to drive a series of such small escort frigates in parallel with 22350, considering how slowly their construction is going, to fill the fleet with combat-ready ships (!), And not 20380 or 22160 ...

[venik]

Quote: Vl Nemchinov

In such a large enterprise, it would be worthwhile to lay

========
At such a large enterprise, 2 UDC pr. 23900 with a displacement of 40 thousand tons each have ALREADY been laid!
-----------

Quote: Vl Nemchinov

And to drive a series of such small escort frigates in parallel with 22350, given how slowly their construction is going, to fill the fleet with combat-ready ships

========
Firstly, the construction of 22350 is proceeding slowly, mainly due to the limited production capacity of Saturn, which is capable of producing no more than 1 set (2 GTE M-90FR per year), and Zvezda, which can barely cope with orders. Well at least Kolomna produces diesel-gear units DRRA-6000 for this project, otherwise there would be seams!
And here you are proposing a frankly disastrous project 12441 with 4 (four) turbines! Great! It turns out that Saturn and Zvezda will work on one project like TWO Gorshkov !!! Simply fantastic !!!

[Nemchinov Vl]

Quote: venik

And here you are proposing a frankly failed project 12441

frankly it will be a failure crime what USC does (!), vtyuhivaya fleets 20380 and 22160 not having the ability to effectively deal with submarines, and with limited operational air defense systems (and in the second case, its almost complete absence), in the case of real combat operations at sea !!

Quote: venik

проект 12441 with 4 (four) turbines!

M-70 FRU, nor does it fit the 22350 series, (on the contrary, it will only make it more efficient to engage in marine gas turbine engine building) because their power plant uses M-90 FR, those. other GTEs (!).
And structurally, the gearbox for the same gas turbine engine should be an order of magnitude simpler for mass production than for the power plant 22350 (where "link work" diesels and gas turbine engines with different speeds) !!

[Serg65]

Quote: Vl Nemchinov

20380 and 22160 not having the ability to effectively deal with submarines, and with limited effective air defense systems

These are two different projects and their purpose is different!
And why did you decide that 22350 have failed PLO and air defense?

[venik]

Quote: Vl Nemchinov

M-70 FRU, in no way does it place the 22350 series, (on the contrary, it will only make it more efficient to engage in marine gas turbine engine building) because their power plants use M-90 FRU, i.e. other GTEs (!).

========
And at WHAT capacities are these (not yet under construction serially) will be producing, you DIDN'T THINK? Yes, at the same capacities of "Saturn"! Or do you naively think that if the M-70 FRU-2 is two times weaker than the M-90FR, then the timing of its production is also half as much? You are wrong - there is NO linear relationship!
------------

Quote: Vl Nemchinov

And structurally, the gearbox for the same gas turbine engine should be an order of magnitude simpler, for mass production, than for the power plant 22350 (where you have to "link the work" of diesels and gas turbine engines with different speeds) !!

=======
WHO told you that the gearboxes for M-70FRU-2 and M-90 FR are the same and have the same speed ??? Operating mode M-70FRU-2 - 7200 rpm, and for the M-90FR - only 3450 rpm (more than two times more!). And the power there is twice as different .... And how do you imagine the SAME gearboxes for these power plants ???

[Serg65]

Quote: Vl Nemchinov

it would be worth laying something like "Thunder"

There were already problems with weapons on Novik with its displacement, and you want to stick almost the same nomenclature on a ship one and a half times less!

[venik]

Quote: Serg65

There were already problems with weapons on Novik with its displacement, and you want to stick almost the same nomenclature on a ship one and a half times less!

========
Oh, Sergei! If only that was the case! There, the COGOG propulsion system itself was absolutely "vicious"! If on frigates 11356, with a displacement of 3620/4035 tons, the power plant of the COG typeAG with 4 turbines total capacity 34.5 thousand hp, provided a maximum / economic speed of 30/14 knots, then on the hapless "Thunder", the power plant COGОG, with 4 turbines with a total capacity of up to 37 thousand hp (i.e. on 7% larger) and a displacement of 2560/2900 tons (i.e. 30% (thirty !!!) percent less, develop almost the same maximum and cruising speeds !!!!!
Let's calculate such a parameter as the power-to-weight ratio - the ratio of the power of the propulsion unit to the displacement (let's take - the standard V / I. We get: 11356 - 9.5 hp / ton, and in 12441 - 14.5 hp / ton (!!!). Those. with a power-to-weight ratio of 1.5 times more, the near sea zone corvette 12441 has the same high-speed h-ki as the far sea zone frigate 11356 (!!!) What does this mean? Yes about that power plant corvette (12441), turned out to be more than one and a half (!) times less effective than that of a frigate !!!
PS Someone has already "minus" you. (Me, by the way - too!). I suspect that it is - "amateur 12441"... Well, God bless him! I tried to restore justice a little.

[Serg65]

Quote: venik

If only that was the case!

I did not expand the answer as much as you do!
Totally agree with you!

Quote: venik

Someone has already "minus" you. (Me, by the way - too!).

The fighters against the bloody Morder are working!

[Rubi0]

+ to everything at the plant, which built only empty buildings for the last decade until 2014 for the Turks without filling, no pipelines or electricians, nothing.

[mitrich]

and what, it justifies the snail's pace of building such a small vessel? When we shout profitably: the sanctions helped us, now we have our own everything! Or: we are under sanctions, but what did you want?
Here, as they say, either cowards or a cross.
And the rate of delivery of the British aircraft carrier to the mountains is impressive.

[TwilightElf]

it’s just that no one in the Gulf laid it down .. they are all built in Zelenograd .. and they were completed in Kerch. .like UDC)

[Normann]

And now we must all mourn our shipbuilding industry together?

[URAL72]

PATROL SHIP Laid down on 8 May 2016, launched on 29 January 2021 Also five years old.
"Impressive" however.

Likewise, Britain's military spending is impressive too. They are no less than Russian ones. Only the fleet is much more important for them than for us, so everything has been going according to plan there for more than one hundred years. And we only have 20 terrible disasters in the 3th century, not counting 1905.

[jovanni]

So you read it wrong! It is written: "The Ka-27PS helicopter will be based on board." So also an aircraft carrier ...

[TwilightElf]

there are a lot of things "provided" like modular. only instead of a modular one there is a sauna for the crew)) and there are no modules themselves and in order to install them. you must first disassemble half a trough))

[andrewkor]

And with the decommissioned Icelands for the Navy, there is no desire to compare?

[donavi49]

So you can compare Rook with Burke, what really.

Well, in general, there are several options now. First of all, these are the Hamiltons, the Americans are now giving them out to everyone (even Vietnam received 2 pieces). I did not follow, but if the ships remained, which is not a fact, then it may still be possible to beg for them.

Well, and Comandanti - they are going to put them up for sale after 25 years. Well, here's the minus that Italy is not in a hurry to supply weapons, even for money. Probably some thread of the UAE will go to the Haftar Navy or to Egypt, or somewhere else.

[bk316]

When a ship is accepted into the navy, one should not whine, but rejoice, otherwise, as they said in ancient times. "He died because he came out of bile."

[mitrich]

it's like ukroshumer rubber boats are happy? Then yes, what a joy!

[askort154]

The fourth patrol ship of project 22160 "Sergei Kotov", built at the Kerch shipyard "Zaliv", is completing testing.

The Zaliv plundered by Ukraine returned home in 2014. For 7 years, not only recovered, but also built 4 ships. And they are building something else there.
Well done! Good luck to the shipbuilders!

[next322]

Quote: knn54

It is interesting to build (and repair) ships for the Pacific Fleet in Crimea.

and many ships for the Pacific Fleet were built and repaired at the plant? In August 2014, the plant from the ownership of ukrooligarch Zhvania became the property of the Russian Federation, so there was no raider takeover.

[tralflot1832]

Since the end of 2014, the plant has been managed by the Ak Bars shipbuilding company. The plant has come to life, a conveyor with a carrying capacity of 400 tons has finally been bought. The roof of two workshops is being repaired without stopping production of 26 thousand square meters. not very informative. Everything has to be looked for sideways.

[knn54]

Alex, at least read CAREFULLY. There was such a decision, for which we purchased the equipment. And where else are these ships of the ocean zone needed (except for the Pacific Fleet) ???
And how do you react to the fact that abroad (including in Ukraine, but such enterprises remain) will begin to take away the property of Russian oligarchs?

[zadorin1974]

Good Nikolai. Sorry to get into your conversation, but it would have been great if our thief in the west had their investments blocked. They wouldn’t have anything left to carry home at the pace of a waltz. You need to invest in your country, not rob it.

[next322]

[quote = knn54]. And where else are these ships of the oceanic zone needed (except for the Pacific Fleet) ???
laid down 2 cable ships for the Northern Fleet and the Pacific Fleet, 2 patrolmen 22160, 3 karakuturta 22800 for the Black Sea Fleet and 2 UDC 23900 for the Pacific Fleet and the Black Sea Fleet ... they are needed in all fleets

[bk316]

And how do you react to the fact that abroad (including in Ukraine, but such enterprises remain) will begin to take away the property of Russian oligarchs?

What's the question! You, like many here on VO, will react positively if you start to take away the property of Russian oligarchs EVEN IN RUSSIA!

[Victorio]

Quote: knn54

No one robbed the plant, but in August 2014, a group of "comrades" from Moscow, with the support of "Self-Defense of Crimea", carried out a raider seizure, paralyzing the work of the enterprise.
The production was modernized by installing the purchased equipment for the construction of UDC / helicopter carriers.
It is interesting to build (and repair) ships for the Pacific Fleet in Crimea.

===
Well, at least those people work, plus orders.

[askort154]

knn54 ....No one robbed the plant, but in August 2014, a group of "comrades" from Moscow, with the support of "Self-Defense of Crimea", carried out a raider seizure, paralyzing the work of the enterprise.

The last years of being in Ukraine, the plant changed several owners. At the time of moving to Russia, the plant had no orders, it was in a critical condition. Fixed assets and technical equipment were in need of repair. It was only in September 2014 that the plant fully recovered. Loaded in full, the workers are back. Made a great contribution to the construction of the Crimean bridge, etc. (I do not use minuses)

[knn54]

Alexander, you contradict yourself. In August the plant changed its owner, and in September it was COMPLETELY restored.
From the "critical state" described in the commentary, the situation cannot be corrected in a month.

[sledak]

I support, and the comparison with "Cooney Elizabeth" is inappropriate here!

[donavi49]

Two. The first Zeleny Dol did, and on the Gulf they only returned everything that was removed for the passage of the Volga-Don, and also carried out tests.

[bk316]

Yes, you are right (well, except that "Zeleny Dol" is a railway station in Zelenodolsk, it is unlikely that ships are made there ) and therefore this is an even greater reason for the celebration.
Now the plant is working ...

[lvov_aleksey]

Quote: donavi49

Two. The first Zeleny Dol did, and on the Gulf they only returned everything that was removed for the passage of the Volga-Don, and also carried out tests.

[lvov_aleksey]

Quote: lvov_aleksey

Quote: donavi49

Two. The first Zeleny Dol did, and on the Gulf they only returned everything that was removed for the passage of the Volga-Don, and also carried out tests.

The entire series is intended for the Black Sea Fleet, the first three ships are already in service, two more are being completed in Zelenodolsk.
where does the Zeleny Dol, find such a city on the Volga at the beginning.
Zelenodolsk it has its own history

[TatarinSSSR]

In a modern tense situation, the PSKR FPS of the FSB of the Russian Federation should be the size of a frigate, develop a speed of at least 35 knots, with a helicopter and be armed with anti-ship missiles with a range of 10-200 km, with a salvo of 4 missiles. Plus a strong body with a reinforced rim for "bulk" and rapid-fire guns of 30-130 mm., And at least the "Redut" air defense system or similar. In general, fast, strong, toothy. So that any guests who are not asked to be seriously frightened.

[Protos]

Great boat!
The crew, by the way, is 29 people with 80 places in the cabins.
Phenomenal autonomy of 60-80 days, excellent seaworthiness and very comfortable conditions for the crew, MT, PDSS, etc.
Our Black Sea pr. 22160 spend 250 days a year on hikes!
And this is even the boards on our DRRA-6000!

[Protos]

Quote: knn54

The construction of the AIR CARRIER "Queen Elizabeth" has been carried out in the UK since 2009. In July 2014, the ship was launched.
PATROL SHIP Laid down on 8 May 2016, launched on 29 January 2021 Also five years old.
"Impressive," however.

Is this the current that they are forced to lease to the pindos in between repairs and the installation of a new fire extinguishing system instead of a non-working one?