"Millions of people are evacuated for decades": presented a report on the consequences of possible missile strikes on nuclear facilities in the Middle East

25

Akkuyu NPP construction in Turkey

The American Non-Proliferation Policy Center (NPEC) presented an analysis of the possible risks of missile strikes against nuclear facilities (primarily power plants) in the Middle East. The experts who made it up warn: if a missile strike is struck at some of the nuclear energy infrastructure facilities, people will not be able to live in this territory for several decades due to the peculiarities of the Middle East climate and landscape. It will be an incredible humanitarian catastrophe.

Where nuclear power plants are being built in the Middle East


Despite the fact that many countries in the Middle East are interested in the construction and development of nuclear power plants, American experts warn that it is madness as long as the region remains a global "hot spot". Now the UAE has its own nuclear power plant, the construction of nuclear power plants is underway in Turkey and Iran, Egypt is going to build a nuclear power plant with four reactors in El Dabaa on the Mediterranean coast. Saudi Arabia and Jordan have announced their nuclear energy ambitions.



Meanwhile, we must not forget that all the listed countries are within the reach of missiles that can be launched not only and not so much by hostile states as by terrorist groups operating in the Middle East and not having any special deterrent factors. For example, the same Houthis can attack nuclear facilities in the UAE or, if they appear, in Saudi Arabia.

So, in September 2019, missiles of the Yemeni Houthis broke through the air defense system of Saudi Arabia and hit the Saudi Aramco oil facilities in Hurais and Abqaik. As a result of the Houthi attack, the production of about 50% of the Saudi kingdom's oil was temporarily interrupted. Will the information on the great ecological and humanitarian danger prevent the Houthis from launching the same attack against a nuclear facility, if necessary? The question is open.

What will be the consequences of strikes on nuclear power plants


American scientists are most concerned about the consequences of the penetration of the used nuclear power plant cesium-137 (Cs-137) into the atmosphere. Eva Lisowski, one of the authors of the report, warns that due to the release of cesium, several hundred thousand people, or rather millions, will have to leave their homes and not return to their homes for several decades. The half-life of cesium, to put it mildly, is not fast.


Mandatory and voluntary evacuation card in the event of strikes against nuclear power plants in the Middle East

In the report, four sites were selected to analyze the consequences of a possible missile strike: the Barakah nuclear power plant in the UAE, Bushehr in Iran, the Akkuyu nuclear power plant under construction in Turkey and Egypt's planned nuclear power plant in El Dabaa. It should be understood that this is not a complete list of nuclear facilities in the Middle East, real and potential. For example, for some reason, the report did not touch upon the reactors of the Shimon Peres Nuclear Research Center in Israel.

Especially dangerous, according to the authors of the report, are strikes on tanks with spent nuclear fuel. Considering the amount of spent nuclear fuel stored in such tanks, the impact of the impact will be several times greater than that of the reactor itself.

For example, if one of the three scenarios of an attack on SNF tanks from the Barakah NPP in the UAE is realized, 4 million mandatory and up to 8 million voluntary evacuations will have to evacuations. Roughly the same indicators - and in the case of potential strikes on other nuclear power plants.

How to prevent such risks, the report does not indicate, since it is devoted only to an analysis of the consequences of strikes. But many countries that provide assistance to the Middle Eastern states in the construction of nuclear power facilities, according to American experts, should think about what dangers this can lead to in the global "hot spot".

Considering that Russian companies are directly involved in the construction of nuclear power plants in Iran and Turkey, it is quite understandable against whom (including) this American report with notes of alarmism is directed and why it does not mention other countries in the region with nuclear infrastructure ...
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    9 December 2021 14: 40
    And those who will fire at atomic objects will not live or exploit the occupied territories? That is why articles from this series are nonsense and never will be.
    1. -2
      9 December 2021 14: 46
      "Millions of people are evacuated for decades": presented a report on the consequences of possible missile strikes on nuclear facilities in the Middle East

      lol In the Middle East, except for Israel and Turkey, no one cares about the broad masses. Nobody will evacuate them. And the Arabs themselves, until they are presented with samples of radiation in kind, will not run anywhere.
      1. +1
        9 December 2021 23: 56
        It depends very much where the wind will blow.
        So it is unrealistic to predict in advance.
        Evacuation is also unrealistic.
        Only the rich will leave. The rest will stay.
      2. +2
        10 December 2021 10: 33
        Burnout. Israel doesn't give a damn about the broad masses! Only a Zionist can say that. If for a second there was an opportunity to destroy neighbors with impunity, then the Israelis would not leave anything alive for thousands of kilometers around. Exclusively caring for the broad masses.
    2. -1
      9 December 2021 14: 51
      Well, after such attacks, these terrorists in the desert will be buried in the sand up to their necks and the herd of camels will be driven away. It's like in a movie I want to take over the world by destroying the planet.
    3. +1
      10 December 2021 13: 57
      Look closely at the map. There is no one country. There are nuclear power plants on its territory, but there are no hypothetical attacks on them. They do not intend to seize and exploit, they want to surround themselves with deserted lands. In the future, after tens of years, quietly paddle them.
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +3
    9 December 2021 14: 45
    Why is only considered
    Near East?
    ICBMs target dozens of countries where
    Hundreds of reactors have been built, operating and spent, and where there are plenty of spent fuel storage facilities.
    Instead of hitting cities, it's easy to hit reactors.
    Nuclear power plants are very effective, but at the same time very dangerous in terms of missile or bomb attacks.
    1. +2
      9 December 2021 14: 58
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Why is only considered
      Near East?
      This is for the Merikatos.
      Considering that the construction of nuclear power plants in Iran and Turkey is directly related to Russian companies, it is quite clear against whom (including) sent this American report with notes of alarmism
      hi
    2. +2
      9 December 2021 15: 03
      voyaka uh .....Why is only considered
      Near East?


      The answer to this question is in the last paragraph of the article. hi
    3. +5
      9 December 2021 16: 41
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Why is only considered
      Near East?

      Maybe because your compatriots, even here on the website, did not hesitate to talk about possible attacks on Iran's nuclear weapons.
    4. +1
      9 December 2021 17: 21
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Nuclear power plants are very effective, but at the same time very dangerous in terms of missile or bomb attacks.

      That is why there are operators replacing each other around the clock, and they are duplicated by an electronic protection system, so that in the case you described, shut down the reactor and then even direct hits are not afraid of it, although the protection of the reactor itself is very powerful there.
    5. 0
      9 December 2021 18: 32
      Only on condition that bombs or missiles are designed to destroy underground objects: i.e. with a high degree of penetration or very high power. And that's not a fact. I saw with my own eyes the process of pouring the reactor vessel: there is a monolithic RC of such thickness that it was poured without stopping for several weeks.
  4. +6
    9 December 2021 14: 45
    In general, this is one of the very few cases when I am inclined to agree with mattress mats .. There is nothing for nuclear technologies to do in those parts. And the region is extremely unstable, and the curvature of the people there is well known. They will blow up what - and who will be to blame? Well, aren't they? You can't put such dangerous things into the clutches of such characters ..
    1. +1
      9 December 2021 16: 28
      these are already the problems of those who build them on their territory, they must calculate all the risks, including in relations with neighboring countries, if they are building our projects, we can well offer them and air defense systems to protect these nuclear power plants
  5. +10
    9 December 2021 14: 53
    -For example, the report for some reason did not touch upon the reactors of the Shimon Peres Nuclear Research Center in Israel.
    ... it is quite clear who (including) this American report is directed against
    "Armenian radio" remembered something:
    - Which city is the most beautiful?
    - Of course, Yerevan.
    - Which city is the biggest?
    - Of course, Yerevan.
    - How many atomic bombs are needed to destroy Yerevan?
    - Tbilisi is also a beautiful city.
  6. +2
    9 December 2021 15: 09
    why does it not mention other countries in the region with nuclear infrastructure ...
    The report was drawn up by the Americans, therefore, they considered that it was not worth scaring their "allies". It is embarrassing that an emphasis is being placed on Iran, which can be struck not by some terrorists, but by two officially existing countries, and they have already struck at Iranian targets and not only cyber. Usually the appearance of such reasoning, reports occurs to probe public opinion when planning such strikes.
  7. +3
    9 December 2021 15: 49
    For example, if one of the three scenarios of an impact on the SNF tanks of the Barakah NPP in the UAE is implemented, 4 million mandatory and up to 8 million voluntary evacuations will have to be carried out.

    Interestingly, American scientists and Eva Lisovski did not calculate the scenarios for the American nuclear power plant Palo Verde or Donald Cook?
    And put all this in the open press to the people of the United States, and what would they do with Senator Roger Wicker?
  8. +2
    9 December 2021 15: 57
    Wow. And now, right like this, can you set targets for terrorists? Through the media with analysis and diagrams? Cool...
  9. 0
    9 December 2021 16: 54
    As far as I understand, you just can't get to the reactor. The building in which it is located must withstand the fall of a large plane on it. And terrorists with an RPG or a gas bolon are too tough ...
  10. 0
    9 December 2021 17: 18
    For some reason, the report did not touch upon the reactors of the Shimon Peres Nuclear Research Center in Israel.
    I wonder why this is? These one-sided studies are usually commissioned. The West has lost the technologies for the safe construction of nuclear power plants and the production of TVELs, hence the green energy, and research into the consequences of strikes on nuclear power plants. Hmyri!
  11. +3
    9 December 2021 17: 45
    One country that has bombed nuclear facilities in Iran comes to mind. Apparently this country does not know about the forecasts of an atomic winter and hopes that they will not be hooked.
  12. 0
    9 December 2021 18: 21
    "Millions of people are evacuated for decades": presented a report on the consequences of possible missile strikes on nuclear facilities in the Middle East
    ... I don't even want to think about this, because it is SCARY ... but you will have to think and increased security measures will not be superfluous. Alas, that's the only way, now.
  13. 0
    9 December 2021 18: 26
    The author should, in addition to this question, ask himself about the disclosure of the problem of physical protection of such objects. Apparently, a person does not have a very good idea of ​​the active and passive safety systems of nuclear power plants.
  14. +2
    9 December 2021 18: 48
    Only the Jews in this region have the ability to bang out a vigorous bomb. And they don't give a damn about the lives and opinions of others.
  15. 0
    10 December 2021 01: 12
    The EU's message? Like experts will announce the attack of the Houthis (who saw them?) On the SNF storage facility and Germany "open the gate and the wallet"!
    "Voluntary evacuation" - in general, the term touched. Yes, everyone there would voluntarily evacuate to those countries that "feed the animals" even tomorrow.