December 9 - Day of the Heroes of the Fatherland in Russia

Today Russia celebrates a relatively "young" holiday - Heroes of the Fatherland Day. This is a solemn day when the country honors the heroes of the present and pays tribute to the memory of the heroes of the past. Moreover, these are not necessarily heroes in the sense that such people directly have this status and have a gold star. Heroes are in a much broader sense of the word. These are those who went to the enemy in the snow near Moscow in 1941, and those who fought international terrorism in the North Caucasus in the 1990-2000s, and those who today in the "red zones" of Russian hospitals are saving lives by overcoming accumulated fatigue, truly sacrificing yourself.

The President of the country congratulated all those worthy of this title on the Day of Heroes of the Fatherland.

In his address, Vladimir Putin noted the character of the entire people, which at all times and epochs had resisted encroachments on their native land, noted those who helped and continue to help withstand the most difficult trials.

The President pointed out that the holiday is inextricably linked with the Russian history, marking the many exploits of their ancestors and contemporaries.

Vladimir Putin stressed that the threat can be truly weighty, cruel, merciless, but the defenders of the Fatherland have shown courage and courage at all times.

The president:

This was the case in 1812, on the fronts of the First World War and the Great Patriotic War.

Separately, the head of state appreciated the work of medical workers who save people, despite the direct threat to their own life and health.

For your information:

Heroes of the Fatherland Day was established in 2007 as a holiday in Russia. In fact, it has a reference to such a pre-revolutionary holiday as the Day of the Knights of St. George, which was celebrated in December. The holiday is associated with the establishment of the Order of St. George in 1769 by Catherine II. In the Russian Empire, it was this order that was the highest military award for military merit. The ribbon of this order is usually called St. George's.

Comments

[Murmur 55]

Eternal memory to the sons and daughters of the Fatherland who gave their lives for the Fatherland.

[Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov]

***
From the heroes of bygone days
Sometimes there are no names left.
Those who have taken mortal combat
They became just earth and grass.
Only their terrible valor
Settled in the hearts of the living
This eternal fire,
We bequeathed one,
We keep in our chest ...

Evgeny Agranovich
***

[tatra]

Based on the "history" of their country and people, the enemies of the communists who seized the republics of the USSR have all their "heroes" anti-Soviet and Russophobic. They praise them, erect monuments to them, like Kolchak, Krasnov, Bandera, the murderer of Chapaev.

[ODERVIT]

Happy Heroes of the Fatherland Day !!!
Glory and memory for centuries.

[Skipper]

Americans have heroes only in Hollywood false propaganda, and in Russia, no matter how it is called at a certain point in time, heroes are an everyday reality.
at the time of the feat of Mary was 20 years old. Place - near Sevastopol 1942 ...

[impostor]

Those who received the title of Hero for the cause cause sincere respect and reverence, a deep bow to them. But those who received it without performing a feat, a heroic deed, without special posters, then excuse me.

[75 Sergey]

It is a pity that now there are people among the Heroes who received an award for some unclear outstanding service ... Maybe I don't understand why

[Pereira]

Not only.

[75 Sergey]

And also here

Interestingly, but is it possible somehow without these?

[Pereira]

I suspect not. Can't those in power reward each other with Iron Crosses? The electorate will not understand.

[75 Sergey]

A pity, then everything would fall into place.

[Brother]

You look and disgusting! be aware.
Elementary degradation of the very concept of "Hero"
Hmm .. so they (those in power), let's say, will gather, say, drink beer, discuss the promotion of their "business" in nature ... and tripping over a branch or a stone just reward themselves with special rewards for the fact that they gathered, played tricks and stumbled not in Kushaveli or Bali ... but wherever it is on the Klyazma!

[Andrey Student]

beautiful photoshop. photo of the decree on rewarding in the studio

[75 Sergey]

Yes, indeed, it is a pity to delete it will not work.

[75 Sergey]

Yes, the hike is really crap.
This Serdyukov is not a hero, a different hero and by right, but this simple-minded one, and the star has been photographed.

[Brother]

Hmm ... and in the heroes of Russia - the star of the Hero of the Soviet Union ?!
USSR .. this is one thing, but a murderer and just a traitor to the Soviet Union, an alcoholic and concurrently the president of the Russian Federation, unable to rule the WHOLE country ... hmm ... divided it into principalities ... and this is completely different!

[Andrey Moskvin]

A psychological reference to the significance of the former award, I think. Hero of the Soviet Union - sounds. Hero of the Fatherland - something vague.

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Andrey Moskvin

Hero of the Fatherland - something vague.

They had to institute an award: "Hero of United Russia" ... We would understand everything ...
The Path is told that whatever - a person cannot be a hero, whose deed is unknown, whose merits are embarrassed to disclose ...

[Olgovich]

In fact, it has a reference to such a pre-revolutionary holiday as the Day of the Knights of St. George, which was celebrated in December. The holiday is associated with the establishment of the Order of St. George in 1769 by Catherine II. In the Russian Empire, it was this order that was the highest military award for military merit. The ribbon of this order is usually called St. George's.

Continuity of traditions is the basis of patriotic education, so this is a wonderful holiday.

[tatra]

What kind of "continuity" can you have, enemies of the communists? For you, the entire centuries-old history of the Russian State, and the USSR, is only a benefit to justify your capture of the USSR.
You don't give a damn about all the heroes of pre-revolutionary Russia; you have slandered and insulted Soviet heroes, including Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya. After the seizure of the USSR, you yourself have devalued the value of state awards and the concept of "hero".

[Olgovich]

Quote: tatra

What kind of "continuity" can you have, enemies of the communists? For you, the entire centuries-old history of the Russian State, and the USSR -it's just a benefit to justify the capture by you THE USSR .

In Russian express your so-called try "thought", "enemy of the communists": what is the benefit of justification from ... centuries of history, what nonsense?

Quote: tatra

On all the heroes of pre-revolutionary Russia you do not careah, Soviet heroes, including Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya, you slandered, insulted

Confirm your false slanderous accusations with FACTS (About Zoe, etc.), lover of lies. Otherwise, who are you?

What? You can not? No.

Shame ...

[Dart2027]

Quote: tatra

For you, the entire centuries-old history of the Russian State, and the USSR, is only a benefit to justify your capture of the USSR

And why did I ask the USSR to declare itself the successor to the military glory of Russia?

[Mavrikiy]

Quote: Olgovich

Continuity of traditions is the basis of patriotic education, so this is a wonderful holiday.

"From the beginning money, then chairs" From the beginning, return the Motherland, then we will count the heroes ...

We spoke in the days of Batu,
As in the fields of Borodin:
May Russia be magnified
May our names disappear!

(Tyutchev, who does not know)

[paul3390]

There can be no patriotism, especially mass patriotism, in a country that no longer belongs to us. Fatherland is what people get from their fathers, from their grandfathers. So what did we get? No - if a person considers himself to be a patriot, then his main task is to return to people everything stolen from them by a thief. By reviving Soviet power. Otherwise - he's just d ..., uh-uh, stupid character.

[Olgovich]

Quote: paul3390

So what did we get?

Fatherland. The same as grandfathers and fathers.

Quote: paul3390

if a person considers himself a patriot, then his main task is to return to people everything stolen from them by a thief. Reviving Soviet power

Soviet power has not existed for a thousand years and is not, but the Fatherland was a thousand years old and is.

And his best sons fought and died for him on the Kulikovo field, in the Battle of the Ice, near Molody, Poltava, Borodino, Izmail, Azov, Osovets, Galician and Kursk battles.

These are just FACTS.

[paul3390]

Empty words. Who owns this Fatherland now? Should we? Do not make me laugh. You want to go to fight for someone else's property - a drum on your neck. I personally - prefer to fight in order to return to people the legacy of their fathers.

A fatherland worth fighting for was sold in 1991.

[Olgovich]

Quote: paul3390

Empty words.

Empty words .

Quote: paul3390

Who owns this Fatherland now? Should we?

Yes. From 888 to the present day.

Quote: paul3390

You want to go to fight for someone else's property - a drum on your neck. I personally - would prefer to fight in order to return it to people

Those. at the next coming of the Germans you will go to the policemen and the army of the enemy. And you will not be left with any other choice: either there or there.

Quote: paul3390

A fatherland worth fighting for was sold in 1991.

Let me remind you that the "pegedian" otgyad numbering 18 million, in 1991, fled instantly and without resistance, like cockroaches with the lights on in the kitchen. And no one stood up for them, for their power.

For the Fatherland, regardless of the system (feudalism, capitalism, socialism) people got up for a thousand years without interruption.

These are just FACTS.

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: Olgovich

Those. at the next coming of the Germans you will go to the policemen and the army of the enemy.

Serving foreign invaders, inviting them to fight with arms against their own people is the lot of your like-minded people Krasnov, Kolchak and other traitors to their people.

Quote: Olgovich

For the Fatherland, regardless of the system (feudalism, capitalism, socialism), people stood up for a thousand years without interruption.

The best sons of the fatherland not only fought for their country, but also perished at the hands of your like-minded people, defending their people. And your like-minded people, having plundered and pilfered a great country, hide behind false patriotism, continuing to plunder and sell their country to foreign corporations.

[Olgovich]

Quote: aleksejkabanets

Serving foreign invaders, inviting them to fight with weapons against their own people is the lot of your like-minded people ..

To serve faithfully to foreign invaders is the lot of your like-minded Ulyanovs and other similar traitors to their people - NOBODY and NEVER gave their lands forever to the invaders, like these traitors in Brest betrayal to their German-Turkish masters

Quote: aleksejkabanets

... And your like-minded people, having plundered and pilfered a great country, hide behind false patriotism, continuing to plunder and sell their country to foreign corporations.

your Russophobes cut off 5 million km2 from Russia and turned the cut off lands into 15 states -Anti-Russia-Russia did not know large losses. The boundaries of the 17th century are their full merit

Because of them, the Russian Donbass is not in Russia today and is forced to fight in the so-called. Ukraine, created by your Russophobes in the Russian lands of New Russia and Slobozhanshchina.

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: Olgovich

Serving faithfully to foreign invaders is the lot of your .......

So Krasnov and Kolchak are your associates, aren't they?

Quote: Olgovich

NOBODY and NEVER gave their lands forever to the invaders

The Peace of Brest-Litovsk is the payment for the defeat in the First World War and the natural result of the reign of Nicholas II, the defeat of the thoroughly rotten feudal tsarist regime and the comprador bourgeois Provisional Government. By the way, the communists later returned almost everything, with the exception of Poland, and that after the Second World War was returned to the orbit of the USSR.

Quote: Olgovich

your Russophobes cut off 5 million km2 from Russia and turned the cut off lands into 15 states -Anti-Russia

Stop lashing out from a sore head to a healthy one. The Bolsheviks made from the prison of nations - the tsarist Republic of Ingushetia, a common state, with equal rights for all peoples. It was your like-minded people who ruined ONE COMMON STATE into 15 estates, so that it would be easier to plunder 15 peoples and now set these peoples against each other, and you are faithfully serving them with your lies. V.I. Lenin has a good saying:
"No one is to blame if he was born a slave; but a slave who not only shuns the pursuit of his freedom, but justifies and embellishes his slavery ..... such a slave is a lackey and boor who causes a legitimate feeling of indignation, contempt and disgust. . "

Quote: Olgovich

Because of them, the Russian Donbass is not in Russia today and is forced to fight in the so-called. Ukraine, created by your Russophobes in the Russian lands of New Russia and Slobozhanshchina.

And again you are lying! Any adequate person understands that Donbass, like Kiev, like Brest, like Riga, etc. ended up in different states as a result of the coming to power of your, Ol'govich, like-minded people, the same as you are the ideological heirs of Kolchak, Krasnov, Yudenich and other underdeveloped ...

[Dart2027]

Quote: aleksejkabanets

Stop lashing out from a sore head to a healthy one. The Bolsheviks made from the prison of nations - the tsarist Republic of Ingushetia, a common state, with equal rights for all peoples.

In a more understandable language, the Bolsheviks are analogous to the modern BLM.

Quote: aleksejkabanets

Any adequate person understands that Donbass, like Kiev, like Brest, like Riga, etc. ended up in different states as a result

the creation of these states by Comrade Ulyanov.

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: Dart2027

In a more understandable language, the Bolsheviks are analogous to the modern BLM.

How is it? Can you substantiate this pearl?

Quote: Dart2027

the creation of these states by Comrade Ulyanov.

You don't know history well. Lenin created neither the Baltic states, nor Ukraine, nor Armenia, nor Finland, nor Poland, etc.
But it’s good that at least you don’t dispute the rest of the commentary.

[Dart2027]

Quote: aleksejkabanets

Can you substantiate this pearl?

Quote: aleksejkabanets

The Bolsheviks made from the prison of nations - Tsarist Republic of Ingushetia, a common state

We replace RI with white and you will not tell.

Quote: aleksejkabanets

Lenin created neither the Baltic states, nor Ukraine, nor Armenia, nor Finland, nor Poland, etc.

And who was distributing independence there? Well, will you show the state of Ukraine until 1917?

Quote: aleksejkabanets

But it’s good that at least you don’t dispute the rest of the commentary.

Quote: aleksejkabanets

Peace of Brest-Litovsk - payment for defeat in World War I

Thanks to the traitors who destroyed the country. Thank you for reminding me.

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: Dart2027

Thanks to the traitors who destroyed the country. Thank you for reminding me.

Yes, only these traitors were in the highest echelons of power in the Russian Empire, and not the Bolsheviks. Or do you think the Bolsheviks overthrew the same Nikolashka?

Quote: Dart2027

And who was distributing independence there? Well, will you show the state of Ukraine until 1917?

Your associate B.N. Yeltsin, "Take as much sovereignty as you want", his words? The state of Ukraine took shape as an independent territory until October 1917. Read the documents about the Brest-Litovsk Peace, at least in it the state of Ukraine, hostile to the RSFSR, played its negative role. In general, read the article by V.I. Lenin's "On the national pride of the Great Russians", in general, it can be used to judge his (Lenin's) views on the national question. Read Stalin's works, he wrote a lot about the national question. All nationalities should have equal rights, shouldn't they?

Quote: Dart2027

We replace RI with white and you will not tell.

Could you explain yourself more clearly, it is not at all clear what you wanted to say by that.

[Dart2027]

Quote: aleksejkabanets

Yes, only these traitors were in the highest echelons of power in the Russian Empire, and not the Bolsheviks.

As in the USSR.

Quote: aleksejkabanets

The state of Ukraine took shape as an independent territory until October 1917.

And they represented territories in which no one really knew what was happening with a bunch of lords-atamans. But a full-fledged state with everything necessary is Lenin.

Quote: aleksejkabanets

All nationalities should have equal rights, shouldn't they?

That is, when people are forced to become Ukrainians, are they like equal rights?

Quote: aleksejkabanets

Could you explain yourself more clearly, it is not at all clear what you wanted to say by that.

Quote: Dart2027

In a more understandable language, the Bolsheviks are analogous to the modern BLM.

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: Dart2027

As in the USSR.

Yes, as in the late USSR.

Quote: Dart2027

And they represented territories in which no one really knew what was happening with a bunch of lords-atamans. But a full-fledged state with everything necessary is Lenin.

Quote: Dart2027

That is, when people are forced to become Ukrainians, are they like equal rights?

Read Lenin's article about which I wrote, you will understand his views on the national question more clearly, maybe then you will stop writing some savagery.

Quote: Dart2027

Quote: aleksejkabanets
Could you explain yourself more clearly, it is not at all clear what you wanted to say by that.

Quote: Dart2027
In a more understandable language, the Bolsheviks are analogous to the modern BLM.

So you will justify this statement of yours or not?

[Dart2027]

Quote: aleksejkabanets

Read the article by Lenin, about which I wrote, you will understand more about his views on

which consist in a terry Russophobia. Yes, I read.

Quote: aleksejkabanets

So you will justify this statement of yours or not?

Quote: Dart2027

We replace RI with white and you will not tell.

[Olgovich]

Quote: aleksejkabanets

The state of Ukraine took shape as an independent territory until October 1917.

"State" "as an independent territory" is that nonsense?

Savchenko, ukrrrnatsioanlist history:

Despite the self-declaration of autonomy of Ukraine, back in June 1917, this autonomy did not actually exist until the end of October 1917, since real power in the so-called Southwestern provinces of Russia was held by the Provisional Government of the Russian Republic.

Only with the fall of the Provisional Government in Petrograd did the possibility of the transition of the entire the fullness of power in Ukraine in the hands of the Central Rada.

The state of the UPR was announced only AFTER the thief, as

And his independence, which the Bolsheviks RECOGNIZED.

And find out, finally, that it was the Bolsheviks who created the Soviets of the Baltic republics and recognized their independence in 1918.

Quote: aleksejkabanets

Read the documents about the Brest-Litovsk Peace, at least in it the state of Ukraine, hostile to the RSFSR, with

WHO dragged ukraine to brest, again you don’t know?

[Olgovich]

Quote: aleksejkabanets

So Krasnov and Kolchak are your associates, aren't they?

your national traitors, the Ulyanovs, gave their masters, the German occupiers, a third of European Russia FOREVER. Eliminated your betrayal in Brest Entente

Krasnov is convicted, Kolchak is the supreme ruler of Russia, under which the Russians Odessa, Verny, Guryev remained Russian, and not as with national traitors, in Anti-Russia, the USSR, the USSR, etc.

Quote: aleksejkabanets

Peace of Brest-Litovsk - payment for defeat in World War I

The "defeat" of Russia in PV exists only in sick heads. Russophobes: NOBODY in the world, except for these traitors and their German traitors, Brest did not recognize. And Russia, according to Versailles, had ALL rights to reparations, like the victorious countries.

Quote: aleksejkabanets

By the way, the communists later returned almost everything, with the exception of Poland, and that after the Second World War was returned to the orbit of the USSR.

TO WHOM did it "return"? you look at the borders of Russia (RF, RSFSR), there is nothing returned there, except for a miserable half sakhalin. And the anti-Russian Ussrs are of no interest to anyone.

Quote: aleksejkabanets

Stop lashing out from a sore head to a healthy one. The Bolsheviks made from the prison of nations - the tsarist Republic of Ingushetia, a common state, with equal rights for all peoples.

in your "equal" country, Russians lived five times worse than Georgians (check our VO!), etc., being powerless, ruthlessly ripped off cash cow

Quote: aleksejkabanets

It was your like-minded people who ruined ONE COMMON STATE into 15 lands,

ignorant liars just need to KNOW at least their own owls. so-called the 1977 constitution, which states that republics are SOVEREIGN STATES WITH THE RIGHT OF WITHDRAWAL. ... Which they did.

Quote: aleksejkabanets

V.I. Lenin has a good saying:

"Mom, send MONEY !!" - wrote already bald overage parasite from Paris, sitting tightly on the neck of the pensioner.

And the soviet peasants became slaves, whom you bridled to corvee, quitrent and tied to the land, not giving them any state pensions, no sick leave, or almost money for hard labor

Quote: aleksejkabanets

And again you are lying! Any adequate person understands that Donbass, like Kiev, like Brest, like Riga, etc. ended up in different states as a result of the coming to power of your

: read the 1977 constitution - there are specified sovereign stateswhere are your traitors by force RUSSIANS stuffed Odessa, Nikolaev, etc. And only for this reason Russians are burned and killed there.

WHO gave you the right to rape them in the Ussr, the BSSR, in what referendums did the people themselves decide?

If the boundaries were "conditional", no differencewhy did not leave them in the RSFSR?

Quote: aleksejkabanets

as a result of the coming to power of your underdogs,

shortcomings - they scattered like cockroaches, in 1991, prsrv everything: their party, ideology, country, etc., etc.

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: Olgovich

in your "equal" country, Russians lived five times worse than Georgians (check our VO!), etc., being powerless, ruthlessly ripped off cash cow

Today the Russians have nothing, neither their own state, nor their government, the Chechens have, the Dagestanis have, the Circassians have, but the Russians do not, and soon they will be banned from mentioning their nationality. The rest of your nonsense, from both comments, I don't even want to disassemble, all this has been chewed here at IN a hundred to five hundred times, and you still carry this nonsense. You and your like-minded people will finish in exactly the same way as in 1917-18, and in the same way you will shout "And what are we for?" Do you want blood? You will achieve it, only then blame yourself.

[Olgovich]

Quote: aleksejkabanets

Today Russians have nothing, no state of their own,

it is sick Russophobes today do not have their own state where they ripped off the Russians and Russia as sticky.

Quote: aleksejkabanets

The rest of your nonsense, from both comments, I don't even want to disassemble, all this has been chewed here at IN a hundred to five hundred times, and you still carry this nonsense.

You are given the indisputable FACTS of the demographic material and territorial robbery and ruin of Russia, to which, in response, only an incoherent empty BOLTOVNYA

Quote: aleksejkabanets

You, with your like-minded people finish in the same way as in 1917-18, and in the same way you will shout "And what about us?" Do you want blood? You will achieve it, only then blame yourself.

your complete bankruptcy already themselves ended, rotted, decayed, stinked and disappeared.

It's always funny when the next potential hangers of people are firmly convinced that it will be they who will hang, and not them.

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: Olgovich

it is sick Russophobes today do not have their own state where they ripped off the Russians and Russia as sticky.

Find me the "Russian Republic" on the map, so far I only see the "Republic of Dagestan", "The Republic of Adygea", etc. I'm pretty fed up with your distortion of facts.
Threat And then there is nothing to answer, that's such a misfortune.

[Olgovich]

Quote: aleksejkabanets

Find me the "Russian Republic" on the map, so far I only see the "Republic of Dagestan", "The Republic of Adygea", etc. I'm pretty fed up with your distortion of facts.
Threat And then there is nothing to answer, that's such a misfortune.

open ANY map of the world and find RUSSIA on it.

And for 70 years such a country on the world map DIDN'T EXIST.

And all sorts of "autonomous republics of the Caucasus", along with the allied ones, created your Russophobes on the body of Russia.

Before them, in normal Russia, there was the Terek region, where they lived and thrived Russian Terek Cossacks and peasants, which are yours, with the red highlanders together, cut, robbed, burned and evicted with the kids to the north.

You will find out, at last, WHAT is, in the basis, Samashki, where there were terrible battles in the Chechen wars, Alkhan-Kala, Zakan-yurt 9, the villages of Samshkinskaya, Romanovskaya, etc.) and so on: just a hundred years ago RUSSIAN life was in full swing thereb, which yours destroyed in the bud, distributing Russian houses, lands, churches to the highlanders.

Got it, no?

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: Olgovich

open ANY map of the world and find RUSSIA on it.

That's what I'm talking about. The state of Russia is correctly called the Russian Federation. We read what a federation is "Federation (lat. Foederātiō - union, association), ....... is a form of state structure, in which parts of the state are state formations with a legally defined political independence within the federation." This is from wikipedia, but you can check it from any school textbook. Further, tell me, where is the part of the state that has a legally defined political independence within the federation, formed by the RUSSIAN PEOPLE? Educated by the Chechen people, there is, by the Tatar people, by the Circassian people, etc., but not by the Russian people. By the way, in the days of the USSR, Russians had their own state education, but now they do not. These are the facts that you love to talk about. And everything else is smoke, fiction and demagoguery. However, your like-minded people are always like this, there is nothing behind the words.

[Olgovich]

Quote: aleksejkabanets

Quote: Olgovich

open ANY map of the world and find RUSSIA on it.

That's what I'm talking about. The state of Russia is correctly called the Russian Federation. We read what a federation is "Federation (lat. Foederātiō - union, association), ....... is a form of state structure, in which parts of the state are state formations with a legally defined political independence within the federation." This is from wikipedia, but you can check it from any school textbook. Next, answer me, where is a part of the state with a legally defined political selfactivity within the framework of the federation formed by the RUSSIAN PEOPLE? Educated by the Chechen people, there is, by the Tatar people, by the Circassian people, etc., but not by the Russian people. By the way, in the days of the USSR, Russians had their own state education, but now they do not. These are the facts that you love to talk about. And everything else is smoke, fiction and demagoguery. However, your like-minded people are always like this, there is nothing behind the words.

EVERYWHERE on the territory of Russia, which was created by the Russian people.

No Russians, no Russia

Did it get there?

Quote: aleksejkabanets

By the way, during the times of the USSR, the Russians had their own state education,

falling lies, the Russians did not have anything.

These are the facts.

Quote: aleksejkabanets

which you love to talk about. And everything else is smoke, fiction and demagoguery. However, your like-minded people are always like this, there is nothing behind the words

-

One empty TATTOO at yours.

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: Olgovich

EVERYWHERE on the territory of Russia, which was created by the Russian people.

No Russians, no Russia

Did it get there?

How interesting! Only the Russians do not have their own national republic, like the Circassians or Chechens, there is no national power, like the Tatars or Kalmyks, there is no president of their own, like the Ingush or Ossetians. Or is there, and if there is, where? Even within the framework of the federation, the Russian people are deprived of rights in comparison with other nationalities. Here next to me is Adygea, so they have their own laws, but we, the Russians, do not.

Quote: Olgovich

Quote: aleksejkabanets
By the way, during the times of the USSR, the Russians had their own state education,

falling lies, the Russians did not have anything.

These are the facts.

The fact is that the Russians had the RSFSR, as your memory selectively works.

[Olgovich]

Quote: aleksejkabanets

How interesting! Only the Russians do not have their own national republic, like Circassians и

.

Here is Konst. KCh - for the ignorant:

CONSTITUTION
KARACHAEVO-CHERKESS REPUBLIC

(As amended by the Constitutional Laws of the Karachay-Cherkess Republic
dated 24.04.99, N 622-XXII; dated 12.07.2000 N 10-rz;
from 30.08.2000 N 16-rz; dated 17.10.2000, N 22-rkz)

We, the deputies of the People's Assembly of the Karachay-Cherkess
Republic, realizing their responsibility to the peoples
multinational Karachay-Cherkess Republic, which united in
the course of historical development, the common fate of the Abaza, Karachais,
Nogais, Russian, Circassians and citizens of other nationalities, in
united republic

those. Russians have ALL Russia - THEIR republic

Quote: aleksejkabanets

but we, the Russians - no

see above and find out, finally, that each region has a code of laws: (as amended by Of the Law of the Krasnodar Territory dated 09.06.2010 No. 1993-KZ)

Quote: aleksejkabanets

The fact is that the Russians had the RSFSR, as your memory selectively works.

Not a word about Russians in your Const rsfsr 1937 not at alle. But there is a LOT of state. nat. formations-the same KCh, DaASSR, etc., etc. on its tele-vesto of the provinces. There Tatars, Bashkirs, Kalmyks are mentioned, and there are NO Russians at all.

Today, the Constitution of Russia also contains Russian language of the state-forming people and Russian culture.

Decision Const. Russian courts:

"The regulation on the Russian language as the language of the state-forming people, which is part of the multinational union of equal peoples of the Russian Federation (article 68, part 1, of the Constitution of the Russian Federation in the proposed edition), based on an objective recognition of the role of the Russian people in the formation of the Russian statehood, the successor of which is the Russian Federation»

Everything is said clearly and to the point.

[paul3390]

You are a strange man. What is Fatherland? This is the country where you were born. Is not it? I was born in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. And he - gave me everything that I have. He - made me what I am. And it is to him that my loyalty belongs. Because he is my Motherland, from which I have not seen anything bad, only good.

You are trying to assure me that not only should I feel some kind of warm feelings for those who destroyed my Fatherland, what I would have inherited from my father and grandfather, I should also fight for them !! Protect those who killed my homeland! Those who robbed my people to the bone, those who took away even the future from them! Don't you think this is absurd?

Let's say you inherited a house. Such a good one, dear. And then - the muddy pretzels came, showed a fake sales contract, stuffed you in the face and threw you out of the house. Stating that from now on - he is not yours.

And after a couple of years - they, in turn, were run over by bandyugans, trying again to wrest the house. Already myself. The question is - will you go to defend those first? Will you get under the bullets for them? And in general - will you have any obligations towards them? Will you have a desire for an hour on such an occasion - to return the house to yourself? No? Having slammed both old and new ones?

[Olgovich]

Quote: paul3390

You are a strange man. What is Fatherland?

You were supposed to be taught at school.

Quote: paul3390

I was born in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. And he - gave me everything that I have. He - made me what I am.

He flew from space, with the lands, the people? Or, nevertheless, tofor a THOUSAND years these lands were collected, equipped, defended, populated, created the largest state in the world, the second fastest growing people in the world, the greatest culture and science? Or did yours bring all this from their Swiss? No, the result of yours is the borders of the 17th century and the Russian cross

Quote: paul3390

You are trying to assure me that I should not only feel some kind of warm feelings to thoseWhoever destroyed my Fatherland, what I would have inherited from my father and grandfather, must also fight for them !! Protect those who killed my homeland! Those who robbed my people to the bone, those who took away even the future from them! Don't you think this is absurd?

Fatherland is not powerful personalities, at least read yourself. Or for you, the Fatherland is ... the Khrushchevs, Trotsky y, Ulyanovs?

Your grandfathers, great-grandfathers and great-grandfathers had it and they protected it, normal people still have it and they protect it, regardless of the form of power and personalities.

some, with the next coming of the Germans, will go to the policemen and the enemy army. And you simply won't be left with any other choice: either there or there.

Quote: paul3390

Let's say you inherited a house. Such a good one, dear. And then - the muddy pretzels came, showed a fake sales contract, stuffed you in the face and threw you out of the house. Stating that from now on - he is not yours.

And after a couple of years - they, in turn, were run over by bandyugans, trying again to wrest the house. Already myself. The question is - will you go to defend those first?

those who are not tolerant consider the house their own and protect it all together from outside bandits and establish order within it in accordance with the wishes of its inhabitants.

[Nubia2]

what a stupid and primitive position you have.
however, this is often found now

[Olgovich]

Quote: Nubia2

what a stupid and primitive position you have.
however, this is often found now

what a stupid and primitive position you have.
however, this is often found now-one empty, fallen TATTOO

[Nubia2]

Wow!!! full copy of the comment as an argument. you definitely came up with it first)))
don’t worry. Well, think at school history lessons you skipped the toilets.
so you and others like you live with this and do not know about their own inferiority with a tendency to slide towards fascism

[Olgovich]

Quote: Nubia2

Wow!!! full copy of the comment as an argument

your empty chatter on mine data- this is .... "argument", but what has been said is the same to you - already ... no?

Quote: Nubia2

don’t worry. Well, think at school history lessons you skipped the toilets.

Lovers of "arguments" there below were

Quote: Nubia2

so you and others like you live with this and do not know about their own inferiority with a tendency to slide towards fascism

it's funny when they talk about ... inferiority "

And yes: not to them, to complete bankruptcies and losers who have passed everything (party, country, army, etc.), to give ... estimates and forecasts are ridiculous ...

PS on the topic has nothing to say? And why then e?

[Orkraider]

Good holiday!
Not only for those who have a status, but also for those who are in fact.
And therefore, I congratulate all people, past and present, who deserve this title on the holiday!

[Rusfaner]

Heroes of the Fatherland Day in Russia!
Save, Lord, the living and glory to the fallen!

[Mikhail Sidorov]

I would like to recall the heroes of Donbass who defended the Russian-speaking population and not only from genocide. Dead and alive.

[Ashes of Claes]

As before, I am amused by this irresistible craving for the establishment of all kinds of holidays. Yes, on the one hand, of course, it is necessary to give honors to the people who laid down their lives on the altar of the Fatherland (excuse the pathos) in any period of its existence, under any coat of arms. BUT! So, indiscriminately, to combine Serdyukov and Vasilisa Kozhina in one company - there is a kind of slight cynicism in this.
GSS Rufina Sergeevna Gasheva was still alive when Kadyrov was attached the star of the hero of Russia to the lapel of his Armani.

[askort154]

The devaluation of the ruble is the country's economy.
Devaluation of awards is a loss of morality in the appropriators of these awards.

[23424636]

The author can see not everything is known about this day, because he vaguely painted it somewhere in December. Alas, today is the day when in Russia it was possible to escape from the master to another before the cross in the church. But then his (this day) Godunov, through Tsar Theodore Ioanovich, was canceled, and they began to say about the ban - Here's your grandmother and St. George's Day.

[Ros 56]

Honor to them and Glory forever and ever and the lowest bow to both the dead and the living.

[Living7111972]

I will stand up for Rokhlin!

[Andrey Student]

Russian (Russian, Soviet) peasants have been hitting and beating every infection for a thousand years. Blessed memory of the dead, alive for many years.

[Andrey Student]

According to the photos of Kiriyenko and Serdyukov - the text of the decree on awarding or their photo (not photoshop) with a star in the studio, by the way, it is not superfluous to remember how imam Shamil and many former policemen were cared for and cherished (including the cavalier of the Red Star Gil-Rodionov). I'm not a fan of them, but when they write about the present. time it is necessary to remember the past.