Rand Corp analysts urge the US Army in Europe to rely on light infantry, not tanks

38

In recent years, the world political situation has remained extremely tense. The European Region is no exception. The USA and NATO see here the main enemy in Russia, therefore they are building up their armed forces close to the Russian borders. Meanwhile, not all actions of the American army can be beneficial for stabilizing the situation in Europe.

The Rand Corp Research Center draws attention to the emphasis on heavy armored brigades by the United States and its allies. But it is their deployment in Eastern Europe that acts as a provoking factor for Russia and compels Moscow to deploy additional divisions. An alternative would be to deploy light units, which are certainly not as annoying for the Kremlin.



A simple military build-up is provocative and undoubtedly cannot be viewed as a tool to enhance stability. Neither Russia in Europe nor China in the Pacific region will reduce their military activity in a situation where the United States is building up its forces. Accordingly, a different approach is needed that goes beyond the usual race in arms and formations.

Many military analysts are arguing over whether the US should deploy military brigades to Poland and the Baltics. Presence advocates tank brigades in Eastern Europe see them as a way to contain Russian aggression, but lighter brigades could play a much more interesting role.

So, these brigades can include military instructors for the army units of the allied countries, provide support to the Polish, Baltic and other armies, while there will be no provocation factor itself, which occurs in the event of the transfer of tank or mechanized brigades to Eastern Europe.

In modern conditions, the report of Rand analysts emphasizes, the army can more effectively resist tank brigades with light infantry units. Such tactics are especially successful in urban conditions, and Europe is a very dense building and cities close to each other.

Thus, the authors of the Rand report come to the opinion that the United States should move away from the idea of ​​deploying heavy units in Europe, and focus on the formation of such light infantry brigades that could solve two main tasks at once - training allied forces and resisting enemy forces in the event their incursions into the territory of the countries of the North Atlantic Alliance.
38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    3 December 2021 10: 43
    It's time for NATO members to switch to bicycles. And quickly, and inexpensively, and easily dismount.
    1. Rex
      0
      3 December 2021 11: 36
      And if you also equip with spears, then you can arrange knightly tournaments ...
      1. -2
        3 December 2021 13: 17
        Quote: Rex
        And if you also equip with spears, then you can arrange knightly tournaments ...

        Apparently never seen real teachings even. What kind of light infantry is there against tanks?
        Have you seen enough of Rambo? Or are they counting on some kind of Javelins and UAVs? Light infantry against tank brigades, tactical aircraft in the sky, and artillery sets up an "umbrella" of shrapnel explosions over attacking tanks. There will be no way to lift your head out of the trenches ...
  2. +1
    3 December 2021 10: 45
    Well this is a direct call for the supply of cannon fodder: without armor, the infantry is exactly that ... maybe other equipment will also do without aviation?
    1. 0
      3 December 2021 10: 56
      Quote: aleks neym_2
      other equipment will do without aviation?

      Swords, spears, bows - that's enough! lol
    2. +1
      3 December 2021 11: 13
      Quote: aleks neym_2
      Well this is a direct call for the supply of cannon fodder: without armor, the infantry is exactly that ... maybe other equipment will also do without aviation?


      For the West to declare Russia an occupier, the cannon fodder of the Balts and Ukrainians is enough. The main thing for them is to create conflict situations on the Russian border.
    3. 0
      3 December 2021 11: 51
      Rather, it is the result of realizing the impossibility of real supplying heavy brigades in the local region in the case of Big Atatuy .. This is especially true of the Baltic States ..
    4. DMi
      +4
      3 December 2021 13: 23
      In Grozny, it was the light infantry that opposed the troops of the Russian Federation. Without armor and aircraft. It didn't turn out very well.
      1. -1
        3 December 2021 16: 24
        Do you think that, again, in tanks, the Russian Armed Forces will enter the cities of Grozny, as in 94? do not tell my sneakers ... and the commanders are not the same, and the army is not the same ...
        1. DMi
          +1
          3 December 2021 20: 34
          And what is taught in the Russian army tactics of street fighting? Not a spetsuru, they are probably being trained, but ordinary infantry and ordinary infantry commanders. I have not heard something. And if they don't teach, everything will be the same.
          1. 0
            4 December 2021 13: 34
            And, are you in general in the subject of today's divisions ??? if not, I think you shouldn't touch this topic ... I could tell you a lot of new things, but ... this is not the place, and I don't really want to ... live with your views ...
      2. 0
        3 December 2021 20: 38
        Quote: DMi
        It didn't turn out very well.

        Because according to science, at first the captured object should be covered with a nuclear or artillery strike, which would burn everything that is not covered by armor. Then the tanks should come in and knock out everything that was covered by the armor. And then the motorized infantry occupies the area.
  3. +1
    3 December 2021 10: 47
    ... that lighter brigades could play a much more interesting role.

    That's right, you need to run light. Here at least ask the global British. They are either from Dunkirk, from Syria, or from Afgan without any tanks. They would not have gone with the tanks, too fat cockroach on the table is very risky.
  4. +3
    3 December 2021 10: 50
    In today's environment, the Rand analysts report emphasized,
    ... Our experts have always noted that the Rand Corp Research Center is a serious office, which is listened to in stripes at the very top ...
    At the expense of the doctrine, the tactics they propose, this is a topic that will be considered in our most serious departments, offices, headquarters ... especially if / when they begin to implement it. In the meantime, this is only an option ... possible, but not required.
    1. +2
      3 December 2021 12: 51
      Quote: rocket757
      Our experts have always noted that the Rand Corp Research Center is a serious office, which is listened to in the stripes at the very top.

      That is why we can conclude that American experts realized that maintaining heavy armored vehicles in Europe against Russia is expensive, pointless, and most importantly, there is zero benefit from it with a rapid exchange of nuclear strikes. The publication of this article can be viewed in the context of future reductions in conventional weapons spending and reallocation of funds towards more high-tech weapons. So far, there is a probing of the reaction to such plans of different layers both in the United States itself and in the governments of Europe, in order to soften the pill for them.
      1. 0
        3 December 2021 13: 52
        Here you can build a whole theory or build a whole logical chain that will mean OBVIOUS.
        It is not possible to attack, crush / defeat a strong, vigorous, power, NOW, it is not possible to specialists, analysts, they want to bring it to the top ...
        A logical continuation ... a fundamental breakthrough in the military sphere is needed, which is not possible without progress in science and production, of course, an upswing in the economy as a whole.
        It is difficult, the task is not for one decade, if something extraordinary does not happen ... for example, green men will arrive !!!
        1. +1
          3 December 2021 19: 06
          Vitya prYuvet! I will not go into the depths of the centuries. Let me put it this way. The little green men gave us electricity, then radio waves. Then the secrets of the atomic nucleus. Then they realized that they had done something stupid. So, in the near future, technical progress does not threaten us. wink
          1. 0
            3 December 2021 23: 00
            Welcome soldier
            On the one hand, maybe so.
            On the other hand, the universe is immense, and pink elephants can also come !!!
  5. +2
    3 December 2021 11: 01
    include military instructors for the army units of allied countries, provide support to the Polish, Baltic and other armies, while the provocation factor itself will be absent
    And this factor somehow influenced NATO's presence somewhere. On the contrary, provocations helped to invade a foreign country (Korea, Vietnam, Iraq). In any case, the appearance (increase) of NATO troops on our border, be it mechanized units or "light" ones, creates a risk factor for conflict and forces Russia to take additional measures to ensure its security.
  6. +1
    3 December 2021 11: 04
    I don’t understand which of the Americans are instructors? The Americans first burn everything to the ground with planes and missiles, and then only let the infantry in, and even then mostly from PMCs.
    Where did the Balts and Ukrainians get missiles and aviation at a serious level, so that they could later launch the infantry?
    1. sen
      +3
      3 December 2021 11: 16
      Where did the Balts and Ukrainians get missiles and aviation at a serious level, so that they could later launch the infantry?

      So they said themselves, "The Americans first burn everything to the ground with planes and missiles" - this will be the main support of the United States.
      1. 0
        3 December 2021 11: 22
        And this will already be a war between NATO and Russia. NATO doesn't need that. They have already told the Ukrainians that they will not be harnessed. By yourself, all by yourself.
  7. -3
    3 December 2021 11: 11
    They voiced so vulgarly to dispense with their armored vehicles and launch ANYONE'S infantry to slaughter ... the concentration of the infantry is just as easily revealed as the technology, so the point in using someone else's cannon fodder is cheap and ... not angry, but safe for yourself.
  8. -1
    3 December 2021 11: 12
    Europe is a very dense building and cities close to each other.

    Well, yes, every city turns into a fortress. Tanks bypass the cities, close the ring, in the end the boiler. There is no bread, water and, of course, gas. Air supply, strong air defense around ... laughing laughing laughing
  9. -1
    3 December 2021 11: 18
    Well, "experts of a serious analytical center" fell into a mistake because of "democratic double standards"! request
    Being under the influence of false statements that NATO is supposedly not a hyperaggressive armed association-an instrument of globalist fascington neo-colonialism, but a kind of "defensive bloc against the aggression of the USSR (Russia)." fool
    That is why, fooled by their own "inappropriate" propaganda, the "researchers" working in the Rand Corp advocate for "light infantry" -type "it is Russia that attacks, and we, the doves of peace, are defending ourselves in our cities"!
    But NATO generals, knowing the real predatory plans of their Fashington leadership for the next "missionary" Drang nach Osten, maliciously "focus on heavy armored brigades "intended for offensive-attack on the Russian expanses, and not for the European small-town" defense "!
  10. 0
    3 December 2021 11: 28
    It remains to find a place to recruit numerous motivated infantrymen for the crowd of light infantry brigades.
  11. 0
    3 December 2021 11: 29
    Does Russia really care about the size of the police in NATO countries?
    Probably not, from the word at all. Why ? The police are not suited for offensive operations.
    As incidentally, light-armed infantry is not suitable for an offensive.
    If NATO pursued peaceful goals in Europe, there would be no need for heavy American weapons on the continent at all. Especially on the borders with Russia.
    They know for sure that Russia is not going to attack.
    But they are taking them ... So who is the source of the aggression ?!
  12. 0
    3 December 2021 11: 59
    I think this is about saving the US resource.
    In Europe, the Papuans must fight with the Russian Federation, with their tanks and aircraft, and America will send police instructors and intelligence. Why would they need all this logistics and logistics?

    It is expensive to maintain the strike groups of Alya World War II. The hegemon is paper, it can break. Diesel fuel with food will only go up. Therefore, let the Papuans fight, and then the Americans will come and save everyone.
  13. +1
    3 December 2021 12: 00
    One of the commentators on our website wrote about this: “Since 2019, the Pentagon has begun practical testing of a new strategic concept of warfare, which has received the name“ mosaic multi-sphere war ”.
    In addition to the traditional "battles" on land, in the air and at sea, combat will have to be conducted in space, cyberspace and the field of social media technologies.
    Even before the outbreak of hostilities, the enemy country must be convinced of the invincibility of American superiority in military and technological power, with a critical undermining of its will to provide staunch resistance.
    The attacked society must develop a strong conviction that everything has completely collapsed, nothing is working, now everyone is for himself and it is absolutely absurd to continue meaningful resistance. Only consent to immediate, complete and final surrender should seem like salvation. And if your own government refuses to do this, then it must be removed immediately.
    This is supposed to be achieved by a combination of three factors:
    First, the army is testing a new system for collecting and processing current information.
    Second, the structure of the US military is fundamentally reorganizing the structure in the direction of radically increasing the mobility of units and ensuring radically greater autonomy of brigade battle groups.
    For this, the line infantry is maximally lightened and transferred to the format - tactical infantry, and lightweight, mainly wheeled, armored vehicles.
    These units serve to seize and maintain control over space, as well as to maximize the scattering of the enemy command's attention throughout the theater of operations to the extent that he loses a clear understanding of the current configuration of American forces, which means he is forced to act impulsively, therefore, irrationally and unprepared. Thus, constantly substituting under the blows of brigade tactical groups from the mechanized brigades.
    Third, the reliance on satellite communications, a radical reduction in the time of fire reaction to emerging threats, especially at the stage even before entering into direct fire contact with them, superiority in situational awareness and reconnaissance, as well as constant, detailed knowledge of the location, state and specific actions of all, down to a single unit of equipment or an individual soldier, should ensure the success of the battle as a whole.
    The Pentagon assumes that the troops will no longer storm stubbornly resisting defense units for a long time or stubbornly hold any positions themselves. That excludes the possibility of the existence of continuous continuous fronts. The key to victory in a big war with small forces is mobility, surprise and instant concentration of overwhelming firepower at key points.
    In the view of the American military command, battalion tactical groups will have to suddenly appear "almost out of nowhere", deliver crushing blows, and, then, depending on the result of the collision, either instantly go into a breakthrough developing success, or quickly pull back, breaking contact with the enemy long before he has time to react and bring heavy support or aircraft to the battlefield.
    Thus, the continuous fabric of the battle must disintegrate into a huge, complex, extremely rapidly changing mosaic of numerous instantaneous point skirmishes, without a clear front or flanks.
    The adversary in this concept must quickly lose the adequacy of understanding what is happening, dissipate forces, lose interaction between them, expose communications and drown in a gigantic volume of incoming information about a rapidly changing situation. Which will lead to a critical increase in his losses in manpower and equipment, as well as degradation of the will to win even at the level of the high command and the complete demoralization of both army units in the war space, and especially civil society in the rear. ”His judgments make sense of the current Armed Forces USA.
    1. 0
      3 December 2021 13: 46
      as well as constant, detailed knowledge of the location, state and specific actions of everyone, down to an individual unit of equipment or an individual soldier
      What is it that they have such generals that they can command all and every soldier at the same time. Not otherwise will Superman be called. Or whoever they have the most megamind. And in the end it will come out, it was smooth on paper, but they forgot about the ravines.
      1. 0
        4 December 2021 11: 44
        For this, network-centric control systems are created, which are a combination of previously created and deployed branched automated electronic networks for collecting and primary processing of information, nodes for storing and analyzing information, as well as control and decision-making loops, which together create a single information and management space, covering the entire control space. The main idea of ​​the "network-centric war" is the integration of all forces and means in a single information space, which makes it possible to multiply the effectiveness of their combat use through the implementation of a synergistic effect. The introduction of network technologies in the military sphere is a truly revolutionary step aimed at increasing the combat capabilities of the armed forces through the efficiency and effectiveness of their use. I recommend at least looking through the works of: V.I. Annenkov, S.N. Baranov, V.F. Moiseev, S.S. Kharhalup. Network centrism: geopolitical and military-political aspects of our time. Textbook. - M.: RUSAVIA. 2013.
        A.E. Kondratyev. Problematic issues in the study of new network-centric concepts of the armed forces of leading foreign countries. M .: Military Thought, No. 11, 2009.
        IN AND. Grassland. On the implementation of network-centric principles of control of forces and means of armed struggle in operations (combat actions). M .: Military Thought, No. 12, 2009.
        A.A. Rakhmanov. Network-centric control systems: regular trends, problematic issues and ways to solve them. M .: Military Thought, No. 3, 2011.
        I.V. Surma. Global supranational actor of international relations and his social philosophy. MGIMO Bulletin. M .: MGIMO. No. 4, 2013 P.141-151
        S.A. Parshin, Yu.E. Gorbachev, Yu.A. Kozhanov. Modern trends in the development of theory and practice of management in the US armed forces. - M .: LENAND, 2009.
        S.A. Parshin, Yu.E. Gorbachev, Yu.A. Kozhanov. Is cyberwar a real threat to national security? - M .: KRASAND, 2011.
        Kashkin S.Yu., Slepak V.Yu. Organizational mechanism for
        military operations of the European Union as a means of ensuring national
        security of the EU member states // Actual problems of Russian law. - 2013. - 7. - C. 864 - 868.
    2. -1
      3 December 2021 20: 44
      With this tactic, how are they going to protect their supplies?
      Quote: sailor Roman
      For this, the line infantry is maximally lightened and transferred to the format - tactical infantry, and lightweight, mainly wheeled, armored vehicles.
      That is, they are giving up their infantry to be torn apart?

      Quote: sailor Roman
      The enemy in this concept must quickly lose the adequacy of understanding what is happening,
      This is a normal situation. What are they counting on?
  14. +1
    3 December 2021 12: 45
    I don’t know how anyone, but the idea expressed is quite sensible. And against the background of round-the-clock delirium from officials, it is so simply brilliant!
  15. 0
    3 December 2021 13: 20
    So, these brigades can include military instructors for the army units of the allied countries, provide support to the Polish, Baltic and other armies, while there will be no provocation factor itself, which occurs in the event of the transfer of tank or mechanized brigades to Eastern Europe.

    Instructors - only "on-line" and receiving crusts about the completion of the KMB self-driving in the USA.
  16. 0
    3 December 2021 16: 19
    in general, I am generally interested in one moment in this entire escalation ...
    here the star-striped ones send their instructors, the question arises, in what, shall we say, they are superior to instructors in all those countries like Ukraine and the Baltic republics? Poland, Bulgaria and Romania are understandable, but in the former Soviet republics ??? can they really teach better than the former "specialists" from the USSR ... as far as I know, there is not much to boast about ...
    or all the cool specialists only stayed in Russia ... - it's hard to believe in that ...
  17. 0
    3 December 2021 17: 54
    In Afghanistan, they had different brigades, and the lungs too. The lungs were the first to abandon their gear and equipment. If the majority of the army is represented by Puerto Ricans of Negro descent and they are commanded by an LGBT chick, then whatever you call this gang, it will remain a gang.
  18. 0
    4 December 2021 12: 56
    Well, okay, even if they are right in their calculations! But here's the main question. And how are they even going to lure our tank armada into their narrow-street towns? Just invite? What if we just don't go there? lol
  19. 0
    4 December 2021 13: 21
    The best thing for NATO is to go underground. And fight their way underground. Under the ground, swamps and frosts are not scary. You can work underground for days without knowing when it is day or night.