A Non-Peaceful Settlement: Why the War in Syria Doesn't End

82

Photo: Christiaan Triebert / flickr.com

Multifactor conflict


A peaceful settlement after such a long and bloody war is a very difficult process. Especially if this is a war in the Middle East and if several major players are involved in it at once. In the Syrian stories At first glance, everything seems quite optimistic - most of the country is under the control of Bashar al-Assad's army. Only in the northeast of Syria has a complex cocktail of the opposition "Syrian National Army", terrorists, Turkish forces, Americans and Kurds formed.

It would seem that refugees should return to the territories liberated with the help of the Russian Aerospace Forces. In Lebanon and Turkey alone, there are at least five million people displaced from war-torn Syria. However, everyone stays where they are. The peace that is spoken about in the liberated territories is too unsteady.



Among the refugees, there are stories of atrocities happening in the territories controlled by Damascus - robberies, kidnappings and human trafficking. People are afraid that with the unexpected exit from the conflict of one of the parties - the United States, Turkey or Russia - the situation may change dramatically, and they will again be forced to look for a new home. The ruins left at home are little better than conditions in refugee camps in neighboring states.

Every hopeful news about the end of the war invariably ends either in tragedy or another failure of government forces. First of all, hopes were pinned on the Syrian Constitutional Committee, within which the issue of a mutual peaceful resolution of the war is being considered. Taking into account the opinions and interests of the opposition and the government, of course.

The key controversy unfolded around the Syrian constitution.

The opposition is demanding a completely new basic law, while official Damascus insists on making adjustments to the 2012 version. At the request of Turkey, the Kurds were not included in the committee at all, which also does not contribute to a peaceful settlement at all. As a result, the last - the sixth - meeting of the constitutional committee on October 22 in Geneva ended in nothing.

The terrible explosion on October 20 in Damascus, which claimed the lives of 20 Syrian soldiers, played a significant role in this.

It was the largest terrorist attack in the last 4 years, which took place near the hotel, where the Russian delegation often stays. The organizers tried to achieve two goals at once - to intimidate Russia and prevent a peaceful settlement in Geneva. At least one was influenced, and the delegates of the constitutional committee left Switzerland without even agreeing on the next round of negotiations. The terrorist attack was exposed by the inability of Assad's special services to control the situation in the Syrian capital. A further escalation of the terrorist threat could be costly to supporters of a peaceful settlement of the war in Syria.

However, how many of these same supporters?

And is Bashar al-Assad himself ready to put up with the opposition on the terms dictated by Moscow and Iran?

The answer is not so obvious.

Assad comes out of isolation


There are no friends in the East, but only temporary or forced allies. It seems that Damascus is quite satisfied with the status quo and is ready to diversify its foreign policy. In a sense, to slightly move the interests of Russia and Iran, without which the return of Syrian territory to the government would be impossible.

This is facilitated by a favorable diplomatic climate. Despite the fact that the country is under tough US sanctions in the form of the Syrian Civilian Protection Act, Damascus officials manage to establish diplomatic contacts. So, in early September 2021, the Syrians were invited to Amman for quadrilateral talks with Egypt, Lebanon and Jordan. The topic was economic aid to Beirut, which, by the way, has sheltered at least 2 million Syrian refugees.

Further more. The Arab Emirates, which opposed the Assad regime from the very beginning of the war, unexpectedly offered to invest in the restoration of the republic and opened a representative office in Damascus. Everything leads to the fact that the diplomatic isolation of Syria is gradually weakening, at least on the part of the Arab countries. Abdullah II, the Jordanian king, who has been hosting Assad's opponents for many years, has already held telephone conversations with the Syrian leader.

Contacts between the two countries are also observed at the level of defense ministers. The state airline Royal Jordanian has resumed flights to the Syrian capital after a break. The League of Arab States, in turn, is ready to return Bashar al-Assad to the negotiating table on partnership terms - Egypt, Oman, Tunisia, Algeria and the United Arab Emirates agree with this.

So far, only Saudi Arabia has been displeasedly silent, but it will eventually agree with the opinion of the majority. If nothing extraordinary happens, then at the beginning of next year the next League summit will be held with the participation of the Syrian government.

Moreover, in the middle of this year there were rumors that Bashar al-Assad was ready for "separate" negotiations with the American government. Later, the media was quick to refute the information, citing rumors spread by opponents of the authorities. However, many analysts see attempts to establish a dialogue with the third players in history, behind the backs of Tehran and Moscow, quite understandable. First of all, because of Damascus' reluctance to resolve the issue peacefully, to which the Iranians and Russians are pushing it. Conciliation on the conditions of the constitutional committee, according to Damascus, does not make much sense - the opposition is kept on its feet solely due to Turkish aid.

Northeast Syria


The stumbling block of the Syrian conflict is the situation in the north-east of the country, in which the Americans, Turks, Kurds and the Syrian oppositionists grappled with each other.

The United States supports the Kurds as much as it wants, and Turkey, in turn, is trying to prevent the formation of Kurdistan on its borders. At the same time, the Joe Biden administration is ready to leave Syria, but the Kurdish problem does not yet allow this. The American administration already has a shameful case with the flight from Afghanistan, and it will be completely superfluous to add more abandoned Kurds to the karma.

At the same time, the Kurds are not ready for close cooperation with Russia. According to Ilham Ahmed, chairman of the executive committee of the Syrian Democratic Council, the Kurds have rejected Russia's offer to station 3 troops in Kobani in exchange for returning the area to Damascus jurisdiction. The fears of the Kudrs are connected with the prospect of complete control by Bashar al-Assad, under which there can be no talk of any autonomy.

A peaceful settlement in Syria is quite possible in the next year and even a few months. Only now it is necessary to remove all external forces - the United States, Turkey and Russia.

Bashar al-Assad is now quite capable of regaining control of 100% of the territory, but the behavior of the army and special services will not differ much from the situation ten years ago. Without external power control, Damascus may well arrange a large-scale retaliation action, including for those who return to their homeland.

Few people believe that the interests of the Kurds and the moderate opposition will be taken into account. Therefore, the complex military-diplomatic game in the Middle East will continue for more than one year.

And at this time, in Syria itself and its environs, a generation will grow up that has not seen either a peaceful life, or even a minimal education. What kind of social explosion this threatens in the future, one can only speculate.
82 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    5 December 2021 06: 03
    As long as Europe accepts "refugees" the conflict will continue.
    1. +4
      5 December 2021 06: 45
      Quote: Konnick
      While Europe accepts "refugees"

      Leave this Europe with its ... tolerance. Let him take espumizan so that he does not swell and puff up.
      A Non-Peaceful Settlement: Why the War in Syria Doesn't End

      Briefly, the situation can be explained by the principle of a communal apartment. It’s always crowded there for everyone and IMMEDIATELY, URGENTLY, everyone either “feeling sick”, or you need to clean up the body.
      1. +9
        5 December 2021 08: 08
        why the war in syria is not over

        Because the enemy is on Syrian soil. Part of the land is occupied.

        And as soon as Russia dumps this suitcase without a handle, pulling out a large amount of funds, the war will flare up with renewed vigor. And not in favor of Assad.
        1. +9
          5 December 2021 08: 25
          Quote: Stas157
          Because the enemy is on Syrian soil.

          Why, why and how many years all this lasts - I know. I do not understand the tactics of such actions. Who is there so tightly grabbed the Russian military by the testicles that they are forced to look around, warn, inform, coordinate? This crap reminds me very much of the "Chechen wars" ... There is a tactic to destroy terrorists. There are methods of active opposition to various "overseas and neighboring guests" ... If there was such a need for the presence of Russia in Syria in order to support and assist the LEGAL GOVERNMENT, then it was time:
          1. INITIALLY determine the boundaries of the territory to which Assad has rights.
          2. Notify the parties to the conflict about the rights of government troops in relation to armed gangs.
          3. Determine (even if through the UN Security Council) the ORDER AND LEGITIMACY of the presence on the TERRITORY of a SOVEREIGN STATE of an armed foreign contingent.
          4. To clean the territory of Syria from all armed formations (including foreign troops that do not have mandates) in the most radical way.
          Excuse me, but to portray the activity, hiding behind some lofty ideas and principles, is inappropriate in this case. This is not the Middle Ages with bows, arrows and messengers. There is the Aerospace Forces, there are high-precision weapons, there is international law that allows you to defend the sovereignty of the state by any available means ...
          And also two terms two hundred years you can pull rubber with a suitcase without a handle in your hand.
          1. +4
            5 December 2021 10: 00
            Why, why and how many years all this lasts - I know. I do not understand the tactics of such actions. Who is there so tightly grabbed the Russian military by the testicles that they are forced to look around, warn, inform, coordinate?

            The main problem is that we support the Alawite minority.

            Imagine, China sent troops to the territory of the Russian Federation put the president of Tatarstan in power. And all the key posts are also to them. winked

            We must play on the side of the majority. good
            1. 0
              5 December 2021 12: 45
              Quote: Arzt
              The main problem is that we support the Alawite minority.

              The main news (for me, at least) is that no one has ever announced this at the government level. On the contrary, we are told that the legitimate (acting) President of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, elected in accordance with the law, asked Russia (President Putin) to help free the country from gangs. What other stipulations might there be? Assad is not recognized? Tell me who?
              Quote: Edik
              I advise you to go to Syriato tip the scales in our favor, so to speak

              First, I finished my service in the USSR Armed Forces 30 (THIRTY!!!) years ago.
              Secondly, the stories of my comrades about the wars of recent Russian history and the goals for which everything was started were enough for me.
              I do not think that my presence in Syria will change anything for the better.
              1. +1
                5 December 2021 14: 02
                The main news (for me, at least) is that no one has ever announced this at the government level. On the contrary, we are told that the legitimate (acting) President of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, elected in accordance with the law, asked Russia (President Putin) to help free the country from gangs. What other stipulations might there be? Assad is not recognized? Tell me who?

                It's like that.
                And at the exit we have a Syrian trap. winked
            2. -2
              5 December 2021 15: 31
              "We must play on the side of the majority"
              At one time we wanted to join NATO. Did not work out. Until the states stop muddying the waters, there will be no peace anywhere.
          2. -1
            5 December 2021 10: 46
            Quote: ROSS 42
            1. INITIALLY determine the boundaries of the territory to which Assad has rights.
            2. Notify the parties to the conflict about the rights of government troops in relation to armed gangs.
            3. Determine (even if through the UN Security Council) the ORDER AND LEGITIMACY of the presence on the TERRITORY of a SOVEREIGN STATE of an armed foreign contingent.
            4. To clean the territory of Syria from all armed formations (including foreign troops that do not have mandates) in the most radical way.

            Yuri Vasilyevich is always surprised at you! All this has been done a long time ago, but in our time the right of the strong is in force. Whoever is stronger is right! I advise you to go to Syria in order to tip the scales in our direction, so to speak Yes
          3. +6
            5 December 2021 11: 45
            Quote: ROSS 42
            Determine (even if through the UN Security Council) the ORDER AND LEGITIMACY of the presence of an armed foreign contingent on the TERRITORY of a SOVEREIGN STATE.
            4. To clean the territory of Syria from all armed formations (including foreign troops that do not have mandates) in the most radical way.

            The USSR is gone...
            Only a superpower can do this.
          4. +4
            5 December 2021 20: 59
            Quote: ROSS 42
            Who is there so tightly grabbed the Russian military by the testicles that they are forced to look around, warn, inform, coordinate?

            Common sense. To swing the rights and brandish a pistol in a cramped room full of armed people is, to put it mildly, stupid, especially if this room is in someone else's house. And Putin does not look like a fool. Russia can be arbitrarily strong and invincible at homeBut expeditionary opportunities from this do not depend. Force projection is the question of logistics capabilities, and if the available logistics tools do not allow you to create at the projection point overwhelming superiority over other interested parties, then you have to negotiate.
            And rattling with a nuclear club in such situations is rather an admission of weakness. Yes, and it makes no sense, not having a monopoly on nuclear weapons.

            Quote: ROSS 42
            There are methods of active opposition to various "overseas and neighboring guests"...

            Every stick has two ends. Before using any "methods", it is worth asking yourself whether you are willing to undergo similar "methods" in return.
            In real life, "what about us?" does not work.

            Quote: ROSS 42
            INITIALLY determine the boundaries of the territory to which Assad has rights.

            Deciding is not a problem, the problem is that everyone else does not care about it. They have their own definitions, and in the end, you still have to negotiate and make compromises.

            Quote: ROSS 42
            Notify the parties to the conflict about the rights of government troops in relation to armed gangs.

            AND? Will everyone laugh? Rights are determined by the ability to exercise them.
            Toothless can declare his rights to chew as he pleases, food will not begin to chew from this.

            Quote: ROSS 42
            Determine (even if through the UN Security Council) the ORDER AND LEGITIMACY of the presence of an armed foreign contingent on the TERRITORY of a SOVEREIGN STATE.

            alone or what? Someone will support?

            Quote: ROSS 42
            To clean up the territory of Syria from all armed formations (including foreign troops that do not have mandates) in the most radical way.

            What do you do when they start to defend themselves? And if at the same time it is also effectively protected? What then? Thermonuclear apocalypse for the glory of Assad? Seriously?

            Quote: ROSS 42
            There is a VKS, there is a high-precision weapon

            EVERYONE who is "present" has it. (See the beginning of the comment.)

            Quote: ROSS 42
            there is international law that allows you to defend the sovereignty of the state by any available means ...

            You are a utopian idealist. In the real world, rights are determined by the ability to exercise them. And any action entails counteraction, any escalation entails a reciprocal escalation, and with equal opportunities for the parties, this is a senseless massacre in which everyone will be raked away without really achieving anything.
            (The Iran-Iraq war is a good example).
            You are now proposing to simply splash gasoline into a smoldering fire, and hide behind an icon, maybe it will blow over. It's not serious, the world doesn't work like that. Any, even the smallest decision of an (adequate) government is based on reliable facts, scrupulous analytics and forecast of consequences.

            Py.Sy. - Therefore, I prefer to draw up a picture of the real state of affairs from actions and facts, and not from victorious reports of journalists and propaganda.
        2. +6
          5 December 2021 12: 36
          Quote: Stas157
          And as soon as Russia dumps this suitcase without a handle, pulling out a large amount of funds, the war will flare up with renewed vigor.

          Yes, and let it flare up, what does Russia care about this? She climbed into Syria under the slogan of fighting Daesh, heroically defeated him several times - well, the stars were distributed, the titles were awarded, the PR passed, the locomotive with trophies was driven back and forth. And now why the heck is this closet with Russian yeast? Carrying chestnuts out of the fire for an ophthalmologist? Do you seriously think that all this company - the Russian Federation, the USA, the TR, the IRGC - is there to restore order in the BV? Funny.
          1. +6
            5 December 2021 12: 38
            Quote: Ashes of Klaas
            Now fuck this toilet with Russian yeast?

            And I agree with you. I don’t understand when someone gets into someone else’s war, and deprives their old people of their pensions.
            1. 0
              5 December 2021 13: 50
              Quote: Stas157
              Quote: Ashes of Klaas
              Now fuck this toilet with Russian yeast?

              And I agree with you. I don’t understand when someone gets into someone else’s war, and deprives their old people of their pensions.

              What do you mean you don't understand? If Assad had reached an agreement with Qatar and the Emirates in 12, then pipes with gas and oil would go through the territory of Syria, and then there would be neither the South nor the Arab sheikhs, and then the war will definitely stop,
              1. +5
                5 December 2021 16: 02
                Quote: igor67
                and then there would be no South or Turkish Stream, but there would be no North,

                Tell me, what about all these flows to me, a resident of the Russian hinterland? In order to conduct gas to the house, from the street, you have to pay more than 200 thousand, with an average salary in the urban-type settlement less than 17 thousand, plus a large percentage of unemployed. And what percentage of the population of the Russian Federation is gasified? I just don’t need to crack here about the fact that they (gas workers, oil workers) pay us a pension.
                1. +3
                  5 December 2021 16: 29
                  Quote: aleksejkabanets
                  Quote: igor67
                  and then there would be no South or Turkish Stream, but there would be no North,

                  Tell me, what about all these flows to me, a resident of the Russian hinterland? In order to conduct gas to the house, from the street, you have to pay more than 200 thousand, with an average salary in the urban-type settlement less than 17 thousand, plus a large percentage of unemployed. And what percentage of the population of the Russian Federation is gasified? I just don’t need to crack here about the fact that they (gas workers, oil workers) pay us a pension.

                  Recently I watched on YouTube how Qatar, the Emirates and Aman developed, that's exactly where the sheikhs thought about it, knowing that resources are not endless investing in science, the economy and most importantly in people, such social programs and assistance in obtaining education. By the way, they said that VTB Bank is under Qatar, so maybe this is the answer to your question
                2. -1
                  5 December 2021 21: 18
                  Quote: aleksejkabanets
                  Tell me, what about all these flows to me, a resident of the Russian hinterland? In order to conduct gas to the house, from the street, you have to pay more than 200 thousand, with an average salary in the urban-type settlement less than 17 thousand, plus a large percentage of unemployed. And what percentage of the population of the Russian Federation is gasified? I just don’t need to crack here about the fact that they (gas workers, oil workers) pay us a pension.

                  Without them, it will be even worse, much worse. In all areas.
                  Taxes and requisitions from scalping (in the opinion of many IPs) will turn into skinning.
                  Impoverishment of the country and Somalization.
                  Interventions, civil wars, separatism, banditry of the level of the 90s.
                  Disappear, albeit inferior, but free medicine and education.
                  The outflow of capital and the final collapse of the economy.
                  Hyperinflation, mass starvation, epidemics.
                  Unfortunately, the dependence on the pipe, although it has decreased (according to statements from the media), is still far from being completely overcome.
                  1. +2
                    5 December 2021 22: 33
                    Quote: And Us Rat
                    Unfortunately, the dependence on the pipe, although it has decreased (according to statements from the media), is still far from being completely overcome.

                    Yes, the state lives for the pipe and at the expense of the pipe (raw materials). Raw capitalism is our economy and the service of more developed countries is our destiny today.
                    Quote: And Us Rat
                    Disappear, albeit inferior, but free medicine and education.

                    They have long since disappeared, in the provinces anyway, only profanation remains.
                    Quote: And Us Rat
                    Impoverishment of the country and Somalization.

                    It's coming, open your eyes.
                    Quote: And Us Rat
                    Interventions, civil wars, separatism, banditry of the level of the 90s.
                    The outflow of capital and the final collapse of the economy.
                    Hyperinflation, mass starvation, epidemics.

                    This is not yet possible only thanks to "our" oil and gas monopolies? Do not make me laugh!
                    Quote: And Us Rat
                    Taxes and requisitions from scalping (in the opinion of many IPs) will turn into skinning.

                    For a long time already small business was skinned. already reached ordinary citizens.
                    Quote: And Us Rat
                    Without them, it will be even worse, much worse. In all areas.

                    Without whom without them? Without these joint-stock companies with fabulous salaries and dividends to "managers", with who knows who outgoing profits? Maybe it's better to turn them into normal state-owned enterprises?
                    1. 0
                      6 December 2021 19: 45
                      If everything is so terrible, then a natural question arises, what are you (the inhabitants of the Russian Federation) doing to change something for the better?
                      Or is everyone happy?
                      1. +1
                        6 December 2021 20: 16
                        Quote: And Us Rat
                        If everything is so terrible, then a natural question arises, what are you (the inhabitants of the Russian Federation) doing to change something for the better?
                        Or is everyone happy?

                        The answer to this question falls under the article on extremism, so I'd better keep silent.
                      2. -1
                        6 December 2021 21: 38
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        The answer to this question falls under the article on extremism, so I'd better keep silent.

                        There is no need to overthrow the government, it can be replaced even worse, as in Ukraine, for example. It is necessary to force the officials to do their job and pay for the theft.
                        I'm not a fan of Navalny, he works for foreign grants, but his methods work, which is why he is being spread rot. His second problem is a small team, their efforts are zilch.
                        But if at least 5 million people start doing the same thing - to convict officials of lies, theft and corruption, and bombard them with class action lawsuits, then the authorities will have to respond.
                        Water wears away the stone.
              2. -2
                6 December 2021 10: 25
                In 12, Assad agreed with Qatar and the Emirates, then pipes with gas and oil went through the territory of Syria, and then there would be neither South nor Turkish Stream, but there would be no North, but since they start to negotiate again, it may burn out for them, for the Arab sheikhs and then the war will definitely stop,


                Only Qatar why all this? They are not stupid and understand everything, even if Russia had a lot of problems through Ukraine alone, then there will be more transit countries and everything with its own troubles, and not so long ago, Saudi Arabia wanted to make Qatar an island.
                They found the ideal model by building the largest gas tanker fleet.
                1. +1
                  6 December 2021 10: 48
                  Quote: ViacheslavS
                  In 12, Assad agreed with Qatar and the Emirates, then pipes with gas and oil went through the territory of Syria, and then there would be neither South nor Turkish Stream, but there would be no North, but since they start to negotiate again, it may burn out for them, for the Arab sheikhs and then the war will definitely stop,


                  Only Qatar why all this? They are not stupid and understand everything, even if Russia had a lot of problems through Ukraine alone, then there will be more transit countries and everything with its own troubles, and not so long ago, Saudi Arabia wanted to make Qatar an island.
                  They found the ideal model by building the largest gas tanker fleet.

                  Now, yes, although you will agree that it is still cheaper through pipes than driving to liquefy And so on,
                  1. 0
                    6 December 2021 13: 34
                    It is undoubtedly cheaper through the pipe, but the political risks outweigh everything, and in Qatar they were clearly understood even in that distant year 12.
          2. -3
            5 December 2021 18: 20
            Quote: Ashes of Klaas
            She broke into Syria under the slogan of fighting Daesh

            No, Russia got into the SAR in order to have a stronghold in the Middle East and, accordingly, influence in the region. For what? Everything is simple! This is imperial ambition and there is nothing wrong with that. In addition, the territory of the SAR is rich in hydrocarbons and to fight for them too. Exactly the same thing the Americans do in BV.
            And to shout that we live in poverty here in Russia, and the money flies away to the war in the SAR, this is reasoning at the level of a village rubble, nothing more. Immediately, many say that it is time to send troops to Ukraine, and this is a hundred times more expenses ...
        3. -1
          5 December 2021 23: 50
          Why is the war in Syria not over?

          Because the enemy is on Syrian soil. Part of the land is occupied.

          Everything is much simpler ... We start with the interests of the main player in Syria, and this is certainly the Russian Federation and no efforts by Erdogan or the United States will immediately change this. How much peace in Syria is needed by the Russian Federation. The answer is obvious... We need no one in Syria to think of building a gas pipeline, even a small one... Gazprom in Europe cuts the loot and everything else does not matter. And the screen from official words that the Russian Federation is fighting terrorism is complete nonsense ... And believing in this is no less nonsense
        4. 0
          6 December 2021 12: 26
          Quote: ROSS 42
          Quote: Stas157
          Because the enemy is on Syrian soil.

          Why, why and how many years all this lasts - I know. I do not understand the tactics of such actions. Who is there so tightly grabbed the Russian military by the testicles that they are forced to look around, warn, inform, coordinate? This crap reminds me very much of the "Chechen wars" ... There is a tactic to destroy terrorists. There are methods of active opposition to various "overseas and neighboring guests" ... If there was such a need for the presence of Russia in Syria in order to support and assist the LEGAL GOVERNMENT, then it was time:
          1. INITIALLY determine the boundaries of the territory to which Assad has rights.
          2. Notify the parties to the conflict about the rights of government troops in relation to armed gangs.
          3. Determine (even if through the UN Security Council) the ORDER AND LEGITIMACY of the presence on the TERRITORY of a SOVEREIGN STATE of an armed foreign contingent.
          4. To clean the territory of Syria from all armed formations (including foreign troops that do not have mandates) in the most radical way.
          Excuse me, but to portray the activity, hiding behind some lofty ideas and principles, is inappropriate in this case. This is not the Middle Ages with bows, arrows and messengers. There is the Aerospace Forces, there are high-precision weapons, there is international law that allows you to defend the sovereignty of the state by any available means ...
          And also two terms two hundred years you can pull rubber with a suitcase without a handle in your hand.

          The Russian Federation cannot quit, otherwise analogies will arise ...
          How to end the war, but resettle those who disagree, and that's all, 30 percent of the population. Here is your answer.
          They didn’t pull out the roots, Assad on bayonets ...
          For a second, imagine if all foreign countries withdraw their troops? And the Russian base is neutral?
      2. +4
        5 December 2021 08: 10
        It’s always crowded there for everyone and IMMEDIATELY, URGENTLY, everyone either “feeling sick”, or you need to clean up the body.

        All "on the sly" want to solve their interests
        Revealed the terrorist attack and the inability of Assad's special services to control the situation

        I think that if the special services were incapable, there would be dozens of times more terrorist attacks, given the general "love" there for each other, among various forces
  2. +9
    5 December 2021 06: 09
    I mean, can they return 100% of the territory? ,, What about yourself? Will the Americans and the Turks themselves be kicked out?
    1. +5
      5 December 2021 09: 13
      Quote: ASAD
      I mean, can they return 100% of the territory? ,, What about yourself? Will the Americans and the Turks themselves be kicked out?


      They themselves will definitely not be kicked out, and it’s not even a fact that with the participation of the Russian Federation this will work out ... because. there are no moves at all.
  3. -3
    5 December 2021 06: 13
    Only in the northeast of Syria has a complex cocktail of the opposition "Syrian National Army", terrorists, Turkish forces, Americans and Kurds formed.


    Northeast Syria is an oil-bearing region. Until the oil is pumped out, the Americans will not leave.
    1. 0
      5 December 2021 06: 52
      Quote: Carat
      Until the oil is pumped out, the Americans will not leave.

      And, maybe, while the Russian Aerospace Forces and Assad will ask permission from the US military to expel them? You can't hold on to your boobs with one hand... There can't be two authorities in a country, two governments... There is international law, according to which the aggressors are neither asked for permission nor warned about deportation. If there is no strength and determination, there is no need to arrange a circus, as well as to explain that everything has long been “settled”.
      1. +8
        5 December 2021 06: 56
        There is international law, according to which the aggressors are neither asked for permission nor warned about deportation.


        Americans spit on international law.
        And force to expel them from there is not realistic. Neither Syria nor Russia will go into a direct confrontation with the United States.
        1. -2
          5 December 2021 07: 16
          Quote: Carat
          Americans spit on international law.

          And the Americans are absolutely uninteresting to me, all the more, their attitude to international law is indifferent. I'm curious why Russia is using such tactics when they spit on it and wipe their feet. Who declared the presence of the US military contingent in Syria legal?
          Quote: Carat
          And it is unrealistic to expel them from there by force.

          Yes, yes, yes ... I won’t remember about Vietnam and I won’t touch Venezuela. I won’t even mention Cuba - you may not know about it. And what about Afghanistan? What is YN doing there? Probably sitting in handcuffs on one of the ships of those AUGs that were eager to restore order ...
          Quote: Carat
          Neither Syria nor Russia will go into a direct confrontation with the United States.

          It remains to find out what counter-arguments the United States will be able to present if, after an ultimatum to withdraw in 48 hours, there will be “clean sand” at the location of their military?
          ==========
          Otherwise, this militarized masturbation must be stopped. It looks like double dealing.
          1. +18
            5 December 2021 09: 11
            Quote: ROSS 42
            I'm curious why Russia is using such tactics when they spit on it and wipe their feet.

            Because Russia is not as strong as they tell us about it in our TV.
            1. -1
              5 December 2021 10: 58
              Quote: Bez 310
              Because Russia is not so strong as they tell us about it on our TV.

              You do not watch where they lie. Perhaps the reason for such "deliberate caution" lies not in the declared "weakness" of the Russian army, but in the lack of will on the part of the country's leadership? When it’s calmer that long-term efforts to save and accumulate will not fall under sanctions ...
              Only politicians can have a negative impact on the course of army (front) operations. belay No matter what happens, so that someone does not think bad ...
              Oh! Oh my God! what will say
              Princess Marya Aleksevna!
              1. +3
                5 December 2021 11: 48
                Quote: ROSS 42
                Perhaps the reason for such "deliberate caution" lies not in the declared "weakness" of the Russian army, but in the lack of will on the part of the country's leadership?

                And I didn’t say anything about the Army ...
                1. 0
                  5 December 2021 13: 47
                  Quote: Bez 310
                  And I didn’t say anything about the Army ...

                  And I didn't blame you for that...
                  1. +1
                    5 December 2021 13: 55
                    Quote: ROSS 42
                    And I didn't blame you for that...

                    Well, yes, it's not you who wrote:
                    Quote: ROSS 42
                    lies not in the declared "weakness" of the Russian army,
              2. 0
                5 December 2021 13: 05
                Quote: ROSS 42
                You do not watch where they lie. Perhaps the reason for such “deliberate caution” lies not in the declared “weakness” of the Russian army,
                and in the absence of the will of the country's leadership?

                Yuri Vasilyevich was not a joke.
                Are you, it is you, who are ready to fight the US army in Syria, well, since the political path is "weak" and "indecisive" for you? The United States themselves announce the rules and violate them themselves when it is beneficial for them, they are not ordered by any country or the UN .. I’m just sure that you wrote here why we climbed into Syria! And God forbid there will be big losses, you will change your shoes again Yes
                1. -3
                  5 December 2021 14: 07
                  Quote: Edik
                  You, namely you, are ready to fight the US army in Syria, well, since the political path is "weak" and "indecisive" for you?

                  I'm retired for who knows how many years. When I served, I didn’t give a damn where the motherland would send me.
                  It is you who are trying to present any mistake, any political crap with some kind of miracle, perfection, which, if not ... would not exist. We were taught to evaluate by results, and not to chew snot on the subject of political officers.
                  Have you read all the posts on this topic? No? Then, what do you advise and are interested in?
                  I came up with a specific solution. There can be no alliances and agreements either with terrorists who are being fought, or with those who are illegally on the territory of a foreign country. When the decision was made, these nuances were known. And you sit and write "patriotic" pamphlets. What do you propose? To be at war forever? So there are many places in the world where you can designate presence. Are there any problems in Russia itself? When will they be decided?
                  According to your formulas: Americans cannot be touched - the whole world does not touch them; GB cannot be moved - there is a lot of stench, Ukrainian antics must be endured and continue to trade with it until it resolves by itself; in Turkey, if they get impudent, we will get rid of tourists; if the IOC and WADA demand, we will give up the flag and the anthem ... WHAT ARE WE LEFT WITH? WITH ILLUSOR HOPES?
                  In war there are enemies and allies. The US and Türkiye are not our allies. They have their own interests. The United States is generally not worth doing in the Eastern Hemisphere, and Russia should be afraid of them ... But what? How can the US threaten Russia? Destruction? Are you ready to feed the worms?
                  I see the predominance of selfish interests in foreign policy, inadequate answers and companionship. Who does the Russian government care about and whose interests does it defend in the international arena? And, most importantly, how?
                  1. -1
                    5 December 2021 15: 00
                    Quote: ROSS 42
                    I came up with a specific solution. There can be no alliances and agreements with either the terrorists who are fighting or with those who

                    How is it, all the time it was possible, but now it’s impossible?
                    The population of Syria was divided, how and why they did it is another question!
                    So you are proposing with the local population who do not agree with Bashar al-Assad, not to negotiate and bring everyone to a common denominator, but to kill everyone? Don't you think that this looks like genocide? And we seem to want peace on Syrian soil ..
                    Quote: ROSS 42
                    with whom they are fighting, nor with those who are in the territory of a foreign country illegally.

                    You see, with these who there is no way to fight request without big losses, both economically and politically, not to mention human! And you You know this, but you continue to speculate on this, are you a provocateur?
                    Quote: ROSS 42
                    What do you propose?

                    I propose not to speculate on the topic of Russia's impotence! In the world, no one at all believed that Russia would fit in with Assad, and no one expected what we have achieved now in Syria! And this was achieved through negotiations and agreements as well!
                    Quote: ROSS 42
                    GB cannot be moved - there is a lot of stench, Ukrainian antics must be endured and continue to trade with it until it resolves by itself; in Turkey, if they get impudent, we will get rid of tourists; if the IOC and WADA demand, we will give up the flag and the anthem ... WHAT ARE WE LEFT WITH? WITH ILLUSOR HOPES?
                    In war there are enemies and allies. The US and Türkiye are not our allies. They have their own interests. The United States is generally not worth doing in the Eastern Hemisphere, and Russia should be afraid of them ... But what? How can the US threaten Russia? Destruction? Are you ready to feed the worms?

                    No, I don't drink that much drinks
                  2. +1
                    5 December 2021 21: 42
                    Quote: ROSS 42
                    I came up with a specific solution.

                    Utopian projection. Your "decision" is not even one step ahead. Or are you sure that everything will be according to your scenario, simply because you want to? Then this is not a solution, this is Manilovism.
                    1. -4
                      6 December 2021 08: 20
                      Quote: And Us Rat
                      Then this is not a solution, this is Manilovism.

                      The guarantor is engaged in Manilovism - everything draws rainbow pictures for us from the distant future, but he himself cannot even just go out into the street (albeit with security) to see how people live ... This is Manilovism when the president arrives for a few hours they show how good and wonderful everything is, and four months later SUDDENLY methane explodes in the mine...
                      I remind you, who are engaged in sycophancy, the stages:
                      1. It is necessary to decide what Syria is today (not in 1980-1985), but in 2021. Where are the official borders of a sovereign state? Who are the Kurds, what kind of autonomy do they need, and how does their autonomy differ from the autonomy of other republics?
                      2. Establish the legality of the presence of armed groups and foreign contingents on the territory of Syria.
                      3. To develop a plan for joint combat operations with the Syrian army, methods and methods for the destruction (squeezing out) of forces not involved in ruling the country.
                      4. Carry out a practical military operation to destroy the forces and means of gangs and foreign military who are outside the law on Syrian territory (that is, not according to the laws and concepts that they prescribed for themselves).
                      What's not real? Americans will not leave the occupied territories? Let them melt from thermobaric ammunition. What are you afraid of? Of death? So sooner or later she will overtake everyone. And the essence of this life is not to die for (with) cementwith a backpack on his back.
                      But you, for sure, know exactly how you can compost people's brains for years, explaining that the mission of the Russian Aerospace Forces is carried out exactly as it happens today.
                      And I will tell you that this is how the policy of a weak state is carried out. A state that no one cares about. A state whose existence depends on the wishes of the hundreds of Russian thieves branded by the Forbes list.
                      Either you give me examples when a guaranteed word has changed the state of affairs, or write your letters to the address: Moscow, the Kremlin, the only and beloved for all ages.
                      1. +1
                        6 December 2021 19: 40
                        Quote: ROSS 42
                        Manilovism is handled by the guarantor

                        And you chose the guarantor, which means that you are also responsible for the result.

                        Quote: ROSS 42
                        when the president, who has come for a few hours, is shown how good and wonderful everything is, and four months later SUDDENLY methane explodes in the mine ...

                        And no one itches, well, apparently everyone triples everything.

                        Quote: ROSS 42
                        I remind you, who are engaged in sycophancy, the stages:

                        But being rude is stupid, no one is obliged to share your naive point of view.

                        Quote: ROSS 42
                        1. It is necessary to decide what Syria is today (not in 1980-1985), but in 2021. Where are the official borders of a sovereign state? Who are the Kurds, what kind of autonomy do they need, and how does their autonomy differ from the autonomy of other republics?

                        Get off the armored car, you are not at the rally.
                        Let's be specific.
                        1. Who needs it?
                        2. How exactly to make it work? Detailed, point by point.

                        Quote: ROSS 42
                        Establish the legality of the presence of armed groups and foreign contingents on the territory of Syria.

                        1. Who should do it?
                        2. How?
                        3. How to get recognition of this by other participants?

                        Quote: ROSS 42
                        Develop a plan for joint military operations with the Syrian army, methods and methods for the destruction (squeezing out) of forces not involved in governing the country.

                        And in the General Staff, apparently, everything is dumber than you? Do you seriously believe that they have not at least made an analytical assessment of the fundamental feasibility of such a scenario?

                        Quote: ROSS 42
                        Carry out a practical military operation to destroy the forces and means of gangs and foreign military who are outside the law on Syrian territory (that is, not according to the laws and concepts that they prescribed for themselves).

                        How do you imagine that? Do you shoot at the Turks or the Americans, but they pretend to be a target and do not shoot back? wassat
                        Well, there is no need to write nonsense at all.

                        Quote: ROSS 42
                        What are you afraid of? Of death?

                        Fools with initiative. Haven't seen anything worse. Even in combat, it's not that scary.

                        Quote: ROSS 42
                        A state whose existence depends on the wishes of the hundreds of Russian thieves branded by the Forbes list.

                        There are even more people from the Forbes list in China, but this did not prevent the PRC from becoming the second of the two superpowers on the planet, and does not prevent it from developing by leaps and bounds.
                        Testicles interfere with a bad dancer.

                        Quote: ROSS 42
                        Either you give me examples when a guaranteed word has changed the state of affairs, or write your letters to the address: Moscow, the Kremlin, the only and beloved for all ages.

                        And why should I? He is not my president.
              3. +4
                5 December 2021 20: 39
                Quote: ROSS 42
                You do not watch where they lie. Perhaps the reason for such "deliberate caution" lies not in the declared "weakness" of the Russian army, but in the lack of will on the part of the country's leadership?

                Isn't the lack of will among the leadership a weakness of the state?
                1. -2
                  6 December 2021 08: 25
                  Quote: Maki Avellievich
                  Isn't the lack of will among the leadership a weakness of the state?

                  This is cowardice and weakness. Demonstration of arrogance and swagger in front of the impoverished mass of citizens is cynicism.
          2. +4
            5 December 2021 21: 30
            Quote: ROSS 42
            It remains to find out what counter-arguments the United States will be able to present if, after an ultimatum to withdraw in 48 hours, there will be “clean sand” at the location of their military?

            Does the echo of the Cuban crisis keep you up at night?
            What if they don't bluff and promise to answer in a mirror image? What then? Climb into the bottle? Giving back?
            What if it's worse? They will ignore, and the "pure-sand" efforts will come out in zilch? They just knock down those who try to bomb them, and you can’t dig under them - self-defense in its purest form.
            How then to wash such a stain from the pants?
            1. -1
              6 December 2021 08: 31
              Quote: And Us Rat
              They just knock down those who try to bomb them, and you can’t dig under them - self-defense in its purest form.

              So far, there are no means against hypersonic weapons. If my memory serves me right, Russia has such weapons.
              You are not worried about your pants, but about those capitals and real estate that can be torn away by the most shameless method in retaliation. Tell Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar about the death of American soldiers, abandoned military equipment and property.
              1. +1
                6 December 2021 18: 57
                Quote: ROSS 42
                So far, there are no means against hypersonic weapons.

                Wunderwaffe? And hitting back with conventional weapons will prevent ... what?

                Quote: ROSS 42
                You are not worried about your pants, but about those capitals and real estate that can be torn away by the most shameless method in retaliation.

                Nefig was to withdraw capital from the country and invest in real estate over the hill.
                Just do not poke at the authorities again, "they say it, but nothing to do with us." You are ruled by those whom you allow yourself to rule. Power is the quintessence of society.

                Quote: ROSS 42
                Tell Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar about the death of American soldiers, abandoned military equipment and property.

                The one who warned amers a day in advance where they would shoot and how many times? What would God forbid hurt anyone?
                Who was allowed to save face, for the sake of negotiations and domestic political games in Washington? (When Trump's orders were sabotaged by the General Staff)
                Is there a name of at least one who died at the hands of the Iranians?
          3. +3
            5 December 2021 21: 36
            Quote: ROSS 42
            I will not remember about Vietnam
            And what about Afghanistan?

            And in Afghanistan, the USSR received a full-fledged revenge for Vietnam. Big spoon so to speak. And who guarantees that in Syria it is Russia that will suit the states of "Vietnam", and what if the other way around? What then?
      2. 0
        5 December 2021 21: 22
        Quote: ROSS 42
        If there is no strength and determination, there is no need to organize a circus, as well as to explain that everything has been "settled" long ago.

        That is, do not try to "save face"? What to do in such a case? Sprinkle ashes on your head?
        1. -1
          6 December 2021 08: 32
          Quote: And Us Rat
          That is, do not try to "save face"? What to do in such a case? Sprinkle ashes on your head?

          Shut up the fountain and behave according to the weight category, without cocking or banging your fist on the table.
          1. +2
            6 December 2021 11: 11
            The world is not black and white, and any of your childish maximalist "decisions" will only make things worse. There are objective reasons why the adult world is complicated and why adult decisions are more effective than teenage ones.
    2. +10
      5 December 2021 12: 38
      Quote: Carat
      Northeast Syria is an oil-bearing region. Until the oil is pumped out, the Americans will not leave.

      Don't talk nonsense. The Americans did not give up this oil. The volume of production there is generally trifling. This is not a war for slush.
      1. -3
        5 December 2021 19: 23
        Quote: Ashes of Klaas
        Don't talk nonsense. The Americans did not give up this oil. The volume of production there is generally trifling. This is not a war for slush.

        Check it out, you won't regret it:
        Nikolay Platoshkin. Diplomacy of a weak country
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPGnqM1CxGY
  4. +4
    5 December 2021 06: 27
    in the northeast of Syria, a complex cocktail of the opposition "Syrian National Army", terrorists, Turkish forces, Americans and Kurds has developed.
    Indeed, a cocktail that can be directly called an infernal mixture of "all against all." The fact that Assad, with our support, not only survived, but today the Americans are ready to negotiate with him like a sickle in one place. Therefore, they will continue to create problems in Syria and engage in outright robbery pumping oil in their own interests. So this is all for a long time.
  5. +2
    5 December 2021 07: 21
    All this for a long time, until the United States leaves ... from Iraq. The situation there is the same as in Syria, only the Iraqi government is supported by the United States and Iraqi Kurdistan, with the support of the United States "pills" on the government ..
  6. +1
    5 December 2021 08: 00
    Why is there no peace in Syria?
    Because Syria is a chessboard on which several states play a game at once, and we all know which ones.
  7. +2
    5 December 2021 08: 03
    I think because of external players. In principle, no one would refuse peace in Syria, but everyone wants peace on their own terms - for the Turks, these are the Kurds (unacceptable), for the United States, this is mainly influence in this region, for us ... (just don’t believe in the bike about terrorists) I also think the impact. Well, as usual - the cherry on the cake - OIL. That's all in principle.
  8. +3
    5 December 2021 08: 37
    Now the majority considers the forces of international solidarity to be something frivolous. The last such movement was in protest against apertheid in South Africa. With the collapse of the USSR, fear began to descend on the world community. Fear for your own. When a politician says that his favorite movie is about the dark forces of evil, for me it ceases to exist. And here the pandemic has added a spark to this sticky fear. Oddly enough, fear breeds aggression. Again, for my own personal. Somewhere the SBU, somewhere the FBI, somewhere ABVGD ... Everything is aimed at ensuring that a person sits in his mink and does not stick out.
    1. -1
      5 December 2021 21: 51
      Quote: nikvic46
      Everything is aimed at ensuring that a person sits in his mink and does not stick out.

      The main thing here is not to overdo it.
  9. -1
    5 December 2021 09: 46
    Russia has invested, bases in Syria are worth a lot, experience, advertising, etc. If Assad twitches, then there will be a new president in Syria.
    1. -2
      5 December 2021 13: 05
      Quote: Petrik66
      If Assad twitches, then there will be a new president in Syria.

      Are you not funny yourself? Especially looking at the recent successes of the Russian Federation in international politics. And if you look at what is happening inside Russia with politics and the economy, it becomes completely sad.
  10. -1
    5 December 2021 09: 48
    In vain they created a viper in Idlib! Not the American zone, today the threat to Syria, but the Turkish one. Let everyone get along behind the Euphrates, in the Kurdish region, and the opposition, and the Kurds, and the Turks with the Amers. The ball would still be the same. And according to the situation inside the controlled territory, indeed, there are no reports of the identification and destruction of gangs, groups and underground cells. Yes, and with Israel, they are coddling for too long, there must be an adequate response for the attack. We did our job, did not allow Syria to be crushed, helped to take control of most of the territory. We have bases to control the Middle East, and the "first violin" in the hostilities with the barmaley must be given to Iran, they have their own methods of diplomacy.
    We ourselves, at our side, have grown our own "Idlib" and we will still have to solve problems with it. We will simply be forced to make such a decision.
    1. +2
      5 December 2021 22: 05
      Quote: Vladimir61
      Yes, and with Israel, they are coddling for too long, there must be an adequate response for the attack.

      This is in theory, but in fact - no one wants to risk getting hit on their "adequate answer". And she will be, she is 70 years old always there was and is no objective reason to expect something else, and everyone knows this.

      Quote: Vladimir61
      to control the Middle East

      It's too loud. To control the most armed region of the planet with a dozen aircraft and a company of special forces is not even a joke.
      1. -2
        6 December 2021 00: 14
        Control the most armed region of the planet with a dozen aircraft and a company of special forces,


        You're right... it's amazing and inexplicable. The same Americans could easily dishevel the airfield to pieces. They didn't. What they were afraid of - do not understand. In fact, on the part of Russia, this was an undertaking on the verge of an adventure. And rolled. Miracles. What happened then? Obamka was a lame duck, Erdogan bit the bit. Ours climbed with meager forces without any chance, even if there was a minimal rebuff - and everything worked out for you.
        .
        1. +2
          6 December 2021 03: 05
          Quote: dauria
          Ours climbed with meager forces without any chance, even if there was a minimal rebuff - and everything worked out for you.

          Grammar timing. Analysts from Putin's team, in principle, do not eat their bread in vain. This is not the first time they have developed brilliant tactical actions on the verge of a foul.
          But their weak point - lack of skills in strategic planning, long-term scenarios, longer than a couple of years - are simply absent.
          They do not know how to correctly develop tactical success, and therefore all their bright "blitzkriegs" get stuck in a swamp of consequences.
          The most illustrative examples:
          1. They froze Chechnya with money, brought Kadyrov to power and organized "subsidies" for him, they found a use for former militants. But they did not create a counterbalance, and if the money suddenly runs out, they will have to fight with them again. You shouldn't deceive yourself. Their loyalty belongs to Chechnya and Islam, and the Russian Federation is just a sponsor for them.
          2. We developed a reference operation for the capture of the Crimea, but did not prepare a clear plan for leveling the consequences. As a result, the country suffered significant economic and diplomatic damage.
          3. Syria itself. Beautifully entered, fought beautifully. But then they could not clearly refute a bunch of accusations, from the bombing of civilians to chemical attacks. The fact that on the first channel they poked a finger at white helmets is for domestic consumption. The Western citizen sincerely believes that Russian pilots burn children with napalm. The same layman who pays for NATO. And now it is generally unclear what Russia should do next in Syria. The initiative has been lost, the momentum has dried up, Assad is looking to the left.
  11. -7
    5 December 2021 10: 29
    The article was published at 22.00 Washington time. This is logical and corresponds to the message of the text. On Sunday at 6 am everyone is still sleeping.
    A bit of lies are diluted with a bit of truth and provoking false conclusions are stuck together. Even laziness to disassemble them is a matter for the 10th grade of high school.
  12. +1
    5 December 2021 11: 07
    As long as humanity exists, wars in one form or another will continue here and there. Only a clear and inevitable threat from outer space can put an end to this, the consequences of which can cause disaster on a planetary scale. But then it will be too late to realize that we have lived wrong.
  13. 0
    5 December 2021 11: 14
    Quote: E. Fedorov
    not even a minimum education

    "Russian students donated over 300 school kits to Syria."



    Schoolchildren in Syria received notebooks and backpacks from Russia


    There are plenty of such photos from schools in Syria on the internet.
  14. +1
    5 December 2021 11: 16
    Everything is very simple to explain in Islamic countries the concept of autonomy or the granting of power to national minorities in places of compact residence. Here is which of the commentators will name Islamic countries where there is autonomy, just do not take into account Iraq and the post-Soviet republics. Not that one and all this conference is just chatter, because all participants know that signing a document does not mean that it will be fulfilled.
  15. +2
    5 December 2021 11: 58
    Too small a country in a too active region for shushu-mushu with the opposition, alas. Syria, like many other states, must adhere to a simple principle in order to survive as a state - a combination of turnover of power and the immutability of a tough response to any hint of separatism. Otherwise, the dumping of the entire opposition into some kind of "stuffy heap" is inevitable, which then has to be raked up for years, and where no one trusts anyone.
  16. -3
    5 December 2021 12: 29
    The author is clearly a mishandled Cossack.
  17. -1
    5 December 2021 14: 07
    The author's "logic" goes off scale - the UAE and Jordan have de facto recognized Assad, so the war does not end laughing

    As for Bashar al-Assad's policy towards Russia and Iran, we, in the person of Lavrov, called Assad just a situational ally. And this is deeply correct, since everyone knows the pre-war torsion of the ass of Assad's father and Bashir himself in relation first to the USSR, and then to the Russian Federation.

    Only one thing is incomprehensible - the author's experience for "Honduras, which is on fire": the longer the low-level military conflict in Syria continues, the longer our military bases will remain in the Middle East. And only Arabs like the UAE should finance the restoration of the Arab country of Syria - tea from the Russian Federation is not the USSR.
  18. -2
    5 December 2021 14: 12
    Syria has not yet fallen. (With)
  19. -2
    5 December 2021 20: 19
    Because neither the Turks nor Israel cleared the territory of Syria from the evil spirits nesting there.
  20. +1
    5 December 2021 20: 36
    There are no friends in the East, but only temporary or forced allies.


    and in the west, friendship and chewing gum between everyone.
    to the grave of one of my friends.
  21. +2
    5 December 2021 22: 36
    No one will go anywhere. True, they say the news live for a couple of days. Everyone has already forgotten how this conflict began. And, as I recall, it began with Qatari gas in Europe. The Americans said - "let's let gas through your territory to Europe" .Gazprom said - "let's let Iranian gas into Europe" Please, Bashar said. Oh, so the Americans said, you have dushmans on you. .
  22. +2
    5 December 2021 23: 25
    And Israel? The Golan is part of Syria, and Israel periodically launches ineffective air attacks.

    The United States is actually facing funding problems for its military. It would be on the wish list of the United States, Turkey and Israel for Russia to withdraw from Syria, but this is rather unlikely. Nobody leaves after victories.

    Russia is not stupid and sees the instability on the western borders of Russia as the situation in the Arab Shiite region becomes calmer. Why is this happening? because the instability in both regions is fueled by the same budget, the budget of the United States.

    Russia is likely to use this to its advantage. It is very likely that medium-level tensions remain in the Arab Shiite area. This forces the United States to spend most of its military budget in the area, including aid to Israel, and keeps the United States on the verge of exhaustion, weakening investment in its own forces and weakening investment in aid to other countries.

    The only part where Russia has more problems politically is the Kurds. Russia has taken a too friendly stance towards Turkey for the taste of the Kurds. If someone wants to be a friend of the worst enemies of the Kurds, then he will not be able to win the trust of the Kurds. The United States has failed in this, and with virtually the same approach, the result for Russia will not be different.

    The Kurds will not stop fighting both politically and militarily. Their struggle is for survival, they have no other choice, and this people is too big to remain under external domination for too long. In fact, Chinese aid to the Kurds against Turkey is likely to begin.

    (Automatically translated from English. Below is the original commentary in English)

    And Israel? The Golan is part of Syria, and Israel periodically does some low effective air attack.

    The United States is actually facing problems of financiation of its armed forces. It would be in the wish list of the United States, Turkey and Israel that Russia would exit from Syria, but this is fairly unlikely. No-one leaves after victories.

    Russia is not stupid, and see how the instability in the Western borders of Russia increase when the situation in the Arab Shia area gets calmer. Why does it happen? because the instability in both regions is fueled from the same budget, the budget of the United States.

    Russia is very likely to use it in its own benefit. It is very likely that mid level tension continues in the Arab Shia area. It forces to the United States to consum a bigger fraction of its military budget in the area, including the help to Israel, and keeps the United States bordering attrition limits, weakening the investment on its own forces and weakening the investment on help to other countries .

    The alone part in which Russia is having more problems, in political terms, is with the Kurds. Russia adopted a position too friendly with Turkey for the taste of the Kurds. If someone wants to be friend of the worst enemies of the Kurds, can not win the confidence of the Kurds. The United States failed in it, and with basically the same approach, the result will not be different for Russia.

    The Kurds will not stop fighting both politically and militarily. Their fight is for survival, they have no other option, and it is a people too large to remain under external domination too long. Actually, the Chinese help to the Kurds against Turkey is likely to begin.
  23. 0
    7 December 2021 09: 07
    What a "difficult" question! There is no longer a force in the world that set goals based on universal human values ​​and what should be called "human virtues" in the old fashioned way. Well, there is honor, loyalty, friendship, real development... So the situations that arise in international macro-processes must be considered based on this fact.
    Why doesn't it end? Because war is beneficial to many people and structures! In particular, huge funds are allocated for the maintenance of refugee camps. Without these very virtues in their souls, Western countries are very concerned about creating an image, imitating these values. So much more capable of stealing. Therefore, powerful chains of pumping funds are built around the camps ... past the refugees. And those who drive the budgets of their countries into their pockets under the guise of "assistance to refugees" are completely unprepared to lose such a wonderful channel.
    All other problems have the same cause, and also the desire of the US-led forces to fight Russia indirectly. No mysteries, no mysteries
  24. 0
    9 December 2021 17: 46
    I saw this photo when Muammar Gaddafi was still alive ... and later I saw a video with interviews with militants near these tanks and from a slightly different angle - this is not Syria.