Head of the US Department of State: Claims that Ukraine or NATO are a threat to Russia are completely wrong

83

The US Secretary of State, while on a visit to the Latvian capital, commented on the statement of the Russian President that Moscow would be provided with legally confirmed guarantees of NATO's non-proliferation to the east and the non-deployment of NATO strike weapons near Russia's borders. In Kiev and in the North Atlantic Alliance itself, this was interpreted as "a red line from the Kremlin to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO." And, starting precisely from this thesis, now they give correspondence answers to the Russian president.

According to Anthony Blinken, he is "surprised by Vladimir Putin's statement about the threat from Ukraine." Blinken called it a "bad joke." At the same time, Blinken was not informed about the "translation difficulties". Putin did not say that it is Ukraine that threatens Russia. The President of Russia stressed that the threat to the security of the Russian Federation is posed by the expansion of NATO with the approach of its military infrastructure to the Russian borders.
During his visit to Riga, the head of the US State Department stated that "the North Atlantic Alliance is defensive."



Blinken:

We do not threaten Russia, we have no aggressive intentions towards Russia.

It is for this reason that the Russian president asked for a documentary explanation of why, in this case, NATO is moving closer and closer to the Russian borders. An unambiguous answer from US officials and functionaries of NATO itself has not yet been voiced. Every time, streamlined formulations about "security in Europe", "support for democracy", "protection of European partners from Iran and North Korea" and other "noodles" are heard.

Blinken - instead of a direct answer to Moscow's question:

Claims that Ukraine or NATO are a threat to Russia are completely wrong.

Against this background, the statement of the Secretary General of the Western military bloc Jens Stoltenberg attracts attention. According to him, "the very posing of the question that Russia may have spheres of influence is unacceptable for us."

Stoltenberg:

If we accept this thesis, it turns out that Russia can control everything that its neighbors do, and they are independent states.

Russian experts, commenting on this passage of a NATO functionary, note that Stoltenberg continues to be the "talking head" of Washington, promoting the thesis that the interests and spheres of influence in the world can be exclusively with the United States. At the same time, frank encroachments on third countries are presented on a platter with the inscription "democracy". A familiar invasion screen used by the United States and NATO for a long time, no matter how trite it may sound.
83 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    2 December 2021 07: 23
    Jens Stoltenberg.
    Dead herring as always wassat turned everything upside down. And in fact - complete idiocy on the part of the alleged NATO officials.
    1. -40
      2 December 2021 07: 28
      Head of the US Department of State: Claims that Ukraine or NATO are a threat to Russia are completely wrong

      Blinkin is lying.
      1. The State Department regularly raises prices for housing and communal services.
      2. NATO wants to end our sovereignty over the people's oil and gas.
      3. And all together they, the State Department and NATO, raised the retirement age, scoundrels.
      4. Only war to the bitter end. The enemy wants to occupy the Bryansk region and hold a gay parade there.
      It's sarcasm.
      1. -19
        2 December 2021 07: 38
        Quote: Civil
        Head of the US Department of State: Claims that Ukraine or NATO are a threat to Russia are completely wrong

        Blinkin is lying.
        1. The State Department regularly raises prices for housing and communal services.
        2. NATO wants to end our sovereignty over the people's oil and gas.
        3. And all together they, the State Department and NATO, raised the retirement age, scoundrels.
        4. Only war to the bitter end. The enemy wants to occupy the Bryansk region and hold a gay parade there.

        here sarcasm is not understood.
        1. -13
          2 December 2021 07: 42
          Quote: Dead Day
          here sarcasm is not understood.

          In the morning there are many "professional patriots") by the evening the real ones will come, we'll see there)
          1. +2
            2 December 2021 08: 50
            Vadim! Well, yes, what do you think, "real patriots" come to VO in the evening, after yesterday. And with a binge, why can't you tell?
          2. +1
            2 December 2021 10: 16
            A worthy student of Goebbels
            1. -2
              2 December 2021 20: 22
              Yes Yes Yes! Everyone, of course, immediately believed Blinken! We all, of course, completely "believe" and "trust" Ukraine, NATO, the State Department and - especially - Blinken! laughing laughing laughing
        2. +15
          2 December 2021 08: 12
          Quote: Dead Day
          here sarcasm is not understood.

          and now there is no time for sarcasm
          when the weapon rattles
          it's time to decide on the orientation
          1. -8
            2 December 2021 08: 28
            Quote: Flood
            Quote: Dead Day
            here sarcasm is not understood.

            and now there is no time for sarcasm
            when the weapon rattles
            it's time to decide on the orientation

            The damned West is clattering with pipes, gas and heating. lol
            It is necessary to send a squadron of yacht owners from the Forbes of Russia list so that they begin to surround the 6th US fleet. laughing laughing
            1. +12
              2 December 2021 08: 42
              Quote: Civil
              The damned West is clattering with pipes, gas and heating

              in 41st the USSR actively supplied resources to Germany
              what did not stop her from unleashing a war

              and you would not rattle your intransigence with the Kremlin under the article on threats from NATO.

              maybe you don't know it, but by doing so you, willingly or unwillingly, demonstrate your loyalty to the other side.

              everything has its time and place
              including your sarcasm
              don't sculpt it anywhere
              what is lying around loses its value
              1. -2
                2 December 2021 09: 12
                in 41st the USSR actively supplied resources to Germany
                what did not stop her from unleashing a war

                And that the Wehrmacht with the SS is already in Poland? Is there a world war going on?
                and you would not rattle your intransigence with the Kremlin under the article on threats from NATO

                And what does the Kremlin have to do with it? Prices for housing and communal services are being raised by commercial firms, should Putin be fighting with the management company and homeowners' association in every house? Lavrov to consider a fair price for gas?
                maybe you don't know it, but by doing so you, willingly or unwillingly, demonstrate your loyalty to the other side.

                I will never be loyal to the world bourgeoisie, of which ours is a part. Let them themselves fight on stools in Davos for their interests.
                1. +2
                  2 December 2021 09: 23
                  Quote: Civil
                  And that the Wehrmacht with the SS is already in Poland?

                  are you waiting for the Nazis?
                  no one else threatens Russia from outside?
                  Quote: Civil
                  I will never be loyal to the world bourgeoisie, of which ours is a part. Let them themselves fight on stools in Davos for their interests.

                  then why are your escapades under this article?
                  the logic of sarcasm is simple and unsightly: you direct its edge to internal problems with words
                  Quote: Civil
                  Blinkin lies

                  what should it mean, given the sarcastic coloration, that Blinkin is not lying?
                  or that we are looking for enemies not there, but real enemies not outside, but inside?
                  sharp tools must be manipulated carefully so as not to chop off anything for yourself
                  1. -2
                    2 December 2021 09: 31
                    no one else threatens Russia from outside?

                    There are always threats. But there are nuclear weapons and major threats have been leveled.
                    and the real enemies are not outside, but inside?

                    Blinkin is the mouthpiece of American imperialism. There are no options.
                    Problems with the economy and the impoverishment of the population are no longer covered by the external agenda. Because sarcasm. And you have to threaten wisely. We'll all be there.
                    1. +3
                      2 December 2021 09: 40
                      Quote: Civil
                      There are always threats. But there are nuclear weapons and major threats have been leveled.

                      otherwise you do not see that it is not the United States that is threatening Russia with a nuclear baton.

                      and the NATO pack, together with those suffering from it, will join the Russophobes.
                      her leader plans to sit on the sidelines. he has no use for atomic wars.
                      Quote: Civil
                      Blinkin's mouthpiece for American imperialism

                      it's not about Blinkin, but about your inappropriate sarcasm
                  2. +2
                    2 December 2021 11: 43
                    no one else threatens Russia from outside?

                    Are you sure that Russia is more threatened by adversaries from the outside than by its own leaders from within?
                    1. +2
                      2 December 2021 13: 46
                      Quote: paul3390
                      Are you sure that Russia is more threatened by adversaries from the outside than by its own leaders from within?

                      sure
                      and to understand this you do not need to be seven inches in your forehead

                      Former officers of the tsarist army are a prime example of this.
                      scoundrels were friends with an external enemy against the Soviets
                      and those who retained their honor and love for the Motherland joined the ranks of yesterday's internal enemy in the war against the external enemy

                      everything is simple and clear
                      but sometimes you have to take off your blinders to see the obvious
            2. 0
              2 December 2021 11: 03
              And to scrub you there too.
          2. 0
            2 December 2021 09: 01
            Navodlom. Perhaps you have seen the beginning of the competition of wrestlers without rules. They stand against each other and shower each other with insults in the hope that someone will break down and do something stupid. So is Blinkin and Lavrov. In this story, I am personally interested in why Putin came up with a seemingly ridiculous statement that NATO would give Russia a written guarantee of not expanding to the east. It does not sound like Putin's style - he is cautious and experienced enough. But this is where perhaps, I hope, lies the cause of the current problems. I hope so, otherwise one can only assume that this is a declared type of the Soviet struggle for peace, but then the struggle for peace meant an invitation to the calculation of nuclear potentials and nothing more. And now? In general, everyone knows about everything - from space and from embassies.
        3. -1
          2 December 2021 09: 10
          This is vulgar
        4. 0
          2 December 2021 09: 41
          On the other hand, they understand well open podniks.
      2. +7
        2 December 2021 07: 39
        Quote: Civil
        Blinkin is lying.
        1. The State Department regularly raises prices for housing and communal services.
        2. NATO wants to end our sovereignty over the people's oil and gas.
        3. And all together they, the State Department and NATO, raised the retirement age, scoundrels.
        4. Only war to the bitter end. The enemy wants to occupy the Bryansk region and hold a gay parade there.

        1. +1
          2 December 2021 08: 11
          You are a humanist, you will put to sleep, such as they do not suffer from humanism, give them free rein, you will see.
          1. -3
            2 December 2021 08: 37
            Quote: Buhach
            You are a humanist, you will put to sleep, such as they do not suffer from humanism, give them free rein, you will see.

            Are you afraid that Soviet power will return? You are rightly afraid, you know what will happen.
            1. +7
              2 December 2021 08: 46
              Quote: Civil
              Are you afraid that Soviet power will return? You are rightly afraid, you know what will happen.

              I personally am afraid not of the Soviet regime, but of those who rush to scribble anonymous denunciations of politically unreliable alien elements.
              explain who I mean?
              1. -2
                2 December 2021 09: 14
                Quote: Flood
                I personally am afraid not of the Soviet regime, but of those who rush to scribble anonymous denunciations of politically unreliable alien elements.
                explain who I mean?

                Is the question already so?
                1. 0
                  2 December 2021 09: 24
                  Quote: Civil
                  Is the question already so?

                  this question never disappeared
            2. +3
              2 December 2021 09: 03
              Quote: Civil
              Are you afraid that Soviet power will return? You are rightly afraid, you know what will happen.

              Another increase in prices, only "at the numerous requests of workers" ???
              We know what will happen wassat
            3. +3
              2 December 2021 09: 15
              Taking into account the current leadership of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, "the return of Soviet power" does not threaten. "Loose killer", "Father of strawberries" and "Biba Bondarenko" are clowns who are not capable of anything.
              1. -4
                2 December 2021 09: 20
                Quote: Cottodraton
                Taking into account the current leadership of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, "the return of Soviet power" does not threaten. "Loose killer", "Father of strawberries" and "Biba Bondarenko" are clowns who are not capable of anything.

                I agree that only holy people from United Russia, headed by Dmitry Anatolyevich Medvedev, will lead us, someday, into a brighter future. It takes another 20-100 years.
                1. -1
                  2 December 2021 17: 02
                  Yes Yes ! Some also led, led ... for 70 years, until they finally led to the same D.A. Medvedev ... We remember, we remember!
            4. 0
              2 December 2021 11: 23
              laughing Why be afraid of the dreams of fools?
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. +9
        2 December 2021 08: 26
        Quote: Civil
        Blinkin is lying.
        1. The State Department regularly raises prices for housing and communal services.
        2. NATO wants to end our sovereignty over the people's oil and gas.
        3. And all together they, the State Department and NATO, raised the retirement age, scoundrels.
        4. Only war to the bitter end. The enemy wants to occupy the Bryansk region and spend there

        The only thing is that with the SSSS they did not touch the tariffs and age ...
        And so all the same positions - both factual and propaganda ...
        Even though the socialist USSR, even the capitalist Russian Federation, we still interfere with the United States, even in the 90s we interfered ...

        And yes - alas, this is not sarcasm ...
        1. 0
          2 December 2021 09: 17
          The only thing is that with the SSSS they did not touch the tariffs and age ...

          The main point - the USSR was a socialist state, where the goals and objectives were - the welfare of citizens. This is the main and fundamental difference. And here is the conflict of one capitalist country with another capitalist country.
          1. 0
            2 December 2021 12: 18
            Quote: Civil
            where the goals and objectives were - the welfare of citizens.

            Mmmm .... and 3 monetary reforms apparently ALSO - for the well-being of citizens? Vaughn what ...
            And then I think - what is SS Gorbunkov in the Diamond Hand 7 years after the reform specifies - "Old ?? !!!!!!!"

            Cards after the war (with the pre-war face value !!!) -also for welfare ??? !!
            1. -1
              2 December 2021 12: 43
              Quote: your1970
              Quote: Civil
              where the goals and objectives were - the welfare of citizens.

              Mmmm .... and 3 monetary reforms apparently ALSO - for the well-being of citizens? Vaughn what ...
              And then I think - what is SS Gorbunkov in the Diamond Hand 7 years after the reform specifies - "Old ?? !!!!!!!"

              Cards after the war (with the pre-war face value !!!) -also for welfare ??? !!

              What about your privatization? Closing of thousands of factories, default in 1998, collapse of the ruble in 2008, 2014, 2018-present. school closures, population cuts, optimization of everyone and everything? However, there is an answer - everything is for the elite. For the list of achievements, see the list of Forbes Russia.
              1. 0
                2 December 2021 13: 00
                Maybe you haven't noticed - but now no one is throwing SLOGS "Everything in the name of man, everything for the good of man!"?
                And then they were snobbishly hung from the stands about this one and then they would have a monetary reform, then they would tax the apple trees, then the production rates would be raised ...
                The people saw it when they say one thing and in fact another. And this duality is one of the reasons why the people did not rise for the USSR ...

                75 years have passed since the war - there is a single database on those awarded with the title of GSS ????? !!! No...
                I'm not talking about orders and medals - but there are still no top-level awards ...
                But they rattled "Nobody is forgotten, nothing is forgotten !!!" ... May 10 came and everyone together forgot for another year ...
        2. 0
          2 December 2021 09: 44
          The tariffs were very touching, "at the request of the workers."
          1. -1
            2 December 2021 10: 05
            A generation has grown up that, having seen enough leftists on YouTube, consider the USSR a branch of paradise on earth. At least they asked the parents for a change why everyone rushed in the 90th from this paradise, demolishing the doors from their hinges lol
    2. -2
      2 December 2021 12: 26
      That the United States should not have any spheres of influence as terrorist in nature.
  2. +4
    2 December 2021 07: 37
    NATO, like a cat, decided to rub the back about our borders wassat
  3. +14
    2 December 2021 07: 38
    Head of the US Department of State: Claims that Ukraine or NATO are a threat to Russia are completely wrong
    The guys are so simple ... you will even poke them with your nose into their own guano / lies, they will SPEAK with foam at the mouth. what is it ambrosia !!! they will not prove anything, they will not refute, blurted out as he wanted, distorted even according to what was written and his truncated is normal!
    Useless!
    1. +4
      2 December 2021 08: 43
      Quote: rocket757
      The guys are so simple ... you will even poke them with your nose into their own guano / lies, they will SPEAK with foam at the mouth. what is it ambrosia !!

      shyly silent about their oral promise to Gorbachev, but as they were offered to fix it in writing on paper, so immediately "Help! dumplings!" However, even having signed such an agreement, they will still violate it. They need to spit it.
      1. +3
        2 December 2021 09: 40
        Quote: Egoza
        shyly silent about their oral promise to Gorbachev,

        Come on, ashamed of them ???
        They deceived the fool, or maybe / probably something worse ... now they are proud of it.
        We will not forget, we will not forgive, ANYONE!
    2. +3
      2 December 2021 09: 27
      Quote: rocket757

      Useless!


      Good time! hi

      With them, like in a joke - listen and do the opposite ...
      1. +3
        2 December 2021 09: 41
        Welcome soldier
        There is no longer anything to listen to ... their record is stuck, they talk the same thing, in one form or another. Not interested.
        1. +1
          2 December 2021 09: 54
          These guys want to answer:
          “None of the NATO countries have the right to veto Russia's use of nuclear weapons. Whoever deserves it will get it.
          Go for it, get mad, threaten .... and wait for it to arrive. "
          1. +2
            2 December 2021 09: 57
            Sound arguments, this is an extreme measure, a retaliatory one ... and we will write it down.
    3. +2
      2 December 2021 09: 45
      This defensive alliance has never defended itself, but only attacked.
      1. +1
        2 December 2021 09: 59
        It doesn't bother them at all ...
        Although the whole world understands this, nothing, in the foreseeable future, will change ... it itself will not pass.
      2. -1
        2 December 2021 10: 19
        I believe the head of the State Department of the country, for "humane and peacekeeping" purposes, developed and was the first to use an atomic bomb against the civilian population. Yes
  4. +13
    2 December 2021 07: 39
    Liar Blinken. The bombing of Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Libya, Iraq, Syria claimed the lives of tens of thousands of people. And the survivors, including hundreds of thousands of wounded in poverty, the country is in ruins. And this is all for defense purposes. Than these countries threatened NATO ???? And there is nothing to say about the "talking head" of Washington
  5. +6
    2 December 2021 07: 40
    From all sides they surrounded their satellites, which are pumped up with weapons, constantly creep and monitor near the borders, arrange provocative maneuvers in violation of the borders - and NAGLO declare that this is not a threat at all. Yeah. SHCHAZ. am
  6. +7
    2 December 2021 07: 40
    Yes, NATO does not threaten Russia by pushing rocket launchers closer and closer to Russia's borders and organizing military bases. Real peacekeepers. NATO comes only with "MIR"
    1. 0
      2 December 2021 09: 07
      Quote: Alexander 3
      NATO comes only with "MIR"

      Don't believe me? Ask Yugoslavia. We were only on the defensive, so we immediately began to bomb Belgrade.
  7. +4
    2 December 2021 07: 54
    Hypocrisy is worse than lies.
  8. +4
    2 December 2021 07: 55
    Russia has always been a tasty morsel for the Anglo-Saxons ...
  9. +4
    2 December 2021 07: 56
    Every time, streamlined formulations about "security in Europe" are heard, "Support for democracy", "Protecting European partners from Iran and North Korea" and other "noodles".


  10. +5
    2 December 2021 08: 04
    Yes. Yes. Yeah. Only about the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, about the bombing of Yugoslavia, about Libya and Iraq, no one has yet forgotten.
  11. +4
    2 December 2021 08: 07
    We do not threaten Russia, we have no aggressive intentions towards Russia.

    The statements of the head of NATO and the actions of NATO indicate the opposite, while Ukraine, in its threats to Russia, crossed all possible and impossible borders. Russia needs to be prepared for any scenario of the development of the situation.
    1. +2
      2 December 2021 08: 17
      So the language was given to a person to hide his thoughts, which these figures are doing with success, and only one of the two scenarios is possible - there will be war or not. Well, even if Russia capitulates to the "civilized", so to speak, world.
  12. +2
    2 December 2021 08: 18
    I wonder where all these uncles and aunts go through face control before being appointed to positions. Stoltenberg has a lean face even when he tries to smile. Maybe he has gout? But the champions are still from overseas. Bolton, such a cutie. Grandma Albright is the embodiment of the American dream. Vika Nuland ... with low social responsibility. The 404s went there too. Kuleba is pretty ...
  13. -1
    2 December 2021 08: 26
    Blinken is lying without batting an eye ... a swindler.
    1. 0
      2 December 2021 08: 29
      His job is - shamelessly tryndet.
      1. -1
        2 December 2021 08: 35
        Quote: Nexcom
        His job is - shamelessly tryndet.

        Trotsky, Blikin, Goebbels - hatched from one egg.
  14. 0
    2 December 2021 08: 30
    They are waiting, preparing to attack the Donbass. Zyuzya, where is your coup? Well, at least play the piano, defuse the atmosphere
  15. 0
    2 December 2021 08: 34
    We do not threaten Russia, we have no aggressive intentions towards Russia.
    .... we do not threaten you, the "jackal" said to the goat, and ate it, leaving the horns and legs.
    Conclusion: a goat must wear a bulletproof vest, with a "Kalash" on its belly.
    1. +1
      2 December 2021 08: 35
      Russia is not a goat. Why are you so ...
      We won't be able to devour ourselves for this.
      1. 0
        2 December 2021 08: 39
        Quote: Nexcom
        Russia is not a goat. Why are you so ...

        Well, let it be - "Little Red Riding Hood", she is much smarter than a wolf and a jackal.
  16. 0
    2 December 2021 08: 36
    So let him prove .. withdraw troops from the Baltic states ... for a start, at least.
  17. +1
    2 December 2021 08: 48
    This clowning from NATO and the United States resembles a man running to Russia with an ax and a grin on his face ... who at the same time squeals that you shouldn't be afraid .. I'm kind ... that's not what you think.
  18. +2
    2 December 2021 08: 49
    do not calm down the western parasites until the SNOW BOOTS DO NOT RECEIVE!
  19. +1
    2 December 2021 09: 02
    Yeah! They are not a threat, they are a cancerous tumor on Europa's body!
  20. 0
    2 December 2021 09: 18
    Blimey! NATO is a defensive alliance !! The seas are burning, the forests are flowing, the mouse has drowned in the stone ...
  21. +2
    2 December 2021 09: 23
    Blinken - instead of a direct answer to Moscow's question:

    Claims that Ukraine or NATO are a threat to Russia are completely wrong.


    And your words are generally empty space and you have proved it many times ...
  22. +2
    2 December 2021 09: 30
    We do not threaten Russia, we have no aggressive intentions towards Russia.
    They at least agreed with each other about what to talk about. Blinken, that there are no threats and of course it is necessary to talk with Russia, but did not forget to remind about the "terrible punishments" if something happens. Immediately Stoltenberg immediately threatened and Russia could not have its own interests ... But how Kuleba cried that it was they (Ukraine) who were the outpost of the fight against Russia and immediately asked for weapons and financial assistance. In a word, the Sabbath was a success - they rinsed Russia, puffed out their cheeks, threatened and made promises.
  23. bar
    +1
    2 December 2021 09: 45
    The statements of brothers in mind from parallel reality? Or from the perpendicular?
  24. +1
    2 December 2021 10: 49
    Demagogues came running and began to shift the conversation with NATO and Blinken to the internal problems of Russia. Apparently, they do not dare to criticize the representatives of the Light of Democracy - the United States. But the patient government of Russia can be criticized without fearing for your reputation in such circles as fans of Echo of Moscow, Meduza, Dozhd, and various Novye Gazetonki ...
    It is a pity that the moderators do not care about these demagogues ...
  25. 0
    2 December 2021 11: 52
    This is how she is NATOha, white and fluffy, only in a collar with spikes and a leather whip wassat
  26. -3
    2 December 2021 14: 26
    Not a threat, I agree with him, NATO and the Ruin are a problem that can be solved, with great difficulties and losses, but solved. We have a threat inside the country in the form of fine-looking rich talkers who are ruining the state to please the enemy.
  27. 0
    2 December 2021 15: 29
    You're lying to the dog! Teeth speaks! Attention distracts! And what about recent statements about "aggression"! Smerd! Stinking dog!
  28. Two
    0
    3 December 2021 09: 26
    "During his visit to Riga, the head of the US State Department said that" the North Atlantic Alliance is defensive. "
    And from whom were Yugoslavia and Libya defended by the bombing? Huh?
  29. 0
    3 December 2021 10: 33
    The son of the Nazi criminal I. Ribbentrop, Minister of Foreign Affairs in the German government in 1938-1945, Rudolph, wrote in his memoirs:
    "Father even allowed himself in Moscow (upon signing a non-aggression pact between Germany and Soviet Russia) joking hint: The USSR could itself join the Anti-Comintern Pact."(From Prince R. Ribbentrop" Never Against Russia ")
    How they are all the same, these "ministers" of war are the same and predictable.
  30. 0
    4 December 2021 19: 20
    "We do not threaten Russia, we have no aggressive intentions towards a Russian address."
    The second part of the expression is full of lies, since the main goal of all presidents, etc. in NATO countries it is always voiced as containment and opposition to the development of Russia! Not the establishment of mutually beneficial cooperation, but on the contrary, all efforts are directed against the development of relations between Russia and anyone! These are not aggressive intentions. lol the military at all levels, in all documents register Russia as an enemy, and the armies are preparing for war specifically with Russia! Because we are a threat! feel It’s very strange on our part to be dissatisfied with the fact that NATO is setting the whole world against us, stupidly forbidding us to cooperate in all areas that may be prohibited, overthrowing governments loyal to Russia and putting in their place not just those loyal to the West, but specifically anti-Russian ones!
    Not any aggression on their part! fool and they are preparing for war, because they are waiting for us to run out of patience, or when we stupidly start to bend over to take advantage of the situation ourselves