Completion of the Ukrainian corvette "Vladimir the Great" can be with the help of Britain: some details of the agreement

93

An agreement was previously concluded between London and Kiev, providing for strengthening the combat potential of the Ukrainian fleet... It was believed that it concerns primarily the supply of British-type missile boats, but now new details of the agreements have begun to be clarified.

As reported in the western edition of Navy Recognition, in particular, we are talking about the completion of the project 58250 corvette "Vladimir the Great" by joint forces. This class was developed in 2008, the construction started in 2011 with the planned launch in 2012. It was expected that a total of 10 ships of this project would leave the stocks. In 2018, the commander of the Ukrainian Navy said that there were no funds to continue building the ship. Now there are new details of the possible implementation of the project - with possible British participation.



According to the new plans, the Vladimir Veliky corvette will be armed with one 76/62 OTO Melara cannon, one Oerlikon Millennium dual 35-mm melee system, two launchers equipped with four Neptune anti-ship missiles (Ukrainian subsonic anti-ship missiles) each, sixteen launchers for the Dnepr anti-aircraft missile and two MU90 torpedoes.

Apparently, we are talking about preliminary agreements, within the framework of which assistance from Britain in completing the ship is declared as possible. The use of the term "completion" is also conditional - in fact, now the "corvette" consists of disparate metal structures located in the factory workshops. When the ship will be assembled, it is still a question, not to mention when weapons will be placed on it, including from British "partners".

93 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    27 November 2021 13: 46
    as reported by VO in August of this year.

    According to the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense, today the readiness of "Vladimir the Great" is 17%. On the territory of the former "Black Sea Shipbuilding Plant" there are blocks 1-7 of the main hull of the ship and block 8 of the ship's superstructure.


    small business
    1. 0
      27 November 2021 13: 50
      Yes, the matter is small, to change the name to "Vladimir the Great", you need to add five more letters. And the matter will go.
      1. -1
        27 November 2021 14: 05
        Quote: tralflot1832
        five more letters must be added to "Vladimir the Great"

        front A YAK SAME
      2. -2
        27 November 2021 15: 40
        Perhaps after writing their construction will go in afterburner mode. winked
    2. +3
      27 November 2021 14: 00
      .10 years (third president and "eleventh defense minister) Plus $ 71 million" unknown. "
    3. 0
      27 November 2021 14: 21
      Yeah, the matter is small - to find a new plant, which will complete the construction and money to finance the work. And so, almost everything is already ready)))
      1. 0
        27 November 2021 15: 17
        I think it makes no sense for the Britons to invest in Ukraine, in particular ships. An unstable and unpredictable regime with multibillion-dollar debt. And they can call their ships into Ukrainian ports anyway, plus the construction of training centers (bases) that they can visit on the coast.
    4. -2
      27 November 2021 14: 24
      Quote: Flood
      small business

      Well, yes, all that's left is to start and finish! laughing laughing laughing
    5. 0
      27 November 2021 14: 52
      Quote: Flood
      small business

      Yes, yes, only 83% of production is behind
    6. -2
      27 November 2021 15: 53
      Quote: Flood
      as reported by VO in August of this year.

      According to the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense, today the readiness of "Vladimir the Great" is 17%. On the territory of the former "Black Sea Shipbuilding Plant" there are blocks 1-7 of the main hull of the ship and block 8 of the ship's superstructure.


      small business


      Meanwhile, the "fellow" gives his clown press conferences instead of real cases))
    7. 0
      28 November 2021 02: 49
      "" construction started in 2011 with the planned launch in 2012. "" how do you like this speed wassat wassat wassat )
      1. -1
        28 November 2021 02: 52
        In general, of course, "" Lavrov's phrase " bully
  2. +2
    27 November 2021 14: 02
    We are talking about the completion of the project 58250 corvette "Vladimir the Great" by joint forces.
    Why did they decide to name the corvette in honor of Putin?
    1. -4
      27 November 2021 14: 30
      Do you associate Vladimir the Great with the current leader?
      And even HIM - with the prince.
      He was definitely great. Not like the current ones.
      1. +5
        27 November 2021 14: 57
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        He was definitely great

        What is it? That he killed his brother?
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        Not like the current ones.

        Well, yes ... the present, before his bloodlust, still grow and grow
        1. +7
          27 November 2021 15: 04
          That is, the baptism of Russia (only this!) Minting coins, creating church statutes, large-scale construction of stone cities and other is it, a trifle compared to what you listed?
          It turns out in vain they erected monuments to him, painted on stamps and money, and ranked him among the saints ...
          1. +3
            27 November 2021 15: 17
            Quote: Leader of the Redskins
            That is, the baptism of Russia (only this!) Minting coins, creating church statutes, large-scale construction of stone cities and other is it, a trifle compared to what you listed?

            But his great-great-grandson Ivan-IV did little for the greatness of his country? But they do not erect monuments to him, even on the monument to the 1000th anniversary of Rus' there was no place for him ... for the Lithuanian princes, yes, but he does not ... only because he was in conflict with the ROC on the issue of power. But to Vladimir, who was never a "meek sheep", neither a pagan nor a Christian and shed blood without any remorse, so yes ... he is the one who, let's call things by their proper names, PLANTED Christianity on the lands subject to him, and WITH FIRE and with the SWORD, he is a HOLY. And in what way is he better or worse than Grozny?
            1. +2
              27 November 2021 15: 29
              Excuse me, do you live in Russia?
              If not, then I would like to inform you that over the past five years, monuments to Ivan the Terrible have been erected in Orel, Moscow (later moved to Aleksandrov), and Cheboksary.
              The series of the same name was filmed with Makovetsky in the title role.
              So no one belittles the historical significance.
              1. -1
                27 November 2021 15: 35
                Quote: Leader of the Redskins
                Excuse me, do you live in Russia?

                In Russia...
                Quote: Leader of the Redskins
                If not, then I would like to inform you that over the past five years, monuments to Ivan the Terrible have been erected in Orel, Moscow (later moved to Aleksandrov), and Cheboksary.

                Well done, only with the Moscow sequence was the opposite from Alexandrov to Moscow, to the alley of the rulers of Russia, ... but you did not list all the monuments
                In Kansk, Krasnoyarsk Territory, artist Vladislav Gultyaev erected a monument to Ivan the Terrible in the form of a stake, thus expressing his protest. “You shouldn't erect monuments to people who used targeted terror against their own people. Well, I also wanted to remind you that the times when people were tortured, killed just like that, killed by order, are not so far away. Our grandfathers and women remember this perfectly, but we are their descendants. If we do not want to repeat the same mistakes, we must know about this and firmly believe that this is unacceptable, "says artist Vladislav Gultyaev

                Are there many similar monuments to Vladimir, who also used terror against his own people? The image created by the ROC still dominates part of the population
                Quote: Leader of the Redskins
                The series of the same name was filmed with Makovetsky in the title role.

                And also the film "Tsar" by Pavel Lungin with Mamonov in the title role, where the Moscow tsar puts shoes on DIRTY feet and this in the morning, getting out of bed .... and generally a "murderer and bloodsucker", and a deceitful one ...
                1. +3
                  27 November 2021 16: 13
                  Quote: svp67
                  Well done

                  you will decide whether monuments to Ivan the Terrible are being erected or not
                  you deduced a whole theory based on the fact that there are no monuments

                  and then with enviable ease start in your judgments from the suddenly obvious fact that monuments to Grozny are being erected
                  1. 0
                    27 November 2021 16: 17
                    Quote: Flood
                    you will decide whether monuments to Ivan the Terrible are being erected or not
                    you deduced a whole theory based on the fact that there are no monuments

                    I will perfectly clarify my position .. They are placed much less and with HUGE difficulty, they are often forced to refuse this, in contrast to the monuments to Prince Vladimir. Although Ivan IV made for the greatness of Russia more than Vladimir.
                    Will this point of view satisfy you?
                    1. +2
                      27 November 2021 16: 21
                      Quote: svp67
                      Will this point of view satisfy you?

                      accurate presentation of thoughts without conscious or unconscious distortion of facts is always preferable to the opposite
                      1. 0
                        27 November 2021 16: 23
                        Quote: Flood
                        accurate presentation of thoughts without conscious or unconscious distortion of facts is always preferable to the opposite

                        Somehow ornate ... but more specifically, you can?
                      2. +3
                        27 November 2021 16: 32
                        Quote: svp67
                        Somehow ornate ... but more specifically, you can?

                        you have sinned against the truth
                        your accusation against the Russian Orthodox Church was based on this
                        when you were pointed out that your words were wrong, instead of admitting that you were wrong, you found new reasons for dissatisfaction

                        with an interlocutor who ignores any arguments and facts, if they do not fit into his logic, it is difficult to find a common language and build a dialogue
                      3. +1
                        27 November 2021 16: 36
                        Quote: Flood
                        you have sinned against the truth
                        your accusation against the Russian Orthodox Church was based on this

                        Forgive me, but now the ROC does not have the power that it used to be and something is working out, but name me at least one monument to Ivan IV before the 90s of the 20th century? Please do me a favor
                        Quote: Flood
                        with an interlocutor who ignores any arguments and facts, if they do not fit into his logic, it is difficult to find a common language and build a dialogue

                        And how is this expressed in the dialogue with me?
                      4. +1
                        27 November 2021 16: 47
                        Quote: svp67
                        name me at least one monument to Ivan IV before the 90s of the 20th century?

                        what does this have to prove?
                        the fact that one of the greatest Russian sovereigns was considered a controversial figure and was largely slandered?
                        yes, no one argues with that
                        how difficult it is to dispute the fact that now the role of Ivan the Terrible in the history of Russia is being rethought and finding a new assessment
                        Quote: svp67
                        And how is this expressed in the dialogue with me?

                        in the fact that you see the results of the reign of Vladimir the Great as insignificant
                        you are not interested in real facts since you are not sympathetic to this historical figure
                      5. -1
                        27 November 2021 17: 04
                        Quote: Flood
                        how difficult it is to dispute the fact that now the role of Ivan the Terrible in the history of Russia is being rethought and finding a new assessment

                        I agree ...
                        Quote: Flood
                        in the fact that you see the results of the reign of Vladimir the Great as insignificant

                        But here I disagree ... They are NOT INSIGNIFICANT, they are LESS SIGNIFICANT than that of his great-grandson
                      6. 0
                        27 November 2021 17: 05
                        Quote: svp67
                        they are LESS SIGNIFICANT than his great-grandson

                        so everyone needs to pay tribute
                      7. -1
                        27 November 2021 17: 07
                        Quote: Flood
                        so everyone needs to pay tribute

                        Absolutely agree
                        Quote: Flood
                        you are not interested in real facts since you are not sympathetic to this historical figure
                        And what else besides the implantation of Orthodoxy in his credit? I do not evaluate historical figures from the standpoint of "sympathetic-not sympathetic", he lived in his time according to those laws. In his exaltation, it is more the merit of those to whom his deed turned out to be beneficial and who were then pressed by Ivan IV.
                      8. +2
                        27 November 2021 17: 21
                        Quote: svp67
                        And what else, besides the implantation of Orthodoxy in his credit?


                        finding the answer to this question is not so difficult
                      9. 0
                        28 November 2021 11: 08
                        Let's just say: "Not rich ..."
                        Especially about the Cherven cities ... To recapture these cities from the predecessors of the Czech nation, so that they would then, for many centuries, become Polish ... yeah
                      10. 0
                        28 November 2021 19: 35
                        Quote: svp67
                        Let's just say: "Not rich ..."

                        10th century, the formation of Russia
                        and then you take offense at my words
                        Quote: Flood
                        with an interlocutor who ignores any arguments and facts, if they do not fit into his logic, it is difficult to find a common language and build a dialogue

                        your follow-up
                        Quote: svp67
                        To recapture these cities from the predecessors of the Czech nation, so that they later, for many centuries, would become Polish

                        talk about your bias and bias
                        have mercy, what is Vladimir's fault?
                        is it his fault that later his conquests could not hold?
                        it's somehow strange to ask about such obvious things
                      11. 0
                        29 November 2021 08: 48
                        Quote: Flood
                        have mercy, what is Vladimir's fault?

                        No, it’s not his fault. There is guilt in fratricide, for the sake of power ...
          2. -6
            27 November 2021 15: 34
            That is, the baptism of Russia
            ... eyewitnesses of the baptism of Rus tell that this bloody baptism was. a lot of people disappeared ... and that's interesting ... why Vovka the Great paid tribute to the Chingizites-Busurmans ... but Dimka Donskoy Busurman put cancer ... well, practice wit
            1. +2
              27 November 2021 16: 03
              Forgive me, but you do not know the story well ... What "Vovka the Great" paid tribute to the Chingizites-Basurmans? At the expense of your friend Dimka from the Donskoy, he put the impostor Mamai in an uncomfortable position, but Chingizit Tokhtamysh came and already put your friend in an uncomfortable position and burned him down, while taking ALL the tribute
              1. -6
                27 November 2021 16: 25
                Sorry, but you don't know the story well ..
                ... no, I don't know the story badly ... but you, Seryozha, missed the trocha ... Tokhtamysh did not ripen for the Battle of Kulikovo ... do you see Mamayka's end. Well, in general, Tokhta died in 1400, and what has to do with being on the run .. because Toha betrayed the golden horde by submitting to Tamerlane
                1. 0
                  27 November 2021 16: 30
                  Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
                  Tokhtamysh was not in time for the Battle of Kulikovo

                  And why did he have to get there? There, the Grand Duke of Moscow Dmitry, was completely his ally and repulsed his enemy ...
                  Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
                  well, in general, Tokhta died in 1400

                  But before that, he managed to remind Russia who is the Boss here ...
                  Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
                  what has to do with being on the run .. because toha betrayed the golden horde by submitting to Tamerlane

                  Well, they had their own showdowns there ... which touched us sideways.
                  1. 0
                    27 November 2021 16: 35
                    Well, they had their own showdowns there ... which touched us sideways.
                    ... yes, but only four busurmans died by their own death ... Chingiz, Batu. Jochi and the actual busurman Timur, and the rest ... well, you understand
            2. +3
              27 November 2021 16: 18
              Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
              why Vovka the Great paid tribute to the Chingizites-Busurmans

              Mongol-Tatars came to Russia almost two centuries after the death of Vladimir Krasnoe Solnyshko
              1. -3
                27 November 2021 16: 32
                Quote: Flood
                Mongol-Tatars came to Russia almost two centuries after the death of Vladimir Krasnoe Solnyshko

                And here is the question. Prince Igor of Kiev was killed by his tributaries, the Drevlyans, out of a desire to collect the "TATAR tribute" again in one year. And this is half a century before the birth of Vladimir, how is it?
                1. +3
                  27 November 2021 16: 36
                  Quote: svp67
                  Prince Igor of Kiev was killed by his tributaries, the Drevlyans, out of a desire to collect the "TATAR tribute" again in one year.

                  without reference to the source, how can I guess what you are talking about?
              2. -2
                27 November 2021 16: 39
                almost two centuries after the death of Vladimir Krasnoe Solnyshko
                ... but don't kick it ... Seryoga just beguiled Prince Vladimir by Prince Vladimir Dmitry Donskoy
              3. -3
                27 November 2021 16: 51
                Mongol-Tatars came to Russia almost two centuries after the death of Vladimir
                ... oops novodlom .... and who were the Pechenegs ??? who shamelessly plundered Kievan Rus regularly ...
                1. +1
                  27 November 2021 17: 06
                  Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
                  . and who were the Pechenegs ??? who shamelessly robbed Kievan Rus regularly

                  it is known for certain that not Chingizids
                  1. -1
                    27 November 2021 18: 52
                    it is known for certain that not Chingizids
                    ... then who were the Pechenegs ...
                    1. +1
                      27 November 2021 19: 03
                      Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
                      then who were the Pechenegs ..

                      Genghisids - descendants of Genghis Khan
                      1. 0
                        27 November 2021 19: 47
                        Genghisids - descendants of Genghis Khan
                        ... but that's not true ... the Polovtsians were Tatars ... then the Khazars ... somewhat much opposed to the Mongols ... and to be more specific there were Nokhchi ... that's the truth. new mod ... by the way, my mother was a Khazar. and your father is from the Bryansk region ... learn history and you will be happy
                      2. +2
                        27 November 2021 19: 57
                        Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
                        that's not true ... the Polovtsians were Tatars

                        what is not true?
                        I wrote to you that the Genghisids are the descendants of Genghis Khan
                        Draw your own conclusions
                        after all, you stated above
                        Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
                        Vovka the Great paid tribute to the Chingizites-Busurmans

                        that does not fit into any gate
                        because between Genghis Khan and Vladimir Red Sun two centuries

                        Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
                        learn history and you will be happy

                        it's funny to read this parting word from you
                        you managed to mess up so much in several comments
                        and dismiss me from your familiarity
                      3. 0
                        27 November 2021 20: 00
                        . on this we will complete
          3. -2
            27 November 2021 17: 39
            What are these stone cities in the 11th century, I'm embarrassed to ask? You are our homebrew historian.))
      2. 0
        27 November 2021 15: 11
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        Do you associate Vladimir the Great with the current leader?
        And even HIM - with the prince.
        He was definitely great. Not like the current ones.

        why he got it))))))))))), Prince of Novgorod, Grand Duke of Kiev
      3. 0
        27 November 2021 16: 02
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        And even HIM - with the prince.

        And the prince did not have a "great" prefix, but a "red sun". It's a shame not to know.
        1. -2
          27 November 2021 17: 08
          And the prince did not have a "great" prefix, but a "red sun".
          ...... yeah uh
          then when the rivers filled with blood
    2. +1
      27 November 2021 14: 45
      A credible question, if I were Putin, I would give you an award, it's a pity he won't read it. good
      1. 0
        27 November 2021 16: 06
        Quote: Ros 56
        If I were Putin, I would give you an award, it's a pity he won't read it.

        If this happened and it became known about it, then, I'm afraid, the entire local opposition would sharply turn into supporters of Putin and it would become extremely boring here ...
    3. 0
      27 November 2021 14: 47
      That would be unsinkable and eternal.
    4. -1
      29 November 2021 17: 20
      For them, Putin is king and god. If you look at how often his name is mentioned in horse racing and in Russia, it turns out that they constantly talk about him there.
  3. +1
    27 November 2021 14: 06
    Well, apparently, according to the standard, the ukrov will once again be bred. We make a publication about the next contracts with the interview (of course, free) of the next ex, we rush with it like a bag, we regulate an office abroad and under that desk again we run with a bag (like they are ready to give money only) and as soon as we immediately dissolve into the sunset of the Florida or Caribbean sun.
  4. 0
    27 November 2021 14: 07
    Yes, they have plans there, one snag is financial, they don't have these finances at all, or almost completely! °
    1. +1
      27 November 2021 14: 26
      There are 1,7 billion pounds of money that have been borrowed.

      Ukraine and Great Britain signed a loan agreement to support the Ukrainian fleet in the amount of 1,7 billion pounds sterling... This was reported by the Office of the President following a meeting between Volodymyr Zelensky and British Defense Secretary Ben Wallace.
  5. -1
    27 November 2021 14: 08
    Completion of the Ukrainian corvette "Vladimir the Great" can be with the help of Britain: some details of the agreement
    ... As an expert on that side of Kuev said, they are so cunning that they manage to steal TWO from a lem / lard of help!
    So sho Britons, get ready to help like three corvettes or one cruiser !!! can one frigate and slap.
    1. 0
      27 November 2021 14: 23
      With what fright will the Anglo-Saxons help Banderasts raise their shipbuilding? It is much more profitable to sell them your old stuff - the problem of disposal is being solved, and besides, money is earned on this - a double benefit.
      1. 0
        27 November 2021 14: 59
        Probably, the word "help" should be put in quotation marks right away! The task will not do anything, they will take it with interest .... the last trousers or skin, from the people, the locals themselves will rip off and find they will return, with interest, the EU with but!
    2. +1
      27 November 2021 16: 46
      Quote: rocket757

      So sho Britons, get ready to help like three corvettes or one cruiser !!! can one frigate and slap.


      And he can only be at the wall ...
      1. 0
        27 November 2021 17: 05
        Smartly speaking, they have there, competencies and other, highly qualified, lost for a long time. Without restoring it, the "Titanic" will turn out to sail no further than the dock doors ...
        1. +2
          27 November 2021 21: 10
          I'm afraid that even the chavn will no longer be able to cook it up ...
          1. +1
            27 November 2021 21: 25
            Let the brazen have a headache ...
  6. -1
    27 November 2021 14: 20
    Even the Martians won't help them now. Ukroverfam kirdyk has already come.
    1. -4
      27 November 2021 14: 35
      Sure?
      Go to the Nibulon website.
      Read, look and be surprised.
      1. 0
        27 November 2021 14: 42
        lol If you read what they write on the fences, you would be even more surprised. lol
        1. -3
          27 November 2021 14: 47
          To deny the obvious is the lot of armored stubborn people. There is also an official website, photos of finished ships, a register, and so on.
          But if you use information exclusively from board media, then what are you doing on the Internet?
          1. 0
            27 November 2021 15: 13
            I am surprised that you are really an armored stubborn stubborn, since you draw conclusions from one phrase. Well, to each his own, you probably were not there when God handed out brains to people, which is a pity.
            1. +1
              27 November 2021 20: 02
              Well, what was your previous post about? I posted the facts. You climbed in with the fence. Do you have something to say on the topic or will you continue to read and write on picket fence?
              1. 0
                28 November 2021 08: 50
                And to the fact that the shallow ones after the story with the Skripals dropped below the city sewer, I generally keep quiet about the Ukronatsiks. Trust them, not respect yourself.
                1. 0
                  28 November 2021 09: 25
                  Back to basics ...
                  I named to the opponent the company, the successor of the Nikolaev plant "Liman", which has been building tugs, barges, floating cranes and other vessels since 2013. There is a website, statistics and so on.
                  Then you appear with a fence.
                  When asked what the speech is about, you start rubbing in about the British.
                  Sorry, how many parallel realities are you in at the same time?
                  Please spend its logical chain from the Nibulon plant to the Skripals
                  1. -2
                    28 November 2021 09: 42
                    Briefly for the beginning: LLC agricultural enterprise "NIBULON"

                    Industry Agriculture, shipbuilding
                    Products Grain, corn, sunflower, rapeseed, etc.
                    As for shipbuilding, this is a civilian focus, the logistics required by this office for the export of its agricultural products. The fact that in Nikolaev nothing of the serious shipbuilding remained, in my opinion, is not a secret for anyone - bankruptcy, sir.
                    Further in order - Skripals, or rather nonsense about them, this is the level for which the shallow-shaven politicians have descended, who contacted Bandera's idiots in order to warm their hands on them. What
                    do you still not understand?
                2. -1
                  28 November 2021 09: 30
                  Don't bother, though. I went to your page. Apparently, you are either a bum, constantly sticking out at the monitor, or an employee of a troll factory, working out silversmiths for the number of posts - otherwise your meaningless stream of empty splashes defies explanation.
                  I'm not interested in talking to a writer on fences.
                  1. -1
                    28 November 2021 09: 47
                    I absolutely agree, you are not interested, because the Redskins did not know how to read. fool
  7. -4
    27 November 2021 14: 28
    bully The British and the Ukrainians will build the Vladimir the Great corvette. The deflection before the GDP is unambiguous. lol Ze does not pull on the great, even if he fits on a stool.
  8. -2
    27 November 2021 14: 40
    Shikoko, shikoko will take years for this, the metal is already tired of waiting for the completion of this construction / sorry completion / rebuilding.
  9. 0
    27 November 2021 14: 48
    YES WOULD BE SAWED AND HANDED ON METAL - IT'S NO LONGER WORTH ANNOUNCED INFUSIONS! AND FROM THE OTHER WAY TO LOOK ON WHAT THEY NEED TO LEARN AND DUCK IN POCKETS.
  10. 0
    27 November 2021 14: 57
    It was expected that a total of 10 ships of this project would leave the stocks. In 2018, the commander of the Ukrainian Navy said that there were no funds to continue building the ship.

    This has already happened. So on July 27.07.21, 2, after a trip to Turkey, Zelensky said that he had agreed with Turkey on the construction of 140 corvettes for Ukraine, for XNUMX billion dollars. And after a while, the Consul General of Ukraine in Istanbul, D. Haman, denied this as not being true.
    And what about the pop artist Zelensky about the veracity of the text that he should voice. The main thing is to present it beautifully to the public. You can't drink professionalism!
    1. -2
      28 November 2021 16: 10
      I don’t want to upset you, but here on public, probably from 5 articles, it came out about these corvettes and they are being built in Turkey ahead of schedule, why are you calming yourself without seeing objectivity and running away from reality? We need to renew our fleet in the Black Sea at an accelerated pace, and not laugh and calm ourselves down. While people like you are laughing at them, they have built or received from 3 dozen new boats for various purposes, 2 minesweepers and 8 large British missile boats are on the way, three quite modern Turkish missile corvettes. And it is already a given that the next 5-6 years it will be in their fleet. And knowing the beggars, during this time they will still beg from the same Americans, British or EU countries some kind of ships and weapons on them.
  11. -1
    27 November 2021 15: 22
    Englishmen, well, finish building these raguli, pelvis. After all, they will be stolen or exchanged for bacon. And so, at least the weddings will roll.
  12. 0
    27 November 2021 15: 23
    so they have a coup soon when to build
    1. +2
      27 November 2021 15: 55
      Quote: singless
      so they have a coup soon when to build

      Do you think they won't have time to "cut" in four days? And then they have an invasion in a few weeks, and then ... there are a lot of plans
  13. -2
    27 November 2021 15: 34
    They won't be in time!
    The agony of a "failed state" that pissed off everything
    including the largest shipbuilding in the USSR and Europe, is coming to a natural end.
    Shipbuilding in Kerch, Sevastopol and Feodosia is already being restored after returning home,
    in Nikolaev. Kherson, Kiev - will recover after reunification
  14. -1
    27 November 2021 16: 40
    It would be more useful to strengthen the air force and air defense.
  15. -1
    27 November 2021 16: 44
    In 2018, the commander of the Ukrainian Navy said that there were no funds to continue building the ship. Now there are new details of the possible implementation of the project - with possible British participation.


    Something tells me that it's not just about the means ...
  16. -2
    28 November 2021 16: 00
    Guys, I don't understand from the comments, why are we happy and why are we laughing? Let me remind you that 8 years ago after the return of Crimea, we left Ukraine virtually without a fleet, the only combat ship is the Sagaidachny frigate with artillery weapons, it did not carry any threat. And now, in 8 years, they themselves have built or received new ones under three dozen different kinds of patrol and armored boats, restored all kinds of ships from old ones, and in the next 5 years they will receive at least 3 more modern Turkish corvettes, 2 minesweepers and 8 missile boats with displacement and armament are comparable with small missile corvettes, and now, in fact, a full-fledged missile frigate. And you need to understand that the British are not Ukrainians, they will follow and try to make sure that for their money from this frigate there is a sense and on time, it is profitable for them that Ukraine would divert the forces of Russia to itself as much as possible. And if you take into account that in the Black Sea, in terms of the power of the fleet, it is not sad, not us, but the Turks and here also Ukraine are not weakly boosted while we are laughing, then this is not so happy. Now they will write to me about our fleet, they say we will transfer from other formations and strengthen, but from where? In the East, there are at least 2 US aircraft carrier groups, the third-largest Japanese fleet in the world, and Australia and South Korea are allies of the United States. In the West, British, French, Italians. In the South, the Turks, another US Aircraft Carrier Group, the Greeks and now also pump up Ukraine. But we are smiling here, it's funny ... Ukraine has not built this Corvette itself in 15 or 20 years ... maybe it didn’t build it badly, because now the British will finish and finish building not a Corvette, but a full-fledged missile frigate with modern weapons. And while we continue to laugh, and of the entire composition of the World Cup of the Fleet, 20% percent of comparatively modern ships have been launched at least from the 2000s, everything else is the 70s, 80s, the beginning of the 90s, but what can I say is the flagship of the World Championship of the Fleet we have this Cruiser "Moskva" at the end of the 70s of construction and about the same condition as the newer aircraft carrier "Kuznetsov" which is ten years newer, but the condition is understandable ... weapons that will be on them in Ukraine in 5 years there will be a completely combat-ready squadron, which may not fight with us, but will constantly divert all the forces of the World Championship of the Russian Fleet, and what would it be on a permanent basis, as now there will be US missile destroyers , then the missile frigates of Britain or France. But judging from the comments, we will oversleep this too, we will tell each other how great we are, and at this time in Ukraine there are 170 army and 000 national guards with armored vehicles, in 60 years already with a full-fledged squadron, in about ten years the Air Force will probably appear with the help of the same USA, Britain, Canada or someone else. And we will all smile and laugh.
    1. 0
      29 November 2021 13: 52
      Neither the British will have time to build, nor the Ukrainians to saw it! You just forgot that Pan Zelensky appointed a war with Russia "in the afternoon". And hosh-no-hosh, and after the New Year, Russia will have to attack Ukraine.
      1. -2
        29 November 2021 15: 21
        Listen, well, be realistic, you are not a schoolboy) It is clear that no one will fight with us, they said this in the past and last year, but the war never happened. This is politics and it is profitable for them, they strain us by the fact that in the current economic situation so much money has to be put into the defense industry, while the sanctions keep on us, put pressure on our large economic projects like Nord Stream, and from above there are also quite a few quite modern weapons either for free, or get it for a penny. The main thing is to say that "Russia will attack". And the Frigate will be completed by the British, if the business is already tied to their money, then the Britons are not used to building one ship for 15 years and it is not clear where to lose money, for them, as well as for the Turks, the reputation is not an empty place.
  17. 0
    29 November 2021 13: 49
    It is absolutely essential to give the non-brothers a pair of battleships and aircraft carriers! Let the whole economy of the non-sale plant work for them!