"This is not a Khokhloma, but a Gorodets painting": Roscosmos commented on the design of the Soyuz-2.1a rocket and its preparation for launch from Baikonur

169

At the Baikonur cosmodrome, the process of installing the Soyuz-2.1a rocket on the launch site has been completed. This rocket attracted the attention of netizens after the publication of its photographs. Users noted that Roskosmos continues to "exercise in the original design" of spacecraft and launch vehicles.

Several custom comments:



At Baikonur, a rocket is being installed, painted under "Khokhloma".

The design is original, no doubt about it. The main thing is to cope with the tasks set.

Meanwhile, in Roscosmos itself, commenting on the appearance of the launch vehicle, they note that this is "not Khokhloma, but Gorodets painting." According to Dmitry Rogozin, who heads the above-mentioned department, Soyuz-2.1a is decorated with just such a painting at the request of the head of the Nizhny Novgorod region, Gleb Nikitin.

Rogozin writes that such a request from the Nizhny Novgorod governor was received in honor of the 800th anniversary of the city.



Dmitry Rogozin:

The rocketeers appreciated the folk patterns.

The process of installing the launch vehicle in the launch system was completed at around 8:00 Moscow time. At the moment, autonomous pre-launch tests of the systems and assemblies of the launch vehicle, the spacecraft and the launch complex itself at Baikonur are beginning.

"This is not a Khokhloma, but a Gorodets painting": Roscosmos commented on the design of the Soyuz-2.1a rocket and its preparation for launch from Baikonur

The general assembly of the launch vehicle and the Progress-MS18 spacecraft at Baikonur took place last Saturday - October 23rd. The structure was installed at the launch site of the site No. 31 of Baikonur. Progress-MS18 is fueled with fuel and compressed gases.
169 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    25 October 2021 09: 57
    Color spacesuits, spacesuits for matryoshka !!! Ugh.
    1. -5
      25 October 2021 10: 03
      No need to waste time on trifles right away, let the windows be tinted, underestimated and put on alloy wheels so that everything is kid-like. Well, the subwoofer in the trunk. laughing
      1. +3
        25 October 2021 10: 05
        Quote: Civil
        No need to waste time on trifles right away, let the windows be tinted, underestimated and put on alloy wheels so that everything is kid-like.

        Do you want to issue diesel locomotives for delivering the rocket to the start? laughing
        1. +2
          25 October 2021 10: 10
          Quote: Vladimir_2U
          Quote: Civil
          No need to waste time on trifles right away, let the windows be tinted, underestimated and put on alloy wheels so that everything is kid-like.

          Do you want to issue diesel locomotives for delivering the rocket to the start? laughing

          I propose to replace them with steam locomotives! It will be as a symbol of stability and commitment to proven technologies and people. laughing
          1. +5
            25 October 2021 16: 40
            Leafing through old newspapers:
            (8 Oct 2020)

            Although the main news today, perhaps, is that Rogozin announced negotiations with NASA about the delivery of astronauts using trampolines.

            "We have gained (at SpaceX - ed.) Sufficient experience to send representatives of our crews," Rogozin said.

            According to him, on Tuesday, talks will be held with a NASA representative on the possibility of coordinating cross-flights (US astronauts on Russian ships and Russian cosmonauts on American ships) and crew approval.
        2. +3
          25 October 2021 11: 34
          The Indians have the most beautiful tanks, and we have missiles!



          Previously, our rockets were simply the best, but now the most beautiful. Which, too, I think is not bad!

          But, unfortunately, the Indians are still a long way off. It would be necessary to add more dances more energetically ... But the beginning is already there and this is the main thing! And what? It won't get any worse! And let all the haters choke on their own bile !!! And traditionally, do not forget ours - the dogs are barking the caravan is coming!
          1. +4
            25 October 2021 22: 45
            Quote: Stas157
            We used to have the best rockets and now the most beautiful.

            “Girl, I was told to put a stamp on you. And which one to you? Real or fake? Mmm ... What's the difference? Fufelny - prettier, the real one is more expensive. "©
        3. +8
          25 October 2021 12: 22
          Quote: Vladimir_2U
          Do you want to issue diesel locomotives for delivering the rocket to the start? laughing


          By the way, the appearance of the new Russian TM-23 shunting diesel locomotive:

          1. +5
            25 October 2021 16: 53
            Doubts immediately crept into your abbreviation TM-23 for a diesel locomotive, TEM23 would be correct (a diesel locomotive with electric transmission, shunting, type 23) and not otherwise!
            1. +1
              25 October 2021 22: 27
              Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT
              Doubts immediately crept into your abbreviation TM-23 for a diesel locomotive, TEM23 would be correct (a diesel locomotive with electric transmission, shunting, type 23) and not otherwise!


              Perhaps I do not understand diesel locomotives and wrote it by ear. And the abbreviation of TM is somehow closer and dearer to me. laughing There, by the way, it is written in the original on the door TEM23-0001, just the engine of this forum compresses the picture
          2. +2
            25 October 2021 19: 38
            Quote: slipped
            By the way, the appearance of the new Russian TM-23 shunting diesel locomotive:

            And this is a photo of the newest tram, which, instead of the promised launch into the series, ended up in an open-air museum. wink
            1. +4
              25 October 2021 22: 33
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              And this is a photo of the newest tram, which, instead of the promised launch into the series, ended up in an open-air museum. wink


              This is a photo of the hull design, not a full-fledged tram, unlike the full-fledged diesel locomotive in the photo above. UVZ trams, which went into series, had other bodies.



              By the way, continuing the tram theme, the Vostochny cosmodrome will have a light metro based on a new multi-section tram.
      2. +2
        25 October 2021 11: 25
        Quote: Civil
        Well, the subwoofer in the trunk

        backlight still needs
    2. nnm
      +28
      25 October 2021 10: 24
      I don’t understand why you, colleague, were given so many "minuses". Apparently, cheers for patriots, the form is more important than the content. It's like covering the crumbling huts with shields with beautiful pictures of a brighter future for the arrival of the leadership. And instead of discussing the declining number of launches, the loss of leadership in astronautics, we will shoot films in space, spending a lot of money on this, discuss Khokhloma or Gzhel, etc.
      It is also necessary to arrange an all-Russian poll - how is it more correct to sanctify a rocket created in the days of the USSR with water - from top to bottom, or from bottom to top. This will definitely give a sharp leap in the national cosmonautics.
      1. +15
        25 October 2021 10: 32
        Quote: nnm
        I don’t understand why you, colleague, were given so many "minuses". Apparently, cheers for patriots, the form is more important than the content.

        Come on, there are pluses, which means that I'm not the only one who is "expensive and rich", neither to the village nor to the city, annoying. And the painting to the place, in my opinion, should be like this!
      2. -12
        25 October 2021 12: 30
        Quote: nnm
        I don’t understand why you, colleague, were given so many "minuses".


        For the idiocy of rationalization proposals.

        Quote: nnm
        Apparently, cheers for patriots, the form is more important than the content.


        There is nothing wrong with the content. As usual: 470 kg of refueling fuel, 420 liters of drinking water in the Rodnik tanks, 40 kg of air and oxygen in cylinders, as well as 1 kg of equipment and materials in the cargo hold, including resource equipment and maintenance equipment for onboard systems, stowage for space experiments, medical and hygiene controls, garments, standard meals and fresh produce.

        Quote: nnm
        It's like covering the crumbling huts with shields with beautiful pictures of a brighter future for the arrival of the leadership.


        Do you still do that? Cool.

        Quote: nnm
        And instead of discussing the declining number of launches,


        Lies. On average, we have 25 launches per year. This is enough for now, given that the main groupings are deployed.

        Quote: nnm
        loss of leadership in astronautics,


        Lies. Russia is one of the recognized leaders in space exploration.

        Quote: nnm
        we will shoot films in space, spending a lot of money on this, discussing Khokhloma or Gzhel, etc.


        Russia can shoot films and design missiles ... as opposed to .... The leader.

        Quote: nnm
        It is also necessary to arrange an all-Russian poll - how is it more correct to sanctify a rocket created in the days of the USSR with water - from top to bottom, or from bottom to top. This will definitely give a sharp leap in the national cosmonautics.


        Mriya maydanutyh .... from envy.
        1. nnm
          +13
          25 October 2021 12: 38
          I can only repeat the gesture that I want to repeat when reading such delights from the hat-hangers:

          1. That is, the "idiocy of rationalization proposals" is not in the painting of the rocket, but in the fact that a colleague expressed reasonable doubts about the advisability of these actions? I understand ...
          2. What relation does the shape (coloring) have to the content (useful output load, fuel weight, etc.)? Would the indicators have worsened without this? Piiiiiimaaayu ....
          3. Even how they do it. And in your parallel universe, no? Even in Moscow itself, the streets along which corteges of celestials fly, are served and improved much better than the rest.
          4. Perhaps, on average, taking into account the Soviet period, you also have 25 launches, but if my memory serves me, then last year there were only 17.
          Enough? Both the messenger and the liana have been deployed to a full grouping, right? Ponyeeeeeeeee ...
          5. Yeah ... from first place to third. It reminded me of an anecdote - the American athlete came in the penultimate of the two participants, and ours the second.
          6. and maybe make a film, and paint it ... but create your own orbital station as in the USSR, or a new heavy rocket? No?! Is it not enough paint, or just didn't choose Khokhloma or Gzhel?
          7. "Mriya maydanutyh .... from envy." - again I can't resist:
          1. -19
            25 October 2021 12: 41
            Quote: nnm
            I can only repeat the gesture that I want to repeat when reading such delights from the hat-hangers:


            Envy, envy ... laughing You can even hang yourself. laughing Enough for soap and rope?
            1. nnm
              +7
              25 October 2021 13: 23
              Colleague, could you choose words and phrases in dialogue?
              1. -14
                25 October 2021 13: 24
                Quote: nnm
                Colleague, could you choose words and phrases in dialogue?


                From our home to yours. laughing Below I have selected both words and expressions.
                1. nnm
                  +7
                  25 October 2021 13: 29
                  That's why I don't like the Sharikovs, because they are still talking nonsense, but the most outrageous thing is that you say her categorically and confidently!
                  Lord, you even confuse "higher" and "lower", you are a highly respected cosmonaut.
                  1. -8
                    25 October 2021 13: 33
                    Quote: nnm
                    That's why I don't like the Sharikovs, because they are still talking nonsense, but the most outrageous thing is that you say her categorically and confidently!


                    Watching Bulgakov from you and rushing. Have you reviewed the movie? Do you impose on your virtuality? laughing

                    Quote: nnm
                    Lord, you even confuse "higher" and "lower", you are a highly respected cosmonaut.


                    I love it when they start to cling to the spelling with grammar in the topic. laughing Because there is nothing more to answer on the subject.

                    The message is posted "below" on this footcloth from your "above". So clear? laughing
                    1. nnm
                      +10
                      25 October 2021 13: 56
                      Oh, now in the 21st century, the coordinates of a one-vector axis relative to a conditional starting point would be called spelling and grammar. In truth, with such "patriots" Russia does not need any enemies!
                      1. -5
                        25 October 2021 13: 58
                        Quote: nnm
                        Oh, now would be in the 21st century


                        Am I looking at you in a picture looped? Are you hanging? lol It happens.
                      2. nnm
                        +5
                        25 October 2021 14: 04
                        Yes you are right. And I spent so impermissibly a lot of time communicating with you. Good luck, colleague, and thanks for the dialogue.
                      3. -7
                        25 October 2021 14: 05
                        Quote: nnm
                        Yes you are right. And I spent so impermissibly a lot of time communicating with you. Good luck, colleague, and thanks for the dialogue.


                        "When there is nothing to answer, then they always refer to the lack of time" - not mine. lol
                  2. -3
                    25 October 2021 14: 40
                    talk nonsense, but the most outrageous thing is that you say it categorically and confidently!
                    And this is said by the person who assured me that there is NO sewage system in London and everything drains directly into the Thames laughing Despite the fact that I see the Thames every day (and smell smile ) in real life.
          2. -2
            26 October 2021 06: 57
            And nothing that the Russian economy is only 15-20% of the economies of China and the United States, and we can still launch rockets into space and not so few. And some countries have completely lost these technologies and opportunities when the economy fell comparable to the fall of the Russian economy.
        2. -3
          25 October 2021 13: 40
          Quote: slipped
          For the idiocy of rationalization proposals.

          I keep forgetting that for people like you it is necessary to make a postscript like "sarcasm" or "irony". Well, a question: why is a painted rocket worse than a painted spacesuit for people like you?
          1. +5
            25 October 2021 13: 43
            Quote: Vladimir_2U
            than for people like you a painted rocket is worse than a painted spacesuit?


            The coloring does not interfere with the flight of the rocket - it is pure aesthetics. The spacesuit will be in the way without going into details - it has such a surface color for a reason.
            1. -6
              25 October 2021 13: 48
              Quote: slipped
              The coloring does not interfere with the flight of the rocket - it is pure aesthetics.

              Truth will not help, and even at some, already insignificant distance, it will turn into an illegible strip.
              Quote: slipped
              The spacesuit will be in the way, it has such a surface color for a reason.
              Why would it hurt? The spacesuit is rosy. Fun rocket - fun spacesuit.
              1. +2
                25 October 2021 13: 56
                Quote: Vladimir_2U
                Truth will not help, and even at some, already insignificant distance, it will turn into an illegible strip.


                Everything is clearly visible there both when the rocket is delivered to launch and when it takes off.



                Quote: slipped
                The spacesuit is rosy.


                Here, oddly enough, you are right - the "Dreamer" spacesuit from young patients with oncology from twenty cities in ten countries:



                Children better understand a lot about multi-colored spacesuits.
                1. -2
                  25 October 2021 14: 23
                  Quote: slipped
                  Everything is clearly visible there both when the rocket is delivered to launch and when it takes off.

                  Well, what can you see in the photo, except for the colored stripes, well, don't lie to yourself.
                  1. +3
                    25 October 2021 22: 26
                    Quote: Vladimir_2U
                    Well, what can you see in the photo, except for the colored stripes, well, don't lie to yourself.


                    Open this photo in normal resolution on the web and take a look. It's not difficult. laughing Better yet, go to Baikonur and see it live.
                    1. -1
                      26 October 2021 04: 34
                      Quote: slipped
                      Open this photo in normal resolution on the web and take a look. It's not difficult.

                      There is no need for profanity, the elements of the trusses are quite distinguishable, but the patterns are not painted, and for some reason the flags in the photo below are quite distinguishable even without permission.
                      1. 0
                        26 October 2021 12: 03
                        Quote: Vladimir_2U
                        There is no need for profanity, the elements of the trusses are quite distinguishable, but the painted patterns are not,


                        These are not "painted patterns", this is a patchwork quilt with different patterns. Everything is clear with you - I see here, I don't see here. If you don’t want to see, say so. laughing
                      2. 0
                        26 October 2021 12: 22
                        Quote: slipped
                        If you don’t want to see, say so.

                        Are the truss elements distinguishable? Yes! What is drawn on the "blanket" is distinguishable? No.
                      3. +1
                        26 October 2021 12: 24
                        Quote: Vladimir_2U
                        Are the truss elements distinguishable? Yes! What is drawn on the "blanket" is distinguishable? No.


                        I wrote to you - this photo has a low resolution here - this is how the engine of this forum is made - to reduce the resolution to 800 lines. Open the original in high resolution, it is on the network and you can see it.

                        here you distinguish laughing

                        https://www.kosmonavtika.com/vaisseaux/mks/missions/mkseo37/photos/mks37-1219.jpg

                        https://www.kosmonavtika.com/vaisseaux/mks/missions/mkseo37/photos/mks37-1361.jpg
                      4. 0
                        26 October 2021 16: 46
                        Quote: slipped
                        I wrote to you - this photo has a low resolution here - this is how the engine of this forum is made - to reduce the resolution to 800 lines. Open the original in high resolution, it is on the network and you can see it.
                        Thank you, I'm aware of the resolution. Now reveal the secret, do you always use your eyes instead of seeing with a camera with a telephoto lens, as when taking these photos, or do you still use your eyes?


                        [/ Center]
                        Please, with normal removal and without enlargement, the picture is not readable! The truss elements are distinguishable, but the drawing is not.
                      5. +1
                        27 October 2021 04: 51
                        Quote: Vladimir_2U
                        Thank you, I'm aware of the resolution.


                        Wow laughing

                        Quote: Vladimir_2U
                        Now reveal the secret, do you always use your eyes instead of seeing with a camera with a telephoto lens, as when taking these photos, or do you still use your eyes?


                        In my life I watch photos and videos in UHD resolution on my TV screen. Including rocket launches, where the rocket itself is present through a telephoto lens up close and in detail.



                        Quote: Vladimir_2U
                        Please, with normal removal and without enlargement, the picture is not readable! The truss elements are distinguishable, but the drawing is not.


                        Maybe you are watching these photos through the keyhole and there is no money to buy a normal monitor-TV?

                        Well then, these are just YOUR problems. laughing
                      6. -1
                        27 October 2021 05: 00
                        Quote: slipped
                        In my life I watch photos and videos in UHD resolution on my TV screen. Including missile launches.

                        And what is so rogue? I thought that you were watching strictly live.
                        Quote: slipped
                        Better yet, go to Baikonur and see it live.
                      7. +1
                        27 October 2021 05: 06
                        Quote: Vladimir_2U
                        And what is so rogue? I thought that you were watching strictly live.


                        Ha, I'm more comfortable at home, because there is something to look at and it does not bother me at all. laughing Open the video above - it's in 4K and watch.

                        I drove and watched laughing It was not difficult. I like it.
                      8. 0
                        27 October 2021 05: 07
                        Quote: slipped
                        I drove and saw laughing It was not difficult. I like it.
                        Well done, I'm proud of you. Now answer, why are the elements of the trusses visible in the photo, but the drawing is not?
                      9. +1
                        27 October 2021 05: 08
                        Quote: Vladimir_2U
                        Well done, I'm proud of you. Now answer, why are the elements of the trusses visible in the photo, but the drawing is not?


                        So you are the blind, not me. laughing I can see everything. Do you continue to blunt? Oh well.
                      10. 0
                        27 October 2021 05: 09
                        Quote: slipped
                        So it's you who are blind, not me. laughing I can see everything.

                        What are the linear dimensions of the picture and the distance of your nose from the screen?
                      11. +1
                        27 October 2021 05: 10
                        Quote: Vladimir_2U
                        What are the linear dimensions of the picture and the distance of your nose from the screen?


                        "Are you Uncle Fedya?" - not mine lol
                      12. -1
                        27 October 2021 05: 12
                        Quote: slipped
                        "Are you Uncle Fedya?" - not mine

                        Well, of course, you cover up near-zero concepts in optics. And there is no answer.
                        Quote: Vladimir_2U
                        What are the linear dimensions of the picture and the distance of your nose from the screen?
                      13. +1
                        29 October 2021 23: 35
                        Quote: Vladimir_2U
                        Well, of course, you cover up near-zero concepts in optics. And there is no answer.


                        Well, you can admire the video of a rocket launch with a Khokhloma in 4K if there is such an opportunity. lol What to look at.

                      14. 0
                        31 October 2021 08: 04
                        Quote: slipped
                        with Khokhloma in 4K if there is such an opportunity lol What to look at.

                        What's not in a microscope? You still don’t understand that 4K is just an improved resolution, and without a telephoto lens, you will not see anything at least 1,5 pixels at least 100500 megapixels. And this Khokhloma cannot be read at normal distance, even with personal observation. Normal liveries are drawn WRONG, not unhooked, no matter how much it costs, liveries are drawn to be read with the ordinary naked eye from a maximum distance.
                        Once again, your 4K is a prop like a microscope.
                      15. +1
                        31 October 2021 12: 53
                        I see that the Khokhloma trolling was successful. lol It exploded well.
                      16. -1
                        1 November 2021 03: 19
                        Quote: slipped
                        I see that the Khokhloma trolling was successful. lol It blew well

                        I see that this has not improved your mind. But I still don't see the answer to a simple question.


                        Quote: Vladimir_2U
                        What are the linear dimensions of the picture and the distance of your nose from the screen?
                      17. +1
                        1 November 2021 14: 49
                        Quote: Vladimir_2U
                        But I still don't see the answer to a simple question.


                        Optics probably does not allow. laughing
                      18. 0
                        1 November 2021 15: 29
                        Quote: slipped
                        But I still don't see the answer to a simple question.
                        Optics probably does not allow.
                        What a pity, you were so proud of her.
      3. 0
        25 October 2021 19: 48
        Well written
    3. 0
      25 October 2021 13: 59
      "This is not Khokhloma, but Gorodets painting"

      What's the difference?
      1. 0
        25 October 2021 20: 11
        Only in PR from the manager Rogozin. He is very far from science and production
      2. -1
        26 October 2021 02: 16
        In Khokhloma, it seems, there is a red color. And here I did not notice him.
    4. -5
      25 October 2021 17: 01
      According to Dmitry Rogozin, who heads the above-mentioned department, Soyuz-2.1a is decorated with just such a painting at the request of the head of the Nizhny Novgorod region, Gleb Nikitin.

      Rogozin writes that such a request from the Nizhny Novgorod governor was received in honor of the 800th anniversary of the city.

      Money has nowhere to put what one, what another ?! In the NG region, all problems have been resolved, for example, all roads have been updated and illuminated, only the missiles have to be painted ?!
      Quote: Vladimir_2U
      Color spacesuits, spacesuits for matryoshka !!! Ugh.
      1. -5
        25 October 2021 18: 19
        What would be there to repair all the roads and make all the accompanying infrastructure, including lighting, and 100 billion rubles will not be enough - and this painting on a rocket of a million for 3 rubles pulls the maximum.
        1. 0
          26 October 2021 09: 11
          No "artists" will pass by! Probably they want to grab the next in a row for coloring, but they were afraid that our previous comments might interfere with them.
    5. 0
      25 October 2021 19: 08
      Sprinkle, sprinkle, this Easter egg, with holy water, immediately, so that it does not break on the firmament!
  2. +9
    25 October 2021 09: 58
    logically, the next rocket should be decorated with Polkhovmaidan painting! Polkhovsky Maidan (not to be confused with THEM!), Voznesensky district of the Nizhny Novgorod region. It will be very beautiful! Favorite tururushki since childhood!
    1. +3
      25 October 2021 10: 31
      Roskosmos continues to "exercise in the original design" of spacecraft and launch vehicles.

      Very "innovative" ideas from Roscosmos, thanks to Rogozin, supported.
      1. +4
        25 October 2021 11: 47
        Quote: frruc
        Roskosmos continues to "exercise in the original design" of spacecraft and launch vehicles.

        Very "innovative" ideas from Roscosmos, thanks to Rogozin, supported.

        Trump got one of his arguments knocked out. He called American rockets smart and beautiful.
        Now only he can call smart smile if he becomes the president of the United States for the second time.
  3. +10
    25 October 2021 09: 58
    Let the estimated cost of applying this "Khokhloma" be announced. It is likely that it makes a significant contribution to the launch price.
    1. +15
      25 October 2021 10: 38
      Will the Cossack chorus sing before the start? Will the priest with the censer bless? If not, then I'm already worried.
      1. 0
        25 October 2021 13: 21
        Quote: Kuzya the Cat
        Will the priest with the censer bless?

        The father must be sure! For an unsanctified rocket can crash against the firmament of heaven. smile
  4. +17
    25 October 2021 09: 58
    It does not affect flight performance ... Although they will paint it under Dali ... I don't even understand why everyone was so excited? For me, such beautiful patterns ...
    1. +10
      25 October 2021 10: 00
      Nah, +500 reliability. lol

      PS that's how much this painting ruined funds? Nowhere to spend something with real benefit?
      1. +11
        25 October 2021 10: 08
        This mural is more like a sticker like on cars.
        1. +4
          25 October 2021 11: 51
          Quote: BARKAS
          This mural is more like a sticker like on cars.

          On the way it is.
          According to the estimate, probably hand-painted, gold in silver, but in fact - they ordered self-adhesive prints through Alibaba. It will still burn and ends in water.
          The competent authorities need to take a closer look ... until it has flown away.
          wink
    2. -9
      25 October 2021 10: 03
      It turns out that we do not live badly if we paint the rockets! Let the Sarmat be painted with Kukryniksy during tests!
    3. +4
      25 October 2021 10: 06
      Ours, primordial, is closer to the body, all the same.
      Although, paint with "black squares" under Malevich is not worth it ... not a taxi, after all.
      1. +9
        25 October 2021 11: 44
        Ours, primordial, is closer to the body, all the same.
        Although, paint with "black squares" under Malevich is not worth it ... not a taxi, after all.

        They also paint under Malevich.
        1. +2
          25 October 2021 12: 10
          The weapon of the apocalypse ... just to paint them in pastoral motives, it would be some kind of mockery, special cynicism ... black humor.
          Everything has its purpose.
        2. 0
          25 October 2021 14: 21
          This is not Malevich!
          This is Alphonse Allais ...
    4. -18
      25 October 2021 10: 21
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      I don’t even understand why everyone was so excited? For me, such beautiful patterns ...

      Because Rogozin!
      Local gentlemen consider it a downright sacred duty, a duty at every opportunity to be sophisticated in barbs against Rogozin. Otherwise, the priests in the raion will not understand.
      1. +8
        25 October 2021 10: 31
        Posons are those who painted the space grind.
        1. -13
          25 October 2021 10: 32
          It turns out that you think of yourself as a poson, since you were offended and slapped a minus. I didn't know, I didn't know ...
          1. +7
            25 October 2021 10: 36
            Well, I'm for space, not show-off. Dear show-off.
            1. -11
              25 October 2021 10: 50
              Quote: Gardamir
              Well, I'm for space, not show-off. Dear show-off.

              Come on. You are opposed only because it was done by the modern Russian government, which you mortally hate.
              This is the only reason. And space has nothing to do with it.
              1. +3
                25 October 2021 11: 10
                Quote: Sydor Amenpospestovich
                Quote: Gardamir
                Well, I'm for space, not show-off. Dear show-off.

                Come on. You are opposed only because it was done by the modern Russian government, which you mortally hate.
                This is the only reason. And space has nothing to do with it.

                The modern Russian government deserves nothing but contempt.
                1. -8
                  25 October 2021 11: 40
                  Quote: lis-ik
                  The modern Russian government deserves nothing but contempt.

                  Then always say so, and do not come up with pretended noble nonsense, like: "Everything is wrong and everything is wrong. Space worries me, grandmothers worry" and the like.
              2. +7
                25 October 2021 11: 31
                Under the current Russian government, Sidor Amenpodestovich, the word "successes" in relation to space issues should be taken only in quotation marks.
                The number of launches under this modern government has been steadily decreasing from year to year; this has already become an irreversible trend. I am already silent about the complete technological and scientific stagnation in the industry.
                Of course, there are no stats for 2021. But let's take the statues for 2020 and compare them with 2000.
                So, 2000 - 35 launches. Russia is the leader.
                2020 - 17 launches. Anti-record. There has never been such a meager number of starts in the history of our country. Such a catastrophic failure can only be compared with the state of Soviet cosmonautics at the stage of its inception, when from 1957 to 1961 only 2 to 9 launches were made annually.
                What else should the modern Russian government do in space for Sidor Amenpodestovich to applaud her a second time?
                1. -12
                  25 October 2021 11: 38
                  Quote: Cosm22
                  What else should the modern Russian government do in space for Sidor Amenpodestovich to applaud her a second time?

                  Applauded for the second time?
                  Kindly point out where I applauded the modern Russian government for the first time.
                  1. +3
                    25 October 2021 11: 54
                    Ah ... So you blame her?
                    Those. in context agree with my comment?
                    Sorry, I didn't get it right away.
                    1. -11
                      25 October 2021 11: 57
                      So you can't point out where I applauded the modern Russian government for the second time? Why then did they write that?
                      1. +3
                        25 October 2021 12: 07
                        Should I have written that Sidor Amenpodestovich "mortally hates her"?
                        Sorry, but I have no reason for that.
                        It's just that, unlike you, I am well familiar with the semantic meaning of the terms "context", "association", "logic", "interpretation". Which allow, based on the entire phrase, to draw a conclusion about its essence.
                      2. -4
                        25 October 2021 12: 12
                        Quote: Cosm22
                        It's just that, unlike you, I am well familiar with the semantic meaning of the terms "context", "association", "logic", "interpretation". Which allow, based on the entire phrase, to draw a conclusion about its essence.

                        Rather, speculation and demagoguery.
                        You concluded that I applaud the authorities only on the grounds that I do not water it with guano, as you do.
                        Where is the context, association and logic here?
                2. -2
                  25 October 2021 16: 52
                  I'm even afraid to look at the pages where data is published on the number of patents for inventions and applications for discoveries, so as not to be upset with those who are leading there and where in Russia ... crying
                  1. -4
                    25 October 2021 18: 30
                    All these patents and their number - without practical implementation, there are only a few pieces of paper of breakthrough developments. Therefore, to look at their number, there is no point in looking at how many of them went into business.
                3. -5
                  25 October 2021 18: 27
                  "The number of launches under this modern government is steadily decreasing from year to year, this has already become an irreversible trend. I am already silent about the complete technological and scientific stagnation in the industry. True, it is decreasing from year to year - this year there will be more launches than last year.
                  "I am already silent about the complete technological and scientific stagnation in the industry." - What a technological stagnation - equipment is being updated, additive technologies are being introduced, new missiles are being introduced, by engines, by spacesuits, by control systems, by scientific equipment, by manned spacecraft, and everything else is being developed as they are financed. So turn the ravings with the howl.
                  1. -1
                    25 October 2021 22: 43
                    Quote: Vadim237
                    So roll up the ravings with the howl.


                    It’s useless, he’s focused on it. laughing
              3. +1
                26 October 2021 04: 11
                What are you not distant, by God. Or are you sitting on a salary?
      2. +13
        25 October 2021 10: 37
        Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich
        Because Rogozin!

        Speaking of birds ...

        lol
        1. -9
          25 October 2021 10: 42
          Quote: Canecat
          Speaking of birds ...

          That is, can you give your word of honor that this is a real sign, and not a fake?
          1. 0
            25 October 2021 10: 54
            Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich
            That is, you can give my word of honor

            For what I bought, I sold for that ... laughing
            1. -6
              25 October 2021 10: 57
              Quote: Canecat
              For what I bought, I sold for that.

              Well, yes. Why check information and sources when you need to quickly sketch, right? Well this is not the Union of fake-motis. And in the case of Rogozin, decency is useless, because in relation to the enemy everything is permissible?
              1. -1
                25 October 2021 11: 27
                Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich
                after all, in relation to the enemy, everything is permitted?

                Keep it simple ... looking for enemies. Maybe then you will start to distinguish a joke from the truth ... maybe. ))
                1. -6
                  25 October 2021 11: 36
                  Quote: Canecat
                  Maybe then you will start to distinguish a joke from the truth ... maybe. ))

                  Why didn't you immediately say about this, but held on to the last? Is it because at first they themselves took everything at face value and only then, finding themselves backed against the wall, they decided to write it off as a joke, in an attempt to save face?
                  1. +3
                    25 October 2021 11: 46
                    Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich
                    and held on to the last?

                    Did you see the smiley under the picture right away or a little later? )))
                    1. -9
                      25 October 2021 12: 14
                      Quote: Canecat
                      Did you see the smiley under the picture right away or a little later?

                      It is more rational to use a plate (srcm) to avoid misunderstandings. Smilies are too ambiguous.
        2. -12
          25 October 2021 10: 45
          Who is your lie designed for! On the fire of heads. Dmitry Yuryevich Ragozin has a tablet on his office Ragozin D.Yu and that's all.
          1. +3
            25 October 2021 11: 15
            Quote: tralflot1832
            Dmitry Yuryevich Ragozin has a tablet Ragozin D.Yu in his office and that's it.

            Read carefully ... the plate. laughing
            1. -1
              25 October 2021 18: 32
              Greetings to the Fake Makers.
        3. 0
          25 October 2021 10: 51
          The bogatyrs on the Russian land did not disappear. And let the pugs pick up the drool.
        4. +1
          25 October 2021 12: 33
          Quote: Canecat
          Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich
          Because Rogozin!
          Speaking of birds ...


          The birds are 100% fake and photo-toad.
    5. nnm
      -1
      25 October 2021 10: 41
      As Gagarin then managed to run without painting a spacesuit ...
      1. +5
        25 October 2021 13: 27
        Quote: nnm
        As Gagarin then managed to run without painting a spacesuit ...

        He-he-he ... according to Gallai's recollections, Gagarin's spacesuit was just painted by hand, right on the cosmonaut - five minutes before leaving for the launch pad, the inscription USSR was applied to the helmet with a brush, so that the first Soviet cosmonaut would not be mistaken for another Powers on the ground. smile
        1. +1
          25 October 2021 21: 39
          Quote: Alexey RA
          Gagarin's spacesuit was just painted by hand, right on the cosmonaut - five minutes before leaving for the launch pad, the inscription USSR was applied to the helmet with a brush

          And even nail polish, sort of. There the brush in the cap was built in.
          1. +1
            26 October 2021 01: 07
            If so, then this is the first nail polish that has been in space)
    6. +3
      25 October 2021 10: 45
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      It does not affect flight performance ... Although they will paint it under Dali ... I don't even understand why everyone was so excited? For me, such beautiful patterns ...

      The same opinion. The appearance of the rocket does not spoil, but on the contrary adds a purely Russian one. Under Khokhloma, the same would be normal.
    7. +1
      25 October 2021 11: 26
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      For me, such beautiful patterns ...

      the question is in the price, maybe it's better to spend on something sensible?
    8. -8
      25 October 2021 11: 32
      local "gifted" everything that does only trampolines in Roscosmos reminds them just to throw out their bile
  5. +10
    25 October 2021 10: 01
    So what, I don't see anything reprehensible.
    Let there be such a "trick"
  6. +6
    25 October 2021 10: 03
    What's the difference how it was painted and how much it cost. I think not more expensive than ordinary painting. The main thing is that the launches are successful.
    1. nnm
      -5
      25 October 2021 10: 43
      Yes, painting has a very strong effect on the success of launches (no)!
      1. 0
        25 October 2021 11: 30
        “I don’t understand why you, colleague, were given so many disadvantages. You can see the content is more important than the form.” don’t you?
        1. 0
          26 October 2021 18: 08
          Rogozin and his companions minus and in my opinion this is not a joke!
      2. -1
        25 October 2021 12: 39
        Quote: nnm
        Yes, painting has a very strong effect on the success of launches (no)!


        68 launches in a row and all successful. I do not know how "painting", but Rogozin definitely influences. laughing
        1. nnm
          0
          25 October 2021 13: 34
          68 starts ???? !!! This is for what period you announced the calculation? And ALL during this time successful? Excuse me, colleague, are you serious now?
          1. +1
            25 October 2021 13: 38
            Quote: nnm
            68 starts ???? !!! This is for what period you announced the calculation? And ALL during this time successful? Excuse me, colleague, are you serious now?


            What surprises you so much? Yes, it is ALL successful launches. Since October 2018. Does it bother you? laughing
            1. nnm
              +5
              25 October 2021 14: 01
              Colleague, here I opened the Roscosmos data for the 2018 you mentioned ... 11.10.18/XNUMX/XNUMX - an emergency launch and now I think, are you lying?
              1. 0
                25 October 2021 14: 03
                Quote: nnm
                Colleague, here I opened the Roscosmos data for the 2018 you mentioned ... 11.10.18/XNUMX/XNUMX - an emergency launch and now I think, are you lying?


                This was our last emergency launch, after that 68 successive ones in a row, right?
                1. nnm
                  +1
                  25 October 2021 14: 08
                  Well, that is, you are simply lying. OK.
                  Wouldn't it make it difficult for you to simultaneously voice the number of launches by China and the United States over the same period of time? And if not against objectivity, then by years, so that the dynamics could be assessed.
                  1. 0
                    25 October 2021 22: 24
                    Quote: nnm
                    Well, that is, you are simply lying.


                    Apparently, you are completely inadequate if you do not want to admit banal statistics. laughing So we will treat you. How inadequate.

                    And we will have a successful launch in three days. laughing
        2. 0
          25 October 2021 16: 54
          Quote: slipped
          68 launches in a row and all successful.

          There it is, Kosmos-2551 is a little bit everything.
          1. +1
            25 October 2021 22: 46
            Quote: military_cat
            There it is, Kosmos-2551 is a little bit everything.


            Little is how much? laughing "Has it all fallen apart?" laughing
    2. +5
      25 October 2021 11: 27
      Quote: SKVichyakow
      I think not more expensive than ordinary painting.

      in vain you think so, judging by all the production did not work a day
  7. +8
    25 October 2021 10: 03
    I see no obstacles .... any national motives are pleasing to the eye.
    This does not interfere with practical functionality, so let's go with the song!
    1. -4
      25 October 2021 10: 44
      Well, try to put on a shirt with a kolovrat. The policemen will quickly run up on the street.
  8. +4
    25 October 2021 10: 04
    Khokhloma / Gorodets, priests with censers at the launch site, film stars in orbit and so on and on and on ...
    Maybe it's enough to "move the beds" in Roscosmos and take more effective measures?
    1. +3
      25 October 2021 10: 13
      They forgot to involve samovar women in this action, without them the color is not complete.
  9. -4
    25 October 2021 10: 08
    Well, some kind of PPC.
    There is nothing to do chtol ?!
    1. +6
      25 October 2021 10: 42
      Why, - "nothing"? "He" also sings. Yes
  10. +7
    25 October 2021 10: 22
    Yes, even a purple speckled only would fly
    1. +1
      25 October 2021 10: 39
      I would say - do not care, even if not painted, the main thing is that it performs all the tasks assigned to it for all 100.
      1. +3
        25 October 2021 10: 43
        Yes, it is better unpainted, more cargo can be thrown or saved on fuel.
        1. +4
          25 October 2021 10: 49
          So what am I talking about? The main thing is reliability and functionality. Everything else is from the evil one.
  11. +1
    25 October 2021 10: 30
    Meanwhile, in Roscosmos itself, commenting on the appearance of the launch vehicle, they note that this is "not Khokhloma, but Gorodets painting."
    And you say there is little use from Rogozin, what is the use of him, now they distinguish types of painting there. Hopefully not to the detriment of basic qualifications.
    1. -2
      25 October 2021 18: 38
      In general, a good advertisement for Russian art. It remains to organize advertising banners in space and Roskosmos will bathe in money from investors, by the way, here Spaceix with tourists stalled on Dragon 2 for an indefinite time.
      1. 0
        25 October 2021 18: 44
        Quote: Vadim237
        In general, a good advertisement for Russian art.

        This is dust in the eyes of its own population, nothing more. And expensive dust.
        1. -2
          26 October 2021 17: 29
          For you, dust, and for those who will place their logos on rockets, real money from attracting clients and potential investors with such advertising - and such a pleasure costs a maximum of 3 million rubles.
  12. +7
    25 October 2021 10: 37
    I like it, we congratulated the citizens of Nizhny Novgorod on the anniversary of the city! Plus, many will find out that not only Khokhloma and Gzhel exist in Russia, but also Gorodets.smile
    1. +3
      25 October 2021 11: 06
      We also have the Polkhov Maidan! Relatives did these tururushki! The houses are still standing! So the native Nizhny Novgorod region is rich in talents! Like all other regions of Russia.
    2. -3
      25 October 2021 11: 07
      The rocket is really a Khokhloma, not a Gorodets. Rogozin doesn’t seem to be doing well in the fields.
  13. -1
    25 October 2021 11: 22
    do not whine .. beautiful! why the West promotes its values ​​.. but we can’t! do not draw gays)) better your own)
    1. -1
      25 October 2021 11: 31
      the main thing is to sanctify the pop.
    2. nnm
      +3
      25 October 2021 11: 37
      That's right ... it's not better to paint an entrance in some district town. And so yes, the values ​​are increased by 20 points and now it is certain that no gay is dangerous to us! Everyone knows that they are afraid of garlic vampires of painting on missiles.
  14. +5
    25 October 2021 12: 03
    Meanwhile, in Roscosmos itself, commenting on the appearance of the launch vehicle, they note that this is "not Khokhloma, but Gorodets painting." According to Dmitry Rogozin, who heads the above-mentioned department, Soyuz-2.1a is decorated with just such a painting at the request of the head of the Nizhny Novgorod region, Gleb Nikitin.

    Hoopoes !!! Gorodets painting is this:

  15. +3
    25 October 2021 12: 13
    You don't understand anything about astronautics.
    The left curl at the top of the painting is responsible for "yaw", the right one for "pitch" laughing wassat
  16. +1
    25 October 2021 12: 18
    PR rules! It's a family one. As a son of Rogozin, when he came to "Ilyushin" he dispersed the designers and recruited PR specialists. As a result, there is no plane. And of course the priest with the censer is not enough. Then everything will be spiritual and restrained.
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. 0
    25 October 2021 13: 11
    Quote: nnm
    1. That is, the "idiocy of rationalization proposals" is not in the painting of the rocket, but in the fact that a colleague expressed reasonable doubts about the advisability of these actions? I understand ...


    Just beautiful. Envy does not allow to enjoy aesthetics, apparently. lol

    Quote: nnm
    2. What relation does the shape (coloring) have to the content (useful output load, fuel weight, etc.)? Would the indicators have worsened without this? Piiiiiimaaayu ....


    Just beautiful. And they did something nice for the Nizhny Novgorod region.

    Quote: nnm
    3. Even how they do it. And in your parallel universe, no? Even in Moscow itself, the streets along which corteges of celestials fly, are served and improved much better than the rest.


    "Corteges of heaven" and fly around the courtyards of houses? laughing Oh well. Do not project your own onto someone else's.

    Quote: nnm
    4. Perhaps, on average, taking into account the Soviet period, you also have 25 launches, but if my memory serves me, then last year there were only 17.


    Not possible, but taking into account the Russian launches of the last decade. Last year, our main partners did not supply us with their spacecraft for various reasons. This year there are already 17 launches, and there will be more than twenty.

    Quote: nnm
    Enough? Both the messenger and the liana have been deployed to a full grouping, right? Ponyeeeeeeeee ...


    Messenger - completely and for a long time. All new satellites of this system, which were released this year, are being stored until next year:



    The Ministry of Defense is in charge of military systems. Who are you. to tell them?

    Quote: nnm
    5. Yeah ... from first place to third. It reminded me of an anecdote - the American athlete came in the penultimate of the two participants, and ours the second.


    We are not competing with anyone in launches - we have our own space program, which is being carried out.

    Quote: nnm
    6. and maybe make a film, and paint it ... but create your own orbital station as in the USSR, or a new heavy rocket? No?! Is it not enough paint, or just didn't choose Khokhloma or Gzhel?


    We have an orbital station - the ISS RS is called. Today there are two cosmonauts working there. And a new heavy rocket, which is undergoing flight tests today.



    Open your eyes. And don't be jealous.
  19. +8
    25 October 2021 14: 29
    Why is everyone so excited, who is this Khokhloma interfering with?
    The main thing is that this does not affect safety.
  20. -4
    25 October 2021 15: 26
    All the disappeared men, as always, have a fart on fire ...
    1. -4
      25 October 2021 18: 45
      They do not just burn there, but a thermonuclear reaction occurs and the diarrhea boils into the head.
      1. +1
        26 October 2021 12: 41
        Quote: Vadim237
        They do not just burn there, but a thermonuclear reaction occurs and the diarrhea boils into the head.


        Especially when Rogozin trolls them laughing
    2. 0
      26 October 2021 14: 22
      Feruzbek, did you personally check the farts of all?
      1. The comment was deleted.
  21. +2
    26 October 2021 00: 13
    export process video

  22. -2
    26 October 2021 04: 03
    The governor gave money from his own pocket for painting - I swear by the neighbor's pig!
    1. +1
      26 October 2021 12: 40
      Quote: tech3030
      The governor gave money from his own pocket for painting - I swear by the neighbor's pig!


      The sticker is inexpensive to print
      1. -3
        26 October 2021 12: 56
        Even if it's a sticker, is it safe? I don’t think you can slap anything there like on your car. Spending budget money is a crime.
        1. +1
          26 October 2021 13: 02
          Quote: tech3030
          Even if it's a sticker, is it safe? I don’t think you can slap anything there like on your car. Spending budget money is a crime.


          It is, let's say, safe and this has been tested by many launches earlier, since such stickers have been glued for many years and only this one was suddenly noticed by the hamsters, because the author was burning with trolling. laughing There is no "waste of budget money" - a sticker for Roscosmos is worth nothing at all, but advertising using such stickers brings good extra-budgetary income.
          1. -2
            26 October 2021 13: 03
            How can she be worthless, you go..from the governor's or avocado?
            1. +1
              26 October 2021 13: 05
              Quote: tech3030
              How can she be worthless, you go..from the governor's or avocado?


              You yourself are both laughing Read above what is written.
          2. 0
            26 October 2021 18: 03
            Nothing is nothing and any work costs money. People like you justify the waste of money or cut it. Advertising what is there - khokhloma?
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. +1
    26 October 2021 13: 44
    Yes, even the Petrikovskaya embroidered shirt! )))
  25. 0
    28 October 2021 05: 01
    This is all that Rogozin has enough of his brains!