Russia is not going to cut defense spending - Rogozin

The intention of the Russian government does not include a reduction in defense spending planned according to the state armaments program to 2020 (GVV-2020), Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin said today, RIA News.

“We don’t write the script here, but on the whole I want to say that we will not have any reductions in defense spending and plant renewal,” he said on the Vesti FM radio station.

The Vice Prime Minister recalled that before 2020, under the HPV-2020, it is planned to allocate 20 trillion rubles for upgrading weapons and military equipment for the Russian army, and another 3 trillion for upgrading defense enterprises.

Comments

[spender]

These statements are disgusting to hear. You cannot make promises whose fulfillment does not depend on you. At least they look funny
The economic collapse in the world is such that countries with stronger economic potential are reducing, and we have blah blah blah and everything is fine until 2020, ugh

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: spender

The economic collapse in the world is such that countries with stronger economic potential are reducing,

Alexei, well, while the oil price is kept at a high level, there will be no reductions, but if it collapses, we will again give the bankers 300mrd bucks instead of throwing them directly into the real sector and rearmament. A vicious circle.

[spender]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

Well, as long as the oil price is kept at a high level, there will be no reductions, but if it crashes. We will again give the bankers 300mrd bucks, instead of throwing them directly into the real sector and rearmament. A vicious circle.

There are too many factors ... With the same success, Rogozin may be responsible for the fact that the rivers in Europe will not leave the banks until 2020, or there will be no mudflow in the Caucasus ... It does not depend on you, do not climb, do not make empty slogans , do not PR, because you are a government official, not a clown

[mongoose]

if energy prices collapse, then this will interest us in the last place, because this will be a consequence of the collapse of the entire world dollar "economy" there are simply no other reasons for this

[mongoose]

those. Are you a spender against the rearmament of the Russian army in principle?
ps maybe you are a supporter of the fact that the soldiers would be re-equipped with mosquitoes? and what is cheap and cheerful?

[spender]

Quote: mongoose

Do you oppose the rearmament of the Russian army in principle?

I oppose the distortion of my words!

[Joker]

Alexey, Rogozin doesn’t get used to scratching his tongue

[spender]

Quote: Joker

Rogozin doesn’t get used to scratching his tongue

Oleg, scratching his tongue is his profession, but "unfounded promises" to give it is already detrimental to the people's trust and to a career

[Joker]

Alexey, he’s been promoted, after all, everyone probably already guessed that he would run for the next term. Therefore, in each barrel he’s a stopper, I promise to promise is called, like people reassured

[donchepano]

to the most pagan tongues, in principle, on the drum, the opinion and trust of the people ...
and a career issue is decided depending on loyalty to the body

[wvivon]

more and more promises, besides the money of which there is still no, they still have to earn

[Joker]

Well, the Americans do not stop being bankrupt and at the same time rearm the army for virtual money, you are aware that they once again want to raise the debt bar to 17 trillion. cu? This money would be enough to completely destroy Russia and rebuild it from scratch, only once in 10 is better and more, America was created on these debts, in fact they are just a soap bubble.

[wvivon]

here the matter is different, they will have money so no one will recognize them as bankrupt (then I would have to write off debts) and America’s collapse will lead to the collapse of the world economy in the first place, China and Europe, and Russia will not avoid this either (as if they would invent

[Joker]

There is no dispute, but America as a whole may not collapse, but oh, how hard it will be for citizens. The bureaucrats don’t care, they always have the money, they will find another place where you can warm your ass, it’s a trouble not only in the USA but also in Russia, the very idea of ​​democracy is good, but so far it has been distorted so that now it sounds like a curse.

[donchepano]

THE IDEA AND COMMUNISM ABOUT UNIVERSAL EQUALITY AND BROTHERSHIP IN GENERAL WAS ALSO BEAUTIFUL, BUT HOW EXPLAINED ....

[donchepano]

FRS - MANUFACTURER OF DOLLARS - (PRIVATE BANKS) - PRINT SO MUCH DOLLARS HOW MUCH IT NEEDS.
AND YOU WILL CONTINUE TO SUPPORT HOW TO SAY THIS MUCH LESS THAN TO OTHER FRIENDS OF THE RUSSIAN PEOPLE, BUYING THEIR Smelly GREEN EMPTY PAPERS AND MAKE ANY CALCULATIONS IN THEIR SAME

[crazyrom]

Quote: spender

These statements are disgusting to hear. You cannot make promises whose fulfillment does not depend on you.

And who said that this is "gag"? I think he was told from above to say this, those on whom the decision depends. If Putin himself says this, he already provokes the enemy to respond, diplomacy is subtle, but here it seems like an official says, it is not so important, but it has already been said, the addressee understood everything.

[Andrei.B]

the main thing is that the country does not switch to coupons!

[donchepano]

NOW WAIT WITHOUT ANY TALONS, THE PRICES WILL TAKE OFF ... AND WORLDWIDE WILL GO WITH BAGS OF DECREASED MONEY

[volcano]

Well, what are the statues about ???

This is already tired of repeating ....

What to listen to Rogozin, if the President said "I give a grudge" will not be reduced ...

Well, let's lay out every day who else said something.
The Minister of Defense said ... NGS said ..... Navy Commander said ....

Let's write ONE ARTICLE consisting of one sentence

EVERYBODY SAY THAT THEY WILL NOT DECREASE ..... Even the locksmith Uncle Vasya ......

WE WILL LOOK BY 20 YEARS HOW WE DID NOT REDUCE AND WHAT WE GOT

[mongoose]

um, with such a mood as a respected live? Is it time to go for the sheet? By the way, for the last 10 years, it seems that you have not been taught anything

[volcano]

Quote: mongoose

um, with such a mood as a respected live? Is it time to go for the sheet? By the way, for the last 10 years, it seems that you have not been taught anything

What are you talking about ???
Or so ... what would I write something ???

[donchepano]

UNDER 20 YOU CAN AND DO NOT LIVE ...

[Vanek]

We’ll look at the toga. And before them not long left. A little over 7 years old. Business something.

[Praetorian]

These seven years still have to live.

[Vanek]

Quote: Praetorian

These seven years still have to live.

Quote: Vanek

Delov something.

What is not clear?

[Praetorian]

Well, I mean, you never know, what can happen in seven years with Russia and, in general, in the world. =)

[NickitaDembelnulsa]

DyK, and who comes to the head to cut them, in our position and in our time?

[vorobey]

And the source itself amuses me. the splash screen on the site is so interesting, and what you need is a selection.

[nickname 1 and 2]

vorobey,

And how to connect with this ????

http://www.nakanune.ru/articles/16591

"We pay tribute to them and they control us completely." Russian business on the hook of the USA
font size: AAA to blog printable version


Yevgeny Fedorov, deputy of the State Duma of four convocations, former chairman of the Committee on Economic Policy and Entrepreneurship, member of the General Council of the United Russia party, spoke about the main problems of our economy and ways of solving it.
Question: Evgeny Alekseevich, you were removed from the post of chairman of the Committee on Economic Policy and Entrepreneurship, deprived of the right to speak in the media because of your position on the political and economic sovereignty of Russia. yours What is your point of view so unpopular?
Evgeny Fedorov: I am generally forbidden to discuss sovereignty. We have little discussion of real problems, because it is not customary for us to discuss the laws of politics, to seriously talk about life. Serious analysis is not allowed into the information space.
In 1991, one side was defeated against the other. The Soviet Union lost the war, because the enemy studied us well and applied the operation to promote his agent Gorbachev, who in six years managed to create a mechanism to eliminate the country.
We lost in the 40-year war, which for some reason is called "cold." And today, our state apparatus is partially subject to the winner, that is, America. We pay tribute to them, and they control us completely.

[King]

The notification is now and then in the media about the increase in the defense order. looks like a cat and mouse game. according to many, the United States did the same by imposing an arms race on the USSR, which economically failed and led to the collapse of the USSR.

[escobar]

In my opinion, Ragozin is not taking his place now. Yes, he is a loyal patriot and a clever palistik, well, he would be saddles at the UN or the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Here you need a person with a technical education, a manager and preferably a military man.

In short, it turned out to be a master of sports, Lt. Col. Chingachguk.

[Praetorian]

I just can’t say for sure, but, in my opinion, he once declared that Siberia should be given to China. He said so quite seriously. True enough years ago, but still. (I apologize if I made a mistake and it was not he who said that.)

[donchepano]

RAGOZIN- PATRIOT ???

[Joker]

Rogozin is a balabol and not a patriot. If he will run for president, I will not vote for him.

[Sasha 19871987]

something that reminds us of the 70-80s, what it looks like for the next arms race ... wait and see?)

[mongoose]

not, Russia right now is not threatening direct military parity from the United States, and is doing the right thing,
ps Already at the moment, the United States maintains its fleet, printing candy wrappers, when the situation with emissions changes (soon), their fleet will simply not be affordable for them

[strannik595]

I think when they understand that their fleet becomes too expensive for them, the situation in the world will cease to be languid

[donchepano]

Sorry, whose fleet and who is NOT POCKETED ???

[baltika-18]

“We are not writing the script, but there will be no reductions.” Question: who is writing the script for this play? It is now with a somewhat comic tinge. If only it does not become a tragedy.

[taseka]

It reminds a finger with a scarecrow addressed to NATO - they say look there with us, we are also not born! I think analysts and U.S. intelligence are aware of the real situation in the VS.RF. (Like us, however, about them)
By the way, how do we control the USA?

[mongoose]

Yeah, and even satellites with lasers fly and snoop around

[Joker]

Just waiting:

Armata, Kurgan, boomerang ...

http://topwar.ru/18323-novaya-versiya-oblika-armaty.html

[genad2]

Already finished!

[suharev-52]

I would have their confidence that we will live to 2050. What a bright future they draw for us by: 20th, 50th. And outside the window: the main hegemon is shaking the situation around the world. Boiling hotbeds of internecine strife, with the active participation of international bandits and terrorists, are rolling closer and closer to the borders of Russia. And at our top there are only great projects about our bright future, so in fifty years. How we will heal well. And looking around with sadness you see: a ruined village with boarded-up huts and fields overgrown with weeds, remnants of buildings, once successful enterprises; a tortured and demoralized army, constantly being reduced and reformed in the "Serdyukov way"; greedy oligarchs who are ready to rip off three skins from the Russian people and ship them offshore. And above all this, the idle bravado of chatter how good it will be there ahead. Sincerely.