Operation Intervention

149

Not so long ago it became known that the United States and Britain have allocated additional funds from their budgets for information countermeasures to Russia. Washington and London no longer even hide the fact that they are ready to inject billions of dollars and pounds into anti-Russian organizations and structures with one single goal - to sow chaos in Russia, to achieve an approximate repetition of what they once achieved in Ukraine, in Libya.

Western "friends" usually place the main centers of information countermeasures or the so-called bot farms closer to the borders of Russia. These are Poland, Lithuania, Estonia, Czech Republic. From there comes funding for all sorts of pseudo-human rights organizations, there are offices of media that are notable for openly anti-Russian activities. Europeans and Americans perceive information about Russia through the prism of the work of these centers. And if suddenly objective information about the Russian Federation, about Russian citizens reaches the western man in the street, then this leads the sponsors of anti-Russian sentiments into confusion. They are not used to information countermeasures, they cannot get used to it. It is believed that they can, and Russia cannot. What is allowed to Jupiter ...



Financial support for all these centers, societies, foundations sometimes comes directly from government organizations of Western countries, including the US Treasury, US State Department, British Foreign Office, etc. The real Operation Intervention is underway.

Nikita Mikhalkov reflects on this in his Besogon program. He decided to call the new episode of the program "Anatomy of Power", where he discusses how and by whom the anti-Russian forces are supported, including in Russia itself.

149 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    17 September 2021 09: 19
    Operation Intervention
    Nothing new in general. So the head is given to the person, so that it would be reasonable to CHOOSE, and not from the bulldozer.
    Obviously, our choice is not ice and we will have to choose, almost, the least evil of those present ... well, so YOURSELF allowed it all !!! Now you have to scoop up the stream ... it's not clear HOW, really.
    1. +6
      17 September 2021 09: 39
      Quote: rocket757
      Obviously, our choice is not ice and we will have to choose, almost, the least evil of those present ... well, so YOURSELF allowed it all !!!

      And who allowed all these "Echoes of Moscow" and the notorious "Rains" feeding on the money of the State Department and the Tavistock Institute. And there is no council here, so the other day Sobchak compared the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Afghanistan and the flight of the Americans. So, according to her, the Soviet army fled, and the American one left in an organized way.
      1. +15
        17 September 2021 09: 44
        Quote: tihonmarine
        And who allowed all these "Echoes of Moscow" and the notorious "Rains"

        So the speculator Mikhalkov has piled up so much nonsense about the past, including in his little movies.
        1. +7
          17 September 2021 10: 15
          They are all good. They feed and say what they want to hear from them. And ehi, little dogs, bulls are bullshit for the West. Although personally I would like these characters to saw the forest near Turukhansk.
          1. +5
            17 September 2021 10: 54
            Quote: 210ox
            sawed wood near Turukhansk.

            Under Turukhansk there is tundra, forest-tundra (dwarf trees), and swamps .. there are many swamps.
            There is no forest suitable for logging. request you can cut the current shackles .. with a file sent in a parcel from the mainland .. in a pack of Prima. crying
            1. +4
              17 September 2021 10: 57
              Well, there is a job for them in the tundra too .. Well, you get the idea .. hi
            2. +3
              17 September 2021 12: 00
              Quote: ammunition
              Under Turukhansk there is tundra, forest-tundra (dwarf trees), and swamps .. there are many swamps.

              Let them drain the swamps there.
              1. +2
                17 September 2021 12: 39
                Let them clean the tundra of snow, sweep it every winter.
                1. +2
                  17 September 2021 13: 20
                  Quote: Anatoliy
                  Let them clean the tundra of snow, sweep it every winter.

                  It is true that labor ennobles a man (but not a monkey).
        2. +8
          17 September 2021 10: 49
          Quote: Vladimir_2U
          including in their kinushki.

          I don't like his movies.
      2. 0
        17 September 2021 09: 58
        Quote: tihonmarine
        And who allowed all these "Echoes of Moscow" and the notorious "Dozhdi" to feed on the money of the State Department?

        Who allowed it? Khrushchev, Brezhnev, Gorbachev, Yeltsin.
        You can give candy, but taking away is still a problem.

        By the way, I've already voted. I asked the commission a question: "Is it my duty to vote secretly or is it my right? If it is my duty, then I should go to the voting booth, and if this is my right, then I can put a tick in the ballots wherever I want, without embarrassing anyone. ". There was no answer, they do not know ... And how are you? laughing
        1. +1
          17 September 2021 10: 15
          Quote: Boris55
          There was no answer, they do not know ... And how are you?

          So I don’t vote, I’m not supposed to.
          1. +1
            17 September 2021 10: 17
            Quote: tihonmarine
            So I don’t vote, I’m not supposed to.

            Do you live in a non-democratic country?
            1. +11
              17 September 2021 10: 44
              Quote: Boris55
              Do you live in a non-democratic country?

              "Democracy is a perverted form of the bourgeois state" I.V. Stalin, and I live in Tallinn.
              1. +1
                17 September 2021 10: 45
                Quote: tihonmarine
                I live in Tallinn.

                Not citizens means ...
                1. +5
                  17 September 2021 10: 47
                  Quote: Boris55
                  Not citizens means ...

                  A stateless person in Estonia.
                  1. +4
                    17 September 2021 21: 50
                    Quote: tihonmarine
                    A stateless person in Estonia.

                    And why do you need this Estonia then? Hectares of land are given, again the Ministry of Internal Affairs is lobbying for a new law on migrants.
                    1. +3
                      18 September 2021 10: 30
                      Quote: Overlock
                      And why do you need this Estonia then? Hectares of land are given, again the Ministry of Internal Affairs is lobbying for a new law on migrants.

                      So to master hectares you also need a ton of money. And the new law is only being lobbied, and it will come into force in 10 years, and then I will no longer need a hectare, but many times less.
                  2. -1
                    20 September 2021 12: 32
                    And patriotism, and the Motherland?
                    Are you broadcasting from there?
                    It's convenient, yes ...
                    1. 0
                      20 September 2021 12: 55
                      Quote: Revival
                      And patriotism, and the Motherland?
                      Are you broadcasting from there?
                      It's convenient, yes ...

                      Life scattered us at one time, throughout the Soviet Union, and perestroika and the subsequent collapse left us where they sent us.
                      So I broadcast from where I live, where my children and grandchildren were born. So sorry.
        2. +3
          17 September 2021 10: 44
          Quote: Boris55
          There was no answer, they don't know ...

          Nuuu ... This should be requested by the superior organization. Get clarification and better in writing. The answer must come to our commission within the time limit established by law. So come for the answer in the next elections. Then, in a whisper, "You understand, the party's policy is changing like a draft, so we cannot guarantee you an answer."
        3. +5
          17 September 2021 10: 45
          Quote: Boris55
          There was no answer, they do not know ... And how are you?

          We'll go vote on the 19th in red ... Yes
          1. +4
            17 September 2021 22: 44
            Quote: ROSS 42
            We'll go vote on the 19th in red ..

            I don’t like communists, but how can you beat a sharper?
            1. 0
              17 September 2021 22: 57
              Quote: Overlock
              Overlock (Sergey)

              Ndaaaa! Vidos is serious!
              Paleo wild !!!
        4. +1
          8 October 2021 17: 42
          Quote: Boris55
          Is it my duty to vote in secret, or is it my right?

          I guess this is your insurance ....
      3. +5
        17 September 2021 09: 58
        Quote: tihonmarine
        And who allowed all these "Echoes of Moscow" and the notorious

        And everything is good with us everywhere, understandable, right ??? Downstairs and upstairs?
        And here, and there goes ... carve-up, what, to whom and how much!
        I say, there is no one to choose from, nothing from ... separate, more or less decent individuals are buried by the mass of those who ... in general, there is nothing in the same field with them!
        Not now it happened, but the sequence of events, if we didn’t start it, we certainly didn’t want to bother / bother to interrupt it!
        1. +4
          17 September 2021 10: 15
          Quote: rocket757
          Well, I say, there is no one to choose from, nothing from ... separate, more or less decent personalities are buried by the mass of those who ...

          You need to vote for the Communist Party .. you can't go wrong in any case ..
          1. -12
            17 September 2021 10: 26
            Quote: Svarog
            You need to vote for the Communist Party .. you can't go wrong in any case ..

            For the Communist Party? Do you want Russia to fall apart?

            The CPRF, like the CPSU, has an ideology of obscurity. Where is the USSR?

            "Marxism is a doctrine of a provocative and imitative nature, proclaiming the inevitability of humanity's transition on a global scale from the" exploitation of man by man "into the" kingdom of freedom "- first to socialism, and then to communism.
            The ideals of justice in a socialist and communist society, expressed as they are expressed in Marxism, or expressed in some other way, are attractive to the majority of those who live by their labor and oppressed by the parasitism of the ruling minority, therefore, in certain historical circumstances, the crowd turns out to be responsive to the slogans in which it sees expressing their aspirations for a better life without parasitism and oppression of the majority by the minority.

            However, as history shows, not all slogans are realized by those who throw them into the crowd, and those who respond to the calls and sincerely work to translate the slogans into reality. And this does not always happen because the ideals proclaimed in the slogans are objectively unrealizable, and the leaders are two-faced and hypocritical. For the most part, this happens because for the implementation of the proclaimed ideals to the leaders and the crowd, behind-the-scenes political scriptwriters, in pursuit of their goals, provocatively offer means that are obviously unsuitable for this, the unsuitability of which they cannot reveal in advance.

            This also applies to Marxism.
            The imitative and provocative essence of Marxism is expressed in the fact that,
            - firstly, in the philosophy of Marxism, the question of solving the problem of predictability of a multivariate future, which lies at the basis of all power and all control, has been replaced by the “basic” question of the primacy of matter or consciousness,
            - secondly, the political economy of Marxism is metrologically untenable, and it cannot be linked in the course of real economic activity with accounting either at the micro or macro levels of the economy.
            By virtue of these two features of Marxism of a principled nature, the crowd that believes in Marxism turns out to be a hostage of the masters of Marxism, who have a certain "know-how" of exercising their ideological and economic power. "

            Does this ideology suit you? Me - no. What a foundation, so is a building.
            1. +5
              17 September 2021 10: 30
              For the Communist Party? Do you want Russia to fall apart?

              Russia is dying out at an unprecedented rate in history, two Tajiks are being brought in to replace the deceased Russian ... who are already organizing street fights (among themselves for now) and raping Russian children ...
              Yes, I do not need such a Russian Federation .. Better than Zh.Alferov, no one has said yet ... in relation to this power ..
              ".. If a citizen is forced to pay for education and medical care, to accumulate a pension from his own funds, to pay housing and utilities in full, at market prices, then why do I need such a state ?! Why should I still pay taxes and maintain an insane army of officials "I have always said at all levels that health care, education and science should be provided from the budget. If the state dumps this concern on ourselves, let it disappear, it will be much easier for us! .." (from Zhores Alferov's book "Power without brains. Who academicians interfere ").
              1. -8
                17 September 2021 10: 32
                Quote: Svarog
                Yes, I don't need such a RF

                That's what I'm talking about - you will destroy Russia as well as the USSR.
                1. +8
                  17 September 2021 10: 48
                  Quote: Boris55
                  Quote: Svarog
                  Yes, I don't need such a RF

                  That's what I'm talking about - you will destroy Russia as well as the USSR.

                  You, with your idols, today are quite successfully destroying Russia. Your idols have taken away from the people practically all the gains of Soviet power. By the way, the USSR destroyed your idols, do you forget to mention this?
                  1. 0
                    17 September 2021 10: 49
                    Quote: aleksejkabanets
                    do you forget to mention this?

                    My idol is Stalin.
                    1. +4
                      17 September 2021 10: 52
                      Quote: Boris55
                      My idol is Stalin.

                      Then tell yourself what Stalin would call the present state and its "leaders".
                      1. -6
                        17 September 2021 11: 01
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        as Stalin would have called the current state and its "leaders".

                        Do you mean how Stalin would call Putin? His companion, the successor of his work in new circumstances.

                        To understand this, you need to answer only two questions:
                        Which country did Stalin accept and which one did he leave?
                        What country did Putin accept and what is it like?
                      2. +4
                        17 September 2021 11: 05
                        Quote: Boris55
                        Do you mean how Stalin would call Putin? His companion, the successor of his work in new circumstances.

                        Borya, have you switched to heavy ones? belay
                        Quote: Boris55
                        Which country did Stalin accept and which one did he leave?
                        What country did Putin accept and what is it like?

                        Wow! You at least turn off the TV set sometimes, otherwise your gloomy consciousness will not bring you good.
                      3. +2
                        17 September 2021 11: 07
                        Quote: Stroporez
                        You at least turn off the TV set sometimes, otherwise your gloomy consciousness will not bring you good.

                        Photo documents testify (there are many of them on the internet):



                        Is it like today when people were last selling?
                      4. 0
                        17 September 2021 13: 51
                        Quote: Boris55
                        Is it like today when people were last selling?

                        I have not seen this in Russia for a long time, but I saw it in one country next to Russia.
                      5. -1
                        20 September 2021 14: 09
                        Photo documents testify (there are many of them on the internet):

                        Um .. and what do they testify to? That in 1991-1996 there was an acute phase of the transformational economic crisis in Russia?
                        Well, the most important question. And what, in fact, are the economic reforms of V.V. Putin then consisted? Well, you can describe what the reforms were in, say, Konrad Adenauer in Germany or Deng Xiaoping in China. What do we have?
                        By the way, the answer is known, first - recovery growth after the transformation of the economy from a command-planned to a market one, against the background of liberal reforms of the cabinet of ministers chaired by Mikhail Kasyanov, then - a galloping rise in oil and gas prices, while also, in general, rather a market-monetarist economic politics. And so the entire period 2000-2012, which saw the growth of the Russian economy. Which was not thanks to, but rather contrary to the "Wishlist" so-called. "power lobby".
                      6. +6
                        17 September 2021 11: 20
                        Quote: Boris55
                        Do you mean how Stalin would call Putin? His companion, the successor of his work in new circumstances.

                        Boris, is that your humor?
                        Quote: Boris55
                        What country did Putin accept and what is it like?

                        And what is she like? My father-in-law now has oncology, and my mother-in-law, as I found out, had a stroke, I can tell you a lot about medicine, she is now in Psebay, so I even brought her my iodine. Does it differ much from the 90s? In the 90s, honey. the service was much better, at least in the provinces.
                      7. +3
                        17 September 2021 11: 32
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Does it differ much from the 90s?

                        It differs .. for the worse .. Yesterday I didn’t find diphenhydramine in the pharmacy .. they don’t sell it now because it’s cheap too .. and expectorant for coughs from 300 rubles .. packing .. In other words, pensioners and people with low incomes of which we have 85% to be treated only on credit .. or die .. from a common cold ..
                      8. 0
                        17 September 2021 13: 53
                        Quote: Svarog
                        It differs .. for the worse .. Yesterday I didn’t find diphenhydramine in the pharmacy .. they don’t sell it now because it’s cheap too.

                        Well, not so bad, if diphenhydramine can be bought at a pharmacy, can you say that you can buy antibiotics without a prescription?
                      9. +1
                        17 September 2021 23: 26
                        Quote: tihonmarine
                        Quote: Svarog
                        It differs .. for the worse .. Yesterday I didn’t find diphenhydramine in the pharmacy .. they don’t sell it now because it’s cheap too.

                        Well, not so bad, if diphenhydramine can be bought at a pharmacy, can you say that you can buy antibiotics without a prescription?

                        Yes, I buy antibiotics without a prescription .. but diphenhydramine is nowhere to be found .. it is cheap and its pharmacies are apparently not profitable to sell ..
                      10. 0
                        18 September 2021 10: 26
                        Quote: Svarog
                        Yes, I buy antibiotics without a prescription .. but diphenhydramine is nowhere to be found .. it is cheap and its pharmacies are apparently not profitable to sell ..


                        It is true that everything is cheap, not profitable for the owner of the pharmacy. And we have no prescription, except for aspirin and paracetamol: you can't buy it, but there is no diphenhydramine at all,
                      11. 0
                        18 September 2021 17: 12
                        it is cheap and it seems that it is not profitable for pharmacies to sell it ..
                        Diphenhydramine on sale guarantees your pharmacy a queue of drugs.
                      12. +2
                        17 September 2021 21: 54
                        Quote: Boris55
                        Do you mean how Stalin would call Putin? His companion, the successor of his work in new circumstances.

                        Hard case, non-negotiable
                      13. 0
                        20 September 2021 12: 35
                        “Do you mean how Stalin would call Putin?

                        100500+
                        This is humor, this is ..
                        )))))))))))
                      14. +3
                        17 September 2021 21: 53
                        Quote: aleksejkabanets
                        Then tell yourself what Stalin would call the present state and its "leaders".

                        The question is better: what would he do with them?
                      15. +1
                        20 September 2021 12: 44
                        I would call them enemies of the people. And this is not a bombastic term. These are the realities of life.
                2. +2
                  17 September 2021 21: 52
                  Quote: Boris55
                  That's what I'm talking about - you will destroy Russia as well as the USSR.

                  You ALREADY did it
            2. +11
              17 September 2021 10: 55
              Quote: Boris55
              For the Communist Party? Do you want Russia to fall apart?

              On what basis do you think that Russia will fall apart when it returns to a socialist economic formation with a renewed ideology in the spirit of the times?
              Why don't you worry about the fate of the country, under the leadership of United Russia? A country in which the constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens are grossly violated? A country in which the people were prepared for the fate of an outcast and an extinct ethnic group? Countries where the police are only concerned with fighting dissent and protecting those in power, regardless of their innocence?
              It's somehow uncomfortable to live knowing that at any moment this whole "ideal" world can collapse at the whim of some oligarch ...
              1. -8
                17 September 2021 11: 03
                Quote: ROSS 42
                On what basis do you think that Russia will fall apart

                Based on the ideology of the party. The Communist Party of the Russian Federation did not abandon obscurity, which has already once brought the country to collapse. The second time to get up on the same rake - thank you.
                1. +7
                  17 September 2021 12: 37
                  Quote: Boris55
                  The Communist Party of the Russian Federation did not abandon obscurity, which has already once brought the country to collapse.

                  that's when the USSR abandoned Marxism and then the collapse happened. 1965 beginning - 1991 ending.
                  1. +2
                    17 September 2021 13: 54
                    Quote: aybolyt678
                    that's when the USSR abandoned Marxism and then the collapse happened. 1965 beginning - 1991 ending.

                    Didn't Khrushchev do it?
                    1. +3
                      17 September 2021 14: 49
                      Quote: tihonmarine
                      Didn't Khrushchev do it?

                      The main task of the congress was that the more complete satisfaction of the needs of Soviet people, instead of the development of the personality of every Soviet person ... satisfaction of needs is a capitalist category tending to infinity.
                      1. 0
                        20 September 2021 14: 12
                        satisfaction of needs is a capitalist category tending to infinity

                        In fact, according to Marx, economics (as a basis) exists precisely to meet the needs of people in goods and services.
                        But that is according to Marx and Engels, of course. According to the North Korean fascist theory of "Juche Songun", it exists for something completely different - to satisfy the super-luxurious needs of the "leader" and his entourage, coupled with the exorbitant appetites of the military department and the military-industrial complex.
                      2. 0
                        20 September 2021 18: 11
                        Quote: Terran Ghost
                        To Marx, economics (as a basis) just exists to meet the needs of people in goods and services.

                        you are a little confused. Economics is the science that studies the movement of money, the laws of production, distribution and exchange of goods and services. And goods and services serve to satisfy needs. smile Marx, you know, he does not admit free interpretation. Khrushchev could not understand the difference between Cost and Price - and what came of it? and the difference is fundamental, if you are a connoisseur of Marx, you will understand me.
              2. 0
                18 September 2021 20: 37
                Quote: ROSS 42
                On what basis do you think that Russia will fall apart when it returns to a socialist economic formation with a renewed ideology in the spirit of the times?

                You hung your ears and are happy. I'm just from people like you, naive, just laughing. Do you at least understand that one State Duma is not able to change in the country, not what. And when someone promises it, they are just populists and liars. I am most amused when they shout at the top of my lungs that the pension reform will be canceled and all extracted resources will be nationalized, it’s hilarious. You understand that one State Duma cannot nationalize itself and adopt laws unilaterally, they send them to the Federal Assembly for approval, see chapter 12 Procedure for consideration by the Federation Council of a federal law adopted by the State Duma (Articles 103-110)
                Half of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation support Navalny and smart voting, Roskomnadzor installed American IP addresses, servers from which technical support for "smart voting" came.
                The developers of the smart voting application are companies associated not only with the United States, but with the Pentagon. You can't even fold 2 + 2. Zyuganov will soon be removed and replaced by the type of Rashkin or Grudinin who support Navalny and smart voting, and then how will you sing, gentlemen?
                The Communist Party of the Russian Federation is not a communist party for a long time, and this must be understood.
            3. -2
              17 September 2021 10: 58
              You, the enemies of the communists, did not surprise you this time either, you acted as you have ALWAYS.
              On the Internet, your "pre-election campaign" was not FOR your parties, but AGAINST the Communist Party of the Russian Federation.
              1. -5
                17 September 2021 11: 05
                Quote: tatra
                was not FOR your parties, but AGAINST the Communist Party

                But what if everyone else is embarrassed to openly express their preferences?
                With whom to mess with?
                1. 0
                  17 September 2021 11: 11
                  You, the anomalies of humanity, the enemies of the communists on the territory of the USSR, that under the USSR, that in your Perestroika, that 30 years after your capture of the USSR - ideology is malice AGAINST, both against the Bolshevik communists, and against the communists in your post-Soviet period /
                  FOR yourself, FOR what you yourself did - you have nothing.
                  And you are always trying to prove one thing, and you prove something completely different.
                  And on the Internet, according to the comments FOR the party, and by voting in the polls, which party will you vote for, the Communist Party won.
              2. +6
                17 September 2021 11: 13
                Quote: tatra
                On the Internet, your "pre-election campaign" was not FOR your parties, but AGAINST the Communist Party of the Russian Federation.

                Irina! We've even seen how:
              3. +2
                18 September 2021 11: 28
                Quote: tatra
                enemies of the communists, and this time they did not surprise, acted as ALWAYS


                mass psychology in Russia is now exactly the same as that of the Amers. Nobody thinks of himself as a proletarian, everyone is offended that they are not millionaires.
                1. 0
                  18 September 2021 12: 39
                  Quote: aybolyt678
                  Quote: tatra
                  enemies of the communists, and this time they did not surprise, acted as ALWAYS


                  mass psychology in Russia is now exactly the same as that of the Amers. Nobody thinks of himself as a proletarian, everyone is offended that they are not millionaires.

                  Precisely said! An illusion that makes it possible to rob ..
                  1. 0
                    18 September 2021 12: 46
                    Quote: Svarog
                    An illusion that makes it possible to rob ..

                    To continue robbing our country and our descendants, if we do not learn Socialism
                2. 0
                  20 September 2021 14: 14
                  Nobody imagines himself to be a proletarian, everyone is offended that they are not millionaires

                  Because there are, in principle, very few fools who want to "be content with an iron bowl of rice (or even eat quinoa at all) in order to be proud of their military might".
            4. +3
              17 September 2021 12: 06
              Quote: Boris55
              For the Communist Party? Do you want Russia to fall apart?

              The USSR was destroyed and Russia will be destroyed, this is not the same KP. When the Supreme Council voted on Belovezhskaya Pushcha, 111 deputies were members of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation.
              1. +6
                17 September 2021 21: 56
                Quote: tihonmarine
                The USSR was destroyed and Russia will be destroyed, this is not the same KP. When the Supreme Council voted on Belovezhskaya Pushcha, 111 deputies were members of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation.

                And now all the communists are in power, they just exchanged their membership cards for currency
            5. -2
              17 September 2021 12: 35
              Quote: Boris55
              Marxism is a doctrine of a provocative and imitative nature

              Marxism is primarily a methodology. For its time, it is revolutionary, but a hundred years ago it was clear that this was only a guide to action.
              The doctrine of the class struggle has not stood the test of time, but the doctrine of surplus value is relevant. And why are some so afraid of Marxism? There are no communists anymore, ideological contradictions are forgotten, the internal contradictions of Capitalism are only growing, as grandfather Lenin said ... laughing
              1. +1
                17 September 2021 14: 01
                Quote: aybolyt678
                The doctrine of the class struggle has not stood the test of time

                Why it could not stand in this struggle, at this stage capitalism has won. And everyone must answer to himself why.
                1. +2
                  17 September 2021 14: 52
                  Quote: tihonmarine
                  Why it could not stand in this struggle, at this stage capitalism has won. And everyone must answer to himself why.

                  management crisis. The managers are usually those who have not found themselves as a specialist, those who want more ... there is a negative selection.
            6. +3
              17 September 2021 21: 51
              Quote: Boris55
              For the Communist Party? Do you want Russia to fall apart?

              Is she now flourishing? Even though everything has its own Russia
          2. +3
            17 September 2021 10: 32
            For the Power of the Soviets, the Soviet Power, this is understandable, it is possible / necessary ... but what is the Communist Party of the Russian Federation about?
            1. +1
              17 September 2021 10: 34
              Quote: rocket757
              For the Power of the Soviets, the Soviet Power, this is understandable, it is possible / necessary ... but what is the Communist Party of the Russian Federation about?

              The Communist Party does not vote for anti-people laws .. at least for this reason, you need to vote for the Communist Party.
              1. -1
                17 September 2021 10: 41
                Quote: Svarog
                The Communist Party of the Russian Federation does not vote for anti-national laws.

                Well, how are these laws NOT ACCEPTED?
                I will not smear "porridge on a plate", this game in the form in which it is now, has no prospects, is not interesting ...
                On my own ... I have not voted AGAINST for a long time, it is futile ... only FOR, for moving forward. Or there is NO way at all that there is a stupid option, but which one is.
                1. +1
                  17 September 2021 10: 44
                  Quote: rocket757
                  Quote: Svarog
                  The Communist Party of the Russian Federation does not vote for anti-national laws.

                  Well, how are these laws NOT ACCEPTED?
                  I will not smear "porridge on a plate", this game in the form in which it is now, has no prospects, is not interesting ...

                  Do not forget who owns the majority in the Duma .. they pass anti-people laws .. and the Communist Party always votes against, if the Communist Party has a majority, the situation will change .. I generally agree with you .. regarding the Communist Party .. but this is the best there is. Everything else is just awful ..
                  1. 0
                    17 September 2021 12: 37
                    Unlike those who should have REMEMBERED, I have not forgotten anything ...
                    And again, I will not smear .... those who, as it were, followers, the right of the successors of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union look pale and in this they are only to blame, THEIR LEADERSHIP.
                    I will note that I myself was not, was not, and even left the Komsomol with a scandal and ... it was back in the USSR, and I did not sell pies on the street!
                    So, the film "Communist" and many others like it, I associate it with THAT PARTY, but the present ...
              2. -6
                17 September 2021 10: 42
                Quote: Svarog
                The Communist Party of the Russian Federation does not vote for anti-national laws ..

                Absolutely nothing depends on them, on their voting. Therefore, they can afford to throw dust in the eyes of the people, but in reality, when it was necessary to stand up for the people (when the retirement age was raised), the Communist Party of the Russian Federation gathered people in small groups on wastelands and blew steam into a whistle.

                The only time that something the Communist Party of the Russian Federation portrayed was when monetizing benefits - it blocked Leningradka. I still receive compensation of ~ 60 rubles. and some other ~ 100 rubles. So that you choke on them. You are the communists.

                You have a wealth of experience in fighting the bourgeoisie, but you are ashamed of even blocking transport routes (bourgeois cash flows). When and where did you hold at least one strike? So why do I have to for you?
                1. +3
                  17 September 2021 10: 50
                  Quote: Boris55
                  The Communist Party of the Russian Federation gathered people in small groups on wastelands and blew steam into a whistle.

                  I'm not going to justify the Communist Party .. and SJ .. I have a lot of questions for them too. But in this case, I think the best decision to vote for the Communist Party .. and you Boris for whom are you going to vote?
                  1. -4
                    17 September 2021 10: 54
                    Quote: Svarog
                    and you Boris for whom are you going to vote?

                    I have already voted for the Motherland. My party is the party of the Bolsheviks. The Ministry of Justice is not registered and as such, as a pariah, is not and therefore does not participate in the elections.

                    Read again the ideology of the Communist Party - their ideals.
                2. -2
                  17 September 2021 12: 41
                  Quote: Boris55
                  the richest experience in fighting the bourgeoisie, but you

                  The experience WAS with that party, those people from our past!
                  With what fright we have to choose a signboard, under which the real, necessary for us, for us, is not left ... just empty chatter!
                3. +4
                  17 September 2021 13: 48
                  Quote: Boris55
                  you are embarrassed to even block transport routes (bourgeois cash flows).

                  A call for riots? After all, one has only to start and how is it in the song "The revolution has a beginning, the revolution does not have an end ..."
              3. +3
                17 September 2021 13: 52
                The Communist Party is full of rich people .. they voted against the PR just for the sake of the rating. Who is the Communist Party supporter of the communist ideology? who knows Marx Lenin?
                1. +2
                  18 September 2021 22: 48
                  This is exactly how it is. Playing in bourgeois elections, one does not need to build the illusion that socialism can win: property is divided and NOBODY will voluntarily give it up, only with blood.
              4. +1
                17 September 2021 14: 26
                Quote: Svarog
                The Communist Party does not vote for anti-people laws .. at least for this reason, you need to vote for the Communist Party.

                When ratifying the Belovezhskaya agreements and denouncing the union treaty from the United RPRF-SDPR faction, represented by both its deputies V. Sheinis and O. Rumyantsev, voted for the ratification of the Belovezhskaya agreements, but did not participate in the vote to denounce the Union treaty.
                But here's what the overall picture of the vote looked like:

                on the issue of ratification of the Belovezhskaya Agreements, the votes were distributed as follows:

                for - 188 (76,1%)
                against - 6 (2,4%)
                abstained - 7 (2,8%)
                voted - 201 (81,4%)

                And here is how they voted to denounce the Union Treaty:

                for - 161 (65,2%)
                against - 3 (1,2%)
                abstained - 9 (3,6%)
                voted - 173 (70,0%)

                S. Baburin, N. Pavlov, V. Isakov, I. Konstantinov, S. Polozkov, V. Balala, P. Lysov voted against the resolution on the ratification of the Belovezhskaya agreements.

                V. Isakov, S. Baburin, P. Lysov voted against the denunciation of the Union Treaty.
                According to the Constitution, the Supreme Soviet was simply not empowered to make decisions of this kind - this was the prerogative of the Congress of People's Deputies.
      4. +6
        17 September 2021 10: 13
        Quote: tihonmarine
        And who allowed all these "Echoes of Moscow" and the notorious "Rains"

        Surprise .. but this is Gazprom ..
      5. +6
        17 September 2021 11: 09
        Quote: tihonmarine
        And who allowed all these "Echoes of Moscow" and the notorious "Rains" feeding on the money of the State Department and the Tavistock Institute?

        I'll tell you a little secret, "Muskva's Ear" is funded by Gazprom, and the gray, long-haired, curly wink the scoundrel of the Venedicts is entering the highest offices in the Kremlin.
      6. +6
        17 September 2021 13: 27
        Mikhalkov is still that anti-Soviet !!! In Soviet times, he shot normal films, and then he cut it off. However, why wonder being determines consciousness.

        With regard to external influence.
        There has always been an external factor, but it only affects the rate of development of those contradictions that exist in society, it can both slow them down and accelerate them. But the main factor what changes will be inherent in the very contradictions existing in society - for example, the contradiction between the social nature of production, but under capitalism, the private nature of the appropriation of the fruits of labor of workers. Contradiction? Contradiction! How does this power (my language does not dare to call it ours) relates to this problem, it is going to somehow resolve this contradiction - yes, it is vitally interested in preserving it, in preserving the current state of affairs. After all, their wealth is based on our poverty, their happiness is on our grief.
        Where will all this lead? According to my feelings, the number of people who consider this government, to put it mildly, hostile, is multiplying! When the quantity turns into quality is unknown, but there is no doubt that sooner or later this will happen.

        In this case, I regard Mikhalkov's message as an attempt to write off the problems caused by this power, which, if she wanted to, could fix it (though it has been doing the opposite for 30 years) to an external enemy. It's not us to say this, it's all of them. Probably the CIA adopted pension reforms, the Mossad raised the VAT, MI6 optimized medicine, along with education, the damned Ukrainians forced Roscosmos to send a "movie star" flying to make a film there, instead of real work. No where are they not to blame, really.
      7. +1
        17 September 2021 14: 12
        Quote: tihonmarine
        And who allowed all these "Echoes of Moscow" and the notorious "Rains" feeding on the money of the State Department and the Tavistock Institute.

        Too lazy to know who finances Echo of Moscow?
        Seems to you infa does not pass through the border laughing
        Venediktov, a bad man and friend of Peskov, is pushing the economy in, the standard of living is lowering, the ruble is lowered, the radish. Thank God, the new culprits, otherwise all Lenin and the Bolsheviks, the Pechenegs and the Polovtsy, Hitler and Nicholas II are to blame. Well, they do not give life to improve in any way, everything is harmful and harmful.
    2. 0
      17 September 2021 10: 00
      With United Russia, a losing option emerges - if they get few votes, then you can blame everything on the special operation of Western bots, and if they get 104%, then you can blame them on charges of cheating too, they say, setting up a set-up ... laughing
      1. 0
        17 September 2021 10: 08
        Quote: Finches
        United Russia has no losing option

        This is understandable and not even offensive! Precisely because the rest are no one and they can not be called.
        We have no one and no one to compete with ... alas, alas, the ability to live in a responsible society, to create it, to create more or less reasonable, understandable rules, never happened in our country.
      2. -1
        17 September 2021 10: 11
        Quote: Finches
        United Russia has no losing option

        We choose the state ideology of the winning party in the elections for the next five years. No matter which party wins - the ideology of all parties registered in the Ministry of Justice and admitted to the elections does not go beyond the dominant concept - the life of society. Therefore, the proverb is true: "Vote, do not vote, you will still get the same concept." The difference for the people lies in minor shifts in one direction or another, which do not go beyond what is permissible in the concept.
        1. -5
          17 September 2021 10: 32
          Is that why I have not been in the polls since 1996?
        2. -2
          17 September 2021 10: 34
          Quote: Boris55
          The difference for the people lies in minor shifts in one direction or another, which do not go beyond what is permissible in the concept.

          This is understandable, the way it is ...
        3. +3
          17 September 2021 22: 27
          Quote: Boris55
          We choose the state ideology of the winning party in the elections for the next five years.

          Say "victorious", day one ...
      3. -3
        17 September 2021 10: 19
        Quote: Finches
        For United Russia, a losing scenario emerges - if they get too few votes, then you can blame everything on the special operation of Western bots, and if they get 104%, then you can blame them on charges of cheating too, they say, setting up a set-up.

        Don’t bother, but even on the site you can see that the number of bots is increasing.
      4. +3
        17 September 2021 11: 00
        Quote: Finches
        they say set up set up ...

        Exactly... laughing
      5. 0
        17 September 2021 13: 46
        Quote: Finches
        United Russia has no losing option

        But from this it will not become better and blame on anyone it will not work. You give carrots 200, and potatoes 150 and where will the EP go? Is America to blame again?
      6. +1
        18 September 2021 05: 12
        Quote: Finches
        United Russia has no losing option

        A crow sits on a tree, cheese in its mouth. A fox runs by:
        - Crow, will you go to the polls?
        - No.
        The cheese fell out, and the Crow thinks: "And if I said yes, what would change?"

        ➡ Source: https://publizist.ru/blogs/107374/40801/-
  2. 0
    17 September 2021 09: 25
    Information warfare is certainly not new, it has been going on since the days of Ivan IV "the Terrible".
    Now only this information war is no longer in the media, in the countries of Russia's opponents, but also in "our" media. And this information has become publicly available on the Internet and on television, and earlier only on Radio Liberty.
    But our power holders are to blame for the fact that a part of society supports this war on our territory, seeing that it contains a lot of bitter truth about corruption, theft, and the absence of a strategy for the development of society and entrepreneurship.
    If there were no reasons for criticism on our part, then the interventions would not be effective.
    1. -2
      17 September 2021 10: 24
      Quote: Peter is not the first
      But our power holders are to blame for the fact that a part of society supports this war on our territory, seeing that it contains a lot of bitter truth about corruption, theft, and the absence of a strategy for the development of society and entrepreneurship.

      This is how the "Maidans" began in Ukraine, and we all see what it resulted in.
      Any good undertakings are always used by crooks and people with dirty hands, and as a result, power is in their hands, and those who brought them to power are crushed like bedbugs.
      1. +3
        17 September 2021 11: 03
        Yes, all these coups d'état on the territory of the captured USSR are arranged by the same enemies of the communists as a blueprint, in order to take power from each other. What changes for the better for the country and the people can we expect from them?
        1. -2
          17 September 2021 11: 48
          Quote: tatra
          What changes for the better for the country and the people can we expect from them?

          So these coups are arranged, not for the rays of life of the people of this country.
          But the wishes of the "revolutionaries" are supposedly good, here Napoleon (with a crowd of hangers-on) went to Russia to free the people of Russia (and from whom and from what, if his people did not live better), then Wilhelm and the Habsburgs with the same slogan ( although the latter was saved by Nicholas I from the revolution), then "The guy from Braunau from near Linz", went to liberate Russia from the Bolsheviks and Jews. Well, it seems that in 1991 the Bolsheviks left, the "democrats" came, but no, they are again going to liberate Russia from Putin. And since 1812, someone has asked Russia "Do you want this, do you need this?" Well, I'm not tired of lying, and playing the bagpipes for so many years, well, at least the record was changed.
          But the most interesting thing is that this "bagpipe orchestra" was joined by the limitrophes, who 200 years ago, and even 100 years were someone's vassals and serfs, and suddenly they became liberators. It would be better to go to the churchyard and look at the graves of their ancestors, and find out who they were at that recent time.
          1. 0
            20 September 2021 14: 19
            here Napoleon (with a crowd of hangers-on) went to Russia to free the people of Russia

            What? Napoleon unleashed a war against the Russian Empire in order to force the latter to "join" the "continental blockade" against Great Britain, which was extremely disadvantageous to it.
      2. +3
        17 September 2021 13: 43
        Quote: tihonmarine
        This is how the "Maidans" began in Ukraine, and we all see what it resulted in.

        You outlined Yarovaya's speech, where she said that without corruption the Russian state would perish. The choice is small or to live with thieves or there will be no country. Paradox.
        1. -1
          17 September 2021 14: 29
          Quote: Silvestr
          You outlined Yarovaya's speech

          And who is Yarovaya to take notes?
          1. +3
            17 September 2021 17: 27
            Quote: tihonmarine
            And who is Yarovaya,

            She! You repeat her words exactly, Deputy Chairman of the State Duma of the Russian Federation request
            1. -1
              17 September 2021 17: 29
              Quote: Silvestr
              She! You repeat her words exactly, Deputy Chairman of the State Duma of the Russian Federation

              I do not live in Russia, and whoever is in the State Duma is a dark forest for me, I would like to deal with my own.
  3. -3
    17 September 2021 09: 34
    Yes, the old man won't tell. Chipping alone is worth it.
    1. -3
      17 September 2021 13: 44
      You have apparently already been chipped, and more than once, if such confidence in action laughing
      1. +2
        17 September 2021 14: 07
        Unlike you, no. Mikhalkov has, so to speak, age-related changes in the brain. In his years, this happens, what can you do. Are you having the same problem?
        1. -6
          17 September 2021 14: 41
          Keep consuming laughing We'll watch, it's so funny! wink
    2. 0
      22 September 2021 12: 41
      chipping has long been in the world !!!! take away the teenager's smartphone and see how he will suffer
  4. -7
    17 September 2021 09: 43
    ***

    Hey, bluebirds!

    Rey!

    Overseas! ...

    ***
  5. +1
    17 September 2021 09: 46
    Mikhalkov is afraid that the village will be taken away from him and the serfs laughing
    The question is, why should they interfere in the elections, if they consider the same people and always wins the EP?
    Elections without choice with a known outcome. It loves horror to catch up with the new nobility, and suddenly Aurora will be drawn
    1. +2
      17 September 2021 10: 09
      Quote: Silvestr
      A tricky question - why should they interfere in the elections?

      And even if they are communists, the main thing is not Putin.
      1. +8
        17 September 2021 10: 22
        Quote: Dart2027

        And even if they are communists, the main thing is not Putin.

        Come on .. Would make Putin and all his friends not shaking hands .. in other words, they would not be allowed to go to the West and the assets were arrested .. But for some reason they don’t do it .. and they are not particularly outraged about him .. Our elite has long been serving their interests, which can be seen by who is the shareholder of natural resources, who is on the board of directors of Sberbank .. the same pension reform was carried out under the dictation of the IMF .. All this is a game and a screen for the unreasonable .. It would be wrong, first of all, anyone who respects himself and citizens, the president banned the export of money over the hill .. and would force them to work for their own economy .. why there .. a president who respects his citizens would not change the Constitution for himself and would not violate his promises in public. And of course, the genocide in the form of the pension reform would not become obsolete ... and the import of migrant workers by the millions ...
        1. -1
          17 September 2021 13: 29
          Quote: Svarog
          in other words, they would not be allowed to go to the west and the assets would be arrested

          Putin? Don't you confuse him with yourself?
      2. +4
        17 September 2021 13: 37
        Quote: Dart2027
        And even if they are communists, the main thing is not Putin.

        Who knows, maybe Putin is the one who is dear to their hearts
        1. -3
          17 September 2021 13: 46
          Quote: Silvestr
          Who knows

          All kinds of NGOs that have been muddying the waters for many years.
          1. +6
            17 September 2021 14: 07
            Quote: Dart2027
            All kinds of NGOs that have been muddying the waters for many years.

            Come on! NCOs moved the pension reform, raised food prices, canceled the indexation of pensions? Our government is the best non-profit organization, no one will make it worse for us than they
            1. -5
              17 September 2021 16: 01
              Quote: Silvestr
              your power is the best NGO, no one will make us worse than them

              That is, we do not deny the fact that they muddy the waters?
              Quote: Silvestr
              NGOs moved pension reform

              Demographic aging is a problem in all developed countries. The rest is a consequence.
              1. +3
                17 September 2021 17: 26
                Quote: Dart2027
                That is, we do not deny the fact that they muddy the waters?

                Power - of course
                Quote: Dart2027
                Demographic aging is a problem in all developed countries.

                laughing even Putin has already poiznalsya-made a mistake with the reform, they wanted to stash pensions, but it turned out more expensive. The IMF recommended- Putin replied "Yes!"
                1. -3
                  18 September 2021 07: 27
                  Quote: Silvestr
                  Power - of course

                  But there is muddy.
                  Quote: Silvestr
                  even Putin has already known

                  Recently there was an article about the fact that in France there will be an increase in PV (from 2028), also Putin?
  6. +2
    17 September 2021 09: 49
    Quote: Peter is not the first
    If there were no reasons from our side for criticism

    There will always be a reason, the main thing here is to inflate it well and give it, and this is a matter of technology, for them everything is well worked out here
  7. +7
    17 September 2021 10: 16
    Regarding the interference of foreign agents in the elections, by the way
    State Duma deputy from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation Denis Parfenov sent a demand to the CEC and the Ministry of Justice to recognize the United Russia party as a foreign agent. The statement says that the United Russia receives funding from foreign sources. In particular, in 2020, United Russia received 6 million rubles from Splat Global LLC (3 million rubles were returned), while one of the owners of the company - the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development - is registered in the UK. ER received another 500 thousand rubles from PJSC Yaroslavl Radio Plant, whose shareholders are, in particular, The Prosperity Quest Fund (Cayman Islands), citizens of the Republics of Latvia and Belarus, Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan, as well as JSC RTI, a shareholder which, in particular, is PJSC AFK Sistema (directly and through PJSC MTS-Bank). The shareholders of Sistema JSFC, in turn, according to information from the SPARK Interfax database, are firms from the USA, Iceland, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy and the UK ...

    Here they are, foreign agents, it turns out :)
    1. -1
      17 September 2021 12: 05
      Quote: Avior
      Here they are, foreign agents, it turns out :)
      Ty ... Given the inclusion in the lists of candidates to the State Duma from the Communist Party, such "communists" as Vitaly Petrov, Alexander Syrov and the presence in the lists of repeatedly convicted for mercenary crimes, this is just a trifle fool Moreover, a statement about this was made by members of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation who are not indifferent to the ongoing negative processes in the party ...
    2. +3
      17 September 2021 14: 01
      Quote: Avior
      Here they are, foreign agents, it turns out :)

      It turns out that the wrong ones were announced. The error came out
      1. +6
        17 September 2021 14: 51
        Let's see how the Ministry of Justice will react to the deputy's request.
        Or once again we will see that the law, that the tongue ....: ((
  8. +5
    17 September 2021 10: 40
    We reason beautifully)) As if there were no problems, as if no one had stolen by the billions, as if there were no yachts, planes, villas in Italy, Czech Republic, Montenegro, etc. Is all the West to blame again?) Well, the same West to which we are trying hard to build our resources, and which so depends on their uninterrupted supply. All these arguments about the "hand of the West" remind me of that inconceivable shiza that attacked the USSR in the 20-30s of the last century, when people in every defective toilet saw an insidious conspiracy of the imperialists - alo alo, wake up! Enough already walking on the same rake) It is necessary to put boots and eggs in different baskets - do we objectively have a problem of increasing the flow of "killed on the head" laws from the State Duma? Do we have a problem of "high" corruption that has not been resolved for decades? Do the representatives of the establishment have arrays of money and real estate, which, formally, with their salaries should not be? Is there a problem of political stagnation and unrestrained period from the period of promises? Is there a problem that "strategy 2020" is not implemented from the word in any way? If these and many other problems exist, you must agree that the ground for natural discontent within the country exists and is developing. And "bot farms" are not needed here - there are enough people dissatisfied with all this - actively or passively manifesting it. If these problems do not exist, then we are talking about some other country.

    In general, the texts in which the author proves the "hand of the West" in our affairs is either paid material or a manifestation of fantastic imagination. At the moment, we have devoured an extremely developed apparatus of prohibition, control and suppression inside the country - even though we are still inferior to the PRC in this, we have all the tools for blocking some Western "unwanted" resources, Western "foreign agents" are imprisoned and cut off from funding , the work of Western funds is what is called "under the microscope." In the country itself, there are "troll factories" in quantities sufficient to operate outside the country, that is, the capacities are clearly excessive for internal requests for opposition. Such conditions make the work of the "West", if it takes place, incredibly difficult because, unlike in the 90s, the West has no instruments of legal influence inside the country. And if you say the opposite, then ask yourself a question, if such influence remains sufficiently, then what competencies of our government can we talk about after that? Outside the country, the impact is rather limited, due to the significant degree of our readiness for hostile actions in the information environment - both technical and, conventionally speaking, "mobilization" (packages of laws, trolls).

    I will end by saying that a protest cannot be "incited" where there are no objective and long-term conditions for it. In this case, the "excited" process only shifts in time, relative to its spontaneous occurrence. If protest moods are suppressed and dispersed, they do not disappear, this is an illusion. If all the conditions are preserved, dissatisfied citizens, unable to express a protest, simply reorganize into a formation more resistant to suppression, or strive to leave the system - taking their funds and minds with them. Everything is like in physics, ladies and gentlemen. Leaving the system of such people leads to the fact that the product of all kinds, which these people gave back (would) within the system, have to be purchased abroad, from the same "insidious west", in other words, our desire to suppress internal protest in the future only pushes us into embrace to a potential enemy all the stronger.
    1. +5
      17 September 2021 10: 57
      Quote: Knell Wardenheart
      In general, the texts in which the author proves the "hand of the West" in our affairs is either paid material or a manifestation of fantastic imagination.

      Awesome comment! good drinks+100500
      It is a pity that there are too many letters for turboputriots, they will read it obliquely. but rather just put the Mendel without reading it.
  9. +2
    17 September 2021 10: 52
    The thief's hat is on fire.
  10. +3
    17 September 2021 11: 09
    Mr. Mikhalkov! You wouldn't bother to explain politics, but explained your directorial ideas for the films: "The Barber of Siberia", "Burnt by the Sun - 2", "Sunstroke" ...
    And with "smart voting" everything is simple. This is an alternative to voting “for the herd”. When all a well-known candidate is opposed by a handful of unknown (in the field of creation) personalities, because real opponents are simply not included in the lists (this is about the same as with Grudinin and Platoshkin) ...
  11. +6
    17 September 2021 11: 56
    I don’t deny the State Department’s role in corrupting our country, but they simply add spices to our porridge. After all, it was not the State Department that raised the retirement age. The State Department did not distribute land plots. Or does this monster add palm oil to our food? All this is done by the relatives of the mighty of this world. For some, even a hundred-year retirement age is not terrible. And for someone it is a disability, loss of health. And all these "Echoes of Moscow" and others are fed by our own corporations. Someone wants to be like the West, but the same West does not give them. Like, why did you wear my clothes.
    1. +1
      17 September 2021 13: 14
      Quote: nikvic46
      I do not deny the role of the State Department in corrupting our country.

      But to try on for ourselves ... we ourselves are first, secondly ... it is our fault that this \ so happened to us!
      We must start with this, on a long journey to correct OUR MISTAKES!
      1. +3
        17 September 2021 15: 20
        Victor. I have already tried on recently bought shoes. You have to spend 10000 rubles. But if you are talking about the purity of the soul, then this has been happening in her since childhood. However, like every normal person. "Purity of the soul is a sign of memory loss."
        1. 0
          17 September 2021 15: 43
          Quote: nikvic46
          "The purity of the soul is a sign of memory loss."

          Those. ability to think, remember, etc. excludes the option to have good intentions in relation to not only yourself?
          Somehow it's ... gloomy.
          1. +1
            17 September 2021 18: 17
            Victor. Here, this aphorism is about something else. At our age, many older comrades talk about their lives in such a way as if there were no moments in their life for which one could be ashamed, that is, as if they had lived a life without sins. And this does not happen in life. Either you offend someone with a word, or with an action, for which it becomes painful at age.
            1. 0
              17 September 2021 18: 47
              This is understandable ... our society is not a place for angels, they do not survive in it.
              For myself, except to arrange weighing, bad versus good, what will outweigh ??? Although, there are actions that cannot be weighed ...
              This also happens.
  12. 0
    17 September 2021 14: 08
    What is the "trick" ... supporters of certain parties will simply bypass their opponents and ALL WORKS!
    Million times have already been proven that playing against your opponents, without doing anything correct, positive, NOTHING sensible CAN BE ACHIEVED!
    It is sad, it disappoints even those who were at least somehow, someone was ready to support!
    It is clear that the victory will remain with the one who is already sitting in important places, nestled and has the opportunity to pull up not frail such resources, including and administrative !!!
    I just want to send all those fighters to school, albeit political education! There were a lot of sensible skills, knowledge was given!
  13. 0
    17 September 2021 15: 32
    Regarding interference in the elections, you can quote from the American TV series Friends: "They don't know what we know, they know what we know".
  14. 0
    17 September 2021 19: 54
    And why was Echo of Moscow not mentioned as a foreign agent? It is no different from the Rain, if not worse.
    1. +5
      17 September 2021 22: 00
      Quote: tank64rus
      And why was Echo of Moscow not mentioned as a foreign agent?

      Then Gazprom should be declared a property of Europe
      1. +2
        18 September 2021 11: 05
        Yes, it is if you look at the shareholders of this organization. And Kolya from Urengoy, with his sobs for the German soldiers, did not form from scratch.
      2. 0
        20 September 2021 12: 51
        Gazprom is already denationalized. Our common subsoil is in the hands of private traders. And here about Gazprom-media: https://www.ridus.ru/news/65505. So it turns out that our (or no longer) country is the resource base of the world. And the mass media are engaged in nothing more than fooling citizens, while simultaneously receiving super profits.
  15. +1
    17 September 2021 20: 04
    Quote: Boris55
    Quote: aleksejkabanets
    as Stalin would have called the current state and its "leaders".

    Do you mean how Stalin would call Putin? His companion, the successor of his work in new circumstances.

    To understand this, you need to answer only two questions:
    Which country did Stalin accept and which one did he leave?
    What country did Putin accept and what is it like?

    People! What was it? fool
  16. +4
    18 September 2021 04: 30
    The whole problem is that the authorities have completely discredited themselves. Complete loss of confidence among the people. Ox people are watching Navalny, etc.
    Because the daily "malakhovshchina" and "kiselevschina" are already tired.
  17. 0
    20 September 2021 14: 24
    A. .. Mr. N. Mikhalkov again. Well, the same honored director who praised the CPSU under the Union, under B.N. Yeltsin - Yeltsin ...
  18. 0
    21 September 2021 13: 23
    Horses and people mingled in a heap. The master is working out his flight with the Grefovsky savings bank.
  19. 0
    14 October 2021 11: 22
    One of the centers of anti-Russian interference is Nikita Sergeevich himself, a monarchist-Russophobe-anti-Soviet under the guise of a pseudo-patriot.