Trump said that by 2022-2024, the United States may cease to exist

68

The 45th President of the United States, Donald Trump, who previously announced his readiness to take part in the presidential race in 2024, made a resonant statement. This statement is being discussed today both in the United States itself and abroad.

According to Donald Trump, today America is "going downhill." The former head of the American state noted that "Biden's policies are leading the country into the abyss." He rebuked the incumbent President of the United States for committing one mistake after another, including a "mediocre operation to withdraw troops from Afghanistan, vague decisions to combat the" Chinese virus. " Trump calls the coronavirus COVID-19 Chinese.



But these tirades of the ex-president of the United States are not resonant. Trump, in an interview with Newsmax, said that Americans are now awaiting elections in 2022 (Congress) and 2024 (presidential). But, according to the 45th President of the United States, by that time "we may not have a country left."

Trump:

We're going downhill. There may be no elections, since there may not be a country in which they are held. The United States may cease to exist if this person continues to make his terrible decisions as president.

Earlier, Trump called on Joe Biden to step down. This call was made after the events in Kabul, which went to the Taliban (* a terrorist group banned in Russia).

Against this background, data from a study of public opinion on the subject of trust in the current president were announced. It turned out that Biden currently has the lowest level of approval from the Americans since his inauguration. It is 44%. At the same time, the number of those who disapprove of the decision of the head of state exceeded 50 percent.
68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -6
    17 September 2021 07: 32
    That's right, Trump is the last, and he knows it.
    Bidon is never a president-level politician. And this is not to our advantage in Russia. The collapse of the United States - a bunch of countries with nuclear weapons, such a bunch of problems for everyone!
    For Russia, the incentive in the development of the military-industrial complex will disappear - also not very good.
    1. +3
      17 September 2021 07: 50
      What else can the expresident say? He does not want to wait for 2024, he hopes the grandfather will be sent earlier and he will again take part in the elections
      1. 0
        17 September 2021 10: 23
        Quote from TigerRR
        What else can the expresident say? He does not want to wait for 2024, he hopes the grandfather will be sent earlier and he will again take part in the elections

        So if it involves the collapse of the States, then why the elections? And if then the elections, then the elections of whom, who can he become, if the states are divided into autonomies? Has he chosen his state?
        1. 0
          17 September 2021 11: 08
          Autonomy, you say? So the United States has long been a bunch of "autonomous" states - every state, its own laws! For example: driver's licenses are not valid in all states, and other documents ... It's time to rename the USA to AUTONOMOUS STATES OF NORTH AMERICA, that is, USA! The only thing that unites them is taxation! Tax in the states is a sacred thing - not only one intelligence officer fell on the hook of the FBI / CIA because of spending more officially (declared) amount earned.
    2. Kuz
      +23
      17 September 2021 07: 51
      Quote: Cheshire
      That's right, Trump is the last and he knows it

      hi After myself, he asked not to borrow?
      1. +2
        17 September 2021 07: 58
        Quote: Kuz
        : Cheshire
        That's right, Trump is the last and he knows it

        After myself, he asked not to borrow?

        laughing
        It would be possible to borrow that, but their time has passed ...
        hi
    3. +6
      17 September 2021 08: 36
      Quote: Cheshire
      Collapse of the USA - a bunch of countries with nuclear weapons

      Although the USSR collapsed, we were not finished off because of nuclear weapons. Disarmament primarily concerned the Union republics and Russia was allowed to inherit the Soviet arsenal, and it began to be actively chaotic a little later, when all nuclear weapons were exported to Russia, they organized a default for us and later attacked Yugoslavia, after which Yeltsin got angry and started the story. Therefore, the project - the United States must be closed carefully ...
      1. +3
        17 September 2021 08: 52
        Quote: hrych
        Therefore, the project - the United States must be closed carefully ...

        Exactly. I also meant it, it was just too lazy to paint in such detail.
        Many times, reading your balanced and detailed comments, I catch myself thinking about the similarity of thinking and conclusions.
        hi
      2. -2
        17 September 2021 09: 03
        Quote: hrych
        when all nuclear weapons were taken out to Russia, they organized a default for us and later attacked Yugoslavia, Then Yeltsin got angry and unfolded the story. Therefore, the project - the United States must be closed carefully ...

        Mdyayaya, you have a more subtle and humane approach, breaking into Yellowstone is not your method.
        That's right, we will roll up slowly, into a roll! good wassat
      3. +2
        17 September 2021 13: 27
        Quote: hrych
        project - the USA needs to be closed carefully ...

        Boston startup in 1773, the military-financial pyramid came to the point of fragmentation. Yes
    4. -3
      17 September 2021 09: 10
      Quote: Cheshire
      And this is not to our advantage in Russia. The collapse of the United States - a bunch of countries with nuclear weapons, such a bunch of problems for everyone!
      For Russia, the incentive in the development of the military-industrial complex will disappear - also not very good.

      Soooo, why leave America?
      1. +4
        17 September 2021 09: 45
        It is easier for us to talk with one country (I would leave it), but it cannot be kept in a heap, it is spreading. Little depends on us. hi
        1. -8
          17 September 2021 09: 56
          Quote: Cheshire
          It is easier for us to talk with one country (I would leave it), but it cannot be kept in a heap, it is spreading.

          I get it, I’m postponing the eraser! I wanted to erase it to hell with the globe, so as not to annoy.
          Quote: Cheshire
          Little depends on us.

          That's for sure!
          And what if Putin propose to privatize / buy out America and start with the privatization of itself, I'm not afraid of this word, the damned dollar! good
          Then we will privatize everything there, we will move there and open the scrap metal collection facilities, there is infrastructure, then this, and we will move them here for a while, well, so that we can build cities with a shigu in Siberia, repair roads, and install sewers.
          Great, isn't it ?! wassat drinks
          1. +2
            17 September 2021 10: 46
            Quote: Stroporez
            And what if Putin propose to privatize / buy out America and start with the privatization of itself, I'm not afraid of this word, the damned dollar!
            Then we will privatize everything there, we will move there and open the scrap metal collection facilities, there is infrastructure, then this, and we will move them here for a while, well, so that we can build cities with a shigu in Siberia, repair roads, and install sewers.
            Great, isn't it ?!

            Not the worst option, although after this we will become a temple on the hill and a school of parasites will reach out to us. Do we need it? request
            Quote: Stroporez
            I wanted to erase it to hell with the globe, so as not to annoy.

            Stalin's name strait? I’m all for it, and it’ll only hurt us, though only a little). drinks
            1. -4
              17 September 2021 10: 51
              Quote: Cheshire
              Not the worst option, although after this we will become a temple on the hill and a school of parasites will reach out to us. Do we need it?

              Well, at least we will stay a little wink
              Quote: Cheshire
              Stalin's name strait? I’m all for it, and it’ll only hurt us, though only a little).

              But the galley worker still promised paradise to us, so some solid nishtyaks drinks
    5. +3
      17 September 2021 09: 41
      whites will flee to Australia, but where are the Latinos?
      who will cut m \ scraps throughout North America- ??
      1. The comment was deleted.
    6. 0
      18 September 2021 12: 23
      Quote: Cheshire
      That's right, Trump is the last, and he knows it.

      Is the capitalist West rotting again? It seems to have been already ... 40 years ago.
  2. +3
    17 September 2021 07: 38
    As much as we would not like it, but no.
    Their ship is big, it will take a long time to sink ...
    1. +6
      17 September 2021 07: 46
      Quote: 75Sergey
      Their ship is big, it will take a long time to sink ...

      The USSR was even bigger, ended in 1 day.
      Until now, they cannot figure out how to collect something from its debris.
      1. 0
        17 September 2021 09: 04
        Times are not the same
        1. +2
          17 September 2021 09: 41
          Quote: 75Sergey
          Times are not the same

          Excuses. Everything will always interfere with everyone. You have to do it.
          1. -1
            17 September 2021 11: 04
            What are you doing for this?
            1. +2
              17 September 2021 11: 12
              Quote: 75Sergey
              What are you doing for this?

              For collecting debris into one piece? My level of decision-making is not the same, but if possible, I will join those who do, and not those who groan that everything is bad.
      2. +3
        17 September 2021 10: 29
        The USSR was even bigger, ended in 1 day.
        Far from one. Obvious and flashy symptoms got out with the beginning of perestroika (approximately). But the decay began even earlier.
        1. +2
          17 September 2021 10: 51
          America also stinks for a long time, rotting for a long time. And it will fall in 1-2 days, as soon as someone starts.
          1. -2
            17 September 2021 11: 05
            America will collapse immediately, if only there is evidence that they did not land on the moon!
            1. 0
              17 September 2021 11: 13
              Quote: 75Sergey
              America will collapse immediately, if only there is evidence that they did not land on the moon!

              What was the cause? There is evidence, the USA is in place)
          2. 0
            17 September 2021 11: 06
            Get started, we'll support you. Ready to raise and hold the banner?
            1. +2
              17 September 2021 11: 15
              Quote: 75Sergey
              Get started, we'll support you. Ready to raise and hold the banner?

              Who are you, and what is your support worth?
  3. 0
    17 September 2021 07: 38
    A cuckoo HAITs a rooster for HAITs a cuckoo. (Almost I.A. Krylov, but in modern realities) crying
  4. +1
    17 September 2021 07: 39
    by 2022-2024 the USA may cease to exist

    But it would be nice ...
    1. +3
      17 September 2021 08: 47
      and I believe in Agent Donald, he knows better from his gut.
      vote for great texas and the rest of the remains.
      and let our Alaska join the Crimea, after the will of the Exkimos and the rest of the democratic community.
      1. 0
        17 September 2021 10: 30
        and I believe in Agent Donald,


        I also laughing
        1. +2
          17 September 2021 10: 31
          Quote: Region-25.rus
          I also

          Shhhhhh, he was already given a colonel-general belay
          1. 0
            17 September 2021 10: 33
            Shhhhhh, he was already given a colonel-general
            well, the main thing is that "Trump is ours!" fellow (SHUT)
            1. -2
              17 September 2021 10: 36
              Quote: Region-25.rus
              well, the main thing is that "Trump is ours!" (harness)

              What a joke here! After all, America kirdyk is just about, it is necessary to stake out the acceptance of scrap as soon as possible, there are heaps of polish! good drinks
    2. -2
      17 September 2021 09: 04
      Quote: Xlor

      But it would be nice ...

      Wow, let's live !!!!!!
  5. +2
    17 September 2021 07: 42
    Trump said that by 2022-2024, the United States may cease to exist
    Oh how. Now the Trump agent has decided to earn some money as a prophet !!! Well done!
    1. +4
      17 September 2021 07: 45
      Nope! Rather, he hints that only he can save America.
      Superman is old, old ...
      1. +3
        17 September 2021 07: 55
        The hint is clear, BUT !!! no one has ever loved the prophets!
        For those who wish, they will move to the very top, not the most successful pre-election move ...
        However, I am a person and of that past era, there are many things that people, the crowd, the layman are guided by now, making a choice, I do not understand AT ALL!
        Alas, alas, we do not keep up with the "fashionable" trends ... and I don’t want to, in general.
  6. +4
    17 September 2021 07: 43
    ... including the "mediocre operation to withdraw troops from Afghanistan, vague decisions to combat the" Chinese virus. " Chinese Trump is called the coronavirus COVID-19

    At the same time, Trump is somehow modestly silent that the decision to withdraw troops from Afghanistan by May 1, 2021 is his, Trump's, decision, and his administration signed an agreement with the Taliban.
    About the fight against coronavirus, Trump himself did not do any better, it cost him the presidency.
    1. +5
      17 September 2021 08: 18
      The question is not what to get out of Afgan, but how to get out. The key point of the Afghan question is Pakistan. For the sake of PR and hype, Obama organized a circus with the assassination of Bin Laden, on the territory of a sovereign, nuclear state. And also because of the Salalah incident, when the US attacked the Pakistani military in the same year. What was the last straw. As a result, all American military bases were removed from Pakistani territory, Pakistan complicated logistics for the Afghan occupiers and began hybrid actions. Returned to support the Taliban movement. He also strengthened Pakistani-Chinese cooperation. This, as one of the leading results of the Syrian war - the deposition of Turkey, when the ruling caste was cleaned up and external control was liquidated. So the more terrible result of the Afghan campaign is the loss of Pakistan, as an important ally of the United States, and rather its transition to the enemy's camp.
      1. -3
        17 September 2021 08: 33
        All this was in any case long before Trump's decision to withdraw
        1. +2
          17 September 2021 08: 56
          By the time of Trump's rule, the point of no return had passed. Obama provided this. And the current Afghan disgrace is 90% of the merit of Obama and only 10% of Biden, who was forced to do this, unless the flight itself turned out to be extremely dumb. In defense of Biden, it was difficult to calculate that the lightning defeat of the Afghan army, or rather that it simply fled, abandoning its weapons. The Americans very quickly withdrew the troops and everything would be fine if the collaborators held out for some time, and they were left with a large and well-equipped army. In addition to the competent defeat of the centers of the Northern Alliance, cutting off from the border and eliminating communications, which is a clear trace of Pakistani strategists, the Revolution against the created drug-homo-building took place in Afghanistan. The Taliban were just riding the wave. A similar situation was with the Revolution in Iran. Here, the multimillion-dollar masses are set in motion and no weapons and punitive actions can stop the process. There was absolutely nothing Biden could do about it.
      2. 0
        17 September 2021 09: 08
        And how it was necessary to come out, what is your vision of this problem and the ways of its solution?
        1. +4
          17 September 2021 10: 05
          We need to decide what they wanted in the United States. Those. a kind of dismemberment of Afgan into parts. Northern Alliance, Central Government and Taliban Areas. Daeshaks transferred from Iraq and the Levant create chaos and spoil their neighbors in the near-Kardon areas. This is a calculation for many years ahead and is not devoid of logic. A kind of system of checks and balances to burn for decades and set fire to Iran, Central Asia, Pakistan and China. Especially the Uyguria, Baluchistan, the Tribal Zone, etc. It was necessary not to enter, it would not be necessary to leave. And since we entered and decided to leave, then without sudden movements. Once they left, there was no need to return for evacuation under public pressure and prolong the shame in time, wait for a terrorist attack, etc. The initial, lightning-fast departure was a brilliant operation, but again the mongrels sagged psychologically and panic began. Those. they had to be psychologically prepared, withdrawn gradually, stabilize the front with the Taliban, create defensive lines, etc.
          1. +2
            17 September 2021 11: 14
            Well, how "without sudden movements", is it one by one?
            A holy place is never empty, if they left no one in their place, then this place would also be occupied by the Taliban.
            When we left, we were left with the Najibulah government, which, without support, was able to withstand for a long time against the forces supported by the United States, China, etc., and with our support could stand for an indefinitely long time.
            But at that time we ourselves were on our way.
            1. +2
              17 September 2021 11: 46
              So the Americans did not leave an empty space, but a 300 thousandth army, armed to the teeth, as well as more than 10 thousand daeshaks. They would come out in stages, would not frighten collaborators, would organize defense lines, in the same Panjshir, in Herat, etc. We would not make the drug economy, but a self-sufficient state. You look and would have held out longer than Najibullah. Personnel appointments need the right ones. Not to put a snotty and thieving Ghani, but how Najibullah, betrayed by everyone, did not run, did not abandon his people and died.
      3. -1
        17 September 2021 09: 31
        Quote: hrych
        For the sake of PR and hype, Obama organized a circus with the assassination of Bin Laden, on the territory of a sovereign, nuclear state.

        Well, what did you have to do with him? Issue a Schengen, or what?

        But seriously, as far as I remember, Pakistan itself was also very "in action" in this operation, regularly supplying the Yankees with intelligence information for several years. Bin Laden himself was like a bone in his throat - but they could neither betray this "dear guest", nor even quietly remove him themselves. After all, this would cause great dissatisfaction with a certain part of Pakistani society, and they already have their own problems there.
        Nothing confuses you in your version? How could the air defense systems of a "sovereign nuclear state" calmly let an entire assault squadron into their territory - in fact, giving it an air corridor all the way to Osama's house? But there are more than 250 kilometers across Pakistani territory from the nearest American base in Afghan Jalalabad, and even practically a suburb of the country's capital Islamabad (that is, a specially protected perimeter).

        And even the "tacit support" of the Taliban is also mostly an internal issue of Pakistan. First, there are almost 35 million "blood brothers" of the Taliban, Pashtuns living there. Secondly, Pakistan still does not lose hope of somehow taming and directing the Taliban bearded mob against the worst enemy, against India, in the form of a kind of "proxy". And thirdly, here you are partly right - after all of the above, a mistaken strike on Pakistani soldiers has become just an extremely convenient reason to end full-scale US-Pakistani cooperation ...

        PS
        By the way, "the last nail in the lid" was hammered by Trump, who was already being discussed in the topic - extremely harshly and rudely cursing the Pakistani government in his ill-fated Twitter, already being president. If the Yankees now try to restore their previous full-fledged relations with Pakistan, after the antics of the former president, it will be much more difficult for them to do this.
        1. +2
          17 September 2021 10: 20
          Quote: Citizen is simple (almost)
          Nothing confuses you in your version?

          No, it doesn't bother. At that time, there were American bases on the territory of Pakistan and had the right and the ability to move in airspace. Availability of a base - delegation of rights and joint control of airspace. The Taliban movement was banned in Pakistan and during the NATO invasion of Afghanistan, the Pakistanis provided full support in the logistics of the invasion, also deprived the Taliban of support and blocked the Taliban's cross-border logistics. Trump is absolutely right and only stated the fact of hostile actions, expressed in the logistics problems of the NATO army and losses, although the United States continued programs to finance the Pakistani army. And the broad Pakistanis, instead of the American F-16s, began to buy Chinese planes with American money. laughing
          1. 0
            17 September 2021 11: 50
            Quote: hrych
            No, it doesn't bother. At that time, there were American bases on the territory of Pakistan and had the right and the ability to move in airspace. Availability of a base - delegation of rights and joint control of airspace.

            Firstly, from Shamsi to Islamabad it is 500 kilometers at all - twice as far as from the same Afghan Jalalabad.
            Secondly, the use of an airbase provides for fairly clear rules and restrictions on its use - and not at all "the full right to move" in the rest of the country's airspace (and even when it pleases, without the knowledge of government forces). The Yankees need strikes or transports to Afghan territory - they are allocated a specific sector for flights, the country's authorities are warned about each important departure. But nothing more! This is not their country or even their airport. Therefore, they simply cannot manage there "as at home".

            Consequently, this entire mission absolutely could not have taken place without the knowledge (or even participation) of the Pakistani side. Moreover, all sources write that the flight was from Jalalabad - that is, the operation was also transboundary... Where were the brave Pakistani border guards and air defense? Or are they were warned in advance about who "should be skipped" ??? And even along the route, clearly completely unrelated to the direction to Shamsi??

            In general, as I said, it is in this operation that the Pakistanis are also in the business one hundred percent. It was for the reasons I indicated - Osama was "too uncomfortable a guest" for them. But they could not remove it with their own hands. for domestic political reasons - therefore, they "tactfully" removed it by the hands of the Americans, providing this operation with an air corridor and full support from their side. A typical oriental trick: they got rid of their own problem, and didn't get their hands dirty, like they just stood there.
            I don’t understand why there is more to be wise ...

            Quote: hrych
            Trump is absolutely right and only stated the fact of hostile actions

            In fact, it is possible. But not in the form of the statement. The president simply has no right to speak like that about allies, even former ones (and even more so about those potentially important in the future). Three years ago, he blurted out a foolish message - and three months ago, the Pakistanis no longer even gave the Americans an ordinary logistical base for the withdrawal of troops, even under a different president. This is called "consequences".
            For there is nothing to wag the tongue how much in vain. Any stupidity has its consequences even in ordinary life - and in politics it is much stronger.
            1. +2
              17 September 2021 12: 08
              Quote: Citizen is simple (almost)
              Therefore, they simply cannot manage there "as at home".

              Now they cannot. And before that, they were in charge, until they got rid of the impudent people. The Americans themselves transferred the bases from Pakistan to Herat, to a more convenient and better place, the naval base was of course an irreparable loss. Warn and get the corridor, no problem and don't go into details. That a secret special operation is being carried out is one thing, and then media, Obama's PR for the whole world is another. Moreover, they say that the sick old man died earlier, and this pogrom is a staging. Pakistan and its government were set up tightly. But this is not all, a blow to the Pakistani military in Salalah with a bunch of corpses, and even against the background of the scandal with Laden - the height of insolence, Hillary also apologized after a while and out of hand, after which, of course, the Pakistanis can be understood. And Trump achieved a lot with his attacks. by the way, he trained the Chinese well against the background of Eun, whom he eventually shook hands with. And that he told the Pakistanis sharply the truth, on the contrary, the last attempt to bring them to their senses. And if he was organizing the withdrawal of troops, the Pakistanis would try to refuse him, this is not sleepy Joe, for whom the main thing is to be left alone and not to interfere with sleep.
              1. 0
                17 September 2021 12: 57
                Quote: hrych
                And before that, they were in charge, until they got rid of the impudent people.

                You clearly underestimate packs. The country, although not the richest, but very "proud and wayward" (only one long and desperate butting with Indians superior on all fronts is worth something)). And always "on my mind."
                Plus, there were (and still are) a lot of anti-American sentiments inside the country. Therefore, to really allow the Americans to "master" would be simply suicide for any Pakistani government.

                Warn and get the corridor, no problem and don't go into details.

                Do you really think that the government of any country in the world at least won’t ask why the hell is this towards the capital Is the American Assault Force Moving?
                I think that even some Zimbabwe would at least ask: "And for what purpose, in fact, did you suddenly need this, comrades Yankees?" And the militarized Pakistanis, even more so, will demand all the information. Moreover, they know the course, Osama's whereabouts are also known - even any soldier, let alone the command, can add two and two.

                Quote: hrych
                But that's not all, a blow to the Pakistani military in Salalah with a bunch of corpses, and even against the background of the scandal with Laden - the height of insolence

                First, there was no particular "scandal" with Laden. The Pakistani Foreign Ministry has standardly (and ostentatiously) only "expressed deep concern." Because it was beneficial for them (see comment earlier).
                Secondly, the strike in Salalah is not "meanness", but the simplest stupidity. Moreover, on both sides. This, alas, happens in war. But the excuse for breaking off the relationship was a good one, it couldn't be more convenient, yes.

                Quote: hrych
                And Trump achieved a lot with his attacks. by the way, he trained the Chinese well against the background of Eun, whom he eventually shook hands with.

                ... And in the end he "achieved" only that he broke much more than he built. "Just an excellent head of the country", which is already there. Everyone would have such (pah-pah-pah, so as not to jinx it). stop

                Quote: hrych
                And if he was organizing the withdrawal of troops, the Pakistanis would try to refuse him

                And what would you do? Would you unleash a war with a nuclear country? Or would he bring the AUG into the Arabian Sea to "just hurt"? But such a feint rolls only once, the second time it does not work.

                Did the same Eun at least have an effect? Not a bit! Comrade Eun only became convinced of the "weakness and indecision of the American presidents" (well, as he thinks). After all these "tearful handshakes" with "kind Donnie" - just the other day he again "shot with rackets" into the Sea of ​​Japan (it is not even clear whether he tested rockets, or tested patience). And they all saw it very well.
                1. +2
                  17 September 2021 13: 32
                  Under the pretext of Eun, Ohio approached Beijing, and B-1b flew there. The Chinese then fled from the DPRK. The merchant fleet and more. And Eun shook hands with Trump. The DPRK is understandable, but China was terrified. I went to all the trade concessions, etc. And Eun started firing rockets not under Donnie, but under Josie
                  1. 0
                    17 September 2021 14: 38
                    Quote: hrych
                    but China was terrified

                    For that matter, South Korea was the most frightened of all. Because it is she who is in the priority of North Korean goals (both as an "ideological enemy" and as an ally of the United States).
                    And China ... He's got a benefit here in any case. What to get the splinter out of the ass in the form of the always raging "neighbor", what to weaken the American competitors - both options suit.

                    And, by the way, the Yankee fleet entered the Sea of ​​Japan from the other side - apparently, not least in order not to provoke the Chinese and so that China would not see them as a threat to itself. However, from there and in general it is more convenient (if you "enter" the DPRK from the sea), and two whole allies from that side ...

                    And Eun started firing rockets not with Donnie, but with Josie

                    Looks like "trying on strength", that's all.
                    But the fact is that none of the previous "strong handshakes" have led to nothing at all. Political success is when your affairs work even after you. You can't say that about Donnie yet, well, not at all. Rather, on the contrary, under the new government, many of its previous "undertakings" are successfully collapsing.

                    PS
                    Perhaps he is a really good businessman (although the question of the real profitability of his companies is still open). But the president is definitely useless - too impulsive, too self-willed, too unrestrained in his language. There should be no such in politics at all, otherwise it will definitely not lead to good, in my opinion.
                    1. +1
                      17 September 2021 18: 56
                      Strong handshakes threw back the process launched by Russia on the Trans-Korean railway connected to the Russian Railways and the process with the Trans-Korean, gas pipe. In the case of the Great Gas War (IGW), no one else has been able to inflict damage on Russia like Trump. Thanks to him, the SP-2 was completed only now and Russia had to try to complete it on its own, and not a few years ago. Thanks to him, the return to trans-Korean projects will be only now. The strike against Belarus is clearly designed under Trump. The failure of the Bolivian junta and the end of the roll-over to Venezuela is also due to Trump's departure. And only Trump's departure allowed us to win and the war ended. But as usual, the Fourth World War is over, hello Fifth. Trump is an enemy and an enemy deserving of respect. This is not the lousy Obama who got the United States at the height of his power, but left the gas station country. Now the United States sells LNG to the same South Korea, and so our gas would go. But prices have shot up and we are now training the EU. But here Trump is no longer to blame, although this is directly related to him.
                      1. 0
                        18 September 2021 02: 55
                        Quote: hrych
                        Strong handshakes threw back the process launched by Russia on the Trans-Korean railway connected to the Russian Railways and the process with the Trans-Korean, gas pipe.

                        Both of these projects had problems from the very beginning - precisely because of the unpredictability of the North Korean regime. Few agreed to entrust Pyongyang with control over such strategically important cross-border "arteries."

                        Quote: hrych
                        no one else has been able to harm Russia like Trump. Thanks to him, the SP-2 was completed only now and Russia had to try to complete it on its own, and not a few years ago.

                        Excuse me, but no one says that Trump is allegedly an "ally of Russia." He's just an ordinary wildly spoiled tyrant who has seven Fridays a week. The rationality of American (as well as any other, by the way) presidents is not measured at all in "how much they were able to harm Russia" - but in completely different qualities, professional ones.

                        That is why I say that there is simply no place for such types in big politics. Especially at the head of a very large country with the largest military and economic power in the world (alas, but just a fact). It will be just like an elephant in a china shop. Moreover, it is a completely unpredictable elephant - it is not known from what leg he will get up tomorrow and what else will come to his head.
                        Therefore, it is better here (even for us!) "Boring" systemic American politicians (even like the same Joe) - they at least predictable... If an ally, then an ally, if an enemy, then an enemy. And no "roulette" with moods and decisions, no "unexpected".
                        Plus, do not forget that this "leader" managed to arrange a fairly strong split even in his native society - in modern history, it has never been so strong before. civil strife between supporters of Democrats and Republicans.

                        Do you still think this is a "good president" ??? request
    2. -3
      17 September 2021 08: 52
      Quote: Avior
      At the same time, Trump is somehow modestly silent that the decision to withdraw troops from Afghanistan by May 1, 2021 is his, Trump's, decision, and his administration signed an agreement with the Taliban.
      About the fight against coronavirus, Trump himself did not do any better, it cost him the presidency.

      For turboskakuasov tryampnyash laughing
  7. +6
    17 September 2021 07: 46
    I left the hut
    I went to fight
    To land in Montana
    Give it to the negligent girls.
    Farewell, dear!
    Goodbye family!
    "Montana, Montana,
    Montana is mine! "
  8. -2
    17 September 2021 08: 18
    According to Donald Trump, today America is "going downhill."

    And what else is there for him to broadcast? One of the most scandalous presidents in history, he adores personal power. From the White House, this failed "prick" was kicked out with almost dirty rags. In my opinion, if anyone else were in Biden's place now, even three times a Republican, Trump would have been throwing mud at him in the same way. It's just that the little man himself is so scandalous and loving pi ... do not move bags, in short ... winked

    It turns out that Biden currently has the lowest level of American approval since his inauguration. It is 44%.

    Curiously, four years ago by this time (8 months from the date of the inauguration), the level of approval of the Trump citizen himself fluctuated somewhere between 35-36%. That is, almost 10% (or almost a third, whichever is more convenient to count) lower than Biden's 44% now.

    Moreover, the most interesting thing is that the then so low level of support for Trump happened by itself, in general, even without any major gestures (like the withdrawal of troops, as it is now). Therefore, the reasons for his current "violent jealousy" are more than understandable ... lol
  9. +1
    17 September 2021 08: 53
    According to Donald Trump, today America is “going underOS ". The former head of the American state noted that "Biden's policies are leading the country into the abyss."
    Here he is right. And judging by the latest events, the merikatosia not only "walks", runs at a gallop. And at the moment of its final fall, the wounded beast can do anything. Moreover, a beast with nuclear weapons. angry
  10. +1
    17 September 2021 09: 23
    Trump mocks old man Biden.
    wassat
    As the saying goes, debt payment is red.
  11. +1
    17 September 2021 10: 06
    I don’t know about the economy, but society is degrading rapidly.
  12. 0
    17 September 2021 11: 38
    His words to God in the ears ...
  13. +1
    17 September 2021 12: 37
    We're going downhill. There may be no elections, since there may not be a country in which they are held.
    His words, God’s ears!
  14. -2
    17 September 2021 16: 18
    Trump is either wang or knows something.
  15. 0
    17 September 2021 17: 31
    Stalin's Strait?
  16. 0
    19 September 2021 12: 08
    Give it to Gd. The world will become cleaner.