American Press: US Waging Cold War on Two Fronts May Not Endure

39

The United States has once again declared Russia and China as the main threats to the country's security. However, the United States may not be able to withstand a cold war on two fronts, says Ted Carpenter, author of an article for The American Conservative.

The United States is on bad terms with both Russia and China, the author writes. However, with this approach, the American authorities only complicate their lives, mistakes in foreign policy can lead to a dangerous situation.



Washington is trying to confront two geopolitical adversaries at once, but such a situation could threaten the security of America, Carpenter said. Therefore, the Biden administration needs to make several important decisions that will help in the future.

The United States needs to determine the main adversary, choosing either Russia or China as it, and not oppose two at once, the author claims. By opposing both Moscow and Beijing, Washington makes itself worse by forcing its opponents to draw closer. Therefore, the United States needs to restore relations with one of these countries, and confront the other. It would be much better if Washington restored relations with both countries, but the White House will not agree to this, the US needs an enemy, as the observer writes.

The author himself is inclined to choose Russia as a probable ally, since, in his opinion, China is a stronger adversary. Thus, the US administration needs to restore friendly relations with Moscow as soon as possible.

Otherwise, the United States may not be able to withstand the conduct of the Cold War on two fronts with a probable transition to the hot phase, he sums up.
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    15 September 2021 13: 57
    Well, let them stay in our skin, as we did in the late 80s. Not sugar, they will not melt.
    1. +6
      15 September 2021 14: 19
      It seems the Americans have begun to guess something. am
    2. +5
      15 September 2021 14: 20
      The United States has once again declared Russia and China as the main threats to the country's security. However, the United States may not be able to withstand a cold war on two fronts.

      You can't stand the cold one, but will they win in the "hot" one?
      Don't you want to try to live peacefully?
      Nobody attacks your states and does not even think, so why should you look for and make enemies for yourself ?!
      1. 0
        15 September 2021 15: 18
        Then money, a lot of money for weapons will not be given. And so, as much as they ask, they allocate as much. They print out of necessity, not security. Why should they worry, all countries will take on inflation.
    3. +2
      15 September 2021 16: 11
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Well, let them stay in our skin, as we did in the late 80s. Not sugar, they will not melt.

      And I also hope, as we are in the 90s .. The bells are already coming.
  2. +11
    15 September 2021 14: 00
    Uh-huh .. And - what will we be offered for the type of friendship? Conflict with China in lieu of lifting some of the sanctions or membership in the G-7? Why is this for Russia ?? Moreover, only a complete schizoid can try to negotiate with America. For - their word is not worth a damn cent. Which has been proven more than once ..
    1. +1
      15 September 2021 14: 05
      About a cent, and even eaten away, you really bent it. Straight to Cicero. wassat laughing lol hi
    2. 0
      16 September 2021 00: 42
      Conflict with China in lieu of lifting some of the sanctions or membership in the G-7? Why is this for Russia?

      Russia will not go anywhere from the conflict with China. If he wants to remain a country, not a vassal of China. The only question is what kind of turmoil will be before the USA-China or the RF-China. There will be no Russian-US turmoil. It makes no sense for the United States, and even more so for Russia.
      Actually, the Chinese are already pushing not only the Americans, but also the Russians from the usual "feeding fields".
  3. 0
    15 September 2021 14: 00
    I don't understand the stubbornness of the American establishment ... why fight the whole world when you can be friends.
    Not a single state on our planet is capable of conquering the whole world, and even more so to retain power ... Sisyphean labor.
    How long does it take for the Americans to get it? what
    1. +2
      15 September 2021 14: 03
      why fight with the whole world when you can be friends

      You can't get a lot of dough on friendship .. Nobody will give it back with goodness?
    2. +10
      15 September 2021 14: 08
      Friendship with America usually ends next to the gangway or on the landing gear of American planes flying out.
      1. +2
        15 September 2021 15: 02
        And this observer of the states (or pants with straps lol ) thought Russia and the United States would want to be friends? The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
    3. 0
      15 September 2021 20: 38
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      No state on our planet is capable of conquering the whole world

      The Chinese will conquer. And very soon.
  4. +2
    15 September 2021 14: 02
    Hehe. The main thing is to get involved, and then the war will show the plan, or pan, or disappeared.
  5. +10
    15 September 2021 14: 04
    It would be much better if Washington restored relations with both countries, but the White House will not agree to this, the US needs an enemy, as the observer writes.

    After such a statement, neither Russia nor China will become an ally of the striped ones. It is clear that having finished with one country, the striped ones will take up another, immediately forgetting all possible allied agreements.
    1. +2
      15 September 2021 15: 25
      Quote: Popandos
      It is clear that having finished with one country, the striped ones will take on another, immediately forgetting all possible allied agreements.

      In 1945, the British and Americans had already decided to continue the war, but against the USSR ... sad
  6. HAM
    0
    15 September 2021 14: 12
    Only a journalist says this ... although it has already become clear to him that "Bolivar cannot bear two" ...
    1. +2
      15 September 2021 14: 35
      Quote: HAM
      Only a journalist says this ... although it has already become clear to him that "Bolivar cannot bear two" ..

      This journalist has not yet realized that "Bolivar cannot bear even one, let alone two"
  7. 0
    15 September 2021 14: 13
    At the numerous requests of American workers, the West 2021 exercise has been completed, we did not even fire a single ICBM during the exercise. So, America has two fronts. I don’t understand.
    1. 0
      15 September 2021 21: 03
      Quote: tralflot1832
      we didn't even fire a single ICBM during the exercise.
      Well, don't tell me! Electronic launchers - 12 pieces, already! And if we take into account that today (at the final stage of the SSU) our combat crew of the Strategic Missile Forces (!) Launched Soyuz 2.1b into orbit with 30 English communications satellites, which were placed in orbit by the FREGATE, then we can assume that the Russians were "firing" at envy all UEROPE on the crows with a shotgun! bully
      1. 0
        15 September 2021 21: 41
        So I missed it! recourse
  8. CYM
    +6
    15 September 2021 14: 18
    "Only friendship with him can be worse than enmity with the Anglo-Saxon." (Alexey Vandam). winked
    1. +1
      15 September 2021 14: 32
      So they (Anglo-Saxons) now and among themselves dogs.

      Boris Biden and Joe Johnson represent groups with different interests.

      In the UK, the United States interferes with manure.
  9. 0
    15 September 2021 14: 58
    Yankees maneuvered, maneuvered and did not fish laughing
  10. -1
    15 September 2021 15: 07
    So they can't stand it - everyone chases the Americans with rags.
  11. +1
    15 September 2021 15: 21
    The US is on bad terms with both Russia and China

    Uncle SI already sent Bidon today when he requested (!) A personal meeting. Earlier, the head of the Chinese delegation advised the American side to shut up if they cannot behave themselves. We only go to preoccupied ... sad
  12. 0
    15 September 2021 15: 34
    The United States will withstand the Cold War with the Russian Federation and the PRC, I have no doubt. There will be 51 or 54 presidents, I don’t remember exactly, it was just a dream. Biden's. He sleeps and sees. He sees everything, even when Ze, who looks like Monica, crawls up to him. Closer, closer ...
  13. 0
    15 September 2021 17: 37
    That is, Russia will now be put in the role of Germany?
    They will make Hitler out of Putin against C - the routine of the Naglo-Saxons.
    But we need Russian fools, inveterate, hardened, guzmanut-bulk ...
    then ... but until then, fig them. But fools, obviously, are unmeasured ... alas.
    1. 0
      15 September 2021 21: 18
      Quote: Logika
      That is, Russia will now be put in the role of Germany?
      They will make Hitler out of Putin against C - the routine of the Naglo-Saxons.

      Damn, if it were the Anglo-Saxons, then there would be no need to boil. And here, today !, in the German Die Welt, some kind of shortage of Hitler-Yugant (grown up) wrote that Russia illegally wrested land from China in the 19th century. And it would not be bad for Russia to return them to its eastern neighbor. Is this not a direct incitement of the PRC to confrontation with the Russian Federation !? And most importantly, who stutters about it? - Germany !!! (And we give them cheap gas so that the Fritzes don't freeze!)
      Therefore, as it was said at one time in the service, - AROUND ENEMIES and colleagues! And keep the gunpowder dry ... Yes-ah-ah ... here.
  14. 0
    15 September 2021 17: 42
    Something tells me that they are only afraid of us because of Yao, and for their people Russia is an ancient habitual evil and it is easier for them against us. But with the Chinese, everything is too complicated. They cannot be bought with beads, taught by the experience of the union.
  15. +1
    15 September 2021 17: 55
    The United States has driven itself into a situation from which it is difficult to find a way out. A large (if not the main) segment of their economy relies on the military budget, accordingly, an enemy is needed, Russia is more familiar to the average person here (as the heir to the USSR), they are already afraid of China and the ambitions of the Middle Kingdom only fuel their fear. In order to somehow level the processes, the states are pulling India into a tough confrontation with China (partly instead of Pakistan), and for Russia they have prepared the outskirts and Afghanistan stuffed with modern weapons. In the short term, this is more likely to be an effective step, in the long term (about reasonable politics), first of all, Russia, as well as China and India, will most likely lead to, if not a devaluation of the influence of the United States, then at least to an even greater reputation default.
    P.s the most unpredictable link (but also the key one) is our country, I am very afraid that the Americans will sacrifice us once again beckoning their finger and once again our establishment will throw themselves into their arms.
  16. -1
    15 September 2021 18: 05
    In its current state, mattress toppers will not withstand the Cold War, even one-on-one with China)) it's time to get out of the habit of the world's gendarme's overcoat
    1. 0
      15 September 2021 20: 50
      Quote: TermNachTER
      it's time to get out of the habit of the overcoat of the world gendarme

      But China is increasingly drawn into this role. There is not a single country in which China does not have its own interests and does not defend them very harshly. Africa is almost all Chinese. The former parts of the USSR are also vying with each other and give up one territory after another. And judging by Biden's behavior, China will not have any special problems with Europe either.
      1. 0
        16 September 2021 00: 18
        To do this, China needs military infrastructure around the world - bases and warehouses. So far, Beijing has not been seen in such actions, except for one base in Africa. hi
        1. 0
          16 September 2021 06: 56
          As the late Clausewitz used to say: "For a war you need three things - money, money and money" It is money, not bases. And war does not have to be military force. The overwhelming majority of countries will voluntarily cede their territories in exchange for guarantees for the ruling elite. At least Russia is moving towards this option at full speed.
      2. 0
        16 September 2021 12: 50
        Quote: syndicalist
        Africa is almost all Chinese.

        not yet Chinese. about half of this French colony is practically in the classical sense. yes, the French have something to worry about wassat
  17. 0
    16 September 2021 09: 27
    They will not pull a land war against China or the Russian Federation ..... They will not pull the blockade of each separately either. But they will pull the war over some overseas territories, the Russian Federation does not seek there. And you will have to fight at a distance with caution - China is increasing parity in nuclear weapons. Therefore, it is most profitable to invest in neighbors such as Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, Thailand. Poland, the Baltic States, etc.
  18. 0
    16 September 2021 13: 44
    I don’t believe the Anglo-Saxons, and I don’t believe the Chinese even more. China has clear territorial claims against Russia and they will never forget about it. Probably, until the countries of Europe, primarily Germany and France, do not understand that Russia is their natural and historical ally, nothing will move. Perpetual nuclear-pumped stalemate.
  19. 0
    16 September 2021 13: 47
    The best thing that Russia and China can do is sign a global agreement on the complete nullification of mutual claims and a clear delimitation of spheres of influence.