Russia can use the Afghan crisis to propose a new model of the world order

27

Russia is closely following the events in Afghanistan. Meanwhile, in Panjshir, not only hostilities continue, but also an information war. Against the background of serious problems with mobile communications and the Internet in this region of Afghanistan, the parties to the conflict often publish information that, to put it mildly, does not fully correspond to reality.

Just the other day, the militia of Ahmad Massoud announced the defeat of the Taliban column (* a terrorist group banned in Russia), as well as the capture of dozens of militants. Today the Taliban are already making a "retaliatory move", claiming that the Afghan province of Panjshir has come fully under their control.



Earlier, the Taliban * stated that they had blocked the main land routes of communications of the Panjshir, including approaches from the Nuristan province, which borders Pakistan.

Afghan affairs lead to the fact that an increasing number of foreign experts consider the state of these very affairs to be a complete failure for the United States. History, which was usually programmed chaos to protect purely American interests, seems to be coming to an end. None of the world leaders today are demonstrating optimism, realizing that the United States can not only abandon previously held territories, but also its allies. And this is a precedent. Those of the allies who are stronger wondered whether they needed "protection" from the American generals. Those who are weaker are seized by a real panic - after all, the hegemon turned out to be not so reinforced concrete in the military-political plan as it was always perceived.

Now Russia may well take advantage of the situation. Moscow is able to offer a new version of the world order - full-fledged multipolarity: when not one player decides everything on the world stage, but several key powers that would responsibly approach the solution of world problems. Isn't it utopian?

Comments by Mikhail Leontyev in the author's program "However":

27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -5
    6 September 2021 07: 46
    A holy place is never empty: Russia is simply obliged to take the appropriate position, and not graze the back.
    1. +9
      6 September 2021 07: 58
      Maybe pay more attention to Russia?
      1. +6
        6 September 2021 08: 00
        do you mean, do not forget about internal affairs
        otherwise it won't work
        you need to keep up both there and there
      2. +4
        6 September 2021 10: 17
        Maybe pay more attention to Russia?

        In, in. To begin with, I would defend my world order.

        https://yandex.ru/turbo/ridus.ru/s/news/361141
        1. +1
          7 September 2021 13: 31
          Maybe pay more attention to Russia?
          do you mean, do not forget about internal affairs
          otherwise it won't work
          you need to keep up both there and there

          In, in. To begin with, I would defend my world order.
          It is impossible to deal only with domestic politics. The well-known expression "If you are not interested in politics, then she is interested in you" is also true for international politics. Whether you want it or not.
          1. +1
            7 September 2021 14: 14
            It is impossible to deal only with domestic politics. The well-known expression "If you are not interested in politics, then she is interested in you" is also true for international politics. Whether you want it or not.

            It's true. But politics is different. We laugh at the Americans, but they themselves have the same situation in Syria.
            1. +1
              8 September 2021 05: 19
              Well, we are in Syria - so to speak, a test pancake lump, but what are our years). And so the Americans are great - they jumped out on time. Yes, it probably did not go according to plan, they were like they pinched their tail there - you see someone violated the agreement - and for this we already see Guinea and the aluminum business (50% Chinese and about 30-40% Russian) to be on the verge of being squeezed out. We are attending a great card game. Gentlemen, enjoy. It will be very interesting. And the noise will be in the media - well, their job is to praise and say what they are told by those who pay them.
    2. +3
      6 September 2021 08: 24
      In the foreseeable future, the Yankes will not go to the "big" war.
      Will give more "freedom" to their allies.
      They realized that the "reformatting" of states by military means would not work.
      BUT:
      -increase the activity of the fifth column in "non-democratic" countries.
      -try to sow enmity between "neighbors" (create chaos) in "promising" regions, including the Caucasus, Central Asia.
      Again, with MINIMUM participation of the US Armed Forces.
    3. +10
      6 September 2021 09: 38
      We, Russia, have created some incredible capitalist-feudal construct in our country. So what can the Russian authorities offer the world based on their experience?
      In addition, China has already made a proposal for a new world order and India is trying. The latter is based on the Chinese experience, but on a democratic basis.
      1. +4
        6 September 2021 11: 10
        Quote: populist
        We, Russia, have created some incredible capitalist-feudal construct in our country.

        + must be added - braided with pipes laughing without ideology and a really new model of social progress, this will not be anything new. If Humanity cannot build Communism, it will not.
      2. +1
        10 September 2021 09: 49
        Quote: populist
        We - Russia have created some incredible capitalist-feudal feudal capitalist construct. So what can the Russian authorities offer the world based on their experience?

        good
        Nothing attractive ... Yes
        Russia can use the Afghan crisis to propose a new model of the world order

        First you need to figure out why the president in Russia cannot change anything except what the moneybags need, and then find out who in the world will be happy with the tutelage of Russian oligarchs.
        1. +1
          10 September 2021 12: 15
          Thanks for the comment.
          Quote: ROSS 42
          Nothing attractive ...

          And everyone in the world knows this in the ruling circles and not only in the ruling circles.
          Quote: ROSS 42
          First you need to figure out why the president in Russia cannot change anything, except what moneybags need

          He has such convictions and advisers. But the main thing, of course, is beliefs.
          Quote: ROSS 42
          We, Russia, have created some incredible capitalist-feudal feudal-capitalist construct.

          On reflection, I will still insist on my definition. On the common basis of the capitalist mode of production, there is some kind of feudal dependence of significant producers on the central and local authorities.
          It is possible that this is a common feature for all comprador and corrupt regimes.
  2. -3
    6 September 2021 07: 51
    Now Russia may well take advantage of the situation. Moscow is able to offer a new version of the world order - full-fledged multipolarity: when not one player decides everything on the world stage, but several key powers that would responsibly approach the solution of world problems. Isn't it utopian?

    No, not utopian. Russia has long been building equal relations with all countries, and does not climb into someone else's garden with its own charter.

  3. +8
    6 September 2021 08: 02
    Comments by Mikhail Leontyev in the author's program "However"

    Leontiev is still a seer
  4. +7
    6 September 2021 08: 48
    What model of the world order are we talking about? This model is not indicated anywhere. Right now, the best action against Afghanistan is to do nothing until it settles down. And the most effective measure may be to strengthen the state. border with Kazakhstan. China, too, will not rush into relations. All natural resources in Afghanistan require an exorbitant investment.
  5. 0
    6 September 2021 08: 48
    Yes, Russia and China will climb into Afghanistan, like others, many will come to an agreement with many. Something will be built, power plants, communications. The main thing is that the Taliban do not suffer from garbage, but they are, for now, peaceful. Well, or they understand what the RF Air Force will do to them, if they go somewhere in Uzbekistan. As a result, everyone will save money, everyone is fine, especially the Afghans, but what does the new world order have to do with it?
    1. +5
      6 September 2021 10: 00
      Today. In your opinion, if we politely build objects in this country, then everything will work out, if there are no internal contradictions. Take Turkey. Where she just does not try to build her presence. But remember, in less than ten years it will all collapse. It is the internal contradictions that will play the main role. Nowadays there is no absolute agreement in any country. And you need to look at a foreign country through the prism of your internal security.
      1. +1
        10 September 2021 09: 53
        Quote: nikvic46
        Take Turkey. Where she just does not try to build her presence. But remember, in less than ten years it will all collapse.

        Yes
        It is necessary to build a state policy within the country so that every citizen can say:
        Look, envy, I am a citizen of Russia!
    2. +5
      6 September 2021 12: 37
      Quote: EvilLion
      but what does the new world order have to do with it?

      these are ambitions ... the world order was the USSR proposed
  6. +1
    6 September 2021 09: 11
    Russia, China will be invited to the meeting of the G7 foreign ministers dedicated to the situation in Afghanistan, which will be held on September 8.
    https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2021/09/05/885298-rossiyu-kitai-afganistanu
    And what can the G7 offer to Russia and China? No, Russia and China themselves will negotiate with the Taliban, they will solve the problems that arise themselves.
  7. +8
    6 September 2021 09: 54
    Funny. Putin can only offer to bring a gang of crooks and thieves to power in Afghanistan, create a powerful system of law enforcement agencies, give the command to plunder this gang and the heads of the security forces of everything and everything that remains, increase taxes, fines, and make fake elections. The current government is not able to offer anything more, because they can't do anything else.
    Although none of this will happen, tk. There is no oil and gas in Afghanistan, so there is nothing special to plunder.
    1. -7
      6 September 2021 11: 07
      Another sectarian of bulk
    2. +3
      6 September 2021 12: 41
      Quote: Esaul
      Funny. Putin can only offer to bring a gang of crooks and thieves to power in Afghanistan, create a powerful system of law enforcement agencies,

      Putin will not do this, the Afghans expect that Russia will build roads and hospitals there as before, it seems that this is also not planned. As the Taliban (an organization banned in the Russian Federation laughing ) they will figure it out, maybe they will become more aggressive with us.
    3. +1
      10 September 2021 09: 55
      Quote: Esaul
      Funny. Putin can only offer to bring a gang of crooks and thieves to power in Afghanistan

      There is a video about who filled the Crimea:
  8. +2
    6 September 2021 20: 30
    Sounds funny. Everything that the Kremlin can voice has long been voiced: "The United States is the only superpower and the Kremlin accepts this," "Russia is an energy superpower."

    Well, before the elections okhlos 10 thousand to buy a stick of sausage and put a daw where necessary. So live.
  9. +2
    7 September 2021 15: 47
    Stop raving already. For a long time, no one has asked us about anything, the "policy of the cat Leopold" and sheer helplessness are doing their job, the influence even on their own, it is not clear from what hangover abandoned lands and called "gifted nobility" independent state institutions, is absent, this place has already been taken in advance neighbors and overseas "partners", with the utter indifference and infantilism of our boyars, busy only filling their pockets. How can you cut off a hand and call it an independent organism with its own soul and mind. What you need to have in your head for this is what kind of complete scum you need to be so that, because of your unsupported ambitions, you destroy your Motherland, your people, everything that our great ancestors sought with blood and lives, and all crimes for the sake of satisfying their philistine desires. What can we offer them today, what are the achievements in economics, politics, social or cultural life, how and to whom are we attractive in the end? Our former friends and allies, previously even to the detriment of themselves were ready to stand next to each other in a period of any danger, will never forget how we basely betrayed them and handed them over to the enemy for plunder and destruction, and in the literal sense of the word, what faith and trust in this dying out and plundered territory, clinging to a nuclear club, but selling everything and everyone and its soul. Therefore, it makes no sense for the poor, who destroyed their great power with their own hands for the sake of a bunch of ambitious personalities, without the honor of conscience, who wished to create an estate society and monetize power, going to any crimes and the most heinous betrayal, expect any respect for themselves, at least at the level Afghans.
  10. -1
    9 September 2021 18: 34
    Now Russia may well take advantage of the situation. Moscow is able to offer a new version of the world order - full-fledged multipolarity: when not one player decides everything on the world stage, but several key powers that would responsibly approach the solution of world problems. Isn't it utopian?

    Utopian! Firstly, we cannot offer anything particularly original and interesting for the "world order". This is evidenced by previous attempts at vague statements. But if we are talking about "players", then of course you can offer to play some new football or hockey. Secondly, the low weight and dependence of our economy on external and some internal factors do not allow us to "play" a significant role in global affairs ...