In the US, Arleigh Burke destroyers will equip SEWIP Block III with "electronic attack"

45
In the US, Arleigh Burke destroyers will equip SEWIP Block III with "electronic attack"

The American destroyers Arleigh Burke are planned to be equipped with the latest electronic warfare system. The Pentagon reports that these are SEWIP Block III "electronic attack" systems.

From a message from the American military department with reference to the developer (and this is Northrop Grumman):
Such systems will provide ships of the Arleigh Burke class with the ability to carry out electronic attacks, as well as countering such attacks from the enemy.

It is reported that in the future amphibious ships and American aircraft carriers will be equipped with the latest means of "electronic attack". The corresponding contract was signed between the developer and the US Department of Defense in June this year.

Developer Representative Mark Mini (Mike Meaney):

We developed the system at an important and opportune time: opponents are increasing their capabilities, and we need to respond to this. It is important that our naval forces have effective systems of electronic attack and countermeasures to the enemy's electronic warfare systems.

The development company claims that SEWIP Block III allows you to disable the electronics of missiles that are aimed at the warship:

Such a system can replace dozens of interceptor missiles. Its effectiveness is high. The electronic "brain" of the enemy's missile will simply be "burned out".

It is indicated that the system will block information transmission systems on enemy ships.

At the same time, a company representative refused to clarify the timing of the completion of tests of the SEWIP Block III electronic countermeasures system, adding that the system was designed in an open architecture and software format.

Experts, evaluating these statements, say that in this case the enemy can “pick up” the frequency variant of SEWIP operation and “reconfigure” it to block the electronics of its own (for American ships) weapons.
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -3
    3 August 2021 08: 04
    At the same time, a company representative refused to clarify the timing of the completion of tests of the SEWIP Block III electronic countermeasures system,
    Someday ... maybe ... most likely ... laughing It all depends on the amount of the sawn dough. laughing
    1. -8
      3 August 2021 08: 15
      How patriotic the barrel was painted in the colors of the national flag - now wait for the coloring of all barrels in Ukraine, from the pistol one to the "Hammer" pipe in the color of urine against the background of blue faience! And then loud reports that one of the conditions for joining NATO was fulfilled laughing

      As for SEWIP Block III, you can be sure that after installation they will drag their lakhani to the Black Sea for a test!
      1. -6
        3 August 2021 08: 18
        I also drew attention to the Merikatos trunk. This is how much the Negro was crawling on him, and he drew stripes with a brush (they don’t trust a white man)))? laughing
        And as regards their arrival laughing to the Black Sea with a possibly installed SEWIP Block III, then by that time it was no longer that our hackers would be able to dig deeper into their pribluda, but they would also drown out first-graders with smartphones. wink
        1. -1
          3 August 2021 08: 37
          I think that in your device Negro is smuggling faster
          1. -4
            3 August 2021 08: 55

            DarkSpy (Dmitry)
            Today, 08: 37

            0
            I think that in your device Negro is smuggling faster
            "And suddenly, out of nowhere, DarkSpy appeared!" laughing Where can we go without you sick people? laughing fool Rather Svidomo flyers ... I will not say anything about the origin.
        2. -6
          3 August 2021 09: 30
          I wonder if their diapers are also star-striped, and they are made in China. wassat
  2. +2
    3 August 2021 08: 29
    In the US, Arleigh Burke destroyers will equip SEWIP Block III with "electronic attack"
    The stick, as always, has two or even three ends!
    Around all devices, objects and certain types of equipment, soon such an intense field of electrical / radio interference will concentrate that even its own systems, different, will start / can greatly interfere!
    Will / will not be .... just interesting to see how such a problem will be solved / overcome ???
    1. +5
      3 August 2021 09: 07
      They frighten us so much, and then we'll see what they can do ...
      1. +2
        3 August 2021 09: 12
        This danger is relevant for ALL.
        Nothing new, no one demonstrates on new principles, but in the old fashioned way, there is an overload of information space, around many objects.
        In many cases, this greatly complicates, if not interferes with, what works.
        1. +4
          3 August 2021 09: 19
          Naturally, this does not bring anything good, it starts - the race continues and we need to be very careful ...
          1. +2
            3 August 2021 09: 24
            He wants to be ahead, but just keep up with others, accordingly survive, develop YOUR SCIENCE !!!
            Without this, now, completely nowhere.
            1. +4
              3 August 2021 09: 28
              Yes, you can't lag behind, but you shouldn't rush thoughtlessly, every step should be calculated very carefully ...
              1. +1
                3 August 2021 09: 33
                Scientific discoveries, without an element of adventurism / madness, would be much less !!! Alas, alas, it really is.
                A harmonious combination of cold calculation, careful preparation, scientific flair and a touch of adventurism ...
                something like this.
                1. +4
                  3 August 2021 09: 44
                  So no one disputes this, any discovery does not happen where it is expected ...
                  1. +1
                    3 August 2021 10: 00
                    In different ways ... it happens that they go deliberately and open, close to what was expected. It happens that they find it completely from the side.
  3. +3
    3 August 2021 09: 06
    At the same time, a company representative refused to clarify the timing of the completion of tests of the SEWIP Block III electronic countermeasures system, adding that the system was designed in an open architecture and software format.


    The flywheel of the race is not spinning childishly ...
    1. 0
      3 August 2021 09: 14
      Everyone wants to see / hear better, more, and disguise themselves, hide as much as possible!
      Contradictions in the basis of such desires are inevitable, alas, alas.
      1. +3
        3 August 2021 09: 21
        Here it is understandable, there will be a lot of information tinsel and you don't have to give in and look for counteraction to a non-existent threat ...
        1. 0
          3 August 2021 09: 26
          Suggesting to everyone, just not creating an unnecessary threat ... this seems to be out of the realm of fantasy. For now, at least.
          1. +3
            3 August 2021 09: 30
            The example of SDI, from the time of Reagan, speaks exactly about this ...
            1. 0
              3 August 2021 09: 35
              So this is the most detailed example, it seems ...
              1. +3
                3 August 2021 09: 45
                This technique continues to be used by the United States ...
                1. 0
                  3 August 2021 09: 58
                  In attempts to misinform the enemy, forbidden methods do not exist, there are only effective ones or not.
                  1. +2
                    3 August 2021 10: 52
                    Dear old-timers!
                    You would be in a personal with such meaningful communication. hi
                    1. +1
                      3 August 2021 11: 56
                      And what is wrong?
                      We have already figured out everything for ourselves, enough hints ...
                      If, when someone joins, is interested, we write more extensively ... at least we do not shy away from communication and explanation of our position, vision of the topic / problem soldier
                      1. +2
                        3 August 2021 12: 22
                        Quote: rocket757
                        We have already figured out everything for ourselves

                        I see. hi
                        And what is wrong?

                        Long flip through your get-together.
                        The impression is that you are winding up each other's pluses. wink
                        Hopefully no offense.
                      2. 0
                        3 August 2021 12: 38
                        I do not refuse to communicate, agree / disagree, put a plus ... this is according to the rules.
                        If I don’t like my opponent’s communication style ... I don’t put downsides, out of principle, never to anyone, just ignore, this is also according to the rules ...
                        Oh yes, but what can the advantages bring to me ??? however as well as cons. Neither there nor here.
                      3. The comment was deleted.
  4. -4
    3 August 2021 09: 37
    Similar systems exist against mines with remote detonation and against UAVs, why should they not be against missile electronics. Of course, if a particular system proves to be effective. The ship, with its great energy capabilities, surpassing any other carriers of such weapons, is an ideal platform for such systems.
    Experts, evaluating these statements, say that in this case the enemy can “pick up” the frequency variant of SEWIP operation and “reconfigure” it to block the electronics of its own (for American ships) weapons.

    The utter folly is written. It is not surprising that the "expert" is anonymous, just like the author.
    1. 0
      3 August 2021 10: 02
      This is not a microwave emitter. The usual active jammer, only improved. Establishing his specific performance characteristics is a task for our intelligence for the near future ...
      1. -1
        3 August 2021 10: 50
        Quote: grassyknollgunner
        This is not a microwave emitter. The usual active jammer, only improved.

        And how then to be with the statement in the article:
        Such a system can replace dozens of interceptor missiles. Its effectiveness is high. The electronic "brain" of the rocket adversary will simply be "burned out".
        1. +1
          3 August 2021 11: 00
          I double-checked on the developer's website and read publications in other military publications, nothing is said about the microwave emitter anywhere. This is an active jammer, only new ...
          1. 0
            3 August 2021 11: 01
            nowhere is anything said about the microwave emitter. This is an active jammer, only new ...

            Your information means that the article is inaccurate. wink
            After all, apart from the microwave, nothing can burn out electronics? hi
            1. 0
              3 August 2021 11: 02
              Let them give a link to the source, you can double-check ...
            2. +1
              3 August 2021 12: 44
              Not so, EMP of high intensity, burns out the electronics one or two times, if it is poorly protected.
              By the way, you can also protect yourself from microwave ovens.
              Any problem is complex, as a rule, either a cheap, light, sensitive homing system, or a well-protected, heavy, expensive and "dull" thing.
              Alas, alas, they will always seek a reasonable compromise. At least now, with current technologies.
              1. +1
                3 August 2021 13: 10
                Quote: rocket757
                Not so, EMP of high intensity, burns out the electronics one or two times, if it is poorly protected.
                By the way, you can also protect yourself from microwave ovens.

                If there is directional radiation, it can burn out.
                Does the United States have success with directional radiation?
                I have heard about our developments, but not about US ones.
                1. 0
                  3 August 2021 13: 54
                  There is a constant struggle between ... between everything that is considered to be used as a weapon, as a means of attack and defense.
                  Something turns out more successful and there is little talk about it, except when there is a need to scare, scare, protect!
                  Something cannot boast of outstanding success, performance characteristics, but advertising can be inflated beyond all reasonable limits ...
                  Alas, alas, this is a big business and there is no need to dream about honesty and truthfulness.
                  Let's just say that not everything can be effectively, cheaply, protected. Not all protection can be overcome without serious, or even not at great expense ...
                  There are still many, many secrets or information for a narrow circle of people ... from the sofa this is not visible, one can only guess.
          2. -1
            3 August 2021 11: 32
            Can you give a link to the developer's site?
            1. 0
              3 August 2021 11: 32
              https://www.northropgrumman.com/what-we-do/sea/surface-electronic-warfare-improvement-program-sewip/
      2. 0
        3 August 2021 11: 22
        Judging by the text of the article, this is not a jammer
        1. 0
          3 August 2021 11: 27
          SEWIP should replace the old SLQ-32 complexes.
          1. -1
            3 August 2021 13: 16
            Complement, not replace

            SLQ-32 A very general name, under it there are different variations with noticeably different functionality
        2. 0
          3 August 2021 13: 12
          So I was puzzled ...
  5. 0
    3 August 2021 09: 40
    It is indicated that the system will block information transmission systems on enemy ships.


    In terms of??
    No, theoretically it is still possible to jam the DV, SV and HF communication channels, although it is difficult due to problems with the range and size of the antenna fields to obtain the desired angle of the radiation pattern, but how to jam VHF and satellite communications to a ship beyond the radio horizon, I cannot imagine even in theory. And if we are talking about intra-ship networks, it generally sounds like nonsense.
    Here is the expansion of the possibilities of countering the work of the radar seeker of the anti-ship missile system, yes, this is serious.
  6. 0
    3 August 2021 09: 44
    Such a system can replace dozens of interceptor missiles. Its effectiveness is high. The electronic "brain" of the enemy's missile will simply be "burned out".

    This complex does not burn out the electronics of the missiles. He puts active and passive interference. I hope our missilemen are not standing still and will be able to ensure 100% overcoming of the electronic protection of American ships.
  7. -1
    3 August 2021 10: 24
    Quote: rocket757
    just interested to see how such a problem will be solved /

    Stanislav Lem's "Fiasco". Complete clogging of the radio range with white noise. Connection
    only via cables or laser modulated signal.