Into a new world through vaccination?
With two articles by a colleague of Fedorov on the compulsory nature of universal vaccination, he came to the conclusion that the second point of view on this issue has the right to life.
Of course, in presenting my opinion, I can easily do without epithets like “sectarians”, which my colleague Fedorov admitted in his materials, just a series of reflections on the topic “Why I haven’t grafted myself yet”.
I must say right away that I am not at all an anti-vaccine, I was vaccinated against the flu with pleasure, there was also a case of tetanus, but here there was a failure in the program. And I joined the ranks of the "partisans", which until you drag under the needle.
But the most interesting thing is that I did not close the doors for myself. Like many others. And I do not exclude the possibility of participating in the vaccination campaign, when, let's say, some conditions will be met.
Many will not like it, but thanks to another colleague, respected Alexander Privalov, I can imagine in great detail how everything happened in Israel. Alexander sent me for personal review reports on how everything happened with them, so for comparison I use Israel. With its luxurious medicine and social services.
Yes, of course, our country is not Israel at all, I understand the difference, but nevertheless.
So what confuses me about the vaccination campaign in Russia?
1. Submission of information. Another hysteria
Not the main reason, but a very significant one. I don't understand why it is impossible to organize a normal explanatory campaign in the country (no, I understand, but more on that in the next paragraph), why there must be hysteria.
As a person who was born almost 50 years ago, already fed up with it. “Vote, or you will lose”, “Vote, or NATO will come and take out all the resources”, “Pension reform or everything will collapse”, “The Constitution, or gays will come” and so on. The whole problem is that we are losing from election to election, only a completely blind or stupid person does not see the degradation of the political system, NATO soldiers and gays, it is true, did not come, but somehow it seems to me that they were not particularly going to come.
But it is a fact that instead of sensible explanations, stupid "antiquated" events began in accordance with the eternal double standards in Russia. So much has been written on this topic that I don't want to repeat myself. But I was always amused by the selectivity of the covid, who did not impress anyone at football, Krymnash, rallies for the adoption of the new Constitution, crowds artificially created by Sobyanin in the metro, and raged at rallies against the authorities and in pubs after 24 hours.
Perhaps, by the way, I still haven't gotten sick (except for a really strange week in December 2019) because I don't go to rallies against and I don't sit in a cafe after midnight. True, I don't go to football and rallies "for" either.
What the authorities have organized in Moscow (and as a carbon copy throughout the country) cannot be called smart and logical. And plus "we will fine, we will imprison, we will fine, we will fine, we will fine." An interesting whip method against the backdrop of frankly stupid "events" that simply left thousands of people unemployed.
But the hysteria about "you all will die tomorrow" was just wonderful. However, after the experienced cataclysms, it was no longer "catchy".
2. Rules of the game
Probably, the main reason for the reluctance to go to the vaccination center was the very rules of the game. And the most important reason was the complete lack of parity.
Okay, "the situation is threatening, everyone has to inject themselves." If the state says so, every normal citizen is simply obliged to go and get vaccinated. And the state is obliged to guarantee the citizen support and compensation "if something happens."
And how is it going with us? And so that it seems that it is necessary to inject, but before that the citizen signs a document in which he refuses all possible consequences for the rest of his life. Even if this end comes a month after vaccination.
The state does not bear any responsibility for the fact that it obliges the citizen to be vaccinated. The citizen himself is to blame for all subsequent events and consequences.
When the citizens of Israel were obliged to inject with an experimental drug (and it is still experimental, like Sputnik), they were issued insurance. Money was paid in the USA. Not big, but paid.
And in our country, citizens are simply twisted their hands, they are frightened of not being allowed to work, and the state and the vaccine developers do not want to answer for possible complications and "unfavorable outcomes". An interesting approach.
Well, it is necessary - then it is necessary. But why is everything so one-sided? Why is no one willing to be held accountable for the consequences?
For myself, I made the following conclusion: when everything will become clear with the drug, when the data on real contraindications will be published again (and not wiped out), when our representatives of the authorities and (probably, most importantly) developers will stop playing informational leapfrog (in the next paragraph ) - then we'll talk / think about it.
3. Gentlemen and the rules of the game
This is the second most "weighty" item. Personally, I did not at all like the informational leapfrog that was arranged by everyone, both government officials and vaccine developers.
The fact that Moscow is openly "burying" the vaccine from Novosibirsk does not give confidence in either one or the other. Ugly.
The fact that representatives of the authorities are openly lying, saying that they have taken root from the very top, is also the case. Governors have more than once come across the publication of very "strange" pictures of "grafting" through the sleeve of a shirt and so on. And higher is no better.
The main anti-advertiser turned out to be the president himself, who seems to have taken root, but does not remember when and what. And does not allow anyone to come to a decent distance. This leads an ordinary man in the street to two thoughts at once, which I will not voice here. But I thought both at once.
With regards to the leapfrog itself.
Unfortunately, there was so much information around vaccines that caused frank surprise that legs did not go to the point.
Pregnant women can not - pregnant women can - pregnant women need it. The evolution happened in just two months. It's the same with children. It is impossible - it is possible - it is necessary.
The question arises: on what basis were such conclusions drawn? Where was it tested (contrary to prohibitions)? Who is responsible for this?
Who studied how safe the drug is for children? This question is especially interesting. Who conducted the child safety trials of the vaccine and who will be responsible for this? For future children? Who tested it? Who will be in charge? There are no answers, there is no one in the courts. Not encouraging.
The constant change of information does not inspire confidence. That vaccine was "live" for three months, then six months, now increased to 8 months. Next, apparently, there will be a year.
Recently, Sputnik's developer boasted that its drug would protect people for more than a year. Then the term was reduced to a year. Today we are told that we will need to inject at least three times every six months.
In this case, the pricked ones also become infected and infect others, but they carry the infection in a milder form. However, many unvaccinated people also tolerate it mildly. I have examples of both the first and the second. The unvaccinated die. However, the vaccinated also began to die.
Ours argue that Sputnik is able to protect against all possible and impossible strains that are and will be. Let's just say, a very strange statement. But in Israel they say that the effectiveness of the active drug against the new Indian strain is only 64%. The protection was effective against the previous strain.
And we have? And we cheerfully said - go ahead, everything is fine. Sputnik will protect you from everything.
Recently, the deputy head of the Gamaleya Research Center, Denis Logunov, said that the new Sputnik strain works, but its effectiveness decreases 2,6 times. That is, the efficiency is about 38%. But at least you can trust the academician.
In general, today we can state that the advertising campaign did not play its due role. There is no certainty and she has nowhere to come from.
4. Political-oil component
Tell me, what does oil have to do with it? With that, politics. And money.
What an important political aspect is present in everything is understandable. Persuade to vaccinate all the same people who persuaded "to choose the right". Who gave me "Plato" and another not weak increase in prices, which have been struggling with poverty and prices in Russia for a long time and are invariably losing. Every year. Gasoline, diesel fuel, gas, housing and communal services, food - everything is growing, and these people just shrug their hands beautifully on TV and say that these are global trends. And nothing can be done here, because the market.
But if the market - sorry, I don't like the way the market advertises the provision of vaccination services. Without guarantee, without responsibility, without anything and exclusively at my expense.
Moreover, these same people, under a plausible pretext, deprived me of the funded part of my pension. As I understand it, forever. These same people added five years to my pension on the pretext that they could not pay me my pension, even taking into account my expropriated money.
I don't even want to talk about the Constitution.
And now, from all screens and even from the coffee maker, the call for vaccination rushes. In terms of intensity, there is even an overwhelming call to support the Constitution or elect Putin once again.
But I can't believe that they care about me so much. Well, at least kill, at least infect with covid - but I can't believe it. Because again everything is at my expense. As with a pension. As with the prices. As with everything in this country. The state has never done anything decent for its citizens - and then suddenly an attraction of unprecedented generosity ...
Involuntarily you begin to think about bad things. That one dose of an under-tested drug costs money. Foreigners paid 1300 rubles for Sputnik. Let it be 1000 at a discount, although, as is customary with us, ours are more expensive. Like gas and gasoline. The population of our country is 146 million people. Considering that now they plan to vaccinate everyone in a row, then here's the result: vaccination plus repeated, on average three doses per person - almost 500 billion rubles. And in turn, this is almost $ 7 billion in turnover.
Well, I can't help it, in such a situation I feel like oil. Who is not asked whether she wants to go into the pipe or not.
For all other things, despite the rather mediocre results in Europe with this vaccination, I understand that this may be a useful thing. But for this it would be necessary that this time with the state everything was more or less reciprocal. I understand that the market and business, I understand that Sobyanin makes money on masks, Chubais on vaccines, in this country everyone who can make money on the population. It is our karma to be oil for power if real oil is worthless.
BUT.
If the state insists on injections so much, let it provide guarantees to law-abiding citizens.
That would be fair. Or an honest choice, without coercion and twisting of hands (we will fire / inadmissible to work / fine), without dividing into right and wrong, without trampling on the Constitution again.
That is, I am neither "for" nor "against". I am for what we have not had in our country for a long time - for honesty and justice. For the mutual responsibility of citizens to the state and - especially - the state to citizens.
Agree, if we have a market and all that, coming to the store and buying products, in case of their inadequate quality, I have to demand a return, replacement, compensation if I get poisoned. Why should it be different with the vaccine? Why should I waive any claims for “voluntary” vaccinations?
Most of all I do not like this particular moment. I owe and owe, and in return - a complete zero. Moreover, there is a minimal set of information on the basis of which I cannot make a conclusion about how the vaccine is suitable for me.
Well, the general vaccination in mobile stations, where people are simply vaccinated, not at all interested in the possible consequences, is generally something. I watched this show at the mall. "Are you all right with your health?" - an affirmative answer is more than enough to “start the process”. Sorry, I cannot call this a professional approach. We do not have healthy people a priori, there are those who are not fully examined.
But I am sure we will talk about the consequences of such vaccination later, when the results are available.
Now proponents of vaccination will say: "everyone should himself" and all that. No. If the state wants me to be vaccinated, it must make sure that it does not harm me. The examination is at least in order to determine which vaccine is more suitable and whether there are any real contraindications. And insurance with coverage for potential damage in case things go wrong.
That would be a serious approach. Then I would feel like a citizen who has responsibilities to the state, and not an oil well.
Until then, excuse me, I prefer to wait. Until the moment when the results of the tests, which are being carried out today, are ready. Let's just say, I am simply exercising my right, given to me by the Constitution, nothing more. I hope no one will dispute it?
And as an afterword, two calls.
First. To those who are grafted. I do not understand the source of your aggression, which you demonstrate towards those who have not yet done so, but sometimes you get the impression that some kind of insult is gnawing at you. Therefore, the unvaccinated must be on the reservation, infringed on their rights, fined, deprived of medical care, and so on.
Let's do it this way: not only do such statements do not paint those who betray them, they are also illegal. Until the legislative base is changed, while the courts confirm the illegality of dismissals and restrictions on the unvaccinated - let's do without such appeals. This at least looks ugly.
Second. Let's all the same respect our great and mighty Russian language. Not only is he great and mighty, he is also beautiful. I do not know what kind of poor student he launched, and the rest picked up, but: dear readers, vaccinations are not given. Give enemas. Of course, if you were vaccinated by the method of injecting the vaccine through the anus into the rectum or directly into the colon - then yes, you were vaccinated. Enemy.
If the vaccine was administered using a syringe or air pistol, alas, you were vaccinated.
We have such a tendency, when at one time for many all the "last" suddenly became "extreme", all en masse turned out to be pilots, now they went to the "fershaly-chiropractors".
Well, we are Russians, let's still communicate in Russian. And may the last vaccine given to you protect you from more problems than the last vaccine delivered.
Cheers!
Information